Are we free individue?

Now I will tell something what I mean it should be interesting for you. This is my
way how I see woman through eyes of art history.
Woman. She could be anything what you want. She could be expression of vulgarity,
temptress, could be a few different symbols, woman from our society or saintress.

Venera of Vilendorf from Austrija. Somebody should tell that this is a

woman without identity and freedom to choose and speaks. Yes, but
she is a part of all of us. She shows central point ours being extension of human beings. Stone with 11cm of high only speaks
something what is important and now. Nothing will be change. Her
head, arms and legs were neglected. It seems that is no matter how
we look, what we think or what we do. We must be link in the chain.
Our identity is picture of ours attempts to be happy in that duty.
Rahotep and his wife. Woman must to go step by step with
her man and be beautiful always. Her dress and makeup is
mask with witch she deceive men. In his life she played a
secondary role always no matter how he loves her.

Nefertiti kingtress. But if we see here alone, she is like sun.

She is dignified and shining. Lock at this picture And this is
a woman with role wich she plays very successfully. Beautiful
actress (aplausse). At moment it seems that she do what she
want to do, something what she think to do for good all of us,
but she still is only victim of regulations. She is not free
woman.

Kora is a picture of woman in Arhaic period of Grece. She has dressed

but under that we can see line of her body. I dont know exactly why
we see a nude body of men (in that period) but not same nudity of
women. At the first time when I have a situation to talk with some of
archeologist I will ask him or her for that. In fact we should see ideal
of beauty for that time. If I say now that it is a form of how man see
woman I will sin of his inability to make real figure of woman whit all
her beauty.
It is true that the man of classic period knows to enjoy in her body
and she was enjoying as occupation of his view and enjoyment.

Niobida na umoru This is real figure of woman. Now we

will see Niobida at the moment of dead. I love that
figure! It is very beautiful until we see her pain. Look at
her face. She had 7 dauthers and 7 sons and boasted of
that to Apolons mother. But because of that Apolon was
angry and throw arrows to her. Now we see moment
when she fill arrow on her back and go with hands to
back, to point of pain. That is instinctive movement. At
that moment her dress was throw down and create a
beautiful composition of light and darkness. Now you are
seeing one of the best beautiful nude body in art for me.

Whether she is Eva, Atina or Madona, she is symbol before all.

In this case she is mother who loves, take care, or play with
her children (on some icons you can see the last what I just
wrote). Picture of saintress have a nimbus as only important
thing which make difference from woman from folk. Without
individual characteristic this is one mothers mirror with all
her emotions.
Centuries later Madona will getting face of woman from folk.

She is Judita. Shes dress flutters on breeze until she swing with hips. Judita is
tranquil and proud. Her attributes talk us that her sword bring a peace for her
people. Now she is bringing voice about salvation. Head of dead Holoferno is wore
by her servant. A few moment ago Judita killed a Holoferno who was a blocker of

her city.
She is beauty, elegant and strong picture of woman.