You are on page 1of 5
PASS / FAIL / INCOMPLETE St. Thomas University School of Education, Fredericton, NB CANADA ESB 563 NoT CONFIDENTIAL ONCE COMPLETED E TO CO-OPERATING TEACHER: Completed forms will be collected by tt Placemont Supervisor. Completed copies of this form should not be given to student: please discuss with interns areas where improvements are indicated as well as areas of proficiency. Also, you may wish to use the content of this evaluation to prepare a reference letter for the intern at the end of the field placement. Thank you for mentoring our students. he University Field s. However, B.Ed, FIELD PLACEMENT CO-OPERATING TEACHER'S EVALUATION FORM (Please provide complete written summary for employer and certification requests) Student's Name: Co-operating Teacher: School: Grado/Subject Area(s): ‘ide one Fiold Placements Dates: . 1_Nov/Dec orl This evaluation form is to be used by Co-operating Teachers when assessing the professional practice of the B.Ed. Intern at the end of a field placement. This form may also be used by B.Ed. Interns as a self-evaluation tool. Using the scale below, please rate the B.Ed. Intern in terms of the following domains: Planning and Preparation Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities and Readiness Please add comments in the various categories. B.Ed, Intern Rating Scale 4. Weak: improvements necessary 2, Adequate - satisfactory performance; improvements desirable 3. Good - competent performance; only minor recommendations for improvement 4, Strong - more than competent performance St. Thomas University | B.Ed. Co-operating Teacher Evaluation Form 2013-2014 TEL: (506) 452-0644 FAX: (506) 452-0611 PART ONE: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Planning and preparation of lessons: 10203 @ m rns erica eae [end ammeter eet ee ee advance and ents Ae Clear; Selected learning actvitioe are oomctent wan ‘objectives; lessons are planned in Needed m. ING carefully designed to motivate and sustain interest and maximize student involvement and learning; [eee iets ae tat mes Coe Oe lwo” Aone Pr cel prepared in 2. Demonstrates knowledge of students: 1 2 3 (4) reteset, show an understanding that each age gu has crn evelopmenial characteristics ~ Stugonis S208! and emotional. Displays in lesson plas Sn undertanclin of he ieee haat styles of stipes ( Loves diferent borcning. stybks and _behavicur., LOC iC ~, 3. Demonstrates knowledge of content: 1 2 @ “& is competent in the subject area; demonstrates an understanding ofthe discipline itself; designs lessons in such a av, to develop in students the skis, thought processes, and atts assodated nin earings oe weg ee "pach the content of the dace, nels stent ace te rebinsips cn dspne to aera Ditcing this Tiel" Binremint “cite ie aouven by COS RAM TTC is is et Te cxpecherv f i ated in jon: ®.- 4. Planning for differentiated instruction: 1 2 &) a) Seeks fo be aware of student strengths and weaknesses; observes student interests and individual needs; works effectively with abiity or interest groupings within the classroom; sets objecives and plans lessons aha assignments that are aporopriate to abities of students and allow for maximum student partcpation in learning ctvilles. Seleets instructional goals that are suitable for divers students, Bent expecdarions cue iy 5. Assessing students learning: 1 2 id when re-teaching may be necessary: seeks essment is used to plan instruction. Determines where an 9 Y; Seeks to tearm about te use of dfforng evaluation procedures, wih awareness of ite positive features and the limitations f vot Jenner Inllows well the vissecsnynls exealee| f Bi point OCT BCR Opp a Ka availabe: in the seeend placerend feacher Evaluation Form 2013-2014 ‘St. Thomas University | B.Ed. Co-operating Teach TEL: (506) 452-0646 FAX: (506) 452-0614 PART TWO: CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT 1. Interaction with students: : ae © Demonstrates caring and respect for individual students. Teacher conveys enthusiasm for the subject. Demonstrates rest ect for students ind personal development besides their academic prograse: ‘and genuine interest in students’ social and ps tanto iy ns . ( PATNA ui unkrest in the well beng 2. Classroom Management: 1 2 3 () Handles routine procedures smoothly and efficiently; plans carefully so as to avoid confusion during non-routine Procedures; plans lessons that keep students involved and occupied; recognizes when disciplinary action is called for and when it is not; utilizes appropriate disciplinary techniques’ when necessary; maintains an atmosphere Conducive to learning; is decisive and fair: models self-discipline. Respond to misbehavior in effective ways and is a to teers) individual needs. i onl eee. Alors popving pnd has developedt foun oir pint erage 3. Organization of Physical Space: 1 2 3 © Uses physical space affectely to create an environment conducive to learning X Siident workspaces orcaniced PART THRE! 4. Presentatio Appropriate to level, ability, and interests of students; utilizes @ variety of teaching strategies, techniques, and learning aids; is aware when students do not understand and makes appropriate attempts at clarification; communicates ideas in a clear and interesting manner; provides clear and accurate instruction and articulates tern fits well into a qrack_cre._eaching CUSSION. SJ writ 2. Oral and Written language: Quality of spokenturitten English: 1 23 © Quality of spoken/written French (FSL classroom only) 1 2 3 4 I Ct ‘St. Thomas University | B.Ed. Co-operating Teacher Evaluation Form 2013-2014 TEL: (606) 452-0644 FAX: (606) 452-0611 ene 55 3. Engaging Students in Learning: Asks high Hoh quality quest epresents true Srscues ga Provides adequate time for students to respond. Classroom interaction process, Succ eat lows students to mate topics and make unsolicited contributions to the learning ful Jag to students’ prior knowiog oa Students in the learning process. Provides instruction that makes connections Problems, ; 19@ and experiences. Engages students in applying content knowledge to real world ty WW she ( a Lote ty A trerhiby menws 4. acu i Activities and assignments: ‘ > ; Activities and as: Groups are mega tanMents are appropriate for students and the instructional goals of the lesson. Instructional Productive. Pacing of the lesson is consistent. Uses a variety of appropriate instructional strategies to Imaget the nepds of al stusentg stuoniley een folobr with whele clase small PEO Oia ihe 5. Assessment for learning: 1 2 3 @ Provides eppatunts or suet moni tha on earns, Proves feedback stidens. dae Gpprnpicde lve + whl PART FOUR: PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND READINESS 4. Commitment to teaching: 1. 8 8 © Interested in the feld and in learning new teaching techniques; concerned about students and helping them to tegen: wiling to-do more than the minimure require of @ teacher, yt mt Aika PD epperiunnies. C's aad laff wee fings a Professional attitude and manner: 1 2 3 4) a oe eset Cree Cermorickhy and Communicate welt? 3. Openness to constructive criticism, new ideas, 1 2 3 @) methods; does self-critique 4 Ailing ie ny ye things 4, Relationship with school personnel: 1028 ae Shares in the non-teaching dutesitasks reguifed of teachers; is supportive of other teachers; is a co-operative Staff member; uses effectively he support staff ofthe schoo} Hoge ee ete ced well Willy CHaers and + Ta) lon cites 5 Oder SUPE A Spice! —$ TS 5. Dependability) it epen punct di w & Mnitiativersoltstarting 123 7. Enthusiasm for tea 2 3 ; Rrofessional Suitabi i 5 3 . Accepts responsil f i c y for ow I: 23 Comments: \ ; seonler ies willia te learn all Shy can 6 Plepore byiself {Rr he? awn closcnwn PROFESSIONAL READINESS 1. How ready is the intern to take on full teaching responsibilities? Jenner could easily prepare. ond implere ct doi olen in a arace cre Clossimcwm 2. What areas of strength did you observe during this field placement? O Jenner was ate Guang hrc non-teaching tins 4o lea all sh» cad. 7Tn addon, sly has a kind, canng way with students. 3. In what areas the B.Ed. Intern-heeds additional work? Number of Days Absent:_(7 Overall Rating: 5,9 Overall Comments: TL would reepmevnd Jenner fir a classam Te ee Ales Date LALe Cooperating Teacher's Signature ‘i "J St. Thomas University | B.Ed. Co-operating Teacher Evaluation Form 2013-2014 [ TEL: (606) 452-0644 FAX: (606) 452-0611

You might also like