Both the Reading and the Listening talk about the doubt of the astronomers in agree

whether Pluto is really a real planet or not. The information in the Listening
contrasts that given in the Reading. This essay will describes these differences in
more detail.
First of all, the Reading says that there are 3 criteria to decide what is a real planet.
The first point was that to be a planet, it have to orbit the sun. The second criteria is
that it must be round. The last point is that it must domain the region of its orbit.
So, the astronomers decide that Pluto is not a real planet. However, the listening
contrasts this because it says that the decision of the scientists was not unanim.
Pluto has characteristics of a real planet.
Secondly, the reading says that the astronomers point that in fact, Pluto is a dwarf
planet, and not a real planet. On the other hand, the Listening says that calling
Pluto as a dwarf planet is not necessary, and it can cause confusion, because since
long time ago it has been calling of a Planet, and with this new decision they have
to change books in schools, and a lot of other Scientifics stuffs.
So, its clear that the Listening contrasts the Reading in several ways.