Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HOTELS IN INDIA
TRENDS & OPPORTUNITIES
Achin Khanna
Managing Director,
MRICS
Karan Sahani
Associate
HVS.com
HVS 6th Floor, Building 8-C, DLF Cyber City, Phase - II, Gurgaon 122 002, INDIA
A bend in the road is not the end of the roadUnless you fail to make the turn.
Helen Keller
creating affable diplomatic ties with
neighbouring countries in Southeast Asia.
That being said, the recent disconnection of
bilateral talks with Pakistan coupled with the
repeated cease-fire violations along the
Indo-Pak border lead one to question the
likelihood of a peaceful future with our
neighbours.
Introduction
Change is inevitable, continuous and more
often than not, required! As we publish this
year's edition of the Trends & Opportunities
report, it comes on the heels of a historic and
monumental mandate that was awarded to
the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance by
the citizens of India in the recently
concluded General Elections. In sharp
contrast to last years greatly subdued
outlook for business, there is a general sense
of hope, optimism and positivity today.
151
150
131
129
1,000
124
137
129
128
133
126
160
130
133
126
122
127
122
127
140
122
120
120
800
100
600
80
60
400
40
200
20
/0
03
20
/0
04
20
/0
Number of Hotels
05
20
/0
06
20
/0
07
20
/0
08
20
/0
09
20
/1
10
20
/1
11
20
/1
12
993
02
814
861
20
/0
717
01
551
698
20
/0
462
586
00
407
495
349
495
20
/0
316
357
99
268
348
252
335
19
/9
235
312
98
211
289
215
19
/9
271
97
199
256
19
/9
255
96
199
174
216
19
/9
180
232
163
214
95
122
183
120
182
19
20
/1
20
13
/1
12.0%
70
10.0%
60
50
8.0%
40
6.0%
30
4.0%
20
2.0%
10
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
Tourism Overview
Since 2002, when India's National Tourism
Policy was revamped, the country has
witnessed sustained growth that has
consistently outpaced the global tourism
industry in terms of growth in the volume of
international tourists as well as the overall
growth in revenue. The main drivers of this
increase have been the burgeoning Indian
middle class, growth in high spending
foreign tourists, and coordinated
government tourism campaigns like
Incredible India.
2013/14
Inflation (WPI)
64.8%
80.0%
68.8%
70.0%
57.2%
57.2%
53.9%
71.5% 71.4%
69.0%
59.3%
60.6%
59.5% 59.5%
57.8%
51.6%
58.9% 60.0%
50.0%
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10,000
-
10.0%
19
99
/0
20
0
00
/0
20
1
01
/0
20
2
02
/0
20
3
03
/0
20
4
04
/0
20
5
05
/0
20
06
/0
20
7
07
/0
20
8
08
20
/0
09
/1
20
0
10
/1
20
1
11
/1
20
2
12
/1
20
3
13
/1
Occupancy
65.0%
63.9%
63.4%
63.1%
62.3%
62.5%
60.3%
60.0%
59.4%
59.3%
62.3%
6,750
61.8%
6,500
60.2%
60.1%
6,250
59.0%
58.9%
58.0%
6,000
57.8%
57.5%
5,750
5,500
55.0%
5,250
5,000
52.5%
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
5,400
65.0%
63.9%
62.8%
62.0%
5,150
60.0%
57.7%
52.5%
54.1%
55.0%
53.2%
52.4%
4,900
50.0%
46.6%
44.2%
44.7%
45.0%
42.6%
41.8%
39.0%
40.0%
4,650
38.3%
4,400
35.0%
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
The trend continues to reflect the fact that reinvigorated overseas interest in India, and
existing hotels have grown (or at the very one is beginning to witness an overall
least sustained) their occupancies through positivity in the sentiments of people,
the so-called down cycle over the past five businesses and nations at large. The Indian
years. When one studies a market's overall stock markets are at their lifetime peak and
occupancy, it may seem like the numbers are financial pundits are speculating a
declining; however, it is evident from Figure continued and sustained bull-run, this time
4 that the decline is primarily a function of possibly for the medium-to-long term. The
the new supply's lower initial-year recent union budget's approval of additional
occupancies that are in turn pulling down FDI in the defence and insurance sectors
the marketwide average. When looked at only adds to the already approved FDI limit
independently, not only has existing supply increases to retail. The likelihood of
proven its ability to retain and/or grow its significant amounts of foreign money
occupancy numbers, even new supply pouring into our country is now strong.
continues to show a steady (albeit relatively Stability at the centre is therefore very likely
paced) year on year growth in occupancies, to catalyse overall growth in the Gross
as is visible in Figure 5. However, similar to Domestic Product (GDP) over the next threelast year, we continue to see declines in to-five years.
average room rates. While one may partially
attribute this to markets having a larger pool While average room rates have declined
of budget and midmarket
across various prominent
hotels in their competitive set O n a n a t i o nw i d e b a s i s , markets lately, absolute
now, when we study the charts branded and/or organised demand in terms of room
above it is clear that the advent supply grew at a CAGR of n i g h t s p e r d a y ( R P D )
of new supply is also causing 17.8% over the past five years. c o n t i n u e s t o g ro w. O u r
Demand for these rooms grew
existing hotels to cut their at 17.6% for the same period. research reveals that demand
rates in a bid to retain business.
for organised rooms has grown
This knee-jerk reaction is often
at an average of 11.3% over the
a short-sighted approach to doing business past decade. This time period witnessed an
and we discuss this in more detail in the up-cycle from 2003 to mid 2008 and a downfollowing paragraphs.
cycle from late 2008 to 2013. However, yearon-year demand grew in the double-digits
during both cycles. This in itself is testament
Back to the Future!
to the inherent strength of the sector and its
As we look to the future, one must first pay continuing potential to grow, even in the face
h e e d t o p o l i t i c a l a n d e c o n o m i c of external adversities. We are of the view
developments in the last few months. The that demand is likely to continue growing in
BJP-led NDA's historic victory has not only the double-digits for the next three-to-five
captured India's imagination but also years.
Hotel Operators
In our various conversations with General
Managers, Directors of Sales & Marketing
and Revenue heads
of hotels across While average room rates
brands, we have have declined across various
repeatedly heard prominent markets lately,
them worry about absolute demand in terms of
room nights per day (RPD)
i n c r e a s i n g c o n t i n u e s t o g r ow. O u r
competition and the research reveals that demand
inevitability of why for organised rooms has
grown at an average of 11.3%
average room rates over the past decade.
just had to be
corrected if they
wanted to retain business. It is evident that
hotels across positioning and price points
have dropped rates in a bid to gain business
over the last two-to-three years and rate
wars have led to some surprising decisions
being made by respectable and globally
recognised brands.
Like last year, we reiterate in this year's
publication India does NOT have a rate
problem! If anything, we are often too afraid
to charge a fair price for the product and
service being offered, because the
management feels that they will lose critical
business unless they offer the lowest rate in
town. As we look towards the advent of an
up-cycle in the near future, HVS would like to
strongly urge management companies
international and domestic alike to look
one step beyond. Focusing on value creation
for your guests rather than simply offering
the lowest room rate needs to be the strategy
going forward. Today's customer is far more
informed and educated about various hotel
positioning and is therefore able to
appreciate the differences that exist
between a budget, midmarket and upscale
brand. He or she is also both able and willing
to pay what's fair for products offered and
services rendered. Now that this maturity is Hotel Developers & Investors
coming about in the profile of guests, may
we suggest that hotels be true to their Building when a market is in distress so that
one may operate when the market picks up
positioning and target
makes common sense.
consumers with the confidence
It is evident that hotels across However, we are often
that they have the ability to
positioning and price points
appreciate their product and have dropped rates in a bid to surprised when developers
and investors cite poor
gain business over the last
services.
two-to-three years and rate market conditions as their
wars have led to some
Additionally, please do not forget surprising decisions being primary reason for not
MICE! Both corporate and social made by respectable and wanting to build hotels. If
your intent is to build, then
consumption of hotels for events globally recognised brands.
commencing
work on your
is on the rise. Hotels across
project now would be a good
positioning must pay heed to the
additional revenue that the meetings and idea. It takes anywhere from three-to-five
conferences segment can generate for their years to construct a hotel in India. Figures 6
business. What you may have to give away in and 7 provide a snapshot of development
room rate could often be mitigated by way of costs per key and construction tenures
increased F&B spends. Thirdly, domestic for over 200 hotels that have opened in
leisure is certainly growing and is willing to India over the past five years.
spend. Target them, encourage them and
rely on them more than you have in the
past. Creating packages for the domestic
consumer will help hotels across all
positioning in today's India. Lastly, since
earning customer loyalty is your goal,
effective management of your loyalty
programs will certainly help in value
creation.
Implementing a combination of ideas
discussed above will help you in creating
value that today's well travelled, educated
and discerning consumer will likely
appreciate, and dropping average rates may
not need to be your primary means of
securing business.
80
Lenders
The hotel sector is either not understood or
misunderstood by banks public and
private sector alike in India. They have
traditionally either extended loans based on
their prior relationship with a borrower or
because they have a mandate to lend a
certain amount to a certain sector in a
certain year. Of late, they have been shying
away from lending to hotel developers
because they fear the relatively poor
performance of hotels that have not been
able to service their debt obligations and
have ended up as Non Performing Assets
(NPA) in their books.
However, not many lending institutions have
recognised the fact that the problem doesn't
lie in the hotel sector. Instead, it was their
approach to lending
( a s e x p l a i n e d As we look towards the advent
above) that was the of an up-cycle in the near
primary reason for future, HVS would like to
strongly urge management
the situation they companies international and
find themselves in domestic alike to look one
today. Much like step beyond. Focusing on
a n y t h i n g e l s e , value creation for your guests
rather than simply offering
lending based on the lowest room rate needs to
the fundamentals of be the strategy going forward.
the project , the
conditions of the
market it will operate in, the reputation of
the developer and the viability of its cash
flows to service debt should all be the
yardsticks for lending. Additionally, rather
than fearing the down-cycle, lenders must
lend during this period, so that hotels may
open by the time the up-cycle arrives.
72
65
60
40
49
36
54
49
35
48
34
50
43
36
35
30
18
20
29
18
22
13
Luxury
Upper Upscale
Upscale
Upper Midscale
Midscale
Budget
Economy
Positioning
Minimum
Maximum
Weighted Average
Development Cost/Key
425
400
Survey Results
350
(` Lakh)
300
232
250
200
200
150
100
178
159
139
99
124
88
82
46
50
60
28
45
14
52
18
31
11
28 16
Luxury
Upper Upscale
Upscale
Minimum
Upper Midscale
Midscale
Budget
Positioning
Maximum
Weighted Average
Economy
5.4%
7.8%
7.7%
-4.1%
3,119
1,991
1,849
3,252
3,354
1,714
3,348
3,255
3,530
3,488
3,012
2,212
1,830
1,670
1,669
1,696
1,673
* The 2012/13 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2013/14 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2012/13
Source: HVS Research
1,505
1,457
1,543
1,212
Three-star
1,432
1,418
Four-star
Two-star
6.5%
-5.8%
4,417
4,691
4,905
4,905
4,638
5,745
5,722
5,111
3,847
3,088
2,580
2,246
2,368
2,392
2,168
2,296
2,538
2,515
1,825
4.4%
4.6%
-4.2%
5,635
5,881
6,135
6,380
6,410
7,268
7,652
6,506
4,985
3,897
3,372
3,114
3,277
3,447
3,368
3,516
3,315
3.4%
Five-star
3,044
-2.3%
-4.3%
5,531
8,774
8,982
5,779
6,032
9,189
9,350
6,513
6,489
9,277
11,096
7,722
7,989
11,200
9,778
7,071
5,444
7,168
5,606
4,299
3,569
4,686
4,335
3,269
3,467
4,668
5,102
3,731
3,505
4,910
5,572
3,903
3,986
5,613
4,991
3,688
3,025
4,019
Five-star Deluxe
2012/13* 2013/14
2011/12
1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11
* The 2012/13 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2013/14 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2012/13
Source: HVS Research
Two-star
Overall Average
12-Month** Compounded
Change
Growth
-2.3%
4.7%
61.8%
59.0%
64.8%
0.7%
0.0%
-0.1%
2.7%
58.4%
57.9%
57.9%
56.8%
56.9%
60.0%
60.7%
58.5%
55.5%
60.3%
58.5%
56.2%
64.7%
68.9%
71.7%
68.9%
65.9%
72.7%
71.8%
56.7%
59.6%
68.7%
56.4%
53.6%
49.7%
52.7%
58.7%
48.8%
47.7%
53.2%
55.9%
48.2%
47.0%
58.2%
51.5%
Three-star
49.2%
57.9%
Four-star
60.5%
-0.8%
4.9%
58.1%
55.4%
59.1%
61.9%
58.6%
58.5%
67.2%
70.2%
70.4%
71.1%
66.8%
57.0%
51.4%
56.1%
55.7%
56.4%
58.5%
67.5%
Five-star
65.7%
-1.1%
-0.7%
1.9%
0.6%
60.5%
58.9%
57.8%
60.1%
59.8%
60.9%
60.6%
59.5%
61.6%
62.5%
59.5%
68.8%
71.7%
73.0%
71.4%
71.5%
73.8%
71.4%
69.0%
64.8%
65.0%
59.3%
57.2%
51.6%
52.2%
60.9%
57.2%
53.9%
58.3%
60.2%
55.4%
57.1%
62.9%
62.0%
59.3%
66.5%
74.0%
Overall Average
Five-star Deluxe
2011/12
1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11
2012/13* 2013/14
67.6%
12-Month** Compounded
Change
Growth
36.3
42.2
43.5
35
47.2
36
50
69
99
73
48.2
35
47
65
90
68
1,698
821
624
Five-star Deluxe
Five-star
Four-star
Three-star
2,320
705
1,104
2,000
3,374
725
1,477
1,939
3,480
2,276
2,162
702
1,283
1,983
3,354
718
1,153
1,876
2,863
1,889
816
1,404
1,934
3,107
2,134
2000/01
31
25
19
Four-star
Three-star
42.2
43.5
* The 2012/13 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2013/14 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2012/13
36.3
16
27
43
44.9
18
31
43
69
48
40.2
87
142
190
278
199
45.9
77
125
158
242
168
1,789
843
1,248
1,684
2,437
895
1,267
1,775
2,571
1,870
2,313
1,038
2,217
2,771
4,003
2,966
3,892
1,458
2,797
3,509
5,290
2,075
3,665
4,567
7,138
5,049
2,257
3,942
5,142
8,030
5,496
1,985
3,362
4,250
6,933
4,598
47.2
18
26
36
52
38
48.2
19
26
37
53
39
46.0
22
39
49
66
50
44.9
23
49
62
89
66
44.5
33
63
79
119
87
43.6
48
84
105
164
116
40.2
56
98
128
200
137
45.9
43
73
93
151
100
995
1,772
2,252
3,046
45.6
73
108
140
205
143
1,959
2,977
3,949
5,694
3,947
47.7
38
59
79
120
81
45.6
43
65
87
125
87
2009/10 2010/11
1,806
2,797
3,756
5,715
3,861
2009/10 2010/11
47.7
68
97
134
194
136
70
102
128
192
126
54.5
34
60
86
108
165
106
1,091
1,848
2,718
3,257
5,398
3,343
40
61
76
114
75
54.5
20
34
50
60
99
61
2011/12 2012/13*
1,110
1,909
2,942
3,626
5,491
3,575
2011/12 2012/13*
48.0
35.4
18
34
44
43
66
43.6
69
117
149
224
162
Exchange Rate
20
41
53
50
77
44.5
50
86
112
161
122
23
20
63
96
2000/01
44.9
41
69
87
125
96
Two-star
32.4
58
53
Five-star
95
92
Five-star Deluxe
66
62
Overall Average
46.0
36
56
73
102
78
* The 2012/13 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2013/14 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2012/13
Two-star
2,012
2,974
Overall Average
44.9
37
53
77
114
83
60.7
20
30
42
54
87
54
2013/14
1,230
1,821
2,557
3,274
5,306
3,260
2013/14
60.7
33
51
73
93
145
91
48.0
35.4
37
50
77
113
81
* The 2012/13 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2013/14 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2012/13
32.4
43
61
79
128
90
2009/10 2010/11
Exchange Rate
40
70
91
155
110
36
37
Three-star
52
89
141
104
2000/01
Two-star
78
44
Four-star
124
Five-star Deluxe
Five-star
93
Overall Average
Figure 10: Key Operating Characteristics by Hotel Classification Average Rate (US$)
1.1%
-11.6%
-15.6%
-9.8%
-11.8%
-12.5%
12-Month**
Change
12.7%
-1.5%
-5.9%
0.5%
-1.7%
-2.5%
12-Month**
Change
-3.4%
-14.0%
-15.5%
-14.0%
-12.4%
-14.1%
12-Month**
Change
-6.4%
2.6%
2.8%
0.1%
-0.3%
-0.8%
Compounded
Growth
5.3%
6.1%
6.5%
3.7%
3.3%
2.7%
Compounded
Growth
-4.2%
1.8%
2.8%
1.0%
0.9%
-0.1%
Compounded
Growth
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
12-Month*
Change
Compounded
Growth
Ahmedabad
1,336
519
1,336
675
1,419
800
1,439
1,521
1,439
1,785
1,739
1,975
1,299
2,477
1,293
2,777
-0.5%
12.1%
-0.5%
27.1%
Bengaluru
Chennai **
2,414
2,442
3,456
2,826
3,889
3,307
5,597
3,806
5,947
4,066
7,713
4,904
8,536
6,330
9,877
7,105
15.7%
12.2%
22.3%
16.5%
Delhi ***
Gurgaon **
NOIDA**
7,990
9,019
8,625
8,129
1,980
9,111
3,246
10,697
3,782
11,338
4,559
12,025
5,190
6.1%
13.8%
6.0%
27.2%
Goa **
2,450
2,768
2,795
300
3,288
351
3,375
527
3,885
841
4,406
1,119
4,553
33.1%
3.3%
39.0%
9.3%
Hyderabad **
Jaipur **
1,868
1,388
2,554
1,556
2,761
1,683
3,782
2,472
4,036
2,554
4,797
3,054
5,411
4,129
5,900
4,523
9.0%
9.5%
17.9%
18.4%
Kolkata
Mumbai
Pune b
1,354
7,402
777
1,396
8,454
1,346
1,373
7,948
1,518
1,520
9,877
2,672
1,588
11,303
4,691
1,787
12,052
5,672
2,163
12,807
5,317
2,243
13,022
6,159
3.7%
1.7%
15.8%
7.5%
8.4%
34.4%
Agra a
9,345
11,596
12,357
15,412
18,039
21,729
24,642
28,069
13.9%
17.0%
Total
39,285
46,982
48,475
61,795
71,531
84,313
94,255
103,855
10.2%
14.9%
Figure 14: Top Twenty Hotel Brands by Existing Inventory September 2014
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
r)
ge
Gin
es
es
,R
la
Pa
in
s(
ce
&
rts
d
clu
s
tel
ITC
Ho
e)
un
es
d
clu
rt
Fo
id
(in
on
rls
Ca
z
Re
dH
ls
ote
oo
rw
Sta
ort
rou
lG
ote
H
or
&
s
Re
rr
Ma
al
att
Hy
ort
on
ati
n
ter
t In
iot
ls
ote
&
s
Re
ar
rov
Sa
ls
ote
&
s
Re
ls
ote
&
iH
ero
Ob
lH
nta
rou
lG
ote
tin
on
rC
e
Int
s
Re
s
tel
ort
ort
co
Ac
e
Tre
on
Le
am
&
s
Re
la
ee
ls
ote
s, H
ce
la
Pa
ort
&
s
Re
id
ya
Ro
rch
lO
ou
Gr
o
jH
it
ton
ls
ote
&
s
Re
me
lop
ve
ism
De
ls
tio
ora
orp
C
nt
Hil
ort
aL
eL
Th
eL
Th
s
tel
ls
ote
dh
n
Wy
ort
Ho
t
rn
ali
ste
pit
We
os
st
tH
p
e
nc
Co
ote
eH
oic
Ch
Be
ia
Ind
u
To
Ta
Future Supply
Over the years, HVS has followed a
comprehensive approach for tracking new
hotel development. We would like to state
that a lot of effort goes into collating this data
and then verifying many of these projects
across various cities in terms of their
development stage. Our tracking omits any
flippant statements made to the media or
announcements made by real estate
developers to promote their brand and,
therefore, get greater visibility. Thus, as
we do each year, we have put together a
list of developments under construction
or those announced in each market that
have a confirmed tie-up with an operator.
Such developments have been analysed
rationally, through the prism of an
unbiased third party, for the probability
factor of their development within the
next five years.
From 114,466 proposed branded rooms in
2007/08 - the highest in the last seven years,
the total proposed supply was down to
68,050 rooms as of the close of 2013/14, the
lowest since 2006/07. Considering this in
conjunction with the 121% growth in
existing supply over the same period, one
can attribute the decline in proposed supply
partially to a substantial number of
Figure 15: Proposed Branded Hotel Rooms Across Major Cities (2013/14 2018/19)
Existing Supply
2013/14
Proposed
Supply
Increase in
Future Supply
Active Development
of Supply
Luxury
Upscale
Midmarket
Budget
Extended Stay
Agra
1,293
990
77%
82%
0.0%
0.0%
82.4%
17.6%
0.0%
Ahmedabad
2,777
1,372
49%
86%
0.0%
43.4%
43.5%
0.0%
13.1%
Bengaluru
9,877
6,911
70%
66%
18.9%
26.5%
24.9%
17.6%
12.1%
Chennai
7,105
3,885
55%
80%
3.9%
5.3%
46.0%
37.9%
6.9%
Delhi
12,025
5,355
45%
71%
8.4%
31.6%
37.0%
18.4%
4.7%
Gurgaon
5,190
3,268
63%
54%
18.4%
11.8%
44.7%
17.7%
7.3%
NOIDA
1,119
2,406
215%
70%
10.4%
55.4%
10.6%
23.6%
0.0%
Goa
4,553
2,291
50%
68%
13.9%
14.6%
39.5%
32.0%
0.0%
Hyderabad
5,900
2,893
49%
78%
0.0%
6.2%
49.3%
39.0%
5.5%
Jaipur
4,523
1,706
38%
82%
3.4%
37.1%
47.4%
12.1%
0.0%
Kolkata
2,243
2,584
115%
72%
17.4%
35.0%
25.3%
22.3%
0.0%
Mumbai
13,022
7,896
61%
49%
23.5%
23.4%
26.7%
22.6%
3.8%
Pune
6,159
2,620
43%
72%
21.4%
0.0%
53.1%
25.6%
0.0%
Other Cities
28,069
23,873
85%
71%
1.5%
17.8%
46.6%
33.0%
1.0%
Total
103,855
68,050
72%
69%
9.3%
20.8%
39.7%
26.4%
3.6%
Figure 16: Distribution of Existing and Proposed Branded Hotel Rooms Across Major Cities (2006/07 2013/14)
Existing Supply
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Proposed Supply
2012/13
2013/14
2006/07
1,336
1,336
1,419
1,439
1,439
1,739
1,299
1,293
764
670
400
510
667
650
866
990
32%
55%
75%
41%
22%
80%
76%
82%
519
675
800
1,521
1,785
1,975
2,477
2,777
2,230
3,664
3,058
2,339
2,319
2,550
1,857
1,372
60%
47%
71%
69%
73%
69%
66%
86%
Bengaluru
2,414
3,456
3,889
5,597
5,947
7,713
8,536
9,877
12,882
15,542
10,784
9,819
12,509
9,716
10,731
6,911
61%
60%
58%
65%
67%
71%
75%
66%
Chennai
2,442
2,826
3,307
3,806
4,066
4,904
6,330
7,105
6,213
7,147
4,945
5,995
7,819
7,547
5,331
3,885
68%
71%
67%
72%
57%
58%
65%
80%
Delhi
7,990
9,019
8,625
8,129
9,111
10,697
11,338
12,025
19,423
22,360
16,560
20,021
18,608
5,626
6,144
5,355
56%
51%
53%
75%
75%
87%
84%
71%
1,980
3,246
3,782
4,559
5,190
5,818
5,033
3,268
55%
53%
54%
300
351
527
841
1,119
5,522
5,615
2,406
37%
28%
70%
Agra
Ahmedabad
Gurgaon
NOIDA
Goa
2,450
2,768
2,795
3,288
3,375
3,885
4,406
4,553
3,058
3,353
2,178
1,736
2,154
2,422
2,622
2,291
58%
42%
31%
41%
53%
53%
62%
68%
Hyderabad
1,868
2,554
2,761
3,782
4,036
4,797
5,411
5,900
10,619
8,250
5,884
5,302
5,713
5,265
3,433
2,893
47%
64%
73%
63%
77%
74%
87%
78%
Jaipur
1,388
1,556
1,683
2,472
2,554
3,054
4,129
4,523
4,012
2,937
3,357
2,664
4,867
3,356
2,859
1,706
56%
53%
53%
77%
45%
52%
56%
82%
Kolkata
1,354
1,396
1,373
1,520
1,588
1,787
2,163
2,243
3,644
5,965
4,025
3,481
3,612
3,118
3,511
2,584
67%
49%
62%
51%
58%
74%
64%
72%
Mumbai
7,402
8,454
7,948
9,877
11,303
12,052
12,807
13,022
11,578
10,613
13,386
7,477
12,121
10,896
9,802
7,896
49%
62%
73%
60%
35%
47%
42%
49%
777
1,346
1,518
2,672
4,691
5,672
5,317
6,159
8,072
8,243
8,054
5,196
5,545
4,645
3,705
2,620
77%
66%
52%
67%
56%
69%
67%
72%
Other Cities
9,345
11,596
12,357
15,412
18,039
21,729
24,642
28,069
19,476
25,722
21,484
24,909
26,504
26,224
23,141
23,873
58%
60%
60%
65%
56%
48%
55%
71%
Total
39,285
46,982
48,475
61,795
71,531
84,313
94,255
103,855
101,971
114,466 94,115
89,449
102,438 93,355
84,650
68,050
58%
58%
60%
67%
60%
58%
60%
69%
Pune
Figure 17: Proposed Branded Hotel Rooms Across Major Cities (2013/14 2018/19*)
18,000
16,920
15,817
16,000
14,458
14,000
13,022
12,025
12,000
10,205
9,877
10,000
8,165
8,000
7,105
6,103
6,000
5,190
2,109
2,000
2,777
4,523
2,810
1,293
6,159
5,929
5,900
4,553
3,955
4,000
8,048
6,943
4,109
2,243
1,119
ra
m
a
ed
Ah
ru
ba
Ag
Be
alu
ng
na
n
he
lh
De
o
ga
ur
2013/14
DA
I
NO
2018/19
ad
Go
ab
er
d
Hy
ur
ip
Ja
ta
ka
l
Ko
ba
um
ne
Pu
* The supply for 2018/19 has been computed by adding the active future supply to the existing base of rooms in 2013/14.
Source: HVS Research
-1.1%
-1.8%
4.0%
0.2%
66.9%
58.3%
64.3%
58.2%
63.7%
51.3%
0.7%
0.3%
0.0%
0.6%
72.0%
54.7%
54.7%
71.5%
70.0%
55.2%
0.7%
-0.5%
1.8%
7.5%
70.2%
53.0%
68.9%
49.3%
68.5%
54.0%
-7.7%
-2.5%
2.9%
21.1%
53.8%
59.6%
58.0%
44.4%
56.2%
-2.3%
-0.7%
-7.5%
2.2%
55.5%
63.1%
60.0%
61.7%
-0.2%
-1.1%
5.6%
0.9%
54.2%
58.7%
55.6%
53.7%
1.3%
2.9%
Growth
62.4%
46.7%
62.5%
50.9%
60.6%
62.2%
74.6%
69.5%
77.9%
83.4%
76.2%
83.1%
* The 2012/13 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2013/14 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2012/13
a Delhi NCR data (Shaded Portion) from 1995/96 to 2008/09, Delhi (without Gurgaon, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA) data from 2009/10 to 2013/14
72.0%
86.4%
69.7%
68.9%
63.4%
71.0%
52.0%
64.6%
64.5%
67.6%
65.3%
81.0%
Mumbai
Pune
73.0%
68.3%
57.7%
57.3%
67.5%
69.5%
54.1%
64.7%
73.9%
75.5%
65.5%
65.7%
76.4%
69.0%
67.2%
58.8%
62.8%
65.4%
44.9%
48.3%
66.4%
62.9%
55.0%
47.0%
54.8%
57.8%
45.6%
51.7%
52.2%
63.8%
Jaipur
Kolkata
58.4%
61.8%
72.2%
65.7%
72.8%
72.1%
67.8%
82.0%
62.5%
78.7%
59.3%
75.9%
60.5%
68.9%
53.6%
68.0%
60.6%
69.1%
53.3%
61.3%
58.6%
66.0%
59.2%
53.4%
58.4%
54.8%
62.1%
58.1%
55.9%
65.1%
53.3%
Goa
Hyderabad
67.7%
57.1%
80.7%
NOIDA
61.1%
55.8%
66.5%
66.0%
74.0%
Gurgaon
67.2%
68.7%
62.1%
68.3%
63.1%
67.3%
72.8%
73.9%
74.7%
76.9%
78.2%
80.8%
72.9%
79.1%
66.6%
73.1%
58.3%
60.4%
56.5%
53.3%
64.6%
58.9%
65.3%
52.9%
64.7%
54.1%
68.4%
60.2%
84.6%
71.7%
Chennai
a
Delhi
80.2%
67.3%
58.4%
54.3%
58.2%
53.2%
54.6%
61.2%
73.3%
65.3%
72.5%
67.9%
69.1%
76.7%
81.4%
68.3%
63.2%
78.5%
72.0%
53.8%
53.2%
64.3%
69.8%
55.8%
50.8%
64.4%
59.0%
58.0%
67.2%
61.2%
65.8%
55.7%
71.8%
60.2%
55.9%
52.4%
58.3%
58.9%
56.0%
57.1%
50.0%
30.7%
33.7%
2001/02
2000/01
42.5%
40.1%
46.4%
46.1%
71.3%
Ahmedabad
Bengaluru
1999/00
Overall, Kolkata retained its position as the bestperforming hotel market in terms of occupancy
(72.0%) in 2013/14, while Mumbai (including Navi
Mumbai) registered the highest average rate (`7,105)
and Goa recorded the highest RevPAR (`4,778)
amongst the 13 major markets being tracked in this report.
2002/03
51.7%
2003/04
2004/05
2005/06
2006/07
47.6%
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
Agra
2010/11
Trendline
1998/99
Number of Rooms
2018/19
62.0%
2013/14
1997/98
2000/01
65.7%
63.8%
56.6%
24,905
20,000
1996/97
40,000
2011/12 2012/13*
60,000
59.9%
80,000
60.6%
103,855
100,000
1995/96
120,000
2013/14
140,000
58.9%
160,000
57.1%
150,702
180,000
Change
200,000
12-Month** Compounded
6,169
6,297
5,661
3,557
5,555
3,698
4,932
3,409
2,949
2,603
4,184
2,917
2,728
2,805
4,356
3,021
2,980
69
46
47
96
159
Gurgaon
NOIDA
Goa
Hyderabad
Jaipur
Kolkata
Mumbai
Exchange Rate
35.4
52
100
176
66
45
89
100
113
52
76
1996/97
36.3
68
109
170
63
45
95
110
135
56
50
1997/98
42.2
62
88
138
73
39
81
89
111
50
53
1998/99
43.5
45
82
130
63
43
70
79
95
38
62
1999/00
44.9
65
82
124
65
52
80
85
101
35
61
2000/01
47.2
62
72
104
57
51
79
75
92
39
50
2001/02
48.2
54
57
61
87
57
53
78
67
85
41
45
2002/03
3,985
78
44.9
46.0
77
72
107
89
84
166
83
114
67
62
2004/05
3,521
4,822
3,240
3,461
3,772
61
65
66
95
67
60
105
72
93
53
52
2003/04
* The 2012/13 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2013/14 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2012/13
a Delhi NCR data (Shaded Portion) from 1995/96 to 2008/09, Delhi (without Gurgaon, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA) data from 2009/10 to 2013/14
32.4
71
86
94
Bengaluru
Chennai
a
Delhi
Pune
49
66
Agra
Ahmedabad
1995/96
Figure 21: Key Operating Characteristics by Major Cities Average Rate (US$)
* The 2012/13 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2013/14 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2012/13
a Delhi NCR data (Shaded Portion) from 1995/96 to 2008/09, Delhi (without Gurgaon, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA) data from 2009/10 to 2013/14
6,229
3,888
2,902
2,774
3,086
4,804
44.5
110
99
87
136
108
109
197
98
155
81
70
2005/06
4,915
6,041
3,887
4,407
4,870
5,801
43.6
150
121
121
200
133
137
239
123
211
108
81
2006/07
6,523
8,738
5,288
5,285
5,962
40.2
197
141
163
272
155
156
244
158
259
131
108
2007/08
7,946
10,932
6,575
5,664
6,271
6,255
6,271
45.9
163
130
146
233
137
137
207
145
214
116
104
2008/09
7,493
10,679
6,686
5,982
6,297
180
177
47.7
45.6
109
141
128
122
104
95
133
114
118
108
170
157
189
166
185
173
149
124
138
94
137
2010/11
4,949
8,194
6,408
4,718
5,173
6,056
7,752
7,554
8,634
5,632
6,776
6,243
4,285
2010/11
120
95
121
2009/10
5,810
8,428
6,087
4,539
5,146
5,137
3,951
2,514
2,541
2,754
8,834
5,710
6,597
5,773
4,540
2009/10
Mumbai
Pune
3,556
2,533
2,414
2,676
9,811
6,677
9,495
5,322
4,754
2008/09
3,104
2,473
2,316
2,914
10,429
6,340
9,827
5,262
4,351
2007/08
Kolkata
1,836
1,867
2,727
9,192
5,378
10,406
4,715
3,526
2006/07
1,518
1,579
2,863
6,909
4,357
8,762
3,622
3,111
2005/06
Jaipur
1,646
2,303
5,103
3,714
7,470
3,012
2,787
2004/05
5,613
1,604
2,347
4,269
3,323
4,832
2,431
2,410
2003/04
1,499
4,089
3,224
3,752
1,954
2,164
2002/03
2,220
4,338
3,535
3,735
1,840
2,354
2001/02
Hyderabad
4,526
3,796
3,602
1,586
2,736
2000/01
Goa
4,115
3,424
3,025
1,638
2,705
1999/00
8,247
4,626
3,600
3,254
1,906
2,220
1998/99
7,496
4,913
3,977
3,451
2,027
1,833
1997/98
NOIDA
4,007
3,540
3,136
1,826
2,678
1996/97
Gurgaon
3,054
2,779
Chennai
2,300
Bengaluru
Delhi
1,593
2,132
Agra
Ahmedabad
1995/96
Figure 20: Key Operating Characteristics by Major Cities Average Rate (`)
3,861
7,550
6,093
4,843
4,854
6,513
6,724
6,831
7,387
5,440
5,960
6,126
3,904
3,837
7,105
5,639
4,626
4,437
6,808
5,964
6,296
6,943
4,942
5,427
6,254
3,614
48.0
87
165
126
99
105
128
155
159
170
115
131
82
124
54.5
71
139
112
89
89
120
123
125
136
100
109
72
112
60.7
63
76
93
117
104
98
112
73
89
81
114
103
60
4,163
7,923
6,049
4,727
5,026
6,162
7,416
7,639
8,174
5,524
6,293
5,958
3,917
3.6%
1.8%
3.4%
6.4%
6.2%
6.4%
-5.6%
-6.5%
4.7%
3.2%
4.9%
7.9%
3.0%
-10.8%
-14.3%
-17.0%
-15.6%
-17.3%
-20.4%
-6.2%
-18.0%
-18.3%
-18.5%
-15.7%
-8.4%
-16.9%
1.4%
2.7%
-0.2%
-1.7%
-12.0%
-11.1%
2.7%
2.6%
1.3%
-0.3%
1.1%
4.2%
-0.6%
12-Month** Compounded
Change
Growth
-0.6%
-5.9%
-7.4%
-4.5%
-8.6%
4.5%
-11.3%
-7.8%
-6.0%
-9.2%
-8.9%
2.1%
-7.4%
12-Month** Compounded
Change
Growth
Chennai
3,257
4,223
7,069
4,017
7,544
2,394
2,777
2006/07
4,516
7,707
4,616
6,417
3,189
3,068
2007/08
3,829
6,600
4,210
5,181
2,908
2,790
2008/09
6,034
3,546
3,509
2,642
3,227
2009/10
4,161
Mumbai
4,547
1,988
4,028
2,442
1,279
4,257
2,247
1,155
1,042
3,651
1,949
1,182
1,144
3,589
2,326
1,596
1,600
2,565
2,264
1,424
1,642
1,848
2,653
1,908
1,225
1,751
1,933
3,036
1,897
1,752
2,105
90
61
135
42
38
2004/05
125
77
151
48
45
2005/06
162
92
173
55
64
2006/07
192
115
159
79
76
2007/08
144
91
113
64
61
2008/09
74
74
55
68
2009/10
83
87
51
82
2010/11
128
61
129
Kolkata
Mumbai
36.3
111
67
35
24
37
42.2
93
51
28
26
43
43.5
84
45
21
26
34
44.9
80
52
36
36
39
47.2
54
48
30
35
31
42
46.0
38
48.2
66
41
38
46
40
55
40
26
37
34
* The 2012/13 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2013/14 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2012/13
a Delhi NCR data (Shaded Portion) from 1995/96 to 2008/09, Delhi (without Gurgaon, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA) data from 2009/10 to 2013/14
Exchange Rate
35.4
30
56
25
Jaipur
32.4
25
27
Hyderabad
Pune
39
43
Goa
44.9
67
77
50
52
66
56
44.5
91
104
66
65
89
73
43.6
125
156
91
79
99
97
40.2
137
203
121
91
102
112
45.9
101
141
101
70
76
84
47.7
62
110
86
55
58
77
45.6
51
112
96
60
65
90
137
68
48
82
33
27
2003/04
2,311
5,113
4,377
2,722
2,954
116
51
39
56
24
13
2002/03
2,957
5,268
4,108
2,601
2,743
NOIDA
49
42
51
27
13
2001/02
4,661
6,473
4,648
3,234
3,515
130
59
55
56
34
15
2000/01
5,522
8,155
4,859
3,665
4,120
110
50
52
45
31
15
1999/00
5,440
6,807
3,992
3,462
4,299
114
60
58
48
31
23
1998/99
4,084
4,603
2,970
2,895
3,993
126
81
75
58
36
26
1997/98
3,042
3,472
2,236
2,326
2,969
4,100
6,256
5,023
5,932
3,785
3,957
2,327
3,758
2010/11
Gurgaon
76
80
Chennai
67
60
51
73
Bengaluru
50
Delhi
27
23
37
Agra
Ahmedabad
1996/97
1995/96
* The 2012/13 data has been modified to include the performance of a larger sample set
** Change in 2013/14 expressed as percentage of the figure for 2012/13
a Delhi NCR data (Shaded Portion) from 1995/96 to 2008/09, Delhi (without Gurgaon, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA) data from 2009/10 to 2013/14
Pune
792
1,980
Jaipur
Kolkata
879
1,072
2,491
5,582
3,407
6,720
2,150
2,028
2005/06
879
1,830
4,036
2,708
6,081
1,904
1,720
2004/05
871
1,666
3,121
2,213
3,793
1,523
1,216
2003/04
Hyderabad
1,434
2,470
1,880
2,701
1,164
600
2002/03
3,654
1,766
2,312
1,997
2,402
1,252
620
2001/02
5,547
1,453
2,666
2,452
2,514
1,527
674
2000/01
1,379
1,678
2,177
2,236
1,948
1,374
657
1999/00
Goa
1,363
2,503
2,329
1,920
1,288
884
1998/99
NOIDA
1,371
2,958
2,720
2,112
1,316
934
1997/98
5,443
2,697
2,839
2,107
1,762
944
1996/97
Gurgaon
2,190
2,351
Bengaluru
1,640
Ahmedabad
Delhi
758
1,188
Agra
1995/96
48.0
45
105
88
54
57
88
87
99
109
76
74
49
71
2011/12
2,135
5,050
4,232
2,609
2,714
4,220
4,164
4,736
5,212
3,629
3,562
2,347
3,400
2011/12
2,239
4,754
4,058
2,529
2,353
4,778
3,206
3,754
4,379
2,741
3,186
1,959
3,787
54.5
41
89
80
49
44
82
55
73
84
60
61
39
66
60.7
37
78
67
42
39
79
53
62
72
45
53
32
62
2012/13* 2013/14
2,248
4,856
4,356
2,649
2,394
4,488
2,985
3,958
4,561
3,263
3,314
2,098
3,605
2012/13* 2013/14
9.3%
1.8%
0.7%
4.1%
6.7%
5.7%
7.1%
-12.8%
-8.9%
3.9%
0.9%
3.8%
2.8%
-10.7%
-12.2%
-16.4%
-14.3%
-11.8%
-4.5%
-3.6%
-14.9%
-13.8%
-24.6%
-13.7%
-16.2%
-5.8%
-0.4%
-2.7%
0.5%
3.0%
2.1%
3.4%
-17.9%
-14.2%
0.4%
-2.6%
0.2%
-0.7%
5.6%
12-Month** Compounded
Change
Growth
-0.4%
-2.1%
-6.8%
-4.5%
-1.7%
6.5%
7.4%
-5.2%
-4.0%
-16.0%
-3.8%
-6.6%
5.0%
12-Month** Compounded
Change
Growth
City Trends
A notable observation is the resurgence of Over the last few years, Navi Mumbai has
demand amongst the South Mumbai hotels witnessed a notable increase in commercial
that witnessed an increase in occupancy by activity, with developments such as
approximately 7% over the previous year, Jawaharlal Nehru Port (JNPT), Mindspace,
whereas average rate exhibited a marginal Millennium Business Park and the Reliance
drop of 0.4% at the same time. This demand Technology Park that have heavily
stemmed from the Leisure, Social MICE and contributed to the growth in hotel demand.
Commercial segments. In 2013/14, Central Going forward commercial development in
areas in and around CBD
and North Mumbai hotels
Belapur
and the proposed
displayed an increase in
A notable observation is the
occupancy of 4% over the r e s u r g e n c e o f d e m a n d Seawoods project in addition
previous year; however, amongst the South Mumbai the proposed Exhibition
average rate witnessed a drop hotels that witnessed an C e n t re a re ex p e c t e d t o
increase in occupancy by augment Commercial and
of approximately 7%.
approximately 7% over the MICE demand.
previous year.
Social Media
It's an on-line world and has been for some
time now. While the emergence of social
media may not be a
brand-new trend, Social media tools are
its impact on the providing operators a
hospitality sector greater and faster outthereby enabling
continues to gain reach,
them to connect with their
momentum with audience in real-time.
each passing year.
Social media
platforms such as Facebook, Twitter,
LinkedIn, Instagram, Pinterest, Google+,
Zomato, Tripadvisor, etc. are increasingly
influencing the decisions that today's
consumers are inclined to take. Not
surprisingly therefore, most hotel
companies are spending time, money and
effort in engaging with their target audience
and are keeping them abreast of current
happenings via these media.
Use of social media to promote Room, F&B
and Spa experiences is a rising trend and is
expected to grow in the future. While
benchmarking a hotel or restaurant's
popularity and success may not be entirely
possible simply by correlating it to its
Tripadvisor ratings just yet, one cannot deny
the fact that a vast majority of guests
corporate and leisure alike do conduct
online research before making their hotel
REITs
MICE
We continue to believe that there are
significant opportunities in the MICE
segment across various hotel positioning.
With the announcement of a world-class
convention facility to be developed in Goa in
the recent union budget, we believe this to be
a starting point for other destinations to
follow suit.
JW Marriott Aerocity and Kempinski
Ambience in Delhi, ITC Grand Chola in
Chennai, Sheraton Brigade and Vivanta by
A Potential Threat
While the new government has indeed
chosen to pay attention to tourism and we
find this to be a promising sign for our sector,
it is also a little worrisome when political
adventurism sometimes takes precedence
over common sense. The recent talk
about prohibition in Kerala or a Goa
minister's unnecessary comments about a
proposed ban on swimwear are more
political gimmicks than real issues at hand.
The government of the day would be well
advised to move beyond such posturing and
hopefully concentrate on issues such as
safety of the female traveller so that we may
truly see Indian Hospitality flourish.
In Conclusion
To summarise, the decisive outcome of the
2014 elections is expected to improve
investor confidence in the country. India's
strong economic fundamentals coupled with
a stable political situation will help revive
growth in the mediumto-long term. The
Indian Hospitality sector is very likely on
the cusp of a much awaited growth
trajectory and we end this year's
publication on a note of hope and
optimism.
Contract Negotiation
?
Investment & Transaction Advisory
?
Strategic Advice on Integrated
Developments
?
Operating Budget Reviews
?
Executive Search
?
Marketing Communications
?
Professional Skills Development
?
Sustainability
Mansi Bhatnagar
Monisha Dewan
HVS.com
mbhatnagar@hvs.com
mdewan@hvs.com
Hosted by
SUPPORTED BY
PLATINUM PARTNERS
GOLD PARTNERS
* TBA
BLOCK YOUR
DATES
6TH APRIL, NEW DELHI
Agenda
General
managerS
IN FOCUS
THE
golf challenge
5th April
About HVS
HVS is the world's leading consulting and services organisation focused on the hotel,
restaurant, shared ownership, gaming, and leisure industries. Established in 1980,
the company performs more than 2,500 assignments per year for virtually every
major industry participant. HVS principals are regarded as the leading professionals
in their respective regions of the globe. Through a worldwide network of 34 offices
staffed by 450 seasoned industry professionals, HVS provides an unparalleled range
of complementary services for the hospitality industry. For further information
regarding our expertise and specifics about our services, please visit www.hvs.com.
HVS.com
HVS 6th Floor, Building 8-C, DLF Cyber City, Phase - II, Gurgaon 122 002, INDIA