Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Leer
Leer
0
Copyright Computers and Structures, Inc., 2011
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
enter each name or IP address on a separate line of text. Save this file to the folder where
SAP2000 is installed.
As an alternative to using the LEVEL.TXT file, you can specify the program level as a commandline option. To do this, use the Windows Run command or create a shortcut pointing to
SAP2000.exe in the installation folder. Add the following text to the command line after
SAP2000.exe
/L ProgramLevel
where ProgramLevel is one of the values listed above for the LEVEL.TXT file. Specifying
ProgramLevel on the command line will supersede the value in the LEVEL.TXT file.
If you experience problems with the license please refer to the appropriate License Trouble
Shooting Guide... located in the SAP2000 program folder.
Code-based standard vehicles will be deleted. General vehicles will be retained, but codebased features, length effects, and width effects will be removed.
See the CSi Analysis Reference Manual, chapter Moving Load Analysis, for more information on
the features supported in SAP2000 and CSiBridge.
Description
Licensing has been changed for SAP2000 v15. There are now four levels: Basic, Plus,
Advanced, and Ultimate. Separate module licenses have been removed. The features of the
Basic, Plus, and Advanced levels are the same as for v14. The Ultimate level is the same as
the Advanced level, but also includes the features from the v14 Offshore and StagedConstruction modules. The v14 Bridge module features are no longer available in
SAP2000, but have been moved to product CSiBridge with expanded capabilities.
Description
A new graphical user interface is implemented using tabbed windows that provide more
control over the sizing and placement of the display windows.
Menus and toolbars have been updated for the new user interface. Layout and functionality
have not been significantly changed. Shortcut keys have been expanded and modified for
consistency. The shortcuts can be seen from the menus themselves. User customization of
the toolbars is now saved in the SAP2000v15.INI file rather than a separate .TB3 file as
before.
Description
DirectX graphics, drafting, modeling, and display have been added in addition to the
classical GDI+ graphics, and the previous OpenGL graphics has been removed. DirectX
graphics generally provide better hidden-line display and faster 3-D operations, such as
rotate and zoom, on systems that have video boards with good DirectX capabilities. For
lesser systems, the GDI+ graphics should be used.
Modeling
Enhancements Implemented
Incident
33756
Description
The Bridge Modeler has been removed from SAP2000 v15, and is now available in the
companion product CSiBridge v15 with expanded features. As part of this change to
SAP2000:
Bridge modeling, bridge loading, the bridge scheduler, and bridge design have been
removed.
Design load types used for bridge design have been removed from load patterns and
load cases. The load type "BRIDGE LIVE" has been renamed to "VEHICLE LIVE".
Bridge design load combinations have been removed.
AASHTO steel frame and concrete frame design have been removed.
One-dimensional moving-load analysis has been retained, and is found under the
Define menu. This is similar to the previous capabilities of SAP2000 v14 without the
bridge modeler. General vehicles can be defined; they have no width, length effects, or
code-specific features.
Vehicle response components have been removed.
Lanes are now called paths and are defined by a sequence of frame objects, with
optional eccentricity. Vehicle loading is only applied to the frame objects making up
the path. Influence lines can be plotted.
Moving load analysis by influence line (moving-load case) and step-by-step (vehicle
live load pattern) analysis is available.
If a model from SAP2000 version 14 or earlier is opened in SAP2000 v15, and that
model contains bridge objects or components, those bridge entities will be retained
when possible, but are not accessible in SAP2000 v15. It is strongly recommended
instead that such models be imported into CSiBridge so that the data is accessible.
Loading
Enhancements Implemented
Incident
32351
32354
34724
Description
Automated lateral loading has been added according to the ASCE 7-10/IBC 2009 code.
This includes wind loads, seismic loads, and response-spectrum functions.
Automated lateral loading has been added according to the NBCC 2010 code. This
includes wind loads, seismic loads, and response-spectrum functions.
Automated Response-Spectrum functions have been implemented for the Italian NTC
2008 code, including the database of seismic parameters based on latitude and longitude or
island name.
Analysis
Enhancements Implemented
Incident
34120
Description
CSiLoadOptimizer has been added as a new tool to determine the optimal application of
loads, including the tightening of cables, to achieve specified goals in a structure. Any
number and types of loads can be applied in a linear static, nonlinear static, or stagedconstruction load case. CSiLoadOptimizer will determine the scale factors on these loads
to satisfy the goals. The goals can include response quantities such as displacements or
generalized displacements, superstructure forces and moments, member forces or
moments, and/or joint reactions. If the number of loads that can be varied is greater than
Incident
Description
the number of goals sought, an optimization problem is solved to determine the least cost
of the load application; an optimization problem may also include limits, specified as
response inequalities, that must be satisfied. If the number of loads that can be varied is the
same as the number of goals sought, a determinate problem is solved to determine the
unique solution. If the number of load that can be varied is less than the number of goals
sought, a best-fit (least-squares) problem is solved to determine the solution with the
maximum benefit (smallest error). Iteration is applied as needed to optimize nonlinear
response. The final result is a load case that applies the loads optimally to achieve the
stated goals. This optimized load case becomes part of the model and can be used like any
other load case for further analysis and for design.
Frame Design
Enhancements Implemented
Incident
14513
20666
24495
25340
31733
31932
32869
33016
33886
34262
Description
Steel frame design has been added for Indian code "IS 800:2007". Limit State design has
been implemented, including seismic design (Chapter 12). Class 4 (Slender) section
design and special provisions for Angle sections are not included.
The Singapore National Annex to Eurocode 3 (NA to SS EN 1993-1-2: 2009) has been
implemented for steel frame design using Eurocode 3-2005.
Steel-frame design has been implemented for the Australian design code "AS 41001998". This covers the analysis methods and checking of members subjected to bending,
axial compression, axial tension, and combined actions.
Steel frame design using the "Eurocode 3-2005" code has been enhanced to now consider
the design of Class 4 cross sections.
Steel frame design using the New Zealand code "NZS 3404-1997" has been added.
Concrete frame design using the "Hong Kong CP-04" code has been updated to
incorporate the 2007 supplement.
Steel frame design has been added according to the Canadian code "CSA S16-09".
The Eurocode national annexes for Germany have been added for Eurocode 2-2004
concrete frame design and Eurocode 3-2005 steel frame design.
The Eurocode national annexes for Portugal have been added for Eurocode 2-2004
concrete frame design and Eurocode 3-2005 steel frame design. The national annex for
Eurocode 8-2004 has also been implemented for seismic loading.
Concrete frame design has been added according to the Australian code "AS 3600-09".
Description
Axial stresses in frame objects are now available for graphical display and for output in the
database tables. The axial stresses are the S11 components due to axial force plus bi-axial
bending moment, and are provided for all load cases except influence-based moving-load
cases. Stresses are computed at all critical points in the cross section, plus at the centroid,
and these values can be plotted or tabulated for each station along the frame length. For
Section Designer and general sections, the stresses are computed at the four corners of the
bounding box and at the centroid. Stresses are calculated for the elastic base material, and
do not account for modular ratio or the yielding of hinges. Stresses are computed for the
section property assigned to the frame object, and do not account for the possibility that the
section has been changed during staged construction. The stresses used for design are
Incident
Description
computed separately and are not affected by this enhancement.
Loading
Incidents Resolved
Incident
33123
34732
Description
An issue was resolved where the cable diameter used when calculating open structure auto
wind loads on cable objects may be incorrect leading to incorrect loads being applied to the
cable. The diameter was usually too large, causing the load to be overestimated.
An incident has been resolved where the point of application of the user-defined automated
quake (seismic) loads on the diaphragm could be incorrect. This only affects the statically
applied quake loads of type "User Loads" where the loads were specified to be applied
with respect to the center of mass of the diaphragm. The center-of-mass location was
approximate and was not being correctly calculated from the assembled mass matrix from
analysis. This has been corrected.
Frame Design
Incidents Resolved
Incident
30638
30640
Description
An incident was resolved for steel frame design using the "Eurocode 3-2005" code in
which the capacity value Ncr,T was being calculated in N-mm units regardless of the
database units of the model. The effect could be conservative or unconservative,
depending on the model units.
Several minor corrections and improvements have been made to steel frame design using
the "Eurocode 3-2005" code in order to better match standard published example
problems. The effects of these changes are generally small. However, users should
consider re-verifying designs performed with previous versions of the software.
(1) The shear areas, Av, for the major and minor directions were previously calculated
using standard formulas. Now they are calculated using the detailed formulas of the
design code. The previous values tended to be slightly smaller, and hence overconservative. This change could have a small effect on moment capacity as part of
moment-shear interaction.
(2) The calculation of the tension-capacity value Nu,Rd was missing the factor of 0.9.
The effect was under-conservative when this controlled.
(3) The value of Chi (for flexural buckling) was previously set to 1.0 when the axial force
was less than 4% of the Ncr, as permitted by the code. Now this check has been removed
and the calculated value of Chi is always used, even if the axial force is small. The effect
is very small.
(4) The buckling curve used for welded pipe sections was taken as c or b depending
on whether d/t <= 30 or d/t > 30, respectively. Now for welded pipe sections, the
buckling curve is taken as c regardless of the value of d/t. The effect is small, but was
previously under-conservative.
(5) The value of AlphaLT for rolled-I sections was previously being calculated as 0.34
and 0.49 for the cases where h/b <= 2 and h/b > 2, respectively. Now it is taken as 0.21
and 0.34, respectively, for these two cases. The effect is small, but was previously overconservative.
(6) The upper limit of 1.0 is now imposed on the value of ChiLT. Previously, without this
Incident
32130
34570
34908
Description
limit, the moment capacity for the LTB (lateral torsional buckling) case could be slightly
overestimated. The effect is small, but previously under-conservative.
(7) The value of ChiLT was previously set to 1.0, and the moment capacity for LTB
(lateral torsional buckling) taken as the unreduced value, when the unbraced length was
small (represented by LambdaLT < LambdaLT0), as permitted by the code. Now this
check has been removed and the calculated value of ChiLT is always used, regardless of
whether LambdaLT is less than, equal to, or greater than LambdaLT0. The effect is small.
(8) The LTB (lateral torsional buckling) moment capacity was not previously calculated
for box sections, as this rarely governs. Now this capacity is calculated for all box
sections. The effect is small, but was previously under-conservative.
(9) The calculation of Cm was incorrect for certain units, and in some cases could assume
a negative value. The effect of this was small, but could be over- or underunconservative.
(10) In version 14.2.3, a new check had been introduced to determine if the member was
susceptible to torsional deformation. When NcrT < min(Ncry, Ncrz), the member was
assumed to be susceptible to torsional deformation and Table B.2 was used, otherwise
Table B.1 was used. This check has been changed: now if It < max(Iy, Iz), the member is
assumed to be susceptible to torsional deformation and table B.2 is used. The effect is
small, but may have been under-conservative for v14.2.3 for certain cases.
An incident was resolved where in a particular model file the indexing of steel design
data was corrupted. The design was done correctly and was displayed correctly on screen
and in the tables, but would show an incorrect frame object name in the design details.
This has now been trapped and corrected in the opening of files. A message is given if
such corruption of indexing is found.
An incident is resolved for steel frame design using code "AS 4100-1998" where the
parameter lambda_n as specified in section AS 6.3.3 was incorrectly calculated. The term
fy/250 was taken to the fourth root rather than to the square root. This could
underestimate lambda_n in the common case where fy is greater than 250 MPa, which
would then overestimate the nominal member capacity (Nc) and be under-conservative.
An incident was resolved for steel frame design using the Australian code "AS 41001998" in which the compactness criteria for the web of I sections, box, channel, doublechannel, and T-sections could be incorrectly computed for major and minor direction
bending. The b/t ratio being checked for the web was actually taken as the b/t for the
flange. Here web means the portion of the section that is parallel to the local 2 axis of the
member, regardless of the direction of bending. Results were unaffected for compact
sections. For non-compact and slender sections, the classification, and hence the moment
capacities, could be unconservative in the case where the b/t ratio for the web is larger
than that for the flange.
Description
An incident was resolved where, in some rare cases, the request for Section Cut forces
would result in a runtime error or cause incorrect results to be reported. The problem was
due to an indexing error that could only be triggered if line constraints were present due to
incompatible area or solid meshes, and even then it was uncommon. Only user-defined or
drawn Section Cut results were affected, no other results were affected. Section cuts that
are internally created to calculate bridge forces and stresses for design, display, and output
were not affected. This issue affected versions 12.0.1 to 14.2.4.
External Import/Export
Incidents Resolved
Incident
30642
Description
An incident was resolved for the export to SAFE where the wall loads were not being
exported when the "Loads from above" option was selected. This had no effect on the
results in SAP2000, and was obvious in the model imported to SAFE.