STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA ) IN CIRCUIT COURT
SS SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
COUNTY OF MINNEHAHA )
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA c
2 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT
vs. . OF ARREST WARRANT.
Dallas Rulon Wilkinson
DOB 2-19-1980
LI
Ge Use
Defendant.
Michael Webb, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and states that he is a Detective
of the Sioux Falls Police Department and states that he is one of the officers in charge
of the investigation of the above-styled matter. That your Affiant makes this Affidavit in
support of the State's Attorney's request for a warrant for the arrest of the above-named
Defendant(s), and in compliance with SDCL 23A-2-2, and states as follows:
1, On 6-25-15 at 0819 hours Metro Communications received a call to HyVee,
3000 South Minnesota Avenue for a disorderly subject who was no longer
Present. Officer Starr #704 met with HyVee mananger Adam Joines who
stated this male appeared to be watching women specifically in dresses and
skirts, and placing his foot underneath them from behind. The male is
suspected of using a shoe camera device. Sioux Falls Police Department
case number 15-44323 was filed in this incident.
2. ‘The manager stated he has noticed this male coming in between 7-7:30 in the
mornings. He reviewed surveillance video showing this male watching
women and approaching them while they were standing still in the Starbucks
Kiosk line, The male was observed leaving in a red SUV.
3, On 6-30-15 the manager called again and stated that same male just left the
store and he was able to obtain a license plate. While the male was in the
store, he was again observed watching women and when a female in a dress
walked by, he followed her.
CcAUserstamegowaniDesktop\Arest Affidavit doc4. When a particular female stood in line for Starbucks, he got closely behind
her and extended his left leg placing his foot under her dress for some time.
He was looking around while doing this. It appears that this female is
oblivious as to what the male is doing closely behind her.
5. The license plate registration comes back to the defendant. Photos of the
defendant were obtained and do match the male from the HyVee videos,
6. Your Affiant was able to view 4 different videos from HyVee, 3000 S
Minnesota Avenue. The male clearly is observant of his surroundings and
looks around before approaching the females from behind and extending his
left foot under the dress or skirt. The videos occurred on 6-24-15 and 6-25-15.
7. Your Affiant researched shoe cameras and found models closely matching
the black shoes the defendant is wearing in the videos. There were also
numerous documented cases involving males caught recording and taking
pictures up women’s dresses and skirts.
8. These shoe cameras are capable ot taking photos and also video recording.
They can be easily downloaded to other media devices
9. Your Affiant was granted a search warrant for the defendant, his vehicle, and
his residence at 512 S Discovery Avenue in Sioux Falls on 6-30-2015,
‘Surveillence was done at the HyVee location after that date and the
defendant was not located.
10.On 7-8-15 at 0701 your Affiant received a call from the HyVee manager
stating the vehicle with the male in it was outside in the parking lot. I did
arrived shortly after and observed the defendant in the vehicle. | made
contact with him and explained the investigation, search warrant, and that |
would like to speak with him. The defendant stated he understood and
agreed to speak about this incident.
11. The defendant was bare foot in his vehicle and your Affiant did observe the
black dress type shoes on the seat next to him. The defendant agreed to
show me the shoe camera and components, as well the as the shoes that he
uses during these incidents.
Cuserslaegowan\Desktop\Amest Aida doc12. The defendant stated he knew what he was doing was wrong and has been
doing this behavior for approximately 2 years and an average of twice a
week. He stated he does this in retail-type stores.
13. The defendant states that the camera in his shoe is capable of storing the
videos, and he downloads them to his laptop at home to view them. He
advised he deletes the videos after watching them, but does have two still on
the camera itself and has saved them because they are his favorites.
14. The defendant stated he used the camera at first for legitimate reasons, then
after seeing different types of “sexual stuff’ on the internet, he agreed the
fetish spawned from there.
15. The defendant stated it is a behavior that needs to be corrected and it was a
horrible decision and it needs to stop.
16. The search warrant on the defendant, the vehicle, and his residence were
completed. On the camera device, two videos were located, as the defendant
stated, with footage of under a woman's skirt/dress showing these females
bare legs, buttocks, and crotch areas. There were also numerous stil shots
still on the camera's memory recovered from the deleted files from the
unallocated space of woman's upskirts showing the bare legs, buttocks, and
crotch areas. These images show easily identifiable popular retail locations.
17. The defendant had told your Afffiant that one of the videos on the camera was
from the Farmer's Market. This video also shows a unknown female that the
defendant follows for quite some time and obtains numerous videos up her
skirt also showing her bare legs, buttocks, and crotch areas. Your Affiant did
review this video and the footage does match the Farmer's Market located in
Sioux Falls, Minnehaha County.
18. The female in one of the HyVee videos has been identified 2: >
be advised she does frequent the Starbucks in
HyVee, SUUUS Minnesota Avenue during that time frame. That particular
incident occurred on 6-24-16.
19. Thusfar in the investigation your Affiant has been unable to identify the other
females in the videos or photos.
CcAUserslamepowanDesktoplArest Affidavit doe20.Alll of the above events to the best of your Affiant’s knowledge occurred in
Sioux Falls, Minnehaha County, South Dakota.
CON
(Signature)
Subscribed anfeworn befor
this 1pth day of July, 2015.
C1Userstamegowan\Desktoplrest Affidavit soe