Mathie Eden (SM)
Cuttural Studies
and
Critical Theory
Patrick Fuery
and Wick Mansfield
OXFORDQxFORD
rm ot Si ee WA
Seinen dre een,
DSR Ren
‘SG lS an Root Bang ne cea aa at
re
Eimer Stat Wane ec Mab cP
[Reisen Stang Spr Tape To fst War
‘osu capuin ose Baan
egebarte) Boot 7
"Shaan
Bigemy
ta ain Ma i
‘Bel Men ee eo
Sout
Every oe On
‘REST ccs Rls Bl ea Ss
Contents
Acknowledgments
Preface
Introduction
Part One The Humanities After Humanism
Introduction
1 Posthumarism
2. The ert, Culture, and the Unconscious:
Life Without the Canon
Part Two From Interpretation to Interaction
Introduction
{3 The Ready Guastion: Phenomenalogy, Semiotics,
and the Act of Reading
4 Deconstruction, The Death ofthe Author anc
Ineortextusly
5 Seduced bythe Text: Theories ofthe Gaze
6 Veual Cutures
PartThree Contextuslity
Introduction
7. Contextual: Postmedemism
{8 Contextual: Feminism and the Fit of Noir
8. Contexualty: The Cutual Politics of Postmoderism
Part Four Texts and Subjects
Introduction
40. The Edge of the Miror:The Subjct and the Other
11 Mating and Unmaking the Subject
12 Deconstructing Sexuality
Concusion
Glossary
Bibliography
Index
aesAcknowledgments
‘We would ike wo thank a number of people who have helped ws wich
this projet. Jill Henry at Oxford Universiy Press for her advice,
patience, and encouragement, and Jo MeMilan for efficent (and
considerate) editing. The Royal Netherlands Academy ofthe Arts
and Seienees for a fellowship and 2 grant for sesearch. Bock
“Macquarie University and the University of London offered financial
and practical suppor. Our collegues in Critical and Cularal
Studies at Macquarie for thee help and their belie another way of
doing things. Patrick Faery would ike to thankhsfamily—Kelli and
“Morgan—who have gives so much support andersanding, and love
during this project. He also thanks them for taking him to
Disneyland Paris, mostly for cesearch purposes. Nick would lke
to thank Yroone Eden, whose seseasth and judgment made his
‘work possible
Preface
‘When we set out in 1994 teach a first-year undergraduate course
fon theoretical concepts in trary and cuturl studies, we assumed
i would be easy to find 2 textbook. We found, howeves, that many
‘ofthe candidates, suchas Catherine Belsey’s Critical Practice (1980)
‘or Terry Eapletons Literary Theory: An Introduction (1983), both of
‘which belong tothe heady days of the eacly 1980s, were dated.
‘Other, such at Raman Seldens A Reader's Guide to Contemporary
“Literary Theory (1985), had refined teary theory int a canon—
providing potted summaries ofthe work of 'ajor figures or move
‘ments. Anthologies of readings, in cur, were always dssatstyng,
made up of predictable o unusable choices, and never quite organ.
ised into a useful staceure, Nor did we want a book tht deal only
with che issues of representation and deconstruction that dominated
1970s and 1980s literary theory, We certainly wanted to deal with
‘these issues but asa starting pone to an investigation of the highly
charged controversies about power, gender, subjectivity, culture, and
semuality that have defined the humanities inthe 1990s, and ave is
major point of contact withthe non-academic wold
‘This book is organised, therlore, around a set of controversies
‘We fle thar it was not part of our students’ education tobe made ro
appreciate the achievements ofthe theoretical igureheads that had
influenced and impressed us. Ceainly, che construction of a post
‘modern canon may sometimes sem pedagogically necessary, but itis
smote o¢ less a bewayal of what many theorists st ou to achieve
Or aim is noe to induct students inv a panicular mode of thinking,
but to enliven ast of iss for them, so that they may enter vigor”
‘ously into the debate from whichever position suis them. Of course,
‘we have conscious and unconscious biases of our wn that mast be
exhibited everywhere in this book. There is also disagreement
between the woof us on many ofthe isuesdseused here. But itis
‘our bei tha in the new humanities, disagreement isthe ame of
the game, We are aware that we are probably always conforming topresent of future orthodosof one sor or another, but our hope is
thac readers will not fel that they are being asked ro agre with cet-
tain points of view in onder to ener the community of the theoet-
cally lierate,
Similarly, we have chosen not ro pretend that ee issues dea with
sete canbe redaced to simple, unambiguous statements. The area of
cultural theory dele with ditficul material, and that will sometimes
Show up ina certain density to our argument. Thisis partly Because
the sues dealt with ae fundamental tothe way we encounter cul-
ture, plies, and indeed ourclves. Many theories that have had
Inajor impact on literary and cukaralstaies have dele with what
tale generations of intellectuals least in, say, English stud-
iee—took for granted: subjecivity, sexuality, endes, and so on,
“There is no easy way into alr of these ideas. On the other hand
sve have found, often despite warnings from colleagues that we were
being naive, that even first year students have an enthusiasm for a
Jor of diffiele and abstract material when the fel it wo be chal
Tenging and extending In fact, we must mack our gratitade co st
dents in the Concept and Controversy stand of ENGL45 and the
subsequent CUL 100: Test, Image, Culture both at Macquarie
Universi) over the last several years, who, through their enthusi-
asm for much of che material covered here, made us reals that this
project was a worthwhile one. Having mentioned our stadent iis
probably worth noting that we hope tis book will also be of valve
to people working in journalism, che arts and entertainment inds
tres, and those who ace interested in general inthe isues thrown
‘up by contemporary cultuze. We hope twill be of incerest and sx-
vice to ar many people as possible
‘Much ha been sail about the radical eensfrmason ofthe human-
ities inthe lst tity yeas. This has been partly due tothe radical
expansion ofthe tertiey education sector ia that time, and partly a
result of eeonsiderstions of the socal function of intellectual work
Since the 1960s. Iie also duet an expansion inthe theorisation of
‘many fundamental iesues that touch on all fields in the humanities,
‘whatever their traditional provenance. This book s organised around
four key subject areas that we fe summarise the main achievements
ofthis theorisaton, Fs, the ue of culture: what isthe relationship
between the ‘new’ humanises and che humanism from which they
derived? How do the new humanities make ue reconsider wha ‘cule
ture is expecially the relationship betwen high low, and sub cu-
ture? Second, the issue of textual: wha i a text? How do texts
relate to one another, to thei auchors and audiences? How do they
felate to our bodies, and ourselves? Third, what isthe relaonship
between tex and thee contexts: how do postmodern undewstandings
of what texts do compare with those of the modern era, and adie?
How does gendes, particularly as theorised by posttruturalism, con
dition our tatonship with texts? Finally, what i subjectivity, and
‘wn has i become oinportne? In tis ast section we deal with sy