Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Geothermal Reservoir Management
Geothermal Reservoir Management
Geoproduction Consultants (GPC), Paris Nord 2, 14 rue de la Perdrix, Lot 109, BP 50030, 95946 ROISSY CDG CEDEX, France
pierre.ungemach@geoproduction.fr, m.antics@geoproduction.fr
(2)
ABSTRACT
The non-renewability, at human time scale, of geothermal
energy sources arises the problematic of reservoir longevity
and sustainable mining of heat in place.
1. INTRODUCTION
Once a geothermal resource has been identified and the
reservoir assessed, leading to a conceptual model of the
geothermal system, reservoir development and relevant
management issues come into play.
EXTERNALITIES
RESERVOIR
ENGINEERING
RESERVOIR/
SYSTEM LIFE
SUSTAINABILITY
ECONOMICS
OFFER
Recoverable
Heat
DEVELOPMENT/
MANAGEMENT
STRATEGY
Existing/potential
heat loads
PRODUCTION
TECHNOLOGY
RISK
ASSESSMENT
Non Technical
Obstacles
DEMAND
ECONOMIC/
FINANCIAL/
INSTITUTIONAL/
ENVIRONMENTAL
Figure 3: Cross sectional view of the main deep aquifer horizons (Rojas, 1989). (5) - Dogger Aquifer (Mid Jurassic)
Figure 4: Location of the geothermal district heating sites in the Paris Basin (Ungemach, 2001)
A thorough synthesis of the Dogger geothermal reservoir
can be found in the comprehensive review edited by Rojas
(1989).
Achieved
Forecasts
trends
2005
(1985) 1990 2000
55
43
34
34
Target
Operating doublets
Total installed capacity
360
260
227
(MWt)
Produced heat
2,000 1,455 1,240
(GWht/yr)
Unit installed capacity
6.5
6.0
6.7
(MWt)
Unit heat production
36,000 33,800 36,200
(MWht/yr)
Artificial lift wells
49
36
27
Self-flowing wells
6
7
7
200
1,000
5.9
30,000
22
12
Chemical reaction:
Na+
Cl-
Steel casing
Ca++
Mg++
Fe++
Fe
2e-
Fe Fe + 2e
H+
FeS
Fe++
ANODE
HSFeS
HCO3H+
CATHODE
HS-
UPWARD FLOW
DIRECTION
for pH = 6
Figure 5: Iron dissolution and sulphide precipitation process in presence of aqueous H2S and CO2 (Ungemach, 1997)
Reservoir characteristics
intrinsic transmissivity (kh) = 30 Dm
net reservoir thickness (h) = 20 m
intrinsic permeability (k) = 1.5 D
effective porosity () = 0.16
initial reservoir temperature (T0) = 72C
78C
76C
74C
GBMN4 (I)
72C
LE BLANC MESNIL
AULNAY-SOUS-BOIS-RDV
70C
AULNAY-SOUS-BOIS-VGS
68C
GBMN3 (P)
66C
VILLENEUVE LA GARENNE
64C
GLCN3 (P)
62C
GLCS4 (I)
60C
LA COURNEUVE NORD
GLCN4 (I)
LA COURNEUVE GLCS3
SUD (P)
58C
SEVRAN
56C
BONDY
CLICHY-SOUS-BOIS
LA VILLETTE
Figure 8: Multidoublet simulated area. GLCS1: existing well, GLCN3: future well, P: Production well, I-: Injection
well,
: simulated area, 1500m : top reservoir depth, 180 bar : pressure at top reservoir depth, 20Dm : isotransmissivity contour line
7
Q
(m3/h)
-132
GLCS2
132
GLCS3
GLCS4
GLCS1
1990-1997
1998-1999
2000-2001
2002-2003
2004-2010
Ti
(C)
Q
(m3/h)
-132
Ti
(C)
Q
(m3/h)
-132
Ti
(C)
Q
(m3/h)
-90
Ti
(C)
Q
(m3/h)
-90
Ti
(C)
Q
(m3/h)
-80
Ti
(C)
42
132
42
132
42
90
42
90
42
80
40
2011-2035
Q
(m3/h)
57.5
Ti
(C)
38
57.5
38
-115
2036-2060
Q
(m3/h)
-118
118
GLCN1
156
GLCN2
-156
GLCN3
GLCN4
GBMN1
-163
GBMN2
163
GBMN3
GBMN4
43
156
43
-156
156
43
-156
156
43
-156
156
43
-156
160
42
-160
77
38
77
38
-176
-152
152
-145
50
145
-145
52
145
-130
52
130
-80
53
80
45
65
48
65
48
-130
32
-110
110
DOUBLET
32
-154
154
48
Ti
(C)
40
GLCS
18000
18000
18000
14250
14250
12500
20200
27600
GLCN
22800
22800
22800
22800
22800
25000
34300
39000
GBMN
31800
26700
22600
22600
19000
18000
25400
30000
TOTAL
72600
67500
63400
59650
56050
55500
79900
96600
10000
9000
8000
GBMN1
10
7000
GGMN2
(C)
9
8
6000
GLCN2
(B)
GLCS2
5000
5
(D)
(A)
GLCN1
GLCS1
4000
3
2
3000
1
0
2000
1000
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000 11000
Figure 9: Simulated head/temperature/diluted injected water concentration contour map. SHEMAT processing. Time 27
years. GLCN : well name, (A)-(D): model control points, 1845m iso-head contour line, 58C : isotemperature contour line, green colour gradation: injected water concentration.
10000
9000
GBMN1
8000
10
7000
GBMN2
9
(C)
GBMN3
GCLN2
6000
GCLN3
GCLS2
5000
(B)
(A)
(D)
GCLS1
GCLN1
4000
3
2
GCLS3
3000
1
0
2000
1000
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000 11000
Figure 10: Simulated head/temperature/diluted injected water concentration contour map. SHEMAT processing. Time 52
years. GLCN : well name, (A)-(D): model control points, 1845m iso-head contour line, 58C : isotemperature contour line, green colour gradation: injected water concentration.
10000
9000
8000
GBMN4
GBMN1
7000
10
9
(C)
GBMN3
GBMN2
6000
GCLN2
GCLS2
5000
GCLN3
GCLS4
(D)
(A)
GCLS1
(B)
GCLN1
5
4
GCLN4
4000
3
2
GCLS3
3000
1
0
2000
1000
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000 11000
Figure 11: Simulated head/temperature/diluted injected water concentration contour map. SHEMAT processing. Time 77
years. GLCN : well name, (A)-(D): model control points, 1845m iso-head contour line, 58C : isotemperature contour line, green-colour gradation: injected water concentration.
4. DISCUSSION
Given the uncertainties inherent to any modelling exercise,
the reliability of the previously simulated scenarios will be
discussed with respect to sensitive issues such as (i) well
(physical) and reservoir (thermal) life, (ii) reservoir
assessment and simulation issues, (iii) heat demand
forecasts, (iv) economic implications, and (v) non technical
impacts known as externalities.
tB =
(1)
(2)
(4)
R=
t d2 h
3 f Q
(3)
2011-2035
Existing doublet reconditioning/lining..........................................................................................
Drilling/completion of a new, corrosion resistant, production well ..............................................
Miscellaneous equipments/fittings................................................................................................
TOTAL
2036-2060
Abandonment (cementing) of the initial well doublet ..................................................................
Replacement of the production well fiberglass liner.....................................................................
Drilling/completion of a new, corrosion resistant, injection well .................................................
Miscellaneous equipments/fittings................................................................................................
TOTAL
COMAPARATIVE FIGURES
Capital investments (103 )
Natural gas cogeneration plant (rated 5 MWe) / Conventional, steel cased (95/8), well doublet ...........
Cost prices ()
11
450
3,000
150
3,600
350
450
2,750
200
3,750
4,600 / 3,600
5-8 / 3-4
50/t
200,000
7/MWht
5. CONCLUSIONS
Owing to the exhaustible nature of geothermal resources,
sustainable heat mining is of utmost importance in
designing and implementing relevant exploitation strategies
aimed at reconciling users demands with reservoir
longevity concerns.
REFERENCES
Clauser, C. Ed.: Numerical Simulation of Reactive Flow in
Hot Aquifers. SHEMAT and Processing SHEMAT.
Springer Publ. Co. Berlin. (2003).
Clearly,
corrosion/scaling,
initially
overlooked,
shortcomings and water injection proved the most sensitive
problem areas, an attribute, as a matter of fact, shared by
most geothermal reservoirs worldwide, would they be
hosted either by low or high enthalpy, fractured or not,
consolidated carbonate and loose clastic sedimentary or
volcanic rock environments.
12