Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Composites: Part B
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compositesb
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 27 December 2011
Received in revised form 7 May 2012
Accepted 3 July 2012
Available online 24 July 2012
Keywords:
A. Polymermatrix composites (PMCs)
B. Mechanical properties
Natural bers
a b s t r a c t
This study provides a bibliographic review in the broad eld of green composites seeking-out for materials with a potential to be applied in the near future on automotive body panels. Hereupon, materials
deriving from renewable resources will be preferred as opposed to the exhaustible fossil products. With
the technical information of bio-polymers and natural reinforcements a database was created with the
mechanical performance of several possible components for the prospect green composite. Following
the review, an assessment is performed where aspects of suitability for the candidate elements in terms
of mechanical properties are analyzed. In that section, renewable materials for matrix and reinforcement
are screened accordingly in order to identify which hold both adequate strength and stiffness performance along with affordable cost so as to be a promising proposal for a green composite.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Green composites deriving from renewable resources bring very
promising potential to provide benets to companies, natural environment and end-customers due to dwindling petroleum resources. The shift to more sustainable constructions in
automotive industry is not only an initiative towards a more viable
environment and cost efciency but also a demand of European
regulations. The latter are playing an important role as a driving
force toward sustainable materials use. According to the European
Guideline 2000/53/EG issued by the European Commission, 85% of
the weight of a vehicle had to be recyclable by 2005. This recyclable percentage will be increased to 95% by 2015 [1]. Another way
to balance sustainability and cost is with the use of composites
in automobile panels, as introduced by a number of automakers
which use renewable materials in composites. Composites made
of renewable materials have been rampantly used in interior and
exterior body parts. Similar components are used as trim parts in
dashboards, door panels, parcel shelves, seat cushions, backrests
and cabin linings. In recent years there has been increasing interest
in the replacement of berglass in reinforced plastic composites by
natural plant bers such as jute, ax, hemp, sisal and ramie [24].
A natural based material can be dened as a product made from
renewable agricultural and forestry feedstock, including crops and
crop by-products and its residues. Although end-of-life directives
and regulations will ask for components of higher recyclability,
the use of renewable materials has not been dictated. Further
Corresponding author. Address: Instituto Superior Tecnico, Mechanical Building
2, Room 1.45, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal. Tel.: +351 926177071;
fax: +351 218474045.
E-mail address: gkoronis@gmail.com (G. Koronis).
1359-8368/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.004
RAUM 2003 model in the spare tire cover. The part made of a PLA
matrix from sugar cane and sweet potato and it was reinforced
with kenaf bers [8]. Later examples are the interior components
which combine bamboo bers and a plant-based resin polybutylene succinate (PBS), and oor mats made from PLA and nylon bers
for Mitsubishi motors [9]. Toyota added the Matrix and RAV4
models to the list of vehicles using soy-based seat foams in the
summer of 2008 [10]. Recently, Ford selected wheat straw as reinforcement for a storage bin and inner lid in its 2010 Flex crossover
vehicle while BMW, for the 7 Series sedan used prepreg natural ber mats and a unique thermosetting acrylic copolymer for the
lower door panel [11]. Lately, Toyota developed an eco-plastic
made from sugar cane and will use it to line the interiors of the
cars. In fact, its rst use will be on the new CT 200 for its luggage
compartment as announced at Automotive World Congress in January 2011 [12].
121
122
method which differed from the one of jute. Similar results were
shown in another study of the same author [25] where jute and
abaca were tested in PP matrices. In that study, the coupling agent
determined the overall performance.
2.1.1. Mechanical performance of natural bers
In order to have a broader view of the mechanical and physical
properties of different natural bers, available data from several
authors was compiled in Table 1. Indicative prices (USD/kg) which
are included in that table are adopted from several nonconcurring
sources and thus may not represent the present state.
With the values from Table 1, two graphs are created below in
Fig. 2 depicting the mechanical performance of the bers reviewed.
Average specic stiffness and specic strength were calculated as
they are important indicators of structural performance for automobile panels. The former two values happen to be the most critical engineering characteristics of automobile design over the past
years [26]. Specically, materials with high specic stiffness and
specic strength are likely to have special merit in applications
in which weight will be a critical factor. Because the values of
Youngs modulus and tensile strength used for the charts calculations were found to be different in every study, the extreme values
(of specic stiffness and strength) were marked in ranges. In parallel to that occurrence, the variation of values in the physical properties of the bers is attributable to different harvesting seasons
and/or regions of the planet.
It can be observed from Fig. 2, that there is no optimum ber
that outperforms in values all the rest in both charts. E-glass is
clearly better in terms of specic strength, but is outperformed
by kenaf, hemp and ramie in specic stiffness. In an attempt to
have an average performance similar to E-glass, a reasonable
choice could be to select hemp which is stronger than ramie and
still stiffer than E-glass. Denitely more factors are needed to
choose the optimum material besides its mechanical performance.
One factor that was not taken into account is the raw materials
Table 1
Properties of several natural bers and E-glass. The values are adopted from the studies and database of [7,19,4753]. References inside the table are for price only.
Fibers
Density (g/cm3)
Diameter (mm)
Price (USD/kilo)
Flax
Hemp
Jute
Kenaf
Ramie
Sisal
Curaua
Abaca
E-glass
1.5
1.47
1.31.49
1.51.6
1.51.6
1.45
1.4
1.5
2.55
40600
25250
25250
2.64
0.049
50200
710
1030
1525
3451500
550900
393800
350930
400938
468700
5001100
430813
20003500
2739
3870
1326.5
4053
61.4128
9.422
11.830
31.133.6
7073
2.73.2
1.64
1.161.5
1.6
1.23.8
37
3.74.3
2.9
2.53.7
3.11
1.55
0.925
0.378
2
0.65
0.45
0.345
2
[54]
[54]
[54]
[54]
[54]
[54]
[55]
[56]
[54]
123
moisture sensitivity leads to severe reduction of mechanical properties and delaminating. Furthermore, low microbial resistance
and susceptibility to rotting can act as restriction factors particularly during shipment and long-term storage, as well as during
composite processing [29]. Similar to the case of wood composites,
natural bers and plastic are like oil and water, and do not mix
well. As most polymers, especially thermoplastics, are non-polar
(hydrophobic, repelling water) substances and not compatible
with polar (hydrophilic, absorbing water) wood bers and, therefore, poor adhesion between polymer and ber may result [30]. In
order to improve the afnity and adhesion between reinforcements and thermoplastic matrices in production, chemical
coupling or compatibilising agents have to be employed
[20,29,31]. Chemical coupling agents are substances, typically
polymers that are used in small quantities to treat a surface in such
a way that increased bonding occurs between the treated surface
and other surfaces.
Another primary drawback of the use of bers is the low processing temperature required (limited thermal stability). The permitted temperature is up to 200 C, above this limit the bers
start to degrade and shrink which subsequently results in lower
performance of the composite. In general, when bers are subjected to heat, the physical and/or chemical structural changes that
occur are depolymerization, hydrolysis, oxidation, dehydration,
decarboxylation, and recrystallization [32], and thus conne the
variety of resins they can be blended with [33]. In order to avoid
this processing defect, the range of temperatures has to be limited
as well as the processing time [34].
All the aforementioned aspects render the natural bers incorporation in exterior surfaces of vehicles complicated, especially
when legislations in force and requirements of safety demand certain levels of performance to be fullled. For that reason, car makers are skeptical for their use in the exterior body panels even if
they are widely used for interiors or hidden parts of the vehicles
chassis. On the other hand, when composites containing natural bers are used, there are added benets achieved as enhanced environmental performance due to the lower density of natural ber in
comparison to glass. Those results were presented in the study of
Alves et al. [3] where simulation tests were done on a jute ber/
Table 2
Properties of natural polymers in relation with polypropylene. The values are adopted from other studies [7,5764]. References inside the table are for price only.
Polymer
Density (g/cm3)
Price (USD/kilo)
Thermoplastic starch
PLA
PLLA
PHB
PHBV
PP
11.39
1.211.25
1.251.29
1.181.26
1.231.25
0.91.16
110115
150162
170190
168182
144172
161170
56
2160
15.565.5
2440
2025
3040
0.1250.85
0.353.5
0.832.7
3.54
0.51.5
1.11.6
3144
2.56
34
58
17.525
20400
5.5
2.42
4.5
4
3.5
1.65
[54]
[54]
[59]
[65]
[66]
[54]
124
125
Processing
Reference
2 0.2
4.8 0.2
1.8 0
n.s
0.8 0
2.3 0.2
7 1.5
1 0.2
2.7 1.5
1.4 0.1
3.01 0.22
26.3 0.55
66.8 1.7
81.9 2.9
62 2
35.2 1.3
98 12
40 2.5
53 3.1
29.1 4.2
47.9 2.7
82.8 4.0
2.5 0.23
n.s
9.6 0.36
7.2 0.3
7 0.26
9.5 0.5
4.7 0.3
8.3 0.6
5 0.4
5.8 0.47
4.62 0.11
[67]
[20]
[50]
[16]
[24]
[68]
[68]
[43]
[43]
[50]
[54]
n.s: Non-studied.
a
Long bers composite.
In order to avoid that practice; the authors will enrich the depth
of the one-dimensional factors by considering three bi-dimensional factors: specic strength, specic stiffness and cost per
weight. These factors are considered to be orthogonal as they are
uncorrelated and thus fulll their purpose and pertinence of use.
Moreover, regarding the materials that are screened, the synthetic
ones which were presented in Table 1 and Table 2 (PP for resin and
E-glass for reinforcement) are not renewable and therefore they
are out of the scope of this selection method. Their presence in
the above tables of the previous chapters was only for the purpose
Fig. 5. Ternary diagrams of the resin for matrix, on the left, and bers for reinforcement, on the right.
126
127
[37] Wool R, Khot SN, University of Delaware. ASM International; Bio-based resins
and natural bers; 2000. <http://www.chemistry.mtu.edu/pages/courses/les/
ch4620-paheiden/WebProject-2006/Bio%20Project/Bio-1.pdf>.
[38] Uyama H, Kuwabara M, Tsujimoto T, Kobayashi S. Enzymatic synthesis and
curing of biodegradable epoxide-containing polyesters from renewable
resources. Biomacromolecules 2003;4:2115.
[39] Shogren RL, Petrovic Z, Liu ZS, Erhan SZ. Biodegradation behavior of some
vegetable oil-based polymers. J Polym Environ 2004;12:1738.
[40] Suprakas SR, Mosto B. Biodegradable polymers and their layered silicate
nanocomposites: in greening the 21st century materials world. Prog Mater Sci
2005;50:9621079.
[41] van Dam JEG, de Klerk-Engels B, Struik PC, Rabbinge R. Securing renewable
resource supplies for changing market demands in a bio-based economy. Ind
Crops Prod 2005;21:12944.
[42] John R, Nampoothiri K, Pandey A. Fermentative production of lactic acid from
biomass: an overview on process developments and future perspectives. Appl
Microbiol Biotechnol 2007;74:52434.
[43] Oksman K, Skrifvarsb M, Selinc JF. Natural bres as reinforcement in polylactic
acid (PLA) composites. Compos Sci Technol 2003;63:131724.
[44] Jahan A, Ismail MY, Sapuan SM, Mustapha F. Material screening and choosing
methods a review. Mater Des 2010;31:696705.
[45] Ribeiro I, Pecas P, Silva A, Henriques E. Life cycle engineering methodology applied
to material selection, a fender case study. J Cleaner Prod 2008;16:188799.
[46] Saur K, Fava JA, Spatari S. Life cycle engineering case study: automobile fender
designs. Environ Prog 2000;19:7282.
[47] Wambua P. Natural bres: can they replace glass in bre reinforced plastics?
Compos Sci Technol 2003;63:125964.
[48] Sedan D, Pagnoux C, Smith A, Chotard T. Mechanical properties of hemp bre
reinforced cement: Inuence of the bre/matrix interaction. J Eur Ceram Soc
2008;28:18392.
[49] George J, Sreekala MS, Thomas S. A review on interfacial modication and
characterization of natural ber reinforced plastic composites. Polym Eng Sci
2001;41:147185.
[50] Bledzki AK, Jaszkiewicz A, Scherzer D. Mechanical properties of PLA
composites with man-made cellulose and abaca bres. Compos, Part A: Appl
Sci Manuf 2009;40:40412.
[51] Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Jaszkiewicz A, Erdmann K. Polypropylene composites
with enzyme modied abaca bre. Compos Sci Technol 2010;70:85460.
[52] Goda K, Sreekala MS, Gomes A, Kaji T, Ohgi J. Improvement of plant based
natural bers for toughening green composites effect of load application
during mercerization of ramie bers. Compos, Part A: Appl Sci Manuf
2006;37:221320.
[53] kenaf-ber.com. Technical data and information about thermal insulation and
soundproong of kenaf natural bers. Mantova: KEFI, S.p.A. [03.07.10]. <http://
www.kenaf-ber.com/en/infotec-tabella2.asp>.
[54] Design G. CES EduPack Ver.6.2.0 materials selection software. Cambridge: Granta
Design Limited; 2010.
[55] Satyanarayana KG, Guimares JL, Wypych F. Studies on lignocellulosic bers of
Brazil. Part I: source, production, morphology, properties and applications.
Compos, Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 2007;38:1694709.
[56] Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Agricultural price
statistics; 2010 [upated 10.09.10; accesed 15.11.10]. <http://faostat.fao.org/
site/570/default.aspx#ancor>.
[57] Van de Velde K, Kiekens P. Biopolymers: overview of several properties and
consequences on their applications. Polym Test 2002;21:43342.
[58] Averous L, Moro L, Dole P, Fringant C. Properties of thermoplastic blends:
starch-polycaprolactone. Polymer 2000;41:415767.
[59] Clarinval AM. Classication and comparison of thermal and mechanical properties
of commercialized polymers. In: IENICA, editor. International congress & trade
show, industrial applications of bioplastics. York, UK; 2002, February 35.
[60] Tsuji H. In vitro hydrolysis of blends from enantiomeric poly(lactide)s Part 1. Wellstereo-complexed blend and non-blended lms. Polymer 2000;41:362130.
[61] Phong L, Han ESC, Xiong S, Pan J, Loo SCJ. Properties and hydrolysis of PLGA and PLLA
cross-linked with electron beam radiation. Polym Degrad Stab 2010;95:7717.
[62] Ahankari SS, Mohanty AK, Misra M. Mechanical behaviour of agro-residue
reinforced poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), (PHBV) green
composites: A comparison with traditional polypropylene composites.
Compos Sci Technol 2011;71:6537.
[63] Li Y, Shimizu H. Improvement in toughness of poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) through
reactive blending with acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer (ABS):
morphology and properties. Eur Polym J 2009;45:73846.
[64] Curvelo AAS, de Carvalho AJF, Agnelli JAM. Thermoplastic starch-cellulosic
bers composites: preliminary results. Carbohydr Polym 2001;45:1838.
[65] Shiroma E, Drumond S, Blazek G, Souza MR, Lachtermacher M, Wang SH. PHB
toughening by blending with polyethyl glycol. In: World polymer congress and
41st international symposium on macromolecules. Brasil: Rio de Janeiro;
2006. p. 12 [July 1621].
[66] Dent A, H. Breakdown: Biodegradable Plastics. MATTER Magazine; 2008;5(2)
[cited 05.09.11]. <http://www.materialconnexion.com/Home/Matter/MATTER
Magazine/PastIssues/MATTER52/BiodegradablePlastics/tabid/196/Default.aspx>.
[67] Vilaseca F, Mendez J, Pelach A, Llop M, Canigueral N, Girones J, et al. Composite
materials derived from biodegradable starch polymer and jute strands. Process
Biochem 2007;42:32934.
[68] Bodros E, Pillin I, Montrelay N, Baley C. Could biopolymers reinforced by
randomly scattered ax bre be used in structural applications? Compos Sci
Technol 2007;67:46270.