Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Okayama University
Vol.1. No.1. pp.193-198. March 1996
Abstract
dimensional consolidation
1. INTRODUCTION
We sometimes fail to obtain the acceptable
estimate of consolidation settlements of soft
grounds even though adopting an elaborate
constitutive equation in finite element method.
The failure is probably due to uncertainty of
soil constants and boundary conditions, etc.
Accordingly, several methods to predict settlements using observed data have been proposed
and widely used. (Yoshikuni et al. 1981)
This paper presents a new method of settlement prediction using observed settlement
velocity. The method is based on the theoretical
result which shows that the settlement velocity
of soft grounds non-improved or improved
with sand drains decreases exponentially with
(1)
193
194
-8 C h
a=-- -2
F(n)
n
F(n)=
where
Ch
'
n -1
In(n) -
3n -1
4n2 '
AS / At =
S -S
b
(6)
tb - ta
dS
dt = - aSf exp[ at] .
ment velocity (I1S1I1t), we can find the regression parameters a 0, a 1. Then we can calculate
y =A o exp[ Al x]
(3)
as
A o =- aSf , Al = a
(4)
(7)
model.
(5)
where ao
(tiS II1t)
Time, I
S'(t')=Si{ 1 - exp[at']}
(8)
--
cCI):
E
CI)
(J)
A'
S'f = - Y0 '
1
(9)
S=So+S.r{ 1 - exp[at'
n.
(10)
3.
DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN
ANALYTICAL AND APPROXIMATE
SOLUTIONS OF BARRON'S CONSOLIDATION EQUATION
The relationships between the time factor
(Th) and the settlement velocity ( dUldTh) for
the different values of the diameter ratio (n ) are
shown in Fig. 2. The solid lines represent
analytical solutions and the open circles the
-
Analytical
0 Approximate
195
approximate solutions of Barron's consolidation equation. We notice that there are slight
differences between the approximate solutions
and the analytical solutions in the region of
small Th.
Fig. 3 shows the relationship between the
real time (t) and the real settlement velocity
( dSI dt) calculated with the soil constants of
KASAOKA-Bay clay (Fujii et al. 1991). The
differences appear only in the initial stage of
consolidation. Those differences are therefore
practically negligible.
10 . . . . - - - - - - . . . - - - - - - - - ,
.r:.
I-
::!:2
:> 8
'0
>.
130 6
~
l ::
CI)
CI)
ECI) 2
...
C/)
(n)
0.1
Time factor, Th
where
Ct,
cz ...
+ ",=Sf (11)
>:
2 w------.---...,......--.------r-----,
as
(12)
Analytical
::!:2
C/)
'0
~1
c1
1i 0.5
E
CI)
~ 0 L_--l._~~~;;;;;;;;t;g;=d..o()o-J
100
200
300
400
500
Time, t (days)
Fig. 3 Analytical and approximate relationships
between time (t) and settlement velocity (dS/dt)
(13)
196
5. PREDICTED SETTLEMENTS OF
SOFf GROUNDS IMPROVED WITH
PACKED SAND DRAINS
The proposed method is applied to the
settlement prediction of the soft grounds in
o Observed
-==
o Observed
Regression line
~1.5
Regression line
....
~
en
"'C
~ 1
en
"'C
~
o
~ 0.5 I--~~--+--_+---+--_____j
'0
Q)
E
Q)
en
~
(,)
o
~ 0.5
'E
Q)
E
l ::
....
L...-_--'-_ _...L--_----L.....u.~~
_
100
200
300
Time,
r (days)
400
__'
500
~ 0 L_..L_--.l_-=~~~~~
en
200
300
400
200
300
r (days)
400
500
Time (days)
100
100
Time,
Q)
500
600
100
200
300
400
500
600
O~-....----.----r-----r----r----,
O~.---.,....--...,.---,--....,...----r-----,
t'=O
_
50
I--~~-+---+---+--_+-_____j
_ 50
E
'E
l ::
~ 100
Q)
E
Q)
Q)
~
en 150
EQ)
en 150
o Observed
-
Predicted
100
all data
200
o Observed
Predicted
all data
200
4H
6C
197
(14)
--[]- 7H
Rs
R s =O.7
R s =O.8
R s =O.9
R s =O.95
Hyperbolic
Monden
Hoshino
Asaoka
U'=O.4
U'=O.6
U'=O.4
U'=O.5
U'=O.6
U'=O.7
U'=O.5
U'=O.65
U'=O.7
U'=O.8
U'=O.6
U'=O.8
U'=O.8
U'=O.9
U'=O.7
U'=O.9
'E
Proposed
5E
--+-
Methods
7G
cr.'" 0.9
~ 0.8
~ 0.7
Q)
0.6
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.6
U'
0.8
6. PREDICTED SETTLEMENTS OF
NON-IMPROVED SOFf GROUND
Fig. 9 shows the relationships between time
(t') and the settlement velocity (/lS'/!i.t') for a
non-improved soft ground. The observed data
198
o Observed
~0.15
Regression line
7. CONCLUSIONS
A settlement prediction method using the
settlement velocity is proposed for soft grounds
non-improved and improved with sand drains.
The method has the advantages of its simplicity
and capability to give satisfactorily good estimates of the consolidation settlements, and also
the support of the theoretical background.
:l:2
E
~
(J)
0.1
"t:l
;i-
'0
~0.05
E
Q)
E
Q)
(J)
500
1000
1500
Time, f (days)
2000
o
50
Eo
<t>
0
c:
(I)
::;-100
~
150
t'=O
Observed
Predicted
'I
c Po..
(J)
"Q
tL550dlys -
\..
200
all data/'
250
500
Time (days)
Fig. 10 Settlement prediction for non-improved
soft ground
References
Aboshi, T. (1969) : Soil Mechanics (Edited by T.
Mogami), Gihodo-shuppan, Tokyo, 464-465 (in
Japanese).
Asaoka, A. (1978) : Observational procedure of
settlement prediction, Soils and Foundations, 18(4),
87-101.
Atkinson, J.H. and Bransby, P.L. (1978) : The
mechanics of soils, McGraw-Hill, London.
Barron, R.A. (1948) : Consolidation of fine-grained
soils by drain wells, Trans of ASCE, 113, 718-754.
Fujii, H., Shimada, K., Nishimura, S. and Tajiri, N.
(1991) : Determination of soil parameters with
standard consolidation tests and its application to
ftnite element analysis, Trans. of JSIDRE, 154, 116 (in Japanese).
Richart, F.E.Jr. (1957) : A review of the theories for
sand drains, Proc. of ASCE, 83(SM3), 1301-1 1301-38.
Shimada, K., Fujii, H., Nishimura, S. and Tajiri, N.
(1992) : Plane strain ftnite element analysis for
consolidation settlement in soft ground improved
with packed sand drains, Trans. of JSIDRE, 162, 1-7
(in Japanese).
Yoshikuni, H., Inoue, T., Sumioka, N., Hara, H.
(1981) : On the characteristics of settlement
prediction methods by monitoring, Tsuchi-to-kiso,
29(8),7-13 (in Japanese).
Yoshikuni, H. (1979) : Design and perfonnance
management for vertical drains, Gihodo-shuppan,
Tokyo (in Japanese).