Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/bios
Review
a
Chemistry Department, Allahabad Agricultural Institute (Deemed Uni6ersity), Allahabad, India
Biomolecular Electronics and Conducting Polymer Research Group, National Physical Laboratory, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110
012, India
Abstract
Recently, conducting polymers have attracted much interest in the development of biosensors. The electrically conducting
polymers are known to possess numerous features, which allow them to act as excellent materials for immobilization of
biomolecules and rapid electron transfer for the fabrication of efficient biosensors. In the present review an attempt has been made
to describe the salient features of conducting polymers and their wide applications in health care, food industries, environmental
monitoring etc. 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Conduction polymer; Biosensor; Immobilization; Electron transfer; Tranducer
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.1. Conducting polymers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2. Historical background of electronically conducting polymers.
1.3. Conduction mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.4. Synthesis of conducting polymers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.5. Applications of conducting polymers . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Biosensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1. Transducer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2. Biocomponents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Importance of conducting polymers to biosensors . . . . . . . . . .
4. Immobilization of enzymes on conducting polymers . . . . . . . .
5. Types of biosensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1. Amperometric biosensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2. Potentiometric biosensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3. Conductometric biosensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.4. Optical biosensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.5. Calorimetric biosensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.6. Peizoelectric biosensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Applications of conducting polymers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1. Biosensors for health care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1.1. Glucose biosensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1.2. Urea biosensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1.3. Lactate biosensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
346
346
346
347
347
347
348
348
349
349
350
351
351
351
352
353
353
353
353
353
353
353
354
346
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1. Introduction
Polymers are being discarded for their traditional
roles as electric insulators to literally take charge as
conductors with a range of novel applications. Scientists from many disciplines are now combining expertise
to study organic solids that exhibit remarkable conducting properties. A large number of organic compounds, which effectively transport charge are roughly
divided into three groups i.e. charge transfer complexes/
ion radical salts, organometallic species and conjugated
organic polymers. A new class of polymers known as
intrinsically conducting polymers or electroactive conjugated polymers has recently emerged. Such materials
exhibit interesting electrical and optical properties previously found only in inorganic systems. Electronically
conducting polymers differ from all the familiar inorganic crystalline semiconductors e.g. silicon in two important features that polymers are molecular in nature
and lack long range order (Duke and Schein, 1980). A
key requirement for a polymer to become intrinsically
electrically conducting is that there should be an overlap of molecular orbitals to allow the formation of
delocalized molecular wave function. Besides this,
molecular orbitals must be partially filled so that there
is a free movement of electrons throughout the lattice
(Bloor and Movaghar, 1983).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
354
354
354
354
355
355
355
355
brane separations and chromatography. They also create new technological possibilities in design of chemical
and biochemical sensors (Trojanowicz and vel
Krawczyk, 1995; Bidan, 1992; Bartlett and Cooper,
1993).
347
348
2. Biosensors
The unprecedented interest in the development and
exploitation of analytical devices for detection, quantification and monitoring of specific chemical species has
led to the emergence of biosensors. The estimation of
metabolites such as glucose, urea, cholesterol and lactate in whole blood is of central importance in clinical
diagnostics. Biosensors represent a new trend emerging
in the diagnostic technology.
A biosensor is a device having a biological sensing
element either intimately connected to or integrated
within a transducer. The aim is to produce a digital
electronic signal, which is proportional to the concentration of a specific chemical or set of chemicals.
2.1. Transducer
The biochemical transducer or biocomponent imparts to the biosensor, selectivity or specificity. A transducer converts the biochemical signal to an electronic
signal. The transducer of an electrical device responds
in a way that a signal can be electronically amplified,
stored and displayed. Suitable transducing system can
be adapted in a sensor assembly depending on the
nature of the biochemical interaction with the species of
interest. The physical transducers vary from electrochemical, spectroscopic, thermal, piezoelectric and surface acoustic wave technology (Svorc et al., 1997;
Urban et al., 1990). The most common electrochemical
transducers being utilized are amperometric and
potentiometric.
An amperometric biosensor measures the current
produced during the oxidation or reduction of a
product or reactant usually at a constant applied potential. Such sensors have fast response times and good
sensitivity. However, the excellent specificity of the
biological component can be compromised by the partial selectivity of the electrode. This lack of specificity
requires sample preparation, separation or some compensation for interfacing signals. Potentiometric biosensors relate electrical potentials to the concentration of
analyte by using an ion-selective electrode or a gassensing electrode as the physical transducer (Lewenstam et al., 1994; Domansky et al., 1998). These are
2.2. Biocomponents
Biocomponents, which function as biochemical transducers can be enzymes, tissues, bacteria, yeast, antibodies/antigens, liposomes, organelles (Sadik and Wallace,
1993; Foulds and Lowe, 1988; Schmid, 1987). Within a
biosensor the recognition biomolecule incorporated
possesses an exquisite level of selectivity but is vulnerable to extreme conditions such as temperature, pH and
ionic strength (Karyakin et al., 1999). Most of the
biological molecules such as enzymes, receptors, antibodies, cells etc. have very short lifetime in solution
phase. Thus they have to be fixed in a suitable matrix.
The immobilization of the biological component
against the environmental conditions results in decreased enzyme activity (Schuhmann et al., 1992; Evtugyn et al., 1998). The activity of immobilized
molecules depends upon surface area, porosity, hydrophillic character of immobilizing matrix, reaction
conditions and the methodology chosen for
immobilization.
A number of techniques such as physical adsorption,
cross-linking, gel entrapment, covalent coupling etc.
have been used to immobilize biological molecules in
carrier materials as shown in Table 1.
Various matrices have been used for the immobilization of enzymes such as membranes, gels, carbon,
graphite, silica, polymeric films etc. (Trojanowicz and
vel Krawczyk, 1995; Pandey, 1992; Ikeda et al., 1985;
Gun and Lev, 1996). There is thus a great need to
design the electrodes that are compatible with the biological component that can lead to rapid electron transfer at the electrode surface. Conducting polymers are
attractive as possible materials for such applications.
349
Table 1
Conventional immobilization procedures
Method
Advantages
Physical
adsorption
No modification of
biocatalyst. Matrix can be
regenerated. Low cost
Entrapment
Cross-linking
Disadvantages
Loss of biocatalyst is
minimum. Moderate cost
Harsh treatment of
biocatalyst by toxic
chemicals
Harsh treatment by toxic
chemicals. Matrix not
regenerable
Example
Reference
Adsorption of glucose
oxidase on conducting
polymers for glucose
detection
Entrapment of urease and
glutamate dehydrogenase in
polypyrrole/polyvinyl
sulphonate films for urea
detection
Glutaraldehyde mediated
linking of lactate
dehydrogenase for lactate
estimation
GOD binding via
poly(o-amino benzoic acid)
for glucose detection
Ramanathan 1995;
Ramanathan et al., 1996a,b
350
351
5. Types of biosensors
352
Table 2
Biosensors based on conducting polymers
Substrates or species to be
determined
Enzyme
Polymer
Detection
Glucose
Glucose oxidase
Polypyrrole
Amperometry
Potentiometry
Amperometry
Amperometry
Amperometry
Amperometry
Amperometry
Amperometry
Amperometry
Amperometry
Amperometry
Amperometry
Conductometry
Amperometry
Amperometry
Amperometry
Lipids
Phenols
Urea
Poly(N-methylpyrrole)
Polyaniline
Polyindole
Glucose dehydrogenase
Polypyrrole
Polypyrrole
D-amino acid oxidase
Tyrosinase
Polypyrrole
Cholesterol oxidase and Cholesterol esterase Polypyrrole
Choline oxidase
Substituted Polypyrrole
Glutamate dehydrogenase
Polypyrrole
Fructose dehydrogenase
Polypyrrole
Pepsin
Polyaniline
Lactate oxidase
Polyphenyline di-amine
Lactate dehydrogenase
Polyaniline
Polypyrrolepolyvinyl
sulphonate
Lipase
Polyaniline
Tyrosinase
Substituted polypyrrole
Urease
Polypyrrole
Uric acid
Triglycerides
Uricase
Lipase
D-Alanine
Atrazine
Cholesterol
Choline
Glutamate
Fructose
Hemoglobin
L-Lactate
Polyaniline
Polyaniline
Conductometry
Amperometry
Amperometry
Potentiometry
Conductometry
Capacitance
Measurement
Admittance
measurement
Amperometry
Conductometry
353
354
A thin film of conducting polymer based on microelectronic ammonia gas sensor device has been developed which is the first application of conducting
polymer in gas sensor devices for commercial applications. The device is a resistor element which shows large
variations when ammonia is present in the environment
in very low concentration and enables the necessary
action or alarm activation (www.ett.bme.hu).
Use of conducting polymers in impedance type sensors provide a possibility to build up low cost, highly
sensitive and selective room temperature gas sensor
(Bartlett et al., 1989c; Charlesworth et al., 1993). They
described a number of sensors for organic sensors for
organic vapours based on PPY, poly-N-methyl pyrrole,
poly(5-carboxy indole) and polyaniline. These materials
are however advantageous due to lack of specificity i.e.
they show responses to a wide range of different gases
and vapors. But their selectivity is found to be better
than that of the inorganic materials based gas sensitive
resistors.
AAI-Abtech, a small biotechnology company in
Pennsylvania, has developed a novel sensor based on
conducting PPY on an array of micoelectrodes. It has
been shown that a simple system using Mo(V)-catalyzed conversion of iodide to iodine can detect hydrogen peroxide. The polymer incorporates molybdenum
together with iodide, hydrogen peroxide converts the
iodide to iodine, which oxidizes the PPY, resulting in a
measurable change in conductivity.
Thomas Fare and coworkers have developed an immunosensor based on conducting polymer for screening
of pesticide atrazine. Adeloju and Yuan (1999) have
described a new approach for the flow amperometric
biosensing of formate with single, double and triple
layered arrangements of the ferrocyanide mediated
PPY based biosensor. The detection of formate concentration has been found to be important in atmosphere,
natural waters and sediments. This layered structure
comprised of formate dehydrogenase, NAD and mediator and has been demonstrated for the flow amperometric biosensing of formate in aqueous media, with the
detection limit of 2.5 mM.
A cost effective polyaniline base ammonia gas sensor
has been described by Lepsenyi et al. (1999). They
deposited sensing film of polyaniline, electrochemically
doped by cyclic voltammetry on thin and thick film
electrodes where the isolation gap is formed by laser
engraving. In this work, they investigated the sensitivity, selectivity, temperature, dependency and long term
behavior of the sensor.
355
7. Conclusion
Biochemical sensors have been shown to provide
complementary and additional information to that contributed by the well-established bioanalytical techniques. Particular advantages of biochemical sensors
concern the following: the possibility of miniaturizing
the setup, in principle down to the molecular scale, the
use of well-established microsystem technologies during
manufacture, integration of signal preprocessing steps
on a chip, and the building of arrays for more complex
pattern recognition analysis. By combining the use of
electronically conducting polymers with immobilized
enzymes and by making use of the particular properties
of conducting polymers, it is possible to develop novel
enzyme-based bioelectronic devices.
Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to Dr. Krishon Lal, Director of
NPL for his interest in this field. Asha Chaubey is
grateful to CSIR, India for the award of senior research
fellowship.
References
Adeloju, S.B., Yuan, Y.J., 1999. Polypyrrole-based flow amperometric biosensor for formate, Electrochem. News, 4, online (http://
www.uws.edu.au).
Adeloju, S.B., Wallace, G.G, 1996. Conducting polymers and the
bioanalytical sciences. Analyst 121, 699 703.
Alva, S., Phadke, R.S., 1994. Conducting polymers in the fabrication
of efficient biosensors. Ind. J. Chem. 33A, 561 564.
356
357
358
Schuhmann, W., Lehn, C, Schmidt, H.L, Grundig, B., 1992. Comparison of native and chemically stabilized enzymes in amperometric enzyme electrodes. Sens. and Actuat. B 7, 393 398.
Shirakawa, H., Louis, E.J., MacDiarmid, A.G., Chiang, C.K.,
Heeger, A.J., 1977. Synthesis of electrically conducting organic
polymers: halogen derivatives of polyacetylene, (CH)x. J. Chem.
Soc. Chem .Commun., 578.
Singhal, R., Chaubey, A., Pande, K.K., Malhotra, B.D., 2000. Immobilization of Glucose oxidase on Poly(3-Hexyl Thiophene) LB
films for application to Glucose biosensor in 4th National Conference on Solid State Ionics, 3 5 March, 2000 at Indian Institute of
Technology, Mumbai.
Situmorang, M., Hibbert, D.B., Gooding, J.J., 2000. An experimental
design study of interferences of clinical relevance of polytyramine
immobilized enzyme biosensors. Electroanalysis 12, 111 119.
Situmorang, M., Gooding, J.J., Hibbert, D.B., Barnett, D., 1998.
Electrodeposited polytyramine as an immobilization matrix for
enzyme biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 13, 953 962.
Stephens, S.K., Cullen, D.C., Warner, P.J., 1998. Biosensors for
novel rapid assay methods in the food industry. New Food 1,
47 51.
Stredansky, M, Pizzariello, A., Stredanska, S., Miertus, S., 1999.
Determination of D-fructose in food stuffs by an improved amperometric biosensor based on a solid binding matrix. Anal. Commun. 36, 57 61.
Strike, D.J., de Rooij, N.F., Koudelka-Hep, M., 1993. Electrodeposition of glucose oxidase for the fabrication of miniature sensors.
Sens. Actuat. B 13, 61 64.
Sun, Z., Tachikawa, H., 1992. Enzyme-based bilayer conducting
polymer electrodes consisting of polymetallopthalocyanines and
polypyrrole-glucose oxidase thin films. Anal. Chem. 64, 1112
1117.
Sung, W.J., Bae, Y.H., 2000. A glucose oxidase electrode based on
electropolymerized conducting polymer with polyanion-enzyme
conjugated dopant. Anal. Chem. 72, 2177 2181.
Svorc, J., Miertu, S., Katrlik, J., Stredansk, M., 1997. Composite
transducer for amperometric biosensors. The glucose sensor.
Anal. Chem 69, 2086 2089.
Tatsuma, T., Watanabe, T., Watanabe, T., 1993a. Polypyrrole bioenzyme electrodes with glucose oxidase and peroxidase. Sens. Actuat. B 14, 752 753.
Tatsuma, T., Watanabe, T., Watanabe, T., 1993b. Electrochemical
characterization of polypyrrole bioenzyme electrodes with glucose
oxidase and peroxidase. J. Electroanal. Chem. 356, 245 253.
Teasdale, P.R., Wallace, G.G., 1993. Molecular recognition on conducting polymers: basis of electrochemical sensing technology.
Analyst 118, 329 334.
Tourillon, G., Garnier, F., 1983. Stability of conducting polythiophene and derivatives. J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 2042 2044.
Trojanowicz, M., vel Krawczyk, T.K., 1995. Electrochemical biosensors based on enzymes immobilized in electropolymerized films.
Mikrochim. Acta 121, 167 181.
Trojanowicz, M., vel Krawczyk, T.K., Alexander, P.W., 1997. Organic conductings as active materials in electrochemical chemosensors and biosensors. Chem. Anal. 42, 199 213.
Trojanowicz, M., Matuszewski, W., Szczepanczyk, B., Lewenstam,
A., 1993. In: Guilbault, G.G., Mascini, M. (Eds.), Uses of Immobilized Biological Compounds. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 141 150.
Umana, M., Waller, J., 1986. Protein modified electrodes: the glucose
oxidase/polypyrrole system. Anal. Chem. 58, 2979 2983.
Unwin, P.R., Bard, A.J., 1992. Ultramicroelectrode voltammetry in a
drop of solution: a new approach to the measurement of adsorption isotherms at solid liquid interface. Anal. Chem. 64, 113
119.
Urban, G., Jachimowicz, A., Kohl, F., Kuttner, H., Olcaytug, F.,
Kamper, H., Pittner, F., Mann-Buxbaum, E., Schalkhammer, T.,
Prohaska, O., Schonauer, M., 1990. High resolution thin film
359