You are on page 1of 33

Types of Strain

a
g

l
lo

lo

l lo
e=
lo

b
l

(a)

(b)

Engineering Strain:

(c)

Shear Strain:
FIGURE 2.1 Types of strain. (a) Tensile. (b) Compressive. (c) Shear. All
deformation processes in manufacturing involve strains of these types. Tensile
strains are involved in stretching sheet metal to make car bodies,
compressive strains in forging metals to make turbine disks, and shear strains
in making holes by punching.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

a
=
b

Tensile-Test
Elastic
Stress

Plastic

UTS

Fracture

Offset

lo
Ao

Original
gage
length, lo

tan-1 E
eo
eu

ef

Strain (for lo = 1)
$l

le
Uniform elongation
lu

lf

Neck

Fracture
Post-uniform elongation

Total elongation
lf
Af
(a)

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

(b)

FIGURE 2.2 (a) Original and final shape of


a standard tensile-test specimen. (b)
Outline of a tensile-test sequence showing
different stages in the elongation of the
specimen.

Mechanical Properties
E (GPa)

Y (MPa)

UTS (MPa)

Elongation
in 50 mm (%)

Poissons
Ratio ()

METALS (WROUGHT)
Aluminum and its alloys
69-79
35-550
90-600
45-5
0.31-0.34
Copper and its alloys
105-150
76-1100
140-1310
65-3
0.33-0.35
Lead and its alloys
14
14
20-55
50-9
0.43
Magnesium and its alloys
41-45
130-305
240-380
21-5
0.29-0.35
Molybdenum and its alloys 330-360
80-2070
90-2340
40-30
0.32
Nickel and its alloys
180-214 105-1200
345-1450
60-5
0.31
Steels
190-200 205-1725
415-1750
65-2
0.28-0.33
Stainless steels
190-200
240-480
480-760
60-20
0.28-0.30
Titanium and its alloys
80-130
344-1380
415-1450
25-7
0.31-0.34
Tungsten and its alloys
350-400
550-690
620-760
0
0.27
NONMETALLIC MATERIALS
Ceramics
70-1000

140-2600
0
0.2
Diamond
820-1050

Glass and porcelain


70-80

140
0
0.24
Rubbers
0.01-0.1

0.5
Thermoplastics
1.4-3.4

7-80
1000-5
0.32-0.40
Thermoplastics, reinforced
2-50

20-120
10-1

Thermosets
3.5-17

35-170
0
0.34
Boron fibers
380

3500
0

Carbon fibers
275-415

2000-5300
1-2

Glass fibers (S, E)


73-85

3500-4600
5

Kevlar fibers (29, 49, 129)


70-113

3000-3400
3-4

Spectra fibers (900, 1000)


73-100

2400-2800
3

Note: In the upper table, the lowest values for E, Y , and UTS and the highest values for
elongation are for the pure metals. Multiply GPa by 145,000 to obtain psi, and MPa by
145 to obtain psi. For example 100 GPa = 14,500 ksi, and 100 MPa = 14,500 psi.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

TABLE 2.1 Typical mechanical properties


of various materials at room temperature.
See also Tables 10.1, 10.4, 10.8, 11.3 and
11.7.

Loading & Unloading; Elongation


mm
80

50

100

150

200

250

70
rity
-pu
High

Elongation (%)

Unload

i
m
alu

Stress

60

50

nu
m
-an
ne
ale
d

40

Brass
Monel

30

1100
-O Alu
minum

20

M i l d st e
Stru
el
ctural
silicon st
eel

Load
Elastic recovery
Permanent
deformation

Strain

Copper
0

FIGURE 2.3
Schematic illustration of
loading and unloading of a tensile-test
specimen. Note that during unloading the
curve follows a path parallel to the original
elastic slope.
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

M a g n e si u m

10

3 4 5 6 7
Gage length (in.)

10

FIGURE 2.4 Total elongation in a tensile


test as a function of original gage length for
various metals. Because necking is a local
phenomenon, elongation decreases with
gage length. Standard gage length is usually
2 in. (50 mm), although shorter ones can
be used if larger specimens are not
available.

True Stress and True Strain


True stress
P
=
A

True strain
! "
! "
! "2
! "
Ao
l
Do
Do
= ln
= ln
= ln
= 2 ln
lo
A
D
D

TABLE 2.2 Comparison of engineering and


true strains in tension

e
!

0.01
0.01

0.05
0.049

0.1
0.095

0.2
0.18

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

0.5
0.4

1
0.69

2
1.1

5
1.8

10
2.4

True Stress - True Strain Curve


K
Yf

Log S

S= KEn

0
0

E1

1
True strain (E)

Ef

Log E
(b)

(a)
100
True stress (psi x 103)

True stress

Fracture

K = 25,000
n

10

n = 0.25

1
0.0001

0.001

0.01
True strain (E)

0.1

(c)

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

FIGURE 2.5 (a) True stress--true strain


curve in tension. Note that, unlike in an
engineering stress-strain curve, the slope is
always positive and that the slope
decreases with increasing strain. Although
in the elastic range stress and strain are
proportional, the total curve can be
approximated by the power expression
shown. On this curve, Y is the yield stress
and Yf is the flow stress. (b) True stresstrue strain curve plotted on a log-log
scale. (c) True stress-true strain curve in
tension for 1100-O aluminum plotted on a
log-log scale. Note the large difference in
the slopes in the elastic and plastic ranges.
Source: After R. M. Caddell and R. Sowerby.

Power Law Flow Rule


Material
Aluminum, 1100-O
2024-T4
5052-O
6061-O
6061-T6
7075-O
Brass, 7030, annealed
85-15, cold rolled
Bronze (phosphor), annealed
Cobalt-base alloy, heat treated
Copper, annealed
Molybdenum, annealed
Steel, low carbon, annealed
1045 hot rolled
1112 annealed
1112 cold rolled
4135 annealed
4135 cold rolled
4340 annealed
17-4 P-H, annealed
52100, annealed
304 stainless, annealed
410 stainless, annealed
Note: 100 MPa = 14,500 psi.

K (MPa)
180
690
210
205
410
400
895
580
720
2070
315
725
530
965
760
760
1015
1100
640
1200
1450
1275
960

n
0.20
0.16
0.13
0.20
0.05
0.17
0.49
0.34
0.46
0.50
0.54
0.13
0.26
0.14
0.19
0.08
0.17
0.14
0.15
0.05
0.07
0.45
0.10

TABLE 2.3 Typical values for K and n in


Eq. 2.11 at room temperature.
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Flow rule:
= Kn
K = Strength coefficient
n = Strain hardening exponent

True Stress-True Strain for Various Materials


180

304 Stainless steel

160

7030 Brass, as received


8650 Steel

1000

1112 CR Steel

7030 Brass, annealed

120

800

1020 Steel
4130 Steel

100

Copper, annealed

80

600

2024-T36 Al
2024-O Al

60
40

400

1100-O Al

6061-O Al

200
20
1100-H14 Al
0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8
1.0
1.2
True strain (E)

1.4

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

1.6

1.8

0
2.0

MPa

140
True stress (psi x 103)

1200

FIGURE 2.6 True stress-true strain


curves in tension at room
temperature for various metals. The
point of intersection of each curve at
the ordinate is the yield stress Y; thus,
the elastic portions of the curves are
not indicated. When the K and n
values are determined from these
curves, they may not agree with those
given in Table 2.3 because of the
different sources from which they
were collected. Source: S. Kalpakjian.

Idealized Stress-Strain Curves


Y

S= Y

EE

S
=

Stress

S= EP

S= Y

tan-1 E

Y/E

Strain

(b)

E p!
S=Y +

S Y

E -Y /
(
E
p
+

E)

S

tan-1 Ep

(c)

Y/E

(d)

(e)

FIGURE 2.7 Schematic illustration of various types of idealized stressstrain curves. (a) Perfectly elastic. (b) Rigid, perfectly plastic. (c)
Elastic, perfectly plastic. (d) Rigid, linearly strain hardening. (e) Elastic,
linearly strain hardening. The broken lines and arrows indicate
unloading and reloading during the test.
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

True stress

(a)

S = KEn
n=1
0 <n <1
n=0

1
True strain (P)

FIGURE 2.8 The effect of strain-hardening


exponent n on the shape of true stresstrue strain curves. When n = 1, the
material is elastic, and when n = 0, it is
rigid and perfectly plastic.

Temperature and Strain Rate Effects


40

Yield str
en

100
gth

40
50

200

400

600
800 1000
Temperature (F)

1200

0
1400

40

20

40

10
8

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

60

50

6
4

1
10-6

FIGURE 2.9 Effect of temperature on mechanical properties


of a carbon steel. Most materials display similar temperature
sensitivity for elastic modulus, yield strength, ultimate
strength, and ductility.

100

80

20

60

80

150

ation
Elong
0

200

10

10

600

Tensile strength (psi x 103)

Stress (psi 3 103)

Stress (MPa)

200

400

modul
us
Tensile stren
g th

600

400

200

Elastic

Elongation (%)

Elastic modulus (GPa)

120

200

200

00

(C)

30C

MPa

30

10-4

10-2 100
102
Strain rate (s-1)

104

106

FIGURE 2.10 The effect of strain rate on the


ultimate tensile strength of aluminum. Note that as
temperature increases, the slope increases. Thus,
tensile strength becomes more and more sensitive
to strain rate as temperature increases. Source:
After J. H. Hollomon.

Typical Strain Rates in Metalworking


Process
Cold Working
Forging, rolling
Wire and tube drawing
Explosive forming
Hot working and warm working
Forging, rolling
Extrusion
Machining
Sheet-metal forming
Superplastic forming

TABLE 2.4
processes.

True Strain

Deformation Speed (m/s)

Strain Rate (s1 )

0.1-0.5
0.05-0.5
0.05-0.2

0.1-100
0.1-100
10-100

1 103
1 104
10 105

0.1-0.5
2-5
1-10
0.1-0.5
0.2-3

0.1-30
0.1-1
0.1-100
0.05-2
104 102

1 103
101 102
103 106
1 102
104 102

Typical ranges of strain, deformation speed, and strain rates in metalworking

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Effect on Homologous Temperature

Strain rate sensitivity exponent (m)

0.25
Copper
Steel
Aluminum
304 Stainless
Titanium
Rene 41
Mo-T2C

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.8
Homologous temperature, T
Tm
0.2

0.4

0.6

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

1.0

FIGURE 2.11 Dependence of the strainrate sensitivity exponent m on the


homologous temperature T/Tm for various
materials. T is the testing temperature and
Tm is the melting point of the metal, both
on the absolute scale. The transition in the
slopes of the curve occurs at about the
recrystallization temperature of the
metals. Source: After F. W. Boulger.

Strain Rate Effects


C
psi 103
12-2
45-5
35-3
60-2
1.6-0.3
20-2

Material
Temperature, C
MPa
m
Aluminum
200-500
82-14 0.07-0.23
Aluminum alloys
200-500
310-35
0-0.20
Copper
300-900
240-20 0.06-0.17
Copper alloys (brasses)
200-800
415-14 0.02-0.3
Lead
100-300
11-2
0.1-0.2
Magnesium
200-400
140-14 0.07-0.43
Steel
Low carbon
900-1200
24-7
165-48 0.08-0.22
Medium carbon
900-1200
23-7
160-48 0.07-0.24
Stainless
600-1200
60-5
415-35 0.02-0.4
Titanium
200-1000
135-2
930-14 0.04-0.3
Titanium alloys
200-1000
130-5
900-35 0.02-0.3

Ti-6Al-4V
815-930
9.5-1.6
65-11 0.50-0.80
Zirconium
200-1000
120-4
830-27 0.04-0.4
at a strain rate of 2 104 s1 .
Note: As temperature increases, C decreases and m increases. As strain
increases, C increases and m may increase or decrease, or it may become
negative within certain ranges of temperature and strain.
Source: After T. Altan and F.W. Boulger.

TABLE 2.5 Approximate range of values for C and m in


Eq. (2.16) for various annealed metals at true strains
ranging from 0.2 to 1.0.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

= C m
C = Strength coefficient
m = Strain-rate sensitivity exponent

Effect of Strain Rate Sensitivity on


Elongation
50

Post-uniform elongation (%)

Total elongation (%)

103

102
Ti5A12.5Sn
Ti6A14V
Zircaloy4
High- and ultra-highcarbon steels
10

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

m
(a)

0.6

0.7

40

30

A-K Steel
HSLA Steel
C.R. Aluminum (1100)
2036-T4 Aluminum
3003-O Aluminum
5182-O Aluminum
5182-O Al (150C)
70-30 Brass
Zn-Ti Alloy

20

10

0.02
m
(b)

0.04

0.06

FIGURE 2.12 (a) The effect of strain-rate sensitivity exponent m on the total elongation for various metals.
Note that elongation at high values of m approaches 1000%. Source: After D. Lee and W.A. Backofen. (b) The
effect of strain-rate sensitivity exponent m on the post uniform (after necking) elongation for various metals.
Source: After A.K. Ghosh.
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Hydrostatic Pressure & Barreling


MPa
5

600

300

900

True strain at fracture (0f)

Copper
Aluminum

Zinc

1
Cast iron
Magnesium
0

20

40
60
80
Hydrostatic pressure (ksi)

100

120

FIGURE 2.13 The effect of hydrostatic pressure on


true strain at fracture in tension for various metals.
Even cast iron becomes ductile under high pressure.
Source: After H.L.D. Pugh and D. Green.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

FIGURE 2.14 Barreling in compressing a


round solid cylindrical specimen (7075-O
aluminum) between flat dies. Barreling is
caused by friction at the die-specimen
interfaces, which retards the free flow of
the material. See also Figs.6.1 and 6.2.
Source: K.M. Kulkarni and S. Kalpakjian.

Plane-Strain Compression Test

w > 5h
w > 5b

Yield stress in plane strain:

b > 2h to 4h
b

2
Y = Y = 1.15Y
3
!

FIGURE 2.15 Schematic illustration of the plane-strain


compression test. The dimensional relationships shown
should be satisfied for this test to be useful and
reproducible. This test gives the yield stress of the
material in plane strain, Y. Source: After A. Nadai and H.
Ford.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Tension & Compression; Baushinger


Effect
Tension
S

16

12
8

Tension
Compression

50

MPa

True stress (ksi)

100

P
2Y

0
0

0.1

0.2

0.3 0.4 0.5


True strain (E)

0.6

0
0.7
Compression

FIGURE 2.16 True stress-true strain curve


in tension and compression for aluminum.
For ductile metals, the curves for tension
and compression are identical. Source: After
A.H. Cottrell.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

FIGURE 2.17 Schematic illustration of the Bauschinger


effect. Arrows show loading and unloading paths. Note the
decrease in the yield stress in compression after the
specimen has been subjected to tension. The same result is
obtained if compression is applied first, followed by
tension, whereby the yield stress in tension decreases.

Disk & Torsion Tests


F
l

rF
r

r
t

Fracture

2P
=
dt

FIGURE 2.18 Disk test on a brittle


material, showing the direction of loading
and the fracture path. This test is useful for
brittle materials, such as ceramics and
carbides.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

rF
l

T
=
2r2t

r
=
l

FIGURE 2.19 A typical torsion-test specimen. It is


mounted between the two heads of a machine and is
twisted. Note the shear deformation of an element in the
reduced section.

Simple vs. Pure Shear


S3

T3
G
T1

T1

S1

G
2

S1 = -S3

T3

S3
(a)

(b)

FIGURE 2.20 Comparison of (a) simple shear and (b) pure shear. Note
that simple shear is equivalent to pure shear plus a rotation.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Three- and Four-Point Bend-Tests

Mc
=
I

Maximum
bending
moment
(a)

(b)

FIGURE 2.21 Two bend-test methods for brittle materials: (a) threepoint bending; (b) four-point bending. The shaded areas on the beams
represent the bending-moment diagrams, described in texts on the
mechanics of solids. Note the region of constant maximum bending
moment in (b), whereas the maximum bending moment occurs only at
the center of the specimen in (a).

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Hardness Tests
Shape of indentation
Test

Brinell

Vickers

Indenter
10-mm steel
or tungsten
carbide ball

Diamond pyramid

Side view

Top view

D
d

d
L

136

Load, P
500 kg
1500 kg
3000 kg

1120 kg

Hardness number

HB =

2P
(PD)(D -

HV =

D2 - d 2

1.854P
L2

b
Knoop

Diamond pyramid

L/b = 7.11
b/t = 4.00

HK =

25 g5 kg

14.2P
L2

Rockwell
A
C
D
B
F
G
E

120
Diamond cone
t = mm
1
16

in. diameter

steel ball
1
8

t = mm

- in. diameter

steel ball

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

60 kg
150 kg
100 kg

HRA
HRC
HRD

100 kg
60 kg
150 kg

HRB
HRF
HRG

100 kg

HRE

= 100 - 500t

= 130 - 500t

FIGURE 2.22
General
characteristics of hardness
testing methods. The Knoop test
is known as a microhardness
test because of the light load and
small impressions. Source: After
H.W. Hayden, W.G. Moffatt, and
V. Wulff.

Hardness Test Considerations

d
(b)

Carbon steels,
annealed 5.3
1

200

500

150
Carbon steels,
3.2 cold worked
1

150

100

0
10

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

400

250

50

FIGURE 2.25 Bulk deformation in mild steel under a


spherical indenter. Note that the depth of the
deformed zone is about one order of magnitude
larger than the depth of indentation. For a hardness
test to be valid, the material should be allowed to
fully develop this zone. This is why thinner specimens
require smaller indentations. Source: Courtesy of
M.C. Shaw and C.T.Yang.

200

MPa
300

20

3.4

100

Aluminum, cold worked

30
40
50
60
Yield stress (psi x 103 )

50

70

Brinell hardness (kg/mm2)

FIGURE 2.23 Indentation geometry for Brinell


hardness testing: (a) annealed metal; (b) workhardened metal. Note the difference in metal
flow at the periphery of the impressions.

100

Hardness (psi x 103)

(a)

0
80

FIGURE 2.24 Relation between Brinell hardness and yield


stress for aluminum and steels. For comparison, the Brinell
hardness (which is always measured in kg/mm2) is converted
to psi units on the left scale.

400

Endurance limit

Alu
m in
um
a

60
40

lloy

20

100
0
0
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1010
Number of cycles, N

Ph
eno
lic

40

Dially
l-phthalate

30

ol
Ny
Po yca
lon
r
b
lys
o
n
ulfo ate (dry)
ne
PTFE
P

200

14
-T
6

el

50

Ep
oxy

20
10
0
103

(a)

104

105

106

8
6
4

FIGURE 2.26 Typical S-N curves for two


metals. Note that, unlike steel, aluminum
does not have an endurance limit.

2
0
107

Number of cycles, N
(b)

0.8

FIGURE 2.27 Ratio of fatigue strength to tensile strength


for various metals, as a function of tensile strength.
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Endurance limit/tensile strength

300

St
e

Stress amplitude, S (MPa)

10
45

psi x 103

500

psi x 103

60

80

20

Stress amplitude, S (MPa)

Fatigue

MPa
200 400 600 800 1000 1200

0.7
Titanium

0.6

Steels

0.5

Cast irons
Copper alloys

0.4
0.3
Cast
magnesium
alloys

0.2
0.1
0

50

Aluminum alloys
Wrought
magnesium alloys
100

150

Tensile strength (psi x 103)

200

Creep & Impact


Rupture

Strain

Pendulum

Primary

Specimen
(10 x 10 x 75 mm)

Tertiary
Pendulum
Specimen
(10 x 10 x 55 mm)

Secondary
Notch
(a)

Instantaneous
deformation

(b)

Time

FIGURE 2.28 Schematic illustration of a typical


creep curve. The linear segment of the curve
(constant slope) is useful in designing
components for a specific creep life.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

FIGURE 2.29 Impact test specimens: (a) Charpy;


(b) lzod.

Residual Stresses
Tensile

b c

Compressive
(a)

(c)
a
d
o
e
f

(b)

(d)

FIGURE 2.30 Residual stresses developed in bending a beam made of an elastic, strain-hardening material.
Note that unloading is equivalent to applying an equal and opposite moment to the part, as shown in (b).
Because of nonuniform deformation, most parts made by plastic deformation processes contain residual
stresses. Note that the forces and moments due to residual stresses must be internally balanced.
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Distortion due to Residual Stress


Before

After

Before

After

(b)

(a)
Before

After

(c)

FIGURE 2.31 Distortion of parts with residual stresses after cutting or slitting: (a) rolled sheet or plate; (b)
drawn rod; (c) thin-walled tubing. Because of the presence of residual stresses on the surfaces of parts, a
round drill may produce an oval-shaped hole because of relaxation of stresses when a portion is removed.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Elimination of Residual Stresses


Tension
S!c

Stress
Compressive Tensile

Y
St

S!t

St

Sc
Sc
2Y

Compression
(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

FIGURE 2.32 Elimination of residual stresses by stretching. Residual stresses can be also reduced or
eliminated by thermal treatments, such as stress relieving or annealing.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

State of Stress in Metalworking


!3
!1

!1
!3
(a)
!2
!1

!3
!1

!3

!2

(b)
!2
!1
!3

!3
!1

!2

(c)
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

FIGURE 2.33 The state of stress in various metalworking


operations. (a) Expansion of a thin-walled spherical shell under
internal pressure. (b) Drawing of round rod or wire through a
conical die to reduce its diameter; see Section 6.5 (c) Deep
drawing of sheet metal with a punch and die to make a cup; see
Section 7.6.

Strain State in Necking

2
3

a
Distribution of
axial stress
Distribution of
radial or
tangential stress

Maximum axial stress


Average axial true stress
S = True stress in
uniaxial tension

FIGURE 2.34 Stress distribution in the


necked region of a tension-test specimen.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Correction factor due to Bridgman:

=!
av

2R
1+
a

1
" #$

a %&
1+
2R

States of Stress
!1 !3

!1
!3
!3

!3
!1
(a)

(b)

!1

!1

!1

!3

!3
(c)

(d)

!3

!2

!1

p
p

!2

!1

p
p

!3

(e)

(f)

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

FIGURE 2.35 Examples of states of stress:


(a) plane stress in sheet stretching; there
are no stresses acting on the surfaces of
the sheet. (b) plane stress in compression;
there are no stresses acting on the sides of
the specimen being compressed. (c) plane
strain in tension; the width of the sheet
remains constant while being stretched. (d)
plane strain in compression (see also Fig.
2.15); the width of the specimen remains
constant due to the restraint by the
groove. (e) Triaxial tensile stresses acting
on an element. (f) Hydrostatic
compression of an element. Note also that
an element on the cylindrical portion of a
thin-walled tube in torsion is in the
condition of both plane stress and plane
strain (see also Section 2.11.7).

Yield Criteria
!3
!1

!3

Tension

!1

!3

!1
Y

!3

Maximum-shear
stress criterion

Compression

max min = Y

!1 Tension
Distortion-energy
criterion
!3

!3
!1
!3

Maximum-shear-stress criterion:

!3

!1

!1

Compression

!1

!1

Distortion-energy criterion:
(1 2)2 + (2 3)2 + (3 1)2 = 2Y 2

!3

FIGURE 2.36 Plane-stress diagrams for maximum


-shear-stress and distortion-energy criteria.
Note that S2 = 0.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Flow Stress and Work of Deformation

True stress

Yf

Flow stress:

n
K
1
Y =
n+1

Y
u1

0
0

!1

Specific energy

True strain (!)

u=

FIGURE 2.37 Schematic illustration of


true stress-true strain curve showing yield
stress Y, average flow stress, specific
energy u1 and flow stress Yf.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Ideal & Redundant Work

(a)

Total specific energy:


utotal = uideal + u f riction + uredundant

(b)

Efficiency:
(c)
FIGURE 2.38 Deformation of grid patterns in a
workpiece: (a) original pattern; (b) after ideal
deformation; (c) after inhomogeneous deformation,
requiring redundant work of deformation. Note that
(c) is basically (b) with additional shearing, especially
at the outer layers. Thus (c) requires greater work of
deformation than (b). See also Figs. 6.3 and 6.49.
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

uideal
=
utotal

You might also like