Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DB
DB-AP-Al
CTPB/AP/Al
HTPB/AP/Al
Isp (s) at
1000/14.7 psi
220-230
260-265
260-265
260-265
Tc (K)
Al %
r (cm/s)
@1000 psi
Fabrication
0
20-21
15-17
4-17
1.14
1.98
1.14
1.02
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.40
Extruded
Extruded
Cast
Cast
(g/cm )
2530
3866
3370-3490
3370-3490
1.60
1.79
1.76
1.85
(1)
Lecture 16
Page 1 of 3
Consider also a linearized model for the effect of the particulates, of the form
ue
= 1 fx
ueo
(at fixed Tc )
(2)
1 cs 1 + (1 ) ln(1 ) ; = 1 Pe
(small particles)
f = 2 2c
pg
Pc
1 (l arg e particles)
(b) For
r 2f
;
3 rf
( x Al )OPT
xO PT
1.85
(3)
Pe
J
= 0.01, g = 1.25, Mg = 18g / mol, cs = 1260
, calculate ( x A l )
for
O PT
Pc
KgK
g Isp = ve =
e
2Cp Tc 1
Pc
which is proportional to
(a)
ve (1 fx ) 1 + rx
To optimize, take the logarithmic derivative and equate to zero
Lecture 16
Page 2 of 3
f
1
r
+
=0
1 fx
2 1 + rx
2f (1 + rx) = r (1 fx)
r - 2f = 3rfx
r - 2f
3rf
xOP T =
and then
( x Al )OPT
xOPT
1.85
2
cpg
values,
= 1 - (0.01)0.25/1.25 = 0.6012
f =
1
1260
1
2
2309
xO P T =
Cpg =
1.25 8.314
= 2309 J / Kg / K
0.25 0.018
0.3988 ln(0.3988)
1 +
= 0.3934
0.6012
1.41 2 0.3934
3 1.41 0.3934
xO P T = 0.3746
( X Al )O P T
0.3746
= 0.2025
1.85
20.3% Al loading
For the case of larger particle, the class derivation showed f=1, and so
xOPT =
1.41 2 1
< 0
3 1.41 1
This nonsensical result simply means there is no good Al loading in this case.
The losses due to the particles are stronger than the gains due to increased
temperature, so no Aluminum should be added.
Fortunately, the particles are small, not large.
Lecture 16
Page 3 of 3