present Ses, thoogh 3 ETHNOGRAPHY AND REALISM ot tlw that that the probe in that research need n my view empirical rear Felection on te practice und produc Ehlowpn Bat there te expe fom that comerp dub about the widesprend aceptance of‘dry Bi aews van on the basi of false premc und 6among ethnogee sumptions gem Gn the Fealeg an tea derived ro Wiliam James rather than from leche specie hee ate worlds of eed ie ig games, Pri v's spplication af hese eas vo the ther cultures. Winch arpues that we can nd the Belch and actions of peop ina naiey sey n our ov, for example Use surrounding Lande resp ef lesop 196 snd here wat wide reco 1978)"Avariety ofa sun's book The Sacre of Se in (Kuhn 1962}. Kun argued that we eannet see the nceas the cumslave development of more scare ch hneweige sbt the ea mena oer td understood, there Belngemboded“This because what counts a edence, nd isn tad changes wii ng Aes Agena radio, sucht the ea ph (ental experiment ‘of what as e are to give tothe cain iatre especially ive coats of ethnography compared ei flection? And why should ome ‘ales be pabished "a? Of cour in place of theto recognte that relat Frere agent danger of cures nt a crne: by Se an maintain tet ine existence phen ‘erin about the vali of any knowledge tay someiner be faced wth the asempeone re crreny ke wb bond entoable ge sya een clement of Pat of realy and fo at poet of view dent of The mais tue of ay hnowledge cn by “independence hee fing nor slerefuing always depends om other cond wheter other actor interen for toca esse ings have anexiremely nes incace o im of wcial esearch to repr us aay be cw which mabes some features athe pheno Florantand ethers irlerant Thus tere canefor such cect dying ying tha ml Wether we ty of any acco Mere are srt ofa ephin, ora indiestore held bythe people producing them. Hess "Sk of undenstinding ‘suspend any of her/his own Bliss that conic thon being dexibed and Cxplney ates hte et or fait ofan account carer no itpicaton for how Puied. On the other and, we may we acco nformatin about tie cn Hee ne mu be enced i tenn of the Sof evr ef‘hat what ot Sa hooper eed wit + ark choice between nave realism and4 BY WHAT CRITERIA SHOULD ETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH BE JUDGED? eres Considerable debate abou what consuls good ethno. grap and indeed: about wt Kc osionson hse to be ond among ke whem hee, ‘There are thote who argue Dat we mut apply theme criteria (ethnographic research as are employed ty quandatre Uke rounds hat ete ar the criteria ‘work should be judged. From this plat is one method among ote and