Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ORAL ORDER: Having reviewed the parties' briefing (D.I. 359, 373, 375) and associated exhibits related
to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Portions of John G. Webster's Expert Report (D.I. 358) ("Motion"), IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED. Plaintiff has not shown that it has suffered, or is
likely to suffer, any significant prejudice from Defendants' belated production of a single document.
Furthermore, regarding Defendants' expert's reliance on his personal observations of the manufacturing
process, the record does not establish that Plaintiff asked to observe Defendants' manufacturing
process, and Defendants' expert's reference to the manufacturing process is not untimely. Whatever
prejudice Plaintiff may have suffered, or may suffer in the future, does not justify the requested relief
(i.e., striking the entirety of Defendants' expert's opinion for one of the accused products as it relates to
the '779 patent). ORDERED by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/17/15. (ntl) (Entered: 08/17/2015)