20 a 2 2B m4 25 FRANCIS SHIVERS. PO Box 3487 Los Angeles, CA, 901 323-606-3525 1048, Defendant, In Pro Per Figg AL os noe HE, Aus frerois She Rey SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE GOUNTY OF LOS ANGELES |The People Of The State Of California, vs. Francis Shivers, Plainiiff, Defendant CASE NO. 2WA00673 NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION OF ELIZABETH GERTZ NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS OF CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE Notice of Disqualification of Elizabeth Gertz, Noti hereby given to the Honorable Kathryn Solorzano, the Los Angeles Superior Court, its presiding Judge, and the Los Angeles City Attorneys Office, that Elizabeth Gertz, is disqualified from L.A.S.C. CASE NO. 2WA00673 due to extreme conflicts of interest. NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION OF ELIZABETH GERTZ,n 2 B 4 15 16 "7 18 9 20 21 2 23 Bry 28 On July 13, 2015, a document was filed in that case entitled "PERJURY COMMITT BY PAULEY PERRETTE & ELIZABETH GERTZ PROSECUTOR MISCONDUCT" ED providing undeniable evidence showing that: - Elizabeth Gertz, fabricated a false accusation of a violent crime, during a conversation ON THE RECORD with Judge Kathryn Solorzano, (apparently an unwitting participant), ~ That accusation was both legally and factually false; there was a Los Angeles Superior ‘Court ruling that no such violent crime took place, (the court further emphasized its ruling, stating "Zind of story."). That L.A.S.C. ruling was based primarily upon testimony from witness (Pauley Perrette) that the violent crime did not take place, and the fact that her attorneys aiso agreed it did not take place. ~ That ruling and factual case history remained consistent for a decade, throughout numerous contentions litigations in the underlying family law case in which it was a material issue, until Elizabeth Gertz falsely stated ON THE RECORD that a violent crime had occurred, prompting Judge Solorzano ON THE RECORD (6, literally out of thin air, imagine the details of a violent scenario, and ask Gertz if what she imagined had actually happened. ON THE RECORD, and with full knowledge it was false, Ms. Gertz replied "Yes". - ON THE RECORD, Ms. Gertz then stated she would confer with the witness (Pauley Perrette) and inform her that she was to testify to this newly fabricated false accusation of a violent crime. NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION OF ELIZABETH GERTZ“4 15 16 "7 18 19 20 21 2 23 Py 25 ~ Minutes later, immediately following said conference with Ms. Gertz, the witness (Pauley Perrette) then testified ON THE RECORD to the newly fabricated accusation of a violent crime, diametrically inconsistent with her prior testimonies of the past decade, suddenly parroting the judges imagined scenario. All of the above took place ON THE RECORD. Alll references and transcripts are provided in the aforementioned document filed July 13, 2015. CONCLUSION Given these facts, undeniable as documented on the record, it is clear that twelve reasonable jurors could easily conclude that: Ms. Gertz, misled Judge Solorzano into imagining the fuise scenario, then seized upon her imagined scenario, then during her "conference" with the witness conspired to elicit perjury parroting the false accusation, in order to procure a wrongful conviction and incarcerate an innocent person. Considering it all took place on the record, save for Gertzs "conference" with the witness, it is difficult to imagine a reasonable person not concluding so. With these facts now placed on record, Ms. Gertz should be facing criminal charges for felonies committed. The California State Bar has recommended I refer her to local law enforcement for just that purpose, and I am filing a Grand Jury complaint in order to help ensure review of her apparently criminal actions. ‘As a result, itis likely I will be the primary witness in these proceedings in which Ms. ‘Gertz. is the potential defendant, and which may lead to her physical incarceration, and NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION OF ELIZABETH GERTZ16 7 18 19 20 21 2 23 28 the loss of her license to practice law. In addition to all of the above, which took place ON THE RECORD, I also maintain that Ms. Gertz has made numerous verbal threats to me outside the courtroom, over a period of five years, specifically threatening me in various ways that (paraphrasing) if T did not remain silent about crimes and misconduct she had engaged in, she would use her position to retaliate and have me wrongly incarcerated. Ms. Gertz has then followed through and engaged in 2 pattern of actions which appear to be fulfillment of her threats. Additionally, and for obvious reasons, it appears federal civil litigation involving these actions of Ms, Gertz is inevitable, in which again I will be the primary witness against Ms. Gertz. Also, subsequent to this information being placed on record in the aforementioned document filed July 13, 2015, the actions of Ms. Gertz appear consistent with a person who is guilty of the crimes documented, and consistent with a person continuing to maintain the resulting damage, further cementing any potential public perception. For the reasons stated above, Elizabeth Gertz, has extreme conflicts of interest, and is disqualified from further participating in LASC case no. 2WA00673 Additionally, this is to hereby notify all parties that I, Francis Shivers, have information, experience, and evidence which would be vital to ANY defendant in ANY case in which ‘Ms. Gertz should act as prosecutor, and that I am ready, willing, and able to provide testimony and evidence showing these facts to any jury and any court in the future. NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION OF ELIZABETH GERTZ10 u 20 au 2 23 24 #** Notice regarding the Honorable Kathryn Solorzano: Despite what could be construed as the suspicious nature of the record showing Kathryn Solorzano’s involvement with the aforementioned crimes, which took place in her courtroom, under her watch, and with her own involvement, I do NOT believe she had knowledge of what was taking place, nor do I believe she was complicit with them. It appears she was merely "duped" by Ms. Gertz. into imagining a false scenario, and it was Gertz. who then unethically seized upon Kathryn Solorzano's imagination for her own ulterior purposes. I have expressed this to the California State Bar, and will similarly express this to the Los Angeles County Grand Jury. Therefore, at this time I do NOT believe Kathryn Solorzano is disqualified, and I believe she will do everything in her power to act ina manner which will lead any reasonable person to conclude that she was NOT complicit with these crimes, and will to fulfill her duties to uphold the publics confidence in the judicial proc I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, Sys Francis Shivers NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION OF ELIZABETH GERTZ