LABOR STANDARDS and SOCIAL LEGISLATION COURSE OUTLINE (2015 Revised Edition) (D. ©. GUTIERREZ) PART ONE-INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS Section 1. Labor Law in General 1.01. LABOR LAW DEFINED - SEE ANY LABOR OR LAW DICTIONARY * Maternity Children’s Hospital v. Secretary of Labor, 174 SCRA 632 [1989] 1.02, LAW CLASSIFICATION - LABOR STANDARDS, LABOR RELATIONS, AND WELFARE LAWS — See Books and Titles, Labor Code of the Philippines, P.D. No. 442, As Amended. Labor Standards * Pefiaranda v. Baganga Plywood Comp., 489 SCRA 94 [2008] * Batong Buhay Goldimines, Inc. v. Dela Sema,312 SCRA 22 [1999] 4.03. BASIS FOR ENACTMENT — CONSTITUTION (1987) - ART. Il, Secs. 5, 18; ART. 13, Seo. 1 Police Power = CMS Estate, Inc. v. Social Security System, 132 SCRA 106 [1984] ® Asociacion de Agricultores de Talisay-Silay Inc. v. Talisay-Silay Milling Co., Inc., 88 SCRA 294 [1979] 1.04. SOURCES OF LAW A. Labor Code and Related Special Legislation I (Implementing Rules) B. Contract - Art. 1305-1306, NCC = Kapisanan ete. v. C.4, 487 SCRA 487 [2006] C. Collective Bargaining Agreement * DOLE Phils., v. Pawis ng Makabayang Obrero, 395 SCRA 112 [2003]1.06. 1.07. 4.08. D. Past Practices = Davao Fruits Corporation v. Associated Labor Union, 225 SCRA 562 [1993] +r Samahang Manggagawa etc. v. NLRC, 295 SCRA 171 [1998] American Wire and Cable Daily Rated Employees Union v. ‘American Wire and Cable Co., Inc., 457 SCRA 684 [2005] Pag-asa Stee! Works, Inc. v. C.A., 486 SCRA 476 [2006] m Company Policies = China Banking Corporation v. Borromeo, 440 SCRA 621 [2004] LAW AND WORKER: a anu) evel Plant v. Hon. Deputy Minister of Labor, 153 SCRA 38 = Vicente G. Sinco, Philippine Constitutional Law, 2" Ed. (1960), pp. 130-134 Joaquin G. Bernas, The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines: A Commentary, 2003 Ed. pp. 447-445. LABOR CASE = Lapanday Agricultural Development Corporation v. Court of Appeals, 324 SCRA 39 (2000) = Villamaria v. C.A., 487 SCRA 571 [2006] CASE DECISION = Anino v. NLRC, 290 SCRA 489 [1998] & EDI Staff Builders Intemational Inc. v. Magsino, 359 SCRA 212 [2001] MANAGEMENT FUNCTION Recognition “ Gustillo V. Wyeth Phils. Inc., 440 SCRA 67 [2004] = Philcom Employees Union v. Phil Global Communications, 495 SCRA 214 [2006] Limitations * DOLE Phits. Inc. v. Pawis, 395 SCRA 112 [2003] = Valiao v. Court of Appeals, 435 SCRA 543 [2004]1.09. COMPROMISE AND WAIVER - ART. 233; Arts. 2028, 2036 Acufia v. C.A., 489 SCRA 658 [2006] Oriental Shio Management Co., Inc. v. C.A., 480 SCRA 100 [2008] Periquet v. NLRC, 186 SCRA 724 [1990] EMCO Plywood Comp. v. Abelgas, 427 SCRA 496 [2004] Sarocam v. Interorient Maritime Ent, Inc., 493 SCRA 502 [2006 a4ga'4 Section 2, Labor and The Constitution TATUTORY REFERENCE: - 1935, 1973 and 1987 CONSTITUTIONS HISTORICAL BACKGROUND/RATIONALE, = Antamoc Golafields Mining Co. v. CIR, 70 Phil. 340 [1940] 2.02 NATURE OF PROVISION == Phil. Aiines, Inc. v. Santos, 218 SCRA 415 [1993] 2.03 1987 CONSTITUTION A. Labor Sector- Characterized - Art. Il, Sec. 18 Bernas, pp. 92-95 B. Protection of Labor - Guarantees - Art. Xill, Sec. 3. Compare: 1935 Constitution — Art. XIV, Sec. 3; 1973 Constitution - Art Il, Sec. 9 and 1987 Constitution, Art. XIII, Secs. 1, 3; Art. Il, Secs. 10, 18 Joaquin A. Bernas, S.J. The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, pp. 1194-1197 C. Social Justice — Art. Il, Sec. 10; 1973 Constitution; Art. Il, Sec. 5: 4935 Constitution; 1987 Constitution, Art. XIll, SEcs. 1-2, Definition - Social Justice = Calalang v. Williams, 70 Phil. 726 (1940) Limits of Use & Phil. Long Distance Telephone Co. v. NLRC, 164 SCRA 671 [1988] © Agabon v. NLRC, 442 SCRA 573 [2004]CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND LABOR LAW Management and the Constitution > Dayan v. Bayer of the Phil. Islands, 369 SCRA 712 [2001] = Manila Electric Company v. Quisumbing, 302 SCRA 173 [1989] Agabon v. NLRC, 442 SCRA 573 [2004] ‘Sarocam v. Interorient Maritime Ent., Inc., 493 SCRA 502 [2006] Labor as Property = Asuncion v. NLRC, 362 SCRA 56 [2001] © Executive Secretary v. Court of Appeals, 429 SCRA 81 [2004] Due Process Requirements = Ang Tibay v. CIR, 59 Phil., 635 [1940] = Air Manila, Inc. v, Balatbat, 38 SCRA 489 [1971] = Century Textile Mills, Inc. v. NLRC, 161 SCRA 528 [1989] Liberty of Contract and State Interference & Leyte Land Transportation Co. v. Leyte Farmers and Workers Union, 80 Phil, 842 [1948] & Victoriano v. Elizalde Rope Workers Union, 89 SCRA 64 [1874] Welfare State & Alalayan v. National Power Corporation, 24 SCRA 172 [1968] Lalssez-faire ® Employees Confederation of the Phils. v. National Weges and Productivity Commission, 201 SCRA 759 [1991] Participation In Decision Making Process Philippines Airlines, Inc. v. NLRC, 225 SCRA 301 [1993] Section 3, Labor and The Civil Code STATUTORY REFERENCE: Civil Code of the Philippines, RA. No, 386 as amended.3.01. ROLE OF LAW - ART. 1700, NEW CIVIL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES Labor Contracts =" Brew Master Intemational, Inc. v. NAFLU, 271 SCRA 275 [1997] = Philippine Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. NLRC, 272 SCRA 596 [1997] Read: Tolentino, Commentaries and Jurisprudence on the Civil Code of the Philippines, Vol. 5, pp. 277-278 3.02. EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE STANDARD OF CONDUCT - ART. 1701, NEW CIVIL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES Fair Treatment ® General Bank and Trust Co. v. Court of Appeals, 135 SCRA 569 [1985] © Star Paper Corp. v. Simbol, 487 SCRA 228 [2006] Mutual Obligation © Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. Lariosa, 148 SCRA 187 [1987] © Star Paper Corp. v. Simbol, 487 SCRA 228 [2006] Law Compliance = Sarmiento v. Tuico, 182 SCRA 676 [1988] Empl ence and Compliance Empl rders = PCIB v. Jacinto, 196 SCRA 697 [1991] ® GTE Directories Corp. v. Sanchez, 197 SCRA 452 [1998] © Gustilo v. Wyeth Phifs., Inc., 440 SCRA 67 [2004] Employer Obligation © Lagniton v. NLRC, 218 SCRA 456 [1993] = Maneja v. NLRC, 280 SCRA 603 [1998] = Special Stee! Products. v. Villareal, 434 SCRA 19 [2004] Section 4, Labor and International Covenants (Labor Standards and Welfare Law) 4.01. UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS — ARTS. 3, 7, 17, 22, 23, 24, 2502. INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS - PART Ill, ARTS. 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 4.03. INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL, RIGHTS - PART II, ART. 8 4.04. CONVENTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL LABOR ORGANIZATIONS (ILO) International Conventions * Intemational School Alliance of Educators v. Quisumbing, 333 SCRA 13 [2000] Section 5. The Labor Code Of the Philippines. §.01 DECREE TITLE -1 5.02 EFFECTIVITY -2 5.03 POLICY DECLARATION - 3 5.04 APPLICABILITY — 6,276; ART. IX, B. Sec. 2 (1), CONSTITUTION Domestic and Overseas Workers “= DMA Shipping Phils., Inc. v. Cabillar, 452 SCRA 551 [2005] Requisite Relationshi = Uy, Buenao, 484 SCRA 628 [2006] Test = GOCC * Cabrera v. NLRC, 198 SCRA 573 [1991] * Gamogamo v. PNOC Shipping and Transport Corp., 381 SCRA 742 = Font Railway Transit Authority v. Venus, 485 SCRA 361 [2008] Intemational Agencies = Ebro Ill v. NLRC, 261 SCRA 399 [1896] School Teachers = National Mines and Alfied Workers Union v. San Ildefonso College, etc., 299 SCRA 24 [1998]5.08 = Chiang Kaishek College v. Court of Appeals, 437 SCRA 171 [2004] Religious Corporations ~ Austria v. NLRC, 312 SCRA 410 [1999] Managerial Employees » Pefaranda v. Baganga Plywood Corp., 489 SCRA 94 [2006] RULE MAKING POWER -5 Limitation “Rule Making Power = CBTC Employees Union v. Clave, 141 SCRA 9 [1986] > Sonza v. ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp., 431 SCRA 583 [2004] Rizal Empire Insurance Group v. NLRC, 150 SCRA 665 [1987] LAW INTERPRETATION - 4; ART, 1702, NEW CIVIL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES Read: Tolentino, Commentaries and Jurisprudence on the Civil Code of he Philippines, Vol. 5, p. 279 Liberal Construction « Duncan Association, etc. v. Glaxo Wellcome, 438 SCRA 343 [2004] = Salinas v, NLRC, 319 SCRA 54 [1999] In favor Labor - Rationale w Abella v. NLRC, 152 SCRA 140 (1987) “© Asian Transmission Corp., v. Court of Appeals, 425 SCRA 478 (2004) Doubt * Clemente v. GSIS, 152 SCRA 500 [1987] + Acufia v. C.A., 489 SCRA 658 [2006] No Doubt © Bonifacio v. GSIS, 146 SCRA 276 [1986]‘Sweeping Interpretation = Bravo v. Employees Compensation Commission, 143 SCRA 101 (1986) Factual Considerations and Rationality = Phil. Airlines, Inc. v. NLRC, 201 SCRA 687 [1991] Equity and Moral Consideration > Manning Intemational Corp. v. NLRC, 195 SCRA 155 [1991] Fairness = Reliance Surety and Insurance Co., Inc. v. NLRC, 193 SCRA 365 [1991] Balancing Conflicting Claims & Phil. Airlines, Inc. v. NLRC, 201 SCRA 687 (1992) “© Duncan Association, etc. v. Glaxo Wellcome Phils.,Inc., 438 SCRA 343 (2004) Section 6. Work Relationship STATUTORY REFERENCE - Arts 106, Par. 4, 107, 109 6.01 A. WORK RELATIONSHIP Definitions: Employer and Employee See any Labor or Law Dictionary ~ 97 (a), (b), (c); 187 (f(g); 212 (e), f). Policy Instruction No. 40, (1978) ~ Employment in Broadcast Industry Employee © United Pepsi-Cola Supervisory Union (UPSU) v. Laguesma, 288 SCRA 15 [1998] Employer-Employee Relationship Factual Test Sonza v. ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp., 431 SCRA 583 [2004]+ Asiatic Development Corp. v. Brogada, 495 SCRA 166 (2006) Vilavilla v. C:A., 212 SCRA 488 [1992] tablis! @& Miguel v. JCT Group, Inc., 453 SCRA 529 [2005] ’ Wack-Wack Golf and Country Club v. NLRC, 458 SCRA 280 (2008) Factors & Philppine Global Communications, Inc. v. De Vera, 459 SCRA 260 2005} » Sonza v, ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp., 431 SCRA @ Jardin, etc, v. NLRC, 326 SCRA 299 [2001] = Manila Golf, ete. v. IAC, 237 SCRA 207 [1994] 583 [2004] Control Test UERMMMC ~ R.D.U. v. Laguesma, cited in Felix v. Buenaseda, 240 SCRA 139 [1996] Transport Corp. v. Ejandra, 428 SCRA 725 (2004) 431 SCRA 583 (2004) Sonza v. ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp... Insular Life v. NLRC, 179 SCRA 459 (1989) 481 SCRA 364 (2006) Almirez v. Infinite Corp. Technology Corp. v Economic Test @ Sevilla v. Court of Appeals, 160 SCRA 171 [1988] Agreement @ Insular Life Assurance Co. Ltd. v. NLRC, 287 SCRA 476 [1998] @ Chavez v. NLRC, 448 SCRA 478 [2005] @ San Miguel Corp. v. Abella, 461 SCRA 392 [2005] @ Lopez v. Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System, 462 SCRA 428 [2005] ., 481 SCRA 364 [2006]6.02. x Domasig v. NLRC, 261 SCRA 779 (1996] « Abante v. Lamadrid etc., 430 SCRA 368 [2004] Denial @ R._ Transport Corp. v. Ejandra, 428 SCRA 725 [2004] INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AND LABOR CONTRACTOR ONLY — 106-107; 109; DOLE ORDER No. 18-02, SERIES OF 2002 - Azucena, Essentials of Labor Law, pp. 634-645 A Independent Contractor Management Function ~ Determination Need ~ Manila Electric Co. v. Quisumbing, 302 SCRA 173 [1999] Requirements — Independent Contractor @ Manila Electric Co., v. Benamira, 463 SCRA 331 [2005] San Miguel Corp. v. Abella, 461 SCRA 392 [2005 = Big AA Manufacturer v. Antonio, 484 SCRA 33 [2006] Desirable — Unnecessary «© Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils., Inc. v. NLRC, 307 SCRA 131 [1999] Employer-EmployeeSection 7. Employee Classification STATUTORY REFERENCE 7.02. EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION — 294-2295, RE Labor Gootractor Only Requisites and Prohibition © Vinoya v. NLRC, 324 SCRA 469 (2000) rt RA 53 [2004] Manila Water Co. Inc, v. Pena. 434 » Grandspan Development Corp. v. Bemarda 470 SCRA 461 (2005) Effect of Findina Phil, Airtines, a $an Miguo! Corp. v. SCRA 579 [2003] [1998] Inc. v. NLRC, 298 SCRA 214 De Mar gs, inc., 405 MAERG Integrated Servict ‘Art 204; Book VI, Rule 4, Sec, 5, Ommnibt COVERAGE — 292 COGNITION Recoanition and Types = Philippine Federatior 72 [1998] General Milling Corp, 434 SCRA 159 [2004] @ Pangitinan v. = De Leon v. NLRC, Employer Determination 176 SCRA 615 [1989] us Rules n of Credit Gooperatives, inc. v. NLRC, 300 SCRA © San Migue! Corporation v. NLRC, 287 SCRA 277 (1998) Co, Inc. v, NLRC, 168 SCRA 497 Tabas v. Califomia Manufacturing 2) PAR. 295 LAST7.04. Nature. of Werk sain v, National Crganiratign @ic a03 SORA 100 (2005) jonda Fatima v. National Federation of Sugarcane Workers Food Soneval Trade, 396 SCRA 518 {2003} og v. NLRC, 385 SCRA 307 (2002) SCRA 96 [2008] iieurn Shipping Ltd, v. NLRC, 491 Gunpers United ofc, ¥. NLRC, 494 SCRA 86 (2000) es Pentagon Intemational Shipping, inc, v. Adelanter, 435 SCRA 34: 4 Sewerage System, 462 SCRA (2008) Lope v. Metropolitan Watenvonks and 428 [2005] Hiring Extend Period + Audion Electric Co. ine. v. NLRC. 308 SCRA 340 [1999] « Bela Electric Corp. v. NLRC, 182 SCRA 384 [1990] > Universal Robina Corp. v. Catapang, 473 SCRA 189 {2005} Length of Time # Maraguinot v. NLRC, 284 SCRA 539 (1998) * Abesco Construction and Development Corp. v. Ramirez, 487 SCRA 9 [2006] PROJECT EMPLOYEES - 294, 16" PAR Defined w ALU-TUGP v. NLRC, 234 SCRA 678 [1994] @ Kiamco v. NLRC, 309 SCRA 424 [1999] Project Employees7.05. Employer Ol 76 SCRA 218 [1989] + AM, Oreta and Co., Inc. v. NLRC, 4 v. NLRC, 283 SCRA 139 [1987] uits, Ine, 494 SCRA 486 [2006] ‘Specific Period « Purefoods Corp. a Labayog v. MY. San Bise. Continous Rehiring [2004] « Chua v, Court of Appeals, 440 SCRA 121 w CE, Construction Corp. v. Cioco, 437 SGRA 648 [2004] Workpool Employees: or Maraguinot v. NLRC, 284 SCRA 539 [1998] «© J.&D.0. Aguilar Corp. v. NLRE, 269 SCRA 596 [1997] Z © AAbesco Construction and Development Corp. v. Ramirez, 487 SCRA 9 12008) Length of Service * Palomares v. NLRC, 277 SCRA 439 [1997] * Filipinas Pre-Fabricated Building Systems, Inc 820 (2005) v. Puente, 453 SCRA CASUAL EMPLOYEES — 295 2"° PAR Nature of Work = AM, Oreta and Co., inc. v. NLRC, 176 SCRA 218 [1989] One Year Senvice rly v. Driton, 185 SCRA 190 [1 /. Court of Appeals,= Brent School v. Zarnore, 191 SCRA 702 (1890) Groin v. NLRG, 193 SCRA.410 [1004] ros ¥. NLRC, 385 SCRA 306 [2002] watace * viernes v. NLAC, 400 SCRA 697 [2003] itis Somiconductors etc v Fadkiquolo, 427 SCRA 400 [2004] Pangiinan v. General Miling Garp, 434 SCRA 160 [2004] nployers Seasonal + Magcalan v. NLRC, 260 SCRA 453 [1907] = Phi Tobacco ele. v. NLRC, 300 SCRA 37 [1998] SCRA 277 [1998] + San Miguel Corp. v. NLRC, 207 Manda Hotel v. CIR, 9 SCRA 184 (2003) Industrial ote. v. CIR, 165 SCRA 642 [2000] Hacienda Bing v, Cuenca, 458 SCRA 400 (2005) Poseidon Fishing v. NLRC, 482 SCRA 717 {2006} 4444 Section 8. Probationary Employee STATUTORY REFERENCE: - Probationary Emp sentence, Book VI, Rule 1, Sec. 6, Omnibus Rules 5, 61, 2° SENTENCE BOOK VI, joyees — 295; 61, 2 8.01. PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEES — 29 RULE 1, Sec. 6, OMNIBUS RULES + Intemational Catholic Migration Commission v. NLRC, 169 SCRA 508 [1989] [ + Phil Federation of Credit Cooperatives, Inc. v. NLRC, 300 SCRA 72 #998) Purpose [1884] NLRC, 169 SCRA 5087 Escompize v; University of Baguio, 308 SCRA 497 [1998) Employer Right Set Period/Obiaation & Grend Motors Corp. v. MOLE, 130 SCRA 436 [1984] = Grom Express Placement Philppines v. NLRC. 273 SCRA 256 [1997] + Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Chryster Phils. Labor Union, 433 SCRA 206 (2004) Duration/Exception @ Buiserv Leogardo, 131 SCRA 151 [1984] «Intemational Catholic Migration Commission v. [1989] Manila v. NLRC, 226 SCRA 417 [1983] “ Holiday inn a Bemardo v. NLRC. 310 SCRA 186 [1999] o Mitsubishi Motors Comp. v. Chrysler ete,, 433 SCRA 206 (2004) & Alcira v. NLRC, 431 SCRA 508 [2004] NLRC, 169 SCRA 508 Criteria Regularization = Alcira v. NLRC, 431 SCRA 508 [2004] Extension of Contract Mariwasa Manufactunng inc. v. Leogardo, 169 SCRA 485 (1989) Absorbed Employees * Cebu Stevedoring Co. Inc. v. Regional Director, 168 SCRA 315 (1988) Double Probation * APrime Security Services, inc. v. NLRC, 322 SCRA 283 [2000] NLRC, 169 SCRA 508 , 273 SCRA 256Rule Private School Teachers * Chiang Kai Shok College v. Court of Appeals, 437 SCRA 171 [2004] * La Consolacion Colfege v. NLRC, 368 SCRA 226 [2001]PART TWO - LABOR STANDARDS LAW Pumose © Mariveles Shipyard Corp, v. Court of Appeals, 415 SCRA 573 [2003] Section 1, Employmont Policy 1.01, PRE-EMPLOYMENT POLICY ~ STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES = 12 Section 2, Recruitment and Placement of Workers STATUTORY REFERENCE: Art. 1-29; Book J, Rutes III-VIll, Omaibus Rules, Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act of 1995 (R.A. No. 8042) R.A, Mo, 6759 (2000) ~ mployment Service Office Act of 1989 ~ Secs. 2- 8 Guidelines on Advertisement fer Job Vacancies. Memorandum Circular #16 (1988). DOLE ‘Guidelines on Application for Authority to Conduct Provincial Recruitment andlor ‘Memorandum Circular No. 87 (1989), DOLE | Entities, Non-Governmental ions, DOLE Order No. 2 (2001) ns and Procedures for the s. DOLE Circular No 01-91-(1981) E,0..No, 857 -_Governing the Remittance to the Philippines. of Foreign nf ings of Filipino. Kers Abre and fc ther Pi SOverseas Employment {Articlo 19-24) Eastem Shipping Lines v. POEA, Minister of Labor and Employment. Officer, Abdul Basar and Kathleen D, Saco, 166 SCRA 533 Hearir [1988] + PHILSA Intemational Plecement v, Sec. of Labor, 356 SCRA 174 (2001) Pacific Asia Overseas Shipping Corp. v. NLRC, 161 SCRA 122 (1988) Millares and Lagda v. NLRC, 385 SCRA 306 [2002] Tierra International Corporation v. NLRC, 256 SCRA 36 [1996] Marsrnan Manning Agency v. NLRC, 313 SCRA 88 (19991 Athenna intemational Manpower Services, Inc. v, Villanos, 456 SCRA 313 [2005] Norse Management Corp. v. National Seamen Board, 217 SCRA 488 NED Intemational Manning Agents v. NLRC, ef al, 284 SCRA 239 (1998) + Philippine Interna! Ve aas al Shipping Corp. v. NLRC, 136 SCRA 605 [1985] nal Seamen Board Article 20: Ni ” Vinien Shipping and Marine Services v, NLRC, 115 SCRA 347, 125 SCRA 577 [1983] 2 Chavez v. Bonto-Perez Rayala, et al 242 SCRA 73 [1995] Regulations of Recruitment and Placomont Activities {Article 25-39) 2 Eastem Assurance and Surety Corp. v. Sec. of Labor, 181 SCRA 110 * ae v. Achacoso and Marquez, 183 SCRA [1990] Article 34; Prohibited Practices ore Shipp ining Corp., 177 SCRA 5132.04 2.05. 2.06, ALLOWED ENTITIES A General Rule - 16, 18, 25, 12(f) Allowed Entities = 13(c), (e) a. Private ~ 13(c) (e) b. Public - 12(f), 14g) 8 PROHIBITED ENTITY - 16, 18,26 TECHNIQUES OF REGULATION - 25-39 License * People v. Bull-E, 404 SCRA 105 [2003] ILLEGAL RECRUITMENT ~ 38, 34, Sec. 6, R.A. No. 8042 [1995] © People v. Oralono, 335 SCRA 331 2000) People v. Sagayaga, 423 SCRA 468 [2004] Poople v. Baytic, 398 SCRA 18 (2003) Large Scale + People v. Buli-E, 404 SCRA 105 [2003] © People v. Dujua, 422 SCRA 169 [2004} & Peaple v. Reyes, 242 SCRA 264 [1995} Referrals & People v, Meris, 329 SCRA 33 (2000) & People v. Fortuna, 395 SCRA 354 [2003]x Executive Secretary v. Court of Appeals, 429 SCRA 81 [2004] 208. LIABILITY OF AGENCY * G&M (Phil) inc. v. Batomalaque, 461 SCRA 111 [2005] 2.09. MIGRANT WORKERS ACT - RA. No. 8042, Secs, 2. 4; 6; and 10 @ Phil, Employ Services, ete. v. Paranio. 427 SCRA 732 [2004] = Placewell Int, Services, Corp.. v. Camote, 492 SCRA 761 (2008) Section 3. Alien Employment STATUTORY REFERENCE: Arts, 40-42: Revised Guidelines for Issuances of Employment Permit - 1988 3.01, COVERAGE Non-Resident Alien a Almodiel v. NLRC, 223 SCRA 341 [1993] 3.02. TECHNIQUE REGULATION - EMPLOYMENT PERMIT - 40-42; ART. XIt SEC. 12, CONSTITUTION He); 4, 10; 40 R.A. No. 7918 — Amending Omnibus Investment: Sec. 39(g) Authority Employment Permit - ssuance © General Milling Corp. v. Torres, 198 SCRA 215 [1991] s Code of 1987 — lucation and Skills faining Systems Act (RA. No. 7277)4.01 A 402 POLICY OBJECTIVES — Secs, 2-3, R.A. No. 7796 APPRENTICE APPRENTICE Defined — 4G) (R.A. No. 7798) A B. _Apptenticeable Occupation — 4(m), (RA. No. 7798) C. Qualification — Sec, 12, R.A. No. 7610, as amended by RA. No. 7658 D. Allowed Employment Requirement Program Approval «© Nitto Enterprises v. NLRC, 248 SCRA 654 [1995] —, Terms and Conditions of Employment — 61, 72 F. Costs = 71 6 Enforcement - 65, 68, 67 LEARNERS LEARNERS Defined - 4 (R.A, No. 7796) A B Allowed Employment — 75(b) C. Terms and Conditions of Employment — 75, 76 HANDICAPPED WORKERS HANDICAPPED WORKER - R.A. No. 7277 (1992, MAGNA CARTA FOR. " DISABLED PERSONS) fined — 4(a), (b), (c), (d), 1-8 (R.A. No. 7277) Hlowed | 5 77) 1,14, li, OmnibusRules Implementing the Labor Code HOURS REGULATION Rationale and, Enforcement 2 Manila Terminal Co. Inc, v. CIR, 91 Phil, 626 [1952] 5.02, COVERAGE ~ 82-200 Rationale Exemption — Managerial Employees « Peharanda v, Baganga Plywood Corp.. 489 SCRA 94 [2006] » Asia Pacific Christening, Ino. v, Farolan, 393 SCRA 454 [2004] © National Waterworks and Sewerage Authonty v, NAWASA Consolidated Unions, 11 SCRA 766 [1965] # Samson v. NLRC, 330 SCRA 460 [2000] Tests - Field Personne! 2 Union of Filipino Employees v. Vivar, 205 SCRA 200 [1 992] Galezar v. NLRC, 256 SCRA 273 [1996] = Merdicar Fishing Corp. v. NLRC, 207 SCRA 440 [1998] + Auto Bus Transport Systems, inc. v. Bautista, 458 SCRA 878 (2000) Rationale Exemption — Piece Worker & Red V Coconut Products Lid, v. CIR, 17 SCRA 553 [1966] 5.03. NORMAL HOURS OF WORK - 83 5.04. HOURS WORKED ~ 84waning Tine * Arca v. NLRG, 170 SCRA 776 [1989] Travel Time 2 Rada v. NLRC, 208 SCRA 69 (1992) Entry Time Cards = Prangan v. NLRC, 289 SCRA 142 (1998) } = Nicario v. NLRC, 295 SCRA 619 [1998] Aklan Electric Coop, inc. v. NLRG, 323 SCRA 258 [2000] MEAL PERIOD - 85 Meal Tine - Free Time = Pan-American Airways v. Pan-American Employees Association, 1 6.05. SCRA 527 [1961] = Phil. Airlines, Inc. v. NLRC, 302 SCRA 582 [1999] WERTIME WORK AND OFFSETTING PROHIBITION - 87-90 Definition and Rationale = Overtime Pay Philippine National Bank v. Philippine National Bank Employees Association, 115 SCRA 507 [1982] © Caltex Reguiar Employees, etc. v. Caltex (Phils.) Inc., 247 SCRA 388 $06. [1995] = Manila Terminal Co., Ine. v. CIR, 91 Phil. 625 {1952} No Computation Formula Basic Contract = Manila Terminal Co., Inc. v. CIR, 91 Phil. 625 [1952]+ Villory. NLRC. 331 SCRA 688 [2000] Employer Obliaatios © Social Security System v. Court of Appeals, 348 SCRA ¥ (20001 507 NIGHT WORK- 86 Rationale Prohibition + Shel Oi! Co. of the Philippines, Lid, v. National Labor union. BY F 315 (1948) i Section 6, Cenditions of Employment ~ Weekly Rest Periods iT REFERENCE: - Arts, 91-03; Book itl, Rule II], Omnibus Rules implementing the Labor Code 6.01. Rationale = Manila Electric Co, v. Public Utiities Employees Assn. 79 Phil, 409 [1947) 6.02, COVERAGE - 62, 91 (a) 6.03. SCHEDULING OF REST DAY - 91(b) 6.04, COMPULSORY WORK AND COMPENSATION - 92 Section 7. Conditions of Employment - Holidays STATUTORY REFERENCE: - Arts. 94-95, Exec. Order No. 203, (1984); Book Ii, Rule IV, Omnibus Rules 7.01, COVERAGE - 94{a) Coverage and Purpose © task 10 (t09) on uaioses and Workers Union v. Bacungan,Phiipnines. P.O. No. 1083 (1977) = Ait. 169 7.03. HOLIDAY PAY - 94 ity Private Sohoot 2 Jose Rizal Coliege v. NLRC, 188 SCRA 27 [1987] Divisor as Fa + Union of Filipro Employees v. Vivar, 205 SCRA 200 [1921] « Transasia Phils. Employer Assn. v. NLRC, 320 SCRA $47 [1982] ‘Computation « Agga v. NLRC, 298 SCRA 285 (1898) Sunday °- Wellington Investment inc. v. Trajano, 245 SCRA 561 [1895] Proof of Payment ® Building Care Corp. v. NLRC, 268 SCRA 666 [1998] Section 8. Conditions of Employment - Leaves SERVICE INCENTIVE LEAVE AL¥ Auto Bus Transport Systems, Inc. v, Bautista, a58 SCRA 678 {2008} PATERNITY LEAVE - Paternity Leave Act of 1996 (R.A. No. 8187 and Implomenting Rules) MATERNITY LEAVE - Sec. 14-A (R.A. No. 8282) VACATION AND SICK LEAVE nia — Soot R.A. No, 8972 — An Act Providing Fer Benefits... To Solo P: 26.8 Section 9. Wages A. Wages - In General STATUTORY REFERENCE: - Arts. 97-119; Book lll, Rules Vil-Vill, Omnibus Rules 9.01. COVERAGE - 97 (b) (c)(e); 98 Government Agency * Phil, Fisheries Development Authonity v. NLRC, 213 SCRA 621 [1912] 9.02. WAGE - 97(F); CONSTITUTION, ART. Ill Defined * Chavez v. NLRC, 448 SCRA 478 (2005) * Mayon Hotel and Restaurants v. Adana, 458 SCRA 609 [2005]. Fair Day Pay * Aklan Electric Cooperative., line. v. NLRC, 323 SCRA 258 {2000} Quisumbing, 333 SCRA ) Supervisors Union, 468 SCRA 148 (2004)Valuation of Eacilitic Supplements - DOLE Order No. 4 (1988) - Meals and Other Facitities * States Marine Corporation v. Cebu Seamen's Association inc,, 7 SCRA 204 [1963] * Milares v. NLRC, 205 SCRA 500 [1999} Tes * Ace Navigation Co. Inc. v. C.A., 338 SCRA 70 (2000) Gash Wage/Commissions & Songeo v. NLRC, 183 SCRA 610 [1990] @ iran v. NLRC, 289 SCRA 433 (1998) Wages and Salary & Gaa v. Court of Appeals, 140 SCRA 304 [1985] @& Equitable Banking Corp. v. Sadac, 490 SCRA 380 [2008] Gratuity and Wages. = Plastic Town Center Com. v. NLRC, 172 SCRA 580 [1989] 13" Month Pay a Agabon v. NLRC, 442 SCRA 573 [2004] B. Payment of Wages STATUTORY REFERENCE: - Arts. 102-104; Sec. 7, R.A. No. 6727 9.03. FORM - 102; Payment of Salary Thru ATM (DOLE 1998)9.08. 9.07. 9.08. 9.09. Chaves v. NLRC, 448 SCRA 478 [2005] © Phi! Global Communications, Inc. v. De Vero, 459 SCRA 260 [2005] Gash Weaes: « Congson v. NLRO, 243 SCRA 260 [1959] Payroll Entries w Karasia, Inc. v. Corano, 437 SCRA 184 [2004] TIME PAYMENT - 103 PLACE PAYMENT - 104 See: Labor Advisory on Payment of Salaries Thru Automated Teller Machine (ATM) DIRECT PAYMENT - 105 CONTRACTOR ~ SUB CONTRACTOR — 108-109 PROHIBITION REGARDING WAGES NON-INTERREFERENCE — DISPOSAL WAGES — 112 WAGE DEDUCTION = 113, 117 Wage Deduction * Radio Communications of the Phils. Inc. v. Sec, of Labor, 169 SCRA 38 [1989] «@ Apodaca y. NLRC, 172 SCRA 442 [1989] Check-off~ 113 (b)WITHHOLDING OF WAGES - 118; RECORD KEEPING = 119 GamishmenvAttachmens = Speckal Stee! Comp. v. Vilarpal, 434 SCRA 19 [2004] Paciie Customs Brokerage, ine. v. inter-isiand Dockmen ad Labor Union, 89 Phil. 722 [1951] GAA ¥. Court of Appeals, 140 SCRA 304 (1985) i Keeping Enterprises v. Toso, 181 SCRA 388 [1990] * South Motor Other Forms of Remuneration SERVICE CHARGES — 96, BOOK III, RULE VI, OMNIBUS RULES Service Charges = Maranaw Hotels ete. v, NLRC, 303 SCRA 840 [1999] Tips x Ace Navigation Co., Ine. v. Court of Appeals, 338 SCRA 70 [2000] THIRTEENTH MONTH PAY (PRES. DECREE NO. 851) Coverage - Revised Guidelines on the Implementation of 13" Month Pay Law, 16 November 1987 — Secs. 1-8; P.D. No. 851 werage # Ultra Villa Food Haus v. Geniston, 309 SCRA 17 [1999) = Petroleum Shipping Ltd., v. NLRC, 491 SCRA 35 [2006) 1995) 463 SCRA 136 [2005]Househoipers © Ultra Villa Food Haus v. Genision, 309 SCRA 17 [1999] Government Employees * Attiance of Govemment Workers v. NLRC, 124 SCRA 1 (1895) Terminated Employees * Achilles Manufacturing Corp. v. NLRC, 244 SCRA 750 [1995] Rationale — P, D. No, 851 — Whereas Clauses and Limitations Basic Wage / Commissions ” Bole Takeda v, Dela Sema, 228 SCRA 329 [1993] * Phil, Duplicators Inc. v. NLRC, 241 SCRA 380 [1995] Iran v, NLRC, 289 SCRA 433 (1988) ck 2» Honda Phils. Inc. v. Samahan ng Maleyang Manggagawa sa Honda, 460 SCRA 185 [2005] Substitute Payment © Framanlis Farms, fac. v. MOLE, 171 SCRA 87 [1989] 14" Menth Pay * Kamaya Port Hotel v. NLRC, 177 SCRA 160 [1989} Diminution @ Davao Fruits Corp. v, Associated Labor Unions, 225 SCRA 562 [1993] 9.14. BONUS Management Function Business information Systems and Services, inc. v. NLRC, 221 SCRA Siar ion C ut of f 425 SCRA 478 (2004)9.15 9.16. 9.17. ” diverican Wire and Cable Daily Reted Empioyees Union v. American Wire and Cable Ca, the, 487 SCRA 008] Luzon Stevedoring Com. v. Cire 18 SCRA G00 [1965] [berators Steamship Co., ine. v. CIA. 23 SCRA 1108 11968) Marcos v. NERC, 248 SCRA 146 [1995] pralbpina National Construction Carp, v. NLRC; 207 SCRA 218 {1989} Producers Bank of the Phils, v. NURG, 365 SCRA 489 [2001] (hilppine Duplicators inc. v NLRC, 241 SCRA 380 (1995) * Mania Electric Cov. Quisumbing, 302 SCRA 173 [1999] lank of the Phils, v. NLRC. 55 SCRA 489 [2001] Producers Be © Phil Applionce Corp, v. Court of Appeals, 430 SCRA $25 (2004) PRODUCTIVITY INCENTIVES ACT OF 1990 -R. A. No. 6971 Ttagg Wage Recovory, Liabilities and Worker Preference LABILITY OF EMPLOYER AND OTHER PARTIES: Employer, Independent Contractor and Sub-Contractor and Labor Only Contracting 106-109 Liabilities © Sentine! Security Agency Inc. v, NLRC, 298 SCRA 562 [1998] * Lapanday Agricultural Development Corporation v. Court of Appeals, 324 SCRA 39 (2000) * OSM Shipping Phils. Inc. v. NLRC, 398 SCRA 606 [2003] * Manila Electric Co, v. Banamira, 463 SCRA 331 [2005] WORKER PREFERENCE — BANKRUPTCY ~ 110; NEW CIVIL CODE, 1707, 2241, 2242, 2244 Civil Code — Labor Code * Republic v. Peralta, 150 SCRA 37 [1987] * Phil. Export etc. v. Court of Appeals, 251 SCRA 354 {1995} © Baranga v. Asset Privatization Trust, 473 SCRA 690 (2005)F STATUTOR! RA. No. 672 * Placoweil intemational, ato, y, Camoto, 492 SCRA 761 12006) Minimum Wages. N REFERENCE ANS, 126-127; Book Wi, Rule IX, Omnibus Rules: 9.19. WAGES AND THE CONSTITUTION — ART. Xt, SEC. 3 9.20. 9.21, 9.22 Minimum Wages = Atok Big Wedge Mining Co. Ine. v. Atok Big Wedge Mutual Bonofit Association, 92 Phil. 755 (1953] Beneficiaries © People v. Gatchalian, 104 Phil. 664 [1959] Effect Inability Pay = Phil. Apparel Workers Union v. NLRC, 106 SCRA 444 (1981) AGENCIES FOR WAGE FIXING MACHINERY A. _ National Wages and Productivity Commission — 120, 121 and 126 B. Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Board - 122, 126 Functions ® Nasipit Lumber Co. v. NLRC, 289 SCRA 339 [2003] AREA MINIMUM WAGES AND CRITERIA — 124 WAGE OF ORDER — 123-124 Methods of Fixing * Employers Confederation of the Phil. V. National Wages and Productivity Commission, 201 SCRA 759 [1991] Labor, 284 SCRA 150© Lambo v NLRC. 317 ScRAA20 (1 = Puip-ote « MLRG, 278 SERA aos fd) Wage Distortion National Federation of Labor v. NLRC, 234 SCRA 314 [1994] Pribonkers Assn. v, Prudential Bank and Co, 302 SGRA 74 (1998) = Associated Labor Union v. NLRC, 258 SCRA 395 [1994] © Bankerd Employees Union ete v. NLRC, 423 SCRA 148 [2004] 9.23. EFFECT ON BENEFITS - 100 = Prubeokers Assn. v, Prudential Bank and Co., 302 SCRA 74 (1999) Omnibus Rules Section 10 = Women Workers A, No, 8282 STATUTORY REFERENCE — Arts. 130-138, Book Ill, Rute All, Implementing Labor Code: R.A No. 7877; R.A. No. 8184; and R Women Workers = Phil. Telegraph and Telephone Co,, v. NLRC, 272 SCRA 696 [1997] 40.02, COVERAGE - BOOK Ill, RULE Xill, SEC. 1, OMNIBUS RULES 10.03. PROHIBITED ACTS 7) Night Work and Exception — 130-131 Discrimination — 133 2) 3) Marriage - 134 4) General - 135 10.04. FACILITIES — 130, 132 10.05. SPECIAL CLASSIFICATION SPECIAL WOMEN WORKERS — 136 10.06. MATERNITY LEAVE — SEE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT OF 1997, Sec. 14- A AND PATERNITY LEAVE ACT OF 1996, R.A. NO. 8187 _ 10.07. SEXUAL HARASSMENT - R.A, 7877 [199 =3, 3(b) (1-4)BUTY EMPLOYER — 4 LIABILITY EMPLOYER — REMEDIES — 6.7 : © Libres v. NLRC, 307 SCRA 675 [1999] * Phil, Aclous Automative United Corp. v. NURG, 331 SCRA 237 [2000] mended by RA. Section 11. Minors RA, No. 7610 STATUTORY REFERENCE: Ans, 137-138; RA, No. 7610 a3 a No. 7658. Special Protection of Children Against Child Abuse, @tc. as Amended by RA. 7658 11.01. MINORS AND THE CONSTITUTION — ART. Il, SEC. 13 11.02 LAW- ART. Vil, WORKING CHILDREN, RA, No. 7610, AS AMENDED BY RA. NO. 7658 — Secs. 2, 3, 12-16 11.03 DISCRIMINATION - 138 Section 12. Househelpers 40361 Domestic Workers Act “152: Book Ill, Rute Xtll, Omnibus STATUTORY REFERENCE: RA 3 Amended; and Minimum “Kasambahay Law”, 18 Jan. 2043; Arts. 141 Rules; Civil Code of the Philippines , RA. No. 386 a Wage of Househelpers, R.A. 7655 12.01. COVERAGE -139 12.02, HOUSEHELPERS -139 42.03 NON-HOUSEHOLD WORK ASSIGNMENT -143 # Barcenas v. NLRC, 187 SCRA 498 [1990] « Apex Mining Go. v. NLRC, 196 SCRA 251 [1991] 42.04 CONDITIONS EMPLOYMENT -139-150; ARTS. 1689-1999, NEW CIVIL CODE © Ultra Villa Food Haus v. Geniston, 309 SCRA 17 [199] bout by the “Kasambahay Law” 1 See DEPARTMENT “Note changes brought a43.02. EMPLOYER — 183 ation of Empleyment Section 14, Te: STATUTORY REFERENCE: - Ants, Xill, See. 3, pais sue eee 5 |, Constitution: AMS: (b); Book VI. Rule |. Secs. 1, Secs, 1-8, Omnibus Rules A GENERAL CONCEPTS 44.01. SECURITY OF TENURE A. Nature of Security of Tenure: w Sonza v ABS-CBN Broadcasting Cop., 431 SCRA $83 2004) © Alhambra Industnes, Inc, v. NLRC, 238 SCRA 232 (1991) = Manila Electric Co. v. NLRC, 186 SCRA 763 (1991), CRA 621 (1998) = City Trust Banking Com. v, NLRC, 258 oh ic 427 SCRA 408 (2004) « Philips Semiconductors etc, ¥. Fadriquele, = Quijano v. Bartolabac, 480 SGRA 204 (2006) B. Importance of Employment Employment = Gonzales v. NLRC, 313 SCRA 169 [1999] C. State Regulation — Rationale Rationale @ Llosa-Tan v, Silahis Intemational Hotel, 184 SCRA 738 [1990] Oo. Coverage - 292 Contract Employee @ Labajo v. Alejandro, 165 SCRA 747 [1988]= tooay N Maritime Enterprises inc. v. NLRG, 235 SORA 268 E. Management Rights and Security of Tenure Management Rights and Security of Tenure © Coliegio de San Juan de Letran v. Assn. Of Employees, 2! 340 SCRA 597 (2000) © San Miguel Brewery ete, v. Opie, 170 SCRA 25 [19891 F. Guidelines on Imposition of Penalties * Valiao v. Court of Appeals, 435 SCRA 543 [2004] + Farroty. Court of Appeals, 325 SCRA 331 [2000] © ‘VA Manufacturing inc. v. NLRC, 322 SCRA 417 (2000) 7 Reyno v. Manila Electric Co., 434 SCRA 660 [2004] Factors « Associated Labor Union v NLRC, 302 SCRA 708 [1999] 714- 716 © Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. Inc, v. NLRC, 303 SCRA 9 [1999] Dismissai as Penalty * Cebu Filveneer Corp. v. NLRC, 286 SCRA 556 (1998) * Golden Thread Knitting Industries, Inc. v. NLRC, 304 SCRA 568 (1999) 2 Central Pangasinan Elec. Corp, v. Macaraeg, 395 SCRA 720 {2003} © Philips Semiconductors etc. v. Fadriquela, 427 SCRA 408 (2004) Rules — Managerial and Rank and Rank File Employee @ Salvador. Phil. Mining Services Corp., 395 SCRA 729 [2003), « Caoile v. NIRC, 299 SCRA 76 [1998] G. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT BY EMPLOYEE* Habana v. NLRC, 288 SCRA §37 (1998) Reauisites © Azcor Manufacturing Inc. v, NLRC, 303 SGRA 26 (189) > Motro Transit Orgamzation tne. v. NLRC, 284 SCRA 208 (1998) Voluntary Resignation © Phil, Wireloss inc. v. NLRC, 310 SCRA 653 (1999) @ Pascua v. NLRC, 287 SCRA 584 (1998) 3 (1999), = Azcor Manufacturing Inc. v. NLRG, 303 SCRA 26 © Valdez v. NURC. 286 SCRA 87 [1998] Fa : &- Manila Broadcasting Co. v. NLRC, 204 SCRA 486 [1998] =490-491 ERFORMANCE OF MILITARY OR CIVIC DUTY = 44.03. NO TERMINATION ~ PI 300; BOOK VI, RULE |, SEC. 12, OMNIBUS RULES: C, TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT BY EMPLOYER Ae Preliminary Matters: 44.04, BASIS OF RIGHT AND REQUIREMENTS Basis = Gutierrez v. Singer Sewing Machine Co... 411 SCRA 512 (2003] # Manila Trading and Supply Co., Inc. v. Zulieta, 69 Phil. 485 [1940] 486-487 # Agabon vs. NLRC, 442 SCRA 573 [2004] Age @ PLDT v. Tolentino, 438 SCRA 555 [2004] © Perez v. Medical City General Hospital, 484 SCRA 138 [2008]+ Fugites c © pees Somputer Products Com y. Court of Appeals, ABA SORA TST shone a nha Com. 445 SCRA = ht Netonal Bank v Caban 152 (2006) ? Geewne }. 460 SCRA 614 [2005] aoe \ Mogpantay, 463 SRA 169 (2008) +r CAUSE MAS TERMINATES ~ SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS - GROUNDS FOR ~ ‘Serious Misconduct — 296 (a) Definition and Acts = Valles v. Court of Appeats, 435 SCRA $43 [2004] = Villamor Golf Cub v. Pehid. 472 SCRA 6 [2005] © Lakpue Drug. ine. v. Beiga, 473 SCRA 617 (2005) + Coca-Cola Botters. Phil inc. v. Kapisanan ng Malayany Sa Coca-Cola, 452 SCRA 480 (2005) Inne, tay, 493 SCRA 195 [2008] + Premiere Dev. Bank y. Mantal. 485 SCRA 234 {2006} * Molina v. Pacific Plans inc., 484 SCRA 498 (2006) Willful Disobedience 7 Micro Sales jon Network v. NLRC, 472 SCRA 328 (2005) Operation * Bascon v. CA, 422 SCRA 122 [2004] = R Transport Com. v. Ejandra, 428 SCRA 725 [2004] ‘Gross and Habitual Neglect of Duties Requisites Judy Philippines v. NLRC, 289 SCRA 755 [1998] + Challenge Socks Com. v. CA, 474 SCRA 356 [2005] Gross and Habitual Negligence Defined = Valeo v. Court of Appeals, 435 SCRA 543 [2004] @ Reyes v. Maxim Tee House, 398 SCRA 288 [ 2003] = Cebu Filveneer Corp. v. NLRC, G.R. No. 126601 [1993] = Citibank NA. v. Gatchalian, 240 SCRA 212 (1895)© Ragule Transport Group v. NLRG, 284 SCRA C87 (1998) Fraud = willful Breach of Trust & Santos v. San Miguel Com, 399 SCRA 172 (2003) * Lakpue Drug v. Beiga, 473 SCRA 817 (2005) & Jardine Davies ine. v. NLRC, 311 SCRA 289 (1999) & PLOT v. Tolentino, G.R. No. 143171 (2004) = PNCC v, Matias, 458 SCRA 164 (2005) © Cruz v. CA, 494 SCRA 226 [2006] Breach of Trust — Logs of Confidence ® Central Pangasinan Electric Coop. v. Macaraeg, GR. No. 145800 [2003] Position, Trust and Confidence ® Santos v..San Miguel Corp., 399 SCRA 172 {2003} = Panday v. NLRC, 209 SCRA 122 [1992] © Gruz v. Coca— cola Boitlers Phils. Inc., 460 SCRA 340 (2005) Guidelines & Vitarich Com. v. NLRC, 307 SCRA 509 [1999] © Coca — cola Bottlers, Phil. Inc. v. Kapisanan ng Malayang Manggagawa sa Coca — cola, 452 SCRA 480 [2005] Willful Breach @ Atlas Consolidated Mining & Devt Corp. v, NLRC, 290 SCRA 479 [1998] Coverage Fujitsu Computer Products of the Phils. v. CA, 454 SCRA 737 eeLack of Damage “ Cadiz v. CA.474 SCRA 252 (2008) Commission of a Crime Analogous Case Quarreisome — Bossy * Cathedrat Schoo! of Technology v. NLRG, 214 SORA 85% [1992] © Heavylift Manila ine. v. CA, 473 SCRA 541 {2005} Probable Cause ” Standard Electric Manufacturing Corp. v. Standard Electie Employees Union, G.R. No. 166111 [2005] Conviction = Moral Turpitude @ Ini vy. NLRC, 221 SCRA 760 [1993] = Qania v. NURC, 244 SCRA 688 [1998] @ Lim v. NLRC, 259 SCRA 485 (1998) Other = Just Causes Claimed by Employer Abandonment Defined @& Nueva Ecija Electric Coop. Il v. NLRC, 461 SCRA 168 [2005) @ Gabuay v. Oversea Paper Supply Inc., 436 SCRA 514 [2004] Requisites « Leonardo v. NLRC, 333 SCRA 589 [2000] @ RP. Dinglasan Construction Inc. v. Atienza, 433 SCRA 263 {2004} = Floren Hotel v. NLRC, 458 SCRA 128 [2005]‘© Promiare Gev't Bank v. NLRG, 293 SGRA 49 11988) Loans “© Medical Doctors Ine. v. NLRC, 186 SCRA 763 1991) Pearl 8, Buck Foundation v. NLRC, 182 SCRA 446 (1990) Courtesy Resignation © Batongbacal v. Associated Bank, 168 SCRA G00 (1988) Work Attitude Absences SCRA 763 [1991] & Manila Electric Company v. NLRC, 186 © GSP Manufacturing Comp. v. Cabanban, 498 SCRA 128 {2008} Term Employment = Brent School v. Zamora, 181 SCRA 702 {1990] & Romares v. NLRC, 294 SCRA 411 [1998] « Medenilla v. Phil. Veterans Bank, G.R, No. 127673 {2000} 2 Magsalin v. National Organization of Working Men, G.R, No. 448492 [2003] & Labayog v. MY Son Biscuits Inc., G.R. No: 148102 [2008} Past Infractions Past Offenses Stellar Industrial Service Inc. v. NLRC, 252 SCRA 323 [1996] @ La Carlota Planters Association v. NLRC, 298 SCRA 252 [1998] Professional Training* Sentos v. NLRC. 287 SCRA 117 (1998) Love & Chit ~ quo v. Clave, 189 SCRA 117 (1990) a foo Association ¥. Glaxo = Teeth, 438 SORA 243 Violation of Company Rules & Aparente Sr. NLRG, 331 SCRA 82 (2000) Criminal Case Effect of Acuittat = Ramos v. NLRC, 288 SCRA 225 [1998} onviction © Sampaguita Garments Corp. v. NLRC, 233 SCRA 250 Dismissal — Criminal Case @ Lacorte v. nciong, 166 SCRA 1 [1988] Guilt or innocence a Chua v. NLRC, 218 SCRA 545 [1993] Moonlighting = Agabon v. NLRC, G.R. No. 158693 [2004] Suspicion « Eastem Telecommunications Phils, Inc. v. Diamse, 491 SCRA 239 [2006]© Lanzaderas v. Amethyst Secunty nd Goneral Services Ine. a ee SCRA 505 (2003) stn Phi. Plaza Hotel v. NLRC, 208 SCRA 326 (1999) = Castilo v. NLAG, 308 SCRA - - 326 [195 OSS Security and Allied See 19° NLRC, 325 SCRA 157 (2000) * Mendoza y. Rural Bank of Luchan, 433 SCRA 756 12004) Resignation and Effectivity * EMCO Plywoed Corporation v. Abelgas, = Shie Jie Com/Seaster Ex -IM Com. v. National Labor, 463 SCRA 569 [2005] Abolition of Position = Benguet Electric Cooperative v. Fianza, 425 SCRA 44 {20041 427 SCRA 498 [2004] Federation of Dishonesty = Naguit v. NLRC, 408 SGRA 617 [2003] Constructive Discharge fi & Phil, Japan Active Carbon Corp. v. NLRC, 471 SCRA 164 [1989] 2 Dusit Hotel Nikko v. NUWHRAIN, 466 SCRA 374 [2005] & Mobile Protective and Detective Agency v. Ompad, 458 SCRA 08 [2005] Duncan Association v. Glaxo - Wellcome, 438 SCRA 343 (2004) RP. Dinglasan Construction Ine. v. Atienza, 433 SCRA 263. (2004) Go v. CA (Mokdex Products), 430 SCRA 358 [2004] Acuna v. CA, G.R. No. 159832 [2006] Poseidon Fishing v. NLRC, G.R. No. 16802 (2006) eo 4 944 Ik ismissal in isch~ Globe — Mackay Cable and Radio Gon ¥ NLRC, 206 SCRA 702 (1992) Philippine Airtines Ino, v. NLRC, 202 SCRA 40 (1088) = Govle s GAGE Wo 1370400) = Maricalum Minang Corp. v. Docorion, 487 SCRA 182 (2008) Rationale 1901) = Kwikway Engineering Works v. NLRC, 198 SCRA 526 * Gatbonion v. NLRC, 470 SCRA 418 [2006] Number Offenses “© Aparente v. NLRC, G.R, No. 117652 [2000] OTHER CAUSES, BUSINESS RELATED CAUSES Recognition of Right — Business — Related ‘Causes/Proteation Agabon v. NLRC, G.R. No. 158693 [2004] + ae ¥. NLRC, 273 SCRA 35 (1987) = Filpinas y. Gatlal 73 [2 ilipinas v. Gatlabayan, 487 SCRA 673 [ 1 CA, 480 SCRA @ Business Services of the Future Today ine. Vv. $77 [2006] Installation of Labor Saving Devices &. Redundancy Business Judgement = Wiltshire File Co., inc. v. NLRC, 193 SCRA 665 [1991] + DOLE Philippines Inc. v. NLRO, 365 SCRA 124 (2001) * Asutrin v. SMC, 425 SCRA 270 [2004] Einaneial Loss @ Escareal v. NLRC, 213 SCRA 472 (1992)Wiltshire Filo Co., Inc. v. NLRO, 193 SCRA 685 19911 Loper Sugar Corp. v. Franco, GF, Nao. 148198 12009) a, 74 Tierra International Construction Corp. v. WLRE, 211 SC [1993] = Escereal v. NLRC, 213 SCRA 472 [1982] Edge Apparel inc. v. NLRC, 249 Pit 972 [1998] a = Selection Pantitio v. NLRC, 281 SCRA 53 [1997] Gokien Thread Knitting Industries, inc. v- NLRC, GR. No. SCRA 168 {2003} 11957 [1999] Tanjuan v. Phil. Postal Savings Bank, 411 Lopez Sugar Corp. v. Franco, G.R, No. 148125 2005] Employment of Independent Contractor — Effect RA 416 [1999] = Aslan Aleohol Corporation v. NLRC, 305 sci ployee V4 Procedure — Requirement «= Asian Alcohol Corporation v. NLRC, 305 SCRA 416 [1999] Hearing = Wiltshire File Co., Inc. v. NLRC, 193 SCRA 665 [1991] Venue of Complaint © Wiltshire File Co., Inc. v. NLRC, 193 SCRA 865 (1991) Retrenchment to Prevent Losses Defined « FF Manine Corp. v. NLRC, 455 SCRA 154 (2005) ion — Redundancy and Retrenchment Distin NLRO, 265 SCRAAlabang Country Club v. NLRC, 406 SCRA 229 (2005) ‘Covers, © Froggy Tubercolasis Sosioy ine. x WLRC, 20 SCRA SOT ‘© Balbalee v. NLRC, 251 SCRA 399 [1995] Procesure © Mayon Hotel & Restaurant v. Adana, 458 SCRA G02 [2005] Temporary Retrenchment * Sebugero v. NLRC, 248 SCRA 532 Requirements: * Loper Sugar Corp. v. Federation of Free Workers Phil. Labor Union Association, 189 SCRA 179 [1990] & EMCO Plywood Corporation v. Abelgas, 427 SCRA 496 (2008) * Blucor Minerals Corporation v. Amarilla, 458 SCRA 37 (2005) Employees Association v. Sto. Tomas, 48: Carpet SCRA 128 (2006) Nature of Loss = Lopez Sugar Corp. v. Federation of Free Workers Phil. Labor Union Association, 189 SCRA 179 (1990) ® Edge Apparel Inc. v, NLRC, 349 Phil 972 [1998] = Bogo — Medellin Sugarcane Planters Association V. NLRC, 296 SCRA 108 [1998] © Cama v. Joni's Food Services, 425 SCRA 259 [2004] & Philippines Carpet Employees Association v. Sto. Tomas, 483 SCRA 128 [2006] Sliding Income © San Miguel Jeepney Service v. NLRC, 265 SCRA 35 {1996} Proof of Loss tion of Free Workers Phil. Labor i A! © Lopez Sugar Corp. v. Federai SCRA 179 vy. NLRC, 2961 tenrseaon Com, v.(Chnyster Phil. Labor Union, GR. No. ‘© Danzas intercontinental ino, v. Daguman, 456: SCRA 383 (2005) Burden ef Proot “SY v. GA, 398 SCRA 301 (2003 Notional Bookstore ine v. GA. 478 SCRA 104 (2002) When Effected “ Lopez Sugar Comp. v. Federation of Free Workers Phil. Lebor Union Association, 189 SCRA 179 [1990] & Cajucom v. TPI, 451 SCRA 70 [2005] Procedure (for retrenchment and redundancy) % Sebugero v. NLRC, 248 SCRA 532 [1995] ae } 7 SCRA 495 [2004] rg incusoiot Tiebae Corp. Te een 171 (2006) Re— Hiring Effect = Atlantic Gulf and Pacifie Co. v, NLRC, 307 SCRA 714 (1999) Liabitity. ® Capitol Medical Center v. Meris, 470 SCRA 236 (2005), Closing of Business Right @ Mac Adams Metal v. Mac Adams Metal Engineering, 414 SCRA 411 (2003) © Catatisia v. NLRC, 247 SCRA 46 [1995] @ Alabang Country Club Inc. v. NLRC, 466 SCRA 329 (2005) ® Capito! Medical Center v. Meris, 470 SCRA 236 [2005} 2 Industrial Timber Com. v. Ababon, 480 SCRA 171 (2006) 340 [ RG, 325 SCRA 758F. Requisite " Me — Shum Comp. v. hte ~ Shum Worker's Association, 448 SCRA 41 (2005) TEMPORARY CESSATION OF OPERATION Basis * San Pedro Hospital af Digos Ine. v- S00, of Labor, 203 SCRA 93 [1996] = AT. General Services v. NLRG, GR. No. 148340 (2004) ©” Me — Shum Com. v, Me — Shurn Worker's Association. SCRA 41 [2005] _ = Mayon Hotel & ‘eestourant v. Adana, 458 SCRA G09 (2005) Effect of Employer — Employee Relationship abor, 263 SCRA 98 "= San Pedro Hospital of Digos inc. v. Sec: of L (1996) Installation: & Abapo v. CA, 438 SCRA 594 [2004] Floating Status Disease & Syv. CA, 398 SCRA 301 [2003] Special Case of Business Transfers Nature of Labor Contract @ Sundowner Dev. Corp. v. Drilon, 180 SCRA 14 [1989] Procedural Due Process — Nature and Requirements 1. Requirements Jn General* Cantral Pangasinan Electric Coop. v. Mecaraeg, 20% SCN 720 © Valao v. CA, 438 SCRA 843 (2004) ign te Counsel * Salaw v, NLRC, 202 SCRA? 11994) Notice * Colegio De San juon De Letran - Celemba v. Villas, 299 SCRA 550 (2003) ** Agabon v. NLRC; G.R. No. 189693 {2004} * Sta, Calalina College v. NLRC, 416 SCRA 233 {2003} Twa Notice Rule = Agabon v. NLRC, GR. No. 158693 [2004] = Caingat v. NLRC, 453 SCRA 142 (2005) © Genuino ice Co, inc. v. Magpantay, 493 SCRA 195 [2008] Hearing & Magos v. NLRC, 300 SCRA 484 [1998] CGaurdanetaan Piece Workers Union v. Laguesma, 286 SCRA 201 [1998] = National Semicanductor (HK) Distribution, LTD v. NLRC, 29% SCRA 348 [1998] © Lavador v. “S° Marketing Corp. 464 SCRA 497 (2005) Position P: & Shoppes Manila inc. v. NLRC, 419 SCRA 354 [2004] « GF, Sharp and Co. v. Ziaicita, 495 SCRA 387 [2006] Effect of Failu = Agabon v. NLRC, G.R. No. 158693 [2004] © Alladin v. CA, 460 SCRA 234 [2005] = Glaxo — Wellcome Philippines inc. v. Nagkakaisang Empleyado ng Wellcome - DFA, 453 SCRA 256 [2005] 2: Other Procedural MattersBargen = Equitebie PC! Bank r & Caguioa, 486 SCRA 658 [2005] CF Sharp and Co. Ziatsto, 495 SCRA 987 12008) Beare * Cont je 720 pe Blectric Coop, inc. v, Macaraeg, 985 SCRA * Salvador v. Phil. Mining Services Corp, 398 SCRA 720 (2002) Prescription * AzCOr Manufacturing tne. v. NLRC, 303 SCRA 26 [1999] Offer to Reinstate © Renerav. NLRC, 212 SCRA 631 [1992] i Sanctions and Remedies 14,07 GENERAL RULE Nature of Remedies - Twin Remedies * Pheschem v. Moldez, 458 SCRA 339 [2005] © Lakpue Drug v. Belga, 473 SCRA 617 [2005) + Great Southern Maritime Services Corp. v. Acuna, 425 SCRA 422 [2005] * Cabatulan v. Buat, 451 SCRA 234 [2005] s- Triad Security and Allied Services Inc. v. Ortega, 481 SCRA 591 [2008] Rationale for Remedies & Globe - Mackay Cable and Radio Com. v. NLRC, 206 SCRA 702 [1992]Defines 5 Union of Supervisors v. Sec. of Labor, 128 SCI - : . RA 442 [1084] Pheschom y. Mokdaz, 458 SCRA 339 [2005] : Employee Right 7 Quiano v. Mercury Drug, 292 SCRA 109 [1908] * Rosario v. Victory Ricomil, 307 SCRA 760 (2008) Effect of Faliure to Ask Relicf = General Baptist Bible College v. NLRC, 219 SCRA $40.(1999] * Pheschem v, Moldaz, 458 SCRA 339 [2005] Rules on Reinstatement Rationale @ Roquero v. Philippine Airlines Inc., 401 SCRA 424 PNOC- EDP v. Abella, 448 SCRA 549 [1993] Exceptions Eu fitic © Union of Supervisors v. Sec. of Labor, 128 SGRA 442 [1984] ® Espejo v. NLRC, 255 SCRA 430 (1996) Strained Relations & Pearl 8. Buck Foundation v. NLRC, G.R. No. 80728 [1980] = Commercial Motors Corp. v. NLRC, 192 SCRA 194 [1990] = Sibalv. Notre Dame of Greater Manila, 182 SCRA 538 [1990] Naga College Foundation Education Workers Org. v. Bose, 289 SCRA 274 [1998] @ Bascon v. CA, G.R. No. 144899 [2004] © Gabatulan v. Buat, G.R, No. 147142 [2005] = Acesite Corp. v. NLRC, G.R. No. 152308 [2005] «© BPi Employees Union v. BPI, 454 SCRA 357 [2005] # Sagum v. CA, 459 SCRA 223 (2005)© Jardine Davies v. NLRC, 225 SCRA TST [196 e : 1 = fgneer Texturizing Com ¥. NURC, 280 AGRA‘g09 [10071 (ragetiona! Container Servicos NLRC, 300 BERA’ 295 “ Kiamco v, NLRC, G.R. No, 120449 [1999] 14.09 BACKWAGES ‘Definition % Equitable Banking Com. v. Sackao, 490 SCRA 380 [2008] ® Si. Theresa's School of Novaliches Foundation v. NLRC, 259 SCRA 110 (1998) & General Baptist Bible College v. NLRC, G.R. No, 88534 (1093) * Viernes v. NLRC, G.R. No. 108405 (2003) ‘Nature = Pumose Claudio v: CA, 423 SCRA 122 [2004] Etlect of Failure to Claim @ Dela Cruz v. NLRC, 290 SCRA 1 [1998) ffect of Fail @ Aurora Land Projects Corp. v. NLRC, 266 SCRA 48 [1997] Period — Computation @ Itogon ~ Suyoe Mines Ine. v. Sangifoitogon Workers’ Union, 24 SCRA 873 [1968] @ FEATI University Faculty Club v. FEATI University, 85 SCRA 395 [1974] @& Mercury Drug Co. Inc. v. CIR, 56 SCRA 694 [1974] Pines City Educational Center v. NLRC, 227 SCRA 655 [1993] Bustamante v. NLRC, 265 SCRA 1 [1996} Torres v. NLRC, 330 SCRA 311 [2000] Kay Products Inc. v. CA, 464 SCRA 544 [1995] Standard Electric Manufacturing Corp v. Standard Electric Union, G.R. No. 99944Steet ination ** Lantion v. NLRC, 181 SCRA 813 (1990) 14,10 FINANCIAL ASSisTaANCE Allowed Financial Assistance © Phil. Long Distance Te _ ess tion felephone Company v. NLRC, GR. No = Salvarnia v. Letran College, 296 SCRA 184 [1998] & Gustilo v. Wyeth Phiippines, GR. No. 149629 (2004) Easter Shipping Lines Inc. v. Sedan, 486 SCRA 565 [2006] Not Allowed © Philigpine National Constniction Corp. v. NLRC, 170 SCRA 207 (1989) 2 Eastern Paper Mills inc. Vv. NLRC, 170 SCRA 595 [1989] © Chua v. NLRC, 453 SCRA 244 (2005) 14.11 SEPARATION PAY When ~ Alternative = Coca cola Boltlers Phils, v. Vital, 438 SCRA 278 [2004] = Gustilo v. Wyeth Philippines, G.R. No. 149629 [2004] ‘National Federation of Labor v. CA, G.R. No. 149464 [2004] Pheschem industrial Corp. v. Moidez, 458 SCRA 339 [2005] # Eicuban v. Sulpicio Lines, 448 SCRA 516 [2005] = Hanford Phil. Inc. v. Joseph, 454 SCRA 773 (2005) 194 When not Allowed @ North Davao Mining Corporation v. NLRC, 254 SCRA 721 [1996]7 Aning v. NERO mmo ¥. NLRC, GR. No. 125226 (1098) UABILITY OF CORPORATE OFFICERS Kiebiity Rye * Bogo — Medetin Sugarca 3 2 casts ene Ins Planters Association, Inc. v. NLRC. = NYK industnal v, NURC, 397 SCRA 489 [2003} = R88 ¥. Timbsl, Jr. 434 SCRA 384 (2004) cesite Com. v. NLRC, G.R. No. 152308 (2005) 14.12 DAMAGES: Section 15: MoravExemplary * Colegio San Juen De Letran — Calamba v. Villas, GR, No- 137795 [2003] * Asia Pacific Chartering ( Phils.) inc. v. Farolan, 393 SCRA 454 {2002} * Viemes v. NLRC, G.R. No. 108405 [2003] Tofosa v. NLRC, 401 SCRA 391 [2003} Maquiling v. Philippine Tubercolosis Society inc. 450 SCRA 465 £2005) Kay Products Inc. v. CA, 464 SCRA 544 [1995] Acuna v. GA, G.R.No. 159832 [2006} Acesite Comp. v. NLRC, G.R. No. 152308 [2005] ‘Sagum v. CA, G.R. No, 158759 [2005] 4q 949449 Nominal Damages * Cantra/ Luzon Conference v. CA, 466 SCRA 714 [2005] Retirement 15.01 RETIREMENTTynes © Certech vy, Reuters, 448. SCRA 395 (2005) Basis = SERN RS, 208 SORA 118 (1092) Saas: NOG Shipping and Transport Com. G.R. No. infemeetation = Lape: v. National Sigel 423. SCRA 108 [2004] 109 + Satomen v. Cee Shipping Lines inc, 487 SCRA 254 (2005) Age © MAI Philippines ino. v. NLRO, 181 SCRA 196 (1987) Rationale = Producers Bank of the Philiopines v. NLRC, 298 SCRA 517 (1883) Elgipiity = Brion ¥. South Philopine Union Mission of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, 307 SCRA 497 [1999] Ground Termination = Cainte Catholic Schoo! v. Cainta Catholic Schoo! Employees Union, 489 SCRA 488 [2008] 15.02 ACCRUAL OF BENEFITS* SVM Secu Tioga; AY & Protective Apancy.v. NLRC, 226 SORA Ta 15.04 BENEFITS AND Gratuity + Sta. iin Cateline Coltege v. NLRC, G.R. Mo 144483 (2003 PART THREE SOCIAL LEGISLATION STATUTORY REFERENCE: Social Security Act of 1987 (R.A: No. @282): ince Act of 1997 (RA No. 8291), Employees averse Service Insura: Pombensation and State Insurance Fund, Book IV. Labor Code of ihe hilippines, P.D. No. 442, as amended: Limited Portability Scheme ip Social Security insurance Systems (R.A No. 7699); and National Health Insurance Act of 1995 (R.A No. 7878) A. INTEGRATED OUTLINE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT; GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE ACT; AND EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION AND STATE INSURANCE FUND: AND NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE ACT 3.01. POLICY OBJECTIVES SSS - 2; GSIS - Whereas Clauses ECSIF - 165 NHIA - 2-3, 5* Latgar v. Emote, (1992) Bess Son "PORSAION Cocmissiin, 249 SCRA 715 3.02. DEFINITIONS 1 Employer SSS - 8(4) ~ see als GSis - 2a) ean ECSIF - 167 (9) 3. Dependent SSS ~ 8(3)(1); 8(e)(2): 8e)(3) GSIS- 2) ECSIF - 167(i) NHIA - 4(6) ry eficiari SSS = 8(k) GSIS — 29): 2h) ECSIF - 167(J) NHIA ~ 4(a) 3.03. COVERAGE SSS - Compulsory - arrangement 8(j) (4); NHIA -7 9, 9-A; Voluntary - {c); 11, 14-A; 9(b); CoverageGO OFal Sry Ni pace 12000) + Goward § RC. 341 SORA 65 Nua ¥. Coun of APpools, 440 SCRA toy (2004) OsIS- 3 ECSIF - 169.479 304. GFFECT OF StpaRATion FROM Gus ovMene 88S - 11.4 GSIS .y ECSIF 3.05. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SSS - 24 *" Poblete Construction Co. v. Asian, 20 SCRA.1143 (10671 GSIS - 6 NHIA ~ 24. 25 28,29, 3.06. FUNDING SSS - 18; 19; a(f) Fund Ownership * CMS Estate inc. v. Social Security System, 132 SCRA 108 (1984) GSIS - 58 ECSIF - 183(c) . EFFECT OF NON-REMITTANCE, SSS - 22(b) SSS Failure Remit x Santiago v. Court of Appeals, 133 SCRA 34 [1984] Abad, RA 434 [4308. BENEFITS 888 - 12 8818 - 24.27 Faaeehs 13; 19-4; 1346, 14, un 5:19, 20 ECSIF . aay Boor 191 192. 193; Aaah. 115,407 ie ‘haar ™ Come v. Commi S8ION On Aunt, Ecsir 264 SCRA 19 [1996] i = ith ay ygrees Compensation Commission v. Sonico, 24 SCRA 268 & {1899) ‘SS v. Court of Appoals, 499 SCRA 230 (2004) Manifestation * Government Se 430 (1998) a = GSIS v. Court of Appeals, 304 SCRA 243 (1999) Permanent Total Disability « Employees Compensation Commission v. Sanico, 34 SCRA 268 (1999) @ Government Service Insurance System v. Court of Appeals, 285 SCRA, Insurance System v, Court of Appeals. 285 SCRA 430 (1998) @ Santos v. Employees Compensation Commission, 224 SCRA 182 (1993) = Narazo v. Employees Compensation Commission, 181 SCRA 874 (1990) Unknown Cause = Pano v, Employees Compensation Commission, 172 SCRA 845 ae Z : ‘iBeer v. Emp, esp M88 Comp ON dion Cotnrtite she , QSsUuPstional Oneage © Goverment & 430 (1909) © 50/0 Inauraneg 208 SORA 558, 8 YOM, Coun of Appeals, 265 SCRA 3.09. BASIS OF CLAIM SSS -2 GSIS ~ 45-17 ECSIF - 472: 174 * Riflo'v. Employees Compensation Commission, 931 SCR $96 (2000) mi joing Rul = aan v. Employees Compensation Commission. 197 SCRA 441 1) 3.10. PRESCRIPTIVE PERIOD SSS - 1144(2); New Civil Code ECSIF - 201 Remittance @& Benedicto v. Abad Santos, 183 SCRA 434 (1990) Regi: ion @ People v. Montiero, 192 SCRA 548 (1990)B12 3.13, © Mipoqusin (1988) % Empioyees Compensation Commission, 172 SORA 360. BENEFIT PROTECTION 86S - 15:46: 17 GSIS.- 39 ECSIF - 198; 203: 175. DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SSS -5 GSIS = 30,31; 32 ECSIF - 180, 162 NHIA = 39-43