Independent Coast Observer (USPS 881280) Published weekly from offices at ___ 38500 Highway 1, Gualala, California 95448 SEPTEMBER 18, 2015 Angry opposition to winery ‘event centers’ on coast By Chris McManus Organizations like Sonoma County's Preserve Rural Sonoma Permit and Resource County and Coastal ‘Management District See Opposition... (PRMD) didn't antici- Continued on Page 4 pate the firestorm of public opposition to one change in Its_prelimi- nary draft of the Local Goustal Plan update when it scheduled four public workshops on the revisions. In fact its original presentation and the first few work- shops didn't even talk about the controversial changes to the Agricul- ture section, But letters. like Will Guyan's “Protections gutted” in the Aug. 28 ICO and the OpEd “Stealth Move on the So noma Coast,” by Rueben. Weinzveg in the Sopt. 1! Sonoma County Gazette have complained loudly about a provision that would allow a prolifera. m of vineyards and wineries with event cen- ters on the coast.Opposition. from Page 1 Hills Rural Preservation have been mobilizing public opinion, and Mon- day an overfiow crowd, many wearing ‘Save Our Coast” signs, packed the meeting room at the Timber Cove Fire De- partment to give PRMD staffers an earful. The Timber Cove workshop had been added to the schedule of road shows and this public comment period extended by four weeks to address the growing dissatisfaction ‘on the coast, Sandi Potter, Com- prehensive __ Plenning Manager at PRMD, was barely into her Power be- fore former Sonoma County Supervisor Er- nie Carpenter and oth- ers began interrupting with comments about the Agriculture scction ofthe proposed update. Many opposing the changes to the Local Coastal Plan are tho same people who op- posed tho expansion of printing facilities at nearby Ratna Ling Re- treat Center and are still fighting that issue incourt. But while the Cali- fornia wine industry might have money, #9 far it hasn't showed up for this fight with orga- nized groups of speak- ers and attorneys like Ratna Ling did at simi- lar Sonoma County gov- ernmental meetings. No one at Monday night's meeting spoke in favor of the changes that would allow the winery event centers on the coast. Jennifer — Barrett, Deputy Planning Diree- tor. told attendees her agency was hearing resi- dents’ concerns. “I hear Opposition... from Page 4 put new language in the Graft or write @ range of policy options for the Planning — Commission ‘and Board of Supervie The County is near the beginning of an ap- proximately 18-month process of updating the Local Coastal Plan. That process will include an- other droft with another comment period and that youre not happy with the draft,” she said, “This is not a fait accom- She added that a lot of issues with vineyards and tasting rooms have been raised in inland parts of the county as well. “Phe question we need to address is ‘is viticultural tourism ap- propriate on the coast?” But Barrett said the current Local Coastal Plan already allows for vineyards, with a Vine- yard Erosion and Sedi- ment Control Ordinance (VESCO) permit, and for wineries and tasting rooms with a use permit ‘and or coastal permit, “Preventing event con- ters on tho coast is going to take more than just keeping the current lan- guage,” sho said. “What do we need to do to influence the draft,” asked Bruco Johnson. “Do we neod to give you numbers and angry peo- ple kicking your asses? Do more letters count?” But Barrett urged people to send their in- put, including specific language changes if they desired, and said all comments would be considered. She added that PRMD would either ‘See Opposition. Continued on Page 5 public hearings at the Planning Commission, the Board of Supervisors and ultimately the Cali- fornia Coastal Commis- sion. ‘The complete prelimi- nary draft can be found at sonoma-county.org/ prmd/docsicoastal/, Comments can be sub- mitted to PRMD-LOP. Update@sonoms-county, org or by US. mail to PRMD, 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa, Rosa, California, 95403.