Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Small Signal Stability Analysis and Optimal Control of A Wind Turbine With Doubly Fed Induction Generator
Small Signal Stability Analysis and Optimal Control of A Wind Turbine With Doubly Fed Induction Generator
Introduction
2
2.1
dEd0
L
1
sr vs Eq0 vs m vqr 0
dt
Lrr
T0
h
i
Ed0 (Xs Xs0 )iqs
(3)
dEq0
L
1
sr vs Ed0 vs m vdr 0
dt
Lrr
T0
h
i
Eq0 (Xs Xs0 )ids
(4)
Basically, DFIG is an induction-type generator. The equivalent circuit of DFIG as shown in Fig. 1a is similar to that of
an induction machine [17].
Defining E d0 2(vsLm/Lrr)cqr , E q0 2(vsLm/Lrr)cdr ,
Xs vsLss , X s0 vs[Lss 2 (L2m/Lrr)], T00 Lrr/Rr , the
model of DFIG can be given as follows
Xs0 dids
1
0
vds Rs
(X Xs )
vs dt
vs T00 s
where cdr and cqr are the direct (d ) and quadrature (q)
axis rotor flux linkages, respectively; Lss is the stator
self-inductance; Lrr is the rotor self-inductance; Lm is
the mutual inductance; Rr is the rotor resistance; vs is
the synchronous angle speed; sr is the rotor slip; Xs
is the stator reactance; X s0 is the stator transient reactance;
E d0 and E q0 are the d and q axis voltages behind the transient reactance, respectively; T 00 is the rotor circuit time
constant; ids and iqs are the d and q axis stator currents,
respectively; vds and vqs are the d and q axis stator terminal voltages, respectively; vdr and vqr are the d and q axis
rotor voltages, respectively.
ids (1 sr )Ed0
Lm
1
v
E0 Xs0 iqs
Lrr dr vs T00 q
Xs0 diqs
1
0
vqs Rs
(X
X
)
s
vs dt
vs T00 s
2.2
(1)
iqs (1 sr )Eq0
752
Lm
1
v
E0 Xs0 ids
Lrr qr vs T00 d
(2)
dvt
Tm Tsh
dt
(5)
dutw
vt vr vt (1 sr )vs
dt
ds
2Hg r Tem Tsh
dt
du
Tsh Ksh utw Dsh tw
dt
(6)
(7)
(8)
0:5rpR2 Cp Vw3
vt
Tem Ps =vs
(9)
(10)
where
1 RCf
Cp
0:022b 2 e0:255RCf =l
2 l
(11)
Model of controllers
ref
(17)
(18)
Model of converter
(12)
where Pr is the active power at the AC terminal of the rotorside converter; Pg is the active power at the AC terminal of
the grid-side converter; PDC is the active power of the DC
link. These are given by
Pr vdr idr vqr iqr
(13)
(14)
dvDC
dt
(15)
where idr and iqr are the d and q axis rotor currents, respectively; idg and iqg are the d and q axis currents of the grid-side
converter, respectively; vdg and vqg are the d and q axis voltages of the grid-side converter, respectively; vDC is the
capacitor DC voltage; iDC is the current of the capacitor;
C is the capacitance of the capacitor.
Substituting (13 15) into (12), the model of the converters and DC link can be derived as follows
Fig. 2 Control block of the WT system
dv
CvDC DC vdg idg vqg iqg (vdr idr vqr iqr )
dt
IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., Vol. 1, No. 5, September 2007
(16)
dx2
iqr
dt
ref
iqr
ref
vs
ref
Kp3 (vs
dx4
idr
dt
ref
(20)
vs ) Ki3 x3
ref
(19)
(21)
3.3
idr
Kp3 (vs
vs ) Ki3 x3 idr
ref
(22)
(23)
db
T Tsh
Kp4 m
Ki4 Dvt
dt
2Ht
(24)
where Kp1 and Ki1 are the proportional and integrating gains
of the power regulator, respectively; Kp2 and Ki2 are the proportional and integrating gains of the rotor-side converter
current regulator, respectively; Kp3 and Ki3 are the proportional and integrating gains of the grid voltage regulator,
respectively; idr_ref and iqr_ref are the current control references for the d and q axis components of the generator
side converter, respectively; vs_ref is the specified terminal
voltage reference; Pref is the active power control reference
and is given by
Pref PB
vt
vtB
(25)
Pitch controller
where Kp4 and Ki4 are the proportional and integrating gains
of the WT speed regulator, respectively; Dvt is the deviation of the WT rotating speed.
4
Equations (1) (7) and (16) form the model of the WT with
DFIG, among which (1) and (2) describe the dynamics of
the stator current, and may be neglected in electromechanical transient stability analysis by making the left hand side
differentials equal to zero. Equations (17), (19), (20), (22)
(24), (26), (28) (32) form the model of the controllers. The
dynamic model of the WT with DFIG may be written in the
compact form
x_ f (x, z, u)
z g(x, u)
ref
ref
vDC
dx6
idg
dt
ref
dx7
iqg
dt
ref
Dvdg Kpg
iqg
(27)
(28)
(29)
754
(30)
dx7
Kig x7
dt
KPg (iqg
ref
iqg ) KIg x7
5
Small signal stability analysis model of WT
with DFIG
Interfacing with power grid
Dvqg Kpg
5.1
dx6
Kig x6
dt
(33)
(34)
(26)
idg
(32)
(31)
(35)
where V is the voltage of the infinite bus; Vs/w is the terminal voltage of the DFIG generator stator winding; XTL is the
combined reactance of the transformer and transmission
line, and given by XTL XT XL .
The network voltage equation (35) and the WT model are
presented in x y and d q references of frame, respectively.
The relationship between these two references of frame is
illustrated in Fig. 3b, while the corresponding transfer
IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., Vol. 1, No. 5, September 2007
where B is the reduced system state matrix, whose dimension is 14 14. x0 is the reduced state vector, given by
x0 [vt , b, utw , sr , Ed0 , Eq0 , x1 , x2 , x3 ,
x4 , vDC , x5 , x6 , x7 ]T
6
6.1
Fig. 3 Interface with power grid
a SMIB system
b d2q frame respect to x2y frame
function is given by
fd
cos w
fq
sin w
sin w
cos w
fx
fy
(36)
where fd and fq are the d and q axis components, respectively; fx and fy are the x and y axis components, respectively.
Substituting (36) into (35), we have
" #
vds
0
XTL
cos w
V
vqs
sin w
XTL
0
" # " #!
ids
idg
(37)
iqs
iqg
The voltage equation of the grid-side converter is
vdg
0 XTg idg
vds
vqs
vqg
XTg
0
iqg
(38)
Dvqs
XTL
0
"
# "
#!
Didg
Dids
(39)
Diqs
Diqg
#"
"
# "
# "
#
Didg
Dvds
Dvdg
0 XTg
(40)
Dvqs
Dvqg
XTg
0
Diqg
s
21.19
f, Hz
ASV1
66.7
10.6
ASV3
sr
utw
E d0
vDC
E q0
E d0
26.34
29.2
l5
22.0
vt
l6
272.8
vDC
l3,4
4.65
ASV2
(41)
(42)
Dx BDx
(43)
270.2
22.24
270.4
f, Hz
113.4
18
ASV1
ASV2
E q0
x3
60
9.55
Sr
utw
52.4
8.34
E d0
x1
vt
0.68
0.11
l9
217 041
vDC
l10
2173.6
x5
x6
l7,8
20.32
l11
281.89
x1
x7
l12
214.5
x5
x6
l13
224.1
x2
x4
l14
224.97
x4
x2
755
Table 3:
l1,2
l3,4
l5,6
l7
2101
22.46
277.7
268 251
2193
59.9
67.8
63.4
l8
l9
determined by
vi, j (t 1) w(t) vi, j (t) c1 r1 (xi, j xi, j (t))
c1 r1 (x
j xi, j (t))
xi, j (t 1) xi, j (t) vi, j (t 1)
(44)
(45)
l10
l11
l12
l13
l14
289.6
217.9
217.6
24.18
20.15
20.03
PSO algorithm is employed to search the optimal parameters for the controllers of WT with DFIG in order to
achieve the optimal coordinated control of multiple controllers of the WT system. The procedure of the optimal controller design is shown as follows:
Step 1: Initialisation
From Section 2, there are 12 parameters, Kp1 , Ki1 , Kp2 , Ki2 ,
Kp3 , Ki3 , Kpdg , Kidg , Kpg , Kig , Kp4 and Ki4 for the controllers
of WT system. The electrical dynamics are much faster than
mechanical dynamics, so that the control of electrical
dynamics can be decoupled from that of mechanical
dynamics. The controllers of electrical dynamics are
j 1, 2, . . . , 10
(46)
where xj,max and xj,min are the upper and lower bounds of
member j of particles, respectively; vj,max and vj,min are
the maximum and minimum velocities of member j of particles, respectively; N is the interval of the dimension, which
is normally chosen between 5 and 10. Then the initial velocities V(0) fvi,j(0), i 1, 2, . . ., n, j 1, 2, . . .,10g are
generated randomly between [vj,min , vj,max].
Step 2: Evaluation
Evaluate the fitness value of the initial group of particles
[14], which is given by
F max {Real(lg ), g 1, 2, . . . , 14}
(47)
(48)
(49)
go to Step 2.
757
7
7.1
WT with controllers
7.3
Dynamic simulations
SMIB system
Four-machine system
The four-machine system used in the simulations was modified from the four-machine system used for small signal
stability analysis [17]. The original four-machine system
can be divided into two areas, and each of them consists
of two machines, the details of which can be found in [17,
22]. Generator 3 is replaced by a wind farm, which is the
same as that used in the above SMIB system.
8.2.1 Small disturbance: The step change of 20.1 pu
was applied to the voltage reference of the DFIG. The
dynamics of terminal voltage, DC-link voltage and output
active power are shown in Figs. 6a c, respectively. It can
be seen that using the optimised controller parameters, the
dynamic performance of the WT has been significantly
improved where the oscillation after the disturbance was
damped out very quickly. Generator 4 (G4) is near the
WT, and its dynamic responses were affected significantly.
The dynamics of the terminal voltage of G4 are illustrated in
Fig. 6d. It can be seen that applying the optimised controllers, the oscillation of the terminal voltage of G4 was
damped quickly, the damping the multi-machine system
was enhanced.
759
Conclusion
A dynamic model of the WT with DFIG including its converters and controllers has been presented, based on which
the model for small signal stability analysis has been established. The small signal stability analysis of the WT system
with and without controllers has also been carried out. It has
been found that the WT with DFIG system without the controllers is originally stable, while using the controllers the
dynamic performance of the WT system can be improved.
A novel parameter tuning method based on PSO was proposed to optimise the parameters of the controllers. The
coordinated control of the WT system controllers has
been achieved by using an optimisation technique for
multiple controllers parameters. In the optimisation, it
has also been found that the PSO algorithm is very easy
to implement, and can find the optimised controllers
parameters very quickly. In addition, using the optimised
parameters, the dynamic performance of WT system can
be improved, and therefore the capability of the fault ridethrough can be enhanced. The numerical examples have
demonstrated the importance of the DFIG control with
properly tuned controller parameters on both the SMIB
system and the multi-machine system.
10
References
1 Eriksen, P.B., Ackermann, T., Abildgaard, H., Smith, P., Winter, W.,
and Rodriguez Garcia, J.M.: System operation with high wind
penetration, IEEE Power Energy Mag., 2005, 3, (6), pp. 65 74
2 Lei, Y., Mullane, A., Lightbody, G., and Yacamini, R.: Modeling of
the wind turbine with a doubly fed induction generator for grid
integration studies, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2006, 21, (1),
pp. 257264
3 Mei, F., and Pal, B.C.: Modelling and small-signal analysis of a grid
connected doubly-fed induction generator. Proc. of IEEE PES
General Meeting, 2005, San Francisco, USA
4 Yamamoto, M., and Motoyoshi, O.: Active and reactive power
control for doubly-fed wound rotor induction generator, IEEE
Trans. Power Electron., 1991, 6, (4), pp. 624 629
5 Muller, B.S., Deicke, M., and De Doncker, R.W.: Doubly fed
induction generator system, IEEE Ind. Appl. Mag., 2002, 8, (3),
pp. 2633
6 Pena, R., Clare, J.C., and Asher, G.M.: Doubly fed induction
generator using back-to-back PWM converters and its application to
variable-speed wind-energy generation, IEE Proc., Electr. Power
Appl., 1996, 143, (3), pp. 231241
7 Hughes, F.M., Anaya-Lara, O., Jenkins, N., and Strbac, G.: Control of
DFIG-based wind generation for power network support, IEEE
Trans. Power Syst., 2005, 20, (4), pp. 19581966
8 Ekanayake, J.B., Holdsworth, L., Wu, X.G., and Jenkins, N.:
Dynamic modeling of doubly fed induction generator wind
turbine, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2003, 18, (2), pp. 803809
9 Ju, P., Handschin, E., and Reyer, F.: Genetic algorithm aided
controller design with application to SVC, IEE Proc., Gener.
Transm. Distrib., 1996, 143, (3), pp. 258 262
10 Lansberry, J.E., and Wozniak, L.: Adaptive hydrogenator governor
tuning with a genetic algorithm, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1994, 9,
(1), pp. 179183
11 Fogel, D.B.: Evolutionary computation: toward a new philosophy
of machine intelligence (IEEE Press, New York, 2000, 2nd edn.)
760
11
kp1 1 pu, ki1 100 s21, kp2 0.3 pu, ki2 8 s21, kp3
1.25 pu, ki3 300 s21, kp4 kp2 , ki4 ki2 , kpdg 2.4 pu,
kidg 60 s21, kp5 10 pu, ki5 100 s21, kpg 1 pu,
kig 100 s21
13 Appendix C: parameters used during
optimisation
Parameters of PSO
n 100, N 10
w 0.9, c1 2, c2 2
Lower and upper bounds for controller parameters
Xmax [1.5, 150, 0.45, 12, 1.875, 450, 0.05, 0.1, 1.5,
150];
Xmin [0.5, 50, 0.15, 4, 0.625, 150, 0.001, 0.025, 0.5, 50]
14
kp1 0.6 pu, ki1 80.4 s21, kp2 0.27 pu, ki2 5.1 s21,
kp3 1.48 pu, ki3 219 s21, kp4 kp2 , ki4 ki2
kpdg 14.4 pu, kidg 64.8 s21,
kpg 0.73 pu, kig 131 s21
IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., Vol. 1, No. 5, September 2007