Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4.2
Six-train plant
To achieve a throughput of 130,000 b/d of GTL products,
the Sasol SPD process is configured as six trains utilising
the three technology-types typical of all GTL processes:
Syngas production: Six trains using Haldor Topses
autothermal reforming (ATR) technology are required to
convert the methane-rich feed to syngas (hydrogen and
carbon monoxide); additionally, six air-separation units
(ASUs), each with a nominally capacity of 4,500 tonnes a
day, provide the required oxygen for the ATR reactor;
FT synthesis: The licensed Sasol SPD process is used
to produce liquid hydrocarbons from syngas through the
FT reaction. Through process intensification and further
catalyst development, an increase in the Sasol SPD process reactor capacity from 17,000 b/d for the Oryx GTL
process to a value in excess of 20,000 b/d can be
achieved. This is significantly higher than can be achieved
through multi-tubular fixed-bed reactor designs. The Sasol
SPD process, therefore, requires significantly fewer
reactors to achieve the same capacity; and
Product work-up: Upgrading of FT synthesis products
into saleable products can be achieved in two 65,000 b/d
trains using a combination of ChevronTexacos hydrocracking, hydrotreating and isodewaxing technologies
well within proved conventional refining practice. These
units produce GTL diesel (an ultra-clean diesel product),
GTL naphtha and FT base-oil products.
In addition to the above, a number of hydrogen production packages are required to provide the necessary
hydrogen feedstock for the GTL processes.
Economic drivers
The costs associated with integrated GTL projects have
typically been quoted in the range of $4bn to $6bn. Such
large investment decisions require clear economic incenFundamentals of Gas to Liquids, 2005
45
Paul Hayward
4.2
Technology
tives and drivers. Broadly speaking, for the next generation of integrated GTL projects these can be classified as:
Premium GTL process fuels: Marketing trials by Sasol
and other GTL manufacturers have already established
that GTL diesel will command a slight price premium over
conventional products, because of performance enhancements and environmental benefits. Given the large and
increasing global demand for diesel, potential demand for
GTL-diesel products is almost unlimited;
Feedstock costs: Increased revenue through gas-plant
derived products and no external payment for GTL feedstock leading to an overall greater internal rate of return;
Economies of scale: Reducing $/b construction and production costs;
Reliability of feedstock: Feedstock quality and provision
remain in the control of the integrated facility; and
Product diversification: Exploitation of gas reserves into
products that tap existing, mature hydrocarbons markets
allowing divergence from oil-based products and providing the host country with an expanded products portfolio.
Premium products
Notwithstanding the economic drivers highlighted above,
a project is only viable if its products have a competitive
advantage and existing markets are not saturated. For
premium GTL products both these criteria are satisfied.
The recent trend in the oil price to above $50/b demonstrates that demand for crude and its derived products
outweigh available supply.
GTL facilities, while not adding significantly to the worlds
effective refining capacity, will command a small premium
for their products through the remarkable properties of GTL
products low in aromatics; almost zero sulphur, nitrogen
and metals; and primarily paraffinic which ensure they
Gas plant
Reservoir fluid
Sulphur
Feed
separation
Gas
clean-up
NGL
extraction
Field condensate
GTL plant
Light ends
Methane-rich gas
Syngas
production
Product
work-up
FT synthesis
GTL diesel
GTL naphtha
Oxygen
By-products
46
Petroleum Economist
Technology
Process drivers
As with any process optimisation, the interaction between
capital and operating costs is essential in evaluating options.
For mature facilities, such as refineries and gas plants, these
optimisations are relatively well understood. However, when
combining a gas plant with a GTL plant the new optimum
configuration shifts from that for the equivalent standalone
plants. Defining this point is critical to a successful design
and a significant number of studies have been undertaken
to achieve this through the evaluation of key process drivers:
Capital cost: Driving down capital cost with consideration
of other critical parameters, such as operating cost and
availability/reliability is essential in any evaluation;
Energy management: While GTL plants consume significant quantities of energy, the high-temperature processes
allow significant quantities of heat to be recovered from
the process in the form of steam generation, which can in
turn be used to generate power. Because gas plants are
net energy consumers, this provides the opportunity for
energy integration and synergies across the two plants;
Water management: GTL plants produce significant
quantities of water requiring upgrading and management
to ensure an efficient and environmentally robust
design, maximising reuse of water as far as is reasonable. The relatively small water-management systems
required by gas plants means these can be accommodated with only modest increases in the systems
required for a standalone GTL plant;
GTL feedstock cost: Including the offshore facilities and
gas plant in the overall scope shifts the cost of methanerich gas downwards from an intermediate profit-driven
cost to an internal cost, changing the dynamics for energy integration, including fuel and power costs;
GTL feedstock composition: Considerations are somewhat different to those for gas pipeline projects, placing
different requirements and burdens on the gas and GTL
plants alike; and
Start-up costs: Minimisation of equipment specified
solely for start-up was a significant area of optimisation for
Oryx GTL and can be further extended to facilitate the
start-up requirements for an integrated project.
In evaluating these and other process drivers, Foster
Wheeler and Sasol sought to deliver cost effective solutions to improve the efficiency and availability of the overall facility whilst ensuring environmental and safety
requirements are met or surpassed.
Project challenges
The development of an integrated facility requires many
challenges to be overcome and addressed to successfully execute such a project:
Petroleum Economist
4.2
Moving forward
The successful financing, cost management, technical
integrity and project execution of the Oryx GTL project
has been followed with great interest by the industry.
With the planned development of worldscale integrated
GTL facilities, another major step change is on its way.
Foster Wheeler and Sasols experience through Oryx
GTL, and other GTL developments, provides the necessary vision to implement the next generation of integrated GTL facilities.
Fundamentals of Gas to Liquids, 2005
47