Doshisha Clinical Psychology: Therapy and Research

2012, Vol.2, No.1, Pp.69-80

What is the function of value?: A review of evidence-based value researches

Asako SAKANO

Takashi MUTO

Acceptance & Commitment Therapy

ACTACT

QOL
ACT

1998

p.520

Graduate School
of Psychology, Doshisha University

Faculty of Psychology, Doshisha

University

1950

- 69 -

69-802012
Kluckhohn1951

18

Table

Kluckhohn1951

Schwartz RVS

p.395

Schwartz1992

Rokeach1973

RVS

p.5

Kluckehorn

10

Rokeach

Schwartz1992Schwartz

Value SurveySVSSVS 10

Rokeach

Rokeach
1973

Rokeach

openness to changeconservation

Value SurveyRVS

self-enhancement

self-transcendence

RVS

Figure

terminal

SVS 10

value

Schwartz,

instrumental value

1994Schwartz1994

SVS 40

TableRVS Rokeach, 1973

Terminal value
A comfortable lifeFamily security

Pleasure

An exciting lifeFreedom

Salvation

A sense of achievement

Self-respect

Happiness

A world at peace

Inner harmony

Social recognition

A world of beauty

Mature love

True friendship

Equality

National security

Wisdom

Ambitious

Forgiving

Logical

Broad-minded

Helpful

Loving
Obedient

Instrumental value

Capable

Honest

Cheerful

Imaginable Polite

Clean

IndependentResponsible

Courageous

Intellectual

- 70 -

Self-controled

Openness to change

Self-transcendence

Self-direction Universalism

Stimulation

Benevolence

Hedonism

ConformityTradition

Achievement

Power

Security

Conservation

Self-enhancement

FigureSVS 10Schwartz19921994

Schwartz & Bardi, 2001

SVS

Parks & Guay,

2009

Dollinger, Leong, & Ulicni,

attitude

1996Roccas et al, 2002Veage, Ciarrochi,

Rockeach, 1973
ideal

& Heaven, 2011 Roccas et al.

Hitlin & Pliavin,

2002

2004
traits

NEO NEO-PIMontag & Levin,

1994Schwartz Schwartz,

Roccas, Sagiv, Schwartz, & Knafo, 2002

1992

norms

agreeableness

openness to experience

Hitlin

extraversion

needs
& Pliavin, 2004

conscientiousness

Rokeach, 1973

Bardi & Schwartz

2003

- 71 -

69-802012

Seligman, 2002

Bardi et al.2003

Flow

Well-being

Quality of lifeQOL

Dubinsky, Kotabe, Lim,

& Wagner, 1997

Ga

rling, 1999

2009

2009

2006

2006

meaningfulness

comprehensibility

manageability

Sense of CoherenceSOC

Who am I Kuhn
& McParland, 1954

21

human strength

Snyder & Lopez, 2002

- 72 -

ACT

ACT

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

ACT

ACT

relational frame theory Hayes, Barnes-

Holms, & Roche, 2001

Wegner, 1987ACT

Skinner, B. F.

2006

ACT

QOL

ACT

Follette, Linnerooth, & Ruckstuhl, 2001

2001

positive reinforcement

FigureACT

get

19952001

2009

Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson1999

Figure ACT
2006

- 73 -

69-802012

2006

ACT

ACT

ACT

ACT

ACT

consequences

Branstetter-

Rost, Cushing, & Douleh, 2009Gutie

rrez,

Luciano,

McMullen, Barnes-Holmes, Barnes-Holmes,

lguez,
Rodr

&

Fink,

2004

Wilson, 2009, p.66 2009pp.105-

Stewart, Luciano, & Cochrane, 2008

106

lnez,
Pa
ez-Blarrina, Luciano, Gutie
rrez-Mart

lguez-Valverde,
Valdivia, Ortega & Rodr

2008a Pa
ez-Blarrina, Luciano, Gutie
rrez-

lnez, Valdivia, Rodr

lguez-Valverde &

Mart

Ortega, 2008b

Branstetter-Rost et al.

2009

Follette et

al., 2001

ACT

ACT

Dahl,

Plumb, Stewart, & Lundgren, 2009

- 74 -

10

Gregg,

Callaghan, Hayes, & Glenn-Lawson, 2007

Levin, Hildebrandt,

Twohig, Hayes, & Masuda, 2006

Lillis, & Hayes2011

Ciarrochi, Fisher, & Lane2010

self-affirmation

10

QOL

ACT

Cohen, Garcia, Apfel, & Master, 2006

value clarification

Harris & Napper, 2005

ACT

Schmeichel & Vohs, 2009

Hayes & Smith, 2005

Spencer, Fein, &

ACT Wilson, 2009

Lomore, 2001 Lehmiller, Law,

& Tormala, 2010

ACT

ACT

ACT

SOC

- 75 -

69-802012
ACT

Follette et al, 2001Adams, 2012

ACT

2001

Follette et al2001

contenttopography

ACT

ACT

ACT

process

ACT

ACT

10

ACT

ACT

ACT

ACT

ACT

Lundgren, Dahl, & Melin2007

Bulls-Eye

ACT

Figure

- 76 -

Work/Education

Leisure

Personal growth/Health

Relationships

FigureBulls-eye Dahl, Plumb, Stewart, & Lundgren, 2009

Hayes2011

ACT

Adams, N (2012). Skinners Walden Two:

An anticipation of positive psychology?

Review of General Psychology, 161-9
2006

Sense of Coherence

ACT

29-40

ACT

Bardi,

A.,

&

Schwartz,

S.

H.

(2003).

Values and behavior: Strength and

structure of relations. Personality and

Social Psychology Bulletin, 291207-

1220.

Branstetter-Rost,

A.,

Douleh,

(2009).

T.

Cushing,
Personal

C.

&

values

and pain tolerance: Does a values

ACT

intervention

Journal of Pain, 10887-892

add

to

acceptance?

Ciarrochi, J., Fisher, D., & Lane, L. (2010).

The

value success, and well-being among

people diagnosed with cancer. Psycho-

between

value

motives,

Oncology, 201184-1192

link

Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., &

- 77 -

69-802012
35767-784

Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial

achievement gap: A social-psychological

Harris, P. R. & Napper, L. (2005). Self-

intervention. Science, 3131307-1310

affirmation and the biased processing

Dahl, J. C., Plumb, J. C., Stewart, I., &

of threatening health-risk information.

Lundgren, T. (2009). The art & science

Personality

of valuing in psychotherapy: Helping

Bulletin, 311250-1263

clients discover, explore, and commit to

valued action
commitment

Oakland

Page-Value

CA:

K. (1996). On traits and values: With

to

Journal

experience.

of

Card.

Association

for

contextualpsychology.org/louise_hayes
_training_page
January 20, 2012

Dollinger, S. J., Leong, F. T. L., Ulicni, S.

reference

Psychology

Contextual Behavior Sciencehttp://

New Harbinger Publications.

special

Social

Hayes, L. (2011). Louise Hayes Training

using acceptance and

therapy.

and

Hayes, S. C. & Smith, S. (2005). Get out

openness

to

of your mind and into your life: The

Research

in

new

Personality, 3023-41

acceptance

and

commitment

therapy. New Harbinger Publications,

Dubinsky, A. J., Kotabe, M., Lim, C. U.,

Inc., Oakland CA.

& Wagner, W. (1997). The impact of

values on salespeoples job responses:

2008

A cross-national investigation. Journal

of Business Research, 39195-208

&

Follette, W. C., Linnerooth, P. J. N., &

Ruckstuhl,

L.

Psychology:
Analytic

E.

(2001).
clinical

Perspective.

Positive

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. G., & Wilson, K.

Behavior

G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment

Journal

of

therapy: A experimental approach to

Humanistic Psychology, 41102-134

behavior change. New York: Guilford

Ga
rling, T. (1999). Value priorities, social
value orientations and cooperation in

Press.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche,
Relational

frame

social dilemmas. British Journal of

B.

Social Psychology, 38397-408

theory: A post-Skinnerian account of

Glenn-Lawson,

J.

L.

York: Plenum Press.

(2007).

Improving diabetes self-management

(2001).

human language and cognition. New

Gregg, A. J., Callaghan, G. M., Hayes, S. C.,

&

(Eds.)

Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J. A., (2004). Values:

through acceptance, mindfulness, and

Reviving a dormant concept. Annual

values: A randomized controlled trial.

Review of Sociology, 30359-393

Journal

of

Consulting

and

Clinical

2009

Psychology, 75336-343

2235-46

lguez, M.,
Gutie
rrez, O., Luciano, C., Rodr

& Fink, B. C. (2004). Comparison

Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value

between an acceptance-based and a

orientations in the theory of action.

for

In T. Parsons, & E. A. Shils (Eds.),

coping with pain. Behavior Therapy,

Toward a general theory of action.

cognitive-control-based

protocol

- 78 -

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University

Press. pp.388-433.

8-17

Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T. S. (1954).

Montag, I., & Levin, J. (1994). The five

An empirical investigation of self-

factor personality model in applied

American

attitudes.

Psychological

Review, 1968-76
T.

(2010).

The
on

Journal

of

Personality, 1-11

Lehmiller, J. J., Law, A. T., & Tormala, T.

affirmation

European

settings.

self-

ala

prejudice.

carte ACT

effect

of

sexual

2009 ACT

Social

28105-

Lundgren, T., Dahl, J., & Melin, L. (2007).

2006

Journal

of

Experimental

110

Psychology, 46276-285
measure

values attainment and believability.

Using

the

bulls-eye

to

In J. C. Plumb (Chair), Assessment

and

2009

psychological flexibility. Symposium

Schwartz

conducted at the annual conference

of

18222-223

of

ACT

the

processes:

Values

Association

for

Behavior

Analysis, Chicago, IL. Association for

Pa
ez-Blarrina, M., Luciano, C., Gutie
rrez-

Contextual Behavior Sciencehttp://

lnez, O., Valdivia, S., Ortega, J.

Mart

contextualpsychology.org/values_bulls

&

_eye
August 10, 2012

The

lguez-Valverde,
Rodr

role

of

values

M.,

(2008a).

with personal

Levin, M. E., Hildebrandt, M., Lillis, J., &

examples in altering the functions of

Hayes, S. C. (In Press). The Impact

pain: Comparison between acceptance-

of treatment components suggested

based

by the psychological flexibility model:

protocols.

A meta-analysis of laboratory-based

Therapy, 4684-97

and

cognitive-control-based

Behaviour

Research

and

component studies. Behavior Therapy.

Pa
ez-Blarrina, M., Luciano, C., Gutie
rrez-

McMullen, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-

lnez, O., Valdivia, S., Rodr

lguez
Mart

Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., Luciano, C. &

Valverde, M., & Ortega, J. (2008b).

Cochrane,

Coping with pain in the motivational

A.

(2008).

Acceptance

versus distraction: Brief instructions,

context

metaphors, and exercises in increasing

between an acceptance-based and a

tolerance

cognitive

shocks.

for

self-delivered

Behaviour

electric

Research

values:

Comparison

control-based

protocol.

Behavior Modification, 32403-422

and

Therapy, 46122-129

of

Parks,

L.,

&

Guay,

R.

P.

(2009).

1995

Personality, values, and motivation.

Personality and Individual Differences,

4-11

47675-684

2001
QOL

Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., &

- 79 -

69-802012
Knafo,

A.

(2002).

personality

factors

The

Personality

values.

big

and

five

(2000).

personal

and

psychology:

American

An

Psychologist,

555-14

Social

Psychology Bulletin, 28789-801

Positive

introduction.

1998

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human

200621

values. New York: Free Press.

Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. (2009). Selfaffirmation and self-control: Affirming

Spencer, S. J., Fein, S. & Lomore, C. D.

core values counteracts ego depletion.

(2001). Maintaining ones self-image

Journal

vis-a
`-vis

of

Personality

and

Social

others:

The

role

of

self-

Psychology Bulletin, 96770-782

affirmation in the social evaluation of

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the

the self. Motivation and Emotion, 25

content

and

structure

of

41-65

values:

Theoretical advances and empirical

Twohig, M. P., Hayes, S. C., & Masuda, A.

tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna

(2006).

(Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social

experience

Psychology.

and

vol.25.

New

York:

Academic Press. pp.1-65.

Increasing
commitment

treatment

for

to

Acceptance

therapy

as

obsessive-compulsive

disorder. Behavior therapy, 373-13

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal

aspects in the structure and contents

willingness

obsessions:

Veage, S., Ciarrochi, J., & Heaven, P. C. L.

of human values? Journal of Social

(2011).

Issues, 5019-45

Importance,

pressure,

and

success: Dimensions of values and

Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value

their links to personality. Personality

hierarchies across cultures: Taking a

and Individual Differences, 501180-

similarities

perspective.

Journal

Cross Cultural Psychology, 32268-290

Seligman,

M.

E.

P.

(2002).

1185

of

Wegner, D. M., Schnaider, D. J., Carter, S.

R., & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical

Positive

psychology, positive prevention, and

effects

of

thought

positive therapy. In C. R. Snyder, & S.

Journal

of

Personality

J. Lopes (Eds.), Handbook of positive

Psychology, 535-13

psychology.

New

York:

Oxford

suppression.
and

Social

Wilson, K. G. (2009). Mindfulness for two:

An

University Press.
Snyder, C. R., & Lopes, S. J. (Eds.) (2002).

acceptance

and

therapy approach to mindfulness in

Handbook of positive psychology. New

psychotherapy.

York: Oxford University Press.

Harbinger Publications.

Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M.

- 80 -

commitment

Oakland

CA:

New