West Fillmore Redevelopment RFP Evaluation Panel Deliberations Summary and Scoring Scope/Scale | Financial | Consistency Prop. Qual. &| of Prop. | Return/Public | w/App. Plans | Proposed | Proposed Fin. Capacity | Development | Benefits _| & Ordinances |Business Plan] Timeline Total (0-225) (0-225) (0-200) (0-150) (0-100) (0-100) | (0-100) Concord Eastridge 190 180 140 140 50| 60] 760) [FIT & Finriore Det Partners 200 190] 160] 130] 70) 70 820 Kenilworth Neighborhood 150) 150) 100) 100) 25] 40| 565 Phoenix Fillmore Partners 220 170) 180) 115 80 20 855 Proposer’s Qualifications and Financing Capacity The Phoenix Fillmore project had the most relevant qualifications related to the Desired Project and demonstrated the highest level of financial capacity. Concord Eastridge did not provide documentation of equity and debt sources. The Kenilworth Neighborhood project lacked a clear strategy to fund all proposed development costs. Scope/Scale of Proposed Development The Fifth and Fillmore project offered the broadest scale and scope of the proposed development. Concord Eastridge had the least density excluding the affordable housing sites, which were not part of the RFP. The Phoenix Fillmore proposed development had less detail on some phases and the panel had concerns over sustainability The Kenilworth Neighborhood project lacked a clear strategy and detail. Financial Return and Public Benefits Phoenix Fillmore had the best overall financial return with the least risk. Consistency with Approved Plans and Ordinances Concord Eastridge appeared to have the greatest consistency with the City's approved Plans and Ordinances and the Desired Project.West Fillmore Redevelopment RFP Evaluation Panel Deliberations Summary and Scoring Proposed Business Plan The Phoenix Fillmore project's budget reflects market reality and offers the least risk The panel had more concern with Concord Eastridge’s and Fifth and Fillmore's reliance on for sale properties. Concord Eastridge had inconsistencies between its budget and its proforma The Kenilworth Neighborhood proposal lacked detail Proposed Timeline The panel liked The Phoenix Fillmore project's phased approach. The Fifth and Fillmore and Concord Eastridge projects are more reliant on for sale properties which could result in a longer timeline. The Kenilworth Neighborhood proposal lacked detail and had the longest timeline. Evaluation Panel Members Murray Boess Cindy Dach Christopher Kowalsky — Caroline Lobo Keon Montgomery Robyn Sahid Mark Singerman Mark Stratz i 7 ie Vn Hz