Readers Workshop Review Post Rubric

Exceeds
Expectations
5 points
Introduction

Paragraph
One

Paragraph
Two

Conventions

Includes all of the

requirements;
book title, author,
genre and rating.
Complete
paragraph; clearly
describes the
setting, thoroughly
characterizes the
main characters
and provides
details to primary
conflict(s) in the
story.
Complete
paragraph; clearly
explains the rating
of the book, gives
thorough textual
evidence to
support claims in
paragraph. Does
excellent job of
answering all three
additional
questions.
Properly cites
textual evidence
and uses proper
punctuation and
grammar
throughout entire
review.

Meets
Expectations
4 points

Below
Expectations
3-0 points

Includes most of
the introduction
requirements.

Includes little to
no introduction
requirements.

Mostly complete
paragraph;
describes the
setting,
introduces the
main characters,
and tells the
conflict(s) in the
story.

Limited to
incomplete
paragraph, little
to no mention of
the setting, main
characters and
conflict(s) in the
story.

Mostly complete
paragraph;
describes rating
of the book, gives
some textual
evidence to
support claims in
paragraph.
Answers 2-3 of
the additional
questions.
Few errors in
citations, minor
errors in
punctuation and
grammar that do
not confuse
reader.

Total

Limited to
incomplete
paragraph; little
to no mention of
rating of book,
little to no
textual evidence
to support claims
in paragraph.
Answers 1-0 of
the additional
questions.
Does not
properly cite
textual evidence.
Many errors in
grammar and
punctuation that
make review post
unclear.

Teacher Comments: _____________________________________

______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________

Total

______/20

______________________________________________________