Ethical dilemmas

1) Parable of the Sadhu:

Group 1- PRO: Halting the climb and to help the Sadhu and ensure his
safety and livelihood.
Group 2- CON: Continuing the climb as planned and providing enough
support to the Sadhu to ensure that he has enough strength.

2)Nestle
QUESTION: The managerial direction of continuing supply of the apple
juice concentrate from the same supplier after they discovered (insert
date) that it is not a pure apple juice.
Group3- PRO team will support continuing the supply of apple juice from
universal, without investigating.
Group4- CON team will support the managerial direction to stop supply of
the old concentrate and conduct investigations.

3)Why Didnt We Know

Group 5-PRO: Galavatrens should have a non-retaliation policy as part of
their ethical code in light of the whistle-blowing case at hand.
Group 6-CON: Galavatrens should NOT have a non-retaliation policy as
part of their ethical code in light of the whistle-blowing case at hand.

4)Merck Sharpe and Dohme Argentina

Group 7-PRO: Hiring the son of the high ranking government official who
does not make the intern list cutoff and hiring him the 16th candidate
instead of the deserving 15th candidate.
Group 8-CON:NOT Hiring the son of the high ranking government official
who does not make the intern list cutoff and deserving 15th candidate as
planned.

5)Enron
Group 9-Pro team: The downfall of Enron is the result of the failure of the
auditor Arthur Anderson to perform their job in a transparent and ethical
manner due to conflict of interest.
Group 10-Con Team: The downfall of Enron is not the fault of the Auditor
Arthur Anderson or to conflict of interest but rather is the fault of Enron
Management.