Adam Smith on the Human Foundation of
a Successful Liberal Society
Jerry Evensky
Introduction
Two hundred yeas of pubic acclaim have established Adam Smith’
‘sion ofa smoothly functioning market economy asthe foundation for
all subsequent classical liberal economic thought. That vision repre
tarkotsysem a8 4 mechanism through which the choices of
autonomous individuals pursing their own selF-interested ends in an
interdependent word can be coordinated so ast realize not ony the
‘est ease for the individual give his o her initial endowment but a0
the greatest posible wealth fr the nation,
This representation ofthe market system i, if you will, the super:
steycuse of Smith's moral philosophical vision. To fully understand
iat he saw i his mind's eye and ths the fl scope of his vision, one
Aust also Took closely at foundation,
The foundation of Smiths clssieal liberal vision i ethics, Smith's
‘ethical Being is one who has a proper balance of sentiments. Sent
iments ae for Smith “afetions ofthe heart” (TS, 67,92). He be
Hieved thatthe “great division of our affections i int the sli and
he henevfent™ (TUS, 267). When one's welsh and benewlent ten
iments are Falanced. such that an impartial spectator weld be io
‘sympathy with those affections hen one's heart embodies “moral sen.96 History of Poi
Economy 253 (1993)
‘iments:” Moral sntiments ate. however, aly a necessary and not a
suliient comin fr vir. Virtue requires aot ony that one know
what should be done, but that one have the sel command todo what
me's moral sntinents suggest
‘Smith set is chssical iberal analysis of markets on this ethical
Foundation becavse he recognized that only ina world of ethical beings
‘an the coordination of markets function smoothly. He believed that
where ethics al thera, trute mare of men would prevail nd tha
rare gives ise, inthe modern terminology, a rentseckng society
‘ith al its attendant destructive forces,
{All tht I describe above has ben set forth in det in earlier work
Isce Evensky 1947, 1989, 19920, 1992b). What I propose to do here is
to carey my investigation of Sith’ logic one step further Having de
scribed the sopersructue and the foundation of his lasialIiberal vi
‘on, | now examine the psychosocial basis forthe emergence ofthis
human construct: the elasial liberal commercial state
thought of entiing this piece “The Nature of Nurture in Adam
Sis Maxal Pikisopty,” becaue his sa sory" about the evolution
ff cing who, given a natural endowment of instincts, propensities,
an dispstions 6 shaped hy social processes to an end determined by
the great “Author of nature” (TMS, 166) the Deity. The clasial li
‘ral society that Smith xo cloguenly and elegantly deseribes does not
comerge folly mature Irom some convocation of wise men who St up
the maton, In Smiths view the conditions necessary for
the existence of classical ira commercial society emerge asthe na
ture of man shape by socal norms, and socal norms ae shaped by
‘material comitons
“The material conditions ofa commercial sorely, division of labor,
and exchange of srpluses through markets impose certain social re
(quirements ow individuals if that society is € funetion at all, and
freater sia ruiremens if i 1 Function ideally. The minim
moral fo
‘ttn ne ie st ot tt an
[Evenshy/ Adam Smith 397
socal requirement ofthe individual necessary forthe mere existence of
ny society i that he aere to theres of jstce, “those sacred rues
‘pon the tolerable observation of which depend the whole security and
peace of human society" (FMS, 138). All the rest of the elements of
‘itu ate embellishments that give tothe coo! regularity ofa jus 0
ety the warm affection and tranquility of a wuly good society. As
Smith writes: “The rules of justice may be compared tothe rules of
the rules of the other vitwes, 10 the tues which eis lay
inment of what is sublime and elegant in compos
tion” (MS, 173)
In part 7 of his Theory of Moral Sentiments, “Of Systems of Moral
Philosophy Consisting of Four Sections," Smith writes:
In treating of the principles of morals there are tvo questions to be
‘considered. First, where in does virtue consist? Or what the tone
‘of temper, and tenor of conduct, which constitutes the excellent and
praiseworthy character... ? And, secondly, by what power oF fc-
uly inthe mind is it, that this character, whatever it be, is recom
mended to us? Orin other words, how and by what means does i
come to pass, thatthe mind prefers one tenor of conduct to an-
cther -.. 7(7MS, 264)
In earlier work, I examined Smith's own answer tothe first of these
‘questions, the substance of virtue and his vision of the fondamental
role virtue plays inthe realization ofa classical liberal commercial so-
ety Inthe investigation that follows examine Smith's work with an
‘eye this second question: From whence virtue? In particular, Twill
{ny to represent Smith's vision as to how natural and social forces form
land shape us, and together develop the character of our being, achat
‘acter that embodies the rls we choose to live by,
belive the objective is worthwhile on two counts, Firs, it takes us
‘more deeply into Smith's system of thought by examining the natural
And socal forces that he believed shape the ethical foursaton of his
classical liberal vision. Second, it provides food foe thought about ma
ture and nurture in our own society. If, as seems to be the case for
‘much of the world including stats that were only recently under the
sip of central contol, we Seek to form our states andl world in the
mage ofthe Smithian classical liberal dea, then we must have some
notion about rom whence comes the moral foundation ofthe world we
feck to create. As willbe demonstrated, Smith's own story places @9A Mistry of Peal Beanany 25: (1998)
reat emphasis on education and personal ole models, I we find merit
In his representation ofthe process of character building, i has impli
Cations forthe way we Bui aur wn society
“The Necessary and Sulficent Psychological
Hardware of 1 Being Suited for
1 Classical Liberal Commerc
ocely
Smith saw the material of Being as ike ela. In its raw Gnfant) state,
‘we are each unformed: the expression of a being has no shape. Em
Fried in that clay are certain properties and these properties ae eo
‘mon to all teings, with sight variation. Unlike cla, however, the
Iwopertics ofa human being are active. We are shaped by the forces
within ws that are stimulated by cur oxperience. The dilferences among
sate determined no by the nature of our boing, for we all share very
similar properties, hut by how the ie we lead shapes the material of
tue being. Sith writes im The Wealth of Nvions that
“The ference of natural talents in diferent men isin realty, much
less than we are aware of: and the very different genivs which ap-
Pear to distingush men of diferent professions, when grown upto
maturity is not upon many occasions <0 much the cause, asthe ef.
fect of the division of labour. The diference between the mos is
Sinvlar characters, hetween a philosopher and a common set
Pores, for example, seems to aise not 0 mich from nature, a ron
habit, custom, and edvcation.(1976b, 28-29)"
‘The properties of our being. or as Smit refers to them, the “charac
Ieistical qualities of human nature” (TMS, 28), that ave pact of our
‘tural endowment include our sentiments and ur capacity to fel
syanpaty. Sentiments ae a capacity to feet an array of passions that
Smith categorizes as: bwily (ike hunger), asoial (Smith calls them
selish” and inclaes grief and joy) unsocil (hared and resentmen),
fr social (including generosity and Kindness). Sympathy "our
fellow-fccting with any passion whatever” (TMS, 10) These elements
‘our natural psychic endowment are necessary for our judgement of
‘ites oF of ourselves, for such judgement is based on the degree 0
hich we are in sympathy withthe sentiments that motivate an action.
tes ene ee es ol eS es
Evenhy / Adam Smith 399
But this is only part of the human psychic hardware necessary for
judgement. Judgement requires standards, 9 we mst be endowed
‘with some internal system of standard determination. In Sonith’s
‘model of beng, personal standard are determined by interpersonal ex-
perience. Society provides us with a frame of reference:
‘Were it possible tata human creatare could grow up to manhood in
some slitary place, without any communication with his own spe-
cies, he could no more think of his own characte, oF the propriety
‘or demerit of his own sentiments and condac, of the beauty oF de-
formity of hs own mind, than of the beauty or deformity of his own
face, All hese ate objets which he cannot easly see, which natu
rally he does not look at, and with regard to which be is provided
‘wth no mirror which ean preset them to his view. Bring him into
fociety and he is immeditely provided withthe mitror which he
wanted before (TMS, 110)
the try is incomplete, While method of jadgement and ref
erence point foe judgement are necessary for judgement t0 be exer
‘sed, the former ean be implemented only ifthe later is internalize.
Im order for Smith to complete his model of human nature, the psyches
‘ofthe beings he poss must have some element in their characters that
takes the external societal standard a reference pont that these ind
‘idl Beings find compeling. The lst element of Smith's being that,
is necessary and, together with thse listed above, sliciet for so
cially referenced individual judgment isan inherent attachment the
standards of society. On this Smith writes:
Nature, when she formed man of society, endowed hien with an org
inal desire to please, and an original aversion to offend his beth
ren, » She fendered their approbation most flattering and most
grecable to him for its own sake; and their dsapprobation most
‘mortifying and most offensive. (TMS, 116)"
‘This natural disposition to accommodate and to assimilate, as
rch af we ean our own sentiments, principles, and fesings, (0
those which we see fixed and rooted inthe persons whom we are
‘obliged to live and converse a great deal with, i the cause of the
‘contagious eflets of both good and bad company, (7MS. 224)
4. ther, Si ws, °Man tly dees, mt ny oe tes
reuters we oe dpe
etter400 Hisry of Political Ezonomy 25:3 (193)
‘The desire to be connected to society makes the available standards of
society personally compelling, This, combined withthe ability to make
judgements based en "Sens aa fecling” (TMS, 320), gives the Sith-
Jan being the capacity for judgement based on the standards to which
he ie socialized
‘Bu sll this isnot slcient for vet. Knowing virtue and doing
Virtue are two diferent things. Foe Siith’s beng to have the potential
to act virtuous he not ony has to ave the necessary and sufficient
psychic equipment to adopt viwous standatds, he fas to have the ca
pacity for commitment to those standards. n Smith's language, a being
's no capable of victuous action if he lacks the capacity to lear sll
command. An s0 Smith endows his being with such a capacity.
This then i the fully endowed Smithian being. He his the “hard
wired" capacity ty make and to aet on judgements based on socially
defined valves. Bu al this still nt sulficent forthe emergence of &
being who has the exact kind of virtue suitable fora classical liberal
commercial society. The emergence of sich a being sequies tha the
society ts establish those standards. Only then can the individual be
ing inculeate those standards and the self command to follow them,
‘There is nothing inthe individal natural capacities desribed above
‘hat insures that any given individ being or any particular society of
tongs will achieve ths. So Smith faces another question: How do we
et from here (wherever here i) to there (that ical classical ber
Sate of individual and society)?
“To accomplish this, he desribes two dierent, bt elated, evolution-
ary processes: one at a social evel and one a am individual evel, In the
next section, I will rely deseribe th social evolution of values, and
inthe fourth section, I wil deere in detail how the extant soca
tes are inculeated int individual members of society as they person-
ally vole,
The
ion of Socal Values
‘The souree of the standards that indivials internalize is society, and
those standards change with the evolution of society. Smith envisions
society, and thus the standards, a evolving through stages fom the
rune hunting-and-gatherng condition to the fully mature classical lib
eral commercial society. Inthe course ofthis proces,
Evenshy /Adam Smith 401
Every age and country look upon that degree of each quality which
‘iscommonly fo be met with in those who are esteemed among them
selves asthe golden mean ofthat particular talent or vetwe. And 38
according a thei diferent circumstances render difer-
tes more a less habitual to them their sentiments concer
Jing the exact propriety of character and behavior vary accordingly.
crs, 204)
‘The moral and material conditions of society must be in harmony ithe
society is to maintain order, $0 these two social dimensions coevolve,
‘As Smith writes, "in general, the style of manners which takes place
in any nation, may commoaly upon the whole be sid tobe that which
‘is most suitable to it situation” (TMS, 209).
‘The fundamental virtues required fora classical iberal commercial
society ate prodence, justice, and benficence. The first of these ree-
fommends tous 2 "concern for cur own happiness," ad the second two
recommend to us a “concen for that of other people... he one re-
strains vs from hurting. the other prompts us to promote that hapoi-
ness” (TMS, 262). The ideal being ofa classical eral society has the
‘perfect balance ofthese values and the slf-cominand to fllow them,
But, a8 Smith recognizes:
‘The coarse clay of which the bulk of mankind are Formed, cannot be
‘wrought up 0 such perfection. There is scarce any man, however,
who by discipline, edocaion, and example, may nt be so impressed
with aegard to genera ules, 28 to act upon almost every occasion
with tolerable decency, and tough the whole of his life avoid any
considerable degree of blame. (TMS, 162-63)
‘The Incolcaton of Social Values in
‘the Individuat
By “discipline, edveation, and example” individuals are “impressed
with a regard to general rules” In this ection I will examine how, 26
cording to Smith, each of these impresses social values on’ the
individ,
‘The greater part of Smith's career was devoted to education and, a
particular, ethics education, so his views on how edweation shapes in
Aividual ethics are well developed. According to Srnith, the time (0402 Misory of Poitca Economy 25:3 0993)
stat etiesedveation i early and the pce to starts at home, child
isthe perfect student for lessos of eis, because properly “dressed
and adorned”
its preceps are capable of producing upon the Nexibilty of
youth," te noblest and most lasting impression, and 3s they fin
‘vith the natural mapnaniity ofthat generous age, they are able to
inspire, fora time atleast, the most heroic resolutions, and ths tend
both to establish and confirm the best and most ssf habits of
hich the mind of ra i susceptible, (TMS, 329)
The place to hegin is at home Because one’s moral education should
tegin with “domestic morals: be rspectul of your parents, be kind
‘o your siblings. What beter place to lear these basic ethical stan
shards than at home ce THS, 222), for there one isn the context of
the lesson te Iestned, ad there ome desires more than anywhere ese
tebe approved of and to Belong
Self-command, on the other hand, is a lesson in vietue that, in
Smiths view. is most likely learaed ance one has ef the safe haven
oh
‘A very young child has no self.command . {and it is unikely to
‘equi same] wile it remains unde the eustdy of such patil pro:
tectors [as patents)... When it old enough to go to school,
to mix with ts equ, it soon finds that they have no such indulgent
porilty. I naturally wishes to gain tei favour, and 1 aod heir
hatred contempt, Regard even tots own safety Teaches it t0 do 0;
and it soon finds that ican Jo so in no other way than by moder
ating, not ony its anger, but all its other pasion, 40 the degree
hich its pla-fllows and companions ate key to be pleased with
Te us enters into the great school of Sel command. (74S, 145)
In both of these carly lestons in virte, domestic morals and self
command, we sce the crucial connection between the psychic hard-
‘rae, in this case the desire for approval, and the social lesson to be
learned the principles of virtue. Is the former that motivate thei
Lividual to inculeate the ater.
vensy / Adam Smith 403,
{As students get older the process of education becomes more com.
plex because young adults acquite both a skepticism abou the values
(of society, and teason. Thee skepticism expresses itself, according 10
‘Smith, through a rejection of society's assertion that certain valves are
naturally (.e.,a priori) good and worthy of respec: "We Fequently
hear the young and the lcentious ridiculing the most sacred rules of
‘morality... Upon this account we generally cast about fr other a
‘uments, andthe consideration which frst occurs tous, isthe disorder
and confusion of society which would result fom the universal prev
alence of such practices” (TMS, 89).
‘Thus we use the capacity for reason that these young people have
mastered to persuade them of the ull of the rules of ethics that,
wwe seck to have them adopt.” The heuristic is diferent but, as with the
‘yung child, the motive we exploit in our atempt to teach Virtue is
‘the basi human desire for approbation from a respected instructor and
the admiration of one's fellows
[Not surprisingly, given his career and his classical liberal vision,
Smith Sw education as a fundamental social imperative, Even “the
‘most vulgar education teaches us to act, upon all important occ
‘sons, with some sort of impartiality between ourselves and others”
TMs, 139),
Bat, wile education is an important part of Smith's representation
ofthe process through which social values get disseminated among and
‘nculeated into the individuals ofa society, he recognized that there ae
tater fores at work onthe psyches of individuals that also influenced
their development
Tite quotation cited at the beginning of this section, Smith speaks
‘of “scpline, education, and example” (emphasis added) as molding
the coarse ela ofthe unformed individual ito a social bing, lvca-
tion exposes one 10 examples ot role model, and these models nfs
1, Sth ty ne mantle og
‘Wit mam dene tah oath easy te ber tat te Deity ee om oe
ty otc Tecan nme ease ugh es ae pre ht
Synch ec en nt
‘isch iy her mean waged Te a404 History of PoitielFconomy 25:3 1999)
fence one's development. But there are many models outside of
‘education, and Seth expicily ecopnizes this in his analyse of moral
evelopment. In Saih’s view, modeling i a powerful socialization
tool. He inl believes hat we become like the company we Keep and
the leaders we follow Obviously the best company to Keep is “relly
{ned company” whieh includes, according to Smith, those who prac:
tice “justice, modesty, humanity, and goes! order" (TMS, 200). Such
company would encotraze one to develop ke qualities and thas one
willbe "shocked with whatever seems to e inconsistent with the rues
‘which those virus prescribe" (FAS, 200). The power that that com-
fray has overs derives from our own psychic desire foe the appro
bution of those who mater tous,
Similarly. leaders set an example. “The servant who shapes his
work accorlng to the patlern which his master preseribes for him, wil
shape his ie ton aceon to the example which he set him” (1976,
612). The masters claim Westen as a model ress on his accomplish
‘ments asa man ofthe world, but he has no higher claim. Not so the
religious man who “never ets deliberately bata in the presence of
that Great Superior who is finaly 10 recompense aceoeding 1 his
deeds. A greater trust is posed, upon this account, inthe regularity
an exaciness of his decd” (TMS, 170), And she stands a special
foe mel for al flow
‘Accosing to Smith, the primary power ofa role model derives fromm
the payehic hones an costs astclted, respectively, with aeepting
lor rejecting the model. From a group one receives the following sig
nals If yon become like us, you wil heme ne of 8, ye wil be
Joag: and if you become a model ofthe behavioe we admire, we wil
saimire you, Conversely, if you do nt choose tobe like us, 0 wil ot
be accepted among us, you wil be rejected (See TMS, 88), From a
Feader one eecives signal that says: Ifyou follow my Tea, you wil
have acess tothe benefits Lam ina postion to bestow, be they worldly
{fame or subsistence) otherworldly (acces to heaven); bt turn away
and you willbe denied. The more significant the benetileost, the
‘more powesfal the atacton/sanction of the model, and thus the more
Tikely it isto be accepted
Example shapes us, education shapes us, and so foo, according to
Smith, “seine” shapes us. By aseipline, Smith has in mind pic
‘arly dhose dificult challenges of life that, as the expression goes,
build eharacter. The particular clement ofan individual's nator psy
vensky / Adam Smith 405,
chic endowment that Smith feels is enhanced by discipline isthe ea
pacity for se-command. “Hardships, dangers, injuries, misfortunes
ae the only masters under whom we can learn the exeris of thi vir-
tue" (TMS, 153). But even this virtue, which we can best learn frm
‘that nonhuman master, experience, i best earned in a seting in which
‘our excellence is socially recognized and appreciated.
For example, Smith was fascinated with what he perceived to be the
behavior of the “savages of North America” to whom he ascribed a
superhuman selécommand: 4 "heroic and unconguerable firmness
Which the custom and education of his country demand” (TMS, 207;
‘emphasis added). Again, we find Smith describing social references a¢
irectng the fores of our psychic endowment and thus shaping cur
character,
Smith's savage is acting according toa “golden mean” determined
bythe circumstances of his society (TMS, 208). The “golden mean” of
his worlds not, however, an appropriate stndard for clasial liberal
commercial society. The process of the development of the human
characer isthe same—nature and nurture act together to deine our
being-—but the standards vary wit the variation in the czcumstances
ofthe society (TMS, 209). A classical liberal commercial society does
‘not require sich superhuman selfcommand. Rater, it requires an in-
dividual who has suficient self-command to act with a proper (ie.
socially define’) balance of prudence, justice, and beneficence. As
With the courageous savage, such a person does nt emerge from the
‘womb fully developed. Wit proper “disepline, education, and exam
Plone grows into the role
“The truly excellent person grows though socal referencing, bu ul-
timatly anscends the immediate reference of his current situation in
‘wo ways. Fist, one's Tocus of contol shifts from external internal
asone develops slfcommand.” Second, one’s sia reference for val
‘es tums from one’ immediate associates toward a more dependable,
‘ximirable, and truly social reference: “those genera rules of conduct”
“formed, when they are universally acknowledged and established, by
“hance ea nme rene the mnie ee” CS. empha
‘nema be eterna oe” hhe eh pm ho, wees ma ro
‘rahul Sih te mre ops fr coulis406 Hisory of Patti
eonomy 25:3 (1993)
‘he concurring semiments of mankind” (TMS, 161, 160), The inivid-
ual who lives by these standatdsdesites more tobe peiseworthy than
to be praised, and abhors blameworthiness more than blame (TMS,
117,119, Sul native and murture are working in concert, but naw at
airent level The motivator is til he psychic endowment of nate
andthe reference remains socal, but now itis socal in the largest
sense fr i is "the concurring Scatiments of mankind” that represent
‘the standards. This ideal Being, socialized by nature, has inculated a
‘of vales that alow his judgement to transcend the immediate pres
‘sites of society. He i at one and the same time both a social and an
tutonomous being.
Socialization of Values, Sophistry, and
Smith's Solutions
Everyone wil be socialized iat a set of values that ate socially refer
fenced, ut what ante i there tha this process will converge on 8
eof wales that is consistent with the necessary and slcient con
ions for an adnable classical liberal commercial society? The
‘problem for society, according to Smith, les in separating the wheat
from the cha: Men with selfish motives will seek to shape the social
ryche to sit their wn ends How does society protect isl from
such deception? Two particular cases were of special concern to
‘Smith, One was the clergy.
Smith recognized that models can be good or bad. He sems to be
particularly concerned about the impoct of religious models. For rea-
Sons cited above, these are particularly compelling models. Bu, with
rare exception eg. the presbyterian ministry [1976b, 810). the poper
‘model ofa clergyman (TMS, 202) is not the one to which, Smith et,
‘en were generally exposed, He saw much of the clergy’ 8 prone 10
superstition, fanaticism, and enthusiasm. For Smith this was policy
fsse. He argues that a plethora of smal esi to be prefered to an
‘lgopotistie or monopolistic religious envionment. state teli-
tion), He believed that competition among small sects would “in ime
‘Probably reduce the doctrine of the greater part of them tothe pure and
‘ational religion” and would oblige their leaders to practice “can
and mexleration™ (19766, 793). Furthermore, “litle religious sect
(796), by patting members close 1 the move oftheir Leader, would
serve asa social reference point for those lacking anyother such frame:
‘venshy /Adam Smith 407
work, Without this, an isolated individual s “sunk into obscurity and