Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis of Arrester Energy for 132kV Overhead Transmission Line Due to Back Flashover and Shielding Failure مهم
Analysis of Arrester Energy for 132kV Overhead Transmission Line Due to Back Flashover and Shielding Failure مهم
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2
UM Power Energy Dedicated Advanced Center (UMPEDAC), Level 4, Wisma R&D, University of Malaya,
Jalan Pantai Baharu, 59990 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
a
hidayahassan@siswa.um.edu.my, b a.halim@um.edu.my
dependent model, which is represented with IEEE two sections
of nonlinear resistance. Since the Maximum Continuous
Operating Voltage (MCOV) of 132 kV transmission line is
97.2 kV, RVLQD - Class 2 type of arrester has been chosen
because the rated voltage is between 3kV to 198kV as in the
datasheet of porcelain type surge arrester from Toshiba.
I.
Shielding
II.
Failure;
INTRODUCTION
MODELLING
683
(1)
2012 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy (PECon), 2-5 December 2012, Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Malaysia
where,
(2)
10 [pF]
T
T1s2
G2
T
T1s3
T
T1s6
ravg
T
T1s1
T
T1s4
10 [pF]
ravg =
r1h1 + r2 h + r3 h2
G1
T
T1s7
T
T1s9
B
10 [pF]
T
T1s10
T
T1s12
10[ohm]
Vo = 0.9(400 +
710
t
0.75
)d
(3)
where,
Vo
t
d
= flashover voltage, kV
= time elapsed after lightning stroke, s [8, 9]
= length of gap between arc horn, m
Crossarm
S
Conductor
TABLE I.
ARRESTER CHARACTERISTICS
Nominal voltage(kV)
MCOV(kV rms)
Voltage(kV) for 10 kA, 8/20s
Energy absorption(kJ/kV)
Length of arrester column(m)
No. of parallel column of disks
684
120
97.2
330
4.5
1.485
1
2012 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy (PECon), 2-5 December 2012, Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Malaysia
III.
LIGHTNING
I
tr = rise time
th = tail/half time
Ipeak
Ipeak/2
Figure 5: IEEE frequency-dependent model line arrester
2.3
Voltage, V (p.u)
th
tr
2.1
t (s)
1.9
1.7
1.5
1.3
A0
1.1
A1
T3A1
TIME
0.9
0.01
4
8
Current, I (kA)
12
16
400[ohm]
Istroke
Table
20
L1 = 15d / n
TABLE II.
(4)
R1 = 65d / n ()
(5)
Lo = 0.2d / n (H)
(6)
Ro = 100d / n ()
(7)
C = 100n / d (pF)
(8)
where,
d= estimated height of the arrester (as in data sheet), m
685
2012 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy (PECon), 2-5 December 2012, Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Malaysia
IV.
ARRESTER ENERGY
(9)
800
where,
600
= arrester current, A
400
200
y
iA
eA
VA1
0
-200
=
where,
-400
-600
Zg
Ts
Ri
0.00
(10)
0.05m
0.10m
0.15m
0.20m
0.25m
0.30m
Zg
Ri
Ts
= footing resistance,
WA =
i e dt
0
A A
(11)
Figure 10: A0 energy waveform for 20 kA stroke to the ground wire
i A = k (e A )
(12)
WA =
K 1 Ie A1 1
1+1
(13)
where EA1 are the discharge voltage for current of KII and is
-t / 1 . Detailed derivation of both equations is explained in [1].
V.
686
2012 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy (PECon), 2-5 December 2012, Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Malaysia
Stroke
Current (kA)
35
80
100
150
180
200
Calculated Energy
(kJ/kV)
0.06
0.15
0.25
0.50
0.65
0.76
Simulated Energy
(kJ/kV)
0.07
0.24
0.31
0.52
0.64
0.73
Figure 17: Simulated energy discharged by the line arrester for shielding
failures
687
2012 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy (PECon), 2-5 December 2012, Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Malaysia
Stroke
Current (kA)
5
10
13
15
18
20
Calculated Energy
(kJ/kV)
0.80
1.92
2.61
3.08
3.78
4.28
Simulated Energy
(kJ/kV)
0.91
1.97
2.65
2.96
3.67
4.16
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The author thanks the University of Malaya for
supporting this work through the IPPP research grant (Grant
no: PS012-2012A).
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
Rf,
10
20
30
40
50
60
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
Energy, kJ/kV
Curent 200 kA at ground
Current 18 kA at phase A
wire (Back flashover)
(Shielding Failure)
0.7296
3.67
0.7353
3.67
0.7390
3.67
0.7417
3.67
0.7454
3.67
0.7530
3.67
VI.
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
CONCLUSION
[14]
688