Stanford (1971) .

:

2007

 , Stanford . .

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you
commit atrocities
VOLTAIRE

 , Stanford . .

STANFORD
1.1
7
1.2. 11
1.3 ...14

H ANA
2.1
2.1.1 ...18
2.1.2 .24
2.1.3 .26
2.1.4 .30
2.2
2.2.1 ..35
2.2.2 .43
( Stanford .)
( - )
2.3 .
2.3.1 .52
2.3.2 : ...55
2.3.3 -
..58

 , Stanford . .

2.3.4 - ..62

STANFORD

3.1 .
...82
3.2 Stanford 98
: .
bu Ghraib...103

110

126

 , Stanford . .

Stanford

.
,
.
1971 Philip Zimbardo,
Stanford
.
,
,
,

, .

,
.


Zimbardo,

 , Stanford . .

.
,

,

.
,
,
.
,
,
.


.

,

.

( )
.

(Foucault, Goffman).
,

 , Stanford . .

. ,



Abu Ghraib.

.
,
.

, , , , , .

 , Stanford . .

STANFORD

1.1

,
, ,
,
. 1

,
.
.
1

K, .(1994):, , ,
, .. , , .17.

 , Stanford . .

,
.

,

. 2

, (
, ),
(
)
,

.

,
, . 3

,
,
. 1960


.
2

, (2002). , ,
, .47
3
. 48

 , Stanford . .

.


(. )

(Sykes, Clemmer, Wheeler).
(
Irwin, Cressey) 4 .
50
70 , ,
.
,
,
,
Erving Goffman, Michel Foucault Thomas Szasz
.
60,

.

. 5

, .(1994):
: ,
, , .. , 41-2.
5
, (1999).
, , , .296-7

 , Stanford . .

70,
nothing
works.

-
.


.

: )

. 6
Stanford,
.
,

.
70 imbardo
Stanford ,

( ).
,
,
.
, ,

, . (2004). , , , .270

10

 , Stanford . .

.
,
,
. 7

,
. 8

1.2.

( )

.
imbardo
,

May J.P. Building violence, how Americas rush to incarcerate creates more violence, Sage, .107-8
Zimbardo, P.G. (2004). A situationist perspective on the psychology of evil: understansting how good
people are transformed into perpetrators, in A.G.Miller.The social psychology of good and evil, Guilford
Press, .21-22
8

11

 , Stanford . .

,
. 9
,

( ),
. ,
,
,
, ,
.
,
,
.
,
:
( ),
(, , ...)
.
,
( ),

http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

12

 , Stanford . .

(
) . 10
imbardo ,
,
-. ,
( ),

. 11
, , , , ,
, , ,
. ,
,
(, , ,
),
,
,
( , , )
. 12
,

. (
) , imbardo
,
10

.. Zimbardo (2004) : 39
, .. (2005). , , , .121-2

11

12

.. Zimbardo (2004 ) . 18-20

13

 , Stanford . .

.

,
.

. 13

,
, .

1.3

15$ (76 $
2006),
. ,

,
.
, .
13

Zimbardo, P.G.& Maslach.C.& Haney C.(2000). Reflections on the Stanford Prison Experiment:
Genesis, transformations, consequences. : T.Blass Obedience to Authority: Current perspectives on
the Milgram paradigm, Mahwah, N.J. Erlbaum, 195-8 Zimbardo (2004) . 21

14

 , Stanford . .

( ).
( )
,
. 14
,

.
. ,

Palo Alto( )

. ,

. ,

(, ,
...).
,
.
. ,

,
. .
14

Zimbardo, P.G., Haney C.Banks,W.C. & Jaffe D. (1973). The mind is a formidable jailer: a
pirandellian prison. The New York Times Magazine, 6, .72-3 Zimbardo P.G.& Maslach.C.&
Haney C.2000, . 5-16

15

 , Stanford . .

Zimbardo (o o ),
.


. , ,

.
Stanford .
,

. ,
,
. 15 .
O ,
.
.
.
,
.

. , ,
,
.

15

http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

16

 , Stanford . .

. ,
,

. 16

.
(
).
, , ,
. ,
( ) .
,
. 17
.

16

Haney C.Banks W.C. & imbardo P.G. (1973), . 81-82 Zimbardo P.G.& Maslach.C.& Haney
C.2000:195-8
17
Zimbardo, P.G.(1971). The power and pathology of imprisonment. Congressional Record. Hearings
before Subcommittee No 3, of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-Second
Congress, First Session on Corrections, Part II, prisons, prison reform and prisoner rights. Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 15 .111.

17

 , Stanford . .

H ANA

2.1
-2.1.1.

, .
, , ,
.. , ,
- , ,
.. 18

.
Catch - all Concept, .
(real) (fictive).

.
.
, , ,
,
(.. )
18

, .(2003). , , , .27.

18

 , Stanford . .

.
,
.

,
.
.
: ) ,
, )
, , ,
) .
Galtung (1975)
, ,
.
, ,
. ,
Galtung , ,

.
. 19

, ,
. ,
,
19

, . (1999).
, , , .61-2.

19

 , Stanford . .

- ,
.
.

, .(T.P.Thorton).

,
.
( )
( ) . 20
H ,
( Engels). ,

.
,
,
. 21
rx ,
, .
,
, Marx ,
,

20

1969 :1 . , .. (1969). .
,.1,
S.Wolin Ch.Johnson.
21

rendt, H.(2000). , -: - , ,
, .66.

20

 , Stanford . .

.

.
, , . 22

,
. 23 H
-

. ,
, , , ,
.
( ) (
).
. .
. 24
,


. ,
Wright Mills,
Weber
, , .

22

. 74
... 27
24
(1969), . 6-7
23

21

 , Stanford . .

arx
. 25
,
, .
Jouvenel

. Voltaire,
,
, Weber,
Clauzewitz
. 26

,
. Jhn Stuart. Mill,
,
,
. ,
,
,
, ,
.
(how fit he is to sway /that can so well obey), :
.
Jhn.
25
26

rendt (2000),. 95
. 96

22

 , Stanford . .

Stuart Mill, . ,

. 27

,
.
,
. 28
.

,

. ,
,
.
. .
, , .
, ,
.
,
.
. 29
, .
Ghandi
27

... 99
.. . 101 112
29
... 115 118
28

23

 , Stanford . .

- Stalin,
Hitler, ,
, . 30

-2.1.2

,

;

.
Lorenz,
.
.

.
( ),

30

.. .115

24

 , Stanford . .

.
.
Lorenz,
,

.
. ,
, . ,

.

Freud Lorenz. ,
,
. . ,

. 31
,


. ,
-
, . 32

31

- . (2003). ,
, . . , , , .229
32
, .(1980). , .
- , .., .4-15

25

 , Stanford . .

Arendt
,
, ,

.
.
,
(group territorialism),
, ,

,
( , )
; 33

2.1.3

. :
( )

. , Freud,
:

33

.. rendt (2000), . 119-20

26

 , Stanford . .

(libido) .

: () ,

. ,

, .
,
,
.
,
frustration-agression (/ ) frustration
. 34
-
J. Dollard .


.
, .
,
, ,
. Adorno

34

.. (1980), .27-8

27

 , Stanford . .

. 35

Dollard 1939,
(
)
(frustration).

. 36
.
, . Berkowitz,
( ,)

. ,
,
. 37

( ),
Tedeschi,
,
. ,
.
Tedeschi

35

.. - (2003), . 233
.. (1999), . 68
37
.. - (2003), . 234
36

28

 , Stanford . .

Toch
. 38


. ,

.

,
.
, ,
,
. ,
.
. (
,
) 39 .
Arendt .

, .
,
- , -
, ,
. ..
38
39

. 239
.. rendt (2000), . 121

29

 , Stanford . .

,
.
Arendt

. 40

- 2.1.4 -

,
.
,
.

,
.
,
.

.

40

. 124

30

 , Stanford . .

,
.
,
.
.

, .
-
Albert Bandura Richard Walters

. Bandura,
,
,
(
) . ,
,
.

,
.
,
. 41

.

41

.. (1999), . 73

31

 , Stanford . .

, .

.
,
.

,
,
.
: . 42
O Bandura
. ,
,

.


. ,
,
,
,

.
andura

42

. 74

32

 , Stanford . .

: , , ,
.
Bandura,
,
. ,
,

,
. ,
, ,
,

. ,

.
Bandura,
. 43
Bandura
, . Stanford.
.

: ,

:

43

- (2003), .241

33

 , Stanford . .

.

. .
(416)
..
.
: .
.
:


.. ,
.
. .
. ,
.
,
( )
(
,
). , ,

. 44

44

.261

34

 , Stanford . .

2.2.

2.2.1.

: ) )
)
, )
. 45

.
. ,

-( ,
-) ,
. Megargee,

.

( )
, ,
, .

(Toch & Adams),
45

, ..(1986). , : , 2, .19

35

 , Stanford . .

. David Cooke,


.
: )

, )

)
)

. 46

( ),

. ,

: ) ) ) .
,(deprivation model)
(Gffman). To

(Sykes). ,
Sykes, , ,
, .
46

Cooke, D.J.(1991). Violence in prisons: the influence of regime factors. The Howard Journal, 30, 98-9.

36

 , Stanford . .

,

. , ,
.

, ,
. 47

, .
,
( ) ,
.

, , ,

, -
.
Stokols
(crowding)

.
,
(spatial)

47

Fisher Giorlando, M & Jiang, S.(2002). Inmate misconduct: a test of the deprivation, importation and
situational models.The Prison Journal, 82, 338-9
Sykes & Messinger: The inmate social system 1960 Wright: A study of individual, environmental and
interactive effects in explaining adjustment to prison 1991

37

 , Stanford . .

( )
)

.
,
. Freedman
,
,
.
.
,
(


Bowker). 48

: )

)
-

,

48

Tartaro, C.(2002). The impact of density on jail violence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, .500-1.

38

 , Stanford . .

. 49

.
Dilulio (
, )
) ,

)

)
.
,
: )
)
.
,
,
. 50
A, (importation
model) (-) .


49

Franklin, T.W.& Franklin, C.A.& Pratt T.C. (2006), Examining the empirical relationship between
prison crowding and inmate misconduct: a meta-analysis of conflicting research results. Journal of
Criminal Justice, 34, 401-8.
50

.. . 403-8

39

 , Stanford . .

( Irwin, Cressey). ,
,
.

,
, .
,
. 51

(not-so-total institution)
Farrington Goffman . 52

,

, . , Goffman,
,
,
. Farrington

(somewhat less than total)

Goffman. 53

51

Fisher Giorlando, M & Jiang S.(2002), .339

Irwin Sociological studies of the impact of longterm confinement 1981, Irwin &
Cressey Thieves, Convicts, and the inmate Culture 1962, Bonta &Gendreau Re-examining the cruel and
unusual punishment of prison life1990, Toch Living in prison the ecology and survival 1977
52
Farrington, K.(1992).The modern prison as total institution ? Public perception versus objective reality.
Crime & Deliquency, 1,.6-26.
53

Fisher Giorlando, M & Jiang S.(2002) .355 .3

40

 , Stanford . .

,
. ,
(situational model),

.
,
, ,
,
.
: ,
. 54
To
: ) , ,
, ,
, ) , ,
, , , ,
, ,
. ,

, ,
: ) , ,
, )

54

.. . 340 , Goodstein & Wright Inmate adjustment to prison 1989,

Paterline & Petersen Structural and social psychological determinants of prisonization1999, Flanagan
Correlates of institutional misconduct among state prisoners 1983.

41

 , Stanford . .

,
. 55
1991,

,


. 1991
McCorkle

.

,

(Paterline & Petersen),
(Harer & Steffensmeier), Cao

, Patrick



.. 56
,
,
. (
) ,
55
56

.340.
... 342

42

 , Stanford . .

(), , , ,
. ,

,

.
. 57

2.2.2

,
. imbardo

: ,
.

57

... 352

43

 , Stanford . .

,
.
,
,
. ,
Goffman.

. 58

, , , ,

( , )
,

.
. 59

.

(privacy).
, .
.
.

58
59

(2002), . 49
.. . 49

44

 , Stanford . .

.

, ,
. 60

.

. 61

. ,
, ,
,
. ,

authority

agency .
()
. ,

. 62

60

, . (1998), .
, 11, /, . .. , .189
61
, . (1994). , , , .218.
62

, . (2004). . , ,
.324-5.

45

 , Stanford . .

Stanford .
- .
,
,
, ,
,.. ,
63
. 64
,
, ,
,
, , ,
. 65
,
.

(space
clusters) .

.
.
,

. ,

63

, .(1976/1989). , . ., .
, , , .155 173.
64
.. .188
65
, .194 196

46

 , Stanford . .

,
(, )
. 66

,
, .

.

,
.


.
, .
18 entham
,
,
.

-
. 67

66

, .(2002). , , ..,
.14
67
. (2003). (
), , , .20-1.

47

 , Stanford . .

.

,
, ,
. R.D.Laing, ,
,
() , .
Divided Self ( ) :

, ,
,
.
.
,
, .
. 68
,

. ,
,
.
,
,
68

1996: 204 , .(1996). . , ,

, .204.

48

 , Stanford . .

.
,
. 69

.

.

.
.
, . 70
-
, ,
,
-
. (
), ,
, ( ),
,

. ,
. 71
.

69
70
71

(2003) .23-4
.. . 165
(2002), .52

49

 , Stanford . .

. 1995 Bureau of Justice statistics

40.000
4%
. 1994,
0,7 % . 72
,
,
.

.
. , ( )
,
.

.
,
,
. 73

.
. ,
,

72

73

May J.P.108
(2003),.48-9

50

 , Stanford . .

,
. 74

,
, , , ,
. .
,
, . 75
.
Foucault
.
.
,

.

. 76

74

, A. (2006),
: , : . (.) , , ,
.207
75
(2003), .174
76
, . (1999), , , .
. , , , .94.

51

 , Stanford . .

2.3 .

2.3.1 : versus

.
,
,
.
.

status,
.

. ,

,

Stanford. ,
,
(

52

 , Stanford . .

):
. 77
.

,

,
.

. ,
, .
.
. 78
,

.
.
.

.
,
. ,
,
77

Zimbardo, P.G.& Johnson R.L.&Weber A.L. (2000). Psychology, 3rd Ed., Allyn & Bacon A Pearson
Education Company, .458-9
78

(2003), .35
: , ,
, ... .

53

 , Stanford . .

Seligman & Grove. 79

.
.
Seligman

.
,
,
.
,
.
, Bandura

. 80


by stander Zimbardo:


, .

.
,

79

Haney, C.Banks W.C. & imbardo P.G. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. dynamics
in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1., 69-97.

80

- (2003), . 275

54

 , Stanford . .

.
,
.


, .
, Pirandello
,
. 81

2.3.2

, (
).


.

(Poprporino, Doherty &

Sawatsky), (Lockwood), (Adams)

(dgar &ODonnell),
81

Zimbardo (1971) .113 Zimbardo

55

 , Stanford . .

.
,
.
Killias, : )
, )
) . 82 O
, :
83

dgar & ODonnell, ,
, .
, , ,
-
.

. 84

,
,
,
. ,
: , ,
, . ,
82

ODonnel, I.& Edgar K.(1999). Fear in prison. The Prison Journal, 79, .90-1.
Cooke D.J.(1991), .96
84
O Donnell & Edgar (1999), 91
83

56

 , Stanford . .

,
. 85

.
, .
,

. 86

,
. ,
,

.
.
, ;

,
,
,
.
.

85

O Donnell & Edgar (1999), .92-5. ,

, , ,
.
( vulnerable prisoner unit),
.
86
Zimbardo P.G.(1971), .112

57

 , Stanford . .

. ,

. 87

2.3.3

.

,

( , ).
, ,
. ,
.
,

.
,
, , .
,
.

87

Thio, A.(1998). Deviant Behavior. hio University, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc, .144-5

58

 , Stanford . .

,

, .


. 88
,
,
.

,
.
Stanford
89 .
, ,

/ .

.
,
( )
,
.
,
88
89

Haney C.Banks . & imbardo (1973), .15-6

, .(1991). , . . , , , .177-9

59

 , Stanford . .

.
, , ,
. 90
Foucault,
, .
,
.
:
.
, Foucault
,

. 91

Stanford , .
Foucault : , ,
, ,

,
. : , ,
, ...
,
, ,
, , ,
90
91

Haney C.Banks W.C. & imbardo1973 ..26

Goffman, E. (1963/2001), , . . , , , .28

60

 , Stanford . .

.
-
,
. 92

Foucault ,


, ,
93 . ,
,
,
.
, .
,
: ,
,

, ,
94
,
,
, .
:
92
93
94

Foucault (1976/1989), . 170-1

.. .182
...184 217

61

 , Stanford . .

,
.
,

,

. 95

2.3.4 -

Zimbardo


.

Milgram

.
Milgram
, Zimbardo :

95

(1991), . 177-8

62

 , Stanford . .

. 96
,
,
: ( )

. ,

. ,
,
. 97

Stanford

.
: .
.
.
Albert Camus,
, .

.
,
.

,
96

- (2003), . 258
Logsdon, J.M. & Brady F.N.(1988). Zimbardos Stanford Prison Experiment and the Relevance of
Social Psychology for Teaching Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, .707.
97

63

 , Stanford . .

.

. 98
,
,
.
,
.

(Tajifel & Forgas 1981) 99
. Festinger, Pepitone &
Newcomb Jung
.
Zimbardo ,
, ,
.
:
,
,
. Zimbardo,

98

- (2003), . 260
, .(1999). , , ,
, .283. ,
TAJIFEL,
.
- ,

.
99

64

 , Stanford . .

. 100
,
- ,
.
-
, isenstein,
,
:
, , .

.

.
Gibbon, .

. ilgram,
,
. ,
, . ,
Zimbardo,
100

Hogg, M.A. & Vaughan G.M. (2005). Social Psychology, Fourth edition, Pearson, Prentice Hall,
.423.

65

 , Stanford . .

,
-.(Wilder 1986) 101

,
, .


, .
Weiss, The investigation,
,
, (
) .
, ,
.
-,
. 102
-
, , .
imbardo
.
. ,
,

101

102

(1999), .385-6
, .(1989), , , , .154-5

66

 , Stanford . .

.
.
, (
, ,
) , ,
416.
, 416
.
. 103
,

.
,
,
.
,
, :
,
.
,
.
Milgram ,

, . ,

103

- (2003), .88 HANEY ... 1973

67

 , Stanford . .

, .

,

. Stanford,
. 104
O Cohen (2002) States of denial
, .
-
. .
,
. , , , .
,

,
. Cohen ,

, 105 .

,
.
: ( )

104
105

.. .- ( 2003) : 263-4
Cohen, S.(2002). States of Denial, Polity Press, x

68

 , Stanford . .

( ) (
).
Chomsky

106

:

, ,
.

My Lai Watergate,
, : ,
, ,
,
.
.

, ,
.

. 107

Cohen: , (
106
107

, . (1974), , , , .5
T (1974), .18, 21 25

69

 , Stanford . .

), (
) .
:
,
.
:
,
;
,
.
-


.
Bandura
.
.

,
.

.

.
,

70

 , Stanford . .

. ,

, , ,
, .
.. 108
K

.

. ,
.
: ,
,
. ,
,
. 109
,
.

.
.

,
.

108

Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social
Psychology Review. Special issue on Evil and Violence, 3, .201-2.
109
Bandura (1999), . 202

71

 , Stanford . .

.

. , ,
. andura
(ilgram),
. ,

.
,
. 110

, -
,
,
(
). ,
,
()

,
,
,
111 .

110

Bandura (1999), .202 209

Zimbardo, P.G.(1999). Transforming people into Perpetrators of Evil, why does genocide continue to
exist? Holocaust Studies Center,Sonoma State University, 1999 Holocaust Lectures, .2

111

72

 , Stanford . .

,
,

.
,
, ,

.
-
,
. ,
, .
. Zimbardo

,
.
,
. 112

( ) (
).

.

. Laino

112

, .- .(1999), .
, , .95

73

 , Stanford . .

(1980)

. Stepakoff,
, , ,

. 113

113

- (2003), .119

74

 , Stanford . .

STANFORD

.
Zimbardo
, , .


. Fromm, Hitler
,

. ,
.

. ,
,
( ) .
,
.

75

 , Stanford . .

,
.. 114

.
.
, ,
.
Bandura,
,

. ,
.
,
( ).

. Chomsky,



.
() 1991
.
. 115

114

Zimbardo P.G.(2005). Liberation Psychology in a time of terror. The Dagmar and Vaclav Havel
Foundation VIZ 97, Award for 2005
115
- (2003), .297

76

 , Stanford . .

Nils Christie,
. ( )
,
John Pratt Punishment and civilization.
,
.

.
Nobert Elias ,
,
, .

.
, ,
, ,
,
.
, .

. Pratt
,
, ,
. O o

77

 , Stanford . .

, ,
. 116
imbardo :

.

, ,
.
,


. 117
H ,
,

,
.
. imbardo,
,

, .
, ,
116
117

Penfold R. 2003 : 815

Zimbardo P.G., (1971) .115

78

 , Stanford . .

: ,
, , , . 118
,






.

.

, .
,

, , , ,
. 119

,
.

.

118
119

. .115
.116

79

 , Stanford . .

.
,
.
,
.


.
. ,
,
,
. 120

, ,
. 121

.
,
Equity Funding 1973,
.

,
. ,

120
121

.. . 117
.. . 118

80

 , Stanford . .

.
Johns -Manville
,
. 40 50
, .
,
.
,
.
-
,

122

122

Logsdon J.M.& Brady F.N. (1988), . 707-8

81

 , Stanford . .

3.1
.

.
,
.

,
.

. 123


.
()
. ,
. ,
,


123

(1994), . 223 232

82

 , Stanford . .

. 124


.
.
,


.
,

.
Stanford ,

.

,
, , (
) (
). 125

124

(2004), . 1
-, .(1996). ,
, .. .:
, -, .., .109

125

83

 , Stanford . .

. ,
,
,
.

. 126

WEBER
.

(compulsive conformity)
(compulsive alienation). 127
3

. 128

,
:

.

126

Kaiser, G.:
, . . : , 19931995, .17
127
, .(2004). ; ( )
, 3, .320
128

Kaiser G.. 82

84

 , Stanford . .

.

.

129

(solitary confinement)

. 130
.

,
. ,
60
.

131

-

. E. Pashukanis
, ,

. 132
Stanford,

129

, .(1996).
.
: .. .:
, -, .., .94-7
130
Kaiser G.. 23
131
, .(2000). ,
; ..(.) , ,
.., .124.
132

. 127

85

 , Stanford . .

, .

( )
.

,

.
( ).

,
. 133

,
,

. 134

.

, Zimbardo
. ,

, .
133
134

Kaiser G.. 15
(1998), .133

86

 , Stanford . .

Stanford,

.
,
,
. 135

,
, ,
, ,
.
Chambliss : ,

, . ,

,

.
. 136
E, 137

.

135

Logsdon, J.M.& Brady F.N.(1988), .705

imbardo, P.G.& Haney C. (1998). The past and future of U.S.Prison Policy, twenty-five years after
the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist,7, .718.
137
.. . 719
136

87

 , Stanford . .

, .


.
,
.

,
,
. ,

. ,

) ( ,
).


. 138

.

,
.
,

138

.. .719

88

 , Stanford . .

, (
) .
, ,

.
. ,
- -

, . 139

,
.

.
.
.


.

, , ,
.

139

....720

89

 , Stanford . .

.

,

.

.


.
,

,
what doesnt work (
) .

60,

. Lombroso

. , )
,
,

90

 , Stanford . .

) ,
)

)
, .
20

- . 140
Sutherland,
Principles of Criminology, :

,
..
(
)
. 141

, .


.
140

Cullen, F.T. & Gendreau P. (2001). From nothing works to what works: changing professional
ideology in the 21st century. The Prison Journal, 81, . 314-5.
141
.. . 316

91

 , Stanford . .

, .
1954, ,
. .
60,
,

.
. 142
1974

Martinson what works?

Questions and answers about prison reform,

, .
231
,
.

Martinson . Gottfredson
Treatment Destruction Techniques, ..

artinson
. 143
nothing works.


60 70, ,
142
143

.. .320
.. .322

92

 , Stanford . .

, , ,
.
.

, (
).
,
,

. 144
Rothman,
.
,
,

.

.
,

.
, (
)
,

144

.. .323

93

 , Stanford . .

. ,


. ,
.
.


. 145
nothing works, 80,

70. , ,

,
, .

,
.
what works
. , o
.

.
,

145

. 324

94

 , Stanford . .

.
(society of captives),
, , , , ,
.
,
.
(Haney & Zimbardo) ,
.
,
.
,
.
. 146
90, what works
,

-
.
60
70,
,
.

.

146

.. .:329

95

 , Stanford . .

,
. 147

.
,
. 148

,
, ,
.
.
,
,

.
,

. 149

147

.. ..333 -4
, .(2006), (, , ), :
.(.) , , , . 48.

148

149

imbardo P.G.& Haney C. (1998), .721

.

96

 , Stanford . .

. ,
imbardo

.
, ,
.


.
.
,
. ,

. 150

150

Zimbardo P.G.(2005)

97

 , Stanford . .

3.2 STANFORD,
: .

(). .
,
.

,
y Lai, , ,
, ,
.
,
.
, .
y Lai.
.

.

98

 , Stanford . .

. .
,
. 151
Zimbardo,
,
,
()

,

.
, , , , ,
, , ,
.
(deindividuation),
Stanford

.
Stanley Milgram,
,

151

Carrington, K.& Hogg R. (2002). Critical Criminology. Issues, debates, challenges. Willan
Publishing, .160

99

 , Stanford . .

,
. 152
Foucault , :
, , Jaucourt

. 153
-,
. 154

, -
.
, , . 155


,
(
,
) . 156
O ,

: ,
,

152

- (2003), .16
(1989), . 48
154
- (2003), .21
155
.. ..35
156
. 36 ROSS
153

100

 , Stanford . .

: ,
; 157


.

, (
) .


( , ).
, ,
. O Watson
Beerkum Kan Yagi
,
.

,
.
,

. 158
,

157
158

.. . 40
.. ..52-3

101

 , Stanford . .

, .

(dorno).
,
.
,

.

159

imbardo

.
,
, .
,

. ,
,
,
Abu Ghraib,
. Zimbardo Abu Ghraib,
(
), ,

159

.. . 155

102

 , Stanford . .

Stanford . 160

bu Ghraib

H
Guadanamo

Bay

.. ,
bu Ghraib,

.

CBS, 60 MINUTES II

Abu Ghraib,
Sadam Hussein
, .

,
,
160

Zimbardo P.G (2005),

103

 , Stanford . .

. ,
,

. 161


. Abu Ghraib,

,

( , , Camp X-Ray, Guantanamo Bay

) .
Abu Ghraib,

,

. 162

Foucault

: (

161
162

cLaughlin, & Muncie J.(2006). The Sage Dictionary of Criminology.Second Ed. Sage, .440.
.. .440

104

 , Stanford . .

) 163

. 164
, .
(
), .
. ,

.
,

.
,
( ,
). ,
. 165
imbardo,
bu Ghraib

1971.

,
,

163

(1989), .56
. 66
165
- ( 2003), .30-1
164

105

 , Stanford . .

- , ,
- .

. 166
Zimbardo,

. :

.
.

,
. Abu Ghraib,
-
,
. 167
Abu Ghraib,
,
Milgram

166

www.sfgate.com San Francisco Chronicle, May 8 2004, Stanford

experiment foretold Iraq scandal inmates got abused in psychology study.
167
www.apa.org./topics/iraqabuse.html

106

 , Stanford . .

.
,
bu Ghraib:
1 ,

2 (
ilgram), ( ),
.
.
3
4 .
imbardo,
, ..
Lifton,
:
.
.
,
, , ,

.

.
,

107

 , Stanford . .

( ,
). bu Ghraib,

. imbardo,
,
.
, ( ,
). ,
,
, , ,
, ,
, ,
,

,
, ,
, .. 168


,
.
.

.

168

www.apa.org./topics/iraqabuse.html

108

 , Stanford . .

,
, .
,

.
,
.
. ,
,
. 169

169

- (2003), 247

109

 , Stanford . .

.
Fromm
. ,
.
imbardo ,


.. 170 Fromm:
.
.

,
.

171 .
imbardo
. ,
170

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment
Fromm, E. (1977). , .. , ,
, .116

171

110

 , Stanford . .

Milgram
. 1965,

.
, 2/3
-
Stanford Milgram
. 1976 imbardo
, :

.
.
Stanford

.
,
.
.
; 172
.
,
. ,

172

www. Stanford.edu/dept he Stanford Prison

Experiment:still powerful after all these years Zimbardo, P.G.(1973b), On the ethics
of intervention in human psychological research: with special reference to the Stanford Prison
Experiment. Cognition, 2, 243-256.

111

 , Stanford . .

,
. ,

, ,
,

.

, .
, . 173

,.
.
,
,
. 174
,

,
. :

173

.Zimbardo (1973b),. 246-250

174

,
.

112

 , Stanford . .

, ,
. 175

, imbardo
:

;
,
;
..

.

.
,
,

. ,
, ,
.

. ,
. imbardo

175

www.forejustice.org/zimbardo/p_zimbardo_interview.html

113

 , Stanford . .

,
. 176 .

.
,
,
, ,
.


.


.
Fromm,
:
, ,


. .
,

. 177

176
177

www.forejustice.org/zimbardo/p_zimbardo_interview.html
Fromm (1977), .100

114

 , Stanford . .

,


. Fromm:


,

,
.
,
,

.
.

178 .
,

( ),
,

.
:

178

.. . 104-5

115

 , Stanford . .

,
,
.
;


.
,



,



.

. 179
,
Exeter St
Andrews, BBC
, (THE EXPERIMENT). H

179

.108-117

116

 , Stanford . .

,
.
Stanford .
imbardo,
. ,

Stanford.
status ,

. ,
180
imbardo :
,
, ,
,
, reality
show Big Brother

.


. 181

180

Reicher, S.& Haslam S.A.(2002), Social Psychology, science, and surveillance: understanding the
Experiment. Social Psychology Review, 5, 7-17.
181
Zimbardo, P.G. (2006), On rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study. The British
Journal of Social Psychology, 1, .48-50.

117

 , Stanford . .

Stanford,

.

.
.
,

.
.

,
. ,
ilgram ,
.
,
.

. 182
imbardo :
.
.

182

- (2003), .379

118

 , Stanford . .

.
. 183
Stanford
. ,

, .
, ,
. ,
.
,
,
.
O
,
.

.

. Zimbardo
,
. ,

183

.. .387

119

 , Stanford . .

.
.

184

, ,
.
,
.
: )
) )

.
,

( ),
,

.
,
, ,
. 185
,

. ,
.
,
, ,
184
185

Logsdon & Brady (1988), .706

Zimbardo P.G. (1971), .155

120

 , Stanford . .

.

. 186
imbardo Turner
-
. ,
,
.
( self-to prototype-matching)

. 187
;
, , ,


;

imbardo

John Watson,
,

, ,
, .

186

187

- (1999), .95
Eysenck, M. (1998 ), Psychology an integrated approach. Prentice Hall, .376

121

 , Stanford . .

: 80%
.
Stanford,
:
, ,
,
()

() .

,
,

,


. 188
imbardo
.
Craig Haney ,
,
.

188

Zimbardo P.G. (2004), ..38

122

 , Stanford . .

. 189
,
,
. ,

. , three strikes,
. 190
, imbardo

,
, . 191

,


. ,

.
.

189

.. .42
,.42
191
Zimbardo P.G.(1999), .13
190

123

 , Stanford . .

, 192
, ( ),
.
, .

,
. 193

,
,
. ,
,

.

, Ellis
,
.. ,

, ()

- ,

192

. Cohen Prison violence ,

.
193
Leger, R. G. (1988), Perception of crowding, racial antagonism, and aggression in a custodial prison.
Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, .178.

124

 , Stanford . .

. ,
. 194

,
.
. imbardo
, ,

.
, (
) (

. ,
,

Stanford.

194

Tartaro C.(2002), .509

125

 , Stanford . .

imbardo
, , ,
,
. ,



,
,
,

. 195
,


.

, ,
.
. 196

195

www.stanford.edu/dept he Stanford
prison experiment still powerful after all these years imbardo
1996
196
(2005), . 657-8

126

 , Stanford . .

(
) ,
.
,

,
.


: .
,
,

,
.
imbardo,
.
,
o
,
,
. ,
.
,

aney .

127

 , Stanford . .

..

.


.
,
.
,

, . ,

( )

. imbardo
-

,
.

.
Foucault
,

128

 , Stanford . .

:


.. , . 197
Zimbardo (2004) . 21


,
what works,

. 198
Stanford
:

: . 199

197

(1989), .153-4
Cullen F.T. & Gendreau P. (2001), .333 -4
199
(1989),.100
198

129

 , Stanford . .

,..(1986). , :
, 2, 17-22.

rendt, H.(2000). , -: - ,
, .

Bandura, A.(1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities.

Personality and Social Psychology Review. Special issue on Evil and Violence, 3, 193209.

-,

.(1996).

, ..
.: , -,
.., 103-110.

Carrington, K.& Hogg R. (2002). Critical Criminology. Issues, debates, challenges.

Willan Publishing.

Cavallaro, J.(2003). Review violence workers:police torturers and murderers

reconstrunct brazilian atrocities by artha Huggins, Mika Haritos- Fatouros and Philip
G.Zimbardo, British Journal of Criminology 43, 817-820.

130

 , Stanford . .

Cohen, A., Cole G.F.& Bailey R.G. (1976). Prison violence. Lexington Books.

Cohen, S.(2002). States of Denial, Polity Press.

Cooke, D.J.(1991). Violence in prisons: the influence of regime factors. The Howard
Journal, 30, 95-109.

Cullen, F.T. & Gendreau P. (2001). From nothing works to what works: changing
professional ideology in the 21st century. The Prison Journal, 81, 313-338.

, .. (1969). .
.

, .(2003). , , .

, . (1998).
. , 11, /, . .. .

, . (2004). . ,
.

Eysenck, M (1998). Psychology an integrated approach. Prentice Hall.

Farrington, K.(1992).The modern prison as total institution ? Public perception versus

objective reality. Crime & Deliquency, 1, 6-26.

131

 , Stanford . .

Fisher Giorlando, M & Jiang, S.(2002). Inmate misconduct: a test of the

deprivation, importation and situational models.The Prison Journal, 82, 335-358.

Franklin, T.W.& Franklin, C.A.& Pratt T.C. (2006), Examining the empirical
relationship between prison crowding and inmate misconduct: a meta-analysis of
conflicting research results. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 401-412.

Fromm, E. (1977). , ..
, , .

Haney, C.Banks W.C. & imbardo P.G. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a

simulated prison. dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology
and Penology, 1, 69-97. : www.prisonexp.org.

Hogg, M.A. & Vaughan G.M. (2005). Social Psychology, Fourth edition, Pearson,
Prentice Hall.

Goffman, E. (1963/2001), , . . , , .

K, .(1994):, ,
, , ,
.. , 11-33.

132

 , Stanford . .

Kaiser, G.:
, . . :
, 1993-1995, 11-45

, .(2000). ,
; ..(.)
, , .., 123-134.

, (1999).
, , .

, . (1999).
, , .

, . (1994). , , .

Leger, R. G. (1988). Perception of crowding, racial antagonism, and aggression in a

custodial prison. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 167-181.

Logsdon, J.M. & Brady F.N.(1988). Zimbardos Stanford Prison Experiment and
the Relevance of Social Psychology for Teaching Business Ethics. Journal of Business
Ethics, 7, 703-710.

133

 , Stanford . .

, A. (2006).
: , : . (.)
, , , 191-220.

, .(2004). , ,
.

. (2003). (
), , .

May J.P.(2000). Building violence, how Americas rush to incarcerate creates more
violence Sage.

cLaughlin, & Muncie J.(2006). The Sage Dictionary of Criminology.Second Ed.

Sage.

, .(2002). , ,
...

, .(2004). ; (
) , 3, 315-329.

, .(1980). ,
. - , ...

134

 , Stanford . .

, .- .(1999).
. , .

, .(1994):
: ,
, , .. , 41-48.

, .. (2005). , , .

, .(1999). ,
, , .

, .(1989). , , .

, .(2006). (, , ),
: .(.) , , , 39-62.

Penfold, R. (2003) : Review punishment and civilization by John Pratt, British Journal
of Criminology 43, 815-817.

ODonnel, I.& Edgar K.(1999). Fear in prison. The Prison Journal, 79, 90-99.

Reicher, S.& Haslam S.A.(2002). Social Psychology, science, and surveillance:

understanding the Experiment. Social Psychology Review, 5, 7-17.

135

 , Stanford . .

Tartaro, C.(2002). The impact of density on jail violence. Journal of Criminal Justice,
30, 499-510.

Thio, A.(1998). Deviant Behavior. hio University, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

, .(1996). . , ,
.

, .(1996).

. : ..
.:

-,

.., 93-101.

, .(1974), , , .

Zimbardo, P.G.(1971). The power and pathology of imprisonment. Congressional

Record. Hearings before Subcommittee No 3, of the Committee on the Judiciary, House
of Representatives, Ninety-Second Congress, First Session on Corrections, Part II,
prisons, prison reform and prisoner rights. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office, 15, 110-157 : www.prisonexp.org.

Zimbardo, P.G., Haney C.Banks,W.C. & Jaffe D. (1973). The mind is a formidable
jailer: a pirandellian prison. The New York Times Magazine, 6.
: www.prisonexp.org.

136

 , Stanford . .

Zimbardo, P.G.(1973b). On the ethics of intervention in human psychological

research: with special reference to the Stanford Prison Experiment. Cognition, 2, 243256.

imbardo, P.G. (1989). Quiet Rage: The Stanford Prison Experiment video. Stanford
CA: Stanford University.

imbardo, P.G.& Haney C. (1998). The past and future of U.S.Prison Policy, twentyfive years after the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist,7, 709-727.

Zimbardo, P.G.(1999). Transforming people into Perpetrators of Evil,

why does

genocide continue to exist? Holocaust Studies Center,Sonoma State University, 1999

Holocaust Lectures.

Zimbardo, P.G.& Maslach.C.& Haney C.(2000). Reflections on the Stanford Prison

Experiment: Genesis, transformations, consequences. : T.Blass Obedience to
Authority: Current perspectives on the Milgram paradigm, Mahwah, N.J. Erlbaum,
193-237. : www.prisonexp.org.

Zimbardo, P.G.& Johnson R.L.&Weber A.L. (2000). Psychology, 3rd Ed., Allyn &
Bacon A Pearson Education Company.

137

 , Stanford . .

Zimbardo, P.G. (2004). A situationist perspective on the psychology of evil:

understansting how good people are transformed into perpetrators, in A.G.Miller.The
social psychology of good and evil, Guilford Press, 21-50.
: www.prisonexp.org.

Zimbardo P.G.(2005). Liberation Psychology in a time of terror. The Dagmar and

Vaclav Havel Foundation VIZ 97, Award for 2005 :
www.prisonexp.org.

Zimbardo, P.G. (2006). On rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison
study. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 47-53.

, .(1976/1989). , .
., . , , ,.

, .(1991). , . . , , .

, . (1999). ,
, . . , , .

, (2002). ,
, .

- .(2003). ,
, . . , , .

138

 , Stanford . .

www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

www.sfgate.com

www.apa.org./topics/iraqabuse.html

www.Stanford.edu/dept

www.forejustice.org/zimbardo/p_zimbardo_interview.html

www.prisonexp.org.

139

 , Stanford . .

H
Stanford , ,

,
, ( )
. ,

.


.
,

.

.
,
.

Stanford

140

 , Stanford . .

141

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you
commit atrocities
VOLTAIRE