1. Discuss fully the Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of the
Republic Act 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 2. Enumerate and discuss why the three(3) provisions of the Republic Act 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 were voted down by the Supreme Court as categorically unconstitutional 3. Discuss why the SC decided that granting power to the Department of Justice to restrict computer data on the basis of prima facie or initially observed evidence was not in keeping with the Constitution 4. Discuss why Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago called the libel ruling erroneous ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITE 107 Professional Ethics for IT
1. Discuss fully the Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of the Republic Act 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 2. Enumerate and discuss why the three(3) provisions of the Republic Act 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 were voted down by the Supreme Court as categorically unconstitutional 3. Discuss why the SC decided that granting power to the Department of Justice to restrict computer data on the basis of prima facie or initially observed evidence was not in keeping with the Constitution 4. Discuss why Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago called the libel ruling erroneous -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITE 107 Professional Ethics for IT
1. Discuss fully the Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of the Republic Act 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 2. Enumerate and discuss why the three(3) provisions of the Republic Act 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 were voted down by the Supreme Court as categorically unconstitutional 3. Discuss why the SC decided that granting power to the Department of Justice to restrict computer data on the basis of prima facie or initially observed evidence was not in keeping with the Constitution 4. Discuss why Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago called the libel ruling erroneous