You are on page 1of 2

ITE 107 Professional Ethics for IT

1. Discuss fully the Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of the


Republic Act 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012
2. Enumerate and discuss why the three(3) provisions of the Republic Act
10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 were voted down by
the Supreme Court as categorically unconstitutional
3. Discuss why the SC decided that granting power to the Department of
Justice to restrict computer data on the basis of prima facie or initially
observed evidence was not in keeping with the Constitution
4. Discuss why Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago called the libel ruling
erroneous
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ITE 107 Professional Ethics for IT


1. Discuss fully the Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of the
Republic Act 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012
2. Enumerate and discuss why the three(3) provisions of the Republic Act
10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 were voted down by
the Supreme Court as categorically unconstitutional
3. Discuss why the SC decided that granting power to the Department of
Justice to restrict computer data on the basis of prima facie or initially
observed evidence was not in keeping with the Constitution
4. Discuss why Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago called the libel ruling
erroneous
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ITE 107 Professional Ethics for IT


1. Discuss fully the Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of the
Republic Act 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012
2. Enumerate and discuss why the three(3) provisions of the Republic Act
10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 were voted down by
the Supreme Court as categorically unconstitutional
3. Discuss why the SC decided that granting power to the Department of
Justice to restrict computer data on the basis of prima facie or initially
observed evidence was not in keeping with the Constitution
4. Discuss why Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago called the libel ruling
erroneous

You might also like