Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Factors in Uencing Corporate Web Site Adoption: A Time-Based Assessment
Factors in Uencing Corporate Web Site Adoption: A Time-Based Assessment
Received 16 September 1999; received in revised form 23 March 2000; accepted 19 June 2000
Abstract
Although the World Wide Web (Web) has become one of the most widely used information technologies, research indicates
that there are many rms that are still considering whether to establish a Web presence. This study presents results from a
survey of 286 medium-to-large US rms that have adopted corporate Web sites. Findings reveal signicant differences in the
reasons that these rms decided to adopt Web technology depending on when the rm made the adoption decision; early
adopters placed more emphasis on perceived benets and compatibility of the Web with existing technology and
organizational norms than did later adopters. This paper also discusses ndings for practitioners. Finally, some implications
for the future of the eld are discussed. # 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: World Wide Web; Information technology adoption; Electronic commerce
1. Introduction
Few topics have received as much attention as the
World Wide Web (Web) in the IT eld. The Web has
quickly become one of the most important mediums
for the sharing of business information among rms
(business-to-business, B2B) and between rms and
their customers (business-to-consumer, B2C) [16,63].
Organizations are now able to share information and
process transactions electronically with organizations
and individuals without the need for a formal business
relationship. The steady growth and development
of the Web has prompted many rms to reassess
and redesign the way they share critical business
*
0378-7206/01/$ see front matter # 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 3 7 8 - 7 2 0 6 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 0 6 4 - 1
338
339
[37,40,41], and complexity have been found to signicantly inuence the adoption of systems technologies [54]. Although Rogers' model also includes
trialability and observability, these have not been as
widely addressed in studies of IT innovation at the
organizational unit of analysis. Therefore, although
we borrow inspiration and general guidance from the
diffusion of innovations theory, we also rely on other
research models that more specically address IT
adoption. Research has expanded this theory to
include additional organizational attributes that may
inuence the adoption of IS innovations [13,30,60].
These include top management support [21,23,44],
technical compatibility/incompatibility [39], and
complexity of the technology [6].
This study does not attempt to distinguish between
adopters based on the way in which they planned to
use the Web (e.g. to primarily provide information, to
interact largely with customers, or to conduct B2B).
We wish to assess Web adoption among a variety of
industries, yet Web usage differs between industries.
For example, rms in the retail industry may use the
Web largely as a promotional/sales vehicle, whereas
other rms, such as those in the petroleum or industrial
products industries, produce products that do not lend
themselves to direct sales. However, the latter do use
Web sites to provide information to end consumers
and other external stakeholders and to exchange transactions with business trading partners. In order to
compare adoption decisions across time, and ensure
comparability across industries, a general framework
that has been shown to assess the adoption processes
of various other technological innovations seems to be
the most appropriate. The factors posited by the
diffusion of innovations theory have been demon-
340
Table 1
Operationalization of research variables
Variable
Question numbers
(Appendix A)
Operationalization
Source(s)
Cronbach's
coefficient a
13
[12,21,23]
0.95
Compatibility
Organizational
Technical
48
912
[12,20]
[39]
0.83
0.79
Complexity
1314
0.79
Perceived benetits
1522
N/Aa
rm's adoption decision. There is a positive relationship between organizational compatibility and e-commerce technology adoption. Thus, the speed with
which a rm establishes a Web site may also be
inuenced by the rm's perception of the impact that
a Web site will have on its cultural norms and business
practices. Hence,
Hypothesis 2. The Web is perceived as more organizationally compatible by earlier than by later adopters.
341
342
Table 2
Assessment of non-response bias between the first and second mailings and between respondents and non-respondents
Variable
d.f.
w2 value
4
4
3
3
18
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
2.71
1.01
6.25
2.33
12.60
1.06
0.48
0.31
2.29
0.19
1.64
4.54
0.607
0.909
0.100
0.507
0.817
0.303
0.489
0.579
0.130
0.666
0.802
0.338
4
4
3
3
18
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
6.19
4.80
1.75
1.53
15.80
2.43
0.07
0.00
0.46
2.52
2.36
29.00
0.186
0.308
0.627
0.675
0.607
0.119
0.786
0.997
0.498
0.113
0.670
0.001
343
Timeframe
Pioneers
Early adopters
3 years or greater
2 years up to less than
3 years
1 year up to less than
2 years
Less than 1 year
Currently developing site
Early majority
Late majority
Laggards
Total
Frequency %
24
68
8.4
23.8
95
33.2
44
55
15.4
19.2
286
100.0
344
Table 4
Profile of adoption categories by industry
Industry
Manufacturing
Education
Government
Finance
Insurance
Wholesale
Healthcare
Retail
Service industries
Transportation
Other
Total (%)
Pioneer
Early adopter
Early majority
Late majority
Laggard
12
4
54
8
4
0
0
4
4
0
10
19
6
18
12
6
7
0
4
4
2
22
23
4
20
9
6
4
0
6
1
5
22
25
5
11
14
7
14
2
7
2
2
11
31
9
4
9
9
5
0
7
0
4
22
100
100
100
100
100
Table 5
Correlation matrix for the original 22 itemsa
Item
2
1.00
0.84
0.70
0.57
0.43
0.19
0.08
0.06
0.19
0.06
0.21
0.17
0.28
0.12
0.09
0.16
0.13
0.18
0.30
0.28
0.28
0.22
4.19
0.82
3
1.00
0.77
0.64
0.48
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.08
0.28
0.17
0.28
0.06
0.16
0.18
0.16
0.20
0.35
0.31
0.30
0.24
3.93
0.87
1.00
0.60
0.44
0.24
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.14
0.29
0.18
0.29
0.10
0.13
0.15
0.13
0.10
0.23
0.22
0.22
0.20
3.68
0.95
1.00
0.42
0.32
0.29
0.32
0.17
0.10
0.35
0.18
0.28
0.07
0.20
0.16
0.24
0.26
0.28
0.22
0.26
0.29
4.00
0.81
1.00
0.22
0.16
0.19
0.12
0.02
0.22
0.06
0.25
0.14
0.11
0.11
0.14
0.17
0.27
0.15
0.26
0.21
3.42
1.00
1.00
0.67
0.44
0.20
0.01
0.24
0.10
0.21
0.19
0.10
0.08
0.17
0.15
0.13
0.06
0.13
0.24
3.89
0.93
1.00
0.58
0.12
0.00
0.20
0.06
0.13
0.16
0.19
0.07
0.16
0.18
0.11
0.02
0.09
0.30
3.76
0.99
1.00
0.19
0.10
0.18
0.16
0.19
0.10
0.13
0.12
0.14
0.12
0.15
0.03
0.13
0.20
3.34
0.99
10
1.00
0.24
0.50
0.21
0.27
0.14
0.04
0.00
0.02
0.05
0.03
0.09
0.07
0.06
2.06
0.87
1.00
0.26
0.34
0.19
0.18
0.16
0.09
0.24
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.22
3.49
1.00
11
1.00
0.40
0.31
0.21
0.19
0.16
0.19
0.13
0.18
0.14
0.15
0.20
2.22
0.91
12
1.00
0.50
0.33
0.05
0.11
0.10
0.00
0.15
0.17
0.07
0.03
2.66
0.98
13
1.00
0.52
0.09
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.17
0.08
0.15
0.08
2.37
0.81
14
1.00
0.08
0.03
0.08
0.01
0.09
0.02
0.05
0.07
2.95
0.92
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
1.00
0.61
0.65
0.42
0.34
0.17
0.41
0.61
3.05
0.99
1.00
0.58
0.35
0.35
0.19
0.34
0.49
2.75
0.84
1.00
0.48
0.29
0.12
0.34
0.72
3.31
0.94
1.00
0.39
0.36
0.49
0.53
3.98
0.72
1.00
0.48
0.47
0.41
3.80
0.78
1.00
0.50
0.21
3.95
0.84
1.00
0.55
3.89
0.69
1.00
3.47
0.91
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
mb
s
a
Items 13 are TM1TM3 meant to measure top management support; items 48 are COMOP1COMOP5 meant to measure organizational compatibility; items 912 are
COMTE1COMTE4 meant to measure technical incompatibility; items 1314 are COMP1COMP2 meant to measure perceived complexity of the technology; items 1522 are
PB1PB8 meant to measure perceived benefits.
b
All items measured on a five-point scale where 1: strongly agree and 5: strongly disagree.
345
346
interrelated set of indicators meeting one of the conditions for construct validity: dimensionality. If one or
more indicators measure more than one construct (i.e.
the measure is multidimensional), then it is difcult to
establish reliability, which is also a necessary component of construct validity. Many IS researchers use
exploratory factor analysis to assess dimensionality
[62].
Therefore, a series of principal components factor
analyses using a VARIMAX rotation were used to
assess unidimensionality in this study. Eigenvalues of
at least one and a scree plot were used to assess the
number of factors to extract. Dimensionality of each of
the factors was assessed by examining factor loadings.
Items with factor loadings >0.50 on factors with which
they were hypothesized to load were considered adequate indicators of that factor. Items with factors of at
least 0.30 on other factors were examined to see if they
conceptually measured another factor and were also
then considered for elimination from the model.
Twenty-two items were hypothesized to measure
ve constructs as shown in Table 6.
Table 6
Adoption constructs and items
Construct
Item
Label
Perceived benefits
PB1
PB2
PB3
PB4
PB5
PB6
PB7
PB8
Organizational compatibility
COMOP1
COMOP2
COMOP3
COMOP4
COMOP5
Technical incompatibility
COMTE1
COMTE2
COMTE3
COMTE4
Complexity
Complex to develop
Complex to use
COMP1
COMP2
TM1
TM2
TM3
347
348
Table 7
Operationalization of research variablesa
Label
Item
Organizational
support 4.79
(30%)
TMS2
TMS1
TMS3
COMOP1
COMOP2
PB3
PB1
PB8
PB2
COMOP4
COMOP3
COMOP5
COMTE1
COMTE3
COMP2
COMP1
0.92
0.89
0.85
0.72
0.61
Perceived direct
benefits 24.1
(15%)
0.87
0.85
0.80
0.79
Organizationl
compatibility
0.89
0.79
0.77
Technical
incompatibility
1.41 (9%)
0.90
0.78
Complexity
1.06 (7%)
0.87
0.79
Values below each factor indicate the eigenvalues and percent of variance explained.
Statistic
Wilks' lambda
Pillai's trace
HotellingLawley trace
Roy's greatest root
Pr > F
4.3492
4.0083
4.6627
16.9462
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
Construct
Perceived direct benefits (Hypothesis 1)
3.34
Organizational compatibility (Hypothesis 2) 2.80
Technical incompatibility (Hypothesis 3)
7.55
Complexity (Hypothesis 4)
1.38
Organizational support (Hypothesis 5)
16.40
0.0107
0.0265
0.0001
0.2403
0.0001
the technology is highly accessible and understandable, it is not perceived as highly complex.
For those variables found to be signicant, Tukey's
Honestly Signicant Difference Test was used to
further assess exactly where the differences lie
(Table 9).
Perceived direct benets of a Web site are more
important to pioneers (mean 3:50) than for laggards
(mean 2:90). Organizations that were the rst to
adopt a Web site perceived that this technology would
signicantly benet existing and potential business
information sharing requirements within the organization. Organizations that were later adopters of a Web
site perceived fewer immediate business benets.
These organizations may have eventually decided to
adopt this technology based on widespread acceptance
of Web sites by organizations in all industry classications, or the need to maintain technological parity
with other organizations in their industry.
Organizational compatibility was greater for pioneers (4.15) than for laggards (3.56) and late majority
(3.53). This nding supports the notion that organizations that perceive a Web site as a technical innovation
that readily aligns with their existing culture and
internal business environment will quickly move to
adopt the innovation. A possible explanation is that the
4.28
4.02
4.02
3.73
3.27
3.50
3.26
3.15
3.02
2.90
Organizational compatibility
Pioneers
Early adopters
Early majority
Late majority
Laggards
4.15
3.70
3.68
3.53
3.56
Technical incompatibility
Pioneers
Early adopters
Early majority
Late majority
Laggards
2.52
2.60
2.61
2.80
2.82
Complexity
Pioneers
Early adopters
Early majority
Late majority
Laggards
1.90
1.99
2.02
2.24
2.60
349
350
351
Table 10
Importance of constructs within adopter categories
Construct
Pioneersa
Early adopters
Early majority
Late majority
Laggards
Organizational support
Organizational compatibility
Perceived benefits
Technical incompatibility
Complexity of the technology
4.28
4.15
3.50
2.52
1.90
4.02
3.70
3.26
2.60
1.99
4.02
3.69
3.15
2.62
2.00
3.73
3.52
3.02
2.82
2.24
3.27
3.56
2.90
2.80
2.60
(0.48)
(0.65)
(0.64)
(0.80)
(0.77)
(0.67)
(0.88)
(0.76)
(0.71)
(0.71)
(0.65)
(0.81)
(0.80)
(0.77)
(0.76)
(0.65)
(0.85)
(0.77)
(0.72)
(0.71)
(0.70)
(0.73)
(0.72)
(0.77)
(0.76)
Mean (S.D.).
Top management in these adopting rms is perceived to believe that having a Web site is important,
that the organization as a whole favorably views
having a Web site, and that having Web site is perceived to be compatible with how the organization
currently manages its information and data resources.
This portrays a somewhat different picture than early
Web related research that suggests that corporate Web
sites are driven by bottom-up, grassroots movements
with little inuence from the top. Support and compatibility may be more important in Web adoption
than perceived benets; this is also different from
other technology adoption research ndings. Because
this data was not collected with this exploratory
assessment in mind, these ndings may not be valid
or reliable. However, they do suggest that our view of
technology adoption may not adequately explain Web
adoption, and that our understanding may be enhanced
by a closer examination of these inuencing factors.
10. Summary and discussion
By examining when they adopted, a picture of
differences in the rationale for producing a Web site
begins to emerge. Findings from our work indicate
that the earliest adopters placed signicantly more
emphasis on perceived benets for having a Web site
than the latest. Earliest adopters also viewed using the
Web as being more compatible with their current
organizational processes and systems; and viewed it
as being more compatible with their existing technological infrastructure. They also garnered signicantly
greater organizational support for a Web site than their
later counterparts. Consistent with the diffusion of
innovations theory, the early reasons for adoption were
based on benets, compatibility of the technology, and
352
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
353
354