Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Covaapr

    Uploaded by

    api-298261834
    33 views19 pages

    Original Title

    covaapr

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    33 views19 pages

    Covaapr

    Uploaded by

    api-298261834

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 19
    dams 128! Five Star Schools COVA 2014 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT The Annual Performance Report summarizes each charter school’s cumulative performance data and compliance information from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014, *As of July 1, 2014, COVA is no longer authorized by Adams 12 Schools. 2014 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT DISTRICT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY COMMENTS, COLORADO VIRTUAL ACADEMY The following commendations and concerns reflect evidence contained in this report and documents submitted to the district by the school. Commendations Contractual Requirements: COVA was in compliance with all requirements of the Annual Compliance Report. Independent Financial Audit: The independent audit of financial statements conducted for the year ending June 30, 2013 did not identify any material weaknesses. Concerns ‘Student Achievement: COVA earned 40.8% of points eligible on the School Performance Framework and was therefore assigned a Priority Improvement Plan. COVA will enter Year 4 of Priority Improvement Plan status on July 1, 2014. A school may not implement a Priority Improvement and/or Turnaround Plan for longer than a combined total of five consecutive years before the District is required to restructure or close the school, COVA received 50 “Does Not Meet" ratings on the school performance framework, Operational Non-compliance: ‘The District has cited 5 instances of operational non-compliance. Three instances remain unresolved. STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT This section of the annual performance report includes the following information: * School Performance Framework (produced by Colorado Department of Education) + District Summary Comments ‘Schook COLORADO VIRTUAL ACADEMY (COVA) - 1752 ‘This s the plan type the school is requied to adopt ane ‘implement, based on the 3 Year School Perfomance Framework. Schools are assigned a plan type based on the ‘overall percent of pons eared forte omit year Ihe offal percent of points eamed is matched tothe scoring _uice below to Getermie the plan type. Adina. ing fo meet test admiration andor test parciption assurances wl eultia a lower plan pe ctegey Pn Framework Points Famed Performance storabove 6% Improvement atorabove s74-below 6 ory improvement or above 33%-below &7% “eenacound below a Framework points ae cakcusted ung the percentage of points ezmed cut of plas eigble Far schools with data on al indieators the total point posible are: 15 points for ‘Academic Aetievement. 35 for Acatemic Growth, 15 for ‘Academic. Growth Gaps, and 35 fer Postsecondary and Workforce Rescnes. onduy 1.2014 ‘Academic Achievement aproacting 500% (75 out of 5 points) ‘Academic Growth Approaching (29% ( 1S0.0utoF 35 pois) ‘Academic Growth Gaps Does Not Meet 3AM% (Sout of 1S points) Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness Approsshing, 375% (131 outof 35 points) ‘Test Participation? ‘Meets 95% Pantcipation Rate ‘Schools may nat be eligi oral posible pons onan indicator due to nse numbers of students In these cases, the pois are removed om the poms gil, so scoces are not negatively impacted. "schools donot receive pons fortes participation, However, schools are asgned one plan type category lover than th points inate if they do not (1) mest at teas 95% patcpation ate in alr 38 but one content area (ean, wring. math, cence and COACT), oF for schoo serving maple eve (lementay mide and igh schoo! grades, eg. a 6-12 choo), meet at leas a 95% participation rate inal or ll but ore content ea when indi cntert ace ates are rolled up ‘cross school eels (lementary, middle and high school graded). “Data tis reportis based on rests fom: 201011 2071-12 2012-13, COLORADO DEPARTMENT of EDUCATION 1 ficial plan type based on: 3 Year SPF report Monee Approaching Approaching Does ot Meet “Approaching 20 er Froe/Reduced Lunch Eigble . 4 ‘Does Not Meet 234 7 ‘No Minorty Students Hi 4 oes Not Meet 190 2 st Ho ‘Students with Diabiics r a ‘Does Not Meet 130 7 Ne. English Leamers ° ° a Rao zi = = 4 Doss Hot Mat 7 4 Does Not Meet SH Minor Students n 4 Does Not Meet 180 20 2 Stents with Dabiies n + ‘Does Not Meet 130 16 ‘= Engl Learners 2 ° i Neo, i = : 1 4 ‘Does fot Meet ‘Count and ratings ae nat reported fr metrics when the school doesnot meet the minimum student coun required for reportable data 2 SPF 2013 - 0020-1752, 3¥ear euro 4 Azoroaching 2475 2 2 Reading 2 ve Mathers 1 4 Boes Not Meet 2493 78 7 No ‘waiting 4 4 oes Not Meet 2477, 38 56 No English Language Proficiency ACCESS) 2 Azoroach 20 a i - Free/Reduced iunch Eigzble Does Not Meet B3, 37 a No Minority Students 1 4 Does Not Meet sts = aa ho Students with Disabilities 7 4 Does Not Mest 338 35 76 No ‘English Leamers 7 4 Does Not Meet 33 38 3 Re 2 4 ‘Acproaching 70 ho Does Not Meet Does Not Meet Does Not Meet Does Not Meet Dees Not Veet Does Nor Meet 361 3 Does Not Meet 3 23 ‘Counts and ratings are nt reported for metrics wen the schoo! oes not meet the misimum surdent counts reqired for reportable data 3 552013 - 0020-1752, ear IEMY (COVA) Sta Aporoach ng Approve Meet: Aporoxenig Does Not Meet aorasch ng Does No: Meet (Graton Rate $759 61 A 4 Does Hot Meet 1386/1118/706/301 TENGBS7K 0 Disagzegated Graduation Rate 1 4 BSE Does Not Mest Free/Reduced Lunch Eile 025 1 ‘Does No: Meet BT/DSTROSTSS Tareas we Mino Students 025 1 Does Nor Meet AS36768, TISAVAI6. 0% 20%. Stusents with DisaTibes 025 1 Does Nor Meet 153710973140 13.171658205% ‘0%, Engi Leamers 025 5 ‘Does Rot Mest TINIE eu Iao% 208 Dropout fate 1 4 Does Not eet 7510. 1a Fr 4 Colorado, ACT Compose Score ‘Counts a ratings are not reportes for metrics when the school doesnot meet the minimum stadent counts required for reportable data 4 P2013 ~0020-1752,3ear eens “The School Performance Framework reports use thea, 5, 6- and 7ear graduation rates forthe school and cisaggregated student groups (students eligible for ree/reduced lunch, minority students, students with

    You might also like