Site Analytical Services Ltd. 5 A | Sta mst, Ai & Ener Chait, Later es eres Units 14 + 15, Fiver Rend Business Park, Tel: 020 8594 8194 ‘33 River Road, Barking, Essex I611 CEA Fax 020 8594 8072 Crirn J 8m WRBE, Re re aba Be Ete srvostseanenl ne eet wrt 19720235 March 2013, CAMBERWELL LIBRARY, 47-24 CAMBERWELL CHURCH STREET, LONDON SES 8TR REPORT ON A GROUND INVESTIGATION Propared for | Mansell Construction Services Limited ‘Aeting on behalf of Southwark CouneisA\s ste anayio evion Rot: 13120235 March 2013 Roport on a Ground investigation a Propoted Camborwel Library, London, SES For ‘Southwark Couneit 4.0 INTRODUGTION [A the request of Mansell Construction Services Linited acting in ason with Engineers Haskins Robinson Waters, Consulting Structural Engineers to Soulhwark Council, @ ground investigation was carried outa the above sie in connection with the proposed development of a one-storey open plan bulding to be used as a lbray. A Phase 1 Prelennary Risk ‘Assessment is presented under separate cover in a Sie Analyical Services Limited report (Project No, 13/20236-1) dated March 2013. “The information was requied for the design and construction of foundations and infrastructure forthe proposed development and to assess whether any remediation was ‘required for the protection of the end-user ftom the presence of potential contamination ‘within the sols encountered ‘Antisipated foundation loads forthe proposed new building are expected to be low and of the order of 60-100kNim" and ground slab loadings are expected to bo of the order of 10- Skin ‘Tho recommendations and comments given in this report are based on the ground conditions encountered in the exploratory holes made during the investigation and the ‘esl oF Ue tts made Inthe fll art th laboratory. K' must De noted that there may be special conditions prevaiing atthe site remote from the explratary hole locations ‘which have net boon disclosed by te investigation and which have not been taken into account In the report. No ably can be accepted for any such condtions “This report does not constue a fll environmental audtof either the site or is immediate et 1900235 1 Are 2019Site Analytical Services Ltd. 20. Alb. (National Grid Reference: 70 327 767) 2.4 Site Location ‘The ste Is situated toward the north of DEynsford Road in Camberwell South London, ‘SES, The site comprises ofa fat public space containing areas of paved hardstancing and ‘dense vegetation. The ste covers an area of approximately 007ha and the general area Is under the authority of Southwark Counc ‘The ste is surrounded by gardens associated with Lomond House tothe north, Southwark Magistrates Cout tothe east, DEynsford Road tothe south and Camberwell Green to the west, 2.2.Geology ‘The 50000 Geological Survey of Great Brain (England and Wales) covering the area (Sheet 270, ‘South London’, Sold and Dift Eaton) inaicates the site to be underlsin by Superficial deposits comprising of Langley Sik (River Brickeath) and Kempton Park River Terrace Gravel deposits resthg on the Lambeth Group at depth 2.0 SCOPE OF Wor 3.4 General ‘The scope of the investigafon was generally spoced by the Consulting Engineer and comprised ‘+ Tho dling of one shell and auger borehole to a depth of 20m below ground level (Borehole 1). in the event due to the density of gravels encountered at depth the borehole was terminated ta shallower depth of 15,50m below ground level +The dling of four continuous fight auger boreholes o a depth of Sm below ground level (CFA (04). n te event CFA 1A ana 3A were termmated at shallow depths of between (0.80m and #.80m below ground level due to the presence of a canerste foundations. CFA‘ and 3 wero cilled sterwards o replace these boreholes. ‘+ Sampling and in-situ testhg as appropriate to the ground constlons encountered in the boreholes. *+ Laboratory testing to determine the engineering properties of the soils encountered in the exploratory holes, Ft 1920038 2 ore 2019S Site Analytical Services Ltd. ‘+ Inerprettve reporting on foundation options for the proposed building and inirastructur, ‘+ Astuty into the possibilty ofthe presence of tore substances inthe sol, together with limited comment on any remediation required. 3.2 Ground Conditions “The lecatons ofthe exploratory holes are shown onthe site sketch plan Figure 4. ‘The boreholes revealed ground contons that were generally consistent withthe geological rocords and known history othe area and comprised Made Grourd up to 2.70m inthicknoss ‘esting on matarals typical ef River Terrace Gravel fllawed by deposits ofthe London Clay Formation and then Lambath Group which extended down to the fll depth of Investigation in the deep borehole. For detailed information on the ground conditions encountered inthe boreholes, reference should be made tothe exploatory hole records presented in Append A. “The Made Ground extendedto respective depths of 2.70m, .60m, 4.80m, 1.80m and 1.20m below ground evel in Borehale t and CFA Boreholes 1,2, 3 and 4 and tothe full depts of Investigation of 1.90m below ground in CFA Borehole 1A and 0.80m below ground level In ‘CFA Borehole 34. The depesits generaly comprised of a surface cover of grass and topsoil ‘overlying loose to medium dense clayey sity sand, fine to medium gravel, chalk, metal, ‘ashes, brick and Gancret rusle, Ox oundatlons Were encountered at depths of 0.60m and 490m below ground level in CFA Boreholes 1A and 3A causing the termination of the boreholes, Natural sols were encountered below the Made Ground an comprised loose becoming ‘medium dense and then dense sily locally clayey sand and gravel In varying proportions representing Kempton Park River Terrace Gravel. These essentially granular materials ‘exlended down to depth of8 10m in Borehole and to the fl depthe of investigation of up {to approximataly6.22m below ground level inthe continuous fight auger boreholes. ‘Weathered London Clay was encountered below the river terrace gravel and consisted of a thin layer, 0.20m in thickness, of fm to stif mottled sity cay with some becoming ‘occasional pockets and parings of sty fine sand which extended to a deptn of &.30m In Borehelo 1. The weathared ciay was underlain by more competent London Clay comprising (of siff becoming very sti fissured sly clay with occasional parings of sly fina sand and ‘scattered small gypaum cryeals. These deposts extended down toa depth of 17,80m below {round Tove in Boren 1 ‘The underlying deposits of he Lambeth Group were found to comprise italy of 0:20m thickness of danse fine to coarse gravel siz pebbles underlain by weak grey avgilaceous limestone. These materials extended dawn to a depth of 12 40m balow existing ground level in Borehole 1. Dense becoming dense to voty dense clayey sity fine sand wih ine to medium gravel sizo black “ourdded pobbles was encountered beneath these soll and ‘extended down to the fll depth of investigation of 18.60m below ground lveln Borehole ot 1900008 a arch 2013Site Analytical Services Ltd. 3.3 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in CFA Bersholes 1A and 3A and the material remained ently dry throughout. Groundwater etrkes wore encountored In Borehole 1 and CFA Boreholes 1, 2, 3 and 4 and are detailed below Exploratory Wate Depth (a) ois ‘Satu aa a0 diam now, ring 1 | Camibath eum ‘80min 20 minutes FAT a0 ivr Tovace dopa OFAZ 70 River Tarace dpa FAT 70 ‘iver Tease dopo FAA 400 iver Tevace deposits It must be noted thet the speed of excavation is such that there may well be insufficient time {or further light seepages of groundwater to entar the boreholes and hence be detectad, paticulal within more cohesive sot. Isolated pockets of grounduster may also be present perched within any lass parmeable ‘material found at shalower depth on other pars of the ste especially within any Made Ground Groundwater was subsequently found to have stablised at @ depth of 416m below ground level in the monitoring standpipe installed in Borehole 4 after‘ period of approximately |woweeks. Groundwater was not encountered nthe montoring stendripe placed in borehole OFA2, It should be noted thatthe comments on groundwater conditions are based on observations ‘made at th time ofthe investigation (February 2013) and that ehanges Inthe groundwater level could occur due to seasonal effects and also changes in drainage conditions, ot 1900236 4Site Analytical Services Ltd. AQIN.SITU AND LABORATORY TESTS. 44 Standard Penetration Tests “The resis ofthe Standard Penetration Tests carrad out in the natural gots are shown on the exploratory hole records contained in Appendix A. SPT 'N’ values range between 9 and ‘59 witha gradual increase in'N’ va with depth being apparent. “The results of the Standard Penetration Tests cartied out in the granular soll In the borehole ineoato thatthe Made Ground i ina loose state of compaction, the River Terrace Grave isin a medium dense state of compaction and the Lambeth Group isin a very dense state of compaction, “The resis of the Standard Penetration tests made in essential cohesive sols indicat that London Clay i Indicated to bo in ff consistoney. The correlation between SPT'N value ‘and measured cohesion is generally taken as a mulpir of between 4.6 and 5 on the SPT "value according to Stoud and Buller (1975) and has generally proved tobe reliable, “The results ofthe tests are shown on the appropiate borehole records and summary sheet Presented in Appendix A. 4.2 Undrained Triaxial Test Results {A single quick undrained tviacal test was made on a selected undisturbed 100mm dlameter ‘sample taken from Borehole 1 and tho results are presented on Table 1, contained in ‘Appendic B, The results show the sample of London Clay tobe in avery sf consistency. 4.3 Mackintosh Probe Tests In essentaly granuiar sols, Mackintosh Probe tests were made in order to assess the ‘elaive density ofthe materials. The resuls indicate tht the sity sand and gravel deposits are in a generaly loose becoming medium dense and then dense state of compaction, all results being based onthe generally accepled covelalion ae folows: Mackintosh N7S X 0:38 = SPT'N' Value Mackintosh NGOO X 0.1 = SPT'N' Value The results of the in-situ tess are shown on the appropriate exploratory hole records contained in Appendix A. arch 2019S Site Analytical Services Ltd. 44 Classification Tests Paice size astibution tests were carried out on elght selected samples of essentially ‘granu natural sol using wat sleving methods The resus ofthe test are presented in both graphical and tabular formats in Appendix. 48 Sulphate and pH Analyses ‘The results ofthe sulphate and pH analyses mad on two sol samples selacted to give a Fange of dept are presented on Table 2, whist further analyses on sol samples are given within the contamination test rests, both contained in Appendix B, Tho resis presented ‘on Table 2 show the soll samples to have water soluble sulphate contents of up tO (0.25ghire associated with noar noutal pH values. ‘The amples of Made Ground tested Indicated water soluble sulphate conten of up to 114g associated with near neutral to alkaline pH values. 5.0. CONTAMINATION TESTING. 5.4 General ‘Samples were obtained from 0.2m depth below ground level in CFA and CFA3, from (050m in CFA1, CEAZ and CFAd, and from +.00m depth in BH1 made at the locations Indcated on the site sketch sian (Figure 1). Samples were analysed from tis depth below ‘round level as iis fet that these sols wil be represontaive of those of highest end-user {exposure through the dermal contact, dust inhalation and soll ingestion pathways. The ‘sample from 0.60m in CFA was also'analysed for Waste Acceptance Citeria analysis in tder to the assess the sol fer waste disposal 5.2 Interpretation of Findings ‘The hazard caused by the presence ofa substance or element is not absolute but depends cn the proposed end use ofthe slo. Its understood that the ste isto be developed as a library and 2s such the Soil Guideline ‘Values for commercial use heve been used inthe following Sol assessment ‘Site data has been assessed against curent generic assessment citera (GAC) / guideline values in accordance with current industy praclics and statutory guidance; chet toxicology “(TOX), ‘Soll Guldetne Value (SGV) reports “developed. using’ tha. new Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment (CLEAV1.08) framework and CLR 11 (Environment Agency, 2008). However i must be remembered that GAC. are not binding standards but can be useful in forming judgements regarding the level of sk Le. unacoaptable or acceptable. Exceedance ‘of GAC docs not automaticaly result in the requirement for remedial isk management Work but would warrant futher assessment ot 1920295 ° ior teSite Analytical Services Ltd. 5.3 Soll Guideline Values, CLR Documents & Chartored Insitute of Environmental Health Values From January 2009 revised Sol Guldance Values for certain contaminants were issued in the Contaminated Land Reports (CLR) by the Environment. Agency In conjunction with Department ofthe Environment, Food, Agroulture and Rural Affairs. These values and the CLEA methodology used to derive thom have superseded CLEA and TOX reports fr sll contaminants. “The CLR Documents area serles of contaminated land guidance documents developed by various past and present government agencles involved with protection ofthe environment. ‘These documents sim to provide a set of generic Sol Guideline Values and a site specific ‘modeling programme based upon tolerable predicted uptakes from experimental data for @ Variety of common industial toxic contaminants, In Instances of carcinogenic. and Imulanagenic substances tte guideline values are sot on the bask of "A® Low As Reasonably Practicablo" (ALARP), as theoretically mutation can occur on exposure to a ‘single pate ofthe contaminant ‘AL he time of witing tis regort gonerc soll guideline values axe only in place for Selenium (19000mghkg), Nickel (1800maikg), Mercury. (410-26000mgikg), Inorganic Arsenic (64omghkg), Benzene (@5mokg), Ethybenzene (2800mghkg), Xylenoe (2600-3600mGg), Toluene (4400ma/Ka), Cadmium (230mgika) and Phenols (3200m9/Kg) = for & commercial “The Environment Agency hes also released a now version of the CLEA software and its handbook to help ascossors aatimate risks. The Chartered Insite of Environmental Health Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk Assessment adopt the Environment ‘Agency's CLEA UK (Bela) Model and as such have dedved guideline values that are ‘compatibe with curent English legislation, policy and technical guidance, Gono Assessment Citra for Human Health Risk Assessment for Chromium compourds have been produced by Chatered initute of Envionmental Health, Thesa’ are Trivalent Chromium (Chromium il) at €840mghkg and Hexavalent Cheomium (Chromium VI) at 35mg {ora commercial scenario, Assessment citeria for sole-ied individual Polycycic Aromatic Hydrocarbons have been produced by Chartered Intiste of Environmental Health: hawever no valies have been tached to Total Polycycle Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Steen Individual Poljcyol Aromato Fyuocarbons. wih’ altachedsereorng vais Incude wenzo(ajpyrene(t4mgik), Dibenzo(atjanthracene (f3mpkg), Fluorene (64000mgtkg) and Naphthalene (200mg) for @ ‘commercial scenario ‘The concentrations of the phytotoxc substances Total Copper, Taal Zine and Total Boron hhave been assessed against the Chartered Insitute of Enviermental Heal Generic ‘Assessment Citeria for Human Health Risk Assessment of 71700mgikg, 6S5000mgIkg and *192000mgiKg respectively which assumes a commercial scenario, or 2018Site Analytical Services Ltd. ‘The concentrations of Total Petroleum Hycrocarbens have been assessed against assessment cite for indiual Aromatc and Aliphatic carbon band ranges produced by Chartered Insitute of Environmental Hea ora commercial soon, ‘As no generic UK derived gudance is curently avaiable for acceptable concentrations of Total ‘Cyanide a screening value of 20mg (Thiocyanae) has been used asa preliminary screening {ool to identity where potenti risks may exist ‘Asino generic UK derived gudance is currently avalabe for accaptable concentrations of Total Lead a pervious Soll Guidtne Valve of 7S0mg/g for commercial land use has been used to Identify winere potetalrisks may exist 5.4 Assossmont of Soll Analysos Itis understood that the ste to be developed as a commercial brary and as such the Soil ‘Guideline Values for commercial use have bean used inthe folowing sol assessment. The. ‘samples selected for contarination assessment wore sub-conracted to QTS Environmental Limited (a UKAS and MCERTS sceredted laboratory) and thelr report Is contained in Appendix B, 55 Discussion ‘The concentrations of zootosc heavy metals (Total Arsenic, Total Cadmium, Total Mercury ‘otal Selenium and Total Nikel) encountered cil not exceed the Sol Guideline Values for ‘commercial use in any ofthe samples analysed. As such there fs not considered to bo any Potentially significant lovel of end-user risk associated with the concentrations of these ‘contaminants encountered, However, elevated concentrations of Total Lead were encountered inthe samples fom BH and OFA's 1, 2 and 3 ranging from 985mghkg to 1610mgiKg, n excess ofthe Soil Guideline Value for commorcial uso ef 760mgig. It wae therefore decided to undertake station analysis of the dala set, sing the arithmetic mean and standard deviation for Lead Following atest scenario from a planning perspective it was concluded tha the true mean of the sample population was i excess of the Soll Guideline Value of 750mgikg and as euch the potential sk tothe end-asers of the site from the concentrations encountered cannot be clscounted a ths stage, ‘The concentrations of Trivalent Chromium and Hexavalent Chromium encountered did not exceed CIEM Genedc severing values fr commercial use ‘The concentrations of Total Gyenide were below the screening value of 2Omgrkg and the concentration of Total Phencl were below the Sol Guideine Value for commercial uso and as such there are not considered fo be any significant rsks to endsers ofthe site from these ‘contaminants a 1300008 ® ov 2013Site Analytical Services Ltd. ‘The concentrations of indhiduel Polyeycic Aromatic Hydrocarbons encountered cid not ‘exceed ClEH Generic screening values for commercial use ‘The concentrations of Petzosum Hycrocarbons encountered within indvidual Aromatic and Alphaic carbon band anges inthe samples analysed dl not excaed the generic screening ‘values produced by Chartered Insitute of Environmental Health for @ commer scenario, ‘The concentrations of BTEX substances (Benzene, Toluene, Ethybenzene and Xylenes) ‘encountered didnot exceed tection limits and cid not exceed the Soll Guideline Valves for ‘commercial use in the samples analysed. AS such there is not considered to bo. shy Polenta significant level of enciuser risk associated with the concentrations of these Contaminants encountered “There was no MTBE detected within the samples analysed, “The concentrations ofthe phytloxic substances Total Copper, Total Zine and Total Boron ‘encountered in the samples obtained were below the CIEH Generic screening values for Commercial use and are not considered to be a significant rsk to end-usere ofthe site, oF sufficient to impair the successful growth of plant species on-site, Concentrations of Total Sughide didnot exceed Smakg inthe samples obtained from the site. Its therefore not antciated that suphides wit present any human heally risk atthe ‘te and are not considered sufcent to affect construction or service material, Elevated concentrations of Total Sulphate were encountered in samples from Borehole 1 {and CFA, CFA2 and CFA# that were in excess of the BRE guidance concentration for ‘aggressive ground with respect to construction materials of 2400 mgikg._ From the water soluble sulphate concentrations BRE Special Digest 1: 2006, Tables G1 and C2 would ‘classify samples as up fo Cass OS-2. As such reference should be made tothe appropriate 'BRE Guidance documents when selecting construction materiale ose. ‘All samples were analysed using the ‘Catwastesol" assessment tool, which concluded that ‘lof the samples from the sie were hazardous in nature {A sample of sol (CFA 0.50m) was analysed for Waste Accoptance Citeria Testing in order fo classify sols for disposal purposes. For the purpose of waste ips te sul sample would be classified a folows: OFA 1 @ 060m Hazardous Waste “The Loss_on Ignition encountered was in excess of the Unper Acceptance Limits for Hazardous waste, however when TOC was used instead the sample could bo classified as Hazardous Waste, ao 1900298 ® ‘er 018Site Analytical Services Ltd. 5.6 Conclusions Overall the contaminant ef concer with respect to enduser protection which was ‘encountered atthe site was the concentrallans of Lead encountered in samples from across the sie, withthe cial receptors being the end-users of the site and ste constuction workers “There remains the potential for some level of end-user risk posed by the concentrations of contaminants encountered, i is anticipated that tho protacon of the endiser may be Achieved by the folowing ‘Aroas of proposed hardstanding (e.9, building footprint, roadways etc.) In areas of permanent hardstanding such as the bulking footprint and roadways et. the ‘development itself would adequately break exposure pathways to human heath (although other exposure pathways may exist to other seneilve receptors requiring measures to Be implemented ~ see ciscussin below) and therefore furher remedial measures may not be required in these areas. ‘Sensitive ond use areas (sott-landscaping ote.) In areas of senstve end use such as softiandscaping ete. solls should be removed from the site to milgate the risks to end users and break exposure pathways, It would be Tecommensed tha the sls be excavated down teat east 600mm and replaced wih a clean Cohesive fil material of at least 600. ‘Any materials brought onto te site (sols and / or clay) shouldbe validated either at source ‘oF once lad at site. Given the nalure ofthe ground conditions, appropiate ean and sataty practices should be adhered to in order to protoct site workers. Any waste material leaving site for oftste deposal (col and / or water) shouid be handled In aecordanes withthe current Waste Management and Duty of Care Regulations. Other Receptors ‘The site has been identiied as above an area of potentially sensitive Secondary A Aquifer my messmo paso romana em [om E EMIS En ne Bake Jers. 8 oe a - | em$ Site Analytical Services Ltd. APPENDIX ‘B' Laboratory Test and Gas Monitoring DataSite Analytical Services Ltd. Ref: 13720235 UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST LOCATION Camberwell Library, 17-21 Camberwell Church Street, London SE6 GTR ‘BRI MOUSTURE “GUC TATERAL CORPRESSVE COVESION ANGLE DEFT — No. CONTENT DENSITY PRESSURE STRENGTH sHeanine RESISTANCE, % Mim savin? _ktwim*_iewim?_“dogroos im BHI 28401190 im 976 TabletSite Analytical Services Ltd. Ret 19720235 SULPHATE & pH DETERMINATIONS: LOCATION Camberwel Library, 17-21 Camberwell Church Steet, London SES STR ‘GHITP DEPTH — SOIL SULPHATES WATER SULPHATES pH CLASS SOL No. BELOW “ASSO, ‘AS SO, 2mm GL TOTAL WATER SOL ™ % all ol % BHI 9.00 025 70 0st 100 11.00 024 69 pst 100 Classification - Tables C1 and C2: BRE Special Digest Table 2ase | Ria ° ee | eo | oo | op Heo co [wo| ae ws) ae ° os | eo | oo | oo 1608 zo | wo] we weeny [eee wieany |e ea | ar (wa) | wa) cr won amie | 180 | oprouon | apmcins | (urdoon | yadten | goo | Ta | ncis 1 cee) aes | aos vag "eng alain | clon | eset | onttion ‘SENSRU ONWOLINGR Tome “CORD "HORDD wopenuesu09 Wey Ge] _ tape) pom emnaeag Aamo ‘oh “Pegu) ansog aewaiea ernest ee voppueg pn ‘SNOUIGNOD ONRIOLINOW Hu Aeonpessdo, ome de “reooad ae =m eH Pema oo Seen meunse eA oun {INaWAINO’ ONRIOUNON 10:66 2104 spunoy ob 94 evere -0e0 ey 3s msn yowsauieg ss 133HS ddO03e STOHSHOR ONRIOLINON WLVMANNOYO PUE SYDre ojae, re wa | so | 00 | 00 | em | co |wo| me ws [ar| eo |e zz | oo | oo | co | em | vo [vo] a seo [esa sean [ea a a was) ‘woneoey, Ss Soe SEER 07200 aang | VEO) SS | alin | ceo ots ea Sansse omaINOR Tommie "0oho0 "woRma womenuCO MORAY] Ras Gel pi ences OE ezah_agu) enerng onan ‘raedo, aieg__sevonpuco pune Reoeepeepes _suoRLeD REO ‘SNOUNGNOD ONTLOLINON manda veer oe — uy Pee “en mes ren oun sek wus -LNaWdINDS ONTOLINOW 14 36ea zee ‘pono con so sieior ea PL_Ueomeido ean soussaeo a {153HS GUOOa4 S1OH=ROg ONRIOLINON WALVMaNNOWO PuE SYSSite Analytical Services Ltd. Laboratory Test Results [DETERAINATION OF PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION enact] Oa | se meron © KA a ae * Hl fem ae (cg [oa a — se eT Te Te! [| SO wee Fer 00 cnet | fea nanan race Popo peer |e te oct | a a[Site Analytical Services Ltd. Laboratory Test Results | SS si at | mm eo | Bln Sa fee arb ee | ceatg nals ‘Pare Prapections eaSite Analytical Services Ltd. Laboratory Test Results DETERMINATION OF PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Sete] mm | sea act FE one Sy Ti sa os — [ws [iT Yo TR Ta (en Peer te [owe ing en Petcare ‘tomy one | 2 oysent: eNaREERS ASONS REOMEON WATERS ” DETERMINATION OF PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Site Analytical Services Ltd. Late Tet Rms eeseeaee = cnet Pate ratne Hu totes! AS TEP 49min pa on ttSite Analytical Services Ltd. Laboratory Test Results DETERMINATION OF PARTICLE Size DISTRIBUTION si | | a FE ne Vcuae [FeLi [ne Fea [aa [CH Tseeclsouoens! eet e u su ure [zen |e to ntrie eter peor [ae roy Seat urSite Analytical Services Ltd. Laboratory Test Results one: canes non WEE ~ DDETENIENATION OF PARTICLE SIE DISTRIBUTION ‘tara | im | | Section | ery] vom wo aw [Loi [ie re meen Tos loaaaea! | | 7 = a L [zum | ao | vests ete etn fem [eeSite Analytical Services Ltd. Laboratory Test Results DETERMINATION OF PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION cat] a sap oon Lae ar "ae OT rR TTS ssl be ow For oie ‘a i a sas etc rorton = tana come ur moat Ppa! 8507 AR 198075 pp 7 ASP a Imthoettat B87 P4RT2 08 rnp onSite Analytical Services Ltd. Laboratory Test Results ener: encncensnnooenontconress * DDETERIINATION OF PARTICLE Size DISTRIBUTION att] OF a te L—- "ay [Fi [a [eon rre Yai [Ome [a Tooasea! | Hd a Eo ‘ne | eer eo at Popo renin= QTS Environmental Report No: 13-13154 see sek5 nvonmentl ed os Rei oe ‘siauetone sal s08603 051105aaa ee{at5 Environmental Led ‘ne; Mose vane inaustal esta enham Hesth ‘Maldtone ‘res 01622 053105 egos aapenetra sia cen A ae Dare(15 Environmental tt ‘ne xRove tae Inurestana ore tan enna Heath aldstone ent e728 PES SHASHEGRA eStart: pt onto(1S Environmental ued mess ane nat sane Maldstone ent MEL? DN ols 01622 651105 AURseats Enwtronmanta i , 4B ent WEL? ICERTS vylvonea3 053105(ars Environmental itd Maldstone ent NEI? 2 ‘el 01622 651105{QrS Environmental Ltd ‘nit 4, Rose Lane Industral Estate Roe Lane Lenham Heath ‘Maiestone Kent MEX? 2 ‘rel: 01622 851105, a a Ch ye GC nny ren staat soaQtsemvironmental is Unie Ree tne uta Estate Rose ane enna Hath Maastone Kent et rel 01622 451105 “apna oanve Rosen gat tate Teron ere es aaa |Site Analytical Services Ltd. APPENDIX ‘Cc’ Statistical Analysies As Site Analytical Services Ltd. 389) Aiyjeutou 03 05 _ || 7 9} JOIN 0409 || _AteuuNs 0} 49eq || || _eIEP ON IFES faeries my] _ 95] oS EN a_i oS ssa] osrsera9 180 or See eae = a aas oaueg | [arove |= waimen nepeen asueg Guo eano| z Ten 2 wow oa SHIP LURSIOMNO [avmacwenmomer|| [a __= 38a} cane mncomny SHNSOY JSOL ‘gy gemseguey 21 218