GIS Best Practices

GIS for Archaeology

July 2009

Table of Contents
What Is GIS?

Protecting Archaeological Resources During

an Oil Spill in Washington State

Archaeology, Genealogy, and GIS Meet at

Columbia Cemetery

Reconstructing Aztec Political Geographies

13

A Cost-Effective Approach to GPS/GIS Integration

for Archaeological Surveying

19

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Administers

Archaeological Sites with GIS

25

Bureau of Land Management's Cultural

Resource Database Goes Digital

29

Modeling Archaeological Sensitivity in

Vermont with GIS

33

Understanding Past and Future Land Use

39

What Is GIS?
Making decisions based on geography is basic to human thinking. Where shall we go, what will it be
like, and what shall we do when we get there are applied to the simple event of going to the store or
to the major event of launching a bathysphere into the ocean's depths. By understanding geography
and people's relationship to location, we can make informed decisions about the way we live on our
planet. A geographic information system (GIS) is a technological tool for comprehending geography
and making intelligent decisions.
GIS organizes geographic data so that a person reading a map can select data necessary for a
specific project or task. A thematic map has a table of contents that allows the reader to add layers
of information to a basemap of real-world locations. For example, a social analyst might use the
basemap of Eugene, Oregon, and select datasets from the U.S. Census Bureau to add data layers
to a map that shows residents' education levels, ages, and employment status. With an ability to
combine a variety of datasets in an infinite number of ways, GIS is a useful tool for nearly every field
of knowledge from archaeology to zoology.
A good GIS program is able to process geographic data from a variety of sources and integrate
it into a map project. Many countries have an abundance of geographic data for analysis, and
governments often make GIS datasets publicly available. Map file databases often come included
with GIS packages; others can be obtained from both commercial vendors and government
agencies. Some data is gathered in the field by global positioning units that attach a location
coordinate (latitude and longitude) to a feature such as a pump station.
GIS maps are interactive. On the computer screen, map users can scan a GIS map in any direction,
zoom in or out, and change the nature of the information contained in the map. They can choose
whether to see the roads, how many roads to see, and how roads should be depicted. Then
they can select what other items they wish to view alongside these roads such as storm drains,
gas lines, rare plants, or hospitals. Some GIS programs are designed to perform sophisticated
calculations for tracking storms or predicting erosion patterns. GIS applications can be embedded
into common activities such as verifying an address.
From routinely performing work-related tasks to scientifically exploring the complexities of our world,
GIS gives people the geographic advantage to become more productive, more aware, and more
responsive citizens of planet Earth.

GIS BEST PRACTICES

WWW.ESRI.COM

Protecting Archaeological Resources During an Oil

Spill in Washington State
Using GIS to Ensure Effective Communication and Protection
There are 29 federally recognized tribes resident in Washington State, as well as a rich history
of cultural sites located along coastal shorelines and rivers. Therefore, any oil spill has the
potential to damage and contaminate archaeological sites associated with these areas.

Base GIS layer incorporating oil spill geographic response plan and watershed areas with tribal contact areas.

During an emergency response to such an oil spill, an effective response requires accurate
information and clear communications. To meet this criteria, the Washington State Department
GIS BEST PRACTICES

WWW.ESRI.COM

of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) and its GIS consultant, GeoEngineers, Inc.,
have created a GIS application that provides the Oil Spill Incident Command Structure current
data on archaeological site locations during an oil spill. This application was developed for the
Washington State Department of Ecology Oil Spill Response Program and includes contact
information for notifying concerned tribal government cultural staff. This Oil Spill Tribal Contact
tool provides quick and easy access to current tribal contact names for geographic regions.
During a recent spill event, the ecology responders were able to quickly identify the tribes of
concern by using the application. By clicking on a map at the location of an oil spill, a list of
federally recognized tribes was generated on the fly through an associated database.
Dr. Allyson Brooks, State Historic Preservation officer and director of DAHP, states, "Our ability
to protect these unique and special places in Washington is directly related to the speed with
which we can get information to the tribes and other decision makers and first responders on
the scene. By providing current data in spatial and tabular format, GIS helps us accomplish that
mission."
DAHP uses a combination of ArcView and ArcInfo for digitizing and maintaining archaeology site
locations. As part of DAHP's GIS initiative, more than 19,000 archaeological sites have been
mapped in GIS and attributed with information regarding site type (e.g., burials, petroglyphs).
Each site is mapped within a geodatabase and linked to a scanned image of the original
documentation regarding the discovery of the site. This data is available to DAHP staff via
a customized ArcGIS Desktop interface. It is not subject to public disclosure; however, data
sharing is possible with governmental agencies through memorandums of understanding. In
this way, DAHP is able to share this information with the Washington Department of Ecology for
protection of these valuable resources during oil spill events.
With funding from the state's Coastal Protection Fund and the assistance of the Tribal Historic
Preservation Offices and cultural staff of the 29 tribes, DAHP created a series of specific GIS
layers for each tribal government reflecting its geographic area of interest, its reservation lands,
and watersheds for which each tribe's cultural department wanted notification when a spill
occurred.

JULY 2009

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

An example of the tribal contact information presentation.

In many parts of the state, multiple tribes require notification. Also along the Columbia and
Snake rivers, tribes now resident in Oregon and Idaho have an interest and require notification.
The GIS application has a database table identifying any archaeological site potentially at risk
and the specific cultural staff contact with phone number, an after-hours emergency number,
and details on any staff who have hazmat training. These screens were created for ease of
use during an emergency and allow for quick printing of contact sheets. Also, since names and
phone numbers frequently change, the table was created to allow for ease of updating.
(Reprinted from the Spring 2006 issue of ArcNews magazine)

GIS BEST PRACTICES

WWW.ESRI.COM

Archaeology, Genealogy, and GIS Meet at Columbia

Cemetery
Building a Unique, Informative Web Site in Boulder, Colorado
By Mary Reilly-McNellan and Kip White, City of Boulder, Colorado
Cemeteries are a wonderful source of
information for anyone interested in digging
up information about their past. Genealogists,
especially, are known for their tenacity, and
generally leave no stone unturned when
it comes to researching their roots. But
sometimes time and distance preclude travel
that is often necessary to discover the clues
that may lie buried in preserved cemeteries.
Now, thanks to a new Web site developed
for historic Columbia Cemetery at Ninth and
Pleasant Streets in Boulder, Colorado, the dead
can speak any time, anywhere over the Internet
(http://gisweb.ci.boulder.co.us/website/parks/
parks_columbia/viewer.htm).
Boulder, like many municipalities, offers
GIS-enabled Web sites using ArcIMS to provide
its citizens with the latest information on flood
control, zoning, and historic preservation. In
2001, the Columbia Cemetery Preservation
project manager approached the GIS team
to ask if a Web site dedicated to preserving
the history of the cemetery could be created.
A great deal of information about the historic
cemetery had been compiled, but it was located
in many different places.

GIS BEST PRACTICES

It was a dark and stormy night. Hemlock

Holmes, ace Cemetery Sleuth, sat in his
cobwebbed study in the attic, clicking his
mouse button dejectedly. He sighed deeply,
his bushy brows knitted in a perplexed frown.
His research was leading him nowhere. As the
wind howled and lightning crackled, Holmes
lamented, "If only I could see what was written
on the tombstone, I'd know once and for all
if he was indeed my great-great uncle!" His
faithful companion replied, "Why not visit
the poor chap's grave, Holmes?" "Because,
my dear Whatsup, he's buried in Columbia
Cemetery in Boulder, Colorado. That's a long
way from our Backstop Street and Scotland
Yard."
Suddenly a URL flashed eerily on the screen
of his favorite search engine, and a Web site
began to load. "Hello! What's this?" Holmes
cried excitedly. "Great graveyards, I've struck
gold! I can access interactive maps of Columbia
Cemetery, a digital photograph of the grave
marker, a map of the lot, and biographical
information about the deceased! There's even a
virtual cemetery tour!"
He poured himself a brandy as he perused the
plethora of information, a satisfied smile on his
face. "Just as I hoped. He is my great-great
uncle!" He winked at his companion, saying,
"Elementary, my dear Whatsup, you know that I
always get my man!"
WWW.ESRI.COM

A marvelous opportunity existed, it seemed, to wed history and technology, but the solution
had to be able to make maps, display photos, query databases, and allow for customization, all
in a Web environment. Since Boulder has been a longtime user of ArcGIS Desktop (ArcView,
ArcEditor, ArcInfo) and ArcSDE and knows the power of GIS to integrate information, ArcIMS
seemed to be the logical choice to bring this disparate data into a unique and informative Web
site.

The interactive map of Columbia Cemetery is an HTML viewer page created by ArcIMS. The user
can zoom in and out of the map and get information about who is buried in a particular cemetery lot.

Columbia Cemetery is a virtual "Who's Who" of early Bouldera historic, cultural, and
artistic resource containing the remains of many of the city's founders and pioneers. Initially
established in 1870 on 10 acres of cattle-grazed pastureland, the cemetery today has 6,500

JULY 2009

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

burials and 3,000 headstones. Like many other Victorian era cemeteries, Columbia contains
grave markers of various types: monuments, crosses, obelisks, and tablets made of marble,
granite, sandstone, limestone, and wood. The tombstones not only mark the graves of early
pioneers who have helped make Boulder what it is today, but they are also narratives describing
Colorado's social and economic structure, its religious tenets, and ethnic composition. The
epitaphs, engravings, and decorations provide insight into earlier customs, religious beliefs,
folklore, art, and medicine. Homemade Depression-era "folk markers" are juxtaposed with
ornate and towering granite monuments belonging to bank presidents. Marble lambs and doves
mark the graves of children felled by scarlet fever, diphtheria, and tuberculosis, and graves
adorned with flowers, stuffed animals, and coins poignantly indicate recent visits to century-old
burials.

Columbia Cemetery Web site.

GIS BEST PRACTICES

WWW.ESRI.COM

Columbia Cemetery is owned by the city of Boulder and managed by the Parks and Recreation
Department. It is a city landmark and was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in
1997. Over the past decade, the Parks and Recreation Department and Historic Boulder, Inc.,
have been implementing a Columbia Cemetery Preservation Master Planthanks in large part
to funding from the Colorado Historical Society's State Historical Fund. Each grave marker was
digitally photographed, and more than 100 have received professional restoration work. Several
hundred others have received help from a group of volunteers that comprises the Columbia
Cemetery Conservation Corps.
Members of the Boulder Genealogical Society, in particular Mary McRoberts, have scoured
historic burial ledgers, mortuary documents, obituaries, and court records to compile information
about persons interred in Columbia Cemetery. McRoberts' information helped to make history
come alive for volunteers as she shared the life story of each person whose stone underwent
conservation work. The Boulder Genealogical Society published an eight-volume set entitled,
Columbia Cemetery, Boulder, Colorado, 1870 to the Present. In addition, McRoberts prepared
maps of each of the burial lots in Columbia Cemetery, indicating who had purchased the lots as
well as precisely who is buried within the lot and where. An index of Columbia Cemetery burials
is listed on the Boulder Genealogical Society's Web site (www.rootsweb.com/~bgs).
The Web site project actually began in 2002 when the Boulder Genealogical Society kindly
gave the city permission for use of its Index of Burials and biographical information contained
in the eight volumes. Oracle-based ArcSDE was used to store a cemetery map that was
digitized and registered to the city's aerial photography basemap. Tables were created to hold
each name, biographical sketch, cemetery lot, and grave marker photograph. By linking the
biographical information table to a grave lot feature, Web site visitors are able to query and
display biographical information with ArcIMS software's query server. Custom JavaScript was
used to send XML requests to ArcIMS software's query server and then parse the responses
to generate attractive Web pages presenting maps, scanned records, photographs of grave
markers, lists of all people buried in a particular cemetery lot, and biographical information.
What does the future hold for Columbia Cemetery? Hopefully, grant monies will continue
to provide funding for ongoing preservation of the burial ground, and grave markers will be
carefully repaired or restored one by one. The Columbia Cemetery Conservation Corps has
been working in the graveyard on Saturdays for five summers and shows no sign of stopping.
New ordinances are in place to help protect the graveyard, and the community enjoys strolling
the grounds, picnicking, and studying the fascinating old markers. Tours organized each year
JULY 2009

10

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

by the Parks and Recreation Department and Historic Boulder, Inc., are hugely successful.
Educating the public about Columbia and old cemeteries in general is considered to be the
best tool for fostering the appreciation and respect that will ultimately encourage people to help
protect these cultural treasures. And with Columbia Cemetery information now available to Web
users across the globe, perhaps additional information will come to light as the site is visited by
persons who have knowledge of Columbia Cemetery "residents."

A view of Columbia Cemetery with the Boulder Flatirons Mountains

in the background.

(Reprinted from the Spring 2004 issue of ArcNews magazine)

GIS BEST PRACTICES

11

WWW.ESRI.COM

Reconstructing Aztec Political Geographies

By Brian Tomaszewski, Pennsylvania State University
Editor's note: As part of research for his master's thesis, the author used GIS to link current
place-names to historical place-names so more can be learned about the Aztec culture of
pre-Columbian Mexico.

An Aztec conquest record from the Codex Mendoza showing place-name glyphs.
The seated figure shown toward the bottom left is the Aztec king Axayacatl who
ruled from ca. 1469 to 1481. The figures surrounding him are the place-name
glyphs for towns he conquered and subordinated to the Aztec empire including
a figure at the top center representing a larger town named Tlatilulco. Tlatilulco's
lord Moquihuix was conquered by Axayacatl and is shown being thrown down
from the main temple of his town, a symbol of total defeat. The scale of the
region is approximately 40 miles (64 km).

GIS BEST PRACTICES

13

WWW.ESRI.COM

The Aztec culture developed sophisticated political structures composed of complex hierarchical
systems of social authority, economic infrastructure, and interprovincial tribute. Following
conquest by the Spanish in 1521, elements of these systems formed the base for colonial social
and political structures, many of which persist as modern regional divisions.
Previous research on reconstructing Aztec political geographies typically involved identifying
modern place-names that have indigenous origins, matching these names to historically
referenced locations, and representing these locations with generalized cartographic displays.
This article describes a different approach using GIS. This approach matches uncertain
locations from the past to precisely known present-day locations. The GIS approach was
decisive in developing detailed cartographic summaries of social, political, and temporal
phenomena of interest. Integration with geodatabase technology provided the ability to leverage
tabular records derived from historical research at multiple spatial scales. With a geospatial
database at the core of the investigation, it was possible to process, visualize, and examine
data quickly and efficiently.

The Historical
Record

Investigating geospatial historical records relating to the Aztec rule in central Mexico is
challenging. The documentary evidence available covers a period approximately 20 to 50
years after the Spanish conquered the region. Investigators used Aztec and Spanish evidence,
together with historical and geographic expertise, to look back to the preconquest period.
Spaniards were interested in preserving the Aztecs' political and tribute structures to collect
taxes and develop their own political and ecclesiastical systems within existing native systems.
The Codex Mendoza [a document created to describe Spain's newly conquered lands to
her king, Charles V] is one of the most important primary source documents about ancient
central Mexico and Aztec political geographies. The Codex Mendoza provides place-specific
information describing conquest histories, daily life, and the tributes paid to the central empire.
Images in this document function as a map of historical events. These events are depicted in a
non-European cartographic manner and demonstrate some of the challenges in creating GIS
representations based on the historical record.

Historical
Database Schema
Development and
Implementation

JULY 2009

A computational system was developed to capture, store, and represent historic information and
help understand issues associated with pre-conquest central Mexico. A historical database was
developed to support two core tasks: creating a repository for historic information that would
provide query and analysis tools for nonspatial information retrieval and generating a database
schema that would provide attribute base information for GIS visualization.
14

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

Logical model for the historical database.

To visually conceptualize relationships between database objects, a logical model was

developed. The database is organized by top-level data clusters or logical grouping of
information. Each cluster is interrelated through key-matched information. A user-driven, time
period selection query is used to extract information based on research needs. The database
was implemented from the logical model. The historical database uses industry-standard
database objects (e.g., tables, views) to store and relate information. Seamlessly integrating
geodatabase tables with aspatial tables stored in Microsoft Access was especially helpful for
data integration and analysis.

GIS BEST PRACTICES

15

WWW.ESRI.COM

Using a GIS-Based
Approach

ArcGIS 9 ArcInfo was used for performing analysis, processing data efficiently, and querying
data structures on the fly. A place-name matching algorithm was developed to match historic
place references to modern place-name points using GIS. The algorithm accepts a time period
as an initial input parameter through a simple GUI. The algorithm uses a series of processing
steps that determine the match confidence. These steps proceed from human-focused data
matches (e.g., a modern town name for an ancient site has been established through careful
historic research) to computational string comparison matches that evaluate multiple partial
matches.
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) GEOnet Names Server (GNS) supplied placename points that were essential to the process of matching ancient place-names to modern
place-names. GNS provides access to databases of geographic feature names maintained by
NGA and the United States Board on Geographic Names. These databases supply 5.5 million
names for approximately four million geographic features worldwide excluding the United States
and Antarctica. Data can be downloaded in CSV file format with x,y values stored in a latitude/
longitude (geographic) coordinate system in World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84).
The output table from the name-matching algorithm was joined to the NGA place-name layer,
creating a table that contained data keys for both the modern place-name layer and historical
location records. With these links established, attribute information derived from historic
research could be rendered. Depending on the type of analysis, historical records that could not
be located were dropped from the join.
Once the historic attribute information was joined to the modern place-name point layer, attribute
renderings were created based on specific research needs. The ArcGIS Maplex extension was
used for developing automated label schemes that intelligently placed ancient and modern
place-name labels for each location. Custom label expressions of contrasting styles for modern
and historical names were derived from a single data table. The following code is an example of
a label expression that displays the modern place name in Arial, and the ancient name is shown
in parentheses in a smaller, italicized font.
[ANCIENT_PLACENAME] & VbCrLf & " _ " & "(" &
[MODERN_PLACENAME] & ")" & ""

JULY 2009

16

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

Map-based annotation layers were used extensively for fine tuning of label placement after the
initial label layout was generated. Given the large number of annotations, the ability to make
manual graphic adjustments saved many hours of map production time.

OBJECT_ID

FK_PHPR

ANCIENT
PLACENAME

2464

1365

Comalco

0
0

1148
1346

Cotlaxticpac
Cuauhtenco

3019

1274

Cuahuacan

MODERN
PLACENAME
San Jose
Comalco

MATCH
CONFIDENCE
FOUND_FROM_LIKE
NO_MATCH
NO_MATCH

Santa
Maria
Magdalena
Cahuacan

PLACE CONFIRMED
BY RESEARCH

Matching algorithm output sample.

An important feature of Aztec political geographies is how places interacted through political,
social, and economic systems. Conceptual representations of place relationships were based
on temporal period and visualized using line-direction symbols. Interpretation of the historical
record ranged from clear indications of place interactions confirmed by explicit references to
place-names to generalized, inferred, or uncertain references concerning place interactions. A
directional arrow showed the interaction between Aztec capitals and subjects. The certainty or
uncertainty of an interaction was recorded as an attribute as well as the name of the TO and
FROM points of the interaction.
To effectively show these interactions, an automated spider diagram creation procedure was
developed using ArcObjects. This procedure helped draw lines of interaction by querying
capital/subject relationships stored in the historical database. This saved time and provided
an automated, exploratory method for finding sites when visual inspection was no longer
effective such as when multiple locations with the same name were located near each other.
Approximately 25 percent of the time, computer-generated connections were wrong and
subsequently dropped from the historic database, but sometimes key links were found.

GIS BEST PRACTICES

17

WWW.ESRI.COM

Future Research

As the analysis moves further back in time, the historical record no longer provides evidence
and archaeological investigation will be required. Regional-level place interaction analysis can
determine which sites should receive a higher priority when developing research agendas for
archaeological field verification of locations.
Improved modern place-name database development, another area for future research, could
include a systematic comparison of NGA place-name points with annotation labels shown
on 1:50,000-scale quadrangle maps from the Instituto Nacional de Estadstica Geografa e
Informtica (INEGI). In less populated places, place-names don't exist in the NGA database but
are shown on the INEGI maps. Locating a broader range of modern place-names makes more
effective historic reconstructions possible. Finding a Mexican basemap series that predates the
1988 INEGI series would aid historic name identification by providing additional information on
variations in place-name spelling.

Summary

GIS can aid interdisciplinary research in history, archaeology, and geography. The use of GIS
and relational database management technology and datasets helped manage information and
increased understanding of where ancient Aztec places were located and how they interacted
with each other over time. Through improved data structuring, visualization, and analysis, GIS
has also helped manage issues of uncertainty that exist in the historical record.

References

Berdan, Frances, and Patricia Rieff Anawalt, Editors. 1997. The Essential Codex Mendoza. Los
Angeles: University of California Press.
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency: GEOnet Names Server (GNS), earth-info.nga.mil/gns/
html.

Acknowledgments

Portions of this research were funded by master's thesis research awards from the Association
of American Geographers (AAG) Cartography Specialty Group and the Terry G. Jordan-Bychkov
Student Research Award from the AAG Historical Geography Specialty Group.
The author thanks Dr. Michael E. Smith of Arizona State University (formerly of State University
of New York, Albany) for providing the idea for the project, many of the critical datasets used in
the analysis, and general direction for the project. The author would also like to thank
Dr. Alan M. MacEachren and Dr. Deryck W. Holdsworth of Pennsylvania State University,
Department of Geography, for their assistance.
(Reprinted from the JanuaryMarch 2006 issue of ArcUser magazine)

JULY 2009

18

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

A Cost-Effective Approach to GPS/GIS Integration for

Archaeological Surveying
Investigation Focus at Mexico's Aztec-Period Calixtlahuaca Site
De-emphasizes Temples and Tombs
By Brian Tomaszewski, Pennsylvania State University
Archaeological investigation often begins with systematic field surveys to inventory cultural
features and artifacts visible on the ground surface of a particular site or region. These
inventories are then used, in part, to gain insight into the overall spatial and temporal
dimensions of a site based on artifact types found and to make decisions about which areas
within a site will receive priority when conducting traditional ground excavations. Determining
which areas to excavate is important not only for the underlying research questions of a given
project but also for more pragmatic reasons, as most archaeological investigations are limited
by financial and temporal constraints. It is with these constraints in mind that a cost-effective
approach to integrating GPS technology with GIS was developed for an archaeological
field survey in central Mexico. This approach allowed for the collection of accurate, reliable
information about archaeological ground conditions, such as surface artifact densities,
subsurface prehistoric structures, and natural features that could be integrated into and
visualized with GIS for excavation prioritization and planning.
The field survey using this approach was conducted at the Aztec-period Calixtlahuaca site,
located in the Toluca Valley approximately 40 miles (60 kilometers) due west of Mexico City. The
earliest known occupancy of the site dates to approximately 1100 A.D. The site was occupied
by indigenous peoples until its conquest by the Spanish in the late 15th century. The site has
several pyramid or temple structures that were excavated in the 1930s by Mexican authorities.

GIS BEST PRACTICES

19

WWW.ESRI.COM

Surface artifact densities at the Calixtlahuaca site collected with GPS

(map by Juliana Novic, Arizona State University).

The team of investigators that conducted the survey are part of a National Science Foundation
(NSF) grant to examine the nonelite residential occupancy of the site, a research approach
that purposely de-emphasizes the investigation of so-called "monumental" structures, such as
pyramids, temples, and tombs. A 4.2-square-kilometer systematic survey was conducted to
find clues as to where houses and other nonelite structures were located, and the results of the
survey will be used to prioritize which areas will be excavated in the following field season.

JULY 2009

20

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

Earlier archaeological investigations at Calixtlahuaca focused on temples and tombs.

Today, archaeologists are looking for evidence of where nonelite residents lived on the site.

ArcGIS Desktop (ArcView) was at the core of the geospatial solution developed for the field
survey. In addition, Garmin eTrex Legend GPS devices were used for field data collection.
These devices are easy to use and rugged; have large storage capacity; were accurate for
the spatial needs of the field survey (within 1 to 5 meters at most control points when tested);
and, at a cost of less than $200 per unit, were within the project budget. In addition, the free
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Garmin Extension for ArcView facilitated
eTrex Legend's GIS functionality.
This DNR program provided the key link to integrating GPS-collected data with ArcView. The
program served as a bridge between the Garmin device and the GIS and allowed waypoints to
be uploaded and downloaded from the GPS device, exported raw GPS data to shapefile and
geodatabase feature classes, and provided functionality for synchronizing digital photographs
with GPS waypoints to create hot link features.
All data collected was stored in a personal geodatabase, which was selected because of
its native Microsoft Access file format (.mdb). This allowed spatial data to be integrated
with nonspatial datasets that were developed in a standard Access database. Access data
entry forms were quickly developed on personal geodatabase tables without any concern of
GIS BEST PRACTICES

21

WWW.ESRI.COM

damaging the spatial component of the data as spatial fields were simply left out of data entry
interfaces. In addition, nonspatial data could be quickly and easily visualized in the GIS using
join operations onto spatial data without any interoperability issues arising from trying to join
data in different file formats.

Surface artifacts collected and mapped in the field provide insight into where subsurface
structures and other cultural features may lie.

The ArcView functionality proved essential to the project. An important data source used in the
field surveys was digital orthophotos purchased from the state of Mexico. When the projection
of these photos was found to not correspond with ground-truth data collected by the GPS
devices, georeferencing functions of the ArcGIS Spatial Analyst extension were used to adjust
the imagery, which after rectification and warping then matched correctly with the GPS data.

JULY 2009

22

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

Because of budgetary constraints, the crews used hard-copy maps in the field to mark relevant
information. A critical component of these maps was Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)
coordinate grids displayed at multiple intervals. Field crews matched the coordinates from these
grids shown on the paper maps with their real-time position coordinates shown in the GPS. This
allowed the crews to stay oriented in the field and not waste time continually trying to figure out
their position from the paper maps alone. A custom ArcObjects script was created to generate
grid lines at user-defined intervals in a grid feature class layer that was used to generate these
maps.
In conclusion, the use of ArcGIS Desktop coupled with a cost-effective GPS/GIS solution,
ease of use, and integration capabilities of geodatabase technology allowed for the rapid
development of a comprehensive geospatial solution to meet the needs of an archaeological
field survey. By using this approach, financial and temporal constraints of the project were
overcome without compromising the scientific integrity of the overall research goals. Although
applied to archaeology, this type of approach could be used by any researcher who needs an
integrated GIS/GPS/data solution but lacks the financial resources for an optimal solution.

More Information

For more information on this archaeological project, visit www.public.asu.edu/~mesmith9/Calix.

For more information on the DNR Garmin Extension for ArcView program, visit www.dnr.state.
mn.us/mis/gis/tools/arcview/extensions/DNRGarmin/DNRGarmin.html.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project comes from NSF grant #0618462, Urbanization and Empire at the
Aztec-Period Site of Calixtlahuaca, Dr. Michael E. Smith, principal investigator. Additional
funding was provided by Arizona State University. ESRI software was provided through the
ESRI campuswide site license program (www.esri.com/campuswidelicense) at Arizona State
University. The project also thanks the Instituto Nacional de Antropologa e Historia (INAH) and
the state of Mexico for their cooperation.
(Reprinted from the Fall 2006 issue of ArcNews magazine)

GIS BEST PRACTICES

23

WWW.ESRI.COM

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Administers

Archaeological Sites with GIS
There are more than 2,000 archaeological and historic sites recorded on U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation-administered land in the Mid-Pacific Region. The region manages more than
900,000 museum property items, primarily prehistoric artifacts,
collected in support of cultural resource activities for reclamation
projects. These materials are housed at 18 different museums,
universities, and storage facilities. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
is an agency of the Department of the Interior. The policy of the agency is to administer cultural
resources in a spirit of stewardship for the benefit of present and future generations. It carries
out this policy through compliance with the laws and regulations that constitute the federal
cultural resources management program. This program requires that the bureau identify,
evaluate, and manage cultural resources (archaeological, historic, architectural, and traditional
cultural properties) under its control and jurisdiction. The bureau must comply with numerous
federal laws, including the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the Archaeological
Resources Protection Act, and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.
The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's cultural resources management is a multifaceted program
that encompasses responsibilities for (1) identification, evaluation, and management of cultural
resources under the bureau's jurisdiction or control; (2) the curation of artifacts and museum
property; (3) Native American concerns about human remains and associated cultural items;
(4) the issuance of permits for cultural resources work on the bureau's lands; and (5) public
education and outreach.

GIS BEST PRACTICES

25

WWW.ESRI.COM

Archaeology sites, displayed in 3D along the Cosumnes River, California.

For more than 10 years, the Mid-Pacific Regional Office has been in the process of digitally
capturing archaeological site data. A significant portion of archaeological site information for the
region is in a GIS. This information has been collected from a variety of sources for different
projects. Site information is considered to be sensitive data, so regional staff archaeologists
must review and approve access to cultural resource information.
Managing the digital data became increasingly difficult. The spatial data was stored under
different project folders, and site attributes were stored in different tables in a variety of formats.
For better control of the existing digital records and to avoid duplication of records, the data
is being centralized into a geodatabase. The geodatabase offers advantages in identifying
potential duplicate site locations. It has common table definitions and structures. It permits the
JULY 2009

26

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

application and use of a controlled vocabulary and assists in reporting and tracking the status of
site designations by the appropriate authority. The geodatabase also identifies the location of full
site records and survey reports or links directly to any available digital copies.

Example of archaeological surveys (white hatching) and the archaeology

sites (orange stars).

The geodatabase was constructed as a personal geodatabase with the ArcGIS Desktop
(ArcEditor) application ArcCatalog. As a management database, a site is represented only
once. The geodatabase model assists in preventing duplicate loading of a site multiple times
from separate project databases. It also prevents reporting of the same site with different site
designations by multiple investigators. Sites and site features are represented as points, lines,
and polygons. Sites that are in close proximity are identified and reviewed in ArcEditor, which is

GIS BEST PRACTICES

27

WWW.ESRI.COM

also used for verification and validation of proper location and site name. As the geodatabase
develops, ArcEditor provides the opportunity to set topological rules to assist in ensuring that the
sites and site features are appropriately represented for the different feature types.
The geodatabase model has allowed the development of definitions and domains of valid codes
that are consistent with the federal cultural resources management program. Definitions and
the domain of valid codes led to lively discussions among the archaeologists. This included
the application and meaning of terms such as Poor, Fair, and Good. These discussions also
assisted in identifying components of the geodatabase that the archaeologists needed in
performing their tasks.
Domains assist in standardizing information associated with the sites and provide a controlled
vocabulary for the geodatabase. These domains cover the time period associated with the site,
the organization that has surface jurisdiction for the site, site condition, and collection status.
This assists the staff archaeologists in completing surveys and reports for consultation and site
designations.
The ArcMap application within ArcEditor makes it easy for the archaeologists to craft maps
that meet the needs of the various offices of historic preservation. A major issue for the
archaeologists has been the assignment of the proper site identifier or name. The geodatabase
and ArcEditor have simplified their task in selecting and formatting the name to meet their
needs. It also assists in tracking the status of sites that are currently part of consultations
required under sections of the NHPA. A major task for the archaeologists is tracking areas
covered by any cultural resource surveys. This is a component of the geodatabase.
Access to the actual site record can assist in categorizing sites for analysis and in refining the
domain of site types. Viewing the site record is often preferred by the archaeologists when
selecting subsets of sites for analysis. At this time, only a portion of the site records is in digital
form. The staff members have direct access to these records for review and analysis by linking
to the full site record via the geodatabase. Other records only have major characteristics or
features identified as historic or prehistoric attributes in the geodatabase. Both methods are
used in the GIS by the archaeologists for selecting subsets of sites with spatial or attribute
queries.
(Reprinted from the Spring 2006 issue of ArcNews magazine)

JULY 2009

28

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

Bureau of Land Management's Cultural Resource

Database Goes Digital
California Field Offices Unlock Data for Archaeology Program
By Bradley L. Garrett
Recording cultural resources on federal lands has always been a tedious enterprise. Cultural
sites have been recorded for some time on hand-drawn maps using x,y coordinates from
GPS data. In most offices, detailed site records were stored in one place and location maps
in another. Often, data was lost in the process of report research when files were put back in
the wrong place. Even worse, when snap decisions had to be made, such as in the case of fire
emergencies, it took far too long to look up the pertinent data. What was needed was to get all
of this data in one place for easy reference.
That time has arrived. The United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) cultural resource
database has gone digital. Kirk Halford at the Bishop, California, field office, in collaboration
with Gnomon International, has developed a cultural GIS database tool for use within ArcGIS
Desktop. The tool enables cultural resource managers to easily digitize hand-plotted survey and
site locations for cultural resources. The tool also lets users copy previously existing GIS data
into the resource database. Finally, the software allows for the attachment of metadata collected
from site records and field-recorded information.
The software has been implemented across the state of California. BLM field offices have been
uploading their site and survey data into a central database with the guidance of Halford.
The Alturas, California, field office recently digitized data on cultural resources for integration
into the state database. More than 7,000 sites were digitized in the course of 30 days, including
some site information metadata.
The new working database will assist archaeologists at BLM in two very important ways. First,
the ability to statistically analyze large amounts of data may lead to new research possibilities
and interpretation of land use in history. Geospatial data also allows broad cultural patterns to
emerge, as population dynamics, temporal use patterns, and habitation centers begin to "pop
off" the map.

GIS BEST PRACTICES

29

WWW.ESRI.COM

A tool developed for the United States Bureau of Land

Management cultural resource database enables cultural
resource managers to easily digitize hand-plotted survey
and site locations, attach metadata collected from site
records and field recorded information, and copy
existing GIS data.

Second, the construction of the database facilitates quick reference when creating reports on
area impacts, such as environmental assessments, or when making quick decisions on potential
resource impacts, such as in the case of fire-line bulldozing in areas of potential cultural
sensitivity.
In short, data layering using ArcGIS Desktop allows complex corollaries to be drawn between
datasets. For example, when land jurisdiction is in dispute over a located cultural resource,

JULY 2009

30

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

transparent land allocation maps overlaid on site data easily solve disputes. These seemingly
simple ways of working with data will do nothing short of revolutionize the way archaeologists
work with cultural data.
Currently, the resource database has seen limited use within BLM due to reluctance to shift
to digital formats. The California Desert District and Surprise field office were the first to get
100 percent of their data uploaded. The Alturas field office has digitized the majority of its site
information but still has some work to do filling out attribute tables for the information. Alturas
may be able to finish up in another season. Hopefully, 2007 will be the year the rest of the BLM
archaeology program goes digital!

About the Author

Bradley L. Garrett was an archaeological technician for the United States Bureau of Land
Management, Alturas field office, for the summers of 2005 and 2006.
(Reprinted from the Spring 2007 issue of ArcNews magazine)

GIS BEST PRACTICES

31

WWW.ESRI.COM

Modeling Archaeological Sensitivity in Vermont

with GIS
Over the past several decades, significant improvements in processing capacity and GIS
software sophistication have encouraged the development and use of computer-based models
of archaeological sensitivity to augment traditional research approaches and field investigations.
The Vermont Archaeological Sensitivity Model (VTASM), a GIS-based framework for simulating
archaeological sensitivity statewide, is a recent example of this trend.
A key element of archaeological research and cultural resources management is estimating the
relative potential for buried cultural deposits in specific geographic areas. Reliable estimates of
archaeological potential or sensitivity are necessary for the implementation of effective sampling
strategies. Quality assessments of relative archaeological potential are also useful planning
tools, facilitating the avoidance of potentially significant cultural resources and minimizing the
costs of regulatory compliance associated with development.
VTASM emerged out of an interest expressed by the Vermont Division of Historic Preservation
(DHP) and the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) for a statewide GIS map showing
relative potential for subsurface prehistoric archaeological deposits. For several years, DHP
has been involved in GIS modeling of archaeological sensitivity at the watershed level, utilizing
environmental criteria specified on a field assessment scoring form used by the DHP and
consulting archaeologists. These criteria were adapted from a paper-based environmental
stratification model developed in 1989 by researchers from the University of Maine at
Farmington Archaeology Research Center (UMFARC) for a major pipeline project. Most of
the criteria highlight proximity to water and landform features that would have been central to
prehistoric travel and subsistence strategies.
VTASM is an integrated GIS solution for modeling archaeological sensitivity in Vermont based
on the well-established DHP environmental criteria. Structured by the new ArcGIS (ArcInfo)
geoprocessing framework, VTASM provides a suite of tools and a custom data management
system designed to allow on-the-fly modification of data inputs and analytical parameters,
facilitating the evaluation of different scenarios in a scientifically repeatable manner.

GIS BEST PRACTICES

33

WWW.ESRI.COM

Screenshot of Vermont Archaeological Sensitivity Model (VTASM) map document showing sensitivity surface,
custom toolbox, and a couple model examples.

VTASM was developed by a team of researchers from three organizations: ESRI Business
Partner Earth Analytic, Inc.; UMFARC; and the University of Vermont Consulting Archaeology
Program (UVMCAP). Project funding was provided by the Vermont Agency of Transportation
and the Vermont Division for Historic Preservation. Earth Analytic, Inc., served as the GIS
technical lead for the development and implementation of VTASM. A GIS steering committee
composed of archaeologists from a variety of state and federal agencies and institutions
provided oversight and feedback.
VTASM is implemented with ArcInfo, ArcGIS Spatial Analyst, and ArcGIS 3D Analyst, taking
full advantage of ArcGIS ModelBuilder software and the ArcGIS application ArcToolbox. At
JULY 2009

34

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

the core of the system is a functionally and thematically organized directory structure for GIS
data, documents developed with the ArcInfo application ArcMap, toolboxes, exported maps,
and documentation. The VTASM user interface is an ArcInfo document that points to all
required model inputs and a custom toolbox containing about 20 ArcGIS models: flowchart-like
representations of sequences of GIS data management and analysis processes. The VTASM
toolbox is subdivided into two toolsets: one for data preprocessing and one for statewide
analysis. Geoprocessing environment settings are configured at the level of the toolbox,
simplifying the process of changing default settings (workspace and scratch space locations,
output extent, mask, and cell resolution) for the entire statewide model.
The project database includes statewide wetland and hydrological datasets, including the highresolution (1:5,000) Vermont Hydrographic Dataset (VHD), as well as Soil Survey Geographic
(SSURGO) data for most of the state. A notable data limitation is the absence of 10-meter digital
elevation models (DEMs) for the state, although the model does incorporate lidar-based 8-meter
DEMs for a subset of the project area.
Five major preprocessing models prepare specific datasets for use in the statewide model:
hydrological nodes (confluence and terminus points, collectively referred to as hydronodes),
lidar, floodplain soils, streams, and wetlands. For example, one of these models draws on
outputs from four watershed-specific hydronode preprocessing models applied to each of the
17 Vermont watersheds (USGS HUC8). Another preprocessing model converts multiple CAD
point datasets into a triangular irregular network (TIN), then converts the TIN into an eight-meter
resolution raster.

GIS BEST PRACTICES

35

WWW.ESRI.COM

Putting the model to use, this shows the VTASM surface overlaid on the NRCS Vermont OnePlan map service.

The statewide analysis toolset consists of 11 environmental component models (ECMs) that are
combined in a composite archaeological sensitivity model. Each ECM yields a statewide
10-meter resolution raster with binary cell values. In each raster, cells meeting model criteria are
assigned a value of one and remaining cells get values of zero.
Six ECM models assign archaeological sensitivity scores to buffer zones associated with
specific water-related features: drainages, water bodies, wetlands, stream confluences,
stream-water body confluences, heads of draws, and waterfalls. For example, the Drainage
Proximity ECM generates a raster buffer zone of 180 meters around the preprocessed
statewide VHD drainages. All cells within 180 meters of streams are assigned a value of one
in the output raster. Given the large size of input datasets, the use of raster-based buffering

JULY 2009

36

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

methods (integer-based reclassifications of Euclidean distance surfaces) greatly reduced CPU

requirements and time relative to vector-based buffer operations.
The five remaining ECMs assign sensitivity scores to relict lakes, kame terraces, glacial
outwash deposits, floodplains, and areas of level terrain. One example is the "Paleo" Lake ECM,
which creates a statewide raster of all areas covered by soils (Vermont Center for Geographic
Information/SSURGO) formed in late glacial periods, just prior to the arrival of Paleo-Indians.
"Paleo" lake parent materials are assigned a value of one, and all other areas are assigned a
value of zero.
The final archaeological sensitivity model combines the results of the 12 component models
using a weighted sum function. For the preliminary release of the VTASM, all ECMs were
assigned equal weights by default. The resulting statewide raster has values ranging from zero
to nine, representing the number of overlapping environmental criteria for each cell.
While the preliminary results of the VTASM analysis are encouraging given that the model
has strong predictive value, project stakeholders recognize that, in many cases, computer
modeling is not a substitute for firsthand, field-based archaeological assessments. The project
has provided tools for modeling and visualizing reasonable proxies of prehistoric archaeological
sensitivity that can be used in concert with traditional archaeological approaches.
(Reprinted from the Spring 2006 issue of ArcNews magazine)

GIS BEST PRACTICES

37

WWW.ESRI.COM

Understanding Past and Future Land Use

Modeling archaeological sensitivity
By J. Brett Hill, Mathew Devitt, and Marina Sergeyeva
Predictive models of archaeological site location have great potential as tools for archaeologists
working in cultural resource management, and the ability to model archaeological sensitivity
has become increasingly practical with the development of GIS technology and the availability
of digital environmental data. A recent initiative to establish a National Heritage Area (NHA)
in the Santa Cruz Valley of southern Arizona prompted the Center for Desert Archaeology to
develop an archaeological sensitivity map of Santa Cruz County to aid in development planning.
GIS data was acquired from public sources including the United States Geological Survey, the
Arizona State Land Department, and the AZSITE Arizona archaeological sites database. [The
Arizona State Museum, the State Historic Preservation Office, the Museum of Northern Arizona,
and Arizona State University form the AZSITE Consortium.] Using this data together with
ArcGIS, and SYSTAT software (a statistics and graphing package from SYSTAT Inc.) obtained
through conservation grants, a predictive model was developed that proved both efficient and
informative.

About the Study Area

GIS BEST PRACTICES

Santa Cruz County is located in southeastern Arizona adjacent to the United States-Mexico
border. It comprises an area of approximately 3,200 square kilometers (km2) of Basin and
Range province topography with elevations ranging from 900 to 2,880 meters (m) above sea
level. The Santa Cruz River, the area's dominant geographic feature, flows through the border
and is flanked by the Santa Rita and Patagonia mountains. Except in the mountains, where
evergreen woodland exists, the Sonoran and Chihuahuan desert environment dominates.
Annual precipitation ranges from 300 millimeters (mm) in the low desert to 900 mm at higher
elevations.

39

WWW.ESRI.COM

Map showing the locations of the archaeological sites and survey projects used in the model.

Culturally the area has been the location of human habitation since the early stages of New
World occupation up to 13,000 years ago. It is also the location of early agricultural sites and a
setting for the introduction of domesticates to the region as much as 4,000 years ago. During
the last centuries before European contact, the area was on the border between the Hohokam
and Trincheras culture areas, and when the first European explorers arrived, the area was
occupied by native Piman groups, whose descendents still live here. Overall, there is good
evidence that some parts of the area were occupied fairly consistently for several thousand
years, and many areas of occupation in earlier times are still important in contemporary land
use.

JULY 2009

40

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

The Project

A goal in creating a sensitivity map of this area was to illustrate the integration of natural and
cultural resources and provide a sense of their value in a set of interpretive themes that highlight
the area's distinct heritage. Of these 10 themes focused on the unique biological and cultural
qualities of the area, twoNative American Lifeways (11,000 B.C. to present) and Desert
Farming (2,000 B.C. to present)are related to prehistoric settlement and land use. Most
themes also emphasize various aspects of life along the river oases that are so prominent in
this desert environment and provide the unifying principle for NHA. Demonstrating the
archaeological aspects of this relationship between land use and the Santa Cruz River system
was a key focus of the analysis.

Archaeological sites and survey project locations shown on DEM background.

GIS BEST PRACTICES

41

WWW.ESRI.COM

The larger goal in obtaining NHA designation was the development of heritage and nature
tourism in the area. Over the first 10 years, the impact of increased tourism resulting from the
NHA designation is estimated at approximately $1.8 billion in revenue and 40,000 new jobs. To
most effectively manage this development and its impacts, it is necessary to illustrate where
cultural resources are concentrated, their relationship to other resources, and how they will be
affected by increased tourism activity.

GIS and Statistics

The statistical technique used for this predictive model was the logistic regression technique,
described by K. L. Kvamme in a 1983 article (see References), which provides output ranging
from 01 that can be interpreted as a probability. Logistic regression is suitable for use with
binary-dependent variables and a range of independent types including categorical variables
common in environmental studies. For site locations, a set of 160 pre-European contact
habitation sites was obtained from AZSITE. These sites were chosen because they were likely
to represent the broadest range of activities relevant to the interpretive themes and were most
representative of past land-use and cultural resources that need protection.
For nonsite locations, a set of archaeological survey polygons was obtained from AZSITE
comprising 148 projects covering more than 70 km2 and representing approximately 2 percent
of the area of Santa Cruz County. A nonsite was defined as any area where survey work did
not reveal the presence of archaeological resources. Nonsite areas were converted to point
locations to create a dataset with attribute association comparable to site locations. This
process resulted in the identification of 310 nonsite locations distributed broadly across Santa
Cruz County.
Obtaining and developing useful environmental data can be the most time-consuming and
costly aspect of a predictive modeling project. Project constraints required the use of available
data that was typically collected for quite different purposes and recorded at a scale that might
not be appropriate for modeling some aspects of prehistoric land use. Consequently, it was
necessary to derive meaningful attributes from this data while still discriminating statistically
useful variation.

Looking at Water
Availability

JULY 2009

One especially important consideration in site location is difficult to address with standard
hydrographic data. This is the availability of water. In the deserts of the Southwest, this was an
important consideration for prehistoric settlers. It is difficult to identify this concern with current
data in a way that reflects actual availability. Hydrographic data available from government
sources typically does not adequately indicate subtle variations in water availability in the desert
nor does this data address differences between current and past conditions. Simple distinctions
42

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

between perennial and ephemeral streams, or methods of identifying stream order, do little to
indicate the actual quantity and timing of water availability that are critical to human uses.
Furthermore, surface water availability has changed greatly over time, particularly in the last
century, because modern uses have affected flow characteristics and the water table.

Map of the results of the BIC approximation model showing areas of archaeological sensitivity in Santa Cruz County.

For example, in the present analysis, only two small segments of the many streams in the area
were identified as perennial; the rest were considered ephemeral. However, a more extensive
perennial flow in the larger streams of this region has been historically well documented. In
addition, the mean distance to any stream from sites used in these analyses was 294 m,
compared to 303 m for nonsite locations. Such a small difference in distance to ephemeral
water sources hardly reflects its importance in this desert region and would provide little
GIS BEST PRACTICES

43

WWW.ESRI.COM

utility in discriminating among likely settlement locations. In the absence of an expensive

paleoenvironmental study of past fluvial conditions, hydrological modeling using the ArcGIS
Spatial Analyst extension and the Arc Hydro data model offered the best way to understand the
relative availability of water to prehistoric settlers.
Hydrological modeling characterizes the direction and accumulation of flow based on terrain.
The size of watershed is one of the most important factors affecting the amount of water
that flows in a given drainage. Based on the slope and aspect of each pixel in relation to its
neighbors in the digital elevation model (DEM), it is possible to calculate the total area that
flows into each location, or its flow accumulation. This is a quantity most usefully described as
a neighborhood statistic, as sites were typically situated near, rather than in, locations of high
accumulation.
A neighborhood sum was used to indicate the total area of watershed contributing to hydrologic
flow within 1 km of a site location. This measure characterizes the amount of flow available
in close proximity to a settlement and reflects variable availability as the distance from sites
to drainages increases. The calculation of the neighborhood statistic resulted in a mean flow
accumulation in the vicinity of sites that is more than 127 times greater than the mean flow
accumulation for nonsite vicinities and appears far more indicative of the variable availability of
water and its relative importance in this environment.

Choosing the Most

Appropriate Model

JULY 2009

Attributes of environmental variables were assigned to the collection of sites and nonsites by
location to produce a table for statistical analysis. An important problem in multivariate statistical
models is how to determine which variables will provide the best model. Some discussion in the
archaeological literature suggests using stepwise procedures, adding or removing variables
based on a predetermined significance value. This procedure has been criticized, however, and
the Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) approximation (Raftery 1995) offered a useful alternative
for distinguishing the best set of variables for creating an efficient predictive model. For this
project, BIC approximation indicated that a set of variables including flow accumulation,
elevation, distance to springs, soils, and vegetation provided the best model. Further tests of
this model against models suggested by stepwise procedures indicate superior performance of
the BIC model.

44

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

Results and
Discussion

The resulting predictive model provided mean probability estimates of .97 for site locations and
.03 for nonsite locations, indicating strong discrimination between location types. Reclassifying
the probability map, so values above .5 are positive predictions and values below are negative,
correctly predicted 98 percent of the sites and 98 percent of the nonsite locations. A more
efficient model correctly predicted at least 90 percent of the site locations by reclassifying
positive and negative predictions at a .96 cutpoint that focused attention on only 21.4 percent of
the total area as archaeologically sensitive. This model represents a 76 percent gain in
efficiency in identifying areas of interest for cultural resources. Moreover, it is in stronger
agreement with other models of natural resources, such as biodiversity, that are also an
important part of the NHA.
Despite the present need for a single model, it is essential to consider modeling as an ongoing,
iterative process. The current project is only a feasibility study and will be followed by continued
efforts as the NHA designation advances. Ultimately, more detailed management plans may
require more elaborate modeling efforts and the consideration of new variables as necessary to
clarify understanding of particular problems and relationships.
Also, understanding the archaeology of this region will certainly improve as more research is
conducted in coming years. As development expands greatly in the area, it will change the
articulation of past and present interests. The present model cannot be considered a final
word on archaeological sensitivity in Santa Cruz County. Rather, these efforts and the lessons
learned will, it is hoped, serve as a productive foundation for continued work. It is encouraging
that this initial project has offered a useful model and numerous valuable insights into the
modeling process. For a more detailed description of this project, visit www.cdarc.org/pages/
national_heritage/areas/scnha.php.

Acknowledgments

References

The authors thank William H. Doelle for the support necessary to conduct this research and
pursue the establishment of the Santa Cruz Valley National Heritage Area. They also thank Chip
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Jeffery J. Clark, Patrick D. Lyons, Miller McPherson, Anna A. Neuzil,
and Linda J. Pierce for their thoughtful comments on this research.
Kvamme, K. L., 1983. "Computer Processing Techniques for Regional Modeling of
Archaeological Site Locations," Advances in Computer Archaeology, 1:2652.
Raftery, A. E., 1995. "Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research," Sociological Methodology,
25:111163.

GIS BEST PRACTICES

45

WWW.ESRI.COM

About the Authors

J. Brett Hill holds a doctorate in anthropology from Arizona State University. He is a preservation
archaeologist at the Center for Desert Archaeology in Tucson, Arizona, and a visiting assistant
professor of anthropology at Hendrix College in Conway, Arizona. His interests are in GIS,
human ecology, and land use in desert environments.
Mathew Devitt is a master's student in anthropology at the University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque. His interests are in ceramic analyses and the late prehistory of the southwestern
United States and northwestern Mexico.
Marina Sergeyeva is a master's student in anthropology at the University of Illinois,
Urbana-Champaign. Her interests are in GIS and Paleolithic archaeology in Russia.
(Reprinted from the AprilJune 2007 issue of ArcUser magazine)

JULY 2009

46

GIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

Copyright 2009 ESRI

All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.
The information contained in this document is the exclusive property of ESRI. This work is protected under United States copyright law and other international copyright treaties and conventions. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, except as expressly permitted in writing by ESRI. All requests should be sent to Attention: Contracts and Legal Services Manager, ESRI, 380 New York Street, Redlands, CA 92373-8100, USA.
The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice.
U.S. GOVERNMENT RESTRICTED/LIMITED RIGHTS
Any software, documentation, and/or data delivered hereunder is subject to the terms of the License Agreement. In no event shall the U.S. Government acquire greater than RESTRICTED/LIMITED RIGHTS. At a minimum, use, duplication, or disclosure by the U.S. Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in FAR 52.227-14 Alternates I, II, and III (JUN 1987); FAR 52.227-19 (JUN 1987) and/or FAR 12.211/12.212 (Commercial Technical Data/Computer Software); and DFARS 252.227-7015 (NOV 1995) (Technical Data) and/or DFARS 227.7202 (Computer Software), as applicable.
Contractor/Manufacturer is ESRI, 380 New York Street, Redlands, CA 92373-8100, USA.
@esri.com, 3D Analyst, ACORN, ADF, AML, ArcAtlas, ArcCAD, ArcCatalog, ArcCOGO, ArcData, ArcDoc, ArcEdit, ArcEditor, ArcEurope, ArcExplorer, ArcExpress, ArcGIS, ArcGlobe, ArcGrid, ArcIMS, ARC/INFO, ArcInfo, ArcInfo Librarian, ArcInfoProfessional GIS, ArcInfoThe Worlds GIS, ArcLocation,
ArcLogistics, ArcMap, ArcNetwork, ArcNews, ArcObjects, ArcOpen, ArcPad, ArcPlot, ArcPress, ArcQuest, ArcReader, ArcScan, ArcScene, ArcSchool, ArcSDE, ArcSdl, ArcSketch, ArcStorm, ArcSurvey, ArcTIN, ArcToolbox, ArcTools, ArcUSA, ArcUser, ArcView, ArcVoyager, ArcWatch, ArcWeb, ArcWorld,
ArcXML, Atlas GIS, AtlasWare, Avenue, Business Analyst Online, BusinessMAP, Community, CommunityInfo, Data Automation Kit, Database Integrator, DBI Kit, EDN, ESRI, ESRITeam GIS, ESRIThe GIS Company, ESRIThe GIS People, ESRIThe GIS Software Leader, FormEdit, Geographic Design
System, ESRI BIS, Geography Matters, Geography Network, GIS by ESRI, GIS Day, GIS for Everyone, GISData Server, JTX, MapBeans, MapCaf, MapData, MapObjects, Maplex, MapStudio, ModelBuilder, MOLE, NetEngine, PC ARC/INFO, PC ARCPLOT, PC ARCSHELL, PC DATA CONVERSION, PC
STARTER KIT, PC TABLES, PC ARCEDIT, PC NETWORK, PC OVERLAY, PLTS, Rent-a-Tech, RouteMAP, SDE, SiteReporter, SML, SourcebookAmerica, Spatial Database Engine, StreetEditor, StreetMap, Tapestry, the ARC/INFO logo, the ArcAtlas logo, the ArcCAD logo, the ArcCAD WorkBench logo, the
ArcCOGO logo, the ArcData logo, the ArcData Online logo, the ArcEdit logo, the ArcEurope logo, the ArcExplorer logo, the ArcExpress logo, the ArcGIS logo, the ArcGIS Explorer logo, the ArcGrid logo, the ArcIMS logo, the ArcInfo logo, the ArcLogistics Route logo, the ArcNetwork logo, the ArcPad
logo, the ArcPlot logo, the ArcPress for ArcView logo, the ArcPress logo, the ArcScan logo, the ArcScene logo, the ArcSDE CAD Client logo, the ArcSDE logo, the ArcStorm logo, the ArcTIN logo, the ArcTools logo, the ArcUSA logo, the ArcView 3D Analyst logo, the ArcView Business Analyst logo,
the ArcView Data Publisher logo, the ArcView GIS logo, the ArcView Image Analysis logo, the ArcView Internet Map Server logo, the ArcView logo, the ArcView Network Analyst logo, the ArcView Spatial Analyst logo, the ArcView StreetMap 2000 logo, the ArcView StreetMap logo, the ArcView
Tracking Analyst logo, the ArcWorld logo, the Atlas GIS logo, the Avenue logo, the BusinessMAP logo, the Community logo, the Data Automation Kit logo, the Digital Chart of the World logo, the ESRI Data logo, the ESRI globe logo, the ESRI Press logo, the Geography Network logo, the MapCaf
logo, the MapObjects Internet Map Server logo, the MapObjects logo, the MOLE logo, the NetEngine logo, the PC ARC/INFO logo, the Production Line Tool Set logo, the RouteMAP IMS logo, the RouteMAP logo, the SDE logo, The Worlds Leading Desktop GIS, Water Writes, www.esri.com, www.
esribis.com, www.geographynetwork.com, www.gis.com, www.gisday.com, and Your Personal Geographic Information System are trademarks, registered trademarks, or service marks of ESRI in the United States, the European Community, or certain other jurisdictions.
Other companies and products mentioned in the ESRI Web site may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective trademark owners.
G34743_mg

ince 1969, ESRI has been giving customers around

the world the power to think and plan geographically.

The market leader in geographic information system

(GIS) solutions, ESRI software is used in more than
300,000 organizations worldwide including each
of the 200 largest cities in the United States, most
national governments, more than two-thirds of Fortune
500 companies, and more than 5,000 colleges and
universities. ESRI applications, running on more than one
million desktops and thousands of Web and enterprise
servers, provide the backbone for the worlds mapping
and spatial analysis. ESRI is the only vendor that provides
complete technical solutions for desktop, mobile, server,
and Internet platforms. Visit us at www.esri.com.

ESRI 380 New York Street Redlands, CA 92373-8100 909-793-2853 FAX 909-793-5953 www.esri.com