Issue: Whos committing the violation, rights violated
Rules: Treaty signatories, ratification Application: particular provision, state/private individuals Conclusion: opinions - Youre not expected to know the detailed jurisprudence of ECtHR case law on torture but youre required to spot the issue, e.g. torture - Not a strong right in CEDAW (did not specify sexual violence) - Customary international law - Check if the treaty is legally binding; declarations/reservations/derogations (whether it defeats the purpose of the treaty), times of war/national emergency - Human Rights Council is the overarching body; it conducts the Universal Periodic Preview - Human Rights Committee is the committee for the ICCPR; do not confuse the two - Analyse how the issue fits into a specific provision and how it is violated; how issue it might arise - Notice broader pattern, e.g. less concentration in international treaties regarding sexual violence - State the list of communication mechanisms if you dont have time for each treaties: (1) Individual complaints (limits, time scale, exhaust, etc); (2) State periodic reports (Grouping of patterns of the same violations); (3) Interstate complaints - Check if state parties have signed up in the communication mechanism; can lobby to include the case in state report or NGO reports as counter evidence - CERD has a fourth mechanism; a fact-finding inquiry (Treaty-based mechanism) - Non-treaty mechanisms: NGOs, UPR, - Counter issue of freedom of speech (engages a different rapporteur)