You are on page 1of 2

Skillbuilder 7 Diigo Annotated Bibliography

Tabatabaei, M., Schrottner, B. and Reichgelt, H. (2006). Target population for online learning.
International

Journal

on

E-Learning

5(3),

401-414.

Retrieved

from

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?
vid=1&sid=6d4c22fa-c7ad-458e-8f10-ea2a1b4e491b%40sessionmgr114&hid=117
Link to my Diigo: https://www.diigo.com/profile/njichopcho
The purpose of the article by Tabatabei, Schrottner and Reichgelt is to show that although many
institutions target mature part-time students for their online programs, there is little evidence to
support the assumption that adult part-time learners are more likely to prefer online learning to
face-to-face. According to the paper, little research has been carried out so far by institutions to
find out which group should be targeted for online learning.
The article draws from a study conducted by Dick, case and Burns (2002) to find out the
attitudes of different groups of students to online learning and reasons for their attitudes. This
study shows that face-to-face students show less preference to online education than online
students while online learners prefer online learning to face-to-face learning. Also, Australian
students are more likely to prefer distance education than US students. The study also noticed
variations within the groups; first, second, third year undergraduate and final year MBA
programs, based on familiarity with material covered, attitude as a result of exposure and
delivery methods.
I agree with the assumption that mature part-time students are not the only target group for
distance education. However, I do not find the results of the study generalizable for two reasons;

it considers only students from two countries and two continents and it is biased when it seeks to
find out from face-to-face students whether they would have preferred distance education to
face-to-face and from distance education students if they prefer distanced education to face-toface. The results simply reflect their insecurities deviating from what they are used to.

You might also like