A large portion of the chapter was devoted to formative data analysis. Authors used the analogy of putting together a puzzle where there is no picture. Authors suggested that you write up your findings and discuss it with colleagues.
A large portion of the chapter was devoted to formative data analysis. Authors used the analogy of putting together a puzzle where there is no picture. Authors suggested that you write up your findings and discuss it with colleagues.
A large portion of the chapter was devoted to formative data analysis. Authors used the analogy of putting together a puzzle where there is no picture. Authors suggested that you write up your findings and discuss it with colleagues.
This chapter is all about how to analyze your data. I have to admit that I am usually pretty good about gathering evidence, but Im not really sure about what to do with it. A large portion of the chapter was devoted to formative data analysis. It gave several examples of what elementary school teachers do, which is somewhat off-putting for me. It did talk about analyzing date as you are collecting it, though. This is something I think most of us do naturally, but not intentionally. We tend to tweak things as we are going through the day, repeating the lessons we just taught, so the students at the end of the day get a slightly different (often better) version of the lesson. However, we dont often think about why things are occurring the way they are or analyze specific students or behavior as we are teaching. The next section dealt with summative data analysis. I found this to be the most interesting portion of the chapter. The authors used the analogy of putting together a puzzle where there is no picture for reference, plus there are extra pieces and several pieces are still at the store. You will have to return there once you find out you are missing pieces. It discussed rearranging your data set (puzzle pieces) and classifying it into different groupings until you are able to get the information you want. This would be similar to regrouping puzzle pieces by color or function. They suggested that it is important to let the data speak for itself and resist trying to force it into your own prejudiced groupings. One thing the chapter suggested, which should be obvious but wasnt to me, is to make sure you write up your findings and discuss it with colleagues. I believe this class could be a natural way to do this. However, I am not sure if any of us have the time this semester.