A teacher uploads a copy of a textbook to the Internet for his students to use. The school was facing budget cuts and did not have enough books for everyone. A teacher could potentially be covered under fair use if the textbook was copyrighted under creative commons.
A teacher uploads a copy of a textbook to the Internet for his students to use. The school was facing budget cuts and did not have enough books for everyone. A teacher could potentially be covered under fair use if the textbook was copyrighted under creative commons.
A teacher uploads a copy of a textbook to the Internet for his students to use. The school was facing budget cuts and did not have enough books for everyone. A teacher could potentially be covered under fair use if the textbook was copyrighted under creative commons.
Case Study #1 Scenario 5 In my scenario, Dan uploaded a copy of a textbook to the internet for his students to use because his school was facing budget cuts. The school had already purchased these books, but they did not have enough left for everyone to use. I believe that this is not a clear cut situation. It falls in the hazy area between copyright infringement and fair use. From a strict law perspective, Dan has violated copyright laws and is therefore subject to copyright infringement penalties. Fair use states that only 10 percent of a work can be uploaded for classroom use. Dan uploaded the whole textbook. This puts him at fault. Along with that, Dan could get in trouble for affecting future sales of the textbook. Dan could also potentially face consequences for putting the article on the internet as well. However, looking at the situation from a teacher perspective, Dan could potentially be covered under fair use. Since he is using the uploaded file for educational purposes, the rules change. Dan did not upload a copy of the textbook to the internet so that everyone could see it. He did it strictly only for his class to use. He also was not doing this act to gain a profit but to guide students in learning. This whole situation could be a moot point if the textbook was copyrighted under Creative Commons. Creative Commons allows people to share creativity that protects ones ideas from things that one does not give consent to. Even if the textbook was copyrighted under all of the possible stipulations that Creative Commons offers, Dan would be in the clear. Dan was not using the textbook to make money and he was not altering anything that was in the textbook. All Dan would have to do is acknowledge the author and share the information under the same stipulations that the textbook was originally shared under. After evaluating both sides of this scenario, I have come to the conclusion that there is no set in stone answer for this scenario. This one falls in that broad line between copyright and fair use.