You are on page 1of 65

Joseph Hall - Redirect

Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

85

later point asked for reconsideration of the vote.

has been no further -- there was no further testimony

regarding the disposition of the motion for reconsideration,

the request for reconsideration.

There

Secondly, Mr. St. John testified that when

Mr. Riddle's request for the $25,000 was voiced and

Mr. St. John said no, Mr. Riddle showed no reaction.

8
9
10

Third, the last witness, Mr. Hall, never worked in


any of the -- never performed in any of the clubs.
Thank you.

11

Let's go ahead.

12

MR. GARDEY:

13

as a witness.

14
15

The United States calls Chris Jackson

THE COURT:

In front of me, sir.

Raise your right

hand.

16

17

CHRISTOPHER JACKSON,

18

being first duly sworn by the Court to tell

19

the truth, was examined and testified upon his

20

oath as follows:

21

22

DIRECT EXAMINATION

23

BY MR. GARDEY:

24

Q.

25

That's good.

Mr. Jackson, if you could pull the microphone down.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

86

Please state your full name for the record and

spell your last name.

A.

Christopher Troy Jackson, J-a-c-k-s-o-n.

MR. GARDEY:

Your Honor, at this time the

government would move Exhibits 22A through E and Exhibit 23

into evidence.

Those are the Deja Vu exhibits.

THE COURT:

MR. GARDEY:

THE COURT:

10

MR. GARDEY:

11

THE COURT:

Hold on.

22?

22A through E.
Admitted.
And Exhibit 23.
Admitted.

12

BY MR. GARDEY:

13

Q.

Mr. Jackson, how are you employed?

14

A.

I am self-employed.

15

Q.

What is your business?

16

A.

I own a couple of businesses.

17

Consulting Group, L.L.C.

18

Valley Partners.

19

and I am also a partner in Detroit Credit Card ATM

20

Processing, L.L.C.

21

One is Jackson

I am also a partner in Paradise

I am a partner in Queen Lillian, L.L.C.,

THE COURT:

Pull the mike a little closer to you.

22

The chair doesn't move so we have to move the mike or the

23

body.

24

BY MR. GARDEY:

25

Q.

Where are you from originally?

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

A.

Detroit, Michigan.

Q.

Were you born and raised here?

A.

Yes, I was.

Q.

What's your educational background?

A.

Went to grade school here in Detroit, St. Phillips

Lutheran School.

from Cass Tech High School.

received a degree there.

attended the University of Detroit Law School, did not

87

Went to Cass Tech High School, graduated


Went to Howard University,

Upon graduating I actually

10

graduate, did three years there.

11

Q.

Now, after, what do you do after you left law school?

12

A.

While I was in law school, I was actually in law school

13

part time.

14

Councilman Gil Hill.

15

graduating from Howard University.

16

Q.

17

Gil Hill?

18

A.

I believe it was 1991.

19

Q.

Was that Detroit City Council?

20

A.

Yes.

21

Q.

When you started with Councilman Hill's office, what

22

was your position?

23

A.

24

legislative affairs.

25

Q.

I was working in the employ of Detroit City


I started working there upon

What year did you start working for Councilman

At that time I was an administrative assistant handling

How long did you work for Councilman Hill?

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

88

A.

Approximately about eight years, seven years.

Q.

What year did you leave Councilman Hill's?

A.

Somewhere around 1997.

Q.

Did you hold any other positions with Councilman Hill?

A.

Upon my last two years I was his chief of staff.

Q.

What did you do after you left Councilman Hill?

A.

When I left Councilman Hill, I started Jackson

Consulting Group.

and then later as a partner in Monroe Partners, 400 Monroe

10

Associates and then later Monroe Partners, which then later

11

on became one of the 50 percent owners of Greektown Casino,

12

and I was a partner in that company.

13

Q.

14

Consulting approximately in 1987?

15

A.

Yes.

16

Q.

And so you have been working partly as Jackson

17

Consulting from 1997 to the present?

18

A.

Yes.

19

Q.

What kind of work does Jackson consulting do?

20

A.

Jackson Consulting is a government relations consulting

21

firm primarily focusing on assisting clients in the

22

financial sector.

23

Q.

24

did Jackson Consulting do?

25

A.

I also served in a consulting capacity

So did you leave Councilman Hill and start Jackson

How about back in the fall of 2006, what kind of work

2006 or 2007?

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

89

Q.

In 2006.

A.

Well, I did not have Jackson Consulting while I was

still in the employ of --

Q.

I'm sorry, in 2006, not 1996.

A.

I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I thought you said 1996.

Jackson Consulting was again focusing on clients in the

financial arena.

believe that Jackson Consulting had that was outside of the

finance arena that was in the sort of public schools or in

In 2006

At that time there was one client I

10

the schools markets, but for the most part most of

11

Jackson Consulting's clients were in the finance arena.

12

Q.

13

the finance arena, what type of work did you do for your

14

finance clients?

15

A.

16

funds, money management firms, real estate management firms.

17

We primarily do business with Detroit's pension funds, Wayne

18

County's pension fund, as well as other pension funds around

19

the country.

20

Q.

And what kind of work did you do for these clients?

21

A.

I would assist my clients, the asset management clients

22

in actually obtaining asset allocations from pension funds

23

to manage the pension fund's dollars or in the case of hedge

24

funds or private equity funds Jackson Consulting would

25

assist those clients in obtaining dollars that would be

And when you say Jackson Consulting's clients were in

Most of my clients were asset management firms, hedge

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

90

invested into those hedge funds or private equity funds.

Q.

of the Detroit Credit Card Processing Company?

A.

Yes, sir.

Q.

And how long have you owned that company?

A.

Detroit Credit Card/ATM Processing roughly I believe

was started back in 2000/2001.

Q.

And that business was active in 2006?

A.

Yes.

10

Q.

What kind of work does that company do, Detroit Credit

11

Card/ATM Processing?

12

A.

13

has an interest in securing clients, if you will, for credit

14

card processing from businesses, restaurants, entertainment

15

venues and the like.

16

Q.

17

purposes of your credit card processing business?

18

A.

19

Card/ATM Processing's partner was First Independence Bank.

20

Q.

21

credit card transactions that you were handling with either

22

MasterCard or Visa or other banks around the country?

23

A.

Yes.

24

Q.

And how is it you would make money off of your

25

business, the Detroit Credit Card Processing and ATM

Now, you mentioned earlier that you are also the owner

Detroit Credit Card/ATM Processing owns ATM machines,

In 2006 did you have a relationship with a bank for

Yes.

My partner -- or I should say Detroit Credit

And was it First Independence Bank's job to process

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

91

business.

A.

would use an ATM machine we charge a transaction fee.

the credit card processing there is a small transaction fee.

When a person uses a credit card at a point of sale, a place

of business, there is a small transaction fee that is

charged to that company that is actually using the

processing services.

Q.

The ATM business, for every transaction that a customer


For

Now, today, Mr. Jackson, do you have any agreements

10

with the United States Government in connection with your

11

testimony today?

12

A.

Yes, I have an immunity agreement.

13

Q.

Do you have a use immunity agreement with the

14

United States?

15

A.

Yes.

16

Q.

What is your understanding of the terms of that

17

agreement?

18

A.

19

tell the truth.

20

it relates to telling the truth, I will perjure myself.

21

roughly it's to tell the truth.

22

Q.

23

government can use what you say in your testimony today

24

against you at a later criminal proceeding?

25

A.

My understanding of the terms of that agreement is to


If in fact I violate any of those terms as
So

And what is your understanding as to whether or not the

It's my understanding that they cannot.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

92

Q.

And what happens if you lie during your testimony

today?

today against you in a later criminal proceeding?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Now, Mr. Jackson, let me direct your attention back to

the fall of 2006.

Deja Vu Consulting?

A.

Yes, I did.

Q.

And what kind of business is Deja Vu Consulting in?

10

A.

My understanding is that Deja Vu is in the business of

11

adult entertainment.

12

Q.

Is that strip clubs?

13

A.

Yes.

14

Q.

What was the purpose of your work for Deja Vu

15

Consulting?

16

A.

17

actually was back in September of '96.

18

a Renee Pipis, who was another government relations

19

consultant, who asked me to look into working with this

20

group as it relates to transferring a license, an existing

21

license from one owner to a new owner.

22

asked to look at consulting in that regard, that was not

23

necessarily my forte, if you will.

24

practice was more so in the finance arena, but I did agree

25

to look into some due diligence, initial due diligence into

Would the government be able to use your testimony

At that time did you do some work for

I was asked to consider representing Deja Vu.

It

I was approached by

I actually, when I

I informed her that my

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

93

the matter.

Q.

2006?

A.

2006.

Q.

And that was in September 2006?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And you say you were proposed by a Ms. Pipis?

A.

Yes.

Q.

What was your understanding who she was working with?

10

A.

She actually had been consulted or contacted by State

11

Representative Barb Ferrer.

12

represented some downriver communities.

13

her attention the issue of the Deja Vu, and they had

14

previously been turned down as it relates to the transfer of

15

the license maybe back in 2003, and I believe Representative

16

Ferrer contacted Ms. Pipis and asked if this was something

17

that she could assist in, could she help.

18

turn, contacted me.

You said, you testified 1996.

19

Did you mean to say

I'm sorry, sir.

It's my understanding she


She had brought to

Ms. Pipis, in

From there I was given a series of some white

20

papers and other historical documentation relative to the

21

whole license transfer of the ownership from Ms. Pipis as

22

well as some things even faxed to me from Barb Ferrer's

23

office.

24

Q.

25

meetings with people from Deja Vu?

Now, after you were contacted by Ms. Pipis did you have

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

94

A.

Yes, I did.

Q.

Who did you meet with from Deja Vu?

A.

I believe it was Gary Koloszar, Mr. Hall and

Mr. St. John.

Q.

Is that Jim St. John and Joseph Hall?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And what was the purpose of your meeting with Mr. Hall,

Mr. St. John, and Mr. Koloszar?

A.

To get background information on this particular case

10

as part of my due diligence.

I wasn't sure at that time if

11

I would even consider representing them as a consultant, but

12

to get all the information possible.

13

Q.

14

at Deja Vu concerning your working for them?

15

A.

16

had actually proposed, because this was something sort of

17

outside of my general consulting practice, that my interest

18

was to -- versus a basic consulting arrangement, I was

19

looking for being able to grow my credit card/ATM processing

20

business and so I had proposed to them that sort of in lieu

21

of consulting fees being able to do business, if I assisted

22

them, to be able to do business either having ATM machines

23

in their various facilities around the country as well as

24

credit card processing business.

25

Q.

Did you come to any kind of agreement with the people

We actually had come to a verbal agreement of sorts.

And would that have been a significant investment or

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

95

was that of significant worth to you in your credit card

processing company if you had been able to get that from

Deja Vu?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Did they also offer you an opportunity to buy an

option, an ownership interest in the Deja Vu facility in

Detroit?

A.

those gentlemen as it relates to an ownership interest in

Yes.

Later on there were discussions with myself and

10

the Deja Vu Detroit property.

11

Q.

12

Deja Vu?

13

A.

14

interest in being in the strip club business.

15

focused on the credit cart processing business and the ATM

16

business.

17

Q.

18

strip club business?

19

A.

20

great idea, but it was just not something that I truly had

21

a lot of experience in.

22

business, if you will, in the gaming business, and I had

23

just actually transitioned out of that business and had sold

24

my interest not long prior to this.

25

just, really more so focused on growing my ATM and credit

Were you interested in getting an ownership interest in

That was not really my interest.

I really had no
I was more so

Why weren't you interested in being a part owner of a

Well, I don't think my wife would have thought it was a

I had been in the entertainment

And so I was really

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

96

card processing business.

Q.

that with 400 Monroe Partnership?

A.

Partners had a 50 percent ownership interest in Greektown

Casino.

Q.

Greektown Casino?

A.

And you mentioned you had an interest in gaming.

Was

Yes 400 Monroe later became Monroe Partners, and Monroe

But at the time in 2006 you had sold your interest in

Yes.

I actually had made provisions to sell my

10

interest, yes.

11

Q.

12

what was your understanding of what you were supposed to do

13

for Deja Vu?

14

A.

15

make contact with the City, in particular the City's Law

16

Department.

17

the counsel for the City of Detroit, to do some initial due

18

diligence as to what was the City's legal position as

19

relates to the transfer of the license.

20

shared with me that if in fact the license was not

21

transferred they were going to continue on with their

22

litigation against the City of Detroit in federal court on

23

some constitutional grounds as relates to the denial of the

24

transfer.

25

to find out in fact if the City felt that it was from a

Based on your meetings with Mr. Hall and Mr. St. John,

My understanding was to, one, the first step was to

I did contact John Johnson at the time, who was

The gentleman had

So the first step was to talk with John Johnson

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

97

legal perspective prudent to effectuate the transfer.

Next was to --

Q.

Well, first let me ask a couple of questions about

that.

A.

Sure.

Q.

So in September of 2006 it was your understanding that

there was ongoing litigation between Deja Vu and the City of

Detroit about Deja Vu opening a club in Greektown in the

City of Detroit?

10

A.

Yes.

11

Q.

And you were to try to convince the City Council and

12

the City to grant the license instead of proceeding with the

13

litigation; is that correct?

14

A.

Yes.

15

Q.

Now, you said you met with Mr. Johnson from the City of

16

Detroit Law Department?

17

A.

18

meeting scheduled.

19

meeting.

20

relative to the issue, and it appeared to me that he did

21

understand some of the legal issues and potential

22

culpability that the City may have if in fact there were --

23

if Deja Vu prevailed on the litigation.

24

Q.

25

have any understanding as to whether Deja Vu had met with

Yeah, I actually contacted Mr. Johnson.

We had a

Something came up the day of the

We did talk by phone and had some conversation

Now, before Deja Vu started working with you did you

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

98

any of the members of the City Council?

A.

council prior to that.

Q.

Council in order to convince them to approve the license for

Deja Vu?

A.

Yes, I arranged a number of meetings.

Q.

What meetings did you arrange?

A.

I believe the first meeting we had was with Barbara,

10

I had not.

I don't think I knew they had met with

Did you arrange any meetings with members of City

Councilwoman Barbara Rose Collins.

11

I don't know the exact order, but I know we met

12

with Councilwoman Sheila Cockrel.

We met with Councilwoman

13

Martha Reeves.

14

Alberta Tinsley-Talabi.

15

Councilman Cockrel, but we did not, could not get a meeting

16

scheduled, and I had also spoken with Councilwoman

17

Monica Conyers and had a meeting scheduled.

18

Q.

19

try to set up a meeting with Deja Vu?

20

A.

Yes.

21

Q.

Now, these meetings that you talked about with these

22

other councilpeople, who was at those meetings?

23

A.

From a staff standpoint or from?

24

Q.

From Deja Vu.

25

A.

Deja Vu.

We met with Cockrel, Reeves, Councilwoman


I had spoken with a staff member of

So did you reach out to Councilwoman Monica Conyers to

I believe Joe Hall was at all of the

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

99

meetings.

I believe Mr. St. John was at all or at most of

the meetings as well.

Q.

these members of the City Council to approve the transfer of

the license so that they could open their club?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And the members of the City Council you met with, were

they receptive to your request?

A.

And were you trying to work with Deja Vu to convince

In most cases they were able to separate the emotional

10

component of a strip club and the entertainment side of it

11

from the legal issue, which was that the license, the

12

cabaret D license already existed at that particular

13

location and this was just a matter of a transfer of

14

ownership and so that they could not stop that location from

15

having a license.

16

initially did not fully understand that, but it seemed like

17

after our meetings that that became clear and that this was

18

really not a morality issue, but it was really more of a

19

legal issue.

20

Q.

21

could face damages from the litigation if they went forward

22

with the litigation?

23

A.

24

same type of cases have occurred and that I believe Deja Vu

25

had even been involved in litigation in other parts of the

And many of them, many of them maybe

Did you also discuss the possibility that the City

We shared with them in those meetings that these very

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

100

country with other major cities and those cities had lost in

these type of transfer cases and there were significant

damages and that in this case what we tried to prevail on

them is that it was better to move forward or allow the

transfer versus putting the City in harm's way.

Q.

meet with you or who you believed were against the transfer

of the license?

A.

Yes.

10

Q.

And who were those?

11

A.

We were not able to arrange a meeting with Ken Cockrel.

12

We were not able to arrange a meeting with Councilman

13

Kenyatta or Councilwoman Watson.

14

does that leave?

15

Were there some members of City Council who would not

I'm trying to think who

All of the people we met with we were -- were the

16

ones we felt were receptive.

I think those were three that

17

we were not able to arrange a meeting with.

18

Councilwoman Jones, we were not able to arrange a meeting

19

with Councilwoman Jones.

20

Q.

21

Monica Conyers?

22

A.

23

would have gone through with the other council members.

24

Q.

25

the people from Deja Vu?

And I am sorry,

Why did you want to meet with Councilwoman

To be able to go through the same issues with her as we

Did you actually set up meetings with Ms. Conyers and

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

101

A.

Yes, we did have a meeting scheduled.

Q.

Did you meet with her?

A.

No, I did not meet with her.

Q.

Why is that?

A.

I either ran into her or either received a phone call,

I cannot recall exactly how it came about, but I did talk

with her and she had shared with me that she was not able to

make the appointment, that I was still supposed to, should

still come to her office and that I would be meeting with

10

somewhere there at her office.

11

Q.

12

Mrs. Conyers or her husband?

13

A.

14

a consultant, being in city hall, being involved in city

15

government.

16

Q.

17

cancelled the meeting.

18

A.

19

instructed.

20

office with Mr. Sam Riddle to discuss.

21

that he was there to receive me to discuss the issues

22

relative to Deja Vu.

23

Q.

24

with Sam Riddle?

25

A.

Had you had any prior contact, relationship with

I had had contact with her just in my regards of being

Now, you said you ran into Ms. Conyers and she had
What happened next?

Well, the meeting -- or I still went to her office as


When I got to her office, I met in her actual
It was understood

Did Ms. Conyers tell you why she wanted you to meet

That he was her representative.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

102

Q.

And at that time what was your understanding of the

relationship between Sam Riddle and Monica Conyers?

A.

rumors sort of out in the consulting community, you know,

out throughout Detroit that, you know, that there was a

relationship between Ms. Conyers and Mr. Riddle.

one time --

At that time it was a little unclear.

MR. WISHNOW:

THE COURT:

I had heard some

I know at

I'll object to this, Your Honor.

Well, he's answered the question.

10

Let's wait for the next question.

11

BY MR. GARDEY:

12

Q.

13

whether Mr. Riddle held any position within Ms. Conyers'

14

office?

15

A.

16

time he had been her campaign manager.

17

sure if that was -- I would assume that was the capacity

18

that he was in on that day.

19

Q.

20

Mr. Riddle --

Mr. Jackson, did you have any understanding as to

I know at one time he was her chief of staff.

At one

I was not exactly

Now, the day you met with Mr. Riddle -- is

21

Do you know Mr. Riddle?

22

A.

Yes.

23

Q.

Is he here in the courtroom?

24

A.

Yes.

25

Q.

Could you please point him out and describe something

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

he's wearing?

A.

103

He has on an argyle sweater and a blazer.

MR. GARDEY:

Let the record reflect that the

witness has identified the defendant, Mr. Riddle.

BY MR. GARDEY:

Q.

her personal office?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Now, each member of the City Council has offices in the

Now, you said you met with Mr. Riddle in Ms. Conyers',

10

City/County Building; is that correct?

11

A.

That is correct.

12

Q.

And within those offices there is an office for,

13

personal office for the City Council members; is that

14

correct?

15

A.

Yes.

16

Q.

And you met with Mr. Riddle in her actual office?

17

A.

Yes.

18

Q.

And Ms. Conyers was not present?

19

A.

No.

20

Q.

Where did you sit within the office?

21

A.

There is a small round conference table in her office.

22

We both sat at the conference table.

23

Q.

Was anybody else present beside you and Mr. Riddle?

24

A.

No.

25

Q.

And some time ago you had been an intern for

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

104

Mrs. Conyers' husband?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And when was that?

A.

Back in the spring of '87 roughly through about '99.

Maybe spring of '99.

Q.

Is that spring of '87 to '89?

A.

I'm sorry, '89, '89, yes.

Q.

Is that when you were in college?

A.

Yes, when I was at Howard University.

10

Q.

Why did you go to the meeting with Mr. Riddle without

11

anyone from Deja Vu?

12

A.

13

principal and we were meeting with a staff person, a little

14

bit not sure exactly what direction that meeting was going

15

and I thought it was best that I meet with him myself.

16

Q.

17

with Ms. Conyers, had you planned to have someone from

18

Deja Vu with you at that meeting?

19

A.

Yes.

20

Q.

Now, at that meeting in Mrs. Conyers' office did

21

Mr. Riddle tell you or say anything about what his current

22

relationship was with Mrs. Conyers?

23

A.

24

that myself because of the rumors I have heard out there.

25

He shared with me, you know, that, it may not be an exact

Because we were not meeting with what I considered the

And if you had met, when you had scheduled a meeting

I, I actually was, you know, a little curious about

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

105

quote, but, you know, that they couldn't necessarily always

get along.

said that, you know, he was her chief of staff but that they

had to have a different relationship.

Q.

office with Mr. Riddle?

A.

started out the meeting.

me to read.

I think he might have used the word crazy.

He

What happened during your meeting in Mrs. Conyers'

Well, we talked about a number of things.

I believe he

He suggested a couple of books for

I'm not sure how we got on that subject.

10

know one was A State of Denial and the other one was -- I

11

can't recall what the second book was off the top of my

12

head.

13

We talked about a gentleman who actually worked in

14

Councilman Gil Hill's office, Greg Robinson.

He asked me

15

about his work ethic.

16

considering hiring him or either he had been hired, I am not

17

sure if he was in her employ at that time, but wanting to

18

know sort of as a reference or referral what did I think of

19

them hiring him.

20

Q.

21

from Gil Hill's office when you worked for Gil Hill; is that

22

correct?

23

A.

Yes.

24

Q.

And Mr. Riddle was asking you basically as a reference.

25

What is your understanding as to whether Mr. Robinson was

I guess he or Mrs. Conyers was

Mr. Riddle asked you about a Greg Robinson who you knew

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

106

applying for work with Mrs. Conyers' office?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And after talking about books and the reference for

Mr. Robinson, did you talk about the Deja Vu issue?

A.

Yes, we did.

Q.

What did Mr. Riddle say about that?

A.

It seems to me that he understood the legal issues that

were at hand.

having been to law school, he seemed to understand the legal

Mr. Riddle, you know, being an attorney or

10

issues.

He thought that it was something that possibly

11

could be something that she may be able to support, and we

12

had agreed that we would get together outside of the office

13

to discuss it further.

14

Q.

15

Mrs. Conyers' office to discuss it further?

16

A.

17

Management business that we were sort of switching into more

18

a discussion as a consultant that it would probably be more

19

prudent to discuss that somewhere else.

20

Q.

What did Mr. Riddle say about Meridian Management?

21

A.

Meridian Management was a consulting firm that he had,

22

and Meridian Management was an entity that, you know, might

23

be able to -- that he suggested that could help in this

24

regard.

25

Q.

Did he say why he wanted to meet with you outside of

I got the impression that because he had a Meridian

Did you arrange to have a second meeting with

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

107

Mr. Riddle after that first meeting at Mrs. Conyers' office?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Where did that meeting, the second meeting take place?

A.

That meeting took place at the Click Restaurant.

Q.

Where is the Click Restaurant?

A.

Click is on East Jefferson just east of I-75 freeway on

the south side of Jefferson.

Q.

Mrs. Conyers' office, was that in October of 2006?

Now, this first meeting with Mr. Riddle in

10

A.

I believe that sounds right, yes.

11

Q.

Now, how soon after your first meeting did you have a

12

second meeting with Mr. Riddle at the Click?

13

A.

I don't believe it was too long, days.

14

Q.

Was it breakfast, lunch?

15

A.

It was a breakfast meeting.

16

Q.

And who was there at that second meeting?

17

A.

At that meeting it was just myself and Mr. Riddle.

18

Q.

Now, what did you discuss with Mr. Riddle at the

19

meeting at Click?

20

A.

21

Meridian Management.

22

commercial, if you will, of the accomplishments of Meridian

23

Management or himself.

24

successes there in Colorado after that tragedy in assisting

25

I believe families there.

What kind of meeting was it?

At the meeting at the Click there was more focus on


Sam went into sort of a, what I call a

He talked about Columbine and his

He talked about some of the work

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

108

he had done with Meridian and that -- the value that he

could add, that if in fact if Meridian was brought into this

that Meridian could help, help us secure support from

Councilwoman Conyers.

Q.

hire Meridian Management in order to get Mrs. Conyers' vote?

A.

Yes.

Q.

What did he say?

A.

He laid out a couple of scenarios, one being that

Did Mr. Riddle say whether or not Deja Vu would have to

10

Meridian -- if in fact we didn't have Meridian, and clearly

11

I think he had done some due diligence and saw that, took

12

the temperature where the council was and where sort of the

13

splits were and where the various councilpeople were going

14

to be voting one way or another and that her vote was sort

15

of a key vote and Meridian would be necessary in order to

16

secure her vote which probably could be the key swing vote.

17

Q.

18

hire Meridian Management?

19

A.

Did Mr. Riddle say what would happen if Deja Vu did not

Well, I got the impression that --

20

MR. WISHNOW:

21

THE COURT:

22

MR. WISHNOW:

23
24
25

Objection, Your Honor.

Wait a minute.
I'm sorry, he's talking about his

impression.
THE COURT:

The question was:

Did Mr. Riddle say

what would happen if Deja Vu did not hire Meridian?

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Did he

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

say something?

Not your impression.

THE WITNESS:

THE COURT:

THE WITNESS:

109

Did he say something?

Yes.

What did he say?


We wouldn't get Monica Conyers'

support.

THE COURT:

Go ahead.

BY MR. GARDEY:

Q.

And what would happen if Deja Vu did not hire Meridian?

A.

We would not get the councilwoman's support.

In

10

addition to that, she could actively work against us getting

11

support even from other people, that she would work actively

12

against Deja Vu.

13

Q.

14

what Monica Conyers would do to act actively against the

15

Deja Vu project if Meridian wasn't hired?

16

A.

17

our conversation.

18

discussion also went into a maintenance contract, if you

19

will, and that was an ongoing relationship with Meridian

20

Management, that if in fact the transfer did occur there was

21

going to be a need for ongoing consultation because

22

establishments of that type could also run into problems

23

with zoning and licensing and the actual employees of those

24

facilities could be ticketed or the facility itself could be

25

ticketed and there would be a need or should be, there

Did Mr. Riddle describe at this meeting at the Click

Well, that could happen in a couple of ways based on


One, if in fact Deja Vu and I guess our

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

110

probably could be a need and you want to be preventive in

that regard from any of that occurring.

Q.

Did you take that as a threat?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Why is that?

A.

I took it as a threat because council president pro tem

I believe at that time having influence that there are many

gray areas as it relates to those type of establishments and

that if, using her influence, be it with City officials,

10

police department, that kind of thing, that if an elected

11

official really has an issue with a place that operates what

12

I call sort of in the gray there is a possibility that

13

places could be ticketed and there could be retribution.

14

Q.

15

hire Meridian Consulting to get the vote, get the vote of

16

Mrs. Conyers at the City Council's vote on the transfer of

17

the license; is that correct?

18

A.

Yes.

19

Q.

And then, secondly, he also wanted Deja Vu to hire

20

Meridian on a continuing basis going forward at the time to

21

protect Deja Vu from Mrs. Conyers?

22

A.

Yes.

23

Q.

Did Mr. Riddle give you a price for what he wanted from

24

Deja Vu?

25

A.

So Mr. Riddle had offered -- first he wanted Deja Vu to

$25,000.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

111

Q.

staff to Gil Hill did you ever act as a consultant on a

matter that was pending before the City Council?

A.

No.

Q.

Why not?

A.

You cannot wear two hats at the same time.

have -- you can't be advising --

MR. WISHNOW:

Now, when, back in the '90's when you were the chief of

I'll object to the basis for this

witness' opinion as to that without a proper foundation.

10

THE COURT:

11

MR. WISHNOW:

12

area.

13

one.

What foundation do you want laid?


Whatever expertise he has in this

I believe when you talk about gray areas that may be


He's giving his opinion.

14

THE COURT:

15

BY MR. GARDEY:

16

Q.

The objection is overruled.

Go ahead.

Mr. Jackson --

17
18

You can't

MR. GARDEY:

I don't know if he had already

answered the question.

19

THE COURT:

No.

Start over.

20

BY MR. GARDEY:

21

Q.

22

staff for Gil Hill, a member of Detroit City Council; is

23

that correct?

24

A.

Yes.

25

Q.

And while you served for Mr. Hill did you ever take on

Mr. Jackson, back in the '90's you were the chief of

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

112

consulting work or other work pending before the City

Council?

A.

No.

Q.

And why didn't you do that at that time?

A.

It was a conflict of interest.

office of an elected official advising that person as

relates to decisions that they make and at the same time

represent individuals who are doing business or who are

asking or looking for support or guidance as relates to

You cannot work in the

10

those decisions and so I understood that there was a line

11

there that either you work in the public sector or you are

12

in the private sector.

13

councilman's office and I started a consulting firm and did

14

use my, you know, background in government affairs outside

15

of government.

16

Q.

17

wanted $25,000 at the Click Restaurant, and based on your

18

experience as the chief of staff for a City Councilman and

19

later as a consultant, what was your opinion as to the price

20

of $25,000?

21

A.

I thought it was excessive.

22

Q.

In fact, did you hire anyone else to assist your work

23

for Deja Vu in the fall of 2006?

24

A.

Yes.

25

Q.

Who was that?

That is why I left when I left the

Now, you testified that Mr. Riddle had said that he

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

113

A.

Adolph Mongo.

Q.

And who is Adolph Mongo?

A.

Adolph Mongo is a government relations marketing

consultant here in Detroit.

Q.

Deja Vu work in the fall of 2006?

A.

$1,500.

Q.

Did Mr. Mongo have any experience in connection to

strip clubs and their business before the City Council in

And what did you pay Mr. Mongo to assist you with the

10

Detroit?

11

A.

12

Mr. Mongo had previously represented one, if not maybe

13

two other clubs, if you will, relative to the same issue of

14

a transfer of a license from one owner to another.

15

been successful in his endeavor to do that.

16

so after the fact I learned this later on and so I thought

17

it could be prudent as a subcontractor to hire Mr. Mongo to

18

assist me since he had previously talked to councilpeople

19

and had been able to lay out that case, make a forthright

20

case as it relates to the transfer, the legal issues of law.

21

Q.

22

your knowledge of Mr. Riddle, did Mr. Riddle have any

23

experience with adult entertainment licenses and the

24

transfer of such licenses?

25

A.

Actually he did.

It came to my attention that

He had

This was more

And Mr. Riddle, based on what Mr. Riddle told you and

No.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

114

Q.

Based on Mr. Riddle, what Mr. Riddle told you, did you

leave that meeting at the Click with any certainty as to

whether you would get Mrs. Conyers' vote if you hired

Mr. Riddle as a consultant?

A.

support, yes.

Q.

did you set up a meeting between Mr. Riddle and the people

at Deja Vu?

I felt confident that if he was hired we would have her

After your second meeting with Mr. Riddle at the Click,

10

A.

Yes.

I told Mr. Riddle that I needed to consult with

11

the gentlemen who I consulted for and that it would be best

12

for him to meet them as it relates to that request.

13

Q.

14

to get Mrs. Conyers' vote if you were going to win before

15

the City Council?

16

A.

Yes.

17

Q.

And who -- where was that meeting to take place between

18

Deja Vu and Mr. Riddle?

19

A.

20

Michigan Avenue.

21

Q.

And who was present for that meeting?

22

A.

Mr. St. John, Joe Hall and Gary Koloszar.

23

Q.

And how soon after the Click meeting did the meeting at

24

Andiamo's take place?

25

A.

And was that because you believed that it was important

It took place in Andiamo's in Dearborn I believe on

Not very long after.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

115

Q.

Just a few days?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Now, did you go to the meeting in Dearborn with

Mr. Riddle or separately?

A.

I believe we were separate.

Q.

And what happened at the meeting?

A.

I believe Mr. Riddle may have come in a little late.

He came into the meeting.

Q.

How was he dressed at the meeting?

10

A.

From what I recall, he had maybe University of Michigan

11

paraphernalia on.

12

way to the Michigan-Ohio State football game in Columbus, if

13

I'm not mistaken.

14

He --

I believe he had -- he said he was on his

Mr. Riddle came, he talked about, again, the value

15

of hiring Meridian Management.

Meridian Management, again,

16

sort of the accolades of his company and their

17

accomplishments and what he had done in Colorado and in this

18

case what he can do in order to secure Councilwoman Conyers'

19

support or her vote.

20

Q.

21

secure Mrs. Conyers' vote?

22

A.

23

secured.

24

Q.

And how much did he ask for getting her vote?

25

A.

$25,000.

What did Mr. Riddle say as to whether or not he could

He told us that by hiring him that her vote could be

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

116

Q.

Did Mr. Riddle talk at all as to whether the vote was

going to be close or not close?

A.

way the council had lined up that, you know, without her

vote they would probably not prevail.

Q.

Mr. Riddle say anything about what Mrs. Conyers would do if

Deja Vu did not hire Mr. Riddle?

A.

He made it clear that she was a swing vote, that the

Now, at the meeting at Andiamo's with Deja Vu did

Well, that we would not get her support and that in

10

fact she could work against us.

11

Q.

12

that as a threat?

13

A.

Yes.

14

Q.

During the meeting at Andiamo's did Mr. Riddle ask

15

about the merits of the transfer of the license from

16

Deja Vu?

17

A.

Could you just clarify what you mean by the merits?

18

Q.

Did Mr. Riddle ask any questions about what the project

19

would mean or if the club opened in Detroit what would

20

happen or what the benefits of having the transfer of the

21

license would be?

22

A.

23

the case, but we didn't get into a lot of detail.

24
25

Did you, based on what Mr. Riddle said, did you take

There may have been just some general discussion about

THE COURT:

Bring the mike a little closer.

are letting your voice drop slightly, please.

You

Thank you.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

117

BY MR. GARDEY:

Q.

Ms. Conyers' vote, what was the reaction or what happened at

the meeting?

A.

were surprised, taken off guard.

that that was, one, excessive, just buying -- they looked at

it as if it was buying a vote.

After Mr. Riddle quoted the price of $25,000 for

The gentlemen, they were -- I guess the best word, they

MR. WISHNOW:

10

THE COURT:

They, I guess they felt

Objection, Your Honor.

No, you can't say what they looked at.

11

The question -- what was your question?

12

BY MR. GARDEY:

13

Q.

14

Mr. Riddle's request?

15

A.

They were surprised.

16

Q.

During the meeting did they agree to hire him or not

17

hire him?

18

A.

No, they did not want to hire him.

19

Q.

What happened?

20

A.

Pretty abruptly.

21

Sam.

22

dialogue.

23

much left out, well, you know, it's, basically, you know,

24

this is it, you know, this is the deal and you take it or

25

leave it.

What was the reaction of the people at Deja Vu to

How did the meeting end?


They were not supportive of hiring

They didn't want to really continue on with any more


Sam had his football game to get to and pretty

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

118

Q.

Did Mr. Riddle leave at that point?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Did you have further discussions with Deja Vu at the

Andiamo's Restaurant after Mr. Riddle left?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Did you make any proposal to the Deja Vu people

regarding Mr. Riddle?

A.

I proposed that Jackson Consulting could hire

Well, I saw their discomfort in contracting Sam and so

10

Meridian Management as a subcontractor, and that would sort

11

of keep their hands clean, if you will, and they would not

12

have any direct involvement with him but that I at that

13

point felt that without hiring Meridian we would not secure

14

Councilwoman Conyers' vote and their transfer would not

15

happen.

16

Q.

What did Deja Vu say to your proposal?

17

A.

They did not support it.

18

Q.

Based on what Mr. Riddle said to you at the meeting at

19

Andiamo's, did you feel that you were being shaken down by

20

Mr. Riddle?

21

A.

Yes.

22

Q.

And what do you understand, when I say shake down, what

23

do you mean?

24

A.

25

pay the $25,000 in order to get the vote of Councilwoman

What do you understand that to mean?

I was being pressured to have to in one way or another

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

119

Conyers.

Q.

the Deja Vu people, did the license transfer issue come up

for a vote in the Detroit City Council?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And did that take place on November 15, 2006?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And what was the vote?

A.

The transfer was not approved.

Now, after the meeting at Andiamo's with Mr. Riddle and

It was denied.

10

believe it was 5 to 4.

11

Q.

And how did Mrs. Conyers vote?

12

A.

She voted against the transfer.

13

Q.

And after the request to transfer the license was

14

defeated, what was your reaction?

15

A.

16

time and effort since September to meet with various council

17

people, meet with the representatives of the Law Department

18

or at least talk to them to lay out the repercussions of not

19

transferring and what in fact was the City's liability.

20

Personally I had invested a lot of time and energy into it,

21

had no retainer from the Deja Vu group or HDV, and so at

22

that point felt that that was a lot of work down the drain.

23

Q.

24

voting down of the license, what impact did that have on

25

your business for credit card processing?

How did you feel?

Somewhat dejected, if you will.

I had put in a lot of

And what impact did the loss of the license or the

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

120

A.

Well, I could have spent a lot of time going after

business in other areas.

on the value of potentially securing this as a customer.

Q.

a share of the credit card processing at Deja Vu, would that

have been significant financially for you?

A.

Very lucrative, yes.

Q.

After the vote of 5-4 at the City Council, did you have

further contact with Sam Riddle?

I had put, had sort of put a lot

And if the license had gone through and you had gotten

10

A.

Yes.

11

Q.

What happened?

12

A.

Mr. Riddle and I, we met.

13

upon myself.

14

hiring him directly.

15

if they got the transfer and they didn't have to know all of

16

the details on how it came about and if I hired him as a

17

subcontractor that, you know, everybody would be happy.

18

I met with Sam Riddle and had agreed to contract

19

Meridian Management, for Jackson Consulting to contract

20

Meridian Management.

21

Q.

22

additional meeting with Mr. Riddle about Jackson Consulting

23

hiring Mr. Riddle and Meridian Management?

24

A.

25

still a way that there could be a reconsideration.

At that point I had taken it

I knew that the Deja Vu group did not support


I felt that as far as if they would --

So

Now, how was it that after the vote you had this

Well, I talked to Mr. Riddle.

He felt that there was

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

There is

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

121

a certain period of time after a vote that a councilperson

could reconsider.

the clerk's office for reconsideration and that if in fact

that could be a sign, if you will, of certainly his

effectiveness in that he could get her to reconsider.

Q.

And that's what Mr. Riddle offered to do for you?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And what price was he asking?

A.

It was $25,000.

10

Q.

And was this soon after the vote in the City Council?

11

A.

Yes.

12

Q.

Where the license went down?

13

A.

Yes.

14

Q.

So you agreed to -- did you agree to pay the 25,000?

15

A.

No.

16

would pay him a success fee.

17

would give him the retainer and that if upon -- because the

18

reconsideration was just one piece of it, bringing it back

19

to the table, then once it came back to the table there

20

would be another City Council vote in order to do the

21

transfer.

22

Q.

23

"we" we are talking about?

24

A.

Well, me and Sam, but that was my proposal.

25

Q.

And what was the amount of the retainer that you and

They could actually put in a letter to

I told Sam that I would pay him a retainer and I


And so we had decided that I

When you say we decided to do a retainer, who is the

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

122

Mr. Riddle agreed to?

A.

15,000.

Q.

with the $10,000?

A.

The reconsideration.

Q.

And how about for the 15,000?

A.

The successful vote as it relates to the transfer of

the license.

The retainer was $10,000.

The success fee would be

And so what was your understanding what you were buying

10

Q.

11

two checks?

12

A.

Yes.

13

Q.

Where was it that you met him?

14

A.

I believe we met at the Click again.

15
16

Did you meet with Mr. Riddle and deliver him those

THE COURT:

Excuse me.

You gave him two checks at

the same time?

17

THE WITNESS:

Yes.

One -- I'm not sure if it was

18

post dated, but I told him one was, one actually I put in

19

the memo section was for a retainer, and the other was

20

supposed to be cashed upon the successful vote.

21

THE COURT:

Thank you.

22

BY MR. GARDEY:

23

Q.

24

evidence as Government's Exhibit 22B.

25

Mr. Jackson, I'm handing you what's been entered into

THE COURT:

B?

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

MR. GARDEY:

123

22B as in boy and 22D as in Delta.

BY MR. GARDEY:

Q.

identify what they are.

A.

Meridian Management Systems dated 11-16, 2006 for $10,000.

The memo section says consulting services retainer.

Q.

And is this the retainer amount that you said was meant to

Would you please take a look at those two documents and


First 22B.

22B is a check from Jackson Consulting Group, L.L.C. to

That's down in the lower left-hand corner of the check.

10

pay for Mrs. Conyers' reconsideration vote?

11

A.

12

Yes.
MR. GARDEY:

Okay.

Could you enlarge the back of

13

the check.

14

BY MR. GARDEY:

15

Q.

16

of the $10,000 check, what's the stamp on the right side of

17

the back of the check?

18

A.

19

Michigan 48207," there is an account number, "For Deposit

20

Only, Meridian Management Systems."

21

Q.

And would you please look at 22D as in Delta.

22

A.

A check from Jackson Consulting Group, L.L.C. to

23

Meridian Management Systems dated 11-16-06 for $15,000.

24

the memo section it says, "Consulting."

25

Q.

And what's the, on the back of the check, Mr. Jackson,

It says, "Pay to the order of Comerica Bank, Detroit,

So the $10,000 was for Mrs. Conyers to file for

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

In

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

124

reconsideration, and the $15,000 was a success fee if the

license transfer actually was voted successfully in the City

Council; is that correct?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Did you ask Mr. Riddle anything about the second check

for $15,000?

A.

At that time?

Q.

Yes.

anything?
Yes.

Did you ask him to do anything with it or not do

10

A.

I told him that that should be deposited later,

11

anticipating that once the vote had occurred and the

12

councilwoman had supported the transfer then that check

13

would be deposited as a success fee.

14

Q.

15

checks had Mr. Riddle made any -- what did Mr. Riddle want

16

in connection with the 25,000?

17

A.

Well, he wanted the whole $25,000.

18

Q.

He wanted all 25,000 up front?

19

A.

Yes, yes.

20

Q.

And before you paid those two checks over to Mr. Riddle

21

did you get approval from Deja Vu in any way?

22

A.

No.

23

Q.

What happened after you gave Mr. Riddle those

24

two checks?

25

A.

Now, before you proposed the idea of two separate

I believe later on that day there was a letter that

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

125

went into the city clerk's office from Councilwoman Conyers

for the reconsideration of the transfer.

understanding to get it back onto the docket for Council to

vote.

Q.

Would you please take a look at that and state what it is.

A.

Council President Pro Tem Monica Conyers, date November 17,

2006, regarding reconsideration of vote on resolutions A and

10

B on the petition of HDV-Greektown, L.L.C. (Petition Number

11

1392) to transfer ownership with dance entertainment and

12

topless activity permit from K & P, Inc. at 414 E.

13

Congress."

14

Q.

15

about?

16

A.

Yes.

17

Q.

And based on your experience as a chief of staff for

18

City Council, what was your understanding of how

19

reconsideration would work and who could bring such a

20

request?

21

A.

22

take place by someone on the prevailing, the winning side.

23

So if you wanted to reconsider within the period of time

24

that is allowed for reconsideration that you would notify

25

the City Clerk in writing of your intention or your intent

So that's my

Mr. Jackson, I'm handing you Government's Exhibit 23.

"Memorandum to Janice M. Winfrey, City Clerk, from

Mr. Jackson is this the reconsideration that you spoke

My understanding was that a reconsideration could only

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

126

to reconsider in writing.

Q.

necessarily a declaration that the person is going to change

their vote, just that they are going to reconsider; is that

correct?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Did Mr. Riddle say anything to you about the

reconsideration filed by Mrs. Conyers?

A.

And the, this notice of reconsideration, it's not

He told me that, that that certainly would show some

10

good will as relates to the consulting fee, and it also

11

showed that Meridian Management could follow through on what

12

it promised.

13

Q.

14

vote when you were giving him the checks, did Mr. Riddle

15

ever suggest that he was ever going to try to get other City

16

Council members besides Mrs. Conyers to change their vote?

17

A.

No.

18

Q.

Was there any doubt in your mind, Mr. Jackson, you were

19

paying Mr. Riddle for Monica Conyers' vote?

20

A.

No.

21

Q.

Other than your payment of the two checks, $10,000 and

22

$15,000, was there anything else that occurred in connection

23

to Deja Vu and the issue before the City Council before

24

Mrs. Conyers filed her notice of reconsideration?

25

A.

During your discussions with Mr. Riddle right after the

Can you clarify as far as what may have occurred?

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

I'm

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

127

sorry.

Q.

were there other meetings of the City Council or were there

other presentations?

A.

No.

Q.

After she filed the notice of reconsideration was there

another meeting of the Detroit City Council?

A.

No.

Q.

After the reconsideration?

10

A.

Yes.

11

Q.

And what happened at that meeting?

12

A.

At that meeting there were a number of people from the

13

community, a number of very prominent ministers, members of

14

their congregation.

15

Q.

Were you present for that meeting?

16

A.

Yes.

17

Q.

And what was the purpose of that meeting in the City

18

Council?

19

A.

20

reconsideration and to have a new vote.

21

Q.

22

Mrs. Conyers filed for reconsideration?

23

A.

24

I'm not sure of the exact date.

25

Q.

Was there any -- before she filed for reconsideration

The purpose of that meeting was to take up the

And did that meeting take place the day after

I'm not sure if it was the day after or two days after.

Soon thereafter?

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

128

A.

Yes, sir.

Q.

Now, you said that pastors and other people appeared

before the City Council.

A.

to give testimony as relates to their disapproval of any

reconsideration.

denied previously, and they wanted that vote to stand.

had moral objections to a cabaret D license, and they

pressed those objections at that meeting.

What happened?

They were allowed to testify and speak at the Council,

They were happy that the transfer had been


They

10

Q.

Is it fair to say there was political opposition to

11

providing a license to Deja Vu?

12

A.

Yes.

13

Q.

And during the meeting how did Mrs. Conyers react?

14

A.

Mrs. Conyers appeared to be very intimidated.

15

not willing to or did not interact very much with the

16

ministers.

17

didn't -- of course, a lot of the testimony was directed at

18

her because she was the councilperson who had actually asked

19

for the reconsideration.

20

Q.

21

end of that meeting?

22

A.

23

another councilperson, I believe it was her, asked that the

24

matter be tabled.

25

Q.

She was

She didn't say very much at that meeting.

She

And at the -- what happened with Mrs. Conyers at the


What happened?

At the end of the meeting either it was Mrs. Conyers or

And what does that mean?

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

Tabled.

129

A.

They were -- I believe it was the last meeting

before council was to recess for the year, and tabled means

that the matter is no longer -- will not be taken up, that

the vote will not be taken and it was tabled until next year

or until the following year.

Q.

Council that meant that there would be no actual revote on

the issue of the license transfer for Deja Vu until January

of 2007; is that correct?

And so because the matter was tabled in the City

10

A.

That's correct.

11

Q.

And for your purposes what did that mean, what impact

12

did that have on the Deja Vu project and the effort to

13

transfer the license by a method other than litigation?

14

A.

15

but to pursue or move forward with the litigation.

16

Q.

17

second City Council meeting?

18

A.

19

the vote of the councilperson who had reconsidered,

20

Monica Conyers.

21

that he later was not even in town.

22

Flint or somewhere.

23

and so I felt that I did not get the value of the money that

24

I spent.

25

Q.

That meant that it was dead, that they had no option

How did you react about what happened at this

Well, I had hired a consultant to assist in securing

He was not there at the meeting.

Found out

He was in Saginaw or

That was the explanation given to me,

You didn't get your vote?

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

130

A.

No.

Q.

After that did you take any action in connection to the

success fee, the $15,000 check?

A.

Yes.

Q.

What did you do?

A.

And I should say I got the value of my $10,000, but I

didn't get the value or did not warrant the $15,000 success

fee because there was no success.

Q.

What did you do in connection with the $15,000 check?

10

A.

I put a stop payment.

11

Q.

You put a stop payment on it with your bank?

12

A.

Yes.

13

Q.

And you didn't, you didn't do that with the $10,000

14

check because -- did you do that -- you didn't do that with

15

the $10,000 check because you felt you got your vote for

16

reconsideration from Mrs. Conyers?

17

A.

Yes.

18

MR. GARDEY:

19

The government has one brief matter to bring up at

20

Just one moment, Your Honor.

side bar.

21

(At side bar on the record out of the hearing of

22

the jury, as follows:)

23

MR. GARDEY:

Judge, moments before Mr. Jackson

24

took the stand Mr. Wishnow gave me this document.

25

letter of agreement for professional services.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

It's a

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

MR. WISHNOW:

MR. GARDEY:

131

I'm sorry.
And this is a document we have never

seen before and had not been produced by the defense and we

had asked them to produce any documents that they intended

to use as exhibits.

THE COURT:

Do you propose to use this?

MR. WISHNOW:

Actually we are not sure.

to see how the cross develops.

THE COURT:

I'm going

We may not.

Oh, no, you can't use this.

10

an obligation to deliver this in advance.

11

that.

You had

We talked about

You can't sandbag him that way.

12

MR. WISHNOW:

Well, Judge, this is a criminal

13

trial.

It's not a civil trial where the discovery is

14

required, and we are allowed some leeway in providing --

15

THE COURT:

You are not allowed that much leeway,

16

Mr. Wishnow.

17

think this record will reflect both formally and informally

18

the Court telling you to produce your exhibits.

19

of fact, the last conference we had shortly before, I don't

20

know that it's reflected, but you knew this.

21
22

You are not allowed that much, Mr. Wishnow.

MR. WISHNOW:

The objection is noted.

As a matter

We'll move

forward.

23

THE COURT:

What?

24

MR. WISHNOW:

25

THE COURT:

We'll move forward.

I haven't read it.

I don't know what

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

its significance is.

MR. WISHNOW:

THE COURT:

You don't have to.

All right.

(End of discussion at side bar.)

MR. GARDEY:

THE COURT:

MR. WISHNOW:

THE COURT:

Never mind.

10

132

No further questions, Your Honor.


Cross-examine.
Thank you.

Can I see you back here one moment?


Go ahead.

I changed my mind.

The

judge always has that privilege, except at home.

11

Go ahead.

12

MR. WISHNOW:

13

Thank you.
-

14

CROSS-EXAMINATION

15

BY MR. WISHNOW:

16

Q.

17

I'm one of Sam Riddle's attorneys.

18

A.

Good morning.

19

Q.

Edward Wishnow.

20

A.

Wishnow.

21

Q.

Sir, after leaving common council, you started many

22

businesses, including Jackson Consulting, correct?

23

A.

Yes.

24

Q.

And you have indicated that your primary area of

25

interest and expertise was in the finance sector?

Good morning, Mr. Jackson.

My name is Edward Wishnow.


How are you?

I'm sorry, what's your name sir?

Good morning.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

133

A.

Yes.

Q.

In fact, you were involved in putting together the

Greektown Casino deal?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And your group, I think it's called Monroe Partners?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Became a significant -- had a significant ownership

interest in that casino, correct?

A.

Yes.

10

Q.

Anything you've done in the financial sector with

11

clients or prospective investors usually involves some type

12

of, well, not usually, always involves some type of written

13

contract, does it not?

14

A.

Yes.

15

Q.

In this particular situation when you were approached

16

by Deja Vu representatives you did not have a written

17

contract with them, did you?

18

A.

I presented one to them.

19

Q.

You presented a contract to them?

20

A.

Yes.

21

Q.

And they refused to sign it?

22

A.

It was being negotiated, never was signed.

23

Q.

And did that contract ask that you would receive some

24

type of up front fee?

25

A.

I can't recall the exact details of the contract.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

134

Q.

But it most likely did require some up front fee,

correct?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Pardon?

A.

Possibly.

Q.

You don't remember the amount of the retainer involved,

correct?

A.

No.

Q.

But they didn't want to pay that, correct?

10

A.

They gave me a counter to my contract.

11

Q.

And their counter was instead of some up front money

12

some possible reward for you later on by buying into their

13

business?

14

A.

15

or some credit card processing business.

16

Q.

17

interested in giving you a piece of the ATM pie; isn't that

18

correct?

19

A.

That's correct.

20

Q.

Because that was a very significant revenue stream for

21

them?

22

A.

23

relationship with some other entity.

24

Q.

25

get involved in the credit card processing business?

There would be a retainer involved.

As well as sharing in or having access to ATM machine

Well, at some point they told you they weren't

They had already contracted with or already had a

And there was some interest possibly in allowing you to

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

135

A.

Yes.

Q.

And you already had such a business, did you not?

A.

Yes.

Q.

You indicated that at one point you did meet with

Sam Riddle and your first meeting directly with him was at

the Click Restaurant on East Jefferson?

A.

That would have been the second meeting.

Q.

After the meeting in chambers, I'm sorry.

A.

Yes.

10

Q.

And that, you understood, was held outside the office

11

because he was there in his role as a consultant with

12

Meridian Management?

13

A.

The second meeting was held outside the office.

14

Q.

Yes.

15

A.

Yes.

16

Q.

And he was there, as you understood it and as he

17

explain to you, as a consultant with Meridian Management?

18

A.

At the second meeting, yes.

19

Q.

Correct, at the second meeting at Click?

20

A.

Yes.

21

Q.

At some point was a contract submitted to you?

22

A.

I recall that there was a contract, something from

23

Meridian Management.

24

believe there was something emailed to me or either given to

25

me.

I don't actually have it, but I

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

136

Q.

And that, unlike the contract you attempted to have

with HDV/Deja Vu, that contract was not signed, was it?

A.

No.

Q.

That contract that was sent to you from Sam Riddle had

a no conflicts provision in it?

A.

the contract.

Q.

recall now?

I don't recall.

L I don't recall.

I don't remember

You didn't give it much thought or you just don't

10

A.

I just don't recall.

11

Q.

You did not know Sam Riddle very well before your

12

meeting with him, correct?

13

A.

No, I did not.

14

Q.

But you certainly knew of him and that he is a,

15

certainly was a well-known media consultant, a PR person?

16

A.

17

was.

18

people in general.

19

Q.

20

Monica Conyers' campaign?

21

A.

Yes.

22

Q.

That he was involved in the campaigns of others?

23

A.

I was more familiar with his campaign with

24

Monica Conyers.

25

Q.

I knew of him.

I didn't know exactly what his vocation

I knew of him through the media and through other

And did you know that he was involved in

And at your meeting with him he gave you information

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

137

about himself and Meridian, did he not?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Somewhat touting all the good things that he had done

during his career as a consultant?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And some of those were incidents that you were well

aware of, such as Columbine, correct?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And you knew those, you believe those to be true, that

10

he was involved with those instances?

11

A.

12

involved.

13

idea who was representing the family members and that kind

14

of thing.

15

Q.

16

disbelieve that, do you?

17

A.

No.

18

Q.

Before you met with Mr. -- Meridian and Mr. St. John

19

and Mr. Hall at the Andiamo in Dearborn did you have a

20

second meeting with him at your office?

21

A.

With who?

22

Q.

Just Sam Riddle and yourself at your office.

23

A.

I could have.

24

Q.

You could have?

25

A.

Yeah.

Oh, I had no idea if he actually, he himself was


He shared with me that he was.

I had, I had no

And as we sit here today you have no reason to

I'm not sure.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

138

Q.

And would the terms of his engagement with you have

been discussed at that time?

A.

Possibly.

Q.

And would he -- do you -- well, when you met with him

at the Click Restaurant did he discuss with you that he was

there acting as a consultant pursuant to

Meridian Management?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Did you, yourself, tell Mr. Riddle to come to the

10

meeting at the Andiamo's Restaurant?

11

A.

I can't recall exactly how the invitation took place.

12

Q.

Did you tell him who would be there?

13

A.

Oh, I told him the representatives of Deja Vu would be

14

there, yes.

15

Q.

16

that Sam Riddle would be coming to the meeting at the

17

Andiamo's Restaurant?

18

A.

Yes.

19

Q.

So they expected that he would be there?

20

A.

Yes.

21

Q.

And did you explain to them that he was a consultant

22

and had a company called Meridian Management?

23

A.

Yes.

24

Q.

At some point you became rather upset because you had

25

expended some monies and had not gotten anything out of

Okay.

Did you tell either Mr. St. John or Mr. Hall

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

139

Deja Vu, correct?

Well, let me put that in context, excuse me.

Before you gave your $10,000 check to Sam Riddle,

by that time you had expended significant time and energy

into trying to help out Deja Vu Consulting, correct?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And up until then you had not received any

reimbursement, I mean you hadn't received any compensation

for your services, correct?

10

A.

Yes.

11

Q.

And that concerned you, did it not?

12

A.

Yes.

13

Q.

I mean you are a businessman, your time is valuable,

14

correct?

15

A.

Yes.

16

Q.

You, on your own, decided that you would pay $10,000 to

17

Mr. Riddle, correct?

18

A.

Yes.

19

Q.

And that check was made out to Meridian Management, and

20

on the memo line it stated "consulting," correct?

21

A.

Retainer.

22

Q.

And a second check the same day for $15,000 also made

23

out to Meridian?

24

A.

Yes.

25

Q.

During your meetings with Mr. Riddle he explained to

Consulting retainer, correct.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

140

you, did he not, why a consultant would be important in

dealing with a strip club that was trying to locate in

downtown Detroit?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And you accepted those reasons and they were valid,

were they not?

A.

I accepted the reasons that a consultant was needed.

Q.

And I think you have touched upon some of those; that's

not a popular business, there are a lot of what you

10

characterized as gray areas, and government intervention

11

could be of help?

12

A.

You say government intervention could be of help?

13

Q.

Yes.

14

A.

That is not something that I was -- I was getting the

15

services of a nongovernmental entity, Meridian Management.

16

Q.

No, but your -- excuse me.

Let me be more precise.

17

A consultant of yours could intervene with

18

governmental bureaus and departments in this type of

19

context, correct?

20

A.

21

of Meridian Management could do, yes.

22

Q.

23

consulting services was being offered, that is, the context

24

of a strip club being located downtown?

25

A.

That's what was being sold to me in what the services

But you understood the context within which this

I was hiring Meridian Management to assist in getting

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

141

Monica Conyers' vote for the transfer.

Q.

his consulting services could help with other areas involved

with a strip club in downtown Detroit?

A.

transfer that Meridian Management services would also be

needed for other governmental type things because, because

of the gray areas, because of the potential for getting

tickets and other types of --

Sam Riddle though discussed with you, did he not, that

After a vote would be taken if they were to get a

10

Q.

Issues such as liquor licenses, police involvement,

11

zoning issues, correct?

12

A.

Yes.

13

Q.

And you are familiar in your term of government with

14

the City Council that those type of issues come up with any

15

type of bar establishment, let alone a cabaret or topless

16

entertainment facility, correct?

17

A.

Yes.

18

Q.

And you, because of your role in the financial sector,

19

you had little interest in getting involved in that type of

20

what apparently you believe are somewhat tawdry sectors of

21

business?

22

A.

23

I don't look at that business as tawdry or anything.

24

just not an area that I focused on.

25

Q.

Well, as a correction, I never pass any disparaging --

Okay.

It was

I focused on financing.

But Mr. Riddle explained to you that this was an

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

142

area that he could work in and would feel comfortable in

working, correct?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And before you went to Andiamo's, before the meeting at

Andiamo's did you explain to Mr. St. John and Mr. Hall that

Mr. Riddle could be a valuable consultant in these so-called

gray areas with government as far as a strip club in

downtown Detroit?

A.

I don't recall having that conversation with them.

10

Q.

You may have had that discussion with them, correct?

11

A.

My conversation focused more on the transfer of the

12

license, securing the support and the vote to transfer the

13

license.

14

Q.

So that's what you told St. John and Hall, correct?

15

A.

That was the focus, yes.

16

Q.

Okay.

17

Dearborn, correct?

18

A.

Yes.

19

Q.

And then when it came to money, that is, for them to

20

pay Mr. Riddle, they balked at that, they wouldn't do that?

21

A.

That's correct.

22

Q.

In the same manner that they didn't want to pay you any

23

money, correct?

24

A.

No, they did not balk at it in the same manner, no.

25

Q.

But they didn't want to pay you any money up front

Knowing that, they came to this meeting in

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

either, did they?

2
3

THE COURT:

I think those are argumentative

questions.

4
5

143

MR. WISHNOW:

Thank you, Your Honor.

I'll move

on.

THE COURT:

MR. WISHNOW:

BY MR. WISHNOW:

Q.

They have to be reformulated.


Thank you.

They did not want to pay you up front money either, did

10

they?

11

A.

12

did not reach an agreement on any of this.

13

Q.

14

initial contract proposal to them for you, for

15

Jackson Consulting?

16

A.

I believe there was a retainer made, yes.

17

Q.

Ultimately you said that when the vote came up for

18

reconsideration there was community opposition, correct?

19

After November 17?

20

A.

After the reconsideration?

21

Q.

Yeah.

22

A.

Yes.

23

Q.

When the vote came up again after the letter for

24

reconsideration was submitted that there was community

25

opposition?

I don't recall them saying actually they did not.

We

Well, you had asked for up-front money as part of your

The vote came up for --

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

144

A.

Yes.

Q.

And Monica Conyers, you believe, tabled that vote?

A.

I'm not sure if it was her or one of her colleagues.

Q.

But you were at that meeting?

A.

The vote was tabled.

Q.

You were at that meeting?

A.

Yes.

there.

Q.

I was in and out of the room, but yes, I was

Okay.

And you did not see Monica Conyers vocally favor

10

a vote in favor of Deja Vu, did you?

11

A.

No.

12

Q.

And she took no strong position in favor of Deja Vu,

13

did she?

14

A.

No.

15

Q.

And that action on her part would have been detrimental

16

to her financial situation if she was going to get part of

17

the $15,000; isn't that correct?

They didn't vote.

18

THE COURT:

That question is argumentative.

19

THE WITNESS:

I don't know.

20

MR. WISHNOW:

I can ask the opinion of this

21

witness, Your Honor.

22

THE COURT:

23

MR. WISHNOW:

24

If I could have one moment.

25

THE COURT:

I said the question is argumentative.


Thank you, Your Honor.

You may.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

145

BY MR. WISHNOW:

Q.

councilman and a council president, were you a full-time

employee?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And did that cover -- did you have fringe benefits on

that job?

Sir, when you worked with Gil Hill, who was a

MR. GARDEY:

THE COURT:

10

Objection, Your Honor, relevance.


What is the arguable relevance of what

his remuneration was in the 1990's when he was working?

11

MR. WISHNOW:

Because he gave an opinion earlier

12

as to what he thought was a conflict of interest of someone

13

working for the City government.

14
15

THE COURT:

No, no, no, no.

MR. WISHNOW:

17

THE COURT:

Your Honor, we have evidence that --

I said I have sustained the objection,

but he can answer.

19

MR. WISHNOW:

20

THE COURT:

21

I'm sustaining the

objection.

16

18

We have evidence in --

Thank you.

Did you get fringe benefits when you

worked for Hill?

22

THE WITNESS:

I had different arrangements over

23

the course of the seven years, so it depends on what period

24

of time.

25

THE COURT:

Okay.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Christopher Jackson - Cross


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

146

BY MR. WISHNOW:

Q.

normal work year?

A.

You said 2,000 hours --

Q.

Hours.

A.

-- a week?

Q.

No.

normal work year, about 2,000 hours if you had two weeks off

or thereabouts?

10

A.

Did you work for close to 2,000 hours a week like a

Did you have an arrangement where you worked a

Yes.

11

MR. WISHNOW:

Okay.

Thank you.

12

MR. GARDEY:

13

THE COURT:

14

Do you want to start with another witness or wait

No further questions, Your Honor.


The witness is excused.

15

until Friday morning?

16

MR. GARDEY:

17

short testimony about Deja Vu.

18

THE COURT:

19

THE WITNESS:

20

THE COURT:

21

Go ahead.

22

MR. GARDEY:

23
24

We have Agent Lubisco just to have

Would you wait in back a few minutes.


Yes.

Thank you.

The United States calls Special Agent

Mike Lubisco.
-

25

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Michael Lubisco - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

147

DIRECT EXAMINATION

BY MR. GARDEY:

Q.

you gather bank records concerning the Deja Vu scheme?

A.

Yes, I did.

Q.

Did those bank records include the records for Meridian

Management, an account at Comerica controlled by Sam Riddle?

A.

Yes, they did.

Q.

Agent Lubisco, I'm handing you what's been marked and

Agent Lubisco, in the course of the investigation did

10

entered into evidence as Government's Exhibit 22C and 22E.

11

Would you please identify those.

12

A.

13

on 11-16-06, and it is for $10,000.

14

Q.

What's the date on 22C of the deposit?

15

A.

2C is -- it's 11-17-06.

16

Q.

And what was 22E?

17

A.

22E is also a deposit into the Meridian Management

18

account.

19

amount of $15,000.

20

Q.

21

slip?

22

A.

23

Meridian Management.

24

Q.

25

Government's Exhibit 22A.

First 22C.

22C is a deposit into the Meridian Management account

It's on November 27th, 2006, and it is for the

And is the name of Sam L. Riddle also on the deposit

Yes, it is.

Samuel L. Riddle, Jr.,

Agent Lubisco, I am handing you what's been marked


Would you please state for the

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Michael Lubisco - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

148

record what that is.

A.

Meridian Management Systems.

November 30, 2006.

Q.

please, and under the deposits.

A.

November 17th for $10,000, one on November 27th for $15,000.

Q.

It's a copy of a statement from Comerica Bank for


It's for November 1st, 2006 to

Would you turn to the second page of Exhibit 22A,

The bank account shows two deposits, one on

And were there also earlier deposits for $10,000 on

10

November 8 and 400 on November 1st?

11

A.

Yes, there is.

12

Q.

Was there anything else reflected on this statement

13

concerning the November 27 $15,000 deposit?

14

A.

15

$15,000 was taken out of the account.

16

Q.

17

back on this account?

18

A.

Because there was a stop payment placed on the check.

19

Q.

Are there any cash withdrawals reflected on

20

Mr. Riddle's bank statement for November of 2006?

21

A.

22

November 9th for $4,000; the second on November 20th for

23

2500; and then on November 27 also for 2500.

That on Page 3 is a returned item chargeback, meaning

Any understanding as to why 15,000 would be charged

There are three withdrawals:

The first one on

24

MR. GARDEY:

Just one moment, Your Honor.

25

No further questions, Your Honor.

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

Michael Lubisco - Direct


Wednesday/January 27, 2010/Volume 3

THE COURT:

MR. WISHNOW:

149

Cross.
Oh, I'm sorry.

No questions,

Your Honor.

THE COURT:

MR. GARDEY:

Thank you.

The witness is excused.

Your Honor, our next witness was

going to be Agent Lubisco concerning a different scheme,

and --

8
9

THE COURT:

I think we should start Friday

morning.

10

MR. GARDEY:

11

THE COURT:

Thank you.
Between now and then keep your eyes

12

open, your ears closed, your mouths shut.

Don't talk to

13

anyone about it, don't let anyone talk to you about it.

14

I'll see you Friday morning at 9:00.

Also, don't Google.

15

Everyone will sit down, please, back there.

16

Just leave your stuff on your chair.

17
18
19
20
21

You don't

have to haul it in and out.


(Jury out at 12:40 p.m.)
THE COURT:

You can sit down.

We'll just wait

until the jury clears the floor.


We'll meet tomorrow morning at 10:00, and it would

22

be helpful if you had a draft in the jury instructions, I

23

don't care where you are in your negotiations, but a draft

24

and the verdict form.

25

Ms. Altman has a memo, a copy, on 5401 if you want

09-20025-04; U.S.A. v. Samuel Riddle

You might also like