M8 eR OOM a * 2006 48 12 SED SASL MAMA RSH MA UHM AMELATAL, dK 100088) eR SUGAR, TE SUE LAY TU Ah LS MT EA EF A HL A AURIS. TERS SRT FRET MC EP LR TAAL, RE CN AAV BUDALEE MME MICHA FH AL AHORA TTP, HEBER Pi nA TR XM ALAA, RIN, SR DE CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR GEOMATERIALS WITHIN CLASSIC ELASTOPLASTIC THEORY ZHOU Annan YAO Yangping (Civil Engineering Department of Beihang University, Bejing 100083, China) Abstract Original Cam-clay model, modified Cam-elay model and a new unified eonstitati clay and sand ave widely us in both research and engincering applicatio worlel for both Within the classic clastoplastie Uveory, Uiuse constitutive models for yeomaterials are deduced aftesh in Uhis paper. Comparisons between tase constitutive models within the classic elastoplastic theory and the practical geotechnical engineering are made. ‘The relationships between the corresponding variables and parameters are obtained. Key words geomaterials, constitutive model, classic elastoplastic theory ACPAIBRE, Roscoe AF (!) =F 1063 44 tty dF HH (original cam-clay model) ¢L4tE TEETH AOR RIE REO SAL, RELY JP BM Z—. 1968 4F, Roscoe 1 Burland?! Le — 35 3 JET SURF, HHH T 18 ESI FELD (modified cam- clay model) , RA 44 iA AVE 2 + A HUM. 2002 48, ACF HIE ALAA, Bee) SBE AN RE EU 1 — (unified hardening model) , -APAETE OLTHREAHE SB Ok HLS, SOURCE BRA A — LA ASPB, He, HPS Late AMPA RR, HRA O HER A ALON ODEO, TR EDA A HE me. HESILAT AYER AC HL — 2 HE RAR we A a AE 2008 0-26 GABE 1-H, 2006-05-06 eH AE SEBY AAA: Sp EB Ae HE FN, HARE TL cee ep 20, HEFL OL AH RL AR ea es PARLE, MBAR RS MTT APL. FADE — Fy aT AEE et EB a 2), BORAT ELAN, AW Te He IAT ARE Re ACH EB RICA. 1 Bake TEBE AEST TERE TEE, SARI TT OR a SE Ab ALE A 3 (48) dey = def, + defy a EME OTE A hag, 34 de§s = qo ~ Fdombs @)6H JO, @=E/21+»), om =1/30u) MER HL Drucker 2) BL 36 HI EIR BENE wu. ote act, = age @) JeR, FAURE PE. PHL af fay >0 BY AAD 0,0 SE AE ARE A ANT my. HILLS aA — hed, HH, hm EL Rea eee ore! deh, =n dary, “ A 4) HATS aot nL ap a) OF (OF, oq ap deh = ips ay) TOS, MPRA ae A deg = eh = vas yactae, LE, ef, = 6; % Kronecker #5, FH9REA oul P38 BEA a = V8/2sissy. HAR, iy = 015 — 1/Soundy. 2 BRE TED Sik PA SL FET SUSUR, Roscoe LETC ARTA PY PS 4 Minp—Minp, =o (6) Ste, MA deg = 0 REMY EAA PM RG Hii). pe AIR A p HABE RR, So FAA Bias. Bl SOMMER TERT HR SUPRA RI Se HE FA bute Me 4 BVT, hy ¢ Fah i ating C= ant) Cm 0 @ ASE «SHE ERE BR TTR 36 FRB, MAEM Ty = oF5;, An HAN = V3s85, C BRA ATR AE tO FA A HR A EP ® f SBE a rin (Zh) — (in ies Sh) = 0 (8) SE, Tuy RAE AR ATF 1 tho = Spo, £TIRRAM cy = FURR, BMA AL ne AR CH 2 i a7 BR ME, Taps nye 12 pourra nuns Hak (7) ASE (5) TA def = WL (Laps sean) WNC RPP EAR, Jains a] (9) Sekt ma (10) Ti pe COTM eK (6) Aa =e (F537) an HK (11) ALASK (9), FEATS (9) RABE AT A =o =o (GD o+ aq) (12) pM Roscoe “$4 cP EIT Fede BU ask (12) TT LAR AL FEA BH, HB BLE HE SM ALAA, BA, West (9) h (as)56 noe Ss HX (13) KAR (4) PTAA APMED AR Pin elie oa R of af = PRT A — 90h Ooi; Dou" aay 3 BIE BIRR TASTE SRL AYE (6 1E 21 8F8M (modified cam-clay model), Roseon AI rland ALFA FARA 8 BR Fe rt Pe=0 (13) me oa itt =0 3 Pe ovee et MEER HERE PME OH, HT AA JR i PE SAURRA fant -c=$4 3 -e-0 16) HEIR A PER ONE A a AR A EH poke tin ~ Ae -exp (G8) =0 a7) HExK (16) FLASE (5) » = ph OF af aes 2 lla May it~ pe) se) + pa as) SEPARA ER DEAT <8 — cy ln(pe/po), TE Pe RUTGERS (15) 2 ? par (9) TERE A (9) AR i AT A Pep! HEH (19) LAK (9), deh = ey ee = a 29 opt g (Oph)! | ae (20) ca 2006 #28 Roscoe #I Burland 548 (5 4 8 HR Til bate BO ALAR A, HLA RAL ek HEN RLS fe, Week (18) Als (20) ATLA A (21) HES (21) ALA (4) ROUT ABBA ROHL ER “FR UB EA OF RM OTR Th R Rue af AS fs Dey Dr det, our (22) 4 BBE D SAT RES APT SBE HEAEAY (wuld lauddeniags ssodel), 9) A FA TT F=p+"-p=0 ae (23) PERRO E ERP, 5 — TR 1 1 AR (4) Cae SANE 8) desk — BW HBL BB, NGA 29 Fe) — Na RT Rt, PAR JEL TE 1 FRA HEH AY on, HE A AT se A w= fara [Mae = [oat (26) = fase fi girapet= [eae FA BRI A AY My6H JOH, BEAU y = aly = V2Jo/f, My HsiketHL MAK. MPMEL MARL A M = My, HED O=1: MEBL, —MM 4M, WA, APT REAL, CAMARA, AA Rte f° BTU RRA AH ARR Bow ([25)=0 en MFG ERR, O=1, 8S r Ps cn 22, Hn =0, » pet ) BL mach =a dit = act =o (28) PRUE, CRA ne = pa /pM , Ssh (28) ATLAS a 2 2g irae (Cpa) 4+ pu] dH =e, ° pM? APPAR A AHO, HFK (5) AE (24) (LA 3 (26) at = 6 dep =n. SE (ays Sha) = he (sim )lG n+ Atos (30) WRAL, (29) ASE (30) AT oo EME pM? on OPM +e PM HK (31) ALAR (4), BUA A BI ME IER Fi BOS OE ey = 9 TEMP +7 jer, o- Me par 5 Bae ED SRS + Tee aR BAL BAAS tt HEA HL Db RA ETE ERE DLL BUR MRE 1, 4 2 RIES A. ASE «SHE ERE BR TTR oT 1 RRMA RR THM SR mH aN # Minp—Minps =m tena Pe . f a * 8 a0inp~ (e+) enw * fetes a mene A=6(do+ 7") aah seman of, 42% Somme ® a Re 8 eons ARE it B ate t TRA Te af of ecm ut, slo 2 ABALONE 4 lo a SEAT ok FA BIRR SR OBR BERNA # Pops t, MR : pesos ® neo mee mite eamekOl Ame sae ee Bae Lut Ti? ih sagena a RS TRADER ER TARRN wR tere * Anant r A aeaety 5 BBR a Bete dp * sneowaem oe = 42% i “ rat meee a 3 TM 1, Os ho " 3 hae a tt op (2) 08 mat Pa ® esl o rae p Bae PM? + 27d de =n 88 OF antenna det =n EL PL dey 2006 #28 1) BALE, HE HE EF ky MAA A BS CHE 70 AR A (2) EBRD SRF, AES EB A 4/8820 (original cam-clay model), (8 IE SHH (modified cam-clay model) AIS —f@ #04 (unified hardening model) Aj HY PMO ARTE SC, ICH ABE ANR Hh. eeu 1 Koscoe KH, Schofield AN, Thurairajah A. Yielding of clay in states wetter chan critical, Geotechnigne, 1963, 15 (3) 211240 2 Rovcos KH, Burland JB. On the generalized stress etsin behavior of Swat” clay Engineering Plasticity, Cambridge University Press, 1968, 585~609 3 Yao YP, Luo T, Sun DA, et al. A simple 3:D constitutive model for both clay and sand. Chinese Journal of Geotech- nical Bngincering, 2002, 24(2): 240~246 EE, Re, SOW. AE PMR. ab AP HUR, 1982, 158~161 (Wang Ren, Xiong Zhuhua, Huang Wen- bin. Foundation of Plasticity. Beijing: Science Pross, 1982 153161 (un Cninese)) 5 Martin JB 2%. 2/09 ARRIBA aks AAMT ACAAUMEA, 1990, 18~48 (Martin JD, Plas- ticity: Fundamentale and General Bi o. Yu Tangy, ot al trans. Beijing? Beijing Institute of Technology Press 1900, 18-48 (in Chinese))