Peer Review #2

I was also absent for this peer review, so I will talk about an outside peer review that I
had with Wrenn. I just emailed my synthesis paper to Wrenn and asked him to take a look at it.
He emailed me back saying that there were some mistakes, but that it was pretty good. I noticed
that he didnt give any specifics as to how to improve or anything. He was very vague with how
he approached his comments, when that is the exact opposite of what you need from a peer
reviewer. Thats when I learned firsthand that being very specific to your reviewee is extremely
critical to their success.