Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PRINCIPLES
CONCEPT OF REMEDIAL LAW
Remedial law is that branch of law which
prescribes the method of enforcing rights or
obtaining redress for their invasion (Bustos v.
Lucero, 81 Phil. 640).
Remedial statute or statutes:
(1) Relating to remedies or modes of
procedure;
(2) Do not take away or create vested rights;
(3) BUT operate in furtherance of rights
already existing. (Riano citing Systems
Factor Corporation v NLRC (2000))
Source
Remedial law is basically contained in the Rules
of Court. Circulars of the Supreme Court
implementing the Rules of Court (e.g. Rules on
Summary Procedure) also contain remedial law.
The Rules of Court, promulgated by authority of
law, have the force and effect of law, if not in
conflict with positive law (Inchausti & Co v de
Leon (1913)]. The rule is subordinate to the
statute, and in case of conflict, the statute will
prevail. [Shioji v Harvey (1922)].
Applicability
The Rules of Court is applicable in ALL COURTS,
EXCEPT as otherwise provided by the SC [Rule 1,
Sec. 2].
It governs the procedure to be observed in CIVIL
or CRIMINAL actions and SPECIAL proceedings
[Rule 1, Sec. 3].
It does not apply to the following cases:
1. Election cases,
2. Land registration cases,
3. Cadastral cases
4. Naturalization cases,
5. Insolvency proceedings
6. Other cases not herein provided for
Except by analogy or in a suppletory
character and whenever practicable and
convenient [Rule 4, Sec. 4]
Prospectivity/ Retroactivity
The Rules of Court are not penal statutes and
cannot be given retroactive effect [Bermejo v
Barrios (1970)].
REMEDIAL LAW
It refers to the
legislation providing
means or methods
whereby causes of
action may be
effectuated, wrongs
redressed, and relief
obtained
It is also called
Adjective Law
It has no vested rights
It governs acts and
transactions which
took place
(retroactive)
The SC is expressly
empowered to
promulgate procedural
rules
JUDGE
An officer of such
tribunal
The judge is the one
who sits in court
A physical and
natural person
A public officer
JURISDICTION
JURISDICTION IN GENERAL
Jurisdiction is defined as the authority to try,
hear and decide a case [Tolentino v. Leviste
(2004)].
Judicial power includes the duty of the courts of
justice: [Art 8, Sec. 1, Constitution]
1. To settle actual controversies involving
rights which are legally demandable and
enforceable;
2. To determine WON there has been a
grave abuse of discretion amounting to
lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part
of
any
government
branch/
instrumentality.
All courts exercise judicial power. Only the
Supreme Court is the court created by the
Constitution [Art 8, Sec. 1, Constitution]. The
Sandiganbayan is a Constitutionally mandated
court, but it is created by statute. [PD 1486]
REQUISITES FOR A VALID EXERCISE OF
JURISDICTION
1. Court must have jurisdiction over the
persons of the parties
2. It must have jurisdiction over the subject
matter of the controversy
3. It must have jurisdiction over the res
4. It must have jurisdiction over the issues
JURISDICTION OVER THE PARTIES
The manner by which the court acquires
jurisdiction over the parties depends on whether
the party is the plaintiff or the defendant.
The mode of acquisition of jurisdiction over the
plaintiff and the defendant applies both to
ordinary and special civil actions.
How jurisdiction over the PLAINTIFF is acquired Jurisdiction over the plaintiff is acquired by filing
of the complaint or petition. By doing so, he
submits himself to the jurisdiction of the court
[Davao Light & Power Co., Inc. v CA (1991)].
to
of
to
as
Error of jurisdiction
Correctible by appeal
[Cabrera v Lapid
(2006)]
Renders a judgment
void or voidable [Rule
16 Sec. 1, Rule 65]
as
doctrine
of
continuity
of
JURISDICTION OF THE
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURTS AND
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS
JURISDICTION OF THE MTCs IN CIVIL CASES
Exclusive Original Jurisdiction
1. If the amount involved does not exceed
P300,000 outside Metro Manila or does
not exceed P400,000 in Metro Manila in
the following cases:
a. Actions involving personal property
b. Probate Proceeding (testate and
intestate) based on gross value of the
estate
c. Admiralty and maritime cases
d. Demand for money
NOTE: Do not include Interest,
Damages of whatever kind, Attorneys
fees, Litigation Expenses, and Costs
(IDALEC). However, in cases where
the claim for damages is the main
cause of action, or one of the causes
of action, the amount of such claim
shall be considered in determining the
jurisdiction of the court.
2. Actions involving title to, or possession of,
real property, or any interest therein
where the assessed value of the property
or interest therein does not exceed
P20,000 outside Metro Manila or does not
exceed P50,000 in Metro Manila
3. Inclusion and exclusion of voters
4. Those governed by the Rules on
Summary Procedure
a. Forcible entry and unlawful detainer
(FEUD)
(1) With jurisdiction to resolve issue of
ownership to determine ONLY
issue of possession (provisional
only)
(2) Irrespective of the amount of
damages or unpaid rentals sought
to be recover
(3) Where
attorneys
fees
are
awarded, the same shall not
exceed P20,000
b. Other civil cases, except probate
proceeding, where the total amount of
the plaintiffs claim does not exceed
P200,000 in MM, exclusive of interests
and costs.
Special Jurisdiction over petition for writ of
habeas corpus OR application for bail in criminal
cases in the absence of all RTC judges in the
province or city
Delegated Jurisdiction to hear and decide
cadastral and land registration cases where:
in
one
municipality
of
JURISDICTION OF THE
SANDIGANBAYAN
Original Jurisdiction in all cases involving:
1. Violations of RA 3019 (Anti-Graft and
Corrupt Practices Act)
2. Violations of RA 1379 (Anti-Ill-Gotten
Wealth Act)
3. Sequestration cases (E.O. Nos. 1,2,14,14A)
4. Bribery (Chapter II, Sec. 2, Title VII, Book
II, RPC) where one or more of the
principal accused are occupying the
following positions in the government,
whether in permanent, acting or interim
capacity at the time of the commission of
the offense:
a. Officials of the executive branch
occupying the positions of regional
director
and
higher,
otherwise
classified as Grade 27 and higher, of
the
Compensation
and
Position
Classification Act of 1989 (RA 6758)
b. Members of Congress and officials
thereof classified as G-27 and up
under RA 6758
c. Members of the Judiciary without
prejudice to the provisions of the
Constitution
d. Chairmen and Members of the
Constitutional Commissions without
prejudice to the provisions of the
Constitution
e. All other national and local officials
classified as Grade 27 and higher
under RA 6758
f. Other offenses or felonies committed
by the public officials and employees
mentioned in Sec. 4(a) of RA 7975 as
TOTALITY RULE
COMMENCEMENT
OF ACTIONS TO
TRIAL
ACTIONS
ACTIONS IN GENERAL: An ordinary suit in a
court of justice by which one party prosecutes
another for the enforcement/ protection of a
right or the prevention/redress of a wrong
[Santos v. Vda. De Caparas, (1959)]
An action is a formal demand of ones legal
rights in a court of justice in the manner
prescribed by the court or by the law.
Determinative fact which converts a claim into
an action or suit is the filing of the same with a
court of justice. (Herrera)
Action v. Cause of Action
CAUSE OF ACTION
A cause of action is the
basis of the action filed
[Rule 2, Sec.1]
Fact or combination of
facts which affords a
party a right to judicial
interference in his
behalf. [Into v. Valle
(2005)]
ACTION
Ordinary suit in a court
of justice, by which one
party prosecutes
another for the
enforcement or
protection of a right, or
the prosecution or
redress of a wrong
Kinds of Action
1. Civil or Criminal
a. Civil one by which a party sues
another for the enforcement or
protection of a right, or the prevention
or redress of a wrong
b. Criminal one by which the State
prosecutes a person for an act or
omission punishable by law
2. Ordinary or Special both are governed
by the rules of ordinary civil actions,
Special Proceeding
As to Parties
Involves 2 or more
Involves at least 1
parties
party or 2 or more
parties in proper
cases
As to cause of action
Involves a right and a
May involve a right,
violation of such right
but there need not
by the defendant
be a violation of this
which causes some
right
damage/prejudice
upon the plaintiff
As to formalities
Requires the
Requires no such
application of legal
formalities, as it
remedies in
may be granted
accordance with the
upon application
prescribed rules
As to governing rules
Ordinary rules of
Special rules of
procedure
procedure
As to appeal from an interlocutory
Order
Cannot be directly and
immediately appealed
Can be immediately
to the appellate court
and directly
until after final
appealed to the
judgment on the
appellate court
merits
PERSONAL ACTIONS AND REAL ACTIONS
Real Actions: Actions affecting title to or
possession of real property, or interest therein.
[Rule 4, Sec. 1 par 1]
Personal Actions: All other actions are personal
actions. [Rule 4, Sec.2]
Importance of Distinction: For purposes of
determining venue of the action (Riano)
1. Real actions shall be commenced and
tried in the proper court which has
jurisdiction over the area wherein the real
property involved, or a portion thereof, is
situated. [Rule 4, Sec.1]
2. Personal actions may be commenced and
tried where the plaintiff or any of the
principal plaintiffs resides, or where the
defendant or any of the principal
defendants resides, or in the case of a
non-resident defendant, where he may be
found, at the election of the plaintiff.
[Rule 4, Sec.2]
NOTE: Not every action involving a real
property is a real action because the realty
may only be incidental to the subject matter
of the suit. To be a real action, it is not
enough that the action must deal with real
property. It is important that the matter in
litigation must also involve any of the
following
issues:
title
to,
ownership,
possession,
paritition,
foreclosure
or
mortgage or any interest in real property.
(Riano)
Real action
Ownership or
possession of
real property
is involved
Founded on
privity of real
estate
Filed in the
court where
the property
(or any
portion
thereof) is
situated
Personal
action
Personal
property is
sought to be
recovered or
damages for
breach of
Contract or
the
enforcement
of a contract
are sought
Founded on
privity of
contract
Filed in the
court where
the plaintiff or
any of the
defendants
resides, at the
plaintiffs
option
Mixed action
Founded on
both
The rules on
venue of real
actions
govern
Transitory action
One that could be
prosecuted in any one
of several places
[Manila Railroad v.
Attorney-General
(1911)]
Its venue depends
upon the residence of
the plaintiff or the
defendant at the
option of the plaintiff
(Riano)
IN
PERSONAM,
ACTION IN
REM
ACTION IN
PERSONAM
Directed
against the
Directed
against
AND
ACTION
QUASI IN
REM
Directed
against
thing itself
particular
persons
Jurisdiction
over the
person of the
defendant not
required
Jurisdiction over
the person of
defendant
required
Proceeding to
determine the
state or
condition of a
thing
Judgment is
binding on the
whole world
E.g. Probate
proceeding,
Action to
impose a
responsibility or
liability upon a
person directly
Judgment is
binging only
upon impleaded
parties or their
successors in
interest
E.g. Specific
performance,
particular
persons
Jurisdiction
over the
person of
defendant is
not required
as long as
jurisdiction
over the res
is required
Proceeding
to subject
the interest
of a named
defendant
over a
particular
property to
an
obligation or
lien
burdening it
Judgment
binging
upon
particular
persons
E.g. Action
for partition;
CAUSE OF ACTION
CAUSE OF ACTION: A cause of action is the act
or omission by which a party violates a right of
another. [Rule 2, Sec.2]
Every ordinary civil action must be based on a
cause of action [Rule 2, Sec. 1]
A cause of action stems from the sources of
obligations under Art. 1156, CC - Law, Contract,
Quasi-contract, Acts and omissions punishable
by law and Quasi-delict. [Sagrada Orden etc v.
National Coconut Corporation (1952)]
Elements of a Cause of Action:
1. Plaintiffs legal right;
2. Defendants correlative obligation to
respect plaintiffs right;
3. Defendants act/omission in violation of
plaintiffs right [Ma-ao Sugar Central v.
Barrios (1947)]
RIGHT OF ACTION vs. CAUSE OF ACTION
(Regalado)
Right of action
Cause of action
cadastral
proceeding
action for
breach of
contract
foreclosure
of real
estate
mortgage
order that
dismissed.
the
complaint
may
be
JOINDER OF CAUSES
Contemplates several
causes of action
Encouraged
It
minimizes
multiplicity of suits
and inconvenience on
the parties
Lack of legal
personality to sue
It can be used as
ground for a MTD
based on the failure of
complaint to state a
cause of action. [Rule
16 (1) (g)]
3. One
necessary
to
a
complete
determination or settlement of the
questions involved therein
REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST
Who is a real party-in-interest: (Rule 3, Sec. 2)
1. The
party
who
stands
to
be
benefited/injured by the judgment in the
suit;
2. The party entitled to the avails of the suit.
Rules:
1. Every action must be prosecuted or
defended in the name of the real party in
interest. [Rule 3, Sec.2]
2. The partys interest must be direct,
substantial and material [Sumalo v. Litton
(2006)].
3. Husband and wife shall sue and be sued
jointly, except as provided by law [Rule 3,
Sec. 4]
4. A minor or a person alleged to be
incompetent may sue or be sued, with
the assistance of his father, mother,
guardian, or if he has none, a guardian ad
litem. [Rule 3, Sec. 5]
5. Minors (represented by their parents) are
real parties in interest under the principle
of intergenerational responsibility. [Oposa
v. Factoran (1993)]
6. If
a
party
becomes
incompetent/
incapacitated during the pendency of the
action, the action survives and may be
continued by/against the incompetent/
incapacitated assisted by his legal
guardian or guardian ad litem [Rule 3,
Sec. 18]
Failure to Name Real Party in Interest
a. Effect: a motion to dismiss may be filed
on the ground that the complaint states
no cause of action
(a) If a complaint is filed for and in behalf
of a plaintiff who is not authorized to
do so, the complaint is not deemed
filed
b. Remedies:
(1) Amendment of pleadings (Alonso v.
Villamor, 1910); or
(2) Complaint may be deemed amended
to include the real party-in-interest
(Balquidra v. CFI Capiz, 1977)
c. Exception: A real litigant may be held
bound as a party even if not formally
impleaded provided he had his day in
court (Albert v. University Publishing Co.,
1958)
INDISPENSABLE PARTIES
Who: An indispensable party is a real party-ininterest without whom no final determination can
be had of an action. [Rule 3, Sec.7]
Necessary parties
[Rule 3, Sec. 8]
Should be joined
whenever possible; the
action can proceed
even in their absence
because their interest
is separable from that
of the indispensable
party
The case may be
determined in court
but the judgment
therein will not resolve
the entire controversy
if a necessary party is
not joined
They are those whose
presence is necessary
to adjudicate the
whole controversy but
whose interests are so
far separable that a
final decree can be
made in their absence
without affecting
them.
INDISPENSABLE
PARTIES
are
ALTERNATIVE DEFENDANTS
Permissive Joinder of
Parties
There are multiple
causes of action
separately belonging
to several persons.
Class Suit
Derivative Suit
An action brought by
minority shareholders
in the name of the
corporation to redress
wrongs committed
against it, for which
the directors refuse to
sue.
It is a remedy
designed by equity
and has been the
principal defense of
the minority
shareholders against
abuses by the
majority.
In a derivative action,
the real party in
interest is the
corporation itself, not
the shareholders who
actually instituted it
[Lim v. Lim Yu (2001))
SUITS
AGAINST
ENTITES
JURIDICAL PERSONALITY
WITHOUT
Requisites:
1. Public officer is a party to an action in his
official capacity;
2. During the pendency of the action, he
either dies/resigns or otherwise ceases to
hold office;
3. It is satisfactorily shown to the court by
any party, within 30 days after the
successor takes office, that there is a
substantial need to continue/maintain the
action and
4. The successor adopts/continues (or
threatens to do so) his predecessors
action
5. The party or officer affected was given
reasonable notice of the application
therefore and accorded an opportunity to
be heard.
Action on Contractual Money Claims [Rule 3, Sec.
20]
Requisites:
1. The action must primarily be for recovery
of money/debt or interest thereon;
2. The claim arose from express/implied
contract;
3. Defendant dies before the entry of final
judgment in the court in which the action
was pending.
4. The defendants death will not result in
the dismissal of the action.
The deceased shall be substituted by his legal
representatives in the manner provided for in
Rule 3, Sec. 16, and the action will continue until
the entry of final judgment.
However, execution shall not issue in favor of the
winning plaintiff. It should be filed as a claim
against the decedents estate without need of
proving the claim.
Transfer of Interest During Pendency of Action
[Rule 3, Sec. 19]
General rule: The rule does not consider the
transferee an indispensable party. Hence, the
action may proceed without the need to implead
him.
VENUE
Venue is the place, or the geographical area
where an action is to be filed and tried. In civil
cases, it relates only to the place of the suit and
not to the jurisdiction of the court. [Riano citing
Manila Railroad Company v. Attorney General
(1911)]
Choosing the venue of an action is not left to a
plaintiffs caprice; the matter is regulated by the
Rules of Court. [Ang v. Sps. Ang (2012)]
VENUE VERSUS JURISDICTION
Venue
Place where the action
is instituted
May be waived
Procedural
May be changed by
the written agreement
of the parties
Establishes a relation
between plaintiff and
defendant, or
petitioner and
respondent
Not a ground for a
motu propio dismissal
(except in cases of
summary procedure;
Rule 4, Rule on
Summary Procedure)
Jurisdiction
Power of the court to
hear and decide a
case
Jurisdiction over the
subject matter and
over the nature of the
action is conferred by
law and cannot-be
waived
Substantive
Is fixed by law and
cannot be the subject
of the agreement of
the parties
Establishes a relation
between the court
and the subject
matter
Lack of jurisdiction
over the subject
matter is a ground for
a motu proprio
dismissal.
AGAINST
NON-
PLEADINGS
May be initiatory
DEFINITION
Pleadings are the written statements of the
respective claims and defenses of the parties,
submitted to the court for appropriate judgment
[Rule 6, Sec. 1]
Pleading v. Motion
PLEADING
Purpose: to submit a
claim or defense for
appropriate judgment
MOTION
Purpose: to apply for
an order not included
in the judgment
Must be written
Cannot be initiatory as
they are always made
in a case already filed
in court
May be filed even after
judgment
Any application for
relief not by a pleading
is a motion
May be oral when
made in open court or
in the course of a
hearing or trial
KINDS OF PLEADINGS
Kinds of Pleadings Allowed (Rule 6, Sec. 2)
1. Complaint
2. Answer
3. Counterclaim
4. Cross-claim
5. 3rd-party Complaint
6. Complaint-in-intervention
7. Reply
COMPLAINT(Rule 6, Sec. 3)
Definition - The pleading alleging the plaintiffs
cause/s of action. It should contain a concise
statement of the ultimate facts constituting the
plaintiffs cause/s of action, not evidentiary facts
or legal conclusions.
Contents Statement of ultimate facts on which
the plaintiff relies for his claim:
1. It must be in a methodical and logical
form
2. Plain, concise, and direct
3. Statement of mere evidentiary facts are
omitted (Rule 8, Sec. 1)
Function
1. Its function is to inform the defendant
clearly and definitely of claims made
against him so that he may be prepared
to meet the issues at trial.
2. It should inform the defendant of all
material facts on which the plaintiff relies
to support his demand.
3. It should state the theory of a cause of
action which forms the bases of plaintiffs
claim of liability. [Tantuico v. Republic
(1991)]
Ultimate Facts - Essential facts constituting the
plaintiffs cause of action. A fact is essential if it
cannot be stricken out without leaving the
statement of the cause of action insufficient.
[Remitere v. Montinola (1966)]
Non-Ultimate Facts:
1. Evidentiary or immaterial facts;
2. Legal
conclusions,
conclusions
or
inferences of facts from facts not stated,
or incorrect inferences or conclusions
from facts stated;
3. Conclusions of law alleged in the
complaint are not binding on the court.
4. The details of probative matter or
particulars of evidence, statements of
law, inferences and arguments.
Test of Sufficiency of the Facts alleged in the
Complaint: WON upon the averment of facts, a
valid judgment may be properly rendered
[Pamintan v. Costales (1914)].
Need not be
answered; no default.
Permissive
counterclaim
It does not arise out
of nor is it necessarily
connected with the
subject matter of the
opposing party's
claim.
Compulsory Counterclaim
1. Requisites:
a. It must arise out of, or be necessarily
connected
with,
the
transaction/occurrence that is the
subject matter of the opposing party's
claim;
b. It does not require for its adjudication
the presence of 3rd parties of whom
the court cannot acquire jurisdiction;
c. It must be within the courts
jurisdiction both as to the amount and
the
nature.
[Regalado,
citing
Quintanilla v CA (1997)]
2. General Rule: A compulsory counterclaim
not set up in the answer is deemed
barred.
a. Exceptions:
(1) If it is a counterclaim which either
matured or was acquired by a
party after serving his answer. In
this case, it may be pleaded by
filing a supplemental answer or
pleading before judgment. [Rule
11, Sec. 9]
(2) When a pleader fails to set up a
counterclaim through oversight,
inadvertence,
excusable
negligence, or when justice so
requires. He may, by leave of
court, set-up the counterclaim by
amendment of the pleading (Rule
11, Sec. 10)
3. A plaintiff who fails or chooses not to
answer a compulsory counterclaim may
not be declared in default, principally
because the issues raised in the
counterclaim are deemed automatically
joined by the allegations in the complaint.
[Gojo v. Goyala (1970)]
4.
5. The filing of a MTD and the setting up of a
compulsory
counterclaim
are
incompatible remedies.
CROSS-CLAIM
Requisites:
1. A claim by one party against a co-party;
Cross-claim
Counterclaim
Against a
Against an
3rd Party
complaint
Against a
co-party
opposing party
person not a
party to the
action
Must arise
out of the
transaction
that is the
subject
matter of
the original
action or of
a
counterclai
m therein
Must be in
respect of
the
opponents
(plaintiffs)
claim
No need for
a leave of
court
No need for
leave of court
Leave of
court is
needed
3rd-party complaint
Complaint in
intervention
Initiative is with a
non-party who seeks
to join the action
3rd-party complaint
Counterclaim
Same
AGAINST
Judgment by default
Rendered by the court
following a default
order or after it
received ex parte
plaintiffs evidence
Final Appealable
If motion granted:
Court issues order of default and renders judgment or require plaintiff to submit evidence ex parte
PERIOD
Within 15 days
Answer to
the
Complaint
Answer to
AMENDED
Complaint
(amended
counterclai
m, crossclaim, 3rd
party
complaint,
complaint
in
interventio
n)
Answer to
Counterclai
m or CrossClaim
Answer to
third (4th,
etc)- party
complaint
Within 30 days if
the defendant is a
foreign private
juridical entity
and service of
summons is made
on government
official
At least 60 days
In case of nonresident
defendant on
whom
extrajudicial
service is made
Within 15 days
(if amendment
was a matter of
right)
PERIOD
COUNTED
FROM
Service of
summons,
unless a
different
period is fixed
by the court
(Rule 11, Sec.
1
Receipt of
summons
(Rule 11, Sec.
2)
Service of
extrajudicial
summons
(Sec. 15, Rule
14)
Service of a
copy of the
amended
complaint
Within 10 days
(if amendment
was not a matter
of right)
Notice of the
order
admitting the
same (Rule 11,
Sec. 3)
Within 10 days
From service
(Rule 11, Sec.
4)
Within 15 days
Reply
Within 10 days
Answer to
supplemen
tal
complaint
Within 10 days
Same rule as
answer to the
complaint
(Rule 11, Sec.
5)
From service
of the
pleading
responded to
(Rule 11, Sec.
6)
From notice of
the order
admitting the
same, unless a
different
period is fixed
by the court
NOTE: Upon motion and on such terms as may
be just, the court may extend the time to plead
provided in these Rules. The court may also,
upon like terms, allow an answer or other
pleading to be filed after the time fixed by these
Rules. [Rule 11, Sec. 11]
MANNER OF FILING
As per Rule 13, Sec. 3:
1. Personally
a. By By personally presenting the
original to the clerk of court.
b. The pleading is deemed filed upon the
receipt of the same by the clerk of
court who shall endorse on it the date
and hour of filing.
c. If a party avails of a private carrier,
the date of the courts actual receipt
of the pleading (not the date of
delivery to the private carrier) is
deemed to be the date of the filing of
that pleading. [Benguet Electric
Cooperative v. NLRC (1992)]
2. By Registered Mail
a. Filing by mail should be through the
registry service (i.e. by depositing the
pleading in the post office).
b. The pleading is deemed filed on the
date it was deposited with the post
office.
Filing a pleading by facsimile is not sanctioned.
But fax was allowed in an extradition case
(Justice Cuevas v. Juan Antonio Munoz)
MODES OF SERVICE
Personal Service (Rule 13, Sec. 6)
1. Delivering personally a copy to the party,
who is not represented by a counsel, or to
his counsel; or
2. Leaving a copy in counsels office with his
clerk or with a person having charge
thereof; or
3. Leaving the copy between 8am and 6pm
at the partys or counsels residence, if
known, with a person of sufficient age
and discretion then residing thereon if
not person is found in his office, or if his
office is unknown, or if he has no office
Service by Mail (Rule 13, Sec. 7)
1. Ordinary Mail - it does not constitute filing
until the papers are actually delivered
into the custody of clerk or judge
a. Service may be done by ordinary mail
if no registry service is available in the
locality of either sender or addressee
Completeness of
Proof of service
service (Rule 13
(Rule 13 Sec. 13)
Sec. 10)
Personal service
Written admission of
the party served, OR
Official return of the
server OR
Upon actual delivery
Affidavit of the party
serving, with a full
statement of the
date/place/manner of
service.
Service by ordinary mail
10 days after
Affidavit of the person
mailing, unless
mailing of facts
otherwise provided
showing compliance
by the court
with Sec. 7 of Rule 13.
Service by registered mail
Affidavit of the person
Whichever is earlier:
mailing of facts
showing compliance
Actual receipt by the
with Sec. 7 of Rule 13
addressee
OR
AND
5 days after the
addressee received
Registry receipt issued
1st
postmaster's
by the post office
notice (Constructive)
Substituted Service
At the time of delivery of the copy to the clerk
of court together with proof of failure of both
personal service and service by mail
Purpose of the rule on completeness of service
for service by registered mail:
To make sure that the party being served with
the pleading, order or judgment is duly informed
of the same so that such party can take steps to
protect the interests, i.e., enable to file an
appeal or apply for other appropriate reliefs
before the decision becomes final. [MINTERBRO
v,CA (2012)]
Service to the lawyer binds the party. But service
to the party does not bind the lawyer, unless
ordered by the court in the following
circumstances:
1. When it is doubtful who the attorney for
such party is; or
2. When the lawyer cannot be located; or
3. When the party is directed to do
something personally, as when he is
ordered to show cause. [Retoni, Jr. v. CA]
Notice to the lawyer who appears to have been
unconscionably
irresponsible
cannot
be
considered as notice to his client, as it would
then be easy for the lawyer to prejudice the
interests of his client by just alleging that he just
forgot every process of the court affecting his
Personal Service
Service by ordinary
mail
Service by registered
mail
PROOF OF SERVICE
A written admission of
the party served, OR
The official return of
the server; OR
Affidavit of the party
serving containing a
full statement of the
date, place, and
manner of service
Affidavit of the person
mailing stating the
facts showing
compliance with Rule
13, Sec. 7
Affidavit of person
mailing containing
facts showing
compliance with Rule
AND
SUPPLEMENTAL
judicial
2. Instances:
a. Substantial amendment before
responsive pleading is filed
(1) Amendment of complaint before
an answer is filed.
(2) Amendment of answer before a
reply is filed or before the period
for filing a reply expires
(3) Amendment of reply any time
within 10 days after it is served
b. Formal amendment
AMENDMENTS BY LEAVE OF COURT (Rule 10,
Sec. 3)
When leave of court is necessary before
amendment is allowed:
1. All substantial amendments (unless it
falls under Rule 10, Sec. 2 as a matter of
right)
2. When a responsive pleading has already
been served
Requisites:
1. A motion for leave of court to amend
pleading is filed
a. Amended pleading should be attached
to the motion (see Sec. 9, Rule 15)
2. Notice is given to the adverse party
3. Parties are given opportunity to be heard
Grounds for allowance of the amendment
1. If it appears to the court that the motion
was made to delay the action, leave of
court is not given
2. There must be some reasonable grounds
justifying its exercise of discretion to
allow amendment
When amendment by leave of court may not be
allowed
1. If the cause of action, defense or theory
of the case is changed.
2. If amendment is intended to confer
jurisdiction to the court.
a. If the court has no jurisdiction in the
subject matter of the case, the
amendment of the complaint cannot
be allowed so as to confer jurisdiction
on the court over the property. [PNB v.
Florendo (1992)]
3. If amendment is for curing a premature or
non-existing cause of action.
4. If amendment is for purposes of delay.
FORMAL AMENDMENTS (Rule 10, Sec. 4)
When an amendment is formal:
1. When there is a mere defect in the
designation of the parties;
2. Other clearly clerical or typographical
errors
SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS
AMENDMENTS TO CONFORM TO OR AUTHORIZE
PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE (Rule 10, Sec. 5)
Applicability of Sec. 5 This is an instance
wherein the court acquires jurisdiction over the
issues even if the same are not alleged in the
original pleadings of the parties where the trial
of said issues is with the express or implied
consent of the parties
What Sec. 5 contemplates:
1. It allows a complaint which states no
cause of action to be cured either by:
a. Evidence presented without objection
or
b. In the event of an objection sustained
by the court, by an amendment of the
complaint with leave of court
2. It also allows the admission of evidence:
a. On a defense not raised in a motion or
answer if no objection is made
thereto;
b. In the event of such objection, court
may allow amendment of the answer
in order to raise said defense
NOTE: Remember, however, that where the
plaintiff has no valid cause of action at the time
of the filing of the complaint, this defect cannot
be cured or remedied by the acquisition or
accrual of one while the action is pending
Two Scenarios:
1. When evidence is NOT objected to
When issues not raised by pleadings
are tried by express or implied
consent of the parties, they shall be
treated in all respected as if they had
been raised in the pleadings
Such amendments of pleadings as
may be necessary to cause them to
conform to the evidence and raise
these issues may be made upon
motion of any party at any time, even
after judgment
But failure to amend does not affect
the result of the trial of those issues
2. When evidence IS objected to:
Objection on the ground that it is not
within the issues made by the
pleadings
Supplemental
pleadings
Either as a matter of
right or a matter of
discretion
Always a matter of
discretion
Supersedes the
original
When an amended
pleading is filed, a
new copy of the entire
pleading must be filed
Merely supplements
the original (i.e. Exists
side by side with the
original pleading)
A supplemental
pleading does not
require the filing of a
new copy of the entire
pleading
Limitations:
1. Claims or defenses which have matured
after the filing of the original pleadings
cannot be averred in a supplemental
pleading (it may be the subject of an
amendment)
2. Supplemental pleadings are not allowed
on separate and distinct causes of action
a. A supplemental pleading may raise a
new cause of action as long as it has
some relation to the original cause of
action set forth in the original
complaint. [Ada v. Baylon (2012)]
SUMMONS
Definition: A coercive force issued by the court
to acquire jurisdiction over the person of the
defendant
NATURE AND PURPOSE OF SUMMONS IN
RELATION TO ACTIONS IN PERSONAM, IN REM,
AND QUASI IN REM
Purposes of Summons
1. For Actions in Personam
a. To acquire jurisdiction over the person
of the defendant in a civil case;
b. To give notice to the defendant that
an action has been commenced
against him.
2. For Actions in Rem and Quasi In Rem
a. Not to acquire jurisdiction over the
defendant but mainly to satisfy the
constitutional requirement of due
process
b. Jurisdiction over the defendant is not
required and the court acquires
jurisdiction over an action as long as it
acquires jurisdiction over the res
Issuance of Summons - Upon the filing of the
complaint and the payment of legal fees, the
clerk of court shall issue the corresponding
summons to the defendants. [Rule 14, Sec. 1]
Contents of Summons (Rule 14, Sec. 2)
1. Summons shall be:
a. Directed to the defendant
b. Signed by clerk of court under seal
2. Summons shall contain:
a. Name of the court and the names of
the parties to the action
b. A direction that the defendant answer
within the time fixed by the Rules
c. A notice that unless the defendant so
answers, plaintiff will take judgment
by default and may be granted the
relief applied for
3. The following shall be attached to the
original and each copy of the summons:
a. A copy of the complaint
b. Order for appointment of guardian ad
litem (if any)
Effect of Invalid Summons
Personal Service of
Summons on
Defendant
Rule 14, Sec. 6
Service is only made
on defendant himself
Minors and
incompetent
s (Sec. 10)
Domestic
private
juridical
entity (Sec.
11)
Foreign
private
juridical
entity (Sec.
12)
SERVICE OF SUMMONS
Upon any or all the defendants
being sued under common
name; or person in charge of
the office
In case of minors: by serving
upon:
1. The minor, regardless of
age, AND
2. Upon his legal guardian,
or also upon either of his
parents
In case of incompetents: by
serving on:
1. Him personally AND
2. Upon his legal guardian,
but not upon his parents,
unless they are his legal
guardians
In any event: if the minor or
incompetent
has
no
legal
guardian, the plaintiff must
obtain the appointment of a
guardian ad litem for him
Serve to either: (Exclusive
enumeration)
1. The president,
2. Managing partner,
3. General manager,
4. Corporate secretary,
5. Treasurer, or
6. In- house counsel
Service may be done on:
1. The resident agent;
2. If no resident agent;
a. The
government
official designated by
law; or
b. Any officer or agent
of the corporation
within the Philippines
MOTIONS
Public
corporations
(Sec. 13)
PROOF OF SERVICE
The proof of service of summons (Rule 14, Sec.
18):
1. Shall be made in writing
2. It shall:
a. Set forth the manner, place, date of
service
b. Specify any papers which may have
been served with the process and the
name of the person who received the
same
c. Shall be sworn to when made by a
person, other than the sheriff or his
deputy
If service has been made by publication, service
may be proved by: (Rule 14, Sec. 19)
1. The affidavit of the printer, his foreman,
or principal clerk; or of the editor,
business or advertising manager
Copy of the publication shall be
attached
2. AND an affidavit showing:
a. The deposit of a copy of the
summons; and
b. Order of publication in the post office,
postage
prepaid,
directed
to
defendant by registered mail to his
last known address
Effect of Defect of Proof of Service:
1. Where sheriffs return is defective,
presumption
of
regularity
in
the
performance of official functions will not
lie
2. Defective return is insufficient and
incompetent to prove that summons was
indeed served
3. Party alleging valid summons will now
prove that summons was indeed served
4. If there is no valid summons, court did
not acquire jurisdiction which renders null
and void all subsequent proceedings and
issuances
A motion is an application for relief other than by
a pleading. (1a)
MOTIONS IN GENERAL
DEFINITION OF A MOTION
Motion
Pleading
Contains allegations
of facts
Prays for a relief
Grant of the relief
does not extinguish
the action
(interlocutory relief)
Generally in writing
(with some
exceptions)
Contains allegations
of the ultimate facts
Prays for a relief
Grant of relief
extinguishes the
action (final relief)
Always in writing
the
motion
set
by
the
Bill of Particulars
Purpose is to enable a
party bound to
respond to a pleading
to get more details
about matters which
are alleged generally
or which are indefinite
and vague,
so as to properly
guide such party in
answering the
pleading and to avoid
surprise in the trial of
the case
Available to the
defendant before he
files his responsive
pleading
Intervention
Purpose is to enable a
person not yet a party
to an action, yet
having a certain right
or interest in such
action, the
opportunity to appear
and be joined
so he could assert or
protect such right or
interest
Available to any
person not yet a party
to the action at any
time after the
commencement of an
action, even during
the proceeding, but
not after the trial has
been concluded
Effect of Motion:
1. If the motion is granted, in whole or in
part,
a. The movant can wait until the bill of
particulars is served on him by
opposing party
b. Then he will have the balance of the
reglementary period within which to
file his responsive pleading
2. If the motion is denied
a. He will still have such balance of the
reglementary period to file his
responsive pleading, counted from
service of the order denying his
motion
IN ANY CASE: The party will have at least
5 days to file his responsive pleading
MOTION TO DISMISS
IN GENERAL
Definition A remedy of the defendant, or the
responding party in general, which attacks the
entire pleading and seeks its dismissal based on:
1. Grounds which are patent on the face of
the complaint;
2. Defenses available to the defendant at
the time of the filing of the complaint
It hypothetically admits the facts stated in the
complaint.
It is not a responsive pleading. It is not a
pleading at all. It is subject to the omnibus
motion rule since it is a motion that attacks a
pleading. Hence, it must raise all objections
available at the time of the filing thereof.
Types of Dismissal of Action:
1. MTD before answer under Rule 16;
2. MTD under Rule 17:
a. Upon notice by plaintiff;
b. Upon motion by plaintiff;
c. Due to fault of plaintiff.
3. Demurrer to evidence after plaintiff has
completed the presentation of his
evidence under Rule 33;
4. Dismissal of an appeal.
Period to File: Within the time for, but before
filing of, the answer to the complaint or pleading
asserting a claim
Exceptions:
a. For special reasons which may be
allowed even after trial has begun, a
motion to dismiss may be filed
b. The court has allowed the filing of a
motion to dismiss where the evidence
that would constitute a ground for
dismissal was discovered during trial
General Rule: A court may NOT motu propio
dismiss a case, unless a motion to that effect is
filed by a party.
Exceptions:
1. Cases where the court may dismiss a
case motu propio; [Rule 9, Sec. 1]
2. Failure to prosecute; [Rule 17, Sec. 3]
3. Sec. 4, Revised Rule on Summary
Procedure.
GROUNDS: Rule 16, Sec. 1
1. Lack of jurisdiction over the defendants
person
2. Lack of jurisdiction over the subject
matter of the claim
3. Improper venue
4. Plaintiffs lack of legal capacity to sue
5. Litis pendentia
6. Res judicata
7. Prescription
8. Failure to state a cause of action
9. Extinguished claim
10. Unenforceable claim under the Statute of
Frauds
11. Non-compliance
with
a
condition
precedent for filing claim
NOTE: Complaints cannot be dismissed on
ground not alleged in a motion to dismiss. The
motion may be based on only one of the grounds
enumerated in Sec. 1, Rule 16
Lack of Jurisdiction (LOJ) over the Defendants
Person
The objection of LOJ over the person on account
of lack of service or defective service of
summons, must be raised:
1. At the very first opportunity;
2. Before any voluntary appearance is
made.
In La Naval Drug Corp. v. CA, et al. the Court
held that while lack of jurisdiction over the
person of defendant may be duly and
seasonably raised, his voluntary appearance in
court without qualification is a waiver of such
defense.
Appearance of counsel is equivalent to
summons, unless such is made to protest the
jurisdiction of the court over the person of the
defendant. If grounds other than invalid service
of summons are raised, it cannot be considered
as a special appearance. [De los Santos v.
Montesa (1993)]
NOTE: Sec. 20, Rule 14 makes a categorical
statement that the inclusion in a motion to
dismiss of other grounds aside from lack of
jurisdiction over the person of the defendant
shall not be deemed voluntary appearance on
his part.
Laches
No cause of action
Insufficiency of factual
basis for the action
Extinguished Claim
That the claim/demand set forth in the plaintiff's
pleading has been paid, waived, abandoned or
otherwise extinguished.
Unenforceable Claim under the Statute of Frauds
Article 1403 (2) CC requires certain contracts to
be evidenced by some note or memorandum in
order to be enforceable, to wit:
1. An agreement that by its terms is not to
be performed within a year from the
making thereof;
2. A special promise to answer for the debt,
default, or miscarriage of another;
3. An agreement made in consideration of
marriage, other than a mutual promise to
marry;
4. An agreement for the sale of goods,
chattels or things in action, at a price not
less than five hundred pesos, unless the
buyer accept and receive part of such
goods and chattels, or the evidences, or
some of them, of such things in action, or
pay at the time some part of the
purchase money; but when a sale is
made by auction and entry is made by
the auctioneer in his sales book, at the
time of the sale, of the amount and kind
of property sold, terms of sale, price,
names of the purchasers and person on
whose account the sale is made, it is a
sufficient memorandum;
5. An agreement for the leasing for a longer
period than one year, or for the sale of
real property or of an interest therein;
RESOLUTION OF MOTION
During the hearing of the motion: Parties shall
submit:
1. Their arguments on questions of law
2. Their evidence on questions of fact (Rule
16, Sec. 2)
a. Exception: Those not available at that
time
Parties should be allowed to present
evidence and the evidence should be taken
down
EXCEPT: when the motion is based on the
ground of insufficiency of cause of action
which must generally be determined on the
basis of the facts alleged in the complaint
Trial: If the case goes to trial, such evidence
presented shall automatically be part of the
evidence of the party presenting the same.
Lack of formal hearing of a motion to dismiss is
not fatal where the issues raised were fully
discussed in the
(Castillo v. CA)
motion
and
opposition.
OF
COMPLAINT
ON
WHEN GROUNDS
DEFENSES
PLEADED
AS
AFFIRMATIVE
Remedies of Defendant:
MOTION TO DISMISS
Grounded on
preliminary objections
May be filed by any
defending party
against whom a claim
DEMURRER TO
EVIDENCE
Based on insufficiency
of evidence
May be filed only by
the defendant against
the complaint of the
is asserted in the
action
Should be filed within
the time for but prior
to the filing of the
answer of the
defending party to the
pleading asserting the
claim against him
If denied, defendant
must file an answer,
or else he may be
declared in default
If granted, plaintiff
may appeal or if
subsequent case is
not barred, he may refile the case
DISMISSAL OF ACTIONS
DISMISSAL UPON NOTICE BY PLAINTIFF;
TWO-DISMISSAL RULE (Rule 17, Sec. 1)
Dismissal by plaintiff as a matter of right
Dismissal is effected not by motion but by mere
notice of dismissal which is a matter of right
before the service of:
1. The answer; or
2. A motion for summary judgment
The dismissal as a matter of right ceases when
an answer or a motion for summary judgment is
served on the plaintiff and not when the answer
or the motion is filed with the court.
Dismissal NOT Automatic - It requires an order
by the court confirming the dismissal. Until
confirmed, the withdrawal does not take effect
Generally, Dismissal is Without Prejudice
General Rule: Dismissal is without prejudice
Exceptions:
1. Where the notice of dismissal so provides;
or
2. Where the plaintiff has previously
dismissed the same case in a court of
competent jurisdiction (Two Dismissal
Rule)
3. Even where the notice of dismissal does
not provide that it is with prejudice but it
is premised on the fact of payment by the
defendant of the claim involved (Serrano
v. Cabrera)
Two Dismissal Rule - when the same complaint
had twice been dismissed by the plaintiff without
order of the court by simply filing a notice of
dismissal, the 2nd dismissal operates as an
adjudication on the merits.
plaintiff
May be filed for the
dismissal of the case
only after the plaintiff
has completed the
presentation of his
evidence
If denied, defendant
may present evidence
If granted, plaintiff
appeals and the order
of dismissal is
reversed, defendant
loses his right to
present evidence
SECTION 3
Dismissal is not
procured by plaintiff
though justified by
causes imputable to
him
Dismissal is a matter
of evidence, an
adjudication on the
merits
Dismissal is without
prejudice to the right
of defendant to
prosecute his
counterclaim on the
same or separate
action
PRE-TRIAL
CONCEPT OF PRE-TRIAL
Pre-Trial is a mandatory conference and personal
confrontation before the judge between the
parties and their respective counsel, called by
the court after the joinder of issues in a case or
after the last pleading has been filed and before
trial, for the purpose of settling the litigation
expeditiously or simplifying the issues without
sacrificing the necessary demands of justice.
It is a procedural device by which the court is
called upon, after the filing of the last pleading,
to compel the parties and their lawyers to
appear before it, and negotiate an amicable
settlement or otherwise make a formal
settlement and embody in a single document the
issues of fact and law involved in the action, and
such other matters as may aid in the prompt
disposition in the case, such as:
1. Number of witnesses
2. Tenor or character of their testimonies
3. Documentary evidence; nature and
purpose of each
4. Number of trial dates
Primary Objective
Pre-trial is primarily intended to make certain
that all issues necessary to the disposition of a
case are properly raised.
Thus, to obviate the element of surprise, parties
are expected to disclose at a pre-trial conference
(PTC) all issues of law and fact which they intend
to raise at the trial, except such as may involve
privileged
or
impeaching
matters.
The
determination of issues at a pre-trial conference
bars the consideration of other questions on
appeal. [Caltex v. CA (1992)]
NOTICE OF PRE-TRIAL
When pre-trial conducted - After the last
pleading has been served and filed, it shall be
the
duty of the
plaintiff to promptly
move ex parte that the case be set for pre-trial.
(Sec. 1, Rule 18)
1. Specifically, the motion is to be filed
within 5 days after the last pleading
joining the issues has been served and
filed (Admin Circ. No. 3-99, Jan 15, 1999)
2. Within 5 days from date of filing of the
reply, plaintiff must promptly move exparte that the case be set for pre-trial
conference. If the plaintiff fails to file said
motion within the given period, the
branch clerk shall issue a Notice of PreTrial (AM No. 03-109-SC, July 13, 2004)
NOTE: Note: The Last Pleading need not be
literally construed as the actual filing of the last
pleading. For purpose of pre-trial, the expiration
of the period for filing the last pleading is
sufficient (Sarmiento v. Juan)
Notice of Pre-trial: The notice shall be served on:
1. Counsel
2. Party, only if he has no counsel (Sec. 3,
Rule 18)
The sufficiency of the written notice of pre-trial is
irrelevant where evidence shows that counsel
and the parties actually knew of the pre-trial
(Bembo v. CA)
APPEARANCE OF PARTIES;
FAILURE TO APPEAR
EFFECT
OF
Who fails to
appear
Plaintiff
Defendant
Effect
Cause for dismissal of the action
which will be with prejudice,
unless otherwise ordered by the
court
Cause to allow plaintiff to
present evidence ex parte, and
court to render judgment on the
basis thereof
NOTE: The non-appearance of defendant in pretrial is not a ground to declare him in default.
Thus, we distinguish:
Default by defendant
(Rule 9, Sec. 3)
Upon motion and
notice to defendant.
Requires proof of
failure to answer
Court to render
judgment, unless it
requires submission of
evidence
Judgment by Default
Relief awarded must
be the same in nature
and amount as prayed
for in the complaint
Failure to appear by
defendant (Rule 18,
Sec. 5)
Not required
Not required
Court to allow
plaintiff to present
evidence ex parte,
then the court shall
render judgment
Judgment Ex Parte
Relief awarded may
be of different nature
and amount from the
relief prayed for
Criminal Case
Ordered by the
court and no motion
to set the case for
pre-trial is required
from either the
prosecution or the
defense [Rule 118,
Sec. 1]
Ordered by the
Considered the
possibility of an
amicable
settlement as an
important objective
[Rule 118, Sec.
2(a)]
The arrangements
and admissions in
the pre-trial are not
required to be
signed by both
parties and their
counsels. Under the
Rules, they are
instead to be
contained in the
record of pre-trial
and pre-trial order
[Rule 18, Sec. 7]
[AM No. 03-1-09] requires the
proceedings during
the preliminary
conference to be
recorded in the
Minutes of
Preliminary
Conference to be
signed by both
parties and/or
counsel.
(Note: either party
or his counsel is
allowed to sign)
The sanctions for
non-appearance are
imposed upon the
plaintiff and the
defendant [Rule 18,
Sec. 4]
A pre-trial brief is
specifically required
to be submitted
[Rule 18, Sec. 6]
court after
arraignment and
within 30 days from
the sate the court
acquired jurisdiction
over the person of
the accused [Rule
118, Sec. 1]
Does not include
the considering of
the possibility of
amicable
settlement of ones
criminal liability as
one of its purposes
[Rule 118, Sec. 1]
(Stricter procedure)
All agreements or
admissions made or
entered during the
pre-trial conference
shall be reduced in
writing and signed
by both the accused
and counsel;
otherwise, they
cannot be used
against the
accused. [Rule 118,
Sec. 2]
Sanctions are
imposed upon the
counsel for the
accused or the
prosecutor [Rule
118, Sec. 3]
A pre-trial brief is
not specifically
required.
an
arbritration
that
is
not
international; governed by RA 876
(Arbitration Law) [RA 9285, Sec.
32]
(2) International Arbitration - An
arbitration is international if:
(a) the parties to an arbitration
agreement have, at the time of
the
conclusion
of
that
2. Mediation
a. a voluntary process in which a
mediator, selected by the disputing
parties, facilitates communication and
negotiation, and assist the parties in
reaching a voluntary agreement
regarding a dispute
b. includes conciliation
3. Mini-Trial
a. A
structured
dispute
resolution
method in which the merits of a case
are argued before a panel comprising
senior decision makers with or without
the presence of a neutral third person
after which the parties seek a
negotiated settlement
4. Early Neutral Evaluation
a. An ADR process wherein parties and
their lawyers are brought together
early in a pre-trial phase to present
summaries of their cases and receive
a nonbinding assessment by an
experienced, neutral person, with
expertise in the subject in the
substance of the dispute
5. Combination of ADR
a. Example: Med-Arb - step dispute
resolution process involving both
mediation and arbitration
Special Rules of Court on ADR (AM No. 07-11-08SC)
INTERVENTION
DEFINITION
A legal remedy whereby a person is permitted to
become a party in a case, by either:
1. Joining the plaintiff;
2. Joining the defendant;
3. Asserting his right against both plaintiff
and defendant, considering that either:
a. He has a legal interest in the subject
matter of the action;
b. He has legal interest in the success of
either of the parties
c. He has legal interest against both of
the parties
d. He is going to be adversely affected
by the disposition of the property in
the custody of the court (Rule 19,
Sec. 1)
TIME TO INTERVENE
the
intervention
intervenor
is
is
an
Pleadings-in-Intervention:
1. Complaint-in-intervention If intervenor
asserts a claim against either or all of the
original parties.
2. Answer-in-intervention If intervenor
unites with the defending party in
resisting a claim against the latter.
3. Answer to complaint-in-intervention [Rule
19, Sec. 4] - It must be filed within 15
days from notice of the order admitting
the complaint-in-intervention, unless a
different period is fixed by the court.
REMEDY FOR
INTERVENE
DENIAL
OF
MOTION
TO
1. If intervention is denied
a. Aggrieved party may appeal
b. Mandamus will not lie except in case
of grave abuse of discretion
SUBPOENA
Kinds:
1. Subpoena duces tecum (SDT)
2. Subpoena ad testificandum (SAT)
DEFINITION
Subpoena is a process directed to a person
requiring him:
1. To attend and to testify at the hearing or
the trial of an action, or at any
investigation conducted by competent
authority, or for the taking of his
deposition; or
2. To bring with him any books, documents,
or other things under his control (Rule 21,
Sec. 1)
SUBPOENA
An order to appear
and testify or to
produce books and
documents
May be served to a
non-party
Needs tender of
kilometrage,
attendance fee and
reasonable cost of
production fee
2. If intervention is granted
a. A grant of a motion to intervene is
interlocutory
b. Hence, anyone who objects can file a
petition for certiorari for improper
granting of intervention
SUMMONS
An order to answer
complaint
Served on the
defendant
Does not need tender
of kilometrage and
other fees
SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM
A process directed to a person requiring him to
attend and to testify at the hearing or the trial of
an action, or at any investigation conducted by
competent authority or for the taking of his
deposition
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
A process directed to a person requiring him to
bring with him books, documents, or other things
under his control
The SDT is, in all respects, like the ordinary SAT
with the exception that it concludes with an
injunction that the witness shall bring with him
and produce at the examination the books,
documents, or things described in the subpoena
Before SDT may issue, the court must first be
satisfied that the following requisites are
present:
1. Test
of
RELEVANCY:
The
books,
documents, or other things requested
must appear prima facie relevant to the
issue subject of the controversy
2. Test of DEFINITENESS: Such books must
be reasonably described by the parties to
be readily identified (test of definiteness)
MODES OF DISCOVERY
DISCOVERY a device employed by a party to
obtain information about relevant matters on the
case from the adverse party in the preparation
for trial
Purpose to enable the parties to obtain the
fullest possible knowledge of the issues and
evidence long before the trial to prevent such
trial from being carried on in the dark
Modes:
1. Depositions pending actions Rule 23
2. Depositions before action or pending
appeal Rule 24
3. Interrogatories to parties Rule 25
4. Admission by adverse party Rule 26
5. Production or inspection of documents or
thing Rule 27
6. Physical and mental examination of
persons Rule 28
DEPOSITIONS PENDING ACTION (Rule 23)
Meaning of Deposition - Deposition is chiefly a
mode of discovery, the primary function of which
is to supplement the pleadings for the purpose of
USE
By any party for
contradicting or
impeaching the
testimony of deponent
as witness
A party or anyone
who at the time of the
deposition was an
officer, director, or
managing agent, of a
public or private
corporation or
partnership, or
association which is a
party
By an adverse party
for any purpose
Witness, whether or
not a party
Occurring at
oral
examination
and other
particulars
Objections to
the form of
Effect
Waived
Unless written objection is
promptly served upon party
giving notice
Waived
Unless made:
1. Before
taking
of
deposition begins or
2. As soon thereafter as
disqualification becomes
known or could be
discovered
with
reasonable diligence
Not waived by failure to make
them before or during the
taking of deposition
Unless the ground of the
objection is one which might
have been obviated or removed
if presented at that time
In the manner of taking, in the
form of questions or answers, in
the oath or affirmation, or in
conduct of parties and errors of
any kind which might
be
obviated or removed if promptly
prosecuted are waived
Unless reasonable objection
thereto is made at the time of
taking the deposition
Waived
Unless served in writing upon
written
interrogatorie
s under Sec.
In the
manner in
which
testimony is
transcribed or
in the
preparation
under Sec.
17, 19, 20,
and 26
Manner of Service:
1. Without leave of court After answer
has been served; and for the first set
of interrogatories
2. With leave of court before the
answer has been served; and for
subsequent sets of interrogatories
NOTE: No party may, without leave of
court, serve more than one set of
interrogatories to be answered by the
same party. (Rule 25, Sec. 4)
Answer to Interrogatories: (Rule 25, Sec. 2)
1. Written interrogatories and the answers
thereto must both be filed and served
a. Hence, the answers may constitute as
judicial admissions (Sec. 4, Rule 129)
2. Form of answer:
a. It must be answered fully in writing
b. And signed and sworn to by the
person making them
3. Service and Filing
a. Party upon whom interrogatories were
served shall file and serve a copy of
the answers on the party submitting
interrogatories
b. Time period:
(1) Within 15 days after service
thereof
(2) UNLESS court extends or shortens
the time on motion and for good
cause shown
Objections to Interrogatories: (Rule 25, Sec. 3)
Objections may be presented to the court within
10 days after service thereof with notice as in
case of a motion.
Effect: Answers shall be deferred until objections
are resolved
Grounds:
1. They
require
conclusions of
the
law
statements
or answers
of
to
Interrogatories
Written Interrogatories
The deposition is takes
before a deposition
officer
Questions are prepared
beforehand. These are
submitted to the
deposition officer who
will ask the deponent
the questions and he
will record the answers.
The deposition of any
person may be taken,
whether he is a party or
not.
v.
Interrogatories
Interrogatories
to Parties
There is no
deposition
officer.
The questioning
is direct.
The deposition
of the parties
are only taken.
to
PRODUCTION
OR
INSPECTION
DOCUMENTS OR THINGS (Rule 27)
OF
Consequence of
disobedience, see
Rule 29, Sec. 3
SUBPOENA DUCES
TECUM
A means of compelling
production of evidence
It may be directed to a
person whether a
party or not
It may be issued upon
an ex parte application
May be asked only
during trial
Not necessary to show
good cause
Grounds for quashal:
1. Unreasonable,
oppressive,
irrelevant
2. Failure
to
advance
reasonable
costs
of
production
Disobedience
constitutes contempt
of court
Procedure:
1. A motion must be filed by the party
seeking the production or inspection of
documents and things and the motion
must show good cause supporting the
same. [Rule 27, Sec. 1]
2. The court in which the action is pending
shall issue an order:
a. which shall specify the time, place
and manner of making the inspection
and taking copies and photographs,
and
b. which may prescribe such terms and
conditions as are just. [Rule 27, Sec.
1]
Court Order:
1. The court may:
a. Order any party to produce and
permit the inspection and copying or
photographing,
(1) By or on behalf of the moving
party
How Done:
1. Motion for examination is filed
2. Filed in the court in which the action is
pending
3. Court may, in its discretion, order him to
submit
to
a
physical
or
mental
examination by a physician
Refusal to
answer any
question
(Sec. 1 and
2)
Refusal to
be Sworn
(Sec. 2)
Refusal to
answer
designated
questions or
refusal to
produce
documents
or to submit
to physical
or mental
examination
SANCTIONS
(Sec. 3)
1. The court may, upon proper
application, compel a
refusing deponent to answer
(Sec. 1)
a. If granted, and refusal to
answer is without
substantial justification,
court may require the
refusing party to pay
proponent the
reasonable expenses
incurred in obtaining the
order
b. If denied, and filed
without substantial
justification, court may
require proponent to pay
refusing party the
reasonable expenses
incurred in obtaining the
order
2. A refusal to answer after
being directed by court to do
so may be constituted as
contempt of court
Cite the disobedient deponent in
contempt of court
The court may make the
following orders:
1. Prohibit the disobedient
party to introduce evidence
of physical or mental
condition
2. Refuse to allow the
disobedient party to support
or oppose claims or defenses
3. Strike out pleadings or parts
thereof
TRIAL
DEFINITION
A trial is the judicial process of investigating and
determining the legal controversies, starting with
the production of evidence by the plaintiff and
ending with his closing arguments [Acosta v.
People (1962)].
Refusal to
admit under
Rule 26
(Sec. 4)
Failure of
party to
attend or
serve
answers to
written
interrogatori
es
(Sec. 5)
AND
POSTPONEMENTS
Stipulation Of Facts in
Criminal Cases
Must be signed by
both counsel and
accused
Strict; it must always
be in writing
Exceptions:
1. Provisions on separate trials under Rule
31, Sec. 2
2. When for special reasons the court directs
otherwise
REQUISITES
TRIAL
OF
MOTION
TO
POSTPONE
presents
SEVERANCE
When proper: This contemplates a single action
having a number of claims, counterclaims, crossclaims, third-party complaints or issues which
may be separately tried
This
provision
permitting
separate
trials
presupposes that the claims involved are within
the jurisdiction of the court
- When one of the claims is not within its
jurisdiction,
the
same
should
be
dismissed, so that it may be filed in the
proper court
CONSOLIDATION
OR
SEVERANCE
HEARING OR TRIAL (Rule 31)
OF
CONSOLIDATION
When proper: When actions involving a common
question of fact or law are pending before the
court
Court action: The court may:
1. Order a joint hearing or trial of any or all
matters in issue in the actions
2. Order all actions consolidated
3. Such orders concerning proceedings
therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary
costs or delay
Purpose: To avoid multiplicity of suits, guard
against oppression or abuse, prevent delay, clear
congested dockets, simplify the work of the trial
court and save unnecessary costs and expenses
Where a case has been partially tried before one
judge, the consolidation of the same with
another related case pending before another
judge who had no opportunity to observe the
demeanor of the witness during trial makes the
consolidation
not
mandatory.
[PCGG
v.
Sandiganbayan (1992)]
It has been held that the rules do not distinguish
between cases filed before the same branch or
judge and those that are pending in different
branches or before different judges of the same
court, in order that consolidation may be proper,
as long as the cases involve the resolution of
questions of law or facts in common with each
other (Active Woods Products Co. Inc. v. CA)
1. When filed:
a. Filed upon completion of the trial or
hearing or proceeding before the
commissioner
b. Filed with the court
Powers of Commissioner:
1. Exercise
power
to
proceeding before him
the
2. Contents:
a. Report in writing upon the matters
submitted to him by the order of
reference
b. When his powers are not specified or
limited, he shall set forth his findings
of fact and conclusions of law in his
report
c. He shall attach all exhibits, affidavits,
depositions, papers, and transcripts, if
any,
of
testimonial
evidence
presented before him
NOTICE AND HEARING ON THE REPORT (Rule 32,
Sec. 10 and 11)
Upon filing of the report of the commissioner:
1. Parties shall be notified by the clerk
2. Parties shall be allowed 10 days within
which to object to the findings of the
report
NOTE: Objections to the report based
upon grounds which were available to the
parties during the proceedings before the
commissioner shall not be considered by
DEMURRER TO EVIDENCE
CONCEPTS:
Definition - A species of MTD that may be
invoked based on insufficiency of evidence (i.e.
upon the facts and the law the plaintiff has
shown no right to relief). [Rule 33, Sec. 1]
It is invoked after the plaintiff has presented all
the evidence available to him
Judgment on Demurrer to Evidence It is a
judgment rendered by the court dismissing a
case upon motion of defendant, made after
plaintiff has rested his case, on the ground that
upon the facts presented and the law on the
matter, plaintiff has not shown any right to relief.
Distinctions
DEMURRER TO
EVIDENCE
It is presented after
the plaintiff has rested
his case
The ground is based
on the insufficiency of
evidence
If the motion is
denied, the defendant
may present his
evidence
If the motion is
granted, the
complaint is dismissed
The plaintiffs remedy
is to appeal
MOTION TO DISMISS
Presented before a
responsive pleading is
made by the
defendant
It may be based on
any of those
enumerated in Rule 16
If the motion to
dismiss is denied, the
defendant may file his
responsive pleading
If the motion to
dismiss is granted, the
complaint is dismissed
and depending on the
ground, the complaint
may be re-filed
Grant of demurrer
The case shall be
dismissed
Plaintiff's remedy
would be to appeal.
However, if the order
granting the demurrer
is reversed on appeal,
the defendant loses
his right to present
evidence. [Rule 33,
Sec 1; Republic v.
Tuvera (2007)]
The appellate court
should render
judgment on the basis
of the evidence
submitted by the
plaintiff. [Radiowealth
Finance v. Del Rosario
(2000)]
Equivalent to
judgment (i.e. based
on the merits of the
evidence presented
so far)
An interlocutory order
and not appealable.
However, it may be
the subject of a
petition for certiorari
for GAD under Rule 65
[Katigbak v.
Sandiganbayan
(2003)]
Denial of demurrer
MOTION DENIED
xxx
MOTION GRANTED
BUT REVERSED ON
APPEAL
Movant is deemed to
have waived his right
to present evidence.
The decision of the
appellate court will be
based only on the
evidence of the
plaintiff as the
defendant loses his
right to have the case
remanded for
reception of his
evidence
Denial is
INTERLOCUTORY
Sec. 1, Rule 36 (that
judgment should state
clearly and distinctly
the facts and the law
on which it is based)
will NOT apply.
The denial is NOT
appealable
CRIMINAL CASES
May be filed with or
without leave of court.
Leave of court is
necessary so that the
accused could present
his evidence if
demurrer is denied
If the court finds the
prosecutions evidence
insufficient, it will
grant demurrer by
rendering judgment of
JUDGMENTS AND
FINAL ORDERS
JUDGMENTS IN GENERAL
Definition - The final ruling by a court of
competent jurisdiction regarding the rights and
obligations of the parties or other matters
submitted to it in an action/proceeding
[Macahilig v. Heirs of Magalit (2000)]
Requisites of a Valid Judgmen (Rule 36, Sec. 1;
Art. VIII, Sec. 14, 1987 Constitution)
1. Court/tribunal must be with authority to
hear and determine the matter before it;
2. Court must have jurisdiction over the
parties and the subject matter;
3. Parties must have been given an
opportunity to adduce evidence in their
behalf;
4. Evidence must have been considered by
the tribunal in deciding the case; [Acosta
v. COMELEC (1998)]
5. Judgment must be in writing, personally
and directly prepared by the judge. A
verbal judgment is, under the law,
complaint
The judgment of
dismissal is
appealable.
If plaintiff appeals and
judgment is reversed
by the appellate
court, it will decide
the case on the basis
of plaintiffs evidence
with the consequence
that the defendant
already loses his right
to present evidence.
There is no res
judicata in dismissal
due to demurrer.
The plaintiff files a
motion to deny
motion to demurrer to
evidence
acquittal.
Judgment of acquittal
is NOT appealable.
Double jeopardy sets
in.
CONTENTS OF A JUDGMENT
Parts of a Judgment
1. Body, Ratio decidendi, or Opinion of the
court It contains the findings of facts
and conclusions of law;
2. Fallo, or Disposition of the case It is the
dispositive part of the judgment that
actually settles and declares the rights
and obligations of the parties, finally,
definitively, and authoritatively [Light Rail
Transit Authority v. CA] (2004); The part
of the judgment that is subject to
execution [Riano]
3. Signature of the judge
Distinction between Judgment and Opinion of
the Court
1. A judgment (or FALLO) must be
distinguished from an opinion.
2. The latter is the informal expression of
the views of the court and cannot prevail
against its final order or decision.
3. While the two may be combined in one
instrument, the opinion forms no part of
the judgment.
4. So there is a distinction between the
findings and conclusions of a court and its
judgment.
5. While they may constitute its decision
and amount to a rendition of a judgment
they are not the judgment itself.
6. They amount to nothing more than an
order for judgment, which, of course,
must be distinguished from the judgment.
[Freeman on Judgments, Vol. I, 5th
Edition, page 6, quoted in Casilan v.
Salcedo (1969)]
Conflict Between Dispositive Portion and Body of
Decision
Rule: Where there is a conflict between the fallo
and the body of the decision, the fallo controls.
Qualification: This rule applies only when the
dispositive
part
is
definite,
clear,
and
unequivocal [Union Bank v. Pacific Equipment
Corporation (2008)]
Basis: The fallo is the final order. The opinion in
the body is merely a statement ordering nothing
[Poland
Industrial
Limited
v.
National
Development Company (2005)]
SUMMARY JUDGMENTS
When
Claimant
Defendant
WHEN
THE
ADJUDICATED
CASE
IS
NOT
FULLY
JUDGMENT ON
THE
PLEADINGS
JUDGMENT BY
DEFAULT
Based on the
pleadings,
depositions,
admissions,
and affidavits
Based solely
on the
pleadings
Based on the
complaint and
evidence, if
presentation
is required
Available to
both plaintiff
and
defendant
Generally
available only
to the plaintiff,
unless the
defendant
presents a
counterclaim
Available to
plaintiff
The answer
fails to tender
an issue or
there is an
admission of
material
allegations
No issue as no
answer is filed
by the
defending
party
3-day notice
required
3-day notice
rule applies
On the merits
On the merits
Available in
any action
except
annulment of
marriage, or
legal
separation
cases
Available in
any action
except
annulment of
marriage, or
legal
separation
cases
There is
already an
answer filed
There is no
answer filed
There is no
genuine issue
between the
parties
i.e. There
may be
issues but
these are
irrelevant
10-day notice
required
May be
interlocutory
or on the
merits
Available only
in actions to
recover a
debt, or for a
liquidated
sum of
money or for
declaratory
relief
If filed by
plaintiff, it
must be filed
at any time
after an
answer is
served.
If filed by
defendant,
may be filed
at any time
even before
there is
answer
DEFINITION
The entry of judgment refers to the physical act
performed by the clerk of court in entering the
dispositive portion of the judgment in the book
of entries of judgment after the same has
become final and executory. [Riano]
AMENDMENTS TO JUDGMENT
Exceptions:
1. Clerical errors
2. Nunc Pro Tunc entries
3. Void judgments - Final judgment can be
annulled on the ground of fraud or lack of
jurisdiction or contrary to law (Panlilio v.
Garcia)
4. Whenever circumstances transpire after
finality of the decision making its
execution unjust and inequitable:
a. Cases where, because of supervening
events, it becomes imperative, in the
higher interest of justice, to direct its
modification in order to harmonize the
disposition
with
the
prevailing
circumstances (Seavan Carrier Inc. v.
GTI Sportswear Corp.)
b. Whenever
it
is
necessary
to
accomplish the aims of justice
(Pascual v. Tan)
Entry of judgment
POST-JUDGMENT
REMEDIES
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
AND MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
REMEDIES BEFORE FINALITY OF JUDGMENT
1. Motion for reconsideration
2. Motion for new trial
3. Appeal
Amended/clarified
judgment
An entirely new
decision and
supersedes the
original judgment
Court makes a
thorough study of the
original judgment and
renders the amended
and clarified
judgment only after
considering all the
factual and legal
issues
Supplemental
decision
Does not take the
place of or extinguish
the original judgment
DEFINITION
A motion for reconsideration under Rule 37 is
directed against a judgment or final order. It is
not
the
motion
for
reconsideration
of
interlocutory order, which often precedes a
petition for certiorari under Rule 65. It does not
apply to cases that fall under Summary
Procedure.
GROUNDS: (Rule 37, Sec. 1)
Grounds for Motion for New Trial:
1. FAME
Fraud,
accident,
mistake,
excusable negligence
a. Conditions:
(1) Which ordinary prudence could not
have guarded against; and
(2) By reason of which such aggrieved
party has probably been impaired
in his rights
NOTE: Fraud must be extrinsic fraud
which means any fraudulent scheme
executed by the prevailing party outside
of the trial against the losing party who
because of such fraud is prevented from
presenting his side of the case.
2. Newly discovered evidence
a. Requisites:
(1) It must have been discovered after
the trial
(2) It could not have been discovered
and produced at the trial even
with the exercise of reasonable
diligence; and
(3) The evidence is of such weight
that if admitted, would probably
alter the result of the action; and
(4) It must be material and not merely
collateral,
cumulative,
or
corroborative
Grounds for Motion for Reconsideration:
1. Damages awarded are excessive
2. Evidence is insufficient to justify the
decision or final order
3. The decision or final order is contrary to
law
WHEN TO FILE:
An aggrieved party may file a motion for new
trial or reconsideration within the period for
taking an appeal.
The motions are filed with the court which
rendered the questioned judgment or final order.
The period for appeal is within 15 days after
notice to the appellant of the judgment or final
order appealed from. The 15-day period is
deemed to commence upon receipt by the
counsel of record, which is considered notice to
the parties. Service upon the parties themselves
is prohibited and is not considered as official
receipt of judgment.
Effect of Filing The filing of a timely motion
interrupts the period to appeal.
FORM AND CONTENTS (Rule 37, Sec. 2)
Form:
1. The motion must comply with the
provisions of Rule 15 otherwise it will not
be accepted for filing and/or will not
OF
MOTION
AND
COURT
APPEALS IN GENERAL
NATURE OF APPEAL
MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Grounds:
1. Damages
awarded
are
excessive
2. That evidence
is insufficient to
justify
the
decision or final
order
3. That
decision
or final order is
contrary to law
Second motion from
Second motion may
the same party is
be allowed so long as
prohibited.
based on grounds not The prohibition applies
existing or available
only to final orders or
at the time the first
judgments, hence it is
motion was made
allowed in
interlocutory orders
If the court finds that
If a new trial is
excessive damages
granted, original
have been awarded or
judgment or final
that the judgment or
order is vacated.
final order is contrary
The case stands for
to the evidence or law,
trial de novo and will
it may amend such
be tried anew
judgment or final order
accordingly
Available even on
Available against the
appeal but only on the
judgments or final
ground of newly
orders or both the trial
discovered evidence
and appellate courts
Both are prohibited motions under Summary
Procedure
Interlocutory Order
Disposes of the
matter in its
entirety, leaving
nothing more to be
done but to enforce
execution
Appealable
Not appealable
except through a
petition for
certiorari under Rule
65
No need to comply
with such a
requirement
PETITION FOR
REVIEW
PETITION FOR
REVIEW ON
CERTIORARI
Rule 42
Rule 45
Case decided
by RTC in the
exercise of its
appellate
jurisdiction
Petition for
review with
the CA
Case decided
by the RTC,
CA, CTA, and
Sandiganbaya
n
File notice of
appeal or
record of
appeal with
court of
origin and
give a copy
to adverse
party
File a verified
petition for
review with
CA.
Pay docket
and lawful
fees and P500
as deposit for
costs with the
CA.
Furnish RTC
and adverse
party a copy of
such
Within 15
days from
notice of
judgment for
notice of
Within 15 days
from notice of
decision to be
reviewed or
from denial of
Appealed to
the SC
File verified
petition for
review on
certiorari with
the SC.
Pay docket
and lawful
fees and P500
for costs.
Submit proof
of service of a
copy to the
lower court
and adverse
party
Within 15
days from
notice of
judgment or
order of
appeal and
30 days for
records on
appeal
a MFR or MFNT
denial of MFR
or MFNT
EXTENSIONS
MTC to RTC
By notice of appeal;
No
within 15 days from
extensions
notice of judgment
allowed
or final order
By record of
appeal;
within 30 days from
notice of judgment
or final order
RTC to CA
By notice of appeal;
Within 15 days
No
from notice of
extensions
judgment or final
allowed
order
By record of
appeal;
within 30 days from
notice of judgment
or final order
MTC to RTC to CA
15 days from notice The CA may
of the judgment or
grant a 15
final order OR from
day
denial of MR or
extension.
MNT
No further
extension
shall be
granted
except for
EFFECT OF
MR or MNT
Interrupts
period to
appeal
Interrupts
period to
appeal
the most
compelling
reasons and
in no case
longer than
15 days.
QJA to CA
The CA may
grant a 15
day
15 days from notice
extension.
of the award,
No further
judgment, final
extension
order or resolution
shall be
or from date of last
granted
publication if
except for
required by law OR
the most
from denial of MR
compelling
or MNT
reasons and
in no case
longer than
15 days.
RTC to SC
RTC to CA to SC
CA to SC
15 days from notice
The SC may
of judgment or final
grant a 30
order OR from
day
denial of
extension for
petitioners MR or
justifiable
MNT.
reasons.
Fresh
period to
appeal
from denial
MR or MNT
Fresh
period to
appeal
from denial
MR or MNT
Fresh
period to
appeal
from denial
MR or MNT
PERFECTION OF APPEAL
Perfection of an appeal in the manner and within
the period laid down by law is mandatory and
jurisdictional. [Balgami v. CA (2004)]
Effect of Failure to Perfect Appeal
By Record on Appeal
1. Record on appeal is required for the
following cases:
a. Special proceedings
b. In such other cases where multiple
appeals are allowed
2. Form and contents of the record on
appeal: (Rule 41, Sec. 6)
a. Within 15 days from perfection of
appeal, clerk of court or the branch
clerk of the lower court shall transmit
to the RTC:
(1) Original record or record on appeal
(2) Together with transcripts and
exhibits
b. Clerk shall make a certification that
the documents are complete
c. Clerk shall also furnish the parties a
copy of his letter of transmittal of the
records to the appellate court
3. Copy is served on the adverse party
4. Payment in full of docket fees and other
lawful fees
PERFECTION OF APPEAL
Since appeals from inferior courts may now be
either by notice of appeal or record on appeal,
the rules on the perfection and the effect thereof
are the same. See Sec. 9, Rule 41
APPEAL FROM ORDERS DISMISSING THE
CASE
WITHOUT
TRIAL;
LACK
OF
JURISDICTION (Rule 40, Sec. 8)
Two Scenarios:
1. If the MTC dismissed the case without
trial on the merits, the RTC may:
a. AFFIRM, if the ground of dismissal is
lack of jurisdiction over the subject
matter
(1) If the RTC has jurisdiction, it shall
try the case on the merits as if the
case was originally filed therein
b. REVERSE, in which case,
remand
the
case
for
proceedings
it shall
further
final
order
Appellees Brief:
1. Filed within 45 days from receipt of
appellants brief
2. Manner of filing is similar to that in
appellants brief
Contents:
1. Subject index
2. Statement
of
Facts
Statement of Facts
3. Arguments
and
Counter-
WITH
4. Copy of
petitioner
the
comment
served
on
stays
the
Exceptions:
1. Unless the CA, law, or Rules, provide
otherwise
2. Also in civil cases decided under the
Rule on Summary Procedure; Stay of
judgment is not applicable here since
these are immediately executory
Form of Comment:
1. An original is filed, properly marked,
together with 2 copies with their annexes
(Efficient Use of Paper Rule)
2. Accompanied by certified true copies of
such material portions of the record
referred to therein
3. Together with other supporting papers
OR
FINAL
OR
FINAL
OR
FINAL
OR
FINAL
Involves review of
judgment, award or
final order on merits
Petitioner and
respondent are
original parties to the
action
Prior filing of MR not
required
Appellate court is in
the exercise of
appellate jurisdiction
and power of review
CERTIORARI AS AN
ACTION
Rule 65
Petition raises the
issue as to whether
the lower court acted
without or in excess of
jurisdiction or with
grave abuse of
discretion
May be directed
against an
interlocutory order of
the court prior to
appeal from the
judgment or where
there is no appeal or
any other plain,
speedy, or adequate
remedy
May be filed not later
than 60 days from
notice of judgment,
order or resolution
sought to be assailed
Does not stay the
challenged
proceedings
(unless a writ of
preliminary injunction
or TRO is issued)
The parties are the
aggrieved party
against the lower court
or quasi-judicial
agency as prevailing
parties
A filing of a MR is a
condition precedent,
subject to certain
exceptions
Higher court exercises
original jurisdiction
under its power of
control and
supervision over
proceedings of lower
courts
QUESTIONS OF FACT
Doubt or difference as
to the truth or
falsehood of facts, or
as to probative value
of the evidence
presented
The determination
involves evaluation or
review of evidence
2.
3.
4.
5.
RULE 41
ORDINARY APPEAL
Matter of Right; Filed with the court of origin
All records are elevated from court of origin
Appeal from a decision of
Appeal from a judgment or
the RTC in the exercise of
final order of a MTC
its original jurisdiction
RULE 40
Filed with the MTC
Appeal to the RTC
Questions of fact or mixed
questions of fact and law
RULE 40
RULE 41
Filed with the RTC
Appeal to the CA
Questions of fact or mixed
questions of fact and law
RULE 41
BY NOTICE OF APPEAL
Within 15 days after notice of judgment or final order
BY RECORD ON APPEAL
Within 30 days from notice of judgment or final order by
filing a notice of appeal and a record on appeal
WHEN PROPER
RULE 42
RULE 43
RULE 45
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Discretionary; No records are elevated unless the court decrees it
Filed with the appellate court
Appeals to the SC from a
judgment or final order or
resolution of the CA,
Sandiganbayan, CTA en
banc, RTC (original
Appeals from awards,
jurisdiction) or such other
Appeal from a decision of
judgments, final orders or
courts as may be
the RTC rendered in the
resolution of or authorized
authorized by law
exercise of its appellate
by any quasi-judicial
Decisions, final orders, or
jurisdiction
agency in the exercise of its
resolutions of the CA in any
quasi-judicial functions
case, regardless of the
nature of the action or
proceedings involved, may
be appealed to the SC by
filing a petition for review,
WHERE TO FILE
RULE 42
RULE 43
RULE 45
Filed with the CA
Filed with the CA
Filed with the SC
Appeal to the CA
Appeal to the CA
Appeal to the SC
Questions of fact, Questions Questions of fact, Questions
of law, or Mixed questions
of law, or Mixed questions
Only Questions of Law
of both
of fact and law
TIME FOR FILING
RULE 42
RULE 43
RULE 45
Within 15 days from:
1. Notice of award,
Within 15 days from:
judgment, final
1. Notice of judgment,
Within 15 days from notice
order, or resolution
final order, or
of decision, or
OR
resolution appealed
Within 15 days from notice
2. Date of publication,
from, or
of denial of petitioners
if publication is
2. Notice of denial of
motion for new trial or
required by law for
motion for new trial
reconsideration
its effectivity, OR
or reconsideration
3. Denial of
filed in due time
petitioners MNT or
after notice of
MR (only one MR
judgment
allowed)
verified
verified
WHEN PROPER
RULE 37 v. RULE 38
Rule 38 can be availed of once the judgment has become final and
executory.
RULE 37
Available BEFORE
judgment becomes
final and executory
Applies to judgments
or final orders only
Grounds: (1) FAME
and (2) Newly
discovered evidence
Filed within the time
to appeal
If denied, order of
denial is not
appealable; hence,
remedy is appeal from
judgment
Legal remedy
Motion need not be
RULE 38
Available AFTER
judgment has become
final and executory
Applies to judgments,
final orders and other
proceedings
Ground: FAME
Filed within 60 days
from knowledge of
judgment and within 6
months from entry of
judgment
If denied, order
denying a petition for
relief is not
appealable; remedy is
appropriate civil action
under Rule 65
Equitable remedy
Petition must be
When
1.
2.
3.
required to consider it
as an ordinary civil
action
NATURE
The purpose of such action is to have the final and executory judgment
set aside so that there will be a renewal of litigation.
A person who is not a party to the judgment may sue for its annulment
provided that he can prove the same was obtained through fraud or
collusion and that he would be adversely affected thereby. (Alaban v.
CA)
JUDGMENTS, FINAL
ORDERS, OR
RESOLUTIONS OF THE
MTC
Filed with the RTC
RTC as a court of
general jurisdiction
under Sec. 19(6) BP
129
The RTC has no such
discretion, it is
PERIOD
OF
FILING
EXTRINSIC
FRAUD
4 years from
discovery of
fraud
LACK OF
JURISDICTION
Before it is barred
by laches or
estoppel
There must be a manifest showing with petition that it was filed within
the 4-yr period.
The rule does not fix the period to annul judgment based on lack of
jurisdiction but recognizes the principle of estoppel as first laid down by
Tijam v. Sibonghanoy.
FORM AND CONTENTS OF PETITION (Rule 47, Sec. 3)
1. Verified petition, alleging therein:
a. With particularity, the facts and the law relied upon
b. Petitioners good and substantial cause of action or defense
2. Filed following the Efficient Use of Paper Rule
3. Certified true copy of the judgment or final order or resolution
shall be attached to the original copy of the petition
4. Affidavits of witnesses or documents supporting the cause of
action or defense; and
5. Certificate of non-forum shopping
PROCEEDINGS
There are two stages in the disposition of the petition:
1. A preliminary evaluation of the petition for prima facie merit
(Sec. 5)
The rule allows the CA to dismiss the petition outright as in
special civil actions
If prima facie merit is found, petition is given due course and
summons is served on respondent
2. If prima facie merit is found, petition is given due course and
issuance of summons as in ordinary civil cases is made (Sec. 6)
Procedure in ordinary civil cases is observed
EXECUTION,
SATISFACTION, AND
EFFECT OF JUDGMENTS
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FINALITY OF JUDGMENT FOR
PURPOSES OF APPEAL; FOR PURPOSES OF
EXECUTION
The term finality of judgment for purposes of appeal refers to
interlocutory orders which:
1. Are not decisions within the constitutional definition [Armargo v.
CA (1973)]
2. are those that determine incidental matters that do not touch on
the merits of the case or put an end to proceedings. The
following are examples of an interlocutory order:
a. An order denying a motion to dismiss;
b. An order granting an extension of time to file a pleading, or
one authorizing an amendment thereof;
c. Order granting or denying applications for postponement or
inspection of documents. [Riano]
The word interlocutory refers to something intervening between the
commencement and the end of a suit which decides some point or
matter but is not a final decision of the whole controversy. [Ramiscal, Jr.
v. Sandiganbayan (2004)]
A final judgment or order is one that finally disposes of a case, leaving
nothing more to be done by the Court in respect thereto, e.g., an
adjudication on the merits which, on the basis of the evidence
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
If appeal has
been perfected
and finally
resolved
EXECUTION AS A
MATTER OF RIGHT
Period to appeal has
already lapsed and no
appeal is perfected
Ministerial duty of the
the court
Upon showing of good
reason for execution
court
Provided there are no
supervening events
HOW EXECUTION IS
CARRIED
Prevailing party:
1. Files a motion with
notice to the adverse
party
2. Motion is filed with
the TRIAL court
3. Good reasons must
be shown
The prevailing party:
1. Files a motion with
notice to adverse
party
2. Motion is filed with
the
APPELLATE
COURT
3. Good reasons must
be shown
WHEN ENFORCED
Within 5 years from date of entry
of judgment
After the lapse of 5 years from
date of entry and before it is
barred by statute of limitations
which is 10 years from date of
entry (Art. 1144(3))
If it be against real or
personal property in
the hands of personal
representatives, heirs,
devisees, legatees,
tenants, or trustees of
judgment obligor
To satisfy judgment
plus interest out of his
real or personal
property
To satisfy judgment
with interest out of
such
If it be for delivery or
possession of real or
personal property
Levy is the act whereby a sheriff sets apart or appropriates for the
purpose of satisfying the command of the writ, a part or the whole of
the judgment debtors property.
Procedure:
1. Levy shall be made by serving notice upon:
a. The person owing such debts, or
b. Having in his possession or control such credits to which
judgment obligor is entitled
certified bank
is punishable by
Examples:
1. A judgment in mandamus to reinstate petitioner as chief clinic of
the hospital (Vital-Gozon v. CA)
2. A judgment directing petitioner to vacate the land which is a
judgment to deliver possession of real property and not special
judgment. No contempt for refusal (Moslem v. Soriano)
3. A judgment directing defendant to remove a fence from a certain
place is a special judgment (Marquez v. Marquez)
NOTE: The power of the court in execution extends only over properties
UNQUESTIONABLY belonging to judgment debtor.
CONCEPTS
Rule 39, Sec. 16 and other provisions which provide for a mode of
recovering property allegedly to have been wrongfully taken by sheriff
pursuant to a writ of execution or other process, refers to a STRANGER
to an action.
Remedies of Third-Party Claimant:
1. Summary hearing before the court which authorized the
execution
2. Terceria or third-party claim filed with the sheriff (Rule 39, Sec.
16)
3. Action for damages on the bond posted by the judgment creditor
4. Independent reivindicatory action
The aforementioned are cumulative remedies and may be resorted to
by a third-party claimant independently of or separately from and
without need of availing of the others. [Sy v. Discaya (1990)]
For a Third-Party Claim to be Sufficient:
1. Must be filed by a person other than the defendant or his agent,
at any time before sale
2. Must be under oath or supported by affidavit stating the
claimants title to, or right of possession of, the property, and
grounds therefor
3. Must be served upon the officer making levy and a copy thereof
upon the judgment creditor
The timing of the filing of the claim is important because it determines
the remedies available to the claimant:
1. If the claim is filed under Rule 39, Sec. 16:
a. Claimant may vindicate his claim in a separate action
b. Intervention is no longer allowed since judgment has already
been rendered
2. If the claim is filed under Sec. 14, Rule 57 (Attachment) or under
Sec. 7, Rule 60 (Replevin)
a. Claimant may vindicate his claim by intervention as he has a
legal interest in the matter of litigation
b. Intervention is allowed as these actions are still pending in
court
RULES ON REDEMPTION
WHEN AVAILABLE
1. For personal property there is NO right of redemption as the
sale is absolute
2. For real property right of redemption is available
WHO MAY REDEEM REAL PROPERTY SO SOLD (Rule 39, Sec. 27)
Who may redeem:
1. Judgment obligor, or his successor in interest, in the whole or
any part of the property
2. Remptioner who is a creditor having a lien by virtue of an
attachment, judgment or mortgage on the property sold,
subsequent to the lien which the property was sold
Successors-in-interest - They include, among others, one to whom the
debtor has conveyed HIS INTEREST in the property for purposes of
redemption
The Redemptioner
He is a creditor with a lien SUBSEQUENT to the judgment which was the
basis of the execution sale.
Unlike the judgment debtor, a redemptioner must prove his right to
redeem by producing the documents required in Sec. 30, to wit:
1. Copy of the judgment or final order under which he claims the
right to redeem certified by the clerk wherein judgment or final
order was entered OR
2. If he redeems upon a mortgage or other lien, a memorandum of
the record thereof, certified by the Register of Deeds; OR
3. An original or certified copy of any assignment necessary to
establish his claim; OR
4. An affidavit executed by him or his agent showing the amount
then actually due on the lien (Sec. 30)
If the lien of the creditor is PRIOR to the judgment under which the
property was sold:
1. He is not a redemptioner
2. He cannot redeem since his interests in his lien are fully
protected. Any purchaser at a public auction takes the same
subject to such prior lien which he has to satisfy
WHEN
Within 1 year from date of
registration of certificate of
sale
Within 1 year from date of
registration of certificate of
sale
Within 60 days from last
redemption
PROVIDED that judgment
debtor has not exercised his
right of redemption
In all cases, judgment debtor shall have the entire 1 year period from
date of registration of sale to redeem the property. If judgment debtor
redeems, no further redemption is allowed (Sec. 29).
NOTE: There is no extension or interruption of redemption period.
REDEMPTION PRICE
1. By
a.
b.
c.
2. By
a.
b.
c.
6. Collect rents, earning and income derived from property until the
expiration of period of redemption
EXPIRATION OF REDEMPTION PERIOD (Rule 39, Sec. 33)
Judgment obligor shall have the entire period of ONE YEAR from date of
registration of sale to redeem the property
Entitlement to a CONVEYANCE and POSSESSION:
1. To the PURCHASER
If there is no redemption made within 1 year from date of
registration of the certificate of sale
2. To the LAST REDEMPTIONER
If there was redemption, and 60 days have elapsed and no
other redemption has been made
Notice must have been given, and the redemption period has
elapsed
Two Documents which the Sheriff Executes in case of Real Property
1. CERTIFICATE OF SALE
After auction sale, he will execute in favor of the purchaser
the certificate of sale under Sec. 25
From registration of said certificate, the one year redemption
period starts
Certificate of sale after execution sale is merely a memorial
of the fact of sale and does not operate as conveyance
2. DEED OF CONVEYANCE
Issued if after expiration of redemption period there is no
redemption
Operates to transfer to purchaser whatever rights the
judgment debtor had in the property
The effect of a final deed of sale transfers the right as of the
time of the levy
RECOVERY OF PRICE IF SALE IS NOT EFFECTIVE (Rule 39, Sec. 34)
Purchaser may recover the purchase price WHEN:
1. Purchaser or his successor-in-interest fails to recover possession
the property; or
2. Evicted due to:
a. Irregularities in the proceedings concerning the sale; or
CONCLUSIVENESS OF
JUDGMENT
There is only identity
of parties and subject
matter
Cause of action are
different
The first judgment is
conclusiveness only as
to matters directly
adjudged and actually
litigated in the first
action.
The second action can
be prosecuted
Preclusion of issues
only
IN PERSONAM
(Paragraph B)
The judgment or final
order is CONCLUSIVE
as between parties
and their successors in
interest, litigating for
the same thing and
under the same title
an in the same
capacity
e.g. accion
reinvindicatoria
Conclusive as to
Stare Decisis - When the SC has laid down a principle of law applicable
to a certain state of facts, it will adhere to that principle and apply to it
all future cases where the facts are substantially the same
Doctrine of the Law of the Case - Whatever is once irrevocably
established as the controlling legal rule or decision between the same
parties in the case continues to be the law of the case whether correct
on general principles or not, so long as the facts on which such decision
was predicated continue to be the facts of the case before the court.
As discussed in Ayala Corp. v. Rosa-Diana Realty, 2000:
Res Judicata
The ruling in one
case is carried over
to another case
between the same
parties
Stare Decisis
EFFECT
Judgment is
CONCLUSIVE upon the
title to the thing
Judgment is
PRESUMPTIVE evidence
of a right as between
parties and their
successors-in-interest
by a subsequent title
In both cases, judgment may be repelled by evidence of:
1. Want of jurisdiction
2. Want of notice
3. Collusion
4. Fraud
5. Clear mistake of law or fact
PROVISIONAL REMEDIES
NATURE OF PROVISIONAL REMEDIES
Provisional remedies are writs and processes available during the
pendency of the action which may be resorted to by a litigant for the
preservation or protection of their rights and interests therein pending
rendition, and for purposes of the ultimate effects, of a final judgment in
the case; also known as ancillary or auxiliary remedies.
They are applied to a pending litigation, for the purpose of securing the
judgment or preserving the status quo, and in some cases after
judgment, for the purpose of preserving or disposing of the subject
matter. [Calo v. Roldan (1946)]
Orders granting or denying provisional remedies are merely
interlocutory and cannot be the subject of an appeal. They may
however be challenged before a superior court through a petition for
certiorari under Rule 65.
The Provisional Remedies under the Rules of Court
1. Preliminary Attachment (Rule 57)
2. Preliminary Injunction (Rule 58)
3. Receivership (Rule 59)
4. Replevin (Rule 60)
5. Support Pendente Lite (Rule 61)
NOTE: The enumeration above is not exclusive. The court may
invoke its equity jurisdiction and order the appropriate reliefs during
the pendency of an action
PRELIMINARY ATTACHMENT
DEFINITION
A provisional remedy issued upon order of the court where an action is
pending to be levied upon the property of the defendant so the property
may be held by the sheriff as security for the satisfaction of whatever
judgment may be rendered in the case [Davao Light v CA ](1991)
PURPOSES
1. To seize the property of the debtor in advance of final judgment
and to hold it for purposes of satisfying the said judgment.
2. To enable the court to acquire jurisdiction over the action by the
actual or constructive seizure of the property in those instances
where personal service of summons on the creditor cannot be
effected. [Quasha v. Juan (1982)]
GROUNDS FOR ISSUANCE (Rule 57, Sec. 1)
There are only specific situations where preliminary attachment may
issue. The grounds are EXCLUSIVE:
1. Action for recovery of a specified amount of money or damages,
EXCEPT moral and exemplary,
a. On a cause of action arising from law, contract, quasicontract, delict, or quasi-delict
b. Against a party who is about to depart from the Philippines
with intent to defraud his creditors;
2. Action for money or property, embezzled or fraudulently
misapplied or converted to his own use by either:
a. A public officer, an officer of a corporation, an attorney,
factor, broker, agent, or clerk, in the course of his
employment as such,
b. OR by any other person in a fiduciary capacity, or for a willful
violation of duty;
3. Action to recover the possession of property unjustly or
fraudulently taken, detained or converted,
a. When the property, or any part thereof, has been concealed,
removed, or disposed of to prevent its being found or taken
by the applicant or an authorized person;
in that said debtor had a preconceived plan or intention not to pay the
creditor. [Equitable v. Special Steel (2012)]
ISSUANCE AND CONTENTS OF ORDER OF ATTACHMENT (Rule 57,
Sec. 2)
When may one apply: A preliminary attachment may be applied for
1. At the commencement of the action or
2. At any time before the entry of judgment.
Who may apply: It may be applied for by the plaintiff OR any proper
party (including a defendant who filed a counterclaim, cross-claim, or a
third party complaint)
Methods to Procure Preliminary Attachment:
1. Writ may be prayed for in the complaint itself providing the
allegations warranting its issuance
2. May be issued pursuant to a separate motion for attachment
whenever the writ is not prayed for in the original complaint
Three
1.
2.
3.
Only the defendant or party whose property is attached may move for
its lifting. If the attachment is proper, the discharge should be by
counterbond under Sec. 12 (KO Glass v. Valenzuela)
Effect of Dissolution on Plaintiffs Attachment Bond
1. Dissolution of preliminary attachment upon security given, or a
showing if its irregular issuance, does not operate to discharge
the sureties on the attachment bond
2. That bond is executed to adverse party conditioned that the
applicant will pay all the costs which may be adjudged to
adverse party and all damages which he may sustain by reason
of the attachment, if the court shall finally adjudge that
applicant was not entitled thereto (Sec. 4)
3. Until that determination is made, as to applicants entitlement to
attachment, his bond must stand and cannot be withdrawn
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
DEFINITIONS AND DIFFERENCES
Injunction is a judicial writ, process, or proceeding whereby a party is
ordered to do or refrain from doing a particular act
Preliminary Injunction is an ancillary or preventive remedy where a
court requires a person, a party or even a court or tribunal either to
REFRAIN (prohibitory) from or to PERFORM (mandatory) particular acts
during the pendency of an action. It is only a temporary remedy.
Injunction
Main action
seeks a judgment embodying a
final injunction
Based on all evidence gathered
by court to determine main
action
Preliminary injunction
Ancillary; exists only as part or
incident of an independent action
or proceeding
sole object of which is to preserve
the status quo until the merits
can be heard
based solely on initial and
incomplete evidence
Purpose: To prevent future injury and maintain the status quo (i.e. the
last actual, peaceable, uncontested status which preceded the pending
controversy) for [Knecht v. CA, (1993)]
The injunction should not establish new relations between the parties
but merely re-establish the pre-existing relationship between them.
TRO v. Injunction
TRO
May be granted ex parte if great
and irreparable injury would
result otherwise
Injunction
Cannot be granted without notice
and hearing
A TRO is issued in order to preserve the status quo until the hearing of
the application for preliminary injunction. [Bacolod City Water v.
Labayen (2004)]
KINDS OF INJUNCTION
Kinds of Injunction:
1. Preliminary Preventive Injunction Prohibits the performance of
a particular act or acts
2. Preliminary Mandatory Injunction Requires the performance of
a particular act or acts. This is an extreme remedy which will be
granted only on showing that:
a. The invasion of the right is material and substantial
b. Right of complainant is clear and unmistakable
c. There is an urgent and paramount necessity
PRELIMINARY
PROHIBITORY
INJUNCTION
Purpose is to prevent
a person from the
performance of a
particular act
PRELIMINARY
MANDATORY
INJUNCTION
Purpose is to require a
person to perform a
particular act
Status Quo is
preserved
TRO ISSUED BY
ORDINARY JUDGE
TRO
is
RECEIVERSHIP
NATURE
Receiver A person appointed by the court in behalf of all the parties to
the action for the purpose of preserving and conserving the property in
litigation and prevent its possible destruction or dissipation if it were left
in the possession of any of the parties.
Purpose
The purpose of a receivership as a provisional remedy is to protect and
preserve the rights of the parties during the pendency of the main
action, during the pendency of an appeal or as an aid in the execution
of a judgment when the writ of execution has been returned unsatisfied.
The receivership under Rule 59 is directed to the property which is the
subject of the action and does not refer to the receivership authorized
under banking laws and other rules or laws. Rule 59 presupposes that
there is an action and that the property subject of the action requires its
preservation. Receivership under Rule 59 is ancillary to the main action.
(Riano).
The guiding principle is the prevention of imminent danger to the
property. If an action by its nature, does not require such protection or
preservation, said remedy cannot be applied for and granted.
(Commodities Storage v. CA, 1997)
10. Invest funds in his hands, ONLY by order of the court upon the
written consent of all the parties. [Rule 59, Sec. 6]
Liability for refusal or neglect to deliver property to receiver:
1. Contempt; and
2. Be liable to the receiver for the money or the value of the
property and other things so refused or neglected to be
surrendered together with all damages that may have been
sustained by the party or parties entitled thereto as a
consequence of such refusal or neglect. [Rule 59, Sec. 7]
Remedies Against the Receiver
1. No action against receiver can be maintained without leave of
court
2. An aggrieved party may:
a. Take the matter into the court which appointed the receiver
and ask either for an accounting or take some other
proceeding, and ask for consequent judgment on the acts
complained of; or
b. Ask for leave of court to bring him an action directly
TWO KINDS OF BOND
The Applicants Bond
1. Applicant must file a bond executed to the party against whom
the application is presented
a. Amount to be fixed by the court
b. CONDITION: To the effect that applicant will pay such party
all damages he may sustain by reason of the appointment IN
CASE the applicant shall have procured such without
sufficient cause
2. The court may require additional bond after appointment in the
exercise of its discretion as further security for such damages
(Rule 59, Sec. 2)
The Receivers Bond
1. As a precondition before entering into his duties, receiver must
file a bond
2. The bond is executed to such person and in such sum as the
court may direct
3. CONDITION: To the effect that he will faithfully discharge his
duties and obey the orders of the court (Rule 59, Sec. 4)
DAMAGES RESULTING
DAMAGES ARISING
FROM APPOINTMENT
Damages resulting
from appointment
The right is statutory
The damages may be
caused before the
receiver qualifies or
takes possession of
the property
The applicants bond
is responsible
AFTER APPOINTMENT
Damages which arise
due to receivers
negligence or
mismanagement
The right rests on
general principles of
law
Liability rests on the
mismanagement or
negligence of receiver
The receivers bond is
responsible
TERMINATION OF RECEIVERSHIP
REPLEVIN
NATURE
Replevin is the provisional remedy seeking for the possession of the
property prior to the determination of the main action for replevin.
Replevin may also be a main action with the ultimate goal of recovering
personal property capable of manual delivery wrongfully detained by a
person. In this sense, it is a suit in itself
WRIT OF REPLEVIN
The purpose is to
recover personal
property capable of
manual delivery from
the defendant
WRIT OF PRELIMINAY
ATTACHMENT
The purpose is to have
the property put in the
custody of the court to
secure the satisfaction
of the judgment that
may be rendered in
favor of the plaintiff at
some future time
The property does not
belong to the plaintiff
but to the defendant
Available even if
recovery of property is
only incidental to the
relief sought
May be resorted to
even if property is in
possession of a third
person
Can be availed of even
if property is in
custodia legis
Available from
commencement but
before entry of
judgment
Bond is fixed by the
court
Extends only to
personal property
capable of manual
delivery
Available to recover
personal property
even if the same is
not being concealed,
removed, or disposed
of
claimed
describe
with
4. The affidavit must also state the actual value of the property
subject of replevin and not just its probable value. This value will
be the basis of the bond.
The Applicants Bond
1. Executed to the adverse party
2. Amount is DOUBLE the value of the property stated in the
affidavit
3. Conditions of the Bond:
a. The return to of property to adverse party, if such return be
adjudged, and
b. The payment to adverse party of such sum as he may
recover from the applicant in the action
Return of Property (Sec. 5)
1. If the adverse party objects to the sufficiency of the bond, he
cannot immediately require the return of the property even by
counterbond.
2. If the adverse party DOES NOT object to the sufficiency of the
bond, he may require the return of the property
a. When: At any time before delivery to applicant
b. How: By filing a redelivery bond
The Redelivery Bond
1. This is executed to the applicant and filed where the action is
pending
2. Amount is double the value of the property as stated in the
affidavit of the applicant
3. Conditions of the Bond:
a. The delivery thereof to the applicant, if such delivery be
adjudged, and
b. The payment of such sum to him as may be recovered
against the adverse party
SHERIFFS DUTY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WRIT
Duties of the Sheriff (Rule 60, Sec. 4)
1. Serve a copy of the order, together with the copies of the
application, the affidavit, and bond to the adverse party
2. Take the property:
When third party claims the property and such person makes affidavit
of his title thereto stating his grounds, and serves such affidavit upon
the sheriff while the latter has possession of the property and a copy
upon the applicant, the sheriff SHALL NOT BE BOUND to keep property
under replevin or deliver property to the applicant UNLESS the applicant
files a bond approved by the court in favor of the third person (the bond
should not be less than the value of stated under Sec. 60, Sec. 2; the
court shall determine the value in case of disagreement).
No claim for damages for the taking or keeping of the property may be
enforced against the bond UNLESS the action is filed within 120 days
from filing of the bond.
After trial of the issues, the court shall determine who has the right of
possession to and the value of the property and shall render judgment
in the alternative for the delivery thereof to the party entitled to the
same, or for its value in case delivery cannot be made, and also for
such damages as either party may prove, with costs.
PURPOSE
Preliminary Attachment
To have the property of adverse
party attached as security for
satisfaction of judgment that may
be recovered in cases falling
under Sec. 1, Rule 57
To enable the court to acquire
jurisdiction over the action by the
actual or constructive seizure of
the property in those instances
where personal service of
summons on creditor cannot be
effected
SUBJECT
MATTER
WHEN
APPLIED/
GRANTED
Preliminary Injunction
To require a party or a court,
agency, or a person to reframe
from doing a particular act/s
Receivership
Replevin
Particular act/s
At any stage prior to final
judgment or final order
Required
Not Required
May be issued ex parte
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
3.
residences of the
parties when action is
personal or by the
location of the
property when the
action is real
NATURE
Since a civil action in general is one by which a party sues another for
the enforcement of a right, or the prevention or redress of a wrong, a
special civil action is generally brought or filed for the same purpose.
[Riano]
Governed by ordinary
rules
Also governed by
ordinary rules but
subject to specific
rules prescribed
Formal demand of
ones legal rights in a
court of justice in the
manner prescribed by
the court or by the
law
Must be based on a
cause of action which
means that the
defendant has
violated plaintiffs
rights
Venue is determined
by either the
INTERPLEADER
NATURE
Definition - A remedy whereby a person who has property in his
possession or has an obligation to render wholly or partially, without
claiming any right in both, comes to court and asks that the defendants
who have made conflicting claims upon the same property or who
consider themselves entitled to demand compliance with the obligation
be required to litigate among themselves in order to determine who is
entitled to the property or payment or the obligation [Beltran v. PHHC,
(1969)]
The peculiar characteristic of an interpleader is that there is NO CAUSE
OF ACTION on the part of the plaintiff but only a threat of cause of
action.
Purposes
1. To compel conflicting claimants to interplead and litigate their
several claims among themselves. [Rule 62, Sec. 1]
2. To protect a person against double vexation in respect of one
liability [Beltran, supra]
REQUISITES FOR INTERPLEADER
1. The plaintiff clams no interest in the subject matter or his claim
thereto is not disputed
2. The parties to be interpleaded must make effective claims
3. There must be at least 2 or more conflicting claimants with
adverse or conflicting interests to a property in custody or
possession of the plaintiff; and
4. The subject matter must be one and the same
NOTE: Interpleader applies regardless of nature of subject matter.
Cannot be availed of to resolve the issue of breach of undertakings
made by defendants, which should be resolved in an ordinary action for
specific performance or other relief [Beltran, supra].
WHEN TO FILE
Who Files the Complaint - A complaint for interpleader is filed by the
person against whom the conflicting claims are made
7. After all pleadings have been fled, the court shall then determine
the respective rights and adjudicate their several claims (Sec. 6)
WHERE TO FILE
Characteristics
1. The concept of a cause of action is not applicable to declaratory
relief since this SCA presupposes that there has been no breach
or violation of the
2. instruments involved
3. Unlike other judgments, judgment in an action for declaratory
relief does not essentially entail any execution process
WHO MAY FILE THE ACTION (Rule 63, Sec. 1)
as
where
all
which would be
Basis: This new rule is based on the provisions of Art. IX-A, 1987
Constitution regarding the three constitutional commissions provided
for therein.
Rule 65
Directed to any tribunal, board, or
officer exercising judicial or quasijudicial functions
Filed within 60 days from notice
of the judgment
PROHIBITION
Directed
against an
entity or
person
exercising
judicial, quasijudicial, or
ministerial
functions
PURPOSE
To annul or
nullify a
PURPOSE:
To have
respondent
MANDAMUS
Directed
against an
entity or
person
exercising
ministerial
functions
Entity or
person is
alleged to
have:
(1) Neglected
a ministerial
duty; or
(2) Excluded
another from
a
right
or
office
PURPOSE:
For
respondent
proceeding
Covers
discretionary
acts
Corrective
remedy
To correct
usurpation of
jurisdiction
desist from
further
proceeding
Covers
discretionary
and
ministerial
acts
Negative and
Preventive
remedy
To restrain or
prevent the
said
usurpation
This remedy
is affirmative
or positive
or negative
PROHIBITION
Special civil action
Directed to the court
itself, commanding it
to cease from the
exercise of a
jurisdiction to which it
has no legal claim
MANDAMUS
Special civil action
Directed against a
tribunal, corporation,
board, or officer
Purpose is for the
tribunal, corporation,
board, or officer, to
perform a ministerial
and legal duty
CERTIORARI AS A
MODE OF APPEAL
(Rule 45)
A continuation of the
appellate process
over the original case
Requisites of Certiorari:
1. There must be a controversy
2. Respondent is exercising judicial or quasi-judicial function
3. Respondent acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction or acted
with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction;
and
4. There must be no appeal or other plain, speedy, and adequate
remedy
Requisites of Prohibition:
1. There must be a controversy
2. Respondent is exercising judicial, quasi-judicial, or ministerial
functions
3. Respondent acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction or acted
with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction;
and
4. There must be no appeal or other plain, speedy, and adequate
remedy
Requisites of Mandamus:
1. There must be a clear legal right or duty
If there is discretion as to the taking or non-taking of the
action sought, there is no clear legal duty, and mandamus
will not lie
2. The act to be performed must be practical
Within the powers of the respondent to perform such that if
the writ of mandamus was issued, he can comply with it, or
else the essence will be defeated
3. Respondent must be exercising a ministerial duty
A duty which is absolute and imperative and involves merely
its execution
4. The duty or act to be performed must be existing
A correlative right will be denied if not performed by the
respondents
5. There is no other plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the
ordinary course of law
DISCRETIONARY ACT
One where public
functionaries, by
virtue of a power or
right conferred upon
them by law, can act
MINISTERIAL ACT
One which an officer
or tribunal performs in
a given state of facts,
in a prescribed
manner, in obedience
to the mandate of a
legal authority,
without regard to or
the exercise of his own
judgment upon the
propriety or
impropriety of the act
done
General Rule: Prohibition does NOT ordinarily lie to restrain an act which
is already fait accompli.
Exception: Writ of prohibition will lie to prevent the unlawful creation of
a new province by those in the corridors of power who could avoid
judicial intervention and review by merely speedily and stealthily
completing the commission of such illegality (Tan, et al. v. COMELEC)
WHEN PETITION FOR MANDAMUS PROPER
Prayers:
1. In certiorari
a. That the judgment be rendered annulling or modifying the
proceedings of such tribunal, board or officer; and
b. Granting such incidental reliefs as law and justice may
require
2. In prohibition
a. That the judgment be rendered commanding the respondent
to desist from further proceedings in the action or matter
specified; or
b. Otherwise granting such incidental reliefs as law and justice
may require
3. In mandamus
a. That the judgment be rendered commanding the respondent,
immediately or at some other time to be specified by the
court, to do the act required to be done to protect the rights
of the petitioner ; and
b. To pay the damages sustained by the petitioner by reason of
the wrongful acts of the respondent
EXCEPTIONS TO FILING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION BEFORE
FILING PETITION
General Rule: A MR is an essential precondition for the filing of a
petition for certiorari, prohibition, or mandamus. It is a plain, speedy,
and adequate remedy. This is to enable the lower court, in the first
instance, to pass upon and correct its mistakes without the intervention
of the higher court
If a MR is filed, the period shall not only be interrupted but another 60
days shall be given to the petitioner within which to file the appropriate
petition for certiorari or prohibition with the superior court (SC Admin
Circular 00-2-03)
Exceptions: MR may be dispensed with in some cases:
1. Where the order is a patent nullity
2. Where questions raised in the certiorari proceeding have been
duly raised and passed upon by the lower court , or are the same
as those raised and passed upon in the lower court
3. Where there is urgent necessity for the resolution of the question
and any further delay would prejudice the interests of the
Government
QUO WARRANTO
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Rule 65, Sec. 7 provides for the issuance of a temporary restraining
order, and not only for a writ of preliminary injunction, but such order
shall be subject to the rules on the grounds and duration thereof.
[Regalado]
General Rule: The petition shall not interrupt the course of the principal
case.
The public respondent shall proceed with the principal case WITHIN 10
DAYS from filing of the petition for certiorari with the higher court,
absent a TRO or preliminary injunction, or upon its expiration. Failure
may be a ground for an administrative charge (AM No. 07-7-12-SC)
Exception: Unless a TRO or preliminary injunction has been issued
against the public respondent from further proceedings in the case
FACTS/OMISSIONS OF MTC/RTC IN ELECTION CASES
In election cases involving an act or an omission of a municipal or
regional trial court, the petition shall be filed EXCLUSIVELY with the
Commission on Elections, in aid of its appellate jurisdiction (Rule 65,
Sec. 4, as amended in AM No. 07-7-12-SC)
EFFECTS OF FILING AN UNMERITORIOUS PETITION
The court, however, may dismiss the petition if it finds the same to be
patently without merit, prosecuted manifestly for delay, or that the
questions raised therein are too unsubstantial to require consideration.
(Rule 65, Sec. 8)
In these cases, the court may award TREBLE COSTS solidarily against
petitioner and counsel, in addition to administrative sanctions
Court may impose, motu proprio, based on res ipsa loquitur, other
disciplinary sanctions for patently dilatory and unmeritorious petitions
(AM No. 07-7-12-SC)
NATURE
FROM
QUO
WARRANTO
IN
THE
OMNIBUS
ROC Rule 66
EXPROPRIATION
NATURE
Eminent Domain is the right and authority of the State, as sovereign, to
take private property for public use upon observance of due process
and payment of just compensation.
It is a governments right to appropriate, in the nature of a compulsory
sale to the State, private property for public use or purpose.
Requisites for the Valid Exercise of the Right
1. There must be due process of law
2. Payment of just compensation
3. Taking must be for public use
Subject Matter of Expropriation: All properties can be expropriated,
EXCEPT:
1. Money (futile; because of just compensation)
2. Choses in action (conjectural in nature; validity and its value)
When is Expropriation Proper:
1. When the owner refuses to sell
2. When he agrees to sell but an agreement as to the price cannot
be reached.
MATTERS TO ALLEGE IN COMPLAINT FOR EXPROPRIATION
Contents of the Complaint (Rule 67, Sec. 1)
1. State with certainty the right and purpose of expropriation
a. Where the right of the plaintiff to expropriate is conferred by
law, complaint does not have to state with certainty the right
of expropriation (MRR Co. v. Mitchel)
2. Describe the real or personal property sought to be expropriated
3. Joining of defendants
a. All persons owning or claiming to own, or occupying, any part
thereof or interest therein. showing separate interest of each
defendant, as far as practicable
b. Make the following averments, if needed:
(1) If title appears to be in the Republic, although occupied
by private individuals
(2) If title is otherwise obscure or doubtful so that plaintiff
cannot with accuracy or certainty specify who the real
owners are
Value
Where
Advance
payment
for
just
compensation, if property is finally
expropriated
If Real Property - Equivalent to the
assessed value of the property for
purposes of taxation
If Personal Property Value shall be
provisionally ascertained and fixed by
the court
With the authorized government
to
deposit
Form of
Deposit
depositary
Amount is to be held by such bank
subject to the orders of the court
Deposit shall be in money
UNLESS, in lieu of money, court
authorizes deposit of a certificate of
deposit of a government bank of the
Republic, payable on demand to the
authorized government depositary
After the deposit, court shall order sheriff or proper officer to place
plaintiff in possession of the property. Such officer shall promptly submit
a report to the court with service of copies to parties.
NOTE: Preliminary deposit is only necessary if the plaintiff desires entry
on the land upon its institution of the action. Otherwise, he could always
wait until the order of expropriation is issued before it enters upon the
land.
Once the preliminary deposit has been made, the expropriator is
entitled to a writ of possession as a matter of right, and the issuance of
said writ becomes ministerial on the part of the trial court (Biglang-Awa
v. Bacalla)
FOR WRIT OF
POSSESSION
AMOUNT OF
PAYMENT OR
DEPOSIT
Equal to
assessed
value of
real
property for
purposes of
taxation
Expropriati
on in
general
Governmen
t is
RA 8974
Only when
national
government
expropriates
property for
national
government
infrastructure
projects
Government is
required to make
immediate
payment to owner
upon filing of
complaint
Equal to the
market value of
the property as
stated in the tax
declaration or
current relevant
zonal value of BIR,
whichever is
higher, and value
of improvements
and/or structures
using replacement
cost method
On RA 8974
APPLICATION
TO ISSUE
required to
make
preliminary
deposit
IMMEDIATE
PAYMENT
OF
INITIAL
JUST
Period to file
Time stated in the summons
Contents
Specifically
designating/identifying the
Manifestation to the effect that
property in which he claims to
he has no objection or defense;
have an interest in and the
nature and extent of the
Specifically
interest;
designating/identifying the
property in which he claims to be
ALL his objections and defenses
interested
to the complaint or any
allegation therein
Prohibited
the
right
of
plaintiff
to
Just Compensation
Just Compensation has been defined as the full and fair equivalent of
the property taken from its owner by the expropriator. Just
compensation means not only the correct determination of the amount
to be paid but also the payment of the land within a reasonable time
from its taking.
Market Value
Commissioners shall make a full and accurate report to the court of all
their proceedings.
Such proceeding shall not be effectual until court has accepted their
report
and
rendered
judgment
in
accordance
with
their
recommendations.
Report shall be filed within 60 days from date commissioners were
notified of their appointment. Time may be extended by court
discretion,
Upon filing, clerk shall serve copies of the Commissioners Report to all
interested parties. Clerk includes a notice that parties are allowed to file
objections to the report within 10 days from notice
Action Upon Commissioners Report (Rule 67, Sec. 8)
1. When court renders judgment: Upon
a. Filing of objections to the report or of the agreement thereon
of all interested parties; or
b. Expiration of 10-day period to object from the report
2. Court may:
a. After hearing, accept the report and render judgment in
accordance therewith
b. Recommit to commissioners for further report of facts, for
cause shown
c. Set aside the report and appoint new commissioners;
d. Accept the report in part and reject in part
e. Make such order or render such judgment as shall secure the
plaintiff and the defendant
RIGHTS OF PLAINTIFF UPON JUDGMENT AND PAYMENT (Rule 67,
Sec. 10)
CANNOT
JUDICIAL
FORECLOSURE
Requires court
intervention
There is only an
equity of redemption
Governed by Rule 68
There could be a
Deficiency Judgment
Recovery of
deficiency can be
done by mere
motion
EXTRAJUDICIAL
FORECLOSURE
No court intervention
necessary
Right of redemption
exists
Governed by Act 3135
No Deficiency
judgment because
there is no judicial
proceeding but
recovery of deficiency
is allowed
Recovery of deficiency
is through an
independent action
RIGHT OF
REDEMPTION
Right of the debtor, his
successor in interest,
or any judicial creditor
of said debtor or any
person having a lien
on the property
subsequent to the
mortgage or deed of
EXCEPT: Those
granted by banks or
banking institutions as
provided by the
General Banking Act
(mortgagor may
exercise a right of
redemption)
PARTITION
NATURE
Period is 1 year from
date of registration of
certificate of sale
Governed by Sec. 2931, Rule 39
EXTRAJUDICIAL
FORECLOSURE
Mortgagor has a right
to redeem the
property within one
year from registration
of the deed of sale
EXCEPT: Sec. 47 of the
General Banking Act
provides that in case
of extrajudicial
foreclosure, juridical
persons shall have the
right to redeem until,
but not after, the
registration of the
certificate of
foreclosure sale with
the Register of Deeds
which in no case shall
be more than 3
months after
foreclosure, whichever
is earlier
WHO
SHOULD
BE
MADE
Who May File: A person having the right to compel partition of real
estate, or of personal property, or both real and personal property (Sec.
1, Sec. 13)
When there was a prior partition, the fact that the share of each co-heir
has not been technically described and the title over the whole lot
remains uncancelled does not negate such partition.
Venue: An action for partition should be filed in the RTC of the province
where the property or part thereof is situated.
Parties
1. The plaintiff is the person who is supposed to be a co-owner of
the property
2. Defendants are all the co-owners, who are indispensable parties
3. Creditors or assignees of co-owners may also intervene and
object to the partition
MATTERS TO ALLEGE IN THE COMPLAINT FOR PARTITION
Contents of the Complaint:
1. Nature and extent of his title
2. Adequate description of the real estate sought to be partitioned
3. Joining of Defendants All other persons interested in the
property
TWO STAGES IN EVERY ACTION FOR PARTITION
First Stage: Determination of the propriety of partition
This involves a determination of whether the subject property is owned
in common and whether all the co-owners are made parties in the case.
The order may also require an accounting of rents and profits recovered
by the defendant. This order of partition is appealable. [Miranda v.
Court of Appeals (1976)]
PARTITION
BY
COMMISSIONERS;
APPOINTMENT
OF
COMMISSIONERS; COMMISSIONERS REPORT; COURT ACTION
UPON COMMISSIONERS REPORT
If not appealed, then the parties may partition the common property in
the way they want. If they cannot agree, then the case goes into the
second stage. However, the order of accounting may in the meantime
be executed. [De Mesa v. CA (1994)]
How Done: The court appoints not more than 3 competent and
disinterested commissioners to make the partition. (Sec. 3)
Effects of Judgment
NATURE
PRESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The right of action to demand partition does not prescribe [De Castro v.
Echarri (1911)], EXCEPT where one of the interested parties openly and
adversely occupies the property without recognizing the co-ownership
[Cordova v. Cordova (1958)] in which case, acquisitive prescription may
set in.
If a co-owner repudiates the co-ownership and makes known such
repudiation to the other co-owners, then partition is no longer a proper
remedy of the aggrieved co-owner. He should file an accion
reivindicatoria, which is prescriptible. [Roque v. IAC (1988)]
UNLAFUL DETAINER
(Desahucio)
Possession is
inceptively lawful but
it becomes illegal by
reason of the
termination of his right
to possession of the
property under his
contract with the
plaintiff
Demand is
jurisdictional if the
ground is nonpayment of rentals or
failure to comply with
lease contract
Plaintiff need not have
been in prior physical
possession
Period is counted from
the date of last letter
of demand
The issue centers on
whether the
defendants right to
possess has expired or
not.
DISTINGUISHED
FROM
ACCION
PUBLICIANA,
REINVINDICATORIA, ACCION INTERDICTAL
The Three Kinds of Action for Recovery of Possession
ACCION
INTERDICTAL
ACCION
PUBLICIANA
ACCION
REINVINDICATOR
IA
Summary
action for
recovery of
physical
possession
where the
dispossession
has not lasted
for more than
1 year
A plenary
action for
recovery of
real right of
possession
when
dispossessi
on has
lasted for
more than
one year
An action for
recovery of
ownership, which
necessarily
includes the
recovery of
possession
All cases of
forcible entry
and unlawful
detainer,
irrespective of
the amount of
damages or
unpaid
rentals
sought to be
recovered
should be
brought to
the MTC.
However, if
not brought
within 1 year,
RTC has
jurisdiction
NOTE: Amount of rents and damages claimed does not affect the
jurisdiction of the MTC because they are only incidental or
accessory to the main action
HOWEVER, municipal courts have no jurisdiction over a FEUD case
involving agricultural tenants. Jurisdiction is with the HLURB
In accion publiciana and accion reinvindicatoria:
1. RTC has jurisdiction where the assessed value of the property
exceeds P20K or, in MM, P50k
2. MTC has jurisdiction if the assessed value does not exceed said
amounts
WHO MAY INSTITUTE THE ACTION AND WHEN; AGAINST WHOM
MAINTAINED
Who May Institute Proceedings (Rule 70, Sec. 1)
1. In Forcible Entry:
a. A person deprived of possession of any land or building by
force, intimidation, strategy, threat, or stealth (FISTS)
2. In Unlawful Detainer:
a. Lessor, vendor, vendee or other person against whom any
land or building is unlawfully withheld
b. Or their legal representatives or assigns
Period of Filing: Within ONE (1) year after such unlawful deprivation or
withholding of possession. Reckoning points:
1. For forcible entry, it is counted from date of entry or taking of
possession
2. For unlawful detainer, it is counted from:
a. Date of last demand to vacate in case of non-payment of rent
or non-compliance with conditions of the lease
b. Date of notice to quit, in case of tacit renewal of lease
c. Date of revocation of the permit in case of occupancy on
mere tolerance or under temporary permit
INJUNCTION
AND
PRELIMINARY
MANDATORY
How done: Possessor may present a motion in the action for issuance of
preliminary mandatory injunction within 5 days from filing of complaint
to restore him in his possession. Court shall decide the motion within 30
days from filing.
Prohibited Pleadings:
1. THIRD-party complaints
2. REPLY
3. INTERVENTIONS
4. PETITION for relief from judgment
5. PETITION for certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition against any
interlocutory order issued by the court
CONTEMPT
NATURE
Contempt of Court is disobedience to the court by acting in opposition
to its authority, justice, and dignity. It signifies not only a willful
disregard of disobedience to the courts orders but also conduct tending
to bring the authority of the court and administration of law into
disrepute, or, in some manner, to impede the due administration of
justice.
The power to declare person in contempt of court and in dealing with
him accordingly is an INHERENT power of the court. It is used as a
means to protect and preserve the dignity of the court, the solemnity of
the proceedings, and administration of justice.
KINDS OF CONTEMPT; PURPOSE AND NATURE OF EACH
According to Nature
1. CRIMINAL CONTEMPT conduct directed against the authority
and dignity of the court or a judge acting judicially
2. CIVIL CONTEMPT failure to do something ordered to be done by
a court or by a judge for the benefit of the opposing party
CRIMINAL CONTEMPT
Punitive in nature
Purpose is to preserve
the courts authority
and to punish for
disobedience of its
orders
Intent is necessary
State is the real
prosecutor
Proof required is proof
beyond reasonable
doubt
CIVIL CONTEMPT
Remedial in nature
Purpose is to provide a
remedy for an injured
suitor and to coerce
compliance with an
order; for the
preservation of the
rights of private
persons
Intent is not necessary
Instituted by the
aggrieved party, or his
successor, or someone
who has a pecuniary
interest in the right to
be protected
Proof required is more
than mere
preponderance
If accused is
acquitted, there can
be no appeal
If judgment is for
respondent, there can
be appeal
INDIRECT CONTEMPT
Not committed within
the presence of the
court
There is charge and
hearing
Punishment:
If committed against
RTC: Fine not
exceeding P30,000
and/or imprisonment
not exceeding 6
months
If committed against
MTC: Fine not
exceeding P5,000
and/or imprisonment
not exceeding 1 month
Remedy is appeal
Otherwise known as
Constructive Contempt
DIRECT CONTEMPT
For a person to be adjudged guilty of direct contempt, he must commit
a misbehavior in the presence of or so near a judge as to interrupt the
administration of justice
Grounds for Direct Contempt (Rule 71, Sec. 1)
1. DISRESPECT toward the court;
2. OFFENSIVE personalities toward others
3. REFUSAL to be sworn or answer as witness or subscribe an
affidavit when lawfully required to do so
4. MISBEHAVIOR in the presence of or so near a court as to
obstruct or interrupt the proceedings
5. When the counsel WILLFULLY and deliberately engages in forum
shopping
Procedure: Summarily adjudged in contempt by such court
By whom initiated:
1. Generally, civil contempt proceedings should be instituted by an
aggrieved party, or his successor, or someone who has
pecuniary interest in the right to be protected
2. In criminal contempt proceedings, it is generally held that the
State is the real prosecutor
Penalties:
OFFENSE
If RTC or a court of
equivalent or higher
rank
If lower court:
PENALTY
Fine not exceeding
P2,000 and/or
Imprisonment not
exceeding 10 days
Fine not exceeding
P200 and/or
Imprisonment not
exceeding 1 day
INDIRECT CONTEMPT
Specific acts constituting indirect contempt (Rule 70, Sec. 3)
1. MISBEHAVIOR of an officer of a court in the performance of his
official duties or in his official transactions
2. ABUSE of or any unlawful interference with processes or
proceedings of a court not constituting direct contempt
3. DISOBEDIENCE or resistance to lawful writ, process, order, or
judgment of a court, or any unlawful intrusion to any real
property after being ejected
4. FAILURE to obey subpoena duly served
5. ASSUMING to be an attorney or officer of a court, and acting as
such without authority
6. IMPROPER conduct tending to impede, obstruct, or degrade
administration of justice
7. RESCUE, or attempted rescue, of a person or property in custody
of an officer
8. Failure by COUNSEL to inform the court of the death of his client
Procedural requisites for indirect contempt proceedings:
1. A charge in writing or an order of the court to appear and explain
2. An opportunity for respondent to comment on the charge and to
appear and explain his conduct
Two modes of commencing a proceeding for indirect contempt (Rule 70,
Sec. 4)
1. Motu proprio by the court against which contempt was
committed
a. By order or any other formal charge requiring respondent to
show why he should not be punished for contempt
2. Independent action in all other cases
a. By a charge commenced by a verified petition with
supporting particulars
Where Charge is to be Filed (Rule 70, Sec. 5)
1. General rule: Proceeding for Indirect Contempt shall be filed and
tried by the court against which the contumacious conduct was
committed.
2. Exceptions:
If contempt
consists in
violation of a writ
of injunction, TRO,
or status quo
order
If committed
against a person
or entity
exercising quasijudicial functions
PENALTY
Fine not exceeding P30,000
and/or
Imprisonment not
exceeding 6 months
Fine not exceeding P500,
and/or
Imprisonment not
exceeding 1 month
Offender may also be
ordered to make complete
restitution to the party
injured by such violation of
the property involved or
such amount as may be
alleged and proved.
If there is nothing more to
return, offender is
personally liable for the
restitution of the money
equivalent to the lost thing
(Rosario Textile Mills v. CA)
Penalty shall depend upon
the provisions of the law
which authorizes penalty for
contempt against such
persons or entities
Real Property
1. MTC assessed value not more than P20,000 outside Metro
Manila or not more than P50,000 in Metro Manila (Sec. 33,
BP 129)
2. RTC value exceeds P20,000 if outside Metro Manila, or
P50,000 if in Metro Manila, or incapable of pecuniary
estimation (Sec. 19, BP129)
VENUE
Rule 4 applies
If the action affects title to or possession of real property
Venue is where the real property involved or a portion thereof is situated
All other actionsAt the election of the plaintiff
1. Where plaintiff or any of the principal plaintiffs reside; or
2. Where defendant or any of the principal defendants resides; or
3. In case of an non-resident, where he may be found
Rule 4 applies
GENERAL RULE: In the appropriate RTC
DECLARATORY
RELIEF
REVIEW OF
JUDGMENTS AND
FINAL ORDERS OF
COMELEC/COA
With the SC
Via Special Civil Action of Certiorari
CERTIORARI
PROHIBITION
MANDAMUS
RTC where the respondent is situated, where petition relates to an act or omission of a
corporation, board, an officer, or person
(Rule 65, Sec. 4)
QUO WARRANTO
RTC, CA, SC
Sandiganbayan (exclusive original jurisdiction over quo warranto
cases filed by the PCGG)
COMELEC (exclusive jurisdiction over cases falling under the OEC)
SEC for quo warranto against duly licensed association (Corp Code
rules apply, not the ROC)
EXPROPRIATION
JUDICIAL
FORECLOSURE
Action can be brought in: The SC, CA, or RTC exercising jurisdiction over the territorial area
where respondent resides or any of the respondent resides
If commenced by the SolGen, it may be filed with: RTC Manila, CA, or SC
File in the SEC (following the Corp Code):If petition for quo warranto is against a
corporation or against persons who usurp an office in a corporation
Where the real property involved, or a portion thereof, is situated
PARTITION
FORCIBLE ENTRY
AND UNALWFUL
DETAINER
CONTEMPT
If committed against a lower court. File with the RTC of the place in which lower court is
sitting
If act was committed against persons or entities exercising quasi-judicial functions: File
with the RTC of the place wherein contempt was committed
SPECIAL RULES
REVISED RULES ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE
CASES COVERED BY THE RULE (Sec. 1)
Rule shall govern the summary procedure in the MTC, MTC in Cities,
MCTC in the following cases falling within their jurisdiction:
For Civil Cases:
1. Cases of forcible entry and unlawful detainer
a. Irrespective of the amount of damages or unpaid rentals
sought to be recovered
b. Where attorneys fees are awarded, it shall not exceed
P20,000
2. All other civil cases where total amount of plaintiffs claim does
not exceed P100,000 or P200,000 in Metropolitan Manila,
exclusive of interest and costs
a. EXCEPT: probate proceedings
For Criminal Cases
1. Traffic laws, rules, and regulations violation
2. Rental law violations
3. Municipal or city ordinance violations
4. All other criminal cases where penalty prescribed by law for
offense charged is imprisonment not exceeding 6 months and/or
a fine not exceeding P1,000
a. Irrespective of other imposable penalties, accessory or
otherwise, or of civil liability arising therefrom
b. In offenses involving damage to property through criminal
negligence, this rule shall govern where imposable fine does
not exceed P10,000
Rule shall not apply:
PARTIES
A preliminary conference shall be held not later than 30 days after the
last answer is filed.
Rules on pre-trial in ordinary cases shall be applicable unless
inconsistent with the provisions of this Rule
Failure of plaintiff to appear in preliminary conference
1. Cause for dismissal of complaint
2. Defendant who appears in the absence of plaintiff shall be
entitled to judgment on his counterclaim in accordance with Sec.
6
3. All cross-claims shall be dismissed
If sole defendant shall fail to appear
1. Plaintiff entitled to judgment in accordance with Sec. 6
LUPON
Lupon of said
barangay
Lupon of the barangay
where the respondent
or any of the
respondents actually
resides at the option of
complainant
Lupon of barangay
were the real property
or the larger portion
thereof is located
Lupon of the barangay
were the workplace or
institution is located
EXECUTION
The amicable settlement or arbitration award may be enforced by
execution by the lupon within six (6) months from the date of the
settlement. After the lapse of such time, the settlement may be
enforced by action in the appropriate city or municipal court. (Sec. 417,
RA 7160)
REPUDIATION
Any party to the dispute may, within ten (10) days from the date of the
settlement, repudiate the same by filing with the lupon chairman a
statement to that effect sworn to before him, where the consent is
vitiated by fraud, violence, or intimidation. Such repudiation shall be
sufficient basis for the issuance of the certification for filing a complaint
as hereinabove provided. (Sec. 418, RA 7160)
Should the defendant fail to file his response within the required period,
the court by itself shall render judgment as may be warranted by the
facts alleged in the Statement of claim limited to what is prayed for. The
court however, may, in its discretion, reduce the amount of damages for
being excessive or unconscionable. (Sec. 12)
6. Memoranda;
7. Petition for certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition against any
interlocutory order issued by the court;
8. Motion to declare the defendant in default;
9. Dilatory motions for postponement;
10. Reply;
11. Third-party complaints; and
12. Interventions.
APPEARANCES
FINALITY OF JUDGMENT
After the hearing, the court shall render its decision on the same day,
based on the facts established by the evidence.
In other courts,
1. One original (properly marked)
2. With the stated annexes attached to it.
In the event a party requests a set of the annexes actually filed with the
court, the part who filed the paper shall comply with the request within
five days from receipt.
APPLICABILITY
This Rule applies to all courts and quasi-judicial bodies under the
administrative supervision of the Supreme Court.
END OF CIVPRO!!!