‘The author of | wove (yyptal \Niteaman-Mige Peer Review of Essay #4 AUTHOR: Answer these questions before handing your paper to your peer review partners. 1. What for you was the most frustrating par of producing tis af? CUP RoMeRANG My OPpEsinoy ROIG. 2. What was the best par lWp\ jing ‘PEXSONCLL opinions & experencesd a So - vitae Wine pele edback would Youth resis on you peer review rou saat Toe Input See ae reduahon, (F100 Muck Hew does trie OGay Maye y feats Directions: First, read the paper silently to yourself once. Then, answer the questions below. Tite 1, Does the ttle grab your interest? Does it suggest the essay’s content? If there is nota title yet, ean you offer a ood suggestion? ec, Introduction 1. Does the introduction effectively introduce the essay’s topic FLAT ivrtraduction \ UGE ITU 2. Highlight the claimfhesis statement. 3. ie the thesis statment ety he tpi and tate a postion? es Body Paragraphs ‘Underline the topie sentence in each body paragraph. Hii each sors use inte ex. Aes sors Tied on he Wks Cad nage vg S hatin med fer drolnment yayy Polat dive Wed! OXpvad od AFF ehenk Soumes ‘Are there points thatthe author did not consider but should inorder to strengthen the argument? "¥'S Q.aVidct ate ‘What isthe single piece of evidence that most convinces you thatthe author is comect? The Stories OF 2ueh ch e sett a ‘Wherein the eso tre you last convinced bythe authors argument o point? Why? ews aduconata stot PoP ‘What words/phrases does the writer use to connect ideas‘reasons? Also, besides, furthermore, in addition," similarly, in ether words, for example for instance, although, but, despite the fact that, however, as a result ‘ince, 50, therefore, admitedly, consequently, yet, frst, second, finally? 9, Note any piace that need a transition or hasan inappropriate or ineffective one Opposing Viewpoints 1, Highlight the counterarguments. 2. Does the author adequately refute each opposing viewpoint? How persuasively? Conclusion 1. Does the conclusion provide closure and offer an interesting final insight that helps you to understand the significance of the experience? How could the writer make it more effective? Works Cited 1, Circle ALL in-text citations. 2. Does the author follow every quotation, paraphrase, and summary with an in-text citation?” Overall |, Having read the rest ofthe draft, did you find that the introduction gave you a good idea of what the author actually will address in the rest ofthe paper? If not, what is the main point that the author seems to be making? 2, Are there any points ofthe argument that don't seem to fit- where the author seems to go off on a tangent? Ate there any points that don' really seem relevant to the discussion at hand? 3. What single change would make the most improvement in this essay?