Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Handy Hints For Variography PDF
Handy Hints For Variography PDF
Jacqui Coombes1
ABSTRACT
The intention of this paper is to provide the user with a few essential and
handy hints for variogram analysis. So often one is faced with the task of
analysing the spatial continuity of a data set or with the task of generating a
resource model using geostatistical techniques.
However, practical
guidelines for completing these tasks are few and far between and, even
though one may attend a geostatistics course, time lapses between exposure
to geostatistical techniques and actual application of the techniques to real
situations is generally large enough for the handy hints of variography to be
lost in the never-never land of memories.
1.0
1.1
1.2
Page 2
1.3
DOMAINING DEFINITION
If the data is interpolated using the high nugget effect, the resource model is
over-smoothed. If the data is simulated using the high nugget effect, the
simulation model is too erratic.
1.4
Page 3
It is important that the correct variogram is selected for analysing the spatial
behaviour of mineralisation. By selecting an ordinary (absolute) variogram to
analyse the spatial behaviour, one is inherently assuming that the data
follows a normal distribution.
Very seldom does one encounter a normal distribution in the iron ore industry.
The statistical distribution of iron tends to be negatively skewed, whilst the
contaminants tend to have positively skewed distributions (Figure 1).
This
skewed distribution.
Page 4
Frequency
Fe grades
Frequency
Contaminant values
Page 5
Frequency
Grade Values
Figure 2: Calculating the variance when the data distribution is negatively
skew
Other variogram tools which account for the skewness of the data distribution
include the pairwise and general relative variograms. These two variogram
types are especially useful when the data density is low and the underlying
data distribution is positively skewed (Journel and Deutsch, 1992).
1.5
Page 6
In
Probability Distribution
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
50
2500
Frequency
2000
1500
1000
500
0
10
20
30
Grade
High Variance
40
Low Variance
Figure 3: Probability distributions with high and low variances (small and large
sample volumes respectively)
It is more appropriate to
Page 7
Drillhole A
raw sample grades
22%
68%
Drillhole A
composited to
minimum length
22%
22%
68%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
False measure of
good continuity will
affect the nugget effect
and short range structures
10%
10%
67%
67%
33%
33%
33%
1.6
CORRELATED DATA
Page 8
Cross
2.0
This
2.1
The lag spacing defines the incremental distance at which the variogram is
calculated. The first point to note is that the lag distance should be at least
equal to the sample spacing.
variogram at a lag of 10m when the sample spacing is 15m will only provide
variogram information at every second lag. Similarly, calculating a variogram
with a lag of 10m when the drilling pattern is a 25m x 25m pattern will result in
variograms at intermediate lags being based on relatively low numbers of
sample pairs. The resulting variograms are usually erratic and difficult to
interpret.
It is wise to visualise the number of sample pairs for each variogram point and
opt for a lag spacing which provides gradual changes in sample pair support
for the variogram values.
2.2
Page 9
2.3
The selection of the angular tolerance is also subject to the data density. It
may be that the data available is insufficient to describe the variability and
that a wider tolerance better reflects the spatial continuity. In such a situation
it may be wise to model the spatial variance proportions of the variogram with
a wide angular tolerance and then to infer the ranges of continuity with the
assistance of geological understanding.
3.0
Modelling variograms can be one of the most daunting tasks facing the
novice.
Page 10
NORTH
STRIKE
True Anisotropy
WEST
EAST
SOUTH
Figure 5: Effect of tolerance angle on anisotropy
3.1
The nugget effect is best based on the closest spaced data, usually the
downhole direction.
The nugget effect also manifests itself in duplicate data analysis. Analysis of
sample integrity can assist one in understanding and modelling the inherent
nugget effect for the variogram of the element under investigation.
3.2
NESTING STRUCTURES
Page 11
4.0
INTERPRETING VARIOGRAMS
By interpreting the
nugget effect, the proportion of spatial variability and the ranges of influence,
one is able to assess whether current drill spacing adequately describes the
mineralisation continuity or whether further drilling is required. Based on a
model of the variogram one can determine the drill spacing required to
improve the definition of the iron or contaminant models.
Page 12
(h)
TREND
X
semivariogram
X
X
X
X
Theoretical Sill
X
X
X
X
lag
semivariogram
(h)
HOLE EFFECT
X
X
X
Theoretical Sill
X
X
X
X
X
lag
Page 13
5.0
5.1
VARIOGRAM FANS
5.2
3D VARIOGRAM MODELLING
maximum continuity (say the strike) off the horizontal variogram fan, one is
able to model the strike variogram using a rubber-banding approach. This
model is then applied to the variogram fan as a series of ellipses and the
difference between actual and modelled fan contour is updated. The ellipses
can then be rubber-banded until the difference map shows no remaining
patterns of spatial continuity. Variograms in any directions can be selected
and the models in those directions re-evaluated whilst updating the difference
map. This process can be repeated for any plane until the user approves of
the resulting 3D ellipsoid modelled variogram.
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Acknowledgments:
The author would like to thank Vivienne Snowden, Christine Standing and
Gordon Thomas of Snowden Associates for their useful comments and
suggestions.
References: