Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Amcp 706 252 PDF
Amcp 706 252 PDF
com
AMCP 106-252
AMC PAMPHLET
HANDBOOK
ENGINEERING DESIGN
GUNS SERIES
GUN TUBES
os t.:'
'.
, .
#2 UNCIJSSIF IED
STANT~
.
to foreioe
nub-.-tt]"
i
S..
oument
S subject
to special
export
ldo(
"Thi
goVern1Cnts
or for-1cn
HEADQUARTERS, U.
onalS
lot:
nay be xade
my
baterie
o:warshingYton atC,
FEBRUARY 1964
/13
......
if-Ja....
t:
t|nla
4nAftindmiental
data to
supplement experience in assisting engineers in the evolution of new designs which will meet tacticsl and technical
needs while also embodying satisfactory producibility and maintainability.
Listed below are the Handbooks which have been published or submitted for publication. Handbooks with publication dates prior to I August 1962 were published as 20-series Ordnance Corps pamphlets. AMC Circular W0-"8. 19
RODP 20-138 was redesignated AMCP
July 1963, redesignated those publications as 706-series AMC pamphlets (i.e.,
706-138). All new, reprinted, or revised Handbooks are being published as 706-series AMC pamphlets.
General and Miscellaneous Subjects
Number
106
107
108
110
ill
lIZ
113
114
134
135
136
137
138
139
170(C)
252
270
290(C)
331
355
Title
Elements of Armament Engineering, Part One,
Sources of Energy
Elements of Armament Engineering, Part Two,
Ballistics
Elements of Armament Engineering, Part Three.,
Weapon Systems and Components
Experimental Statistics, Section 1, Basic Concept@ and Analysis of Measurement Data
Experimental Statistics, Section 2, Analysis of
Enumerative and Classificatory Data
Experimental Statistics, Section 3, Planningand
Aralysis of Comparative Experiments
Experimental Statistics, Section 4, Special
Topics
Experimental Slatistics, Section 5, Tables
Maintenance Engineering Guide for Ordnance
Design
Inventions, Patents, and Related Matters
Servomechanisms, Section 1, Theory
Servomechanisms, Section 3r Measurement
and Signal Converters
^...,p
Servomechanisms, Sectior,
1 ification
Servomechanisms, Section 4. Power Elements
and System Design
Armor and Its Application to Vehicles (U)
Gun Tubes (Guns Series)
Propellant Actuated Devices
Warheads--General (U)
Compensating Elements (Fire Control Series)
The Automotive Assembly (Automotive Series)
"214(S)
245(C)
246
"247(C)
248
249(C)
L,
Title
Weapon System Effectivcness (U)
Propulsion and Propellants
Trajectories (U)
Structures
Ballistics Series
140
Trajectories, Differential Effects, and
Data for Projectiles
160(s)
Elements of Terminal Ballistics, Part
One, Introduction, Kill Mechanisms,
and Vulnerability (U)
161(5)
Elaments of Terminal Ballistics, Part
Two, Collection and Analysis of Data
Concerning Targets (U)
16Z(S-RD)
Elements of Terminal Ballistics, Part
Three, Application to Missile and
Space Targets (U)
Carriages
340
341
34Z
343
344
345
346
347
a
Mounts Series
Carriages and Mounts--General
Cradl-s
Recoil Systems
Top Carriages
Bottom Carriages
Equilibrators
Elevating Mechanlms
Traversing Mechanisms
Material*
301
302
303
305
306
307
308
309
310
3L1
Handbooks
Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys
Copper and Copper Alloys
Magnesium and Magnesium Alloys
Titanium and Titanium Alloys
Adhesives
Gask.et Materials (Nonmetallic)
Glass
Plastics
Rubber and Rubber-Like Materials
Corrosion and Corrosion Protection of
Metals
Military
186
rotchnics Series
Part Two, Safety, Procedures and
Glossary
P~rt Three, Properties of Material
in Pyrotechnic Compositions
187
Used
S,
IJ
'C A
fN
...
fr
HEADQUARTERS
UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND
OPITSI1h1DN;AVAiH'I
DIST.
WASHINGTON Z5,
L)ALO
D. C.
L. id iPSP.U AL
28 February 1964
(AMCRD)
FOR THE COMMANDER:
OFFICIAL:
Chief, Ad
in strative Office
DISTRIBUTION:
Special
PREFACE
This handbook is the first of a planned series on Guns. It is part of a group
of handbooks covering the engineering principles and fundamental data needed
in the development of Army materiel, which (as a group) constitutes the Engineering Design Handbook Series. This handbook presents information on the fundamental operating principles and design of gun tubes.
Ja
n
This handbook was prepared by The Franklin Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for the Engineering Handbook Office of Duke University, prime contractor to the Army Research Office--Durham. The Guns Series is under the
technical guidance and coordination of a special committee with representation
from Frankford Arsenal of the Munitions Command; and Springfield Armory
and Watervliet Arsenal of the Weapons Command. Chairman of this committee
is Mr. Anthony Muzicka of Watervliet Arsenal.
Agencies of the Department of Defense, having need for Handbooks, may
submit requisitions or official requests directly to Equipment Manual Field Cffice
(7), Letterkenny Army Depot, Chambersburg, Pennsylvania. Contractors should
submit such requisitions or requests to their contracting uificers.
Comments and suggestions on this handbook are welcome and should be
addressed to Army Research Office-Durham, Box CM, Duke Station, Durham,
North Carolina 27706.
i~
iN
1A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PREFACE .......
.......................
v
..............
vii
...................
viii
..................
...................
................
....................
1
I
C. Types of Guns
........................
2
....................
2
2
......................
D. Muzzle ........
..
.....................
5
5
..................
5
5
5
5
5
.................
................
8
8
8
8
9
9
TABLE OF CONTENTS-(continued)
Pap
B. Heating ........
.....................
9
11
i1
C. Erosion ........
.....................
1. Causes ........
....................
2. Region Affected .......
................
12
12
12
13
.....................
13
................
A. Mechanical Design .......
1. High Strength Materials .....
............
2. Vibration Correction Measures .....
.........
3. Vibration Calculations ......
.............
B. Cooling Methods .....................
1.
2.
3.
4,
13
13
13
...
17
18
18
19
19
................
.............
22
..............
......................
................
.................
22
22
E. Bore ........
19
19
21
22
...
...
..........................
17
23
24
24
24
...
26
26
27
28
28
30
30
30
30
Ill
? | | l| | l
| l
| l
| l
TABLE OF CONTENTS-(continued)
G . R iding
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1. Profile .........
2. Rifling Twist .......
....................
.................
30
31
.................
3.
.....
38
38
39
40
40
41
41
7.
8.
9.
10.
44
45
45
45
................
Thermal Stresss ......
............
Inertia of Recoil Stresses .....
..............
Stress Concentration ......
Special Applications for Tube Analyses
......
..............
63
63
...
...
...
...
.................
.............
A. Monobloc Tube, Artillery .....
.................
1. Regular Tube .......
2. Autofreitaged Tube .................
B. Jacketed Tube, Artillery ......
.............
............
1. Tube With Single Jacket .....
2. Tube With Two Jackets ...............
Iv
64
64
66
66
66
66
68
71
71
72
72
73
74
74
...................
...............
B. Inspection .........................
CHAPTER 8. SAMPLE PROBLEMS .....
60
62
..
...................
I. Liner Design .......
...............
J. Quasi Two-Piece Tube ......
...............
K. Mechanical Features ......
...................
1. Threads .......
2. Rifling Torque Transmitters ................
3. Muzzle Attachments ..................
30
...
74
...
75
7,5
75
76
..
...
76
76
78
S3.
...............
83
84
..................
...
..................
...................
.
.
.
84
87
91
d
94
......................
REFERENCES .................
83
83
83
84
81
81
82
82i
99
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Fig. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page
..............
Typical Gun Tube Showing Regions ......
...............
Chambers of Various Tube Types ......
.......................
Jacketed Tube ..........
....................
Quasi Two-Piece Tube ........
Revolver Type Tube Showing Separate Chamber With Round
Gatling Gun Tubes .........
......................
Recoilless Gun Tube ........
.....................
Temperature Distribution Across Tube Wall
Temperature Along Outer Surface of Caliber .30 Tube ..........
...............
Thermal Cracks on Bore Surface ......
Dispersion-Frequency Ratio Curve ..................
...............
Gun Tube Showing Subdivisions .......
M/I Diagram of Gun Tube ......................
...................
Types of Rifling Contour .......
....................
Progressive Engraving ........
Interior Ballistics of Caliber .30 Gun ......
..............
..............
Case-Chamber Stress-Strain Curves ......
Chamber With Pertinent Dimensions .................
....
Forcing Cone Study .........................
.................
Schematic of Recoilless Gun .......
..................
Nozzle Entrance Geometry .......
...............
Pressure Ratio-Area Ratio Curve ......
.............
Lines of Constant Dimensionless Recoil
..................
Nozzle Shape&--Schematic .......
Nozzle Pressure-Area Ratio Curve, M10 Propellant ...........
...
...
...
2
4
6
6
6
6
6
9..........9
10
11
14
14
15
20
20
22
23
24
25
25
26
27
27
27
28
""Mow
L-
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS-(continued)
Fig. No,
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
6S
64
v1
Page
31
32
,,.
34
35
35
37
43
44
46
46
47
47
48
48
49
49
53
55
56
57
58
59
64
64
65
65
66
67
67
68
69
69
70
70
75
77
81
83
LIST OF TABLES
Table No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Pae
15
16
16
17
17
18
24
36
45
50
68
69
70
71
71
72
72
73
76
76
77
77
79
83
92
vii
LIST OF SYMBOLS
U
=
a.
A
=
=
A.
Ab
A.
A.
A,
F,
AF
G
h
I
J
k
k,
area of nozzle
= nozzle throat area
= nozzle area at distance x from the throat
= change in nozzle throat area
- twice distance from origin of rifling to
point of maximum pressure; outer radius
weight of propellant charge
L'
L
kinetic energy
= constant in rifling torque equation for
constant twist
f axial length of rifling curve; length of
engaged thread; length of key; length
of increment
length of diverging cone
load factor
d,
= depth of thread
L,
L.
M
M,
M,
pt
p,
p,.
pi
p..
F,
F.
p.
pA
A,
A.
&A4
b
CMP
D,
D,,
Ai,
LiD..
D.
aD,
E
E,
,.
ESP
I,
F
p
F,
vi.i
SViii
K
K,
L
M,.
LAI,
n
n.
N
p
PA
PIMP
pressure
p.
N.
LIST OF SYMBOLS-(continued)
p.
X.
r-vuruu
.,
pi
T
T,
T.
AT
v
V.
V
V,
V,
Vt
V.
W
W
W
Wi
W,
W,
W,
W,
x
Y
a
ag
ly
a
6,
6,
5
,.
6,
A
A,
A,,
0,,
6
6
.
1,
A
a
p
a,
Ob,
a.
Ct
C.
r,,
O,,.
q,.
l,
i.
LIST OF SYMBOLS-(continued)
tangentiai shrinK ft stress
tangential thermal stress
- tangential stress produced by radial
deflection
- allowable tensile stress
- yield strength of material
=
iU,
', 2
,, Q
x1
I
CHAPTnLR 1
INTRODUCTION
A. SCOPE AND PURPOSE
1!
CHAPTER 2
the front portion or bore through which the projectile travels when the round is fired; the rear
portion or chamber which houses the roand before
firing; the rear opening or breech through which the
ammunition is loaded; and the 'front opening or
muzzle from which the projectile emerges. In recoilless guns the rear opening or nozzle provides
for reeoillemness. Exceptions do prevail with respect
to the functions of these regions particularly with
breech opening and loading technique. For example,
most mortars are muzzle loaded and have permanently closed chambers. Figure I is a typical tube
showing the regions applicable to conventional guh
tubes.
A. CHAMBER
B--REECH
FIGUIlIR
-. *!,*,,**.
.~*~****-**
i"'
SC.BORE
7. The bore is formed by the inner surface of a
circular cylinder. It is the accelerating tube for the
projectile. Early firearms were smooth bore and
inherently inaccurate. Eventually, either by accident
or design, it was discovered that spinning the projectile about the flight axis increased accuracy.
Several methods have been introduced to achieve
this rotation. One method utilizes the behavior of
air impinging on canted fins attached to projectiles
such as projectiles fired from smooth bore mortars,
Another method uses rifling to impart the rotation.
Rifling consists of splines which spiral along the
bore surface. The raised portions are called lands,
the spaces between them are called grooves. The
spiral may have a constant angle of twist, i.e., a
helix, or it may have a variable angle of twist conforming to some exponential expression. As the
projectile moves through the bore, it turns with the
rifling at an angular velocity proportional to the
linear velocity and to the tangent of the angle of
twist,
'
.,nr
.'ai
(c)
CAMBERSNOWIGSCOMONENT
PROPLLANT
7BORR
(h)
RSCABRCNANN0IE
~~ ~
~
~ SML
~
ON KN
CHAPTER 3
tubes.
2. Jacketed Tubes
13. The jacketed, or built-up, type (Figure 3) is
constructed of two or more close fitting, concentric
tubes not of the same length. (It may, or may not,
have a replaceable liner.) The jackets do not extend
to the muzzle where pressures are low but are only
long enough to provide the built-up tube with wall
thicknesses required by the pressure along the bore.
Assembly is usually by shrink fit. Although the
jackets are not full-length, the inside tube, including
its unreinforced forward end, is still referred to as
. ...
... ... .. ..
.... ....
OUTER JACKET
-INNER
JACKET
F IGUIM,
Tubee.
U. Cuttf; (JunPec
Gtea~tt'eeGun Tubes.
I'~ICUL1IE 7.
sirable from the viewpoint of low weight and simplicity. However, to minimize manufacturing cornplexities, tubes with integral chambers are currently
employed with the nozzle being a separate cornthe chamber, usually
l!ponent ponet fastened
yted and
and sealed
shealed to
toite ha
ru
y
by sonic type of threaded joint.
the useapof
in changing
from orextended-life
no gain in reducing
usage. There
pears
to be little
7)
()1
7
..
CHAPTER 4
b, Rifting Torque
22. Rifling torque is another loading condition
closely associated with gas pressure. It varies directly as the gas pressure and as a function of the
rifling curve. Absolute values of this torque can be
large but ordinarily the gun tube is so rigid that the
induced torsional stress is inconsequential. However,
provision must be made in the mounts for absorbing
the torque.
3. Recoil Forces
23. Pxccoil forces as such are almost incidental to
tube design. !n single "ecoil systems, their effects
never exceed the axial stresses due to propellant
gas pressures. In double recoil systems, the inertia
forces created by secondary recoil accelerations bend
the tube, but secondary recoil occurs after the p
jectile leaves the tube thus its influence and t
of the propellant gas pressure cannot combine. Alone,
the stresses due to secondary recoil arn not critical
but should be
condato
to
rmplete the design
buteshigtiould bwhich
' egoLow
4. Vibration
24.
Smotion
\
|,oo-W
ft moms NN
D00-
--
0.,
FIGURE 8.
OM
1#77tI FRM
03(10 l
OA
0.4
l @=
B. HEATING
1. Thermal Stresses
26. The burning propellant releases a tremendous
amount of heat in the bore. Much of it is absorbed
by the tube. The bore surface, being adjacent to
the source, receives the brunt of it. If the heat were
applied gradually and a reasonable temperature
gradient appears through the tube wall, the induced
thermal stresses, being compressive in the inner
portion, would he analogous to autofrettage and,
therefore, beneficial. This, in effect, is what happens
in the tube of a rapid fire gun. During prolonged
firing, the temperature at the bore surface may
reach 20060F, whereas that at the other surface
will be only 1400"F. The temperature distribution
across the wall is logarithmic (see Fig. 8), lending
credence to the assumption that heat transfer
4_ _
fill_--.-_
_1 V.firing
1 -S
40
Sof
mawTM410
FIGURE 9. TernperatbreAlcng 0 t',r Surface of Caliber .0
Tube.
the wall it constant after reaching the steady state
condition, the basis for thermal stress calculations
of gun tubes. Thermal stresses may be considerable
but compensating pressure stresses are available to
confine them to the noncritical range. Thermal
stresses still prevail after pressures cease but to a
lesser extent 1,ecause bore temperatures drop as soon
as hot gases begin to disappear. Since temperatures
vary along the tube length (Fig. 9), the gradient
too will vary, not only according to the heat input
itself but also according to variations in wall thi,%ness. Although the heat input is less at the thin wall
stress considerations.
I
1 P
10
I.~~~~
~~~~~.. '.~.~'*A~~ck~....-.....tMb
-....
-----
Q)
2.
11
I v
12
ha-,
, .......
.---- --....-
the first is induced by gas wash, the second by ordinary sliding friction. Intense heat also contributes
indirectly to erosion, by melting an extremely thin
layer of the bore surface, thus making it easier for
the gases and band to carry off the material. Also,
because of high heat, some constituents of the propellant gases may combine with the metal at the
bore surface. The newly formed compound, probably
a nitride and therefore brittle, may crack and peel
off under the action of rotating bands and propel.
lant gases.
2. Regions Affecte4
36. The region at the origin of rifling suffers most
from eros'ion. Here the factors conducive to high
erosion rates are most destructive. Temperatures are
highest, engraving takes place here, and frictional
forces are highest. Tests have shown that engraving,
friction, and gas wash contribute approximately
one-third each to the total wear*. This proportion
occurs only when relatively cool-burning propellants
are used. When the charge consists of hot-burning
propellants, the erosion induced by the gases is so
great that wear due to other causes becomes relatively insignificant. Although propellant gases move
faster farther along the tube and should be more
erosive than at the origin of rifling, the other contributing causes diminish considerably, with a subsequent lower rate of erosion. The rate increases
again at the muszle but not nearly as much as at
the
ofu rifling.
ce eorigin
a d m
z e r o iThe
n h actual
s e v rcause
b n doft the
r i ace .
celerated muzyle erosion has never been determined.
However, it moy be considered secondary, for the
damaging effects sustained by the projectile at the
origin can never be completely undone by corrective
measures, introduced at the muzzle.
$ Reference 3, page 599.
F1
F
CHAPTER 5
37. A gun tube should have all the physical properties required for efficiency and durability. Since
some of the ideal physical properties may not be
congruous, a compromise may have to be made,
reducing the resistance against one adverse phenomenon in order to retain the effectiveness against
another. It is not good design practice to compromise
strength in a gun tube. A tube should always be
strong enough to support its loads including pressure
and inertia forces. Failure attributed to these forces
renders the tube beyond salvage regardless of its
resistance to heat and erosion. The attractive feature of high strength materials, particularly steel,
is the ability to withstand other destructive agents
to an acceptable degree. Even if these properties
are less than adequate, corrective measures discussed earlier in the chapter are available to overcome the deficiency.
2. Vibration Correction Measures
38. Structural failures due to vibrations are infrequent and highly unpredictable. From the viewpoint of economy, corrective measures are usually
adopted only after iailure occurs. This is particularly
true for muzzle cracking due to dilative vibrations.
However, one must be aware that tubes are inherently weaker at the muzzle because of the open
end effects awd failure here may be due to normally
applied pressures. An overall thicker wall or a
gradual thickenipg at the muzzle to form a muzzle
bell will increase tube strength. The vibrations which
disturb accuracy are corrected by a change in tube
maw or shape. A heavier tube may also absorb the
(la)
where
I,
F-
(lb)
where
acceleration of gravity, 386.4 in/sect
dynamic forne of each beam increment, lbn
w - deflection of beam increment, in.
i critical speed, rad/sec
The critical speed may be written in terms of
natural frequency,
g
(1c)
__
* Reference 4.
I/ \/\
*1
lIlOlIll
A,
1019UPIlCY
NATO.of
L -=2.0 lb
!
- W6. - SdA
41o W.,- v
-E
d'
W!.
"
d'
S1
-1. 5'
64
49 in '
.condition,
- .2
--
2.0'
.785 in'
" WN,
W,
- W,
where
L - 4 in., length of each increment
a - .283 lb/in', density of steel
Calculations of M/I at each station on the beam
as indicated in Figure 13 are arranged in Table 1.
Now calculate the area moment of the M/I
curve. The moments of the area are found at the midspan of each increment as indicated numerically in
Figure 13. The M/I curve represents a new loading
the load on each increment being trapezoidal. The calculations are arranged in Table 2.
The moments of the simulated beam are taken from
left to right.
Showing the calculations for Station 6,
-
ZM+
A 1 s+ AL7
14
3653 lb/in2
%
'
NOTE
--
TP VALU
NUMlNRS
-ARE
FORRIO
I PARENTHESES
THE
SECOND
Pt"XiMATON CALCULATIONS
HIq'
II
ZWy,
sOXAG
17180 lb/in
critical speed is
Mu
IW V
MY'J
WJ~-, /1
2; U,,
fi 9 X 10ibin',
m duus f easI
it
20 X 10W lb/in-, modulus of Plasticity
Stiu
,"4,t
2.0
2.0
he
2.0
ed
2.72
d
re 2.72
of
2.72
fg
3.56
gKi
3.50
hi
3.56
01
ak;
IV
XI.
Ax
M
TV,
Wg
- 104 200
86.4
7 W
(11)(I)
(1
"W
h
i
323 ad/see
g - 380.4 in/see2
dynamic loading based
Now repeat the (
oi w,.
,alculations
n but
this time with the
Thus
a
b)
4!
d
0
f
200
where
EMA
wer
ZM7A + MAL
-MA4
- 20100 + 17180 - 37280 lb/in
S.....E
where
0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.72
11.44
14.16
17.72
21.28
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
ll1
(in)
AX
0
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
]b-in)
a IV
4.(X)
40( )
4.00
5.14
5.14
5.14
7.10
7.10
7,141
(lb-fil)
AAle
0
8.0
10.0
24.0
34.0
45.8
56.6
70.0
85.1
!
(llb-11)
4.X)
16
,0
30.0
65,1
105
1M
2120
208
310
)
(llb-11
16
04
144
142
228
338
280
:378
4W0
1I
n)
(lb/in')
stati(b/in)
AA
(lb/in')
(in)
(in)
(in)
933
81s
i
1.02
707
6M9
933
1.02
3.02
7
6
no
621
413
285
248
104
24
647
511
327
287
168
56
2465
3683
4921
5648
6457
6992
7264
.98
1.03
1.04
1.0
1.05
1.07
1.11
3.02
2.98
3.04
3.04
3.0
3.07
3.14
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
2
1
Station
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
A,
qA L
(lb/in)
rA,
(lb/in)
(11)/in)
(lb/in)
(lb/in)
950
720
580
640
430
280
200
110
30
0
2460
1840
1980
1580
990
860
520
180
0
3730
9820
14610
19680
23380
25830
27970
29080
950
6910
12240
17180
21660
24680
26950
28000
29270
950
7860
20100
37280
5940
83590
110540
139140
168410
SEA
MA
area moment
A
ZA
qAL
rA.t,
MA
SEA
ZMA
lb-in;
V"IW
317 rad/sec
V1
St4tation
(in)
(Ib)
(lb-in)
(lb-in')
1
2
3
4
.o08
.0048
.00382
,0o288
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.7r2
11.60
9.60
7.64
7.84
67.3
46.1
29.2
22.6
frequency
.00203
2.72
5.52
11.21
a
7
8
,001287
00694
AD=27
2.72
3.50
3.56
3.50
2.47
.97
____
,___0______,____,1____
930
16
Wv,
X 10'
Wyl? X 10'
4.60
1.715
.265
.___4
1.
2w "
.5
eycles/seoond
1200
-0
20 rounds/second
From Equation la, the frequency ratio is
( )
TABLE 4. A/11
1V,
S.tu
N-0
(lh)
a
1)
C
d
e
oa
ab
be
ed
de
ef
fg
gh
hi
3.13
2.59
2.06
2.11
1.49
.94
.67
.26
.03
g
h
i
Ar
aW.
Xx.W
Ml/I
(lb)
(in)
(in)
(lb-in)
(lb-in)
(Lb.in)
(Ib/inl)
0
3.13
5.72
7.78
9.89
11.38
12.32
12.99
13.25
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
6.26
5.18
4.12
4.22
2.98
1.88
1.34
0.56
0.06
0
12.5
22.8
31.9
39.6
45.5
49.3
52.0
53.0
6,26
23.9
50.9
86.2
129
176
227
279
332
25
96
204
187
2980
382
290
356
422
=Zv1
a trend is
until
eachthemodification
performed
aid of Figure
11, this trend
established. for
With
readily predicts the tube stiffness necessary for
dispersion.
S505
f,
20
2.52
Checking this value on the curve (Figure 11) shows
Checkingminimum
that it falls on a minimum dispersion portion of the
curve and may be acceptable. However, frequency
ratio greater than 3.5 is preferred. This would require that the tube be made stiffer (and heavier) to
increase its natural frequency if the firing rate of
750 rounds per minute is to be retained. Firing tests
eventually determine whether the dispersion caused
by tube vibration is acceptable. If not, the tube is
modified to change its stiffness and firing tests are
S)
B. COOLING MKETHOD8
1. Large Tube Kamme
Ai
(lb/in')
811
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
679
626
713
513
383
354
156
37.5
. (lb/in')
(lb/in')
745
613
718
611
420
400
246
85.5
-
811
2235
3474
4905
6029
6832
738
7M
q
(in)
(in)
(in)
1.01
1.02
.98
1.02
1.03
.99
1.05
1.07
1.11
3.01
3.02
2.98
3.08
3.08
2.99
3.07
3.14
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
qA&
rAn..
4A,
MA
Z'A
Station
(Ib/in)
(lb/in)
(lb/in)
(lb/in)
(lb/in)
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
819
693
613
728
58m
379
372
167
42
0
2240
1850
2140
1850
2170
1200
756
256
0
3240
8940
13900
19600
24100
27330
308o0
31980
g19
6170
11400
16770
21960
25750
28900
31260
32260
819
69
1i400
35200
57100
82900
11180
141000
17300M
'4R
TABLE 6. NATURAL FREQUEMCY PARAMETERS,
DYNAMIC CONDITION.
-,
W. tWYu X 10'
(Ib)
(lb-in)
Wyl X 10'
(lb-in')
-
station
(in)
.00605
2.0
2.10
73.20
2
3
*a
6
.00493
.03M
.00286
.00197
.00121
2.0
2.0
2.72
2.72
2.72
9.86
7.72
7.78
5.36
3.29
48.60
29.75
22.25
10.58
3.98
4100635
3.86
3.6
M000241
2.26
1.41.
.21
.000028
3.86
,86
.10
44.
-questionable.
1O
-.
- , . .,.,..---
ice
A
r
*.
S....
2. Rifling
50. The bore erodes most severely at and near the
origin of rifling. Attempts have been made to al.
leviate this condition by varying the design of the
rifling itself, introducing some 7,ariations to ease the
engraving process and to reduce band pressures, and
to reduce rifling torque. Depth of rifling and width
of groove are usually determined from the dynamics
of the projectile while in the bore, with little leeway
extended toward modification of these parameters.
19
--
j4
-----LA
I.
reached. A new gun with constant twist rifling prenejts no problem. Engraving is cumplete, w-lth rifllhig
and rotating band mating perfectly to impart torque
to the projectile. On the other hand, a worn gun
or a revolver type weapon presents a difficult
.LLIP.
FIGURE 14. Type of Rifling Contour.
interference between band and rifling increases, However, the susceptibility to large stress concentration suggests large fillets and a trend toward rounded
contours.
If the rifling twist is uniform, the theoretical instantaneously acquired angular velocity during engraving creates a torsional impact which may cause
rotating band failure. Furthc rmore when it first
reaches the rifling of a worn isun the band barely
touches the lands and the shallow contact is not
sufficient to. carry the load. The rifling here racy act
as a cutting tool, machining off the top band surface. Or, perhaps the contact is light enough and
the slope shallow enough that the rifling swages the
band rather than engraves it. The problem is to
find a rifling capable of minimizing the abuse.
51.
F. 2
Low"M TIST
"INamf
v~M
04ttlaft f ken&
S* idwftIel awsead
FIGURE 15. Pores#ae Engraving.
..
,.
..
".
21
. ....
. .. .. ..
..-.
..
.. .
. . ....
Iii
CHAPTER 6
i chamber pressure
distance from breech of equialent chamber
to point A
aS- distance from breech of equivalent chamber
to base of projectile
SO - SA for maximum pressure at A
p.
,
0,2
IO
142
0
ISO
PIRiSURE - TRAVCL
TRAVEL
1VELOCITY
S|~
PRESSORE -
~4
VEL*OCITY
- TIME
TRAVEL(I1,)
11OJECTOL.E
22
TIME
Smust
Srcvr
corn-
stressed
would be
chamber
sures ohriethe
andtoo
therefore
improperly
beyond
its yield strength
NO
"CLO
S',
"-M&P
W.
Cbm-
,,, "a
MM-(0)
M- ft"
.aN-* NO.,
,.ji
.. . . .
.. .. ...
.
.. .
... .. . ...
..
. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .
. . . -
:.
=R ,
~ ~/
T.
0"
j
-an
-7
inch (TPI).
________per
ft
",
T"7w
Included TPI
in/iln
0.040
0.200
0.040
C61..20 W&b
(3s. J8 MAMMIN Gun
(hIL.8
JOMe
20 ann Usabiue Gun
30ornnm iaebisnh
47 anrnMachinesGm
24
0.082
0.2036
0.080
0.100
Tube
37 tmnGun MWA
75 mm Gun M3
76 mlm Gun MIA2
900mm Gun MJAI
105 mm Gun M3T4
120OrmmGun M1
155 mm Gun M2
Inciluded TPI
ilk/in
0.1514
0.1367
0.2000
0.26W0
0.3350
0.13.33
0.1000
$~ALOW
AMEconstant
*111
(6)
dude
muzzleTheenergy,
weight of ebaige, and volume
~of
charge.
kinetic energy of the propoatile aLw
the muzzle, or mussle eneary
K -
P
S
2Kr
tuRnpoiEc:rgLE
1
~e. II'.(41s)
2~
- ROTATING
BAND
0 -RIFLING GROOVE
P -
]I lb*
Cw
(4b)
p qN~ILThe
*PRI
OSTC
27. 1m'/lb
V.
Thbasaeotesaeocpidy
Tebgsae rtesaeocpdb
lant package of a round of ammunmition
C
A,
(4c)
eprel
h rpl
(4d)
Asmn httemnm-co~cinlwho
Assuellng thatrte misteunimum o tem osetale throat
proelan
isthesults.enome hra
the required maximum chamber lengthi
'Reference
_______E
_________
9.
-I --
SORE
25
..... . .
........
......
. ...
1. Parameters
r
b
FI N
-balancing
a---
data are:
.empirical
A1,-14
ab '
'
br' sin-;
(4 )
if
A 5: 1.70,
A,
the divergence angle is less than 15
angle), and if A,/A, - 2 where
(5b)
(included
.
....
(Be)
where
half angle of the diverging cone.
Equation So may now be corrected to
_A
-A, 1.45
(d)
26
S......
....
um"
Ito
Ila
lo
1.0
s0
40
so
A.
the corresponding
r.
(50
(5g)
.
tan a
2. Nozzle Shape
73. A central orifice nozzle (Fig. 24a) is of optimum
design in the sense that it is the simplest and lightest.
This is most important because low weight is usually
(56)
- .(-AA)A,
Lf
4k
1*.0
1'*
(FIGURE
&o
DsvS4
,.0
Rewil.
"-I
Amt
OMI
AN OUZLF.
,NeOt
ARI
AMA
A
K.,Mm, AT--M,1
segmented nozzle of 8 pieces held by a cireumferential spring. It dilates for the round to be loaded
by the radial displacement of the segments. This
"typerequires
S'.
A
AREA""a 1AVA11
.*)
.Y/
S...
.
..
. ...
. .
....
..
. .........
.. ................
...................
....................
"
A,'
L1
& '-'
(5h)
where
A , - nozzle throat area
A, - nozzle area at z
, - chamber pressure
p, - pressure in nozzle at x
4. Recoil Balancing
78. In the recoilless weapon field, recoil is defined
as the momentum of the weapon which is derived
from the residual impulse between gun tube and
nozzle. An ideal nozzle would maintain the weapon
motionless during the firing cycle. However, perfection is not sought since variations in performance are
always present and slight variations from round to
round are unavoidable. In the long run, the progressive wear in the tube and nozzle will aggravate
these variations. Hence, a slight amount of recoil
is tolerated. In fact, some recoil is deliberately
planned since it is desirable, for maximum nozzle
life, to have the initial recoil at as high a level as
can be tolerated, in the rearward direction. As the
Rererence n.
, ...
...
.. ..
....
...
. .....
1,.
;''lu
*U.UVAL I1Ile
where
)
S
recoil on the gunner will be reflected in physiological effects of excessive rearward recoil, effects on
his stability, and psychological effects of forward
recoil. The recoil should not be so severe as to
injure him, or to destroy his aim by disturbing his
stability or cause him to flinch. Limited tests have
indicated that the impulse should not exceed 3.0
lb-sec (rearward), the limit specified for the 90 mm
M67 rifle (Military Specification, MIL-R-45511).
Experience with conventional weapons leads him
to expect rearward recoil of reasonable intensity
and he will accept it, but forward recoil will be disconcerting. On a mount, the effects of recoil forces
involve stability and strength of structure including
attachments such as the mounting trunnions of the
gun. Usually, the stability of the system dictates the
rearward and forward limits of recoil, When these
limits have been established, the effects on structural strength can be absorbed by designing the
mount accordingly,
Recoil is usually specified as an impulse. Since
impulse and momentum have the same dimensions,
the equations associated with recoil may be stated
in terms of momentum. On this basis, action and
reaction being equal and opposite, the momentum
of the recoiling mass plus the impulse of that generated by the nozzle equals the projectile momentum.
Expressed as an equation
M, +
F. dt - Mv,.
(6a)
- acceleration of gravity
AA. - A.
nozzle force
mass of projectile
momentum of recoiling mass
time of propellant gas period
- differential time of application of P.
Firing tests performed with the recoilless rifle suspended as a pendulum provide the data for computing the projectile and recoil momentum of Equation 6a and hence, for. recoil balancing. The weapon
is freely suspended and fired. Muzzle velocity, amplitude of pendulum swing and period are measured,
These measurements are used to determine projectile momenturm and recoil momentum of the
suspended mass. Thus:
where
F.
M,
M,
9.
di
T(g)
T9
(6d)
where
A. - original nozzle throat am
AA - indicated change in throat area
Since this relationship is approximate, variables
such as propellant gas pressure and chamber-noshe
configuration may yield even wider deviatkas.
Hence, Equation Od should be used as a guide only.
A more precise relationship becomes available for
the individual gun after interpreting the experi.mental data obtained for this gun during the balaneing process.
It is important to note that when the required
amount of material is removed from the throat f
the nozzle, the remaining sharp cornemr or dihman-
2I
u. OitO
1. Bore Diameter
80. The nominal bore diameter is determined by
the combined effort of ballistician and projectile
designer in meeting the terminal ballistic requirements of the projectile. Although the tube designer
specifies surface finishes and tolerances, practice
has set a plus tolerance of 0.002 inch on practically
all tubes of 20 mm or larger. Smaller tubes have
smaller tolerances, usually 0.0015 inch.
2. Bore Length
81, The length of the bore is determined with the
aid of interior ballistics. For a given projectile, a
propellant charge is designed which will impart the
required velocity within a distance, i.e., bore length,
compatibb with the particular use of the weapon.
If the ballistics of an established round of ammunition meet the requirements of a proposed gun, then
the bore length is made to coincide with the travel
distance to the point corresponding to the desired
muzule velocity on the velocity-travel curve. An
approximate length can be determined provided
several data are known. This method is used in
recoilless rifle design. Assuming that the data are
A
a.,
K
M,
u
- bore area
- maximum projectile acceleration
- kinetic energy of projectile (Equation 4a)
- projectile mass
pie.zometric efficiency
(7a)
SK.
(7b)
ap,,A,
p is determined from empirical data from test gun
firings. In the absence of such data p - 0.6 is a
reasonable approximation for guns with expansion
.30
F T
F. T!MPERATUR! DISTRIDUTION
. RIFLING
1. Profile
83.
K6,
Rifling and rotating band are intimately associated because of their respective functions-that of
imparting torque to the projectile and that of transmitting this torque. The mating lands are the load
transmitting members and should be designed so
that both rifling and band can support the induced
41.A
(8a)
where
G
Ole
66
0.94
70
0.,2
go
o.0
OF
_0
140
30
0.02 10
0.o
ow 0419 (14
FIGURE 26. OroaveBore Reaiion".
(8b)
h - ,01Db
A
90
oo06
=
2. Rifling Twist
85. The rotational velocity of the projectile, or
bullet spin, varies directly with the tangent tf the
developed rifling curve. Since two primary requirements of exterior ballistics are the values at the
muzzle of velocity and spin rate, the tube designer
is given the required exit angle of the rifling or the
bullet spin. But the tube designer is &lso concerned
with the rifling characteristics throughout the tube
and therefore is also given the interior ballistics
curves. The twist of rifling is usually expressed in
31
W..-..
(9a)
Y= X
n
exponent which defines the rifling curve
p - cunistant determined from the exit angle
7.62 MM
CAL .50
9.5
TYPE B
TYPE A
G
9
D,
0,817
AG
.04
b
.205
w
.205
r
,01
C
--
16
12
16
24
28
28
32
32
.36
36
36
:;8
32
42
48
48
04
68
72
84
92
96
1.216
1,497
1.618
2.284
3.010
3.080
3.W
3.623
4.194
4.208
4.224
4.208
4.574
4,790
6.100
6.200
8.140
O.AM09
10.160
132.200
f'4.240
10.280
.004
.004
.004
.004
.004
.004
.002
.004,
.004
,004
.004
.004
.008
.008
.00
.008
.006
.008
M00
.135
.2314
.220
.1730
.18AM
.1860
.1978
.1978
.2108
.2108
.2108
.2168
.2945
.2016
.2413
249M
.2350
,2611)
2019
.2093
.2868
.3142
.098
.15
,069
.120
1444
.16
,1M
.15
.18
.16
.15
.15
.1473
Ai5
.1,34
.15
.1571
.1740
.1744
.01
.01
.024
.02
.015
.015
.002
.015
.015
.015
.015
.015
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.030
BORE
20MM
0.707
30MM
37MM
1.181
40MM
87MM
76MM
3-IN
80MMS
90MM
n.4M7
1.573
2.244
2,90
3.000
3.343
3.543
4.134
4.134
4.134
4.134
4.600
4.700
0.000
6.lO0
8.000
9.449
10.0-0
105UMt
I05MM*
105MM
106MMO
4.8-1N
4.7-IN
6-IN
SIMM
&IN
240MM
10-IN
M2O000
12-IN
14.000
14IN
16.0t00
16-IN
;
Ielvamhzl,
t~eltmrFIGURE
'(X)8
,(S
.008
32
...
.1795
.1912
,2090
--
.01
.0
,01
,015
.015
.013
.015
.015
IM,erinheral
(Eqlation I I)
The coinstant, p, is found hy differentiating Equation 9a.
dx"
dy
(9b)
pnz"'' - tan a
(9c)
4 ,-.
where
nAxN
dx
N
I"N
R
0
a
e)
('f'-- 1) tan ax
-da-1
0,-2
(of
g
hr
(Og)
where
coefficient of friction
T-4#
of
(11)
yi-RO
(9i)
x-
tan a
-,__ede
R .w
dt
(12)
0
d'
where
he
(10)
tan a
tan1
an%-
d d tan a
based
madepresented
available on
by the
Springfield
Armory.
Mefr.in
of rifling
nielianics
material
'Theon datu,
(13)t
"ence 12.
(R
,I
33
..
i[
.-
...--
---..
. . . ..-...
I II
I I
I.
-k C.--
S d(v tan a)
di
di
l d'x
&
T P x
S(atan
dxLdA
dz
~R
A fibore area
p, - propellant gaa pressure
di
dx. d'N
dt dz di
, dtn*
(1v4)
tan ,
wherepA
T - (1 -
tan a)R
R'
d tana
dI
+t'
(17)
(15a)
(15b)
tan
N p a tana +
-v
Linear accele|Rto
i
o a
dt_
J-
(16a)
A - N in a M
co a
IN
T - M
a
L
(18)
R
d.
For uniform twist rifling, d tan a/dx is zero, and
Equation 18 reduces to
(T
(16b)
at-
74000ON'
,P
34
10
to
30
40
so
so
70
so
90
(1A)
ia
go
o
I
10
LCWMTOF INFLOWJif,1
40
as
so
N
FIGURE 31. Tipped Parabola.
35
070
1
(Ib-in)
0
0.01041.3
0.0014
0.04
.M
0.GA577
0.0039
0
009
1.37
0
37.
6.4
2.10
2.79
3.42
4.04
4.14
5.38
4.97
(1--in)
(dz-il,)
OASl
SAK
0.1038
0.00062
0.00G6
to
0.71
OYI0
0.0044S
21.1
5.71
7.8
13.9
21.7
0.08
0.811
01
006
.107M
0
3.4
6.1
0
7.3
12.5
8.0
8.1
16.1
8.9
6.2
8.9
8.7
8.1
8.4
1.0
10.8
11.9
12,7
13.6
13.2
1815
20.0
20.8
21.4
21.7
21.6
OAM
0.00418
0.00428
19.2
6.00
7.5
14.1
21.0
O1
0.00402
16.2
6.50
750
14.3
21.3
O.1303
0.0920
O.ASIS
0.00382
opoAM8
mat the 0.000
08or
15.0
13.9
12i9
12,0
6.71
6.80
7.0o
7.16
6.8
6.6
6.4
6.2
14.4
14.4
14a3
14.3
21.2
21.0
20.7
20.5
06r0es8
opea ue
11.s
7.2r
6s0
14,2
20.2
Mow
0.1006
0uted
0.0042
10f5
9.9
7.40
7.51
3,6
14s1
19.i
21q
22:
ati.o
ala
o.wt3
&aa
OA.1M
8.8
7.59
7.67
5f4
8.3
14.0
13.9
19.4
10.2
a.2t
2.
4
0.11p
a.1280B
Git
e.2
OAMM
8.4
8.0
7.75
7.84
5.1
13i8
13.7
1f.0
18.8
13
14
is
1S
buibtis
(ftl/we')
15
16
17
S09
S12
I'17
(ppi)
10.0
44.0
47.5
45.9
42.9
38.4
33.4
29.2
23.4
26.0
0.075
020738
GAE
13
14
W(ik)ia-"
""u"v19
20
17.5
0.25
7.2
14.2
1.8
21.4
14.1
19.7
Ld.
To
'ipplenm
in Figures
29
ani
d 30
and to Hktt dinformation
the method for
computing
or
19 andcalculations
the torques are
computed
each rifling.
detailed
listed for
in Table
8 onlyThe
for
a ei aurv
nuM arn
rth
i
iaun tonm o t
b. quadratic sbok with one inch free run
a. tiped parabos with
one inch free run
" e iealnmth
wih on
Td.
expntial with
no chfreerunand
ruL
tra.
0.1,,at one-inch
bor increments of
*.computed
for ea& rifing
travel. In addition to the
L
R
W
p
--
i24
o projectile travel in bore
0.15V,
in, distane
bore "Miu
140 grais - OM] 1b, projectile weight
.TR, radis of gyration of projectile.
attlbr~eing
im 'no
36
simplify the tTbulation procedure, the torque con,puted from Equation 18 is divided into two cor(The tortea torue nobecomponent
,
t
,
R
the velocityone
component
T-T.+ A, m(ltan
ap 5 8 2tn~o
T. - M,- V'
v.dta
0048vOd tna
r T. Mu
ta, b a
,05doai.a
de
(211))
(22s)
(22)
-24 int
II
q:_
'd 0I
II
10
a. ve lo"
" /o
9
...
Yr,pal
10
ma
12
14
YrAVIL t41.)
14
SO
tan
tan 7'
0.123 and a ta
a - 0
.z
d
-
- 51.9 X 10'
When x
2.
1.0
- 24 - 1.0
0.425
25.
"
0.p
L-
-.4
.
-pz
0.123__
.123.
0.652;
T-
- 0.421
23i=M
dtnx
23
From Equation
d tan a
d0
M [(4.92
-0035T
23
lb-in
y =
8
- L -
24 in.
-- .
From Equation9c
d t-=n-a
a++
"X. -
According to Equation 22
TT
- (85.8pea" + 5.7Wa6-*'")1o- l-in
d tan a
When z.
2.4 in
a - =8 X 2R tanat
2pz / + 8x2
1.0 - 24 - 1.0 - 23 in
-
d
' dx'
a, tan a -0, 8
2z'"
P/a,
p/
and tn a -
-p'/Vz + ps/a.
i selced t sow
16)
37
v
x
. .
0.01053
z'm- 283,d tan a
- 0.00372
-2. 3
X
According to Equation 22
T - (51.9 X 0.0955 X 12,900 + 5.48 X 7,02
X 10' X 0.00372)10-" - 6.4 + 14.3 - 20.7 lb-in
e: Exponential (1,0 in. Free Run) y - PX 1.
With 1.0 in. free run,
x#- L-
1.0- 23 in.
1.0-24--
0,123
x
tan a -F3"
Do
From E tn
,the
rquation
0.625 X 0.123
dtana
dx
__
-
i3'"'s"
mo11
75
)10-' lb-in
90. The torque curves in Figure 32 indicate that
the exponential rifling, y - px., either with or
without free run are superior to the others inasmuch
as their torques are practically constant after reaching a maximimn. After free run, the exponential
curve (curve d) has an instantaneous infinite torque
which is of little consequence since it reduces to
12 lb-in, in less than 5 microseconds. It soon reaches
the torque exhibited by its counterpart; the exponentlai curve with no free run. The two torque
curves then continue along the remainder of the
bore travel within 3 percent of each other; so close
to each other that there would he some difficulty
in distinguishing them as being separate.
10.
'References 14, 15, 1O.
38
Reference 17.
*,it,.1-
1-.4,
10-
4h..
39
Thew, stresses are then inserted in the von MisesHencky equation following the "Strain Energy
Theory of Failure" to find the equivalent stress. a-..
"
Do(D- + DM)
D'(D
D)
"
(25)
where
DA - inside diameter
D. - outside diameter
D - diameter at any point (varying from D,
to D.)
For stress computations, the rifling groove diameter
is generally considered to be the inside diameter.
The maximum tangential stress occurs at the inner
wall
P
(26)
where
W -D
)
Di)
(2a
(27a)
40
S... .... .
.. . . ...
. .. ... .. ..
. ..
..
... : .
. . . ... . ..
..
.. . ..
......
.. . .....
(29b)
W" WL D,'V/iVt
The jacket wall ratio is
where
c - distance from the center to the stress
location
The shrink fit pressure equation is derived by resorting to the Shear Theory of Failure which states
that
(30a)
- q,
,. - ju. where
T - rifling torque
U,
D. - OD of ejacket
D. -p OD of liner, ID of jacket
A - pressure at Dr, induced by shrink fit
- total
a shrink interference between liner and
jacket
The wall ratios of tube and liner are derived by
equating the stresses at each inner surface and
solving for the wall ratio of the built-up tube and
expressing this ratio in terms of allowable stress and
V,+
design pressure. Thus
(2'
U,.
__
W.
(29a)
radial stress
of
Rfornee18.
W3
(30b)
(300)
where
p - internal pressure
p. - shrink fit pressure
W - wall ratio of total wall
W,, - liner wall ratio (inside tube wali ratio)
Substitute the expressions for a, and a, in Equation
30a. Further, substitute V/W for W, (Equation 29b)
and for W in terms of ,. (Equation 29a), then solve
for
.
-
(31)
4o,. - 2(
EL
Et
18.
W +-- I
(32a)
-t
VW
WD,-29
\--
vi
(32b)
Mmeo
v-1 I
Bisedon
Euaton
2 an
pae
34
ofRefrmo
18
'
where
p.,
-
~,.~ ~ ~1
~pip-
1. +AI
I*umue aLiD2,
(32c)
(37)
1
whr
1P
(33a)
0
(3)
The corresponding stresses on the outer surface of
the liner are
via -v.P4Wi
-
(Y
(34a)
p.(34b)
-C
(38a)
Then
XCS .~ (A
~XD
3b
(35+aI and(3)
~ p,(35b)
Woo -
(a)Wij
W"'
(36b)
- D1.-W
(39A)
- AI/D, W2,
caclte
ID,/ - WI"'
IID
30
i/
3e
D
e The srn i
Te shinkfitpresur isfound from Equation 31.
Half of this pressure is developed at Do and half
(0
2
'
a
Distributed thusly, the shrink fit pressures require
approximnately the same overlap at D, and D.. The
tagniland radial stresses on the inner surface
of the liner due to shrink fit are, respectively,
go$
P~
2WDc",ienia
PmWr"
4)
14-
'al
0.0S
"~LL
(I
IATIO
W
Ption.
Psi
(42a)
-..
-pW
it
1",2)
at#
Olt
O*-
Wit
-WE*
{)
-Pa
(45b)
'W 7I(4a
0_
(3b)
(48a)
.Ws(43a)
a,- Plost
pot 0 !
p""W
~Pa
(44b)
I...
_._.__
(46b)
_---.----
defined as the design pressure divided by the allowaxie stress: v, - p/a.. The allowable stress may
be the yield strength, the elastic limit, or rome other
IhAt of practical signifinse. In exrtilery a,. in the
elastic limit. Figure 33 is a guide for det raining
which type tonstruction is most practical. For
example, a tube with atpressure factor of P, 0.80
will renuire the following wall ratios:
W - 2.0 for n
"W-
Tn'W
inTb
In; + t,
(47)
where
D,/2, iner :%'Jiuo
2.54 for n -
IVW
- 3.2.5 for a - 2
ia - number of layers
There is no solution for n - I since W - m in
Equation 37 for any value of Pi > 0,577. The
choice would be the cold worked or the threelayered tube. At the lower end of the pressure
factor range, the monobloc and two layered construetion become the mast practical,
A pmcicial aprIroech to determine the effects of
shrink fit in small arms tube design (quasi twopiece lined barrel deign, Fig. 4) is shown later in
Paragmpls 133 and 168. The shrink fit pressure, as
a function of the interface fit, is computed first and
then applied to the inside cylinder as external preBsure and to the outside cylinder as internal pressure.
*1i
e
t.
AT
W
Whether the tube is of monobloc or multilayer construetion, the temperature and thermal stresses are
computed as though it were one piece. The tangential
thermal stress at r is
EaAT
2(1 - P) In W
r
b
-[I - In
- _
r W
where
7. Termal Stresses
( +
1 ?)),
(*Ia)
(4b
(4In
(48)
4
"(1
op
44
IU~al
DiMrio
~butiss
I..
T
1). In W - In
When r -a
FJ*URE 34.
Z. )
(49.)
or when r - b,
(49b)
)~
PWin,/ Wp
~~~~
.. p
________
2I
When
wri
W,
In W)
12.0
(5oa)
1.78
1.8
1.25
=a,
In W)
2W'
_____I
, -
2(1
~)W 2
-PAW5"
IV
I-r-.-n
1the
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-10
1.67
1.97
2.60
4.67
(Mfb)
When r =b,
-
2.5
(0)
u,
u/
1 904!
1.3-10
.3,33
.485
.800
1.790
2..I
2.57
3.11
4.83
2.083
2.34
2.62
3,22
5.16
1.003
1.013
1.020
1.035
1.070
of loWWsdcylinder,
I), axial PMMUMsressua
+ VS.+ 011
011P
a,-u,+
a'
a', + V.,
0.0-
(51)
(52)
9, Strew Concentration
(53)
45
I j
1~/I~/f/~~
II
I1Y~'~t'IV'
onditirms
01t.4hese
N'Pvnmpq
To
MAN
MAN-
*-
C~P
-S
~~
~
--
~
-
- -
(54)
-p
-40,000 lb/in2
4,W0 02-475,700lb/ins
W21
,-=
I&ANLNT
PORNFrom
AOKA
75,00n lb/in2
me
.~
150,00
----
--
f
1201600-------------------
---------- -----
-~
~
proxmatey
te yild
haf srenth, ~g.,~
can be tolerated in steels which have been heat
treated to a yield strength of 1,50,000 psi. The ex46
ao
------5,0-----
---..........
-------
------
49%0
-1
WO1
MOMW-
SA1
XLIT
--
*-u
---
TIIMP201ATUOR
O1FR9C
--
-ACROSS
WALL(OF)
InW
Ii
7-7-T.
2 X( 0.7 %X0.50
I
0.59
Ini
W
(1vW)
2(1 -a1
l1,0
-V
--
From
Equations 51,
rb/of
-25,000
=-
ti'
--. 0070
+a.
Ib/inO
~aF~cinofWl ~cn~
FromUII
23,vk~Srs~
Equt.o
'82
LE
-6950-b/i
10
-Nc~~~~~EUPLM
-WS
-.
(1,4
1e
~~
~
-
l',,pe~t~reDitaucefo
a h~eru(I~essreof
P1149111111Wente1ivndeig1ano
eintrolaned
Rat. Foprar Disamplefra
g iv ewn: Pesueo
,,0
p-4500 s
..-
2.07eiemayhn accegrptable.
oflightly
sallrthis-
nkon atms
inepltd.Freaplgvn
--
'.1
limit
V-9K
N
-
-.
WO
-
KOCO
-0
c. Recoilless Guns
---
00
lLIwdsST
-
0,
07.
UML947 Ptass
NO0 M0 400
500 000
?O 350_ 000
IRN1O1w WP311I AMU0 WAL.I6F)
WO
FlIGURE~ 39. Equivalent Stress aa a Fwmcton of Wall Thickrneuss-Ratilo and Teniperaltire Distance for an Internal Preeeure of
b. ArtillerM
112. Artill~y tubes are designed on pressurestresses alone. Thermal stresses not being considered, the equivalent stress is based on the yield
strength modified by a small factor of safety. The
wall thicknesses along the tube length are governed
by a computed design pressure-travel curve h
maximum pressure determin'es the tube wall thicknesw from the breech to the point of maxim'urn
pressure on the pressure-travel curve. The wall
thicknesses of the remaining length of the tube are
determined from the maximum value of the cornputed design pressures, p, corresponding to thevarious positions. The design pressure-travel curve
is a composite of two pressure-travel curves of dif-I
ferent shapes. It represents the values of either
curve, whichever is mnaximum at the particular
M0
-T
1.-10000\_
KO~OOt-
---
--
not considered relevant here. At this stage, a material advantage is achieved if the tube designer
O
oec-
--
TTLCUAKTVS
0000iu0
=z
__?_=
48
inannn
;-~ 1.6-dnl
rnnfnr~l
--T--
rif fth0
00N
sswMAUN~ aupzINcE
7060SO00
ACROSS
WALL
("I
80,000 psi.
0Thi, practice
50
40
16
--
-__
PRESSURE
DEmOS
30
20
1
0
o00
0
WO
W
DISTANCE
FROM V.IPCH 0VJ
300
SO0
...
)Reference
V(W' -+1)
Sp
20.
+1
It
.0
MIMPU
w.
%
PK I 4IN
go
WVM BANSS
7TAVlg..
IIAO
Ij I
*)
10
Is
so
a
0A1,TANC9PFOWM
NI2IL. EXIT
40
00
.
.........
49
.1A
TABLE 10. WALL RATIO-PItESUIRE PATIO CHART FOR MONOBLOC GUN TUBES.
____
-y
-y
0.010
1.0101
0.070
1.0755
0.130
1.1513
0.100
1.2417
0.0,1
1.0111
0.071
1.0767
0.131
1.1527
0.191
1.2434
0.012
0.013
1.0122
1.0132
0.072
0.073
1.0779
1.0790
0.132
0.133
1.1541
1,1555
0.192
0.193
1.2451
1.2408
0.014
0.01
1.0142
1.0153
0.074
0.075
1.0802
1.0814
0.134
0.136
1.1569
1.15M3
0,194
0.195
1.2485
1.2502
0.016
0.017
0.018
1.0163
1.0173
1.01
0.076
0.,077
0.078
1.0826
1.0838
1.0849
0.136
0.137
0.138
1.1506
1.1610
1.1624
0.196
0.197
0.198
1.2518
1.2535
1.2552
1.1638
0.1909
1.250
0.020
0.021
0.022
0.023
101204
1.0215
1.0225
1.0236
0.080
0.081
0.082
0.083
1.0873
1.0885
1.0897
1.0910
0.140
0.141
0.142
0.143
1.1052
1.168o
1.1680
1,1605
0.200
0,210
0,220
0,230
1.2586
1.2701
1.2942
1.3131
0.024
1.0246
0.084
1.0922
0,144
1.1710
0.240
1.3328
0.026
0.027
i.01267
1.0278
0.086
0.087
1.0946
1.0958
0.146
0.147
1.1738
1.1753
0.260
0.270
1.3747
1.3971
0.028
1.0288
0.088
1.0971
0.148
1.1767
0.280
1.4205
0.029
1.0299
0.089
1.0983
0.149
1.1782
0.290
1.4450
0.030
0.031
1.0300
1.0320
0.09o
0.,01
1.0995
1.1007
0.150
0.151
1.179
1.1811
0.300
0.310
1.4709
1.490
0.082
0.033
0.034
1.0331
1.0342
1.0352
0.092
0.093
0.094
1,1020
1.1032
1.1045
0.152
0.153
0.154
1.1825
1.1840
1.1855
0.320
0.330
0.340
1.5267
1.5571
1.5892
0.038
1.0363
0.09o
11056
0.155
1.1870
0,350
1.6234
0.086
0.037
0.C88
0.039
1.0374
1.0385
1.0395
1.0406
0.096
0.097
0.098
0.099
1.1089
1,1082
1,1094
1.1107
0.16
0.157
.0.158
0.159
1.1884
1.1899
1.1914
1.1928
0.360
0.370
0.380
0.390
1.6599
1,6989
1,7408
1.7850
0.040
0.041
0.042
0.043
0.044
0.045
0.046
WWI
0.048
0.049
1.0417
1.0428
1,0430
1.0450
1,0461
1,0472
1,0482
1.0493
1.0564
1.0515
0.100
0,101
0,102
0.103
0,104
0,105
0.106
0.107
0.108
0,109
1.1110
1.1132
1,1145
1.1157
1.1170
1,1183
1.1196
1.1209
1.1221
1.1234
0.160
0.161
0.162
0.163
0.164
0.165
0.166
0.167
0.168
0.169
1.1943
1.1958
1.1974
1.1989
1.2004
1.2020
1.203W5
1.2050
1.2065
1.2081
0.400
0.410
0.420
0.430
0.440
0.450
0.460
0.470
0.480
0.490
1.8347
1.8878
1,9457
2.0004
2.0800
2, 185
2.2469)
2.3472
2.4628
2,5976
0.050
0,081
0,052
0,053
0.054
0,055
0.086
0,057
0,058
0.059
1.0526
1.0537
1.0549
1.0560
1.0571
1.0Lo3
1.0594
1.0605
1.0616
1.0628
0.110
0,111
0,112
0.113
0.11.1
0,115
0,116
0.117
0,118
0,119
1.1247
1.1260
1.1273
1.1286
1.1290
1.1313
1.1326
1.1339
1.1352
1.1365
0.170
0,171
0.172
0.171
0.174
0.175
0.176
0.177
0.178
0.179
1.2096
1.2112
1.2127
1.2143
1.2159
1.2174
1,2190
1,2206
1.2222
1.2237
0.500
0.510
0.520
(1.5.10
0.540
0.550
0.560
0.570
0.580
2.7578
2,9524
3,1960
3.5134
3.9512
4.6116
5,7824
8.8720
0.060
0.061
0.062
0.063
0.064
0.065
0.066
0.067
0.068
0.069
1.0639
1.0651
1,0662
1.0674
1.0685
1.0697
1.0700
1,0720
1.0732
1,0743
0,120
0.121
0.122
0.123
0,124
0.125
n. 126
0.12l
0.128
0,129
1.1378
1.1392
1.1405
1.1419
1.1432
1.1446
1.1459
1.1473
1.1486
1.1500
0.180
0.181
0.182
0.1O3
0.184
0.185
0.186
0,187
0.188
0.189
1.2253
1.22609
1,2286
1,2302
1.2310
1.2335
1,2351
1.2368
1,2384
1.2400
0.019
0.025
1.0194
1.0257
0.079
0.085
soS
1.0861
1.0934
0.139
0.145
1.1724
0.250
1.,3533
21 !'J(onfideiwe
1 -.
9, R
)_P_
~(5c
TV(55)
PIMP
where
IV = wall ratio
p
S'I
,
of
eA.
s,,,
t,.ablishes a 9i9.8 percent
Ievel for the presnure variation, bift since
the upper level promotes greater safety in the de.
bec~omesA,.',
ARMA
sign, only the plus variation is t u
The vahi,
jo.
-A70o) + 3ujop
(56b)
1.05 NOP +
'
where
1.05
Ap/AT
TA
F
For final tube design, by definition:
ESPh., = S, X PIMP
(560)
where
St - factor of safety.
factor of safety found to be satisfactory in recoilless gun design is 1.15.
e(55)
115.
(55e)
(I
where
N = number of rounds
P - recorded pressure of each of N rounds
P = NOP
D.-
DW.
(56d)
where
D,
W.
-.
."
."
:at"
a..
..
it."
n-..
In
corivent,-1yip
l0t4'erilles Iifi wvall ratit) foiind in Taleh, I)
cedurv' di i lot Iinake anl,)wranv for st
uitd, suhseuiei'tly, the oWNtsiih, dimete'r. No allowtration at (is'oi1ti1101titis sti(i 1.0 i i the, region where
verstrengt~h
i
nice is made for ecccitrivity as Ott,
barrel joins chamtisr, hencev, it shouhld h used only
of (he wail mor, than (ompl)ensa~tes for nmatufacturin regions unaffetd by stmriss raimsrs.
Additional.
1,11( 011sidW
r.'11at10.'1141,;M
H"Ll'rII'I)C:
PMMP
(586f
aep
(56g)
1.15 PIMP
4. Determine
temperature
degradation
the
strength ofdata,
yield
the degraded
or estimate from
te
oreimater,
g t
Table 10.correspon
6. obputain Wfrom//
6. Obtain W from Table 10 corresponding to
7. Convert to apparent wall ratio by Equa..
tion 55e.
8. Calculate minimum outside diameter from
Equation 56d.
116. The test weapon from which firing data are
established has a much thicker wall than either the
preliminary or the final tube in order to provide a
tube of unquestionable safety. The wall thickness
is derived by arbitrarily increasing the design pres2 CMP, The resulting plY
sure, usually to P
52
optimum weight
(56e)
0
PIMP - 1.05 CMP + A (T, - 70 F) +
AT
sMl'iUCC
argurment is silitantial'd ini pargrraph 107 IIo'vever, thf, Kail is. slighit and th posiiP(M.ilily of (Ili-continuities introd'cing stress concnUtrations pr-e-
vails, and inldicates that. dh slightly mrconsre rvativ, approach applied to the barrel wall also should
bh applicd to the chamber wall.
117 D)esign data drawings are prepared for each
prototype receilless gun designed, a typical example
of which is shown in Figure 42 for a hypothetical
RING-
TUBEt
4/
r'7
rT
2z'
rs
,
r
Ad
Et'r
El
FGUEI
(57b)
The laminated structure is influenced by the individual properties of Region 2 and the ring. Their
respective moduli of elasticity are modified to be
CoN19CNION
1
Definitions of Symbols
moduli of elasticity of tube and ring
-- equialent modulus of elasticity of
combined section
M 4 , Ma - moment per unit circumference at
Stations 4, 5
- internal pressure
p
- shrink fit pressure
p,
- shear per unit circumference at Sta,
Q3
Q4
tions 4, 5
ra, r2, rl = mean radii Region 1, 2, 3 of tube
E, E,
E,
r,
Ar
t,, ta,
i,
,
6A,&
04, 65
VPr
P, - E10
E, - E'1(1 - )(57e)
(57d)
flexural rigidity
1
1 ]''(57c)
"Reference 22.
o4
os
(570
e
g57u
E.t. - Et, -- E,t,
are approximate but the error is small enough to be
negligible. The flexural rigidity for the equivalent
region is
Bid + Ar,t4
+ t~(57h)
?
2~R, 4l4 + 6
D. - '
+12(
+
-t S,)
53
.t .. ..
voiii mul(region
is denloted
(57i)
where
- (,.P! + .,R,t,)2
(PI; +-,"
+
,
-
(57j)
0,
For Region
4at Station
Pe +
64
Q.,M
2XD,
=Elk
(57k)
058b)
and is given by
(57k)
8C
(rr77
2X, l, - Q,
amnatd
m)
h
b o e h icc.,r
Tea)),sr.ssaeioiiewe
43 will
in Figurestructure
as represented
andthemoment
shear
of the laminated
inside radius
increase
(57n)
L.
"EI
t.,
OMA.
20 D.
Elt
2#AI + Q4
,--
o it v
(,58d)
h n tesl
e sl
nn
(57p)
4M -
The two components of the equivalent section funetion as a unit under shear and bending particularly
since an initial interference exists between them,
Ee\
1
H =
fRt
+ Rj)
(t8,
At Station .5,
5"
-~t
aE,,- .
2~t
F1,'
+
20 2 .(17i)1r(t
Rt'+?,)(IvRl.
+5r
+
(5g
1258g)+ n,
The three components of stress in Regioni 2 and
the gimbal ring may now be computed, The axial
(M-7 s) stress produced by the moment is
2~~'iii.~M
2#M 5 + Q5
PE,4)
~2MD + At)++'+BC
(57t,)
D+L
+
24,D.(58h)
119. The shear and moment values are obtained
where At is the distance from the interface of the
eq'iating the two expressions for deflections at
ring and tube to the point in question and is assumed
each side of the discontinuity and solving for Q positive when measured outward from the interface.
and M from the two pairs of simultaneous equations.
The tangential stress produced by the moment is
Since general solution.- are awkward, the substitution
of numerical values will result in equations which
U1y.
P'O*
(58i)
are much easier to handle, After the values for shear,
and the tangential stress produced by the radial
*
Sby
++R,
54
:;il ly is
.... ....
8.
6,.)
E'(6
where 5,6is the
t!LL-
(.58k)
V2
-(t,
E,=
e o internal pressure at irFIU
h,
0, = -P=r
- -(p,
+ 7'.)
( 5 8 p)
(,8q)
i..
~7-,r,4,
2 r'
*
Again,
since the maximum equivalent stress may
0 + PI)
2\-
a
and at Station 2
%
SCtil
(59a)
,mical
uain
el
olat
a, -p(580
iii.
4
a
ioylI
(S5ec)ti
D,, D,
C
C,
C1
=-
12?2
tanl)
-+L
E
E,l
(0d
(500)
05 f)
55
2X
....
'.J.
4 -,Q
V"
2X
,,
(C.
,- O +(c,+....+ ,,,
Ssolved
on
SMat
I
I/
FOMEO
D
5,
_____
Definition of Symbols
= projected area of nozzle
A.
= flexural rigidity of sections indicated
De, D,
defined by Equation 57l)
II
-- modithis of elasticity
moduus o elstiet~yiv.
M,, Al. " rnit moments at Stations c and n
design pressures at Stations c, n, o
pV,p,, pp
= design pressure at nozzle throat
Q0, Q.
unit shear at Station c and n
,
,
mean radii at Stations c, n, o
r,
= radius of nozzle throat
t,, t,, 1, = wall thickness at, Stations c, n, o
a
= angle of nozzle slope
for indicated
defined by Elquation Me7c
,, X,
sections
V
Poisson's ratio
!
-The
angular deflevtions at. Sections 2 and 1, respectively,
are
+-
+,
Q1
(,59k)
Q
.
-1
(C2
=.E
ID__
NDOMA
.
2_1,
+
-Q
CL
Q2
-CM,
'
___IC
which is estimated by assuming a straight line variation of radial deflection over a short distance. There* Refeienre
23. Formula
2t
)Drived from
for s8 of Case 3 on page 269 of
Reference 24.
(c
\
CMA = 0
/
+ -
+6D,
;\
591)
,Combined
enee 24.
m56
"
i~
ilthe
-'hen assnming
t.
to
E c's(4.
".-
I"&yjl
2N.41. +
,,o
Q,n
r.-
the end
of
x. are the
where x. and
C, the
Station
and 0. Atfrom
n distances
nozzle to Stations
---
)Yk
MT
CENTER OF
radial deflection
2)
-(60d)
and
displacement
to a uniformThe
angular
jected
onlydeflections.
angular
displacement
to radial
analysis follows the procedure developed for a ring
whose width is large in comparison with its mean
S=
(60e)
.where
smaue
ihrdrcinady
whr
where
y -
Y .
AF -r .A
= cArAy m Ee r ry
(60ff)
(60i)
rmoeo
(60)
er A
(60k)
(60g)
where
ff the mean radius of the section.
MT =
f Le
y ! rAy
(60h)
X.'-AFZ -
ir'r, Arpp,
(60m)
57
"YC
M,
M. + M,(60s)
Mr -- MH + M. - M. +yMQ +y.Q.
a-a
""''T~
T
CENTER O
)NOTATONP
A0O~~
E--
F.pletes
s.oar
..
AF.
(60n)
Z A1F,
Figure
By balancing the axial pressure forces in
47, the axial force at the cylinder joint
P. - F. - P.
(60p)
where
F.
Ay,
(60r)
width of increment
,0v)
EA
f1Q)
where
A - Zr ly, the cross-sectional areas
At the nozzle, the radial deflection
. y.0 + f(P"Q EA
-.
(60v)
where
y, -distance
(60~t)
Saxis
e- e
.. o.
(60x)
Direct substitution for 0. and 6, in Equations 60b
and 60d puts these equations in terms of unit moment and shear. Radial deflection, 6,, is eliminated
by equating its expressions in Equations 60a and
60w, and 5, by equating its expressions in 6Oe and
60v. This manipulation provides four equations with
four unknowns, M,, M., Q,, Q,, for which values
may be obtained by simultaneous solutions. After
deflections become available, primary stresses may
be computed from Equations 58a to 58d and then
the equivalent stress of Equation 23.
v. Nozzle Stresses
124.
I
[
58
T,
mor dip..l
st.res,.e
(61a)
+( )-TI+
(61b)
Similarly
--
Definition of Symbols
A
-p.
(61e)
- +
'F
I'.urn the same
axial and
thr,"obtain
tag nt table,
stress
obtain p/p.. The
Theaxiale
11 2
(ld)
2tr
sin ,
n
rP
(61e)
(61h)
2r +
9 t
(610.
9
Ordinarily, the nozzle wall so obtained for high
26.
t Reference
Reference 27.
t Reference 26.
59
IV - IVr + 1,
a. Jacketed Construction
, (uj
!-
vo.)
(62a)
6 Dr-----A'
D e,
(62 b )
D
=]D
EL
(62c)
601
D'"I
2
D,Do
p.D' - pDi + -. r-(p,-
+
where
D, D, D2 D. =
.!
- (pD- p)
p)
(62f)
ID of liner
O) of liner, ID of inner jacket
OD of liner jacket, ID of outer jacket
OD of outer jacket
0, D, =
(03b)
[D+
+
P.2,
p.
0, D
- D2 .
O ED'.
p",D + --
D(62e)
Substituting for t,
D o,
(62d)
D - DP
D'-
O)
D(
i)+D(
Ia)
(0)
1= - 6"' + a,,
(63e)
- - 6, + 61,
=2
.Au.rtea%,,
b1.
Autofrettage2
(6.3 f)
Y In D
(64a)
where
+ p
(5c)
-j_"c
Y - (P, - P.)
(65d)
This shows that the tube will be safe for all working
pressures which do not exceed p/
128. When autofrettage is performed by applying
a constant hydrostatic
pressure along the
full length
the
mstb
peof the bore, the outside of the tube must be prevented from straining beyond the yield point. Even
the thickest part of the tube should be restrained
as a safety measure. The restraining cylinder is
called a container. Clearance between container and
and tube should be so arranged that the outer surface of the tube is on the verge of yielding at autorettage pressure. Since the container induces extemal pressure on the tube, both internal and exteral pressures must be included in the analysis.
Based on the Maximum-Shear-Stress Theory Y 2r.,t where r. is the allowable stress of the material
in shear, and is equal to J(o, - a,). Substituting
for r.
and
(66b)
aY In r + C
where r is the general term for radius and C is a
constant of integration, whose value is determined
(64b)
u,
and
,
Y In r
(66d)
YIn
(65a)
6)
Y In
-p.
-Pt.
(66)
61
"0
A
I
The tube wall thicknes:4 is determined fromn Equation 64d. The effective aut~nfr.ttanwVr,.,,
(67)
Substituting for a, from Equation 66a into Equation 66e, the tensile stress at any point in the tube
wall after autofrettage pressure is fully applied
)D-.
(a)
-corresponding
When D - D,,
(68b)
Y - p.
(69a)
1 W .i
(1 b)
6.
(69e)
4
D.
4 ,430D
(71a)
where
0 - shear modulus
A - ID of tube and nominal diameter of mandrel
The deflection of the mandrel
D, (pensation.
Reference 28, Equation 8.82.
62
(71c)
.:r',n.
,1.....-.n,-,
Awilehll,
to e-tHablish firm
(]esign
the
or not strain
comnmptiwati ii
interference
is
E(b' - a')(c'-
i.
AT' "
I. LINER DESIGN
132, Where liners are designed solely for the purpose of prolonging tube life, strength is secondary,
However, these liners must he strong enough to
develop and transmit the rifling torque afnd to withstand the collapsing pressure of shrink fit. Such
liners if made only as thick as required for machining
and handling are generally adequate to transmit
torque and, being thin and therefore less rigid, have
the inherent advantage of developing low shrink
fit pressures. For example, the liner for the 7.62 mm
b')
(7a)
- am)
where
a
inner radius of assembly
b = intermediate radius of assembly
c = outer radius of assembly
6 = total radial deflection at intexface,
If 'he mating tubes have different modulii of
elav.ieity, the shrink fit pressure becomes
.
-
+ bV +
+
+ 1 Q2b'+a'
+
a, -
(73b)
where
Ej - modulus of elasticity of jacket
EL = modulus of elasticity of liner
pi - Poisson's ratio of jacket
pi, = Poisson's ratio of liner
Once the shrink fit pressures become known,
resultant stresses throughout the composite wall can
be computed by applying the appropriate method.
A sample calculation demonstrating the procedures
appears in Chapter 8, Part C.
J QUASI TWO-P!tCI TUD
134. The quasi two-piece tube (Figure 4) represents a small arms lined tube which aptly illustrates
the advantages of the lined type. Not only does the
liner prolong tube life, but the shrink fitted memberg
increase the strength while the arrangement of the
structural components inhibits extreme temperatures at the chamber. Referring to Figure 4, gaps
at A and D, the ends of the liner and cap, respee.
tively, are arranged so that a positive seal material.
izes at B, between liner and tube, and at C, between cap and liner. Further benefit is derived
from the gap at D. Since the hottest region of the
tube is near the forward end of the liner, heat flows
from here in either direction. As it reaches the gap,
D, the rearward flow to the cap is interrupted,
thereby inducing the temperature drop which may
be observed in Figure 9. The comparatively cool
chamber wall relieves two sources of trouble. One,
t Reference. 25, page 242.
63
-.-
,-.,-
......
',i
'.
.tn.
__1.
Threads
13:6.
___............ ___-__-_.............
the
shear stress
(74)
where
weber
L - liner length
AT -change in temperatures
a,, - coefficient of linear expansion of liner
a,coefflieient of linear expaision of tube,
Present practice hat;
AT - 1000*F
a, - a, - 5 X 10- in/in/*F when liner is
stellite and tube is steel
dliameter of the thru, d. Eliminating the p:pauc lbetween. the threads, only half the length of the engaged threads can he considered, The shear stress
lbeomns
(75)
F
jrD~h
where
D.
F
L
ing that only one thread carries the full load. Shear
and bearing stresses determirne the feasibility of the
design.
K MgC3IANICAL I'3ATURg$
138.
Refer4W'e I0,
64
Wi VME TREAD
1)
W4
WI1)
TRA
THRAD
I
IEsS
INTERRUPTED THREADS
'-
F, = p.r
-..
-- BREECH
BLOCK
........
... .... ... o. ......
X m
.....
, .. p .....
D.
(70)
where
D, = rear chamber diameter or equivalent
F, - thread load
por = maximum propellant gas pressure
139. Threaded joints in the chamber of recoilless
tubes are designed on the basis of a Watertown
Arsenal IAboratory method which assigns the maximunw load on any one thread as one hMf the total
load.* Stress concentrations at the root of the threads
are emphasized. Four stresses are involved: the di-
A PO
BREECH RING
FIGURE 51. Interrupted Threads.
=
=-;
- 2
F.(7c
F7 --
0",-C
(77b)
2.
P,
Fr
-pdirect bearing stress
2r
Reference 31.
t References 32 and 33.
2F.
(77d)
IA
(al JOINTDETAIL
.. ,FIGURE
It
OvItZZE
M) TREAO DETAIL
'have
CIN
3. Muzzle Attachments
142. Muzzle attachments comprise muzzle brakes,
3
3k,
F(77e
(77e)
S-L
(7Oa)
iL
-
"h
(7
(79b)
where
h - depth of keyway
L
length of key
- thickness of key
141. Recoilless tubes exert, littie or no external
forces. Both recoil force and generally rifling torque
are balanced by the nozzle discharge. Therefore,
supporting structures need only the rigidity and
strength necessary to support the weight and hold
the gun firmly in firing position. Light clamps or
rings around the tube or lugs integral with the
chamber provide attachments for the supports.
Pas of handling rather than strength becomes the
66
I1
FI(MUiJU
1,,.0
--
ec
--
oc
atgr
FI(URE 55
of0
gun
tues
,, T
."
,,
lolsteh1
67
Mn
P(Max)
S(Max)
Si
Cr
-...
Mo
ORDl 1052
ORD !1155 Re'S'
0.47-0.55
0.5i0-0.62
i1.20-1.50'
1.30-1.65
0.40
0.40
0(Us
0,05-00()
0.20-0.35
0.20-0,35
ORD 41fiG
OR4D 4150 ItemS*
0.4"-4.55
0.47-0.55
0.75-i .ff
0.70-1.00
0.00-0.11(0
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.04
0.05-4).00
0.04
0.204).3$b
0.20--0.35
0.20-0.35
0.W01,10
0,15-0.25
0.80-1,15
0.15-0.25
0.80-1,16
9,30--0.40
0.75-1.00
0.40
1.40-1.70
0.o-1.10
-oV0,41-0.40
0.20-0.30
t,-tD 4330V
(Mod + Silt
0.30-0.35
)0.40-0.00 0108-0.12
,.
--
--
-properties
---
,,\
WP,,
no
-some
Io,.w
NNmedia.
?110" ,creasing
FIGURE 50. ENfects of Tempering Temperature on Tensile
68
.,,
4t.b
E
0
Average
Average
ft-lb.
Trai.
Long
Trann.
Long
Trans.
Long
Trans.
Long
27
25
23
21
39
38
38
37
18
17
16
15
30
29
29
29
12
11
10
10
25
23
21
19
8
8
7
7
21
20
18
16
20
20
20
37
36
36
3
35
35
35
34
34
34
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
29
28
28
27
27
27
27
26
26
26
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
17
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
14
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
10
10
15
15
7
7
12
12
160
1
170
175
180
185
190
b20
200
205
210
215
220
225
230
20
20
20
20
20
20
The upper limit in each range Isone les than the lower limit In the sueoedlng ranse, e.g.,180-184, NO.
.)
--
-"-
c---
,,
-:
mks fold,
a- Is1" 1
140
.I1YU
-0
IN-
9w.gvwe
69
1'4
"m
MSEI--
-PE
vinllilll~l
%.-S
Uwe
-;.
I
0
ni
'40
vtih~
sot
YIELD
lowI1
ail --
4#I~
--
a0
-i
10 a W
'M,
W woo
"""o
suplingadheen
muain
stha
FIGURE 60. Effects of Temperature an Strength of Titanium
lloy.
Allo.-
and bore. in nozzles where gas velocities are considerably higher, titar.lum surfaces wear away
rapidly. However, the protection offered by thin
steel liners inhibits rapid erosion thereby converting
the otherwise vulnerable titanium nozzle to one as
effective as steel.
148. The chemical composition of titanium alloys
should be selected and specified to meet physical
Tube
OD
(in)
50
100
150
200
250
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
96
1.32
2.88
4,43
8.63
12.75
24.00
2.12
2.03
1,93
1.84
1.76
1.71
1.64
2.48
2.38
2.27
2.16
2.06
2.01
1.93
2.76
2.65
2.52
2.41
2.29
2.24
2.15
3.10
2.98
2.85
2.72
2.60
2.5
2.45
3.41
3.29
3.14
3.01
2.89
2.82
2.72
3.75
3.62
3.47
3.33
3.20
3.13
3.03
4.47
4.33
4.18
4.02
3.88
3.83
3.70
5.30
5.16
4.99
4.83
4.68
4.61
4.48
6.21
6.07
5.89
8.72
5.57
5.50
5.37
7.25
7.11
6.92
6.76
6.60
6.52
6.39
8.40
8.25
8.07
7.89
7.73
9.73
9.57
9.38
9.21
9.05
8.98
8.83
1.,20
11.04
10.95
10.66
10.50
10.42
10.28
12,81
12.65
12.46
12.27
12.10
12.03
11.90
14.65
14.48
14.28
14.09
13.93
13.84
13.70
Marmiu
36. pap 179.
7.T5
7.52
e-1
70
ait
___rT_-"_
Ave
Yield Strength
(0.10% offset) Elongation
%
1000 psi
120
13,
140
14
12
14O11
4. Plastics
150. As gun tube nmaterial, plastics, in their present
state, are in 'the same category as aluminum, i.e.,
restricted to special applications such as the expendable tube. Plastics have poor retention of strength at
moderately high temperatures but improve hi this
respect when reinforced with fibrous glass. At least
one sporting gun currently on the market Las a fiberglass barrel with a steel liner. Others are in the
experimental stage. However, no data are available
on their ability to withsti0nd the high temperatures
generated by prolonged, rapid fire.
In general, fiberglass reinforced plastics, RP,
offer many advantages that may be applied to gun
180
10
170
180
190
200
8
8
77
___-__-_
Ave
Ave V-notch
Iteditction
of Area
%
Charpy Impact
(-40F)
ft-lb
29
26
15
12
23
11
21
18
18
10
8
8
7
16
14
13
210
oh mnp
is one less than the lower limit In the
Tuc pper
, 120,000
to 12910,0.
rs.eelimits,in
radnp.
Material
Specific
Gravity
op. gr.
Mod of Elasticity
B X 10-' psi
Actual
Tensile Str.
psi
Specific Str.'
TS/up. gr. psi
FRP
Aluminum
1.9
2.7
5.7
9.7
152,000.
81,000,
80,000.
30,000.
Titanium
Steel
4.8
8.0
16.2
29.0
126,000.
240,000.
28,m0.
30,000.
71
70400
70400
70-1000
*dwa..
X..
x iu
pr
eF F
Temp. Itange
7F
a X 101
per F
7.A
7.96
5.18
70-1500
70-1600
70-1800
8.68
8.72
8.D0
4W.
0.22% C,
0.66% Mn
62.2% Co,
5.5% Mo
27.4% Cr,
2.8% Ni
0.70% Fe
0.53% Si
5. Stefll
151. Of the various high temperature resistant
masterials tested for small arms tube liners, Stellite
has the best prerties. Because of its high melting
point and resistance to rosion, more rounds can
be Jired at faster rates than with other materials.
Stellite 21 (MIL-C-13358) is the liner material curgently being used. Although Stellite is brittle at
ambient temperatures, the steel tube cover prevents
expansion and reulting failure. At high temperaturns, the mechanical properties of Stellite are
ideally suited for liners. Tensile strength ranges
from 120,000 pai at 70*F to 33,000 psi at 1800*F.
Ductility improves with increase in temperature.
Blank liners are received as tubular castings which
are precision machined to fit the tube. Stellite liners
am restrited to short legths primarily because of
6. Chromium
152, Of the various metals plated to the surface
of gun bores chromium was found superior to
molybdenum, tungsten, tantalum, nickel, cobalt
and coppert. The melting points of nickel, cobalt
and copper are too low. Of the remainhig, only
chromium can be electr-deposited readily. Alloys
of molybdenum and tungsten have been deposited
on bore surfaces but low-hardness and uncertain
adhesion make them inferior to chromium. This
leaves chromium as the only metal that can be
electrodepocited and can approach the chemical
* efere 39.
t Reference 40, page 5,
Temp.
OF
A
A
a
BRom
1000
l0o
100
A
R
b
H
D
A
A
72
100
1300
180
1600
1700
lo
lEMO
UT(8
100D poi
i01.3
69.1
86.2
74.2
89.3
79.3
59,0
41.6
42.8
33.3
32.0
1. A: am cast,
Y'S
10 puI
82.3
39.1
74.4
38.0
71.3
61.5
49.0
32.8
-
B: 1350"F, 50 hr.
Elong,
%
8,2
16.4
1.2
5.7
2.0
3,8
6.8
19.3
27,0
35.0
49.0
C: 1700F, 16 hr.
Red Aremi
%
9,0
25.3
4.3
36,0
6.0
8.0
19.7
23.2
52.4
5824
63.1
E
106 pat
36.0
33.0
35.0
33.7
23.9
24.2
16.8
15.4
-
Artillrv
1lerioillumm
Small Arms
Exterior
125-250
Dore
Groovwm
8-16
16-32
63-250
16
16
63
32
32
Chamber
32
32
32
Breech ThreadR
16
16
32
32
Sliding
Shrink Fit
16-32
03
63
M. MAHTUFACTURINO PROCEDURES
153. The procedure for manufacturing gun tubes
follows normal machine shop activity of tuning,
grinding, boring, honing, and broaching arranged
in well-established, sequential order. However, the
operations are unique in their application. Gun tubes,
because of their large slenderness ratio, require considerable care in maintaining concentricities and
alignments. Inspections and tube -traightening follow each series of machining operations to insure
the two recuirements. Surface finishes and tolerances, particularly in tho bore, are demanding.
i)
73
....
I
I
CHAPTER 7
MAINTENANCE
A. CORROSION INHIBITORS
Preventive maintenance begins at the corn-
f~twhile
h iwon
of the bore
sesnilfo
i157.evc
diligent inspection
Frequent,
155.
74
CHAPTER 8
SAMPLE PROBLEMS
The equivalent stress in this problem must not
wall
ACUA Cc~
W
wall ratio.
p. - design p."ssure
p-1.05
(81)
amf "awo~a
....
NO..
us)
FIGURE 61. Daign Data, Mouobkc ArU4" TuNs.
75
IDist,
From
W
1),
(in.)
1o
(il.)
.483
.483
.483
.483
.483
.431
2.501
2.50
2.50M
2.01
2.503
2.016
0.00
4.80
4.20
3.94
3.94
3.94
15.02
12.01
10.51
9.86
9.86
7.94
1.575
1.M88
1.288
1.217
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
1.175
1.145
1.105
1.075
1.058
1.053
p*
(pod)
p/,
0
14
16
20
32
40
72400
72400
72400
72400
72400
6400
W0
s0
70
80
50400
39000
32600
26300
g0
22100
100
120
18900
14200
.336
.266
.217
.175
.147
126
.095
140
160
170
10500
8400
700
.070
.051
.051
1i,
(in.)
1).
(in,)
0
5
5
14
16
20
6.00
5.57
5.57
4.8
4.2
3.94
15.0
15.0
15.4
15.4
15.4
15.4
2.50
2.60
2.76
3.21
3.67
3.91
.483
0.20
5.47
5.07
4.79)
50
90
170
3.94
3.94
3.94
15.4 3.91
8.0 2.03
6.5 1.05
3.94
4.63
3.94
3.94
4.51
4.35
3.94
3.94
3.94
4.24
4.17
4.15
lii W,
Foe
..!.
"1.08
11though
Y
76
Breech
(in.)
X8l'
(p1i)
p
(imi)
Sf*
.500
.520
.534
.539
72400
74400
75000
78000
80100
509D0
72400
72400
72400
72400
72400
72400
1.00
1,03
1.06
).08
1.10
1.11
.53)
.433
.358
80800
64000
53700
72400
72400
72400
1.60
2.93
7.06
11' ESPI/,
.496
t Subinitted
by Watervliet Arsenal.
ratios of tube and jacket are determined, to he followed by the calculations for the elastic strength
pressure (ESP) for each component. The tube shown
in Figure 62 is analyzed to learn whether it can
suatain the prcssurcs at various locations along its
length measured from the breech.
The following are the desiga data at the breech:
Di 6.0 in, inside diameter
AUTOFRETTAOED TUBE.
-
Dist.
From
Breech
(in.)
p,.
81 = 1.05
p - 1.05 p_ - 72,400 psi
----
1.724
D.
(in.)
(in.)
6.0
W1
In Wi
88F
P
(psi)
83800
et
(pia)
60
V1"
1.21
9
140
)
.585
101100 69000 1.46
120800 69000 1.84
.734
.68 150,000 69000 2.17
.931 160,900 G9000 2.83
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
1.795
2.083
2.381
2,538
5
14
16
20
5.57
4.8
4,2
3.94
50
7.75 1.967
.676
170
3.94
6.50 1.65
.501
ued
90
.
D,
160,900 48000
116,800
86600
21000
3.35
5.56
7200 12.0
induce the maximum equivalent stress. By designating the elastic strength pressure as the applied
pressure (p - ESP), the tangential stress at the
inner surface of the liner according to Equation
80b becomes
PSW, + I
The radial stress (Equation 30c) is
163. The next problem i& that of finding the interference necessary for shrink fit and the subsequent
elastic strength pressure when this pressure will
TABLE 21. DESIGN DATA OF THEORETICAL
AUTOFRETTAGED TUBE.
Dist,
From
Breech
(in.)
P.
(psiB) In Wi
W/
Di
(in.)
D.
(in.)
,
EBP
Substitute these expressions in Equation 24 and
replace at, on the assumption that the equivalent
stress will be equal to the elastic limit, and then
solve for ESP. Before proceeding, collect the complex expressions and condense them into simple
terms so the final equations will bU less complicated.
The expressions and their numerical values for the
first trial calculation are
D4 - 6,0 in., ID liner
6900
69000
69M
690
690
40 61500
50
48000
38000
60
70
31000
80
25M00
90
21000
100
18000
120
13500
.10000
140
160
8000
.479
.479
.479
.479
.479
.427
.333
.264
.215
.174
.146
,125
.094
.09
.050
1.114
1.614
1.614
1.614
1.614
1.53
1.395
1.302
1.240
1.190
1.157
1.133
1.099
1,071
1.058
6.0
4.8
4.2
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
9.6
7.75
6.78
6.36
6.36
6.'04
.'50
5.13
4.89
4.69
4.57
4.46
4.33
4.22
4.18
170
.050
).051
3.94
4.14
0
14
103
20
32
7200
____
1.
ma
W s- --
1.323
s -
1o
FIGURE 62. D
I
''
"
Dataseb, ApwilMg
Tu.be.
71.
I]
I
- 7.94 in., OD liner, ID jacket
IV,
-1 r- -n
..
a..
A - "W L - I
w, + I
B M-W1
...
2 .333
C -
1.323
- 0.364T--'--- - 72,450
1.548
_-
I1
1.4 33Ip
- _ )FE
..
-0.364
TW
2 X 8870 X 7.94
.75 X 0.364 X 29.6
10".17n
P-.
F
(PA)
E
E- (W', - 1)F8
(85)
164. Only the interference remains to be determined. It becomes available by stressing the jacket
to the limit as its most critical section, first by solving fc' the shrink fit pressure and then for the shrink
"fitinterference. The total interference normally ha
a spread of 0.003 inch. The maximum interference
is assigned to the analysis involving jacket whereas
the minimum interference is confined to the liner
analysis. Continuing with the numerical value estab-1
E
2-,
0.003 -- 0.014 in
X 10"
< 10
"(83)
ESP, -.
-..
J - C' +- CP + F, - 2.
ESPw "
3w.
H - A -+ 2AR -. 11.525
- 8870 psi
in Equation 85
G- B1 +I B +4 1 =.6.851
ESP,=
- ESP.,)
W' +
--" I:1
F --
- 1.970
p, - F(-
7120 psi
According to Equation 83
8.207 +
/154i - 8.3
69,000 psi8
10
ESP Since this pressure stresses the liner to its limit, the
liner is unable to contain an ESP of 72,400 psi
without suffering permanent damage, therefore, a
larger wall ratio is indicated. For the second trial,
a 10.75 inch outside diameter is selected. The calculations for this section and all succeeding sections
are arranged in sequence in Table 23.
2. Tube With Two j'ackets
....
W '
1
.732pI
3. J
.64
76
-----------
,,.
....
From,
I Br v,e,ch
Di
i),
6.0
8.0
1).
10.75
Ai
sine
11
5.571
8.0
5,571
8,0
10
4.8
8,0
4.2
8.0
11.0
11.0
at-)I
3.94
7.75
3.94
7.75
3.94
8,0
ui
1O.
16
1,94
7.75
3,94
7.75
3.04
,M0o
7.75
9.625
9.625
8.25
W
WL
W,
A
B
C
F
1.792
1.333
1.3
2,287
1.905
1.269
.365
1930
1.436
1L344
1.042
1.734
1.030
.296
1.975
1.436
1.375
1.942
1.680
.997
.307
2,292
1.667
1.373
1.562
1.470
.680
.210
2.619
1.905
1,375
1.38)
1.341
.493
.152
2,792
2,030
1,375
1,320
1.294
.425
.131.
2.792
1.967
1.419
1.349
1.294
.444
.149
2.792
1.967
1,419
1.349
1.294
A444
.149
2.443
1.907
1.242
1.349
1,403
.512
.109
2.443
1.967
1.242
1.31,
1.403
.512
.10C
2,094
1.967
1,065
1,34)
1.591
.630
.040
3A'
B'
C'
F'
AB
CF
15.69
3.63
1,61
.133
4.36
.463
11.31
3.01
1.06
.088
3.37
.305
11.31
2.85
.994
.094
3.28
.306
7.32
2.16
.462
.044
2.30
.143
5.71
1.80
.243
.023
1.85
.075
5.23
1.67
.181
.017
1.71
.056
5.46
1.67
.197
.022
1.75
.060
5,46
1.67
.197
.(22
1.75
.066
40
1,97
.262
.012
1.80
.056
5.46
1.97
.262
.01:.
1.89
.056
5.40
2,53
397
.002
2.15
.025
G
H
J
6.53
11,0
2.21
.017
.020
8900
73400
10400
72400
5.74
8.68
1.453
.017
.020
9900
77300
11600
85100
5.54
8.50
1,304
.017
.020
10200
79200
12100
87700
4.6a
.615
.840
.017
.020
11800
85000
13800
120000
4.14
5.08
.341
.017
.020
12600
88800
14800
160000
3.97
4.74
.254
.017
.020
12800
90300
15100
183000
3.97
4.84
.285
.007
.010
5700
82300
8200
226000
3.97
4.84
.285
.00,3
.006
2450
78300
4900
248000
4.37
5.13
.330
.003
.006
1800
73800
3600
228000
4.37
5.13
.330
.001
.004
600
72400
2400
239000
5.12
8.64
.424
.001
.004
200
66500
900
208000
PaL
ESPL
ESP,
11.0
10.75
5stresses
11.0
11.0
11.0
dimensions below,
A - 10,0 in.
D. - 16.75 in.
W-, - 1,375
D, - 11,67 in,
Do -. 13.75 in,
-
W., -
1,18
1.438
1.218
1.675
p., - 6,780 psi
p., - 3,300 psi
According to Equations 41a and 41h, the liner
at the inner surface are
-
1.36
-2
,
m,
X 3300 X
-53,600
0
2 X 6750 0.89
lb/in'
79
A.
r.
2.36
0.36
0.89
-72,400 lb/in2
a,, - -p
At the int.rfae between liner and inner jacket,
-46,500 lb/in'
0 .361.6
- -3300 - 6750 X 1.39 .- - -7100
0.89
lb/in'
At interface
39
e,230os
87a
6750
j
I72,400
x
,-0
Combine the shrink fit with the pressure stresses
lb/in'
2.48,
Jacketare
6750
.- - 34900 lb/in'
-6800 lb/in'
b/e-42,600
76,00 lb/in'
7100
arm - 0
-49,700 lb/in'
118,400 lb/in'
95,000 lb/in'
- 6M0
-26,200 lb/in'
At- 2.80
At the inner 1surface of the liner, i.e., the bore surfae, We
380
721400 wo
for
380 - 153,000 lb/in'
.- ,,+U
=-020I/n
-2,0l/
1.8
so
- 80,500 lb/in'
- 72,400
16,900 - 21,900
"
100,000 lb/in.
- -Mt9 Iblin'
4.69
0.89
- 3300
a.. - M
lb/in'
42,60 lb/in'
-42,600
w.2
fW, = 1.83
If.s---1.8
0.89
144
X . ,8 .03o-
-=, --7 ,
72,400 .
u,,
m "
-+ 19,400 - 6800
lb|n
- U, 1 + U,, - 850+8000,00
Outer surface of tube~
U,
Uin p+
8f,5W+2,10
CAPTu
186MO/
a. = 149,500 lb/in9
Middle Tube,
Outer Tube,
C136(1.0 _ 0.3)
330
11.6711.7X 3300
29 X 10'(136 - I00)
Since both outer diameter of liner and inner diameter ofthe inner jacket decreased under the masigned
conditions and diametral interference needed between these two members is, according to Equation 63i
0.0083 + 0.0086 - .0169 in.
-tam
x 10" x 900
-..
086 in
r,
r.
P,
B.
S,
8,
(189(1.0 - 0.3)
.
.
- 100) 1
in.
-0.0094
+ 100(1.0 + 0.3)]
caps
13.75 X 6750
29
I.K
rI
X 106(189
c -. re-
.20 in
.375 in
Then Interfiene
I..
-I
*1
"F.......
X 101
+ _ (.025 + .0225
r.00025
.1406 + 0
.25
+.3
v-u
Sr,
oO\.UOZD -.
0,1 M
. Pei
- 6720 1406 + .0625
.1406 - .0625
- .375 in
c - r. - .500 in
30X10'X45XI0"(.1406-
-/J
1re~b
.0225)(.250--.1406)
2X.0527(.250-.0225)
- 7270 pi
2. Shrink Fit Streues
17,50
lb/in'
Note that this stress exists before the cap is assembled. The stress from p,, is the same as for the outer
surface of the liner,
o,,. - -- 11,800 lb/in'
d. Outer Surface of Tube
From p,,, based on first put of Equation 44a
Zr'
We., M -p.,
2 X .0625
" -6720.625
2,0
bI*,
-21,000 lbin
2 X .0625
.1406 - .0625
+ s
rr--
oe25.
248.1406
-7270 .08"-
.0225
-7270
22 X .1406
.
.1406 - .
-17,300
lb/in'
+ ,
.0625 -
.0225
.0625 -
.0225 "
r!rntL2t
-",,--,
-
82
a,..
t.
.....
2 X .1406
-Pa7
.0225
-7270 .1406
.0625 .0625
.1406 +
.0The
- - 1,800 lb/in'
26,000 lb/in'
.1408
250 +
727.250
- .1408
3. Pressure tkrtsmw
formulas for the pressure dtresses are based
on Equation 26.
4I
.250+ .0225
0225
32,000 .250-
38,300 lb/in'
r, r. + 4
-i
.0225
.0625 .250
.250 +
- .0225
- 32,000
"
15,800
lb/in'
"0.
Pd -,r
___
of
r,
r
r.
AT
pd
R
a
8,800 lb/in
6,300 lb/in'
a,
S
The. stresed
for each surface and
stresses arecombined
are combined foreAccording
are listed in Table 24 and plotted in Figure 64. The
total stress
IF ft, + 0,
,-V=,-,,
0S
Strees
_____
..'-,,
6,
0.0
Liner
Inner
Outer
S30
3,240 lb/in'
Part
p. "
+ VI
-21,000
-14,300
dx
R
go
0625
.250 + .1408
---- X .250' - .0625
-35,000
32,400 lb/in'
N
Ut:
-- p
- 35,000
.250 -
.1406
9100
-lb/in'
.250-
,..1406
-17,300
-11,800
38,300
18,800
0
-10,300
Tube
Inner
17,500
-11,800
16,800
21,500
10,800
Cap
Outer
Inner
-10,000
26,000
8,80
8,800
84,800
18,700
6,300
25,o00
Outer
-"
SThe
_-_
71
,
2s
1-
_______________-________.250
C
,000 a"'
i+
3240
r,.
-8,240
1,600 Ib/hin
lb/in'
83
.w~..
*i
3. Thenmal Strim
The temperature variation across the wall is
amumed to be logarithmic althourh therp is
penture discontinuity at the interface. According
to Equation 48a, the tangential thermal stress
-
80 X 7 X 1400h
2(1 - .3).093
.288-
i(
+ 1.78).693]
m21,20D 1b/in!
Flrm Equation 49&, the radial thermal stress
3 X 7 X 1400
2(1 - .3).0-
-32,700
u,
vo
-11,500 ib/"in
1.05 CMP +
42(
AT
700) +
AcAIp
where
20 PsiiOF
-45,000 lb/in'
AT
Acm
In Equation 23,
" 3%
of
CMP
sr,
- 110,200 lb/in'
,33,00
lb/in'
--
#, -- , " -76,700lb/in'
r. - 1.914 X 10*(lb/in')'
Thereime, the total equivalent stress
97,800 lb/in'
t.
This equivalent t
doe not conform to the diseuson of plmgmph 100, indicating that some dimelioalW ohamge. me fmmhmry or a yield strength
Ef 195,000 lb/in' is required.
2. IMCOILLhI GUN*
____
ESI.
- 0.147
Y
1
ibmaittd by 11
snkford Arsenal.
.4
S...............
- 5.615 in
graph 114).
l
1. OUR Tau
an
"Bheasmaed
SPIMP
lb/in"
-11,5M0
Ib/in!
E8P,o,/Y, - 0.0492
W - 1.0515
W. M 1.05
DA - 5.00
31,200 psi
2.5 CMP
. = 0.204
W - 1.265
D. - DW - 4.742 X 1.265 - 6.00 in
As stated in paragraph 116 for economy the test
barrel is con3tructed with a uniform outside diameter anrd no allowance is made for eccentAcity.
After firing the test gun, sufficiently accurate information becomes available to design a prototype tube
according to the method discussed in paragraph 115.
a. Gimbal Ring Analysis
171.
.891
30L
E-
p - 7245 lb/in'
B, - 30 X 10' lb/in'
it - 0.1565 in
rF - 2.429 in
r, - 2.425 in
t -0.148
t -0.178
r, - 2.440 i
, -2.530 in
X 106 lb/i
10
.918
Froma Equations 57f and 57g
2.50,2.478 in
r
2
E~t. - (16.5 X 0
+ 30 X ).068)IO-
D,
7X 1
_3
2065)
+ 007(8.18 + 5.21 + 1.4)1
12(2.45 + 20.66)
12(27,46
'9
105,000
.-
10860
5--7According to Equation 57j
(.0-5
2815-
in
6.14 X 48.1
in
2089
0,003 in
0.83
,.- 0.20
lr - 0.004 in
The bhrink fit
follow.
data
design
The computed
pressure (Equation 57a)
P, ,-,
0.004 X 10'
090 lb/ing
X 10X07.608X10' lb/ih
The Xequivalent (Equation 571i)
~'4
I(0I
1.752 in
.
-5200 I
" V4D,/)
Equating the expresilow for 1&i Equations 57k
and 57n and substitutig for the known values
724 X 5.9.15.
X
X 010'
1,.57246
X6.14
1.89
X1
D = 1214.33
2.08M, - Q, 1W'
62X X9.0 .
-
1.75 2M4 + O
D, -5 .9 X 10' lb-in
Do
D,
XWa2
N - re
,-
2.08/in
X, -2.13/in
1.31Q, - -755
,-
X 2,0aM, - 9,
M,Q, -
.sx io'
.07 X18xi
2x
2 X 4,32 X 5.9 X Ur
N, - 1.94/in
X, - 3.22/in
.8h21
o0
22 lb/in M, -61.1
,
Ibja/j-
8 - .01102 in
F+
Equating the expressions for fia in Equations
and 57r and substituting the known values
,n.,
1.752M, -r O.\ 1
...- '+-
57
~~- 202+ i.
10M -Q@2.425
7245 X 5.95
"16.5
X PO -X -.
178
010 2-X 7.3 X 8.7 X
- M, + 1.942Q, - 922
Equating th, expressions for Os in Equations 57r
and 67t and substituting the known values
10- 8
2 . .94M -where
4
510,
10' .M
.
0 -0742%
Q, - Ui9 lb/in M,
38.5 lb-in/in
, - .01117 in
2,'4
2?
2102O
40W0 X 0.148)]
2
- 986[7.29 + 0.01192(250 - 2320 - r 298)]
- 6400 lb/in?
A - -0.148 in, rneasuuvd inward from
interface
at, - au.- 0.33 X 6400 2100 lb/in'
81,100 lb/in '
MB4, 16.5 X 10' X 0.01192
('7
i
r, =
r,
2.425
a,.
+ a,, - 83,200
-7245 lb/in'
u, - -.
v.
84,400 lb/in'
4020 lb/in
"-"0.0286 in
H =-1 218.52
32.8 X
X 0.037
C
X0,0148
0.148 +- 32.8
8.52 X
3
-2320 lb
12 X 2.487 X 4.82
Suflfeient daU are now available to compute the
stresmse in the members according to Equations U8s
through Sp. Maximum stresses occur at the inner
surface and are tensile except for the radial stresses.
,
At Station 4, tube Region 1, from Equations
58b, 5k 5M,
6 X 01.1
am
u,. - -o 0,33 X
S16..5
IN1
2.429
2.53
2320)]
+ 0.01192 ( 020
1745[-1.75 + 0.01192(2155 - 2320)]
= 1,-5-r
I ,000 Ib/in!
IM0
- 4,9Mlb/in'
X 10 X 0.01192
-81,000
m--600 Wbin'
lb/in'
S58k
-71
q,),
+ (a,
u,), + (w
Analysis of gimbal ring at Station 4, inner surface, when At measured from the interface is zero.
From Equation 58h
828 X 100 -"
0.0286
r -61.0 1
18.8
18.8 X 10'
1
s.-,)'J
-1900
lb/in'
X 10'
8, .
.,-84,300 lb/in'
OOomin
X 90 X 0,O.4
t..
S";"+
IF
, I
nnI
..
.,,,r,I
E,(8_,
_Q
169,000 lb/in2 .
p
2F,
2I5 + 000234)
202.),
30 X 10 (D0.01192
- k,c,
+ P.) - -(3310
+ 690)
-4000 lb/in'
2.53
'"-2320
2.
+ +4020X2 0.063)]
-
1745[-5.60 + 0.01192(2155
-10,600
117,000 lb/in'
2320 + 127)]
lb/in'
173.
A
E
F
C,.)
0.075
4
.,0 3 X 2.8 42600
0.0204
- 131,500 lb/in?
b. Threads
wt -
or,- 3k,
-, 171,500 1b/iu'
The stresses at Station 5 are obtained similarly.
C
d,
p,
r
t
-X
+0.01192 (0.29
::0
129,100 lb/h?
w, -a,,.
0.03
where
a, - 172,3400
34,100 Ib/in'
4260
Fu
C- 2r
1.89X64
- 3310 lb/in'
1.89 X 6.4 + 2.44 X 5.9
I- - -(P
X24260b
2-0.
2K(
IE.. 1 +
- V'
6"5i
+
700
1
(-(I
_0
Reference 32.
t Reference 18.
87
V'. - Xt.1
2.7
11
"b 0.5
- 396 in'
9.
graph 120)
The known data involving the chamber design
174.
are
17.9 in
V-
A,
1.45
lT
V:.-"
r + r~r, - ++r:
~r:)
ir..
At
k7
6.25
T6.815640
-X 10' (8.04
044
-\
W.-~~
I0i
1-46T
-475 in
~2 26.0
0 -475n'-
where
3A48
A,
A,
3.22
11.96
abb- + at-
abVr-
_____12
"n-- br-sin"'
0...)..
_670--- =
-o.0(
in
0
0.00252 in
- T
y\
#
__
12 X 8.04
TO x10'lb
,.
3.17 X 2.83
R-L
.73)
- 1.87r - 6 in'
-ti
EL
M,
a - 0.44 in
b - 2.40 in
r - .44in
The nossle entrance volume increases the chamber
volume to
V, V
88
ol
+ V.-
V~u'
V.475+-481n'
475
+ i'~
6 -481
W
2.5 X 2.83
- 0.61 X 10'
in'/lb
12(l16.5 X 8.
X ~
12 X 0.891
-98,700
lb-in
S,8,700 1-in
X.
Rr f. i.
;,=
3(1
,"-)-
= o-N
'1(
"r6.25
X 0.16
-6460
-1080 lb/in
444 lb-in/in
M,
The radial deflections are computed from Equations 50k and 59m
15640 X 25
16.5 X 6.25
165X
10' X0.40
)+
2 X 1.63 X 98700
-
182
2 X 208 X 98700
0.01570 in
F'.
r, t -.
-
1080
2 X 1.47 X 98700
Do -
E4
12(1
1n0i
0, 3 i
c = 17 X
0.20 "o3
,,i
f.
The tangential stress derived from the radial deflection from Equation 58c
'
3(1
0.109)-
1.018 in
N5.85 X 0.42i
1.408 X 10 lb-In
1.5 X 10'
X
-W277
- 4.28 X 10' lb-in
12(1 - 0.109)
- -)
lb/in'
tion 58b
S444
,6M
112,000 lb/in'
15640 X 10.05
X 10 X 0.40
-
Ba" 16.5
145
2 X 1.20 X 08700
lb/in'
- 0
Q,
-15,60
According to Equation
-3.37Q2
-p
1136
in
1.
=. Vt
10.05 - x 0.16
+ uj = 109,500 lb/in'
-2
4860. X .85
X 16.5 X10' X 0.965
1.018M. + Q.
X 1.058 X 4.28 X 10
(4860 X 5.8)
t.2400 X 6.82
0.652)
)/
0.492
\
"18.5 X 10f X 0.965 X 1.0
Ar, = 0.010 in
_ oV
1.018M. +- Q.lO
+ i-4where
Z, -
0-
9.
Ay. - 0.167 in
y 0. 1.553 in
X
4.28Qo)10-
2 X 0.939M, - Q#
2 X 0.883 X 1,400 X IV
-0.0368 - (4.03M,
From Equation 60d
0.939M. - Q.
2 X 0.828 X 1.406 X 10*
3.895 in
:-
-(7,58M.
r-,()p.
F. - A.p.
- 4.03Q,)10-'
22.9 X 1200
27,500 lb
where
p. - 1200 lb/in', average nozzle pressure (Reference 19)
r. - 3.42 in, exit radius
2.10 in, inner radius at Station .<
The total axial force at the cylinder, Equation 60p
F, - F. - F. -488,500 lb
The distance of the center of pressure from the
axi4, according to Equation 60n is
1 .1 .8
0-7 1
r
Ar -
n
The distance from the neutral axs to Station
y.-2.708 -
-0
. -1.068in-
SA
Au
. . y
51.9 X 0.125
16.83 X 0.125
.09 in
-Ar
r
-
The effects of the pressure on the toroid are determined next. The pressures are obtained for a as
'0
n100
..
3.A1
9in
"
F2,
I')~2rf'
-- F.f,.-.
"6.
tion 6Or. For the same increment as that for the
axial direction
, - -2r Ayp~y,
-97,100 lb-in
lb/in
At. - -4,865 lb-in/in
P - f,, - 0, - -0.004 radian
= -10,170
1Q,
41
-22,300 lb-n/in
+ M, - 2,800 lb-in/in
0,585 X 1O'M
= (1640 + 0.585Mo
1.0680+
0w
3.09(2.419Q - 4.124Q,)
16.5 X 10r X 2.10
"-(1752
(1752 + +0,625M.
0.625M
0.025M.
-0.5
+ 0.689Q, + 0.884,)10"
...
Equating this deflection to that for the nozzle and
collecting terms
1.994Q, + 0.659Q. + 0.508M, + 0.625M, - 988
The radial deflection at c from Equation 60v
A. W1.60 +3.09(9.419Q, - 4.124Q,)
8,- 1.649 +
1.943Q,
-0.809Q,)10"'
3. Nozzle
a. Deegn
176. Two parameters for the nozzle design of the
120 mm recoilless rifle, namely the approach area
and the throat area, have been determined in the
chamber analysis. Other known data are
0, ratio of momentums
15,600 lb/in', stagnation pressure
3.5 in, radius of approach area
1.95 in, throat radius
1.25, ratio of specific heats
90 - 7.529', complement of nozzle
slope
earlier
w p. r. r, -
2.96
.259
1.95
8.67 In
where
a
91
I;
'i.2i
3.440
,,
3.340
1.762
j.712
4.43
90.
- 1.758
37O05'
1.242
1.232
1.188
1.124
.80
2.04
908
,41
.908.,8
1.484
sr,+ Lt. a-
1,405
.1704
.5h
.962
-0
.00
.067
146
.551
.097
-. 0-0
.221
.256
.052
.300
1.123
1,117
0.286
27,200
.276
-,6e7
.581
.118
.625
1.320
1,103
0.591
29,900
.528
.083
.492
.100
.375
1.122
1.116
0.355
42,200
-. 003
.1112
.1128
.023
.165
1.050
1.048
0.160
21,600
1.254'
.
-1.572
1The
-. 022
.1492
.1612
.033
.236
1.082
1.078
0,226
21,700
P.
From Equation 61c,
U-Y
(* )
,.
1.25-
+ ) =0.221
where
r,/r1
- 1.95/1
- 0
F
F.
/
1',124
2.25
At the exit,
A.--"
A,
\r/Y
Reerence 27.
92
F. . 1.242t and
7 1,
P- - 0.1704t
1.124-.
2.548
.0973
AL_(\
A . \/
(I+
1.00
.0628
b. Streasea
The nosule contour is now complete and with a
computed wall thickness, the effective stress may
be computed at each station. Refer to Figure 48 for
illustration. For instance, at Station -1,91, r 2.445. From Equation 61a,
.603
1.00
.0576
-1.11
0
7529'
0
',
.1050
.1050
.02i
.150
1.043
1.042
0.144
22,200
W.
W
4
1.568
.44
0
75'29'
1 Sil
M
3.060
1,000
0
75*20'
p/pM
*
1.050
1,2,54
75029'
ASn
,.
2.445
1.485
F/F,
2.805
Uo
1.762"
3.11
t Reference 27.
150,000 lb/in'
t,)
t . ,r2,00
-' ... 1-.96
"
05,
203 , 0.052
0.0Win
0.2031
150,000
i(A
I,.t,.
W .- .947W,. + 0,053
1.064 + o,053 - 1.117
"Ihzeffective wall thickaeu (Equation 61n)
t. - r(W - 1) - 2.445 X .117 - 0.286
The effective stress now becomes (Equation 019'
15600 x 1lb
27,200 lbii
--.256-Effective stresses at other stations are computed
similarly with all data lhted in Table 25.
"93
/
-...-.----
--...........................-.............
.~
...................
,.-.--...
-..........
'""L"-
:'J'L:[5L""L
GLOSSARY
(In general, terms are defined with specific reference to their use in respect to guns.)
auMo
breechblock. A movable steel block in the mechanism of a breech-loading gun that seals the
breech opening of the tube during firing.
grm.
94
.~.......-..
........
GLOSSARY-(contlflued)J
I
cook-off.
munition caused by the absorption of heat from
ita environment. Usually it consiats of the acnidental and spontaneous discharge of, or explosion
an overheated
caused abyfuze,
firearm,igniting
in, a gun oror barrel
propellant
chamber
pfre
charge.
bursting
charge, or
pert
-16&
--
...
...
. ..
......
OLOSSARY-(continued)
Jacket, bullet.
core. the
combination enmnprainn
sm l
.
.a
mall a .
pressure, computed maximum. (CMP) The maximum pressure computed from interior ballistics
equations, developed in the gun to achieve rated
muzzle velocity during operation at 70*P.
firing mechanism.
06O
o drif96.
GLOSSARY-(continued)
motion of the gun or tube, due to firing. In
recoilless weapons, the residual impulpe between
gun tube and nozzle which may move the gun
rearward or forward. If the impulses balance, no
motion occurs and the gun is tiuly recoilless.
recoil system, double. A recoil system composed
of two complete systems, a primary system and a
secondary system.
recoil system, primary. The system of the double
recoil type which permits recoil of the tube and
its components.
recoil system, secondary. The system of the
double recoil type which permits the top carriage
to recoil.
30 mm.
strain compensation. The pr.ctioe of providing an
interference between projectile and bore to
preclude excessive clearances when the tube
dilates hacause of propellant gas pressure.
stes, allowable working. The maximum stress to
which a structure is intended to be subjected
durg normal performance.
strees con sutration The presence of localized
in a structure, which aeosignflicantly
streess
larger than the stresse existing in immediate
stres, pdnip.
One of three mutually perpendicular stresses on an element which is oriented
such that no shear stress appears on the faces of
the element.
.7
GLOSSARY--(continued)
e-s..,
-irre
u.d._!.a
i W'"'l
tion.
twist,
uWle of.
Stres
dircton.
skeios tha
talm, JaMWeed
tube, moambloc.
material,
tube, mnuldlye
bulongitudinal
tuow, quas two-1ic.
twist, unifom.
.....
.
C)
'p
I_
REFERENCES
1. M. J. Pascual, et al, Trarsient Thermal Stresses
in Gun Tubes, Part II, Watervliet Arsenal Technical Report WVT-RR-6208, May 1962.
2. Gunther Cohn, Cook-off in Aircraft Guns, The
Sources of Energy.*
17. OCM Item 29196, 27 Septembo'r 1945.
18. Seeley and Smith, Advanced Mechanics of Ma.
terials, Second Edition, John Wiley and Sons,
N. Y., 1952.
19. R. A. Strub, Distribution of Mechanical and
Thermal Stresses in Multilayer Cylinders, Transactions ASME, January 1958.
20. C. M. King, The Design of Gun Tubes, Frankford Arsenal Report MR-808, Project T84-4020,
July 1955.
21. A. M. Stott, Simplife Method of Utilising Die.
tortion Energy Concept. for thMe
Design and Stress
Analysis of Tubes and Chambers, Frankford Ar-
3.
4.
5.
6.
Copper Alloys.*
7. ORD-L,784, TN2-805, Study of Pressure Gradiants in Rcoilless Rife Chamber, Aircraft ArnaS
ments, Inc., for Frankford Arsenal, September
1959. (Confidential)
S. J. J. Donnelly and H. H. Kahn, Interior Bal-
1961.
23. ,StressAnalysis Nossle Section, XM-64, Recoillma
Flow, Technik, Inc., Report 61-3, Contract DA30-069-ORD-3081 for Frankford Arsenal, Janu-
ary 1961.
' I
S....
.. . .......
. ... ... .. ...o _. ... ..... .. ...
. ... . ... .. .. .... ..
. . .I
REFERENCES-(continued)
tional Bureau of Standards Handbook H28,
Part I.
31. Watertown Arsenal Laboratories, Quarterly Progroes Report to Prankford Arsenal on XM-08 and
XM-.9, 17 March 1959.
32. R. E. Petersen, Stress Concentration Deaign Factors, John Wiley and Sons, N. Y., 1953.
33. T. J. Dolan and E. L. Brogharner, A Photoelastic Study of Stresseu in Gear Tooth Fillets,
University of Illinois Experimental Station Bulletin 335, 1942.
34. Elevated-Temperaiure Propertiesof Wrought Medium.Carbon Alloy Steels, ASTM Special Tech*Mee innkdha:k rover for additional information pertaining to Engineering Design Handhooks,
u. a0
0
100
t* 0,5 i20VUN3rPINF
S-..
hIO 0111CR'
.. .