Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Λογοτεχνία και Μαθηματικά-Κοταρίνου-Χασάπης ΔιημµΟ ΞΉΜ Ξ΄Ξ± Ξ˜ΞµΟƒΟƒαλονίκη
Λογοτεχνία και Μαθηματικά-Κοταρίνου-Χασάπης ΔιημµΟ ΞΉΜ Ξ΄Ξ± Ξ˜ΞµΟƒΟƒαλονίκη
2 . . , Master
email: pkotarinou@sch.gr
, ,
,
.
,
. , ,
.
, ,
,
.
,
.
..
: , , , , ,
1.
..
(, 1998)
( , 2001),
(..2001) , .
,
,
.
1.
.
2.
3.
( 2000).
, ,
( 2001),
.
, ,
, .
(Griffiths 1991, Siegel 1996, , Jenner 2000,
Ameis 2002, Jenner 2002, Whitin 2002)
( 2005). ,
,
(Borasi 1990, Borasi 1998, Siegel 1996 b, Siegel 1998).
,
(Griffiths 1991, Whitin 2002).
,
,
(Griffiths 1991, Siegel 1996, Whitin 2002, Jenner
2000, Jenner 2002,)
(Siegel 1996)
,
(Ameis 2002, Griffiths 1991)
- , , , -
( Borasi 1990).
,
.( Jenner 2000)
.( Borasi 1990)
( Jenner 2002)
,
. ( Jenner
2002)
,
(Griffiths 1991)
( 2002)
( 2002)
,
.
.
(drama in education)
. ,
,
. ( 2002).
( 1994).
,
,
( 2000 .78). ).
2
,
. (Tulej 1990,
2001 ,Ufuktepe 2002, Duatepe, 2004, Duatepe, 2004b).
. (
2005). -
, (Snider 2006)
().
(role playing debate)
, Snider ,
.
2006
, .. 12
.
.
.
.
.
1.
Denis Guedj .
.
.
, ,
. ,
, .
, ,
,
G.H. Hardy
Denis
Guedj, , .
2.
,
.
: , ,
, , .
.
. :
S.Ortoli-N.Witkowski, Denis Guedj,
J-P Luminet, .. ,
Denis Guedj, . ,
Luciano Canfora.
1. . ,
,
- .
Denis Guedj .
.
( 1998). ,
, ,
, , ,
45
. .
2. .
.
, ,
,
, .
.Renyi, . ,
,
, ,
.
.
.
Project: :
, ,
project :
, ,
, ,
, . project
M
.
.
project:
I. .
II.
.
) .
) ,
.
IV.
,
.
V.
, .
V.
Sketchpad
.
;
.
.
( 2003).
Denis Guedj
. ,
, ,
, .
,
.:
,
.
2.
.
.
,
project
.. 21
19, 19 (7 12 )
.
1. .
2. ; .
3.
4. .
5.
,
.
3 (65 ) 3
(62 ).
. 33 (12
, 15 5 ).
SPSS (Statistic Package in Social
Science) ( 2005)
1
3.1
project
(, , )
( , , , , )
( , , , )
1
.
1. project,
(f ) %
1.
f
%
5
26,3
1
5,3
13
68,4
0
0
19 100,0
2.
f
%
5
26,3
1
5,3
12
63,2
1
5,3
19
100,0
3. 4.
f
%
f
%
6
31,6 0
0
3
15,8 3
15,8
10
52,6 9
47,4
0
0
7
36,8
19
100,0
19 100,0
5.
f
%
1
5,3
3
15,8
15
78,9
0
0
19 100,0
, 19
. 10
, 2
.
2.
Dichotomy label
. 1
. 3
.4
.5
2
2
19
10
33
%
6,1
6,1
57,6
30,3
100,0
%
10,5
10,5
100,0
52,6
173,7
,
.
( ,
, ,
)
(, , ,
, , )
( , ,
)
, 3
.
60%
60% .
,.
61,1% , 44,4% ,
38,9% .
42,1%
17 , 36,8% ,
15,8%
, .
3.
Dichotomy label
. 1
. 2
. 3
.5
3
7
8
1
19
%
15,8
36,8
42,1
5,3
100,0
17,6
41,2
47,1
5,9
111,8
, .
.
.
(, , )
( , )
-
1, ,
,
. 5, ,
(71,4%)
..
(75,0%). (14,3%)
, 75%
.
3.2.
project
( , ,
, , , ,
,
-- )
(, ,
, , , ,
, ,
)
( )
28 53,6 % , 42,9%
3,6% ( ) .
17
(89,5%) 2
( 10,5%)
15
(78,9%) 4 (21,1%) .
. : 2 (10,5%), : 11 (57,9%), : 1 (5,3%), : 4
(21,1%). .
10 , 70%
( ,
, ), 30%
30% (
,
,
, )
63,2 %
, 15,8% 10,5%
.
84,2% (16 )
, 10,5%( 2 )
.
, 10 (52,6%) , 6 (31,6%)
3 (15,8%)
.
2
,
,
.
, 21,2% , 15,2%
, 9,1% , 15,2%
39,4%
.
32 . 30,3%
12,1% (:
,
,
) , 15,2% , 9,1%
9,1% , 6,1%
, 1
12,1%
17
() 15 .
. 16 : 9,1%
, 12,1%
, 6,1%
9,1% 12,1% .
- , ;
(
).
: ( )
.
. .
.
: .
..
. . .
.
: .
: , .
.
: .
, .. ,
., .
: . .
.
: ., , .
-
;
;
: . .
: .
: .. .
.
..
.
: .
.
: .
: . . .
. ! .
: ! .
.
. ! .
.
( .)
, .
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.. ,
.
.
.
, .
. , , , , ,
,
, , .
.
.
.
, .
,
. ,
.
,
. :
. , .
. .
. (transactional
reading)* ,
, ,
, o .
(Borasi 98, Siegel 1996 b, Siegel 1998)
* Rosenblatt
10
.
(transactional theory). ( 1999)
,
,
. , ,
.
.
,
.
.
( ,
, )
, .
, .
(integration)
. (Kimberly 2004).
., . (2005)
, 1
, , 2005.
2. .(2000) , ,
3. ., ., (2005)
. ,
. , , , .80-87, 16-19
2005.
4. Altrichter, H, Posch P., Somskh B.,(2001) ,
, , .
5. Ameis, J. (2002) Invite children to solve mathematical problems. Teaching Chealdren
mathematics. Reston: Jan. 2002. Vol.8, Iss. 5; pg. 260
6. Borasi R., Sheedy J. & Siegel M. (1990) The power of Stories in Learning
Mathematics, Language Arts, Feb. 1990, 67, 2
7. Borasi R., Siegel M., Fonzi J., Smith C.,(1998) Using Transactional Reading
Stragedies to support sense making and Discusion in Mathematics Classrooms: An
Exploratory Study, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education ,v29 no3,p 275-305,
My 1998
8. , . (2001) , ,
UNESCO
9. .(2002) , .()
: ,, .
10. Duatepe, Asuman (2004) The effects of Drama based instruction on seventh grade
students Geometry achievement, Van Hiele geometric thinking levels, attitude toward
Mathematics and Geometry, Thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Natural and
Applied Sciences 0f Middle East Technical University
1.
11
18. ., : , 19
...:
, , 8-10 2002
19. .(1994), , ,
.
20. - . (2005) ()
, , ...,
21. (1998), ,
22. (2001),
.
23. (2001),
24. ., (2001) Pascal ,
, , 42, 32-35.
25. Siegel M., Borasi R., Fonsi M., Sanridge L. & Smith C., (1996) Using Reading to
Construct Mathematical Meaning, Yearbook( National Council of teachers of
Mathematics, v 1996, p66-75.
26. Siegel M., Borasi R., Fonsi M., Sanridge L. & Smith C., (1996, b) Beyond word
problems and textbooks: Using reading generatively in the Mathematics classroom, ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED403144
27. Siegel M., Borasi R., Fonzi J.,(1998) Supporting Studentsin Mathematical Inquiries
Through Reading, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,v29, no4, p378-413 Jl
98
28. ., (2003) ,
.
29. , .(2000),
, , ,
,21-23 2000
30. Tulej, J., Gorman M. (1990) Mathematics and Drama, Mathematics teaching,131
31. Ufuktepe U.,Ozel C. (2002), Avoiding Mathematics Trauma: Alternative Teaching
Methods, 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics Crete-Greece,
Willey & Sons, July 2002.
32. Whitin J. D. (2002) The Potential and Pitfalls of integrating Literature into the
Mathematics Program, Teaching Children Mathematics 8,no 9, pg 503-4
11.
12