The document summarizes a court case between Chanan Singh and others versus the State of Punjab and another. The parties were ordered to appear before the lower trial court on December 23rd, 2015 to get their statements recorded regarding the veracity of a compromise between the parties. The trial court is then ordered to send a report on the genuineness of the compromise along with the statements to the registrar within a week. The court must also report whether the petition was filed on behalf of all accused and if any accused was declared a proclaimed offender in the related FIR. Proceedings before the trial court will remain stayed in the meantime.
Original Description:
Authorities for High Court Clerk internal promotions from Group D to Group C
The document summarizes a court case between Chanan Singh and others versus the State of Punjab and another. The parties were ordered to appear before the lower trial court on December 23rd, 2015 to get their statements recorded regarding the veracity of a compromise between the parties. The trial court is then ordered to send a report on the genuineness of the compromise along with the statements to the registrar within a week. The court must also report whether the petition was filed on behalf of all accused and if any accused was declared a proclaimed offender in the related FIR. Proceedings before the trial court will remain stayed in the meantime.
The document summarizes a court case between Chanan Singh and others versus the State of Punjab and another. The parties were ordered to appear before the lower trial court on December 23rd, 2015 to get their statements recorded regarding the veracity of a compromise between the parties. The trial court is then ordered to send a report on the genuineness of the compromise along with the statements to the registrar within a week. The court must also report whether the petition was filed on behalf of all accused and if any accused was declared a proclaimed offender in the related FIR. Proceedings before the trial court will remain stayed in the meantime.
CRM-M-43111-2015 CHANAN SINGH AND ORS VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR Present:
Mr. Lajpat Sharma, Advocate for
Mr. Amandeep Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Notice of motion for 01.02.2016. At the asking of the Court, Ms. Harsimrat Rai, DAG,
Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State.
The parties shall appear before the learned trial Court, on 23.12.2015, to get their statements recorded regarding the veracity of the compromise. The learned Court, after recording the statements, will send a report regarding the genuineness of the compromise being arrived at between the parties, along with the statements, to the Registrar Judicial of this Court, within a week thereafter. The Court shall also report as to whether the present petition has been filed on behalf of all the accused and whether any of the accused has been declared proclaimed offender in the present FIR ? A copy of the report be also sent through fax. In the meantime, proceedings before the trial Court shall remain stayed.
22.12.2015 ashok
ASHOK KUMAR 2015.12.22 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Tajinder Kaur, In Anindita Das v Srijit Das, (2006) 9 SCC 197 it was observed that at one stage the Supreme Court was showing leniency to the ladies but since then it has been found that large number of transfer petitions are filed by women taking advantage of the leniency shown by the Supreme Court. Therefore, the leniency of the Supreme Court was being misused by the women. As such, it was now required to consider each petition on its merit.