Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Track Reconstruction and Performance of DRIFT Directional Dark Matter Detectors Using Alpha Particles
Track Reconstruction and Performance of DRIFT Directional Dark Matter Detectors Using Alpha Particles
Received 4 July 2007; received in revised form 5 October 2007; accepted 8 October 2007
Available online 13 October 2007
Abstract
First results are presented from an analysis of data from the DRIFT-IIa and DRIFT-IIb directional dark matter detectors at Boulby
Mine in which alpha particle tracks were reconstructed and used to characterise detector performancean important step towards
optimising directional technology. The drift velocity in DRIFT-IIa was 59:3 0:2 (stat) 7:5 (sys) ms1 based on an analysis of
naturally occurring alpha-emitting background. The drift velocity in DRIFT-IIb was 57 1 (stat) 3 (sys) ms1 determined by the
analysis of alpha particle tracks from a 210Po source. Three-dimensional range reconstruction and range spectra were used to identify
alpha particles from the decay of 222Rn, 218Po, 220Rn and 216Po. This study found that 22 2% of 218Po progeny (from 222Rn decay)
did not plate out and remained suspended in the 40 Torr CS2 gas ll until they decayed. A likely explanation for this is that some of the
polonium progeny are produced in an uncharged state. For 216Po progeny (from 220Rn decay) the undeposited fraction was apparently
much higher at 1000
35 % most likely due to a shorter lifetime, causing a larger fraction of the progeny to decay whilst drifting to the
cathode plane. This explanation implies a much slower drift time for positively charged polonium progeny compared to CS
2 ions.
r 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PACS: 23.60.+e; 29.40.n; 29.40.Cs; 95.35.+d; 95.55.Vj
Keywords: Dark matter; WIMPs; TPC; Gas detector; Directional detector; Negative ion drift; Alpha spectrometry
1. Introduction
The DRIFT project aims to develop and operate the rst
underground time projection chamber (TPC) array suitable
for observing and reconstructing WIMP-induced nuclear
recoil tracks with enough precision to provide a signature of
the local WIMP Galactic halo [14]. The development of the
Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 114 2223517; fax: +44 114 2728079.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
500
500
1200
to
to
ve
1000
veto
l
ra
nt e
e
d
C ho
t
ca
veto
veto
ve
veto
115
to
to
The DRIFT project aims to make continuing improvements to the design of DRIFT detector modules. DRIFTIIb is an upgraded version of DRIFT-IIa [12] in which the
signicant differences are a simplied arrangement of
electronics and the replacement of copper eldrings with
stainless steel versions. Briey, each detector consists of a
1:5 1:5 1:5 m3 stainless steel vacuum vessel housing a
1 m3 dual low pressure TPC lled with CS2 vapour at
40 Torr. The two modules were operated at different
mean drift elds (620 V/cm in DRIFT-IIa, 581 V/cm in
DRIFT-IIb). The two 0.5 m long drift regions share a
central plane of 512 stainless steel wires of 20 mm diameter
spaced 2 mm apart. This arrangement forms a highly
transparent drift cathode. Readout of charge deposited
within the drift regions is via two 1 m2 multi-wire proportional chambers (MWPCs), 50 cm either side of the central
cathode. The MWPCs consist of grid planes of 512 stainless
steel wires of 100 mm diameter. The grid planes are spaced
1 cm either side of an anode plane comprising 512 wires of
20 mm diameter. These are arranged orthogonal to the wires
in the grids. The wire spacing in all the planes is 2 mm. Veto
regions are instrumented around the edges of the wire
planes. Fig. 1 shows the overall layout of the detector. The
central section of the anode and inner grid planes are each
grouped down to eight outputs. As such, any track that
extends a distance greater than that sampled by eight wires
416 mm will reappear on the same output channels at a
later time in the event record (see Ref. [12] for details of
DRIFT data format). This phenomenon was characteristic
of all the alpha particle tracks observed. Since high energy
alpha particles have a range greater than 300 mm in 40 Torr
CS2, the hit pattern on the eight outputs repeats many times.
Fig. 2 depicts waveforms for an example alpha particle
event.
1
ve
ve
drift direction
drift direction
Y
Y
X
Z
X
Left MWPC
Right MWPC
3. Analysis procedure
3.1. Data reduction and parameterisation
A dedicated analysis was developed to specically select
alpha-like events from the data. Alpha particle tracks are
sufciently different from those of nuclear recoils that the
analysis procedures described in Ref. [13] would not have
been appropriate.
During data acquisition all electronics channels had their
signal waveforms digitised and recorded when any anode
signal exceeded the hardware threshold (200 ADC points,
where 2048 ADCs are equivalent to 1 V). Throughout this
paper above threshold means that the absolute value of
the waveform exceeded the absolute value of the threshold
unless specied otherwise. Once acquired, three virtual
waveforms for each MWPC (the grid sum, the anode sum
and the veto differencesee Fig. 2) were then constructed
from existing waveforms. All waveforms (real and virtual)
then underwent a fast Fourier transform (FFT) to identify
ARTICLE IN PRESS
116
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
Fig. 2. Left: an example alpha particle track. This event deposited charge on the left MWPC only. The event record consists of 1 ms of pretrigger plus 4 ms
of posttrigger data (trigger at t 0). Each trace represents the amplied charge signal, produced on every eighth wire in the MWPC, plotted over time. The
labels
P down the right-hand side (in
P order from top) refer to: difference between grid and anode vetos; anode veto; grid veto; sum of anode channels
8n1 An ; sum of grid channels 8n1 Gn ; individual anode channels (A1 A8 ); individual grid channels (G1 G8 ). The right-hand plot illustrates a view
from the central cathode towards the MWPC looking in the drift direction. The orthogonal anode and grid wire planes form a mesh consisting of repeating
cells of 8 8 wires. Tracks that cross more than eight anode or grid wires wrap around and produce signals on the original channel in the next cell. The
path of the alpha particle is shown superimposed on the grid. The track also extends in the z direction (out of the page) so that the lower left end
encounters the plane of the MWPC rst. As the track drifts into the MWPC this point of contact advances along the track. Note that the point of
contact of the track with the MWPC encounters individual anode and grid wires at different times and with different periodicity, resulting in the difference
in frequency of occurrence of signal pulses between the grids and anodes.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
Table 1
The main analysis parameters extracted from the raw data
polarity
height
voltage_weighted_time
anode_area
wires
start_time
end_time
117
signal
size
+1
FWHM
threshold
height/2
threshold
time
voltage-weighted
time
height
-1
end_time
start_time
wires = 4
x = (wires - 1)*2 mm = 6 mm
z = drift_velocity* t
Fig. 3. The top waveform illustrates the main pulse-specic analysis parameters. Below: a cartoon track depositing charge on four adjacent anode wires,
resulting in waveforms on three adjacent anode channels. The areas of all negative polarity anode pulses exceeding threshold are shown shaded. This gure
highlights the important point that signals observed on a given channel do not necessarily originate from charge deposited on a single wire, since every
eighth wire is connected to the same output channel.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
118
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
time between successive negative polarity voltage_weighted_times in the grid waveforms occurring between the
start_time and end_time. The threshold for accepting pulses
on the grids was 9 ADCs.
3.3. Track definitions
Tracks that traversed at least eight anode wires of an
MWPC wires48, resulting in at least one pulse per anode
channel (A1 A8 ), were agged in the database as candidate
alpha particle events. A major part of the analysis involved
the selection of alpha particle tracks that passed through
the cathode from one side of the detector to the other
without entering a veto region. Such events were labelled
Gold Plated Cathode Crossers (GPCCs) and were selected
with the following additional cuts:
1. An alpha particle track, as dened above, appeared on
both MWPCs.
2. The event had no pulses on the veto difference line with
height445 ADCs.
3. The mean anode pulse area channels A1 2A8
o30 V ms. This cut eliminated occasional amplier
feedbacka problem that affected the highest amplitude events and was resolved in DRIFT-IIb with
replacement preampliers. This cut alone retained
487% of all candidate alpha tracks.
4. The summed area of all anode pulses channels A1 2A8
430 V ms. This eliminated events such as sparks that
deposited charge on all readouts but had a combined
charge less than that expected for alpha particle events.
This cut alone retained greater than 98% of candidate
alpha tracks.
5. start_time greater than 100 ms. This cut alone accepted
greater than 96% of events and was introduced to
remove events in which the pretrigger region contained
pulses from the preceeding trigger.
6. end_timeo3000 ms. This provided a 1000 ms buffer
between the track end_time and the end of the event
record, ensuring that only tracks with a mean voltage_weighted_time separation 41000 ms, on a given anode,
could evadethis cut illegally (equivalent to o0:1% of all
candidate alpha particle tracks).
In summary, none of the cuts mentioned above had a
signicant effect on the measured track range or derived drift
velocity (see Section 5), since the dimensions of the tracks were
not affected. However, cut 6 did constrain the orientations of
the longest tracks in DRIFT-IIa, accepted as GPCCs, to be
greater than 70 from the normal to the wire planes.
4. Types of alpha particle events
4.1. Alpha particle event parameters
Alpha particles were expected in the detector due to
decay of 222Rn (t1=2 3:8 days, decay energy 5:59 MeV)
222
Rn,
220
Rn and
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
119
Rn-222 in gas
alpha decay (t1/2 = 3.8d)
Po-218+ in gas
plate-out
Po-218 on wire surface
alpha decay
alpha escapes
wire
alpha stops
in wire
Pb-214+
escapes wire
plate-out
Pb-214+
stops in wire
beta decay
plate-out
Pb-214 on
wire surface
Bi-214 in wire
beta decay
Po-214 in wire
Pb-210+ stops,
alpha stops
alpha decay
Pb-210+ in gas,
alpha in wire
alpha stops
in wire
Pb-210+ stops
in wire
Pb-210+ in wire,
alpha in gas
alpha escapes
wire
Pb-210+
escapes wire
Pb-210+ escapes,
alpha escapes
Pb-210+ stops,
alpha escapes
Pb-210+ escapes,
alpha stops
plate-out
Pb-210 on wire-surface
Fig. 4. Flow diagram of one decay cycle, starting with the alpha-decay of 222Rn and ending with the long-lived (t1=2 22 years) 210Pb. The three shaded
boxes denote events that produce a recoil with no accompanying alpha track observable. These events are termed radon progeny recoils (RPRs) and are an
important background since they mimic the recoil signature expected for WIMPnucleon interactions.
produce tracks that cross the cathode and satisfy the other
GPCC criteria (see Section 3.3 and Fig. 6).
Radon and uncharged progeny events were characterised
by (i) a clear, extended track appearing simultaneously on
both sides of the detector with an extent in the z direction
less than zmax ; (ii) a lack of signicant veto signals and
(iii) simultaneous end times for tracks on each MWPC,
corresponding with the point where the track crossed
the cathode plane. In all cases, the changing mean peak
height along the track follows the variation in dE=dx,
producing a characteristic Bragg curve that reveals the
direction of the original alpha particle. Fig. 7 shows a
representation of the Bragg curve for the track in Fig. 6.
The Bragg peak occurs in the left detector in this case
indicating that the original decay occurred on the right.
The position of the central cathode is also shown,
218
Po,
214
Po,
216
Po and
212
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
120
Rn-220 in gas
alpha decay (t1/2 = 55.6s)
Po-216+ in gas
plate-out
Po-216 on wire surface
alpha decay
alpha escapes
wire
alpha stops
in wire
Pb-212+
escapes wire
plate-out
Pb-212+
stops in wire
beta decay
plate-out
Pb-212 on
wire surface
Bi-212 in wire
beta decay
Po-212 in wire
Pb-208+ stops,
alpha stops
alpha decay
Pb-208+ in gas,
alpha in wire
alpha stops
in wire
Pb-208+ stops
in wire
Pb-208+ in wire,
alpha in gas
alpha escapes
wire
Pb-208+
escapes wire
Pb-208+ stops,
alpha escapes
Pb-208+ escapes,
alpha escapes
Pb-208+ escapes,
alpha stops
plate-out
Pb-208 on wire surface
Fig. 5. Flow diagram, analogous to that depicted in Fig. 4, starting with the alpha-decay of
220
Table 2
Energies and ranges of alpha particles and resultant recoiling progeny expected in 40 Torr CS2 due to decay of
progeny
222
Rn and
208
Pb.
220
Isotope
Ea
(MeV)
Range
(mm)
Long. strag.
(mm)
Recoil
E recoil
(keV)
Range
mm
Long. strag.
mm
222
Rn
Po
214
Po
5.48948
6.00235
7.68682
334
383
567
13.4
15.3
23.3
218
Po
Pb
210
Pb
100.82
112.33
146.64
577.91
628.54
745.25
119.61
129.62
149.99
220
6.288
6.778
8.785
413
464
701
16.3
18.1
30.0
216
116.5
127.9
168.9
631.99
682.27
818.14
129.08
139.07
162.45
218
Rn
Po
212
Po
216
214
Po
Pb
208
Pb
212
Ranges and longitudinal straggling (Long. strag.) are as simulated by SRIM2003 [14]. Note that the polonium decays will typically occur on or near the
surface of a cathode wire so, for example, an outgoing alpha particle will implant the resulting recoil within the wire and vice versa.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
121
Fig. 6. A cathode-crossing alpha particle track due to radon decay (a GPCC event). The left and right panels refer to the outputs of channels on the left
and right MWPCs, respectively. Since ionisation is deposited in both drift regions, either side of the central cathode, the event is split between the left and
right MWPCs (see Fig. 1). The data acquisition system ensures that waveforms from each MWPC are synchronised to within 1 ms. In this particular
event drifting charge arrived at the right MWPC rst (causing a trigger at t 0). In the meantime the left-hand part of the track drifted to the left MWPC
arriving at t 700 ms. The last ionisation arrives at both MWPCs at the same time t 3000 ms since it has drifted an identical distance through an
identical drift eld (from central cathode to MWPC) in both halves of the detector.
20
15
0
0
2000
4000
6000
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
122
z_max
z_max
B
C
Rn-220
or
Rn-222:
A
DRIFT
1000
DRIFT
E
Po-216 & Po-212
or
Po-218 & Po-214:
500
500
(2)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
residual delta-z
= 104.19 mm
123
+/- 5 deg
INNER GRID
ANODES
OUTER GRID
45 deg
STRONGBACK
65 mm
120 mm
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
collimator
Po-210 source
210
Fig. 9. Setup for measuring drift velocity. A Po source was positioned as shown. The 5.304 MeV alpha particles from this source were collimated with a
250 mm thick polyester lm with a nearly complete annulus cut out of it such that the path of the alpha particles subtended an angle of 45 5 to the
normal to the wire planes. The mean residual range in the drift (z) direction from the inner grid was then 104.19 mm, assuming the range of tracks was as
predicted by SRIM2003. The mean drift velocity vD was then deduced from the mean duration Dt over which the ionisation from these events produced
signals on the anodes.
Table 3
Variation in combined statistical and systematic errors on the value of
R2xy as the maximum value of Dy is changed
30
20
Dy cut
(mm)
R2xy
(mm)
sR2 (stat)
(mm)
sR2 (sys)
(mm)
sR2 (combined)
(mm)
15
25
35
130.9
127.3
124.4
6.5
0.6
0.5
1.8
4.0
5.9
6.7
4.1
5.9
10
0
100
120
140
160
Fig. 10. Distribution of the 2D range R2xy calculated using Eq. (1) for
collimated 210Po alpha particles in DRIFT-IIb. Only tracks where
Dx4100 mm and Dyo25 mm were selected, thus limiting the effect of
sDy (stat) on the overall error.
(4)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
222
Rn alpha particles
400
300
z (mm)
5.3. Background
200
100
0
0
100
200
300
400
x (mm)
Fig. 11. Example scatter plot of x and z components of GPCC tracks
taken from a DRIFT-IIa data set. A drift velocity of 59:2 ms1 was
assumed to calculate Dz. A circular arc of radius 371 mm is shown,
representing the maximum range of 222Rn alpha particles. Note that the
higher range of 218Po alpha particle tracks is indicated by an arc-like
feature at larger radius (see main text for details).
150
100
Counts
124
50
0
200
400
600
3D Range, R (mm)
Fig. 12. Histogram of the 3D range R for GPCC alpha events in DRIFTIIa selected to have Dyo60 mm. The peaks are attributed to alpha decays
of 222Rn (at R 371 mm, 764 28 counts), 218Po (R 425 mm, 132 11
counts), 220Rn (R 458 mm, 13 4 counts) and 216Po (R 515 mm,
10 3 counts). Vertical lines indicate the mean peak positions. These
ranges are 10% higher than those appearing in Table 2. A low-level
continuum is also visible below R350 mm, attributed to alpha particles
that traversed part of a cathode wire and subsequently escaped into the
gas with degraded energy.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
125
100
80
where the
Rn track range R222 was treated as a free
parameter and varied until the sampling error of the
resulting distribution of vD tended to a minimum value.
Using this procedure, the best estimate of the drift velocity
in DRIFT-IIa, derived from 222Rn alpha tracks, was 59:3
0:2 (stat) 7:5 (sys) ms1 when R222 371 mm. The distribution of vd in DRIFT-IIa, determined with the best t
value of R222 , is shown in Fig. 13. For DRIFT-IIb, the
corresponding value was estimated to be vD 55:6
0:2 (stat) 7 (sys) ms1 . These values are consistent with
earlier results.
There are several useful pieces of information provided
by the plot in Fig. 12:
Counts
222
60
40
20
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Drift velocity vd (m / s)
Fig. 13. Distribution of drift-velocity measurements for alpha particle
tracks from 222Rn decay in DRIFT-IIa selected to have Dyo60 mm.
Table 4
Results of drift velocity measurements
Method
vD ms1 , DRIFT-IIa
vD ms1 , DRIFT-IIb
Collimated 210Po
as
222
Rn a
background
61 1 (stat) 3 (sys)
Values in [brackets] are derived values based on the drift eld ratio
between the two modules.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
126
(7)
m0
1 1=e.
F
(8)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
127
Table 5
Results from simulation of 105 alpha decays
vD ms1
Track
category
222
218
220
216
59
(DRIFTIIa)
I
II
66 974
28 079
86 363
81 087
60 409
25 780
55 665
35 852
III
IV
V
VI
VII
15 817
3829
8680
1387
247
51 233
871
19 117
202
25
13 194
4435
5905
992
100
11 401
4577
4535
740
52
I
II
67 035
27 979
86 357
81 194
60 087
25 518
55 643
35 931
III
IV
V
VI
VII
15 741
3809
8228
1213
174
51 189
869
17 950
189
22
13 047
4316
5484
854
73
11 438
4616
4226
645
44
57
(DRIFTIIb)
Po
Rn
600
Po
The entries are the numbers of events that satised the following criteria:
I. Track conned within vessel; II. At least partly in ducial volume (FV);
III. Fully within FV; IV. In FV and also crossing central cathode; V. In
FV and zozmax ; VI. In FV, zozmax , crossing central cathode and 48
anode hits on each side (GPCC); VII. GPCC with Dyo120 mm
(see Section 5.3 for the motivation for this constraint).
220
Rate (day-1)
Rn
400
200
0
160
165
170
175
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Burgos et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 584 (2008) 114128
128
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the support of the US National Science
Foundation (NSF). This material is based upon work
supported by the National Science Foundation under
Grant Numbers 0300973 and 0600789. Any opinions,
ndings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in
this material are those of the author(s) and do not
necessarily reect the views of the National Science
Foundation. We also acknowledge the nancial support
from the EU FP6 programme ILIAS (Contract RII3-CT2004-506222), PPARC and the New Mexico Center for
Particle Physics. CG and SJSP are grateful to EPSRC for
the support of their Ph.D. research. The collaboration
would also like to thank the staff of Cleveland Potash Ltd.
for their assistance.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]