Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10 Control of A Distillation Column For PDF
10 Control of A Distillation Column For PDF
(lb. A/lb. B)
K = total latent heat content of vapor stream in rectifying
section, B.t.u./hr.
LT
12
.E
U
LL
.E
o_
Io
E
w
0
5
.2
.2
.4
.6
.8
1.0
SUI~SCRIPTS
A = low boiling component
B = high boiling component
D = distillate
F = feed
m = plate number in stripping section
n = plate number in rectifying section
,V = bottom plate in column
TV = b o t t o m
literature Cited
A digital computer study was performed to investigate the control of a large column for producing very highpurity overheads and bottoms. The column simulated represents the first unit of a BTX (benzene, toluene,
xylene) distillation train. The operation involves removal of low boiling constituents b y pasteurization,
with benzene withdrawal as a side stream. Extremely close control of side-stream flow rate i s necessary to
satisfy material balance requirements. Since small deviations from the correct rate exhibited large effects
on plate temperature, temperature-indexed control of side-stream rate appeared promising. However,
trays having the greatest temperature sensitivity to side-stream rate showed an anomalous behavior-their
temperature increased with both decreases and increases of boilup rate. A control system adapted to the
effects noted was developed. No results from actual operating columns are included.
288
Figure
2.
Alternative
scheme for top product
composition control
Sidestream P r o d u c t
3TX F e e d
P
FC--
--t-y--
?e:oiier
Column
--
Sidestrear Product
-2
a
>
i/
Bettors
Figure 1.
Analyzer controller
Analyzer recorder
Flow controller
liquid level controller
Ratio controller
Temperature controller
,4 series of digital computer calculadons was made to investigate the effect of operating changes on product quality and
column conditions existing a t steady-state conditions, to
appraise the relative merits of the two control methods, and
to establish a desirable location for the sensing element of the
temperature controller, which would be used with either
method of control. A program similar to that of Rose,
Sweeney, and Schrodt ( 9 )and that of Rosenbrock ( 7 7 , 72). with
added provisions for a complete heat balance of each plate,
was employed with the IBM 704 computer. I n common
with all other known multicomponent programs employing the
relaxation method, computations are made in terms of theoretical, rather than actual, plates. Thus, 39 theoretical rather
than 50 actual trays were simulated on the computer. This is
a necessary and to all indications valid approximation to the
real case. Pertinent data on the column simulated and the
operating conditions selected for study are given in Table I.
Calculated values of physical time constants of various parts
of the column system, representative of the simulated conditions, are given in Table 11.
T h e results of the steady-state calculations made for establishing the characterisrics of the column (Table 111) indicate
the effects of reboiler heat input, side-stream rate, and feed
composition changes on the purity of the product streams
and on the temperature and composition a t several theoretical
plates in the column. T h e conditions a t theoretical plates
21. 22. and 23 are of special interest, since they are sufficiently
close to the feed plate to provide large temperature sensitivity,
but sufficiently removed from it to avoid appreciable temperaVOL.
NO. 4
OCTOBER 1 9 6 3
289
Table 1.
Diameter
Trays
Number
Efficiency, %
Pressure drop, p.s.i.
Feed location
8 feet 6 inches
Side-stream location
Pasteurizing section
Condenser
Operating pressure, p.s.i.g.
Calculated holdups, moles
Condenser, accumulator, and
reflux piping
Trays
Above feed
Below feed
Sump, reboiler, and piping
Total
Feed
Rate, moles/min.
Temperature, O F.
Composition, mole
50 plus reboiler
78
0,14/theoretical tray
Plate 23, actual
18, theoretical
Plate 46, actual
36, theoretical
Plates 47-50 inc., actual
37-39 inc., theoretical
Total
3 . 0 (top of column)
240
139
174
470
1023
Table II.
Column trays
Weir flow time constant
'FT
= A/K =
0.039 min.
V/F
0.125 min.
volume
liquid flow rate
Sump? reboiler, and piping
H e a t transfer time constant
W,C,
UA
HR
0.134 min. =
heat capacity
heat flow rate
Overhead rate,
mole/min.
Side stream
Rate, moles/min.
Required composition, mole %
Bottoms
Rat?, moles/min.
Required composition, mole %
22.26
200
-50 benzene
-50 toluene, xylene, and
heavy ends, small amounts
of light ends, water, etc.
0.2233 (li ht ends plus some
benzene?
11.204
>99,94 benzene
'MR =
V/F
9.91 min.
6.98 min
10.833
<OO. 05 benzene
Effects of Boilup Rate on Tray Temperatures
ture effects from the xylene present in the feed. T h e steadystate conditions a t theoretical plate 28 illustrate the behavior a t
the more removed location.
I n all cases, feed a t essentially saturated conditions was
admitted a t theoretical plate 1 which had been established
by previous calculations as the optimum feed location for the
"base conditions" selected. T h e calcuIaTed values corresponding to these conditions a r e given in item 1 of Table 111.
T h e effects of a 25% increase a n d a 25% reduction in heat
input on product composition a r e given in items 2 a n d 3>
respectively. T h e effects of corresponding changes in the
side-stream flow rate, shown in items 4 a n d 5: illustrate the
relatively minor effect of vapor rate o r reflux ratio. T h e
critical importance of maintaining correct material balance
flow conditions is indicated in items 6 a n d 7> which show the
pronounced effect of minute changes in side-stream rate on The
product compositions. These results demonstrate conclusively that the purity of the side-stream a n d bottoms products is
primarily dependent on the control of side-stream rate: rather
than on reflux ratio, thus establishing the basic superiority of
the proposed control scheme shown in Figure 2.
A comparison of items 1> 6, a n d 7 in Table I11 shows that
small changes in product composition resulting from incorrect
material balance are accompanied by significant temperature
changes a t theoretical plates 21 to 23. As would be anticipated, rhe temperature changes a t locations further removed
from the feed point, such as a t theoretical tray 28, are considerably smaller. This directs the choice of locations for the
sensing element of the temperature controller, a t least for this
particular case, to the former plates.
290
I&EC
Table 111.
Item
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Effects of Boilup, Side-Stream Rate, and Feed Changes on Product Composition and Plate Temperature
Temperature, F.
Side-Stream
( M o l e Fraction Benzene)
Rate,
Mole Fraction Benzene
Theo.
Theo.
Theo.
Moles/
Theo.
Description
plate 22
plate 23
plate 28
Minute
plate 21
Side stream
Bottoms
193.34
Base conditions
207.71
200.14
0.99986
206.04
0.89 x 10-4
11.2040
(0.986)
(0.870)
(0.815)
(0.748)
193.27
201.50
205.35
210.10
Reboiler heat input increased 25y0
0 . 1 8 x 10-4
11 ,2040
0.99993
(0.988)
(0.752)
(0.833)
(0.657)
199.53
208.44
Reboiler heat input reduced 25 %
209.88
0,99359
211.31
0.66 x
11 ,2040
(0.824)
(0.671)
(0.651)
(0.633)
223.33
226.04
Side-stream flow rate increased 25y0
226.70
14.0050
0.80008
227.55
0 . 5 9 x 10-4
(0.333)
(0.330)
(0,329)
(0.328)
192.86
195.88
Side-stream flow rate reduced 25%
196.94
0.99999
0.2054
8.4030
198.46
(0.999)
(0.978)
(0.962)
(0.934)
194.76
207.55
Side-stream flow rate increased 0.05 yo 0,99944
211.23
214.82
0.44 x 10-4
11.2091
(0,691)
(0.947)
(0.621)
(0.558)
195.38
213.15
209.57
Side-stream flow rate increased 0.07y0
0.41 X
11.2114
216.48
0.99925
(0.931)
(0.646)
(0.581)
(0.525)
193.30
202.50
Reboiler heat input increased 35y0
206.91
212.20
0.99993
0 . 1 2 x 10-4
11 ,2040
(0.987)
(0.716)
(0.808)
(0.611)
193.26
200.64
Reboiler heat input increased 15%
203.95
208.10
0.99991
0.31 X
11 ,2040
(0.988)
(0.855)
(0.785)
(0.701)
194.01
Reboiler heat input reduced 15%
204.00
201.60
0,99947
206.69
11 ,2040
0.49 x 10-3
(0.968)
(0.831)
(0.784)
(0.734)
Reboiler heat input increased 5%
193.30
202.97
200.10
206.55
11.2040
0.99989
0.59 X
(0.988)
( 0 , 8 0 9 ) (0.868)
(0.736)
Reboiler heat input reduced 5%
193.44
202.71
200.14
0.14 x 10-3
0.99981
205.81
11.2040
(0,983)
(0.867)
(0.815)
(0.753)
193.06
199.14
197.45
33% feed rate increase
0,2054
0.99993
201 .40
11 ,2040
(0.993)
(0.936)
(0.904)
(0.860)
20y0 feed rate reduction
227.40
230.18
0,80009
230.78
231.53
0 . 2 6 x 10-5
11 ,2040
(0.260)
(0,264)
(0.259)
(0.258)
Mole fraction benzene in feed in192.90
196.97
195.98
0,2055
0.99998
198.29
11 ,2040
creased 0 10
(0.998)
(0,961)
(0.976)
(0.939)
Mole fraction benzene in feed re227.09
230.50
231 ,27
11.2040
229.88
0.16 X
0.80141
ducrd 0 10
(0,269)
(0.265)
(0.264)
(0.263)
+ l o % benzene, -10% toluene
193.17
198.98
0 . 1 3 x 10-3
13.430
197.51
0,99985
200.85
change in feed compn.. side(0.935)
(0.990)
(0.873)
(0.909)
stream rate adjusted
-10% benzene. + l o % toluene
203,72
0.99988
0.96 X
193.53
212.96
8.977
208.06
change in feed compn., side-stream
(0,981)
(0.779)
(0,596)
(0,690)
rate adjusted
4-5y benzene. -7y0 toluene change
198.02
202.13
193.18
0,99988
0.92 x 10-4
12,399
199.82
in feed compn., side-stream rate
(0.990)
(0.922)
( 0 , 8 4 2 ) (0.887)
adjusted
- 11 g/, benzanc, +2% toluene
0,99993
193.23
200.75
208.89
204.31
0 . 5 9 x 10-4
8.756
change in feed compn., side-stream
(0.685)
(0.989)
( 0 , 7 7 7 ) (0.852)
rate adjusted
NO.
OCTOBER
1963
291
-101
85
90
35
100
IO5
110
115
120
125
130
135
Time-
Figure 6.
1.0
09
>
03
r
z
07
i
D
--
36
0 5
11
0.3
c
E
0.2
L 7
3.:
NO. 4
OCTOBER 1963
293
T h e o r e t i c a l P l a k Numbei
With the establishment of the best position for the temperature-sensing element and the determination of the penalties
involved with the use of this and other locations, one can
evaluate the best method of using the analyzer sampling the
side-stream product composition. Should it be used to reset
the temperature controller? Or: to reset the side-stream flow
controller itself along with the temperature controller to compensate for possible insensitivities in that element? These two
possibilities are illustrated by Figure 13.
I n the case of a tray 21 location for the temperature element,
the steady-state temperature offsets tested in Table I11 must he
removed by a n integral action on the part of the analyzer
controller. Since a large dead time is present a t the sidestream location, along with an appreciable analysis time for
many analytical devices such as chromatographs, this correc294
l&EC
i 10.0
7.5
5.0
I
2.5
Reboiler
IC
12
I4
;6
I8
20
22
24
26
28
yg;&y&
30
32
35
j6
'
~I
I0
12
I4
16
I8
T b e o r e t i c a ' cla!e
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
j6
NuTier
NO.
4 OCTOBER 1 9 6 3
295
literature Cited
(1) Archer, D. H., Rothfus, R. R., Chem. Eng. Progr. Symp. Ser.
57, NO. 36, 2-19 (1961).
(2) Berger, D. E., Campbell, G. G., Chem. Ens. Progr. 51, 348-52
(1 955).
(3) Berger, D. E., Short, G. R., Znd. Eng. Chem. 48, 1027-30
(1 9 56).
(4) Hoyt, P. R., Stanton, B. D., Petrol. Refiner 32, 115-19 (October
1953).
(5) Oldenbourg, R. C., Sartorius, H., The Dynamics of Automatic Control, pp. 99-1 57, American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, New York, 1948.
(6) Rademacher, O., Rijnsdorp, J. E., Dynamics and Control of
Continuous Distillation Columns, Proceedings of 5th World
Petroleum Congress, Paper 5, Section VII, May 1959.
(7) Rijnsdorp, J. E., Maarleveld, A., Use of Electrical Analogues
in the Study of the Dynamic Behavior and Control of Distillation Columns, pp. A63 ff., Symposium on Instrumentation and
Computation in Process Development and Plant Design, May
1959, Institution of Chemical Engineers, London.
(8) Rose, A,, Johnson, C. L., Williams, T. J., Znd. Ens. Chem.
48, 1173-9 (1956).
(9) Rose, Arthur, Sweeney, R. F., Schrodt, V. N., Zbid., 50, 737-40
(1958).
(10) Rose, A,, Williams, T. J., Ibid., 47, 2284-9 (1955).
(11) Rosenbrock, H. H., Brit. Chem. Ens. 3, 364-7, 432-5, 491-4
(1 958).
(12) Rosenbrock, H. H., Trans. Znst. Chem. Ens. London 35, 347-51
(1 9 5 7).
(13) Rosenbrock, H. H., Tavendale, A. B., Storey, C., Challis,
J. A,, Transient Behavior of Multicomponent Distillation
Columns, Preprints of Papers, International Federation of Automatic Control Congress, Moscow, June 27 to July 7, 1960,
pp. 1277-82, Butterworths, London, 1960.
(14) Smith. 0. J. M., ZSA J . 6 , 28-33 (February 1959).
(15) Williams, T. J., Znd. Ens. Chem. 50, 1214-22 (1958).
(16) Williams, T. J., ZSA J . 9, 39-42 (July 1962).
(17) Williams, T. J., Harnett, R. T., Chem. Eng. Progr. 53, 220-5
(19.57).
(18) Williams, T. J., Harnett, R. T., Rose, A,, Znd. Ens. Chem.
48, 1008-19 (1956).
(19) Williams, T. J., Min, H. S., I S A J . 6, 89-93 (September
1959).
RECEIVED
for review September 26, 1962
ACCEPTED
March 8, 1963
Division of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 142nd meeting,
ACS, Atlantic City, N. J., September 1962.
7
Figure 13. Uses of analyzer controller
as secondary control element in column
control
Upper.
lower.
PROCESS OPTIMIZATION B Y
SEARCH TECHNIQUES
D
H I MM ELB LA U
An adaptive search technique is proposed to solve the following type of problem: Maximize or minimize an
objective function subject to linear or nonlinear constraints of the form G i ( X I , x2 , x,) = 0, 1 5 i 5 m;
m
n. The objective function itself may b e linear, nonlinear, or expressed as some integral. An example
application is presented for a simplified butane isomerization process.
<
296
..