COMPLAINT MAIL To: Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 Richmond, Virginia 23218-0367 Note: The Gommission does not accept fax or e-mail complaints Namo of Judge, Location of Court Cit Date of incident Case Name or Number (if known) Current Status of Caso. Name and telephone number of persons who witnessed the judge's conduct: Geatge tt Me De pea hee Description aa a oa said or did that you believe was improper: dad + ha goytene fo Gash fa Lawred Langeds fo Hines! Sala Gs) Dea 23, Bi “ak Nant, Adurb do ae pages may be attached) D0 NOT SEND ORIGINAL COURT RECORDSISCORD Wher NOT PEAR ND Name Daytime (Please Print Cleary) Serer ne (202) 368-7178. Revised 01042014COMPLAINT MAIL To: Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 Richmond, Virginia 23218-0967 Note: The Commission does not accept fax or e-mail complaints. Name of Judge Judae James Clark Location of Court a ri é od CHOW S. + Pth eno Date of incident Case Name or Number (f known) a Name and telephone number of persons who witnessed the judge's conduct: Current Status of Cas {additional pages may be attached) DO NOT SEND ORIGINAL COURT RECORDS/RECORD WILL NOT BE RETURNED Name Daytime (Please Print Cleary) Janice Wolk Grenadier __Telephone (202) 368.7178 Adres ia ate {| 280 Note: The Commi ‘accept unsigned complaints. Revised: 09042014VIRGINIA: ‘THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA ILONA ELY GRENADIER HECKMAN DAVID M. GRENADIER PLAINTIF®S Case No, 1:15 -me- 01540 UNA v. CASE NO City of Alexandria VA. CL. 15 - 003661 JANICE WOLK GRENADIER STATEMENT OF FACTS FOR WELLS FARGO BANK COURT ON DECEMBER 23,2015 GHV PARTNERSHIP . JAMES WARBASSE efe PADRICKELLY O'BRIEN 238 3 ARMY NAVY COUNTRY CLUB gq 8s 33. DEFENDANTS 4 § zor 323 2h COUNTER CLAIM/cRosscommaInT p| 2 4) Zed JANICE WOLK GRENADIER #2 8 83 DEFENDANT B oF ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GREN. . ENADIER HECKMAN (Ilona) GREANDIER ANDERSON STARACE. DUFFETT & KIESER (Grenadier Law et al) DAVID MARK GRENADIER (David) MICHEAL WIESER ESQ (M, WIESER) DIMUROGINSBERG BEN DIMURO (BEN) ‘ANDERA MOSLEY STATE OF VIRGINIA BWW LAW GROUP (BWW LAW), TROUTMAN SANDERS AKA MAYS AND VALENTINE WELLS FARGO BANK Plaintiffs — AS PUBLIC SERVANTS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS AN OFFICER OF THE “OURT WHERE APPLICABLE STATEMENT OF FACTS FOR COURT DATE WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 23, 2015 KANGAROO COURT ‘That Judge Clark refused to reeu even with evidence that he had Jailed Janice from October 22 — November 12,2014 illegally and for CASH for his Lawyer friends: Miche DiMuroGinsberg: Andrea ‘Wieser, ‘Mosley, Ben DiMuro, Judge John Tran, Hillary Collyer In the Court of the City of Alexandria, Wednesday December 23, 2015 their ws Judge and the opposing side you will see had alex v8 no court reporter as the iy decided what would take place, Girgis and Judge svare she want get a Fat ‘appearance the State of Virginia. This unusual absence of ‘ecks and balances has become a “perfect tom” of unchesked pote, absence of monn oversight, 1sonar motivated professionals who operas the system—lawyers, iy couny-evel bureeerts, anc of whom are open to input from litigants. The resulting exploitation ruin the Arserioan Cities wet families while enriching attorneys, governments, elected officials and judges who scmvinices sc Panera ty and they alone, created: In 1967, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas posed the ‘oliowing inquiry: ".. What abou the Judge who conspires with ical lan enforcementetiege allroad’ a dissenter? What about the judge who knowingly urns arial Ino a kangarce' cous? Or Sar setomingly lous the Constitution inorder 1 obtain a conviction? ..” [Plerson®. Ray, 386 US. BSE (M60). | Those very issues raised by Justice Douglas over 40 ears ago ere now nsicing Beano th ewsuit exposing the two original Plentfiand other's such actors while serving ec on example to others who migh be intentionally abusing the protected righ of selerprescnied Iisa Miche Wieatingitas lear Judge Clark had iegally uled Janice for financial gain forthe lawyers Bea neipt ett and DiMuroGinsberg: Andrea Mosiey, Bon DiMuca, Julge John Tem Hilly Colger in rents Ca sil felt he was not biased which should scare the “SHIT” out of all Ameren. hades diane wat did goto Jal for “Cash for Kids” Judge Clark ha created “Cash for Lawyess my ‘and favor with the Judiciary / Old Boys Network" ‘The Parties involved in the Hearing on December 23, 2015: argon yuan November 12,2014 to Michael Wieser “lam so sony I ean na collect ose leat oo, {2 20u, You wil need to come beck fora Judgment” Me. Wierer never went bask forse id DiMuroGinsberg and now judge Clark has given lona Grenadier Heckman the power te elec Tang tl hearing on Janice Wolk Grenadier’ home - Judge Clark is no differnt then Case tive KIDS Judge's Ciavarella etal. Ta ne Clark never reviewed the “Orders” from DiMuroGinsberg or Troutman Sanders stating“ wll sign what ever you give me ~ write your Orders how you want them pimaro Ginsburg Andrea Mosley spoke maybe 2 minutes and then told the Judge they didn't want any do i Attorney Reza S. Moshin - Troutman Sanders LLP - never spoke ~ never submitted his Order for Foren before the Judge said just write your Orders have them signed and twill sign them: he ‘sppearance was the deal between him and the Judge was made prior to walking inshe doce, sree neytisha K Glegis—Parker, Simon & Kokois, LLC -tlona Grenadier Heckman’ lawyer {luted before the hearing she wasnt going to be speaking and never spoke ~The deal nd bean ocd before she walked in the daor it eould not be more obviceejanice Wolk Greandier - Spoke ~ tied to defend offer argument but, w Negi or Judge with Jurisdiction. Judge Clark was a good litle bay forall he “OLD Rowe laa RK Ad other Sudge’s~ he did just what they wanted, The question now ashe he ted asthe sain ceanstvania Cash for Kids using the jas inthe Cy of Alexandria all nd tots Fired coe etry evidence submitted into the cour, demanding lanice be found incompaen coh fico end to Nona to drug Janie and get sexually inappropriate pictures, ora nc he ‘© plant rugs inher home or on one of her gris - the blog jwgrenadirisslin.logspeccon denied if expected Due ing, rs, iinet what all the Judiciary, the Government and the Elected Offical forget is Janice was one of Rep, Janice was a trusted party a the dinner table to keep their SECRET as fe hen the Judiciary Frade rari, The Tricks the Judges use to Bully. Manipulate the case for penonal oy wen see friends financial gain, Teis trading on Wall Street. That words, a favorite is “frivolous” “No Merit” li ie irhudge fenecuelPe “BULLIED TO DEATH” exposing Judge Bellows of Fisax vi he spree iedodge James Clark took notes. Pete Scamado the main Villain in 1968 Killed "Murder fe Horse Gia Send Sam Degeia J. He would then move to Northern Vigina and noone wosld bed reo Belo sine found out Pete wanted Chris Mackney dead and did tha with the bep cftage Echows, That Divorce Lawyer lona Grenadier Heckman would use te power ofthe esis the Wolk Gres sia did when the appearance of “Murder for Hire” on two occasion aguizo lice Grok Grenadier in September 1997 and March of 2011 was botched. But Judge Clark eatin Sena dd nt stop thei n 2012 afer mailing back all the evidence entered nto te ert court se eans fe timinl acs of Lawyer ona, they hired or as iead Mark Stuart who was dog tne ond Bet sexual inappropriate pictures, ice's home or on one of her girls, Ee spudnot do it nd amined to the scheme by ll appearance of Judge Clark. Kent and asec range were called they sated “We were told by Commonwealth Atterey Randy Senge acer ns to take any Police Reports from you" _Ditmess George MeDermott — took the stand and under Oath stated: That he was in cou and saw the BO1s a er Grund Jury on February 2012. Stated very clearly he was in cou on Novenee 2 sound fepcated what he heard Judge Clark say to opposing council.“ am so sory Team vor colin Winsett fe for you" that “you will ave to come back to court to get aJudgment™ to lager Meee Wieser eroneating started with Judge Clark denying the say and denying the moving ofthe ease to USDC of Distriet Court: Mreaatm hetook e Bully type attitude through out the court hearing taking orders fone Ratt Fined a ita you get with Judge James Clark a man who thinks Bullng« Prose Liggant for Financial gui fr his friend is the appropri of a Judge, That finds the defense of Due Process basically "Frivolous" is treason tothe courts and to all Amerie, ‘That Janice stated 1" that she would like to calla witness. 3age Clr tied refusing tling Janice to paraphrase what he Witness would sey ~ another TRICK by ‘Tudge's to make you think you are being heard when in truth they are denying you due procees Mien Janice went to try and call her witness George MeDermott Judge Clerk tied to deny such Witness and thea relented aftr it was pointed out how Janice has never besn allowed to call eines in ‘any ofthe trials that were open court where Judge Clark didnot rule fiom his chambers That George McDermott testified under oath to the following: 1. Janice bad never been given a fare hearing, 2. That he was in court the day Janice went to jil October 22,2014 + The he was in court on November 12, 2015 and say and heard the following A. Janice was not allowed to read her fll stateinent into the revere 5. That Michael Wieser atiomey that Judge James Clark stated“ I am so soy I cannot collect your legal fees for you" that he than went on to state “You will nced to eome back to cour for 8 judgment Trowel Gk made it clear ha ead ll documents oeame int the cout wih Bias slog with Tra aeGe of he criminal actions ofthe lawyers Ben DiMus, Andrea Mosey Hebs Gitta oe ota ‘Tran, Hillary Collyer. release att denied that Sudge Haddock had snything to do with his geting this job was laughable, { Fedele Jade I was the daughter in law of Judge Albert Grenadier and knew very wel ho ees the Judges play and what goes on behind closed doors That when asked what Janice defense was ofthe Four Comers of the Demure she fora moment was Pits and had forgotten some of her documents The Judge Then read from her decomene Oe ‘Due Process was her defense. He picked and chose whale wanted to share. Temes a lat made it clear Due Process was not defense to him, That he heard te heaing was 2igiee such scheme to help his friends and for him not o understand or know the laws ek ter es sper mating malor decisions on people's ives everyday. ‘That Janice could wot becee trae a ‘appropriate to hear this hearing, he reanc® state what a great country America was, We have young men and women fighting for Bans iother countries being denied to Jie. Janice then looked back Judge Cosedie eid sated “She did not believe that he would appreciate lo isude Clark ried to defend himself saying that Judge Haddock had nothing to do with his geting the Job Judas ~ which is «total joke. With out Judge Haddock and the lawyers in the court roos or tei ons ‘he would never have been siting up at the beneh, janice reminded him she knew ofthe Tricks Judges played and the system as she had been married to avid. That he had stated out with denying her end tampering with the Grand Jury et al. THAT WHEN JUDGE CLARK WAS DONE HE TURNED TO THE OTHER ATTORNEYS - GIVE ME WHAT EVER YOU WANT IN YOUR ORDERS AND I WILL SIGN THEM. Which s what he did he signed Order for Troutman Sanders that sated the folowing from Janice Wolk Grgnadier stich shouldbe considered with his endorsement as Judge Clark and the alomneys. signed the ater with no objections: The Orders Janice has are certified Orders by the Clerks inthe Cy of Alexandria, Janice Wolk Grenadier ~ Pro Se Objects to Troutman Sanders Order December 23, 2015 Bage2: To Judge not having Jurisdiction ruling in Bias, Favoritism, Cronyism, Retaliation, Retribution in favor of Divorce Lawyer llona Grensdier Heckman That “Due Process” ‘Page 3 Order: is not important to Judge Clark. That witness George McDermott whom under oath stated Judge Clark on Nov 22, 2014 sui to Michael Wieser “lam so sory I cannot collest your legal fees for You" Judge Clark then went on to stat to Michael Wieser that you will need to come back for another ‘nearing fora judament. These legal fees show more calls to Judges chambers then to his own client. It is ‘tknovm fact and Janie has seen the close friendship of Michael Wieser and Judge Clark ~ _Sadge Clark then went onto say what is your claim ~ Judge Clark does not fee! "Due Process” is something that Janice deserves ~_Tanice ried to enter documentation into the court and Judge Clark aske opponents if they had a ‘roblem ~ of course they didn’t want the documents in the court that should the collusion and the corruption ofthe parties ‘Page 4: Janice was denied entering into the courts the documents that showed 1. Judge Clark had by all appearance recused himself in Jan 2012 2. udge Clerk, with Kemler and Dewkins tampered with the evidence that had been entered into the record on October 2012 3+ Judge Clark according to Mark Stuart requested Janice to be found incompetent then Toa fixed or ass flend Mark Stuart agreed to 1. Drug Janice and get inappropriate sexual pictures 2, Rape ne of Janice’s daughters 3. Plant drugs on Janice's girls or inher home. When the police rere Called Jenice was told “Randy Sengel the Commonwealth attorney told them they were not allowed to take any Police reports. 4. Judge Clark is aware of and party tothe blog jwgrenadiersalair blogspot.com age Si Judge Clark further illegally Jniled Janice from October 22 November 12,2014 having her tortured in ~ _Tn-court today Judge Clark made it clear Due Process was not important to himeels wo years he has made ita patter and practice to coverup all eriminal acs cf Divorce lawyer Iona grenadier Heckman and Judge Donald Haddock IWG ‘Janice Wolk Grenadier ~ ProSe objects order DiMuroCinsborg Objected to as Judge Clark does not have jurisdiction, Wi Judge 188 George MeDermott stated under Oath Rage 2s had stated to Michael Wieser“! am so sory I can't collect legal fees for you" The Bllying of ‘udge Clark to favor Judge Haddock, whom he would not have this jab is obvious ~ that to goto the ‘xtreme of 1. October 2012 removing the information that shows his buas by mailing back documents probally submitted into the court 2 Wanting me to be found incompitant hiring of Mark Stuart to drug and get several appropriate pictures oF raping one of my girls or planting drugs on them or in our home 3, Mlegaly jailing for legal fees that are obvious using the jails to futher bully me 4. The legal fes are not judgesments / Orders 5. Ignoring the motion to recuse shows Due Provess our Cons {important to Judge Clarke § The statement in itself to Michael Wieser on November 22, 2015 (should be 2014) says itll “I am so sorry I can’t collect your legal fees” 7. When Janice asked for Due Process Judge Clatk stated tional rights toa fie ial is not fearing Over” to opponenss Page 3: To opponents lawyers: Give me your Orders I will sign them ‘The eppearance is clear “Due Process” ignoring the criminal acts of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman is in direct conflict with the judicial Canons and Obstruction of wus junice, ‘hat Judge Clack had been served by a third party, « Writ of Mandamus and Prohibitioa to his right to act 35,8 Judge in these hearing as been fled. A police report and FBI reports have been fled agains hie judge and he is aware of them as well as law suits. Yet he fels he is not Bias? The Alecants Poles have chosen to ignore his actions 1 Janice Wolk Grenadier, am the Defendant in this action. I personaly st forth the allegations of {actin this Answer and Counter Clim Cross Complain, and I hereby declare under penalty of perjury ‘hat each of said allegations is true and correc. Date: December 28, 2015 15 West Spring Street Alexandria, Virginia 22301, Telephone (202) 368-7178 ‘Email jwgrenadier@gmail.com 6vincIMA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA TLONA LY GRENADIER, eat, Plage, * Case No, CL1S003661 JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, ef al, Defendams, ORDER ‘This matter came before the Court on the Demurrer, Plea in Bar, and Motion to Ske the “Counter Claim end Cross Complaint” fled by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, ax ‘Trste for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-2, Aset-Backed Certificate, Series 2008-2 (Well Fargo"), Upon consideration ofthe Demurrer, Plea in Bar, and Motion to Ste, fr the easons stated from the bench, itis hereby ORDERED that the Demurer, Pea in Bar, and Motion to Strike are SUSTAINED; further ORDERED that each and every claim asserted ageinst Wells Fargo in Ms, Grenadier's “Counter Claim and Cross Complain ie DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Entered this <3 day of December, 2015. ons Monta OME Lonm % Bvary DHL a mah eS ramaWEASK FoR THIS; WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ‘AS TRUSTEE FOR OPTION ONE MORTGAGE ‘LOAN TRUST 2005-2, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-2 By: S, Mohsin Reza (VSB W7S347) ‘TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 1850 Towers Crescent Plaza, Suite 500 ‘Tysons Comer, VA 22182 Telephone: 703-734-4334 Facsimile: 703-734-4340 E-mail: mohsin eza@jroutmansanders.com Counsel fr Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, 1s Truste for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-2, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-2 ‘SEEN AND : TLONA ELY GRENADTER DAVID M.GRENADIER 2 272 Bersaall Diva, ay ‘VSB No. 18784 Andrea L. Moseley, Esq. VSB No. 430¢7 DiuroGinsbere, PC 101 King Ses Suite 610 Alecanin, VA 72314 Counsel for Plas WALK-GRENADIER Flim ng dit , ip a Fi | t- ‘pda et Oe Ba0 holed net lux des Ube. Under Obtp Hott d Wate Meopined apekesing to tHe “i at (G4 rod ay le danlee ee id Hs ariabarey Peaches harel ate A fs erat Wo do Nhwk Heed oats Uae a bn Be cl pet "a Bone wee a Go & penne’ Pf Hale. ei ee sr Sings ieenmvacls A oe “tune they pe nl allowed “0 lee apo? « Bbae Vow u dwore of * Be | 88, she blog \ enadsaeb ar SS a en‘anle Wolk Grenadier ~ Pro Se Objects to TroutmanSanders Order December 23, 2015 £Eage 2; To Judge not having Jurisdiction rating in Bias, Favoritism, Cronyism, Retaliation, Retribution in favor of Divorce Lawyer flona Grenadier Heckman That “Duc Process" age.3 Order: not important to Judge Cask. That witness George MeDermott whom niet enh sated Judge Clark on Nov 22,2014 said to Michael Wieser" am so sors | to say what is your claim ~ Judge Clark docs not feel “Duc Process” is something that Janice deserves, ~ _jatice tried to enter documentation into the court and Judge Clark aske opponents it they had a problem ~ of course they didn't want the documents in the come ties ‘should the collusion and the corruption of the parties Pare 4: Janice was deniod entering into the cours the documents that showed 1. Judge Clark had by all appearance recused himself in Jan 2012 2. Judge Clark, with Kerler and Dawns tampered with the evidence that hed been entered into the record on October 2012 + fudge Clark according to Mark Stuart requesied Janice tobe found incompetent then Hone fixed or as a friend Mark Stuart agrood to I. Drug Janie and ge late Sexual pictures 2. Rape one of Janice's daughters 3. Pant drugs Bags S: Judge Clark rhe illegally Jailed Janice from October 22— November 12,2014 having her tortured in jail + Tncourt today Judge Clark made it clear Due Process was not important to him ‘Te last two years he has made it a pattem and practice to coverup all criminal cls of Divorce lawyer Ilona grenadier Heckman and Judge Donald Haddock awVIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA Tlows Grenadin, eff wales Grenadin, ef Fraiadtt vs Case Number CL 10 ~ 00366) ORDER This cause came on this dey upon_ Plains" Die mverer ae Defemdenth 10 /13)IF Counterclaim AND IT APPEARING that__-Hu_Deprurcers_¢ ev td c ngented Cbesens Spo. jn leading filed 6 Ventilfs ; Wis therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that__he. CovmterAninn led on ye M3pir is Asmined with prejsdica - if FORE SPAOMAN CHER al a rary cin rye NEC al ENTERED this 23“ dayot__Decom bine 2015D a D) Wher ict Gphed Cbd Woe Huled™ Hall, Dooe pf a tn auaa lass piben's wu Tt ge es . a tos ne feo a at [oorler? Tora. a de Hebi ip lu, deteot, ee pthetetio 4, pee | That Pc ta st & ak ph, a Wau dans te talent ba ag Oe eadJanice Wolk Grenadier - ProSe objects order DiMuroGinsberg Objected to as Judge Clark does not have jurisdiction. Witness George McDermott stated ‘under Oath Judge Page 2: had stated to Michael Wieser “I am so sory I can't collect legal fees for you" ‘The Bullying of Judge Clark to favor Judge Haddock, whom he would not have this job ‘is obvious — that to goto the extreme of 1. October 2012 removing the information that shows his buas by mailing back documents probally submitted into the cour. 2. Wanting me to be found incom fof Mark Stuart to drug and get several inappropriate pictures or raping one of my girs or planting drugs on them arin our home 3. Illegally jailing for legal fees that are obvious using the ails to Further bully me 4. The legal fees are not judgesments / Orders 5. \gnoring the mation to recuse shows Due Process our Constitutional rights to. tral is no important to Judge Clarke 6. The statement in itself to Michael Wieser on November 22, 2015 (should be 2014) says itall “Lam so sorry I can't collect you legal fees” 7. When Janice asked for Due Process Judge Clark stated “Hearing Over” to opponenis Page 3: To opponents lawyers: Give me your Orders I will sign them acts of Divorce Lawyer ‘That Judge Clark had been served by a third party, a Writ of Mandamus and Prokibition {his righ to act asa Judge in these hearing has been filed. ‘A police report and FBI reports have been filed against this judge and he is aware of them ‘The Alexandria Police have chosen to ignore his actionsIN THE ; ‘SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA IN RE: JANICE WOLK GRENADIER PETITIONER / PLAINTIFF — PRO SE POOR PERSON v. NRE: (JUDGE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA RESPONDENT / DEFENDANT EMERGENCY PETITON FOR WRIT OF MAMDAMUS — PROHIBITION FOR IGNORING THE LAW THE ACTS AND ACTONS OF JUDGE ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN THE “CASH FOR KIDS” IN PENNSYLVANIA THE JUDGE JAILED JANICE WOLK GRENADIER FOR FINANCIAL GAIN FOR HIMSELF AND HIS FRIENDS — STATED VERY CLEARLY “DUE PROCESS” WAS NOT A DEFENSE IN HIS COURT ROOM That the Orders attached Exhibits 1 and 2 state this and the Judge signed the “ORDERS” knowing they said this - which should be taken as the “TRUTH” and his confirmation for these criminal acts — the appearance is he believes he is so above the law that acknowledging his criminal acts believes it will not matter because he is Policed by his peers and his peer will support his criminal activity ~ due to the lack of integrity — lack of Due Process in the Court Room and on the Bench GOMES NOW Janice Wolk Grenadier petitions the above Court for a Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition to stop the criminal acts and action of JUDGE JAMES CLARK and to VACATE HIS Order's OF DECEMBER 23, 2015 AND 1ALL OTHER ORDERS BY HIM Since 2012. DUE TO LACK OF JURISDICTION FOR RULING IN BIAS, FAVORTISM, CROYNISM, RETALIATION, RETRIBUTION AND FOR PERSONAL AND FRIENDS FINANCIAL GAIN. That when there is no Due Process there is no Statute of Limitations, That it is apparent to even a lay person Judge Clark does not believe in or follow the Law, the Rules of the Supreme Court and of the United States Constitution or the nia Constitution which he is ignoring. That Petitioner requests Oral Argument to present further evidence. That the Petitioner comes to this court to have a Stay on the Case in Virginia Case No. 15- 003661 AND the case opened appro) as it should have been in the District of Columbia where Petitoner_moved this case due to the lack of Intearety in the Vis judiciary. The other choice is to Dismiss this case with Prejudice against Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman, That the USDC of the District of Columbia Court is unique in it is the court of "HATE" crimes throughout the United States, but not only that this. is the court when there are multiple jurisdictions as this case has. As well as the main Plaintiff llona Grenadier Heckman being a resident of the District of Columbia since on or around 1987, THAT THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNTIED STATES OF AMERICA IS SUPPOSDLY MORE THAN ANY COURT ‘THE COURT OF THE PEOPLE NOT OF THE JUDGES AND THEIR FRIENDS TO Rule in Bias, Favoritism, Cronyism, Bias, Retribution, 2Retaliation, and for personal or friends financial gain. Petitioner: further reminds the Court she is Poor Pro Se Litigants and the Law: Many prose litigants will use this in ther pleadings; "Pleadings inthis case are being fled by Plaintiff In Propria Persona, wherein pleadings are to be considered? without regard to technicalities. Propria, pleadings are not to be held tothe tame high Standards of perfection as practicing lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner 92 Sct 504, also ‘See Power 914 F2d 1459 (11 Cir1990), also See Hulsey v. Ownes 63 Fid 354 (5th Cir 1995). also Seen Re: HALL v, BELLMON 935 F.2d 1106 (10th Ci. 1991)." Jn Pucketv. Cox, it was held tha a prose pleading requires less stringent reading than one drafted bya lawyer (456 Fad 233 (1972 Sixth Cireult USCA). Justice Block in Conley-v. Gibson 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957. "The Federal Rules rejects the aperoach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive tothe outecme and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading ito failtae a proper decision on the merits." According to Rule 8() FRCP and the State Court rule which holds that all pleadings shall be construed to do substantial justice" ‘That Petitioner is asking this court for Relief that Judge Clark has violated Several Judicial canons including not limited to Canon 2(A), which states that “lal judae should conduct himself at all times ina manner that promotes ublic confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the ju lary." That it is obvious and even his acts or lack of acts from the bench are obvious along with denying open court hearings and ruling from his Chambers in Janice Wolk Grenadier Divorce case, whom Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman had intervened in. That he is not alone his supervising Judge — Judge Lisa Kemler Supports this type of behavior and Judge Nolan Dawkins contributes to it. That 3yreme Court of Virginia needs to step inimmediately. That an injunction to Stay the Orders of December 23, 2015 should be immediately put into place by this court as Judge Clark has not got the integrity to follow the law, the Judicial Canons, the rules of the Supreme Coutt of Virginia or the United States of America, That Judge Clark was very clear ‘Due Process” was not a defense to him That using the Jails to collect money for his friends was not a problem 1. Judge Clark is no different than a soldier of Hitler taking Orders from lawyers and other Judges to protect one of their own and himself for his personal criminal actions. As he did from Lawyer Andrea Mosley when she didn't want documents submitted into the court record that showed the criminal acts of this court and Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman, 2. Judge Clark is no different than Judge Bellows who bullied Chris Mackney to suicide — | call it MURDER ~ you can read about it in Mike Volpe’s book — Bullied to Death 3. Judge Clark is no different than Judge Ciavarella from Luzene County PA who went to jail for Cash for Kids for when he stated on November 22, 2014 to Michael Wieser “I am so sorry I can not collect your legal fees for you. You will need to come back for a Judgment” Mr. Wierser never went back for a Judgment nor did DiMuroGinsberg and now Judge Clark has given llona Grenadier Heckman the power to foreclose with no real hearing on Janice Wolk Grenadier’s home - Judge 4Clark is no different then CASH FOR KIDS Judge's Ciavarelta etal That on December 23, 2015 George McDermott under oath that Judge Clark stated to Lawyer Michael Wieser “/ am so sorry / can not collect. your 's for you — you will need to come back for aj ent That the City of Alexandria court has shown a pattern and Practice of denying Due Process to protect one of their Own Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman since 2012 by Judge Clark and from ‘September of 2007 by Judge Donald Haddock, Lisa Kemler, Nolan Dawkins, Fortkort, J. Howe Brown, James McGrath all chosen for favor by Judge Donald Haddock, ‘The issues with the facts are: Issue 1: Lack of Jurisdiction by the Judge: That in order for the Judge to have Jurislction they must not show Bias, Favoritism or Cronyism, Retaliation, Retribution. That Judge Clark has shown all five with the appearance of ex- Parte communications, the lack of respect for a ProSe Litigant. On its own initiative, the court has ignored the laws and rules ‘when they did not hold Judges accountable for violating the Judi Canons and denying Petitioner denying any fair hearing in the court where a Judge was chosen fairly. Where all Judge's have been chosen for as stated in May of 2008 by Judge Donald Haddock who stated "You can’t win this we ‘LOVE" llona’” Judge Donald Haddock for his LOVE of Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman has Violated all the Judicial Canons,Petitioner has been denied all due process and equal protection guaranteed to other citizens. Based upon the history Circuit judicial conduct, and the involvement of court judges in serious misconduct being exposed by Petitioner, it would be a virtual impossibility for Petitioner to have the constitutional and statutory access to federal court and to the protections and defenses guaranteed by the U.S. form of government, Objection is based upon multiple bases, including the pattern of Court refusal to provide relief from hard-core civil rights violations; the aiding and abetting of these violations; blocking Petitioner from reporting serious state and federal crimes implicating state and federal personnel, including state and federal Judges; due process and equal protection rights. Refusing to address the issues raised by Petitioner, refusing to issue findings of fact and conclusions of ‘aw, has been standard practice of these court judges. ‘The reason for denying Petitioner protections was due to a convoluted series Of corrupt judicial acts associated with a scheme to silence Petitioner's reporting of serious crimes implicating judicial officials, and to block her Constitutional state and federal defenses against the retaliatory acts judicially taken against her. That Petitioner is seeking relief from the order to judicial seizure of her home and looting of Petitioners life's assets after she was forced to exerese Bankruptcy remedies with her divorce where she now realizes Divorce Lawyer llona’s actions were criminal from February 14, 1986 6with Petitioner with Lawyers along with Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman lying in all court's shows the pattern and practice of the Federal and State Judiciary of "Scratch my back | will Scratch yours" Petitioner to obtain relief from an ongoing pattern of criminal activity of Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman, the banks, the government and the lawyers in judicially- inflicted civil and constitutional violations, 'ssue 2: Lack of Discovery, Admissions and Depositions : That without a Falr hearing, time for Discovery, Admissions and Depositions how can a Plaintiff / this Petitioner put a full ase together. That the Bill of Complaint Clearly States the Claims, Clearly gives evidence of Divorce Lawyer liona Grenadier Heckman et al the Criminal Acts and Actions thru e-mails letters, documents filed in the courts with forged signatures, perjury. That the case Should be Judged as requested by a Jury and not a Judge who is ruling from Chambers and ignoring the Law, denying all fair access to the Courts, Issue 4: Due Process for a Pro Se Litigant: The Judge did not give the Petitioner the ‘ight to argue and show evidence of the “TRUTH”. When the Judge afier Lawyer Andrea Mosley stated “we don't want other information in the record” and the Judge then shut down the hearing basically showed a Collusion to deny Due Process. Which he had already stated “Due Process 7was not an acceptable defense" That it is obvious the Petitioner has been denied Due Process in favor Lawyers and to protect other Judiciary members that have dirty hands. But, not only due process was denied in all hearings, the lawyers lied in documents, and in court. ‘The constitutional and statutory provision directly and indirectly involved in this Petition, each of which is being judicially violated, includes: 1. Due Process protections as guaranteed by the statutes and Constitution of the United States. Fifth Amenciment io the Constitution: No person shall be deprived of Iie, oerty or property, without due process 2. Equal protection ofthe law as available to other citizens, 3. First Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances. Circuit judges / Viginia Legislators / Federal Legislators /JIRC / Virginia State Bar have repeatedly blocked Petitioner's attempts to exercise this right, and when he has exercised it Fourth Circuit judges have retaliated and inflicted great and irreparable personal and {nancial harm upon her. 4 i nt right ted against taking of liberties 7 swithout due process of law, These protections were and are being repeatedly violated by federal judges, destroying - Petitioner's Fifth Amendment rights to be ‘secure in life, liberty and properties, to be free from FEAR of government persecution, and quality of life, wth the additonal violation of inflting great fear ‘upon Petitioner from the corrupt acts. 5, Tille 28 USC Sections 1331, 1343, guaranteeing to a citizen the right to federal court access and protections. Federal judges have repeatedly violated these statutory ‘rights, unlawfully and unconsttutionaly aismissing each and every action, ‘fraudulently placing a frivolous label on the fing to “support” their dismissal actions. Since 2007, state and federal judges have unlawfully and unconstittionaly dismissed every action which sought declaratory and injunctive relief, and which ‘Sought to report the federal crimes.6. Title 28 USC Sections 2201, 2202. State and Federal judges have repeatedly ‘dismissed every action in which Petitioner sought a declaration of Petitioner's personal and property rights, to defend against the taking of his assets in a sham, with 10 hearings. That this court in supporting Judge Clark et al has denied al FAIR ‘access to the courts. 7, Title 42 USC Sections 1983-1966. patter of judicialy-infcted civ rights violations, ‘perpetrated initially in the District of Columbia Court, then the Eastem Division of Alexandria courts, City of Alexandra Circuit Courts and then expanded by the ‘Supreme Court of Virginia who in Petitioners 1# and 2°¢ appeal denied law used in Tue, Dee 24, 2013 at 2.05 PM. Want to hear something more scarier contacted IlonaEly Freedman Grenadier Heckman your witch hunt is over Fromm: Leahbast2M-asheon Tue, Dee 24,2013 ‘To: jwrendier gmail comm ‘pps rest YOU DOT Hu" ews YOU ARE THE KIND THAT WOULD TURN. FTHEMIN fecauSe ONE PERSON SOMETHING TOYDU Ma Was vee ols aee Nee EO AND YOU LEON LNs FAMLY REJECTED YOU FORNOT GENO JEWISH You Tun cov, YOU WERE REJECTED... cer nitr nro Your Tex Sk. NOWYOU ARE Wand UP STORES ND eraBADNO uss! BLAMING ALL JEWS LIKE HITLER FOR NOT LIVINGON EASY STREET neu crror your 0 coon vovtosrs vou over wuss ounseus wo o0:0 YOU ARE THE NAZI WORSE A MUSLIN LOVING NAZI isso, YOUSELP TTS WHY OU ANTE DWE REE RNSThat Judges and Lawyers to ignore the above e-mail is a disgrace and should be an embarrassment to the United States of America. That the Jewish community Supports an e-mail such as that with Billions in support going to that country should be a wake up call for all Americans. That fact we send our Young men and women to fight for rights Petitioner does not have in her own country is a disgrace to the United States of America. JUDGES LACK OF JURISDICTION TO VOID STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS Obviously, judges, entrusted to uphold the laws and Constitution of the United States, lack jurisdiction to: * Void the rights and protections quaranteed under our form of government, laws, and Constitution, © Deny to any citizen the right to a declaratory judgment and injunctive lief for the hard-core violations of federally protected rights stated in the complaints ar an by reference to cour Virginia Circuit Courts running as A Racketeering Enterprise - Federal offenses related to refusing to perform a duty: Judges have the Fesponsibiities, the duty, to receive testimony and evidence of the state and ‘federal crimes that Petitioner discovered, and to provide declaratory and injunctive relief from the gross violations raised in Petitioner's state and federalCauses of actions. Refusal to perform these responsibilities violate federal statutes, including, inter alia: A. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Jurisdiction and duty to provide a federal court forum for relief from violations of federally-protected rights, B, Tile 28 U.S.C. § 1343, Makes any person who fails to prevent or aid in the prevention of civil/constitutional violations, who has the power to do 80, financially liable to the party that suffers the harm, ©. Title 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 through 1986. Financially liability for refusing to prevent the harm associated with civil rights violations FAILURE TO PERFORM A DUTY TO PROVIDE RELIEF D. Culpable omission of a fiduciary duty to receive evidence of federal crimes and fallure to provide relief. Itis a federal offense for any officerjiudge to refuse fo Stated herein. Failure to perform a duty constitutes an assault or battery, a federal offense, when a federal official fails to perform a duty to act. See W. LaFave & A. Scott, Criminal Law 21011 (2d ed. 1986). in People v. Burden, 72 Cal App.3d 603. (1977) similar analysis was utlized. The principal of culpable omissions is no stranger to federal law. For instance, Tile 28 USC § 1343 makes any person lable for damages when that person fail to prevent or aid in the prevention of cv ight violations, and the victim suffers harm. In Califomia, for instance, See Barclay’s Oficial Calitomia Code of Regulations, Tite 11, 1081 (1991), the law requires, ‘among other things, that officers prevent crime, protect life, ensure equal justice, and ‘blow the whistle on unethical fellow officials. Califomia Government code section 1222, approvingly cited in People v. Pringlo, 151 Cal.App.2d 754, 858 (1984), allows ‘punishment of afcers for faliag to pertorm their duties ‘where no special provision is: ‘made for the punishment of such delinquency.” defendants wilfuly falled, and refused, to protect Stich, knowing that Stich was ‘suffering great and imeparable harms, and that these harms would continue to occur. BDefendants‘ failure and refusal to act occurred with the full knowledge ofthe criminal ‘nature of their refusal, Defendant's guity mens rea is clearly establishod, F. Guilty of betrayal of a trust. Federal judges have the duty to uphold the laws and Constitution of the United States; to provide constitutional and statutory protections to « person suffenng from the violations of federally protected rights. Violating these protections, aiding and abetting those committing the violations, makes the federal Judges quity of a betrayal ofa trust. G. Duty to report criminal acts under California Penal Code. California Penal Code section 387, requires a corporate manager or executive who had actual knowledge of 4 serious concealed danger to notify the appropriate regulatory agency within 15 ‘days. Failure to do so constitutes a felony. This would include reporting criminal acts. H. Guilty of felonies, including: {aficting harm upon a vietim or informant (18 USC § 1512, 1513) * Inficting harm upon a citizen in retaliation for exercising rights and protections under the laws and Constitution of the United States. * Misprision of felonies, obstruction of justice, becoming an accomplice, and other federal crimes, Petitioner would classify the Virginia Circuit courts as a racketeering enterprise. This group of judges have consistently blocked the reperting of major criminal activities implicating state and federal officials. it has persecuted concemed citizens seeking to expose this corruption. In Petitioner's case these Judges have inflicted enormous personal and financial harm through a pattern of record-setting civil right violations through misuse of the federal judiciary. JUDGES HAVE, AND ARE, INFLICTING, AND CAUSING To BE INFLICTED, GREAT HARM UPON PETITIONER AND THE UNITED STATES of AMERICA CITIZENS‘The actions by judges ignoring Petitioner's attempts to report criminal activities by state and federal officials and others make possible the Continuation of the criminal and subversive activities discovered by Petitioner ‘and other present and former federal and state personnel and investigators. ‘These same judges ere blocking Petitioner's attempts to expose the judicial Corruption in proceedings that impoverish thousands of people yearly, and is denying Due Processto the Petitioner, Petitioner has attached as Exhibit 3 the Statement of Facts for the Appeal as to ‘What took place on December 23, 3016. SUMMARY ‘The issues are serious. They are of great national importance. With the nation’s increasing attention to crimes, these crimes by state and federal judges (and the underying crimes being covered up) are of far greater gravity, and sets the mindset for government and nongovernment conduct throughout the United States. No reasonable person could fail to recognize the aravity ‘of this rampant judicial corruption occurring under the auidance of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court RELIEF REQUESTED State and Federal law dictates prompt and meaningful relief, which should include: That all Documents that Plaintiff has fled should be used in assessing these issues,Relief requested: A stay in the State of Virginia on any and all hearing as well as an immediate Judge assigned to this case who will hear it on its merit, the documents, the discovery and all "TRUTHS" supposedly your best defense. Wherefore this court should on it's calendar as soon as possible schedule Oral Arguments in regard to the above allegations, or a Trial by Jury if applicable should be had by Petitioner Janice Wolk Grenadier, Exhibits Attached: Exhibit _| Description Pages 7 ‘Order for Diviurolnaberg — te lal page ea ped page of what |g Janice wrote by hand for easier reading z Order for TroutmanSanders ~ the lasl page i a ped page of what 1G Janice wrote by hand fr easier reacing 3 ‘Siatoment of Facis from Court Daled December 3, 2075 as vo Cour L Reporter present for Appeal to Supreme Court of Virginia 4 Matin for Judge Clark o recuse himself denied on Dec 23, 2078 5 ‘cle outine on some of he eininal acts - Murder for Hire eal [4 a) 1, Janice Wolk Grenadier, am the Defendant inthis action. 1 personally set forth the allegations ‘of fact in this Answer and Counter Claim Cross Complaint, and I hereby declare under penalty of Perjury that each of said allegations i true and correct. Date: December 252015 ‘Alexandria, Virginia 22301 ‘Telephone (202) 368-7178, Email juprenadier@pmailcom Subscribed swan before me 28 Fy ot eager, 2015 ei Ce aaa PR He My commission expies: ___/@ !5/, eres tes SE aye@ COMPLAINT MalL To: sludicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 Richmond, Virginia 23218-0367 "Note: The Commission does not accept fax or e-mail complaint, Name of Judge Location of Court Date of incident Name: (printedypaa) “ * aT Pa Tay SRSERSAY Mitel WE Grenada cones Telphone: Ait 208 7/797 Address: Note: The Comnission does not accept unsigned complaint, Revied: 0405 05,‘Janice Wolk Grenacfer «15 West Spang Street ‘Alexandra, Virginia 22901 \arenacior@ gmail.com 2-368-7 178 August 20, 2014 ‘Ms Katherine B. Bumett Judicial Inquiry and review Commission ‘Apo 100 North Ninth Street Corporate Headquarters Florence Building 111 North Figgins Ave, Suite 200 Missoula, Mt 50802 Richmond, Viginia 23219 Judge James Clark 520 king Strest Aerancia, Viginia 22314 ‘ie: Janice Wok Grenacer Pro Se, Plantit— ‘morrow Jane 2014 KATHERINE 8. BURNETT. LE: Ration and Fetaatn ning a enderce of Detencant, nee ater Hora Ey Freedman Greader Heckman wo mit her, Michael Waser and he cham oe ole Car eee chosen 10 meace Judge Haddock who LOVED ILONA™.lgaing the lao Horest Socs ne Sona Zuma society, you scratch my back, wih the beleve Thowe’s nothing you can do?" jour went eee ar ie ne Roe ftiniate Bulle lit wth fl tne as aprox. $3000 in leg oes sanctioned lor nyo ea hs ved ‘On September 12,2007 ona Grena La Gmc tt hs ut won my aoe no Aue Mas a ony ing to iin cout The Skapay Seon ee Teas sere eects of Eau tates, ue Process, Bind Jus. Honest Series and the despane resi oaNas ans os Do ss a kee peony cl Krona ore nan Hoe wy, hugh gee may + S307 mnt, a constenal nd opis, anpetng wih dees, mal Wl, Sen Sony oe ex pare communicators, hansame a abelian a his ren ad cnc ans ots ey on. Accoing tue Cla th FAC asied hm ha was ws Mo tno mcle ae cece ene Wok Girma aye natin sen ae eng mene rasa hed, along them an coun, tem cout dour. The atorays hae teen pas nha Sat eae inawer coses and cuts and the Supreme Couts when ol niuenced by Fatriism and Cromiam ci hold due accountable when thc knowing anc wing actions fl outside the Boundaries” ol thei fob deserilon, Theil et {ollow simple quielinesof thelr fost makes a Judge's action na ongera judicial act but an indviduel net ae act represents their own prejudices and goals. Case Law also state tha when a Judge acs a's besoensa of te tow, when a Judge does rat flow the law, he then loses subject matter Junsdiction and Ihe surges ordere'ee COS ot rae | docuneriod, an oeraheing amour of dence of dudlal Misconduct; Criminal Misconduct, deny of Honest Services nat ited to Conpacy; Collusion: Obstnicton of Justice. Tampering win Evers Malt Feane Honest Senes Fraud; Exorion; Harassment; Gang acy: Racketeeang, Retaition, Disrimination, a. Misconduct [Eile In Ofice ot wit decisions mado in bad ah fora compl purpose, deliberately and tertenaly fae tolow the law Extra aud Egreius legal amor; Vian of Procedural Pee: Valen ol Dee Proven Vee of Consitutena tts pr Tile 42.5.0, 1981, 1983, Tle 18 US. C. 241 & 242; Vigna Cade 1? ios Tee Cannons of sudcil Conduct and ies of Professanal Conduct have been ignered by all This nace gran eth the ght Koad others ata later cate, TOR aaHONS ne lst you mmunty andthe pretecien of yourjb, as my complaint was not neste, and aconting {2 tue Cart he was ghen the go med by youto sentence mot al and Frito legal les mit fh gun tne et nimi and Buly. Tat uke Car Questioning the honesty or Paintin Cou shows he ed nt red sy of Sts Baguners an evcerce wich shows Paiit hes ho “TRUTH on her sdethe beet daores coe cay raw Janie Wolk Grenadier aoooteri7e ‘arenadiee@amat cam “The appearance of Justice is just as important as Justice itself “ Judge Kloch in his letter of apology and to recuse himself. \d Review Commission. vs eee ara, Neh govern the conduc and cons of al jstes and judges ofthe Commanweath, retired jules and Frame ale fr real jul sevice, subst judges and spacel juste, judges po tempore nic sete ‘doe pro tempore and all mambers ofthe State Corporation Commision and Vina Werkrs’Compenceton {mison, cn be fou in Fart 6, Secon I ofthe Rules ofthe Supreme Couto Vigna, Rules tte eal URS governing proceedings before de Juco Iauky ard Review Commission § 17-202 Powers and dierop Commision conn: The Common veel withthe per and albeit ns rewicce hoger aco azarae ice which wold be the bass fr eetiemen, ensure remelofaiadee aedec AG We Gon 10ofthe Consiaon of Vireia and the poisons is chaptercven though abet ade aa re ce ce teow aie The Conmssion. fer such inves ctiomasitdcens neces, mat atderindcondhetheaeiine ek occ slur the Commonscalthaxit shlldcremine. the Commision fs the chars whe well fanloduad afer e heats reine censor remial of leit mafia nal compl beret Seprone Cour tn Goa Sul have haart mec mot confi withthe provirus haplersrof cemioinn ee em ee Hyriteninercombucted es. No utof the Coumsio sabe validuntesccamturel ets beemipat aria a Se. ISK IG 2072195, 215760500 ed)@ @ @ Exhibit 3 JUDGE JAMES CLARK 1) The Ceult Couto Azania id ot fl te paper work rough roger haanl fhe Supreme Court of Vega is beleved Refers Bowen Pet wa chosen wen he suppor fhe Supreme Couto Vinita e work in cason wih tne sthr Detendan 2) November 21,2011 Order sppiing ssge Rar Bowen Pot by The ‘Supreme Count Chet Justes Cynthia. Keer “To preside over tan ay ‘Proceedings on Monday, February 12,2012 2) Novombor 21,2011 Latter hon Paci G. Davo dg Rchard Pot at habe presi oe the regu season othe Ged Say “Tete one Pete M shesied atthe ‘Niges Fave ocesed terns ar Bare 4 Swot onto ay: Bp fi rts Cg ek Bare Fake cor oom, Savoie eet ou Pasa Fro a 73-7464829 5) January 4, 20%2 Lote Randy Song Conmonvestn Amey 6 ge Potee informing hen refuse JG i Font of the Grand uy ae Pai intone hi ‘wines’ (ator can be ound under Extib 16) 5) Pitt conics Supre Court egatng tera ord anyone cn we {o 14uoge Quaaton Vinen Par wooo te Che! dation he eter wr, ew gvento hen te Plat had twee the Cento Gut Pata Herengton wo ore her 7) sanwary 4, 2012 eter fom Meghan 8 Raber testing Pirie og ‘ton ver S200 For acons of code a pum RY pated my deny, Callen wit Randy Senge in wtp scaiitmcete Pai 8) sanwary 7, 2012 Lott JNG to Meghan. Roberts naneton eying nd ‘eaton iy that se ad epoke wen he Cade Enforcement and he ead st fatim wean was dora 8) January 8, 202 Lett Th Honarabe Cyto Kinser hit ustewo ‘gins Supreme Cour «Paint aa not vend oer conversation wt ecg Robelon ha anyone can wre a udge aloe. Thelsaua bark ne Ce Courtard mut be salwn inti Grout Cour *0}Janwary 8, 20%2 Fed Men fr sanctions aps Randy Senge conmonesth ‘tomoy fr ita go Pater, ERRNO peepee a mmen@ ‘1 Janary 1,202 race tobe hear on any 25,2012 +12) .anwary 24,2012 Leber tor Law Ga Chev Court ot Anantha my Maton for Saniora aga ir Sengel woul be hear by hdge Pat. Once agen he Cot Court ot Asana dows tt fotow ha nde '9)January 24 2012 Judge Clark say ston is Docket Ne was unaware ot ‘Wh bere hin. The Corpn iso inthe Cou Hause Tha he has ne* ‘eeu hina snd wae goat “Webrusr 1.2012 - Maton flee canard E¢ Somoran Clk Court answor ‘ipl qt about Grand uy Sie Alara has shown fe pt Neto ‘otow the Ue of be curs Hwa reasoner Pai ask Dai uestons which he reuse answer, Moe! ay he dosn't naw th Basi nes Pare fd on Feb for Motion be ad on Fabry 8, 2012 bythe new ope Judge Cla who had no recived ha rm eating te ese Yel "eted tear Moto aganst Randy Senge 18) February 2.2012 Leter Gs Couto Alexandra Moton Sanctons apn! Ea ‘Semonantabeheat a Sam Febnary 13,2012 by. tuge Pater 0) February 7.2042 Ltr to Crt Curt Judges & Eat Semonian Plat planed on bong in cout on Fabry, 2012 fat udge Cake nt rove Nea ‘TFebruary 8, 2012 Judge Carin court cons he has not recused meet ‘rom tho mat and tat tian’ on his dock. Yet Judge Clark thon hrm end saya yo Lam gong thar tis even hough la nat on my dosha 8 Judge Poter as Judge inthe Stata of Vigna took the ftowing Oath 22 Tawyor thon again tude under Rae § 4 aie yo gt hand, lease “Do you cll Sar aie tat yo wl ‘pper e Corataon af the United Sses tne Ganstsion oe ‘Sores of Vg, nd te You wl ety, nono prteasonly, tnd courteously damenn youre te prac oftaw an ee your oe of ‘Stormy sw othe bet four abit, sop you Gas?” ‘hla ae oxth than by newt arta Imam ach yor a the Supreme Courter nha ‘Ax 3 Judge the flowing Ont § 40, Fom of general oat regu of fee ‘ne Thera ae Txte very pron before entring upon te carpe fay futon aan fear ft Conmerweath shal ke and aubscrne te ose cet 2 slo sa (afi) at wt spp he Conan oo ‘Ary person rerponied toa ‘abaequen! om bog ‘ide Cin needed acne Nose the pt wanoharmy maton. The ws ‘dno tthe Cou ar vr car. By ha recuning Hack ty secon he ‘Suppose comup banaue th ahr Delenans, nines Anacne 1 Oametotee RRR ne Ca nceo: | sll we (oe) wl go 8 Conn fe Uni Ste he Cima of Common Vin ant yagi eh tne athe Cel Cot th ight ua Ct scien fay ty. ete al) York er — Tsisteer JAMES: CLARK eS 1, ha td et ied by he ls Be (common Vip quay barb dca eat Adee @ LZ the Cea Court ight Set Ct Ft ey Carts Ts elec Sere ceo weer Bee IMEDLATLY usc of some Sean Bu Sree Ca Do) ‘rab sy ands el gosh Saray be Cones etek ‘CtiotrPink us fie fas 2 canon Pine SENS slate ots 111 Be mo Soe Pr ndeOveez, Maye Ho. foe hide Jones C Coe Fivesvinons, 'NUTHE CIRCUIT COURE FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Paint * ae No.cHoIOKS4 (GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO.,LTD eta Defedans ORDER "Having raion he Pat Oppo t Orr by Jug Ck on Stement of st Spon 26,2012 hited yh Pion Dace 17,202 ope ‘ox mid Oppsiton dors conn eva informatica sit peri te ine mate, eb ‘ORDERED th the Sof Pos Oppiono Onder by fulgs Cu on Steet of Fat or Sepa 25,201 i denied FNTERED is ¢ 2. dey of Deere, 202. tah Copies ted Jisice Wak Grea, 15. Sp Suet. ‘Nenana S01 Mitel 1, Woe, Eagie Alceniis,VA' 2316 John MT, sie HOI Klag See Sete 10 Alec, VA 2314 ere |vinemnia: |THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Phin : case No. Hoos nEUADIER EET CO, LTD. ORDER ving ction he Ps Oppson wo Onder by Jue Chee Sateen ctf Spebe 25, 22st by he Pinion Deen 17, 2012 ad aperng "td Oppsition docs tent eva iafeaton it pris theta er is ry ‘ORDERED ht th ig of Pins Opps o One by Budge ik on Stsemest of Fae fo Beptomb 26, 2012 i doe FNTIRED is £7 ay of Decent, 2012. Bac a an Pc Lia eee aa . ated ete Sift ‘Alexa, VA' 22514 meunacnels tot ay Sica Se io Aennd, VA 2314 ones |VIRGINIA: INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Phin, ” Case No. CH 010654 GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO, LTD, etal, Defendants, re one fit THIS MATTER cae hve he Cot is 2h dy of Saete, 202 pon ‘AMidavit submited by counsel for Defendants Grenadier Investment Cox Lid and ona Grenadier and it ‘storey’ fe incured by those defendant itis hereby APPEARING thi copy ofthe Advi an Notice ofthe eter Orders rng sen ‘oe Pain by couse fr Defendants Greater Investment Ca, Ll and lona Gratien, ORDERED that ht james be ented guns Janice Wolk Grenadier infvor of Dende Grenade Investment Co, Li, and Homa Grenier and th aie Wolk Grenadier Se witin 0 days of ety of this Onkr pay wo Hon E. Grenadier co the fim of DiMuroGinsberg, F.C. 1101 King Street, Suite 610, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 the sum ofoe: Jo2e = as and for her atomey’s fees expended as « result of the motions and opposions decided thie days AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADIUDGED and DECREED that the endorsement Of this Onder and atached Order ate dispensed with under Ve. Sup. C. Rule 1:13 and tha he Clerk ofthe Court provide a copy of tht Onder to the pres inthe seladdessed stamped envelope provided hereto, AND This CRDER Is Finsa— ENTERED this_27 day of September, 2012 -———__— JANICE WOLK GRENADIER John M. Tran (VSB #24349) 15 W. Spring Street DiMuroGinsberg,P.C. Alexandria, Virginia 22301 1101 King Street, Suite 610 Jwolkgrenadier@aol.com ‘Alexandria, VA 22314 (703) 684-4333 (telephone) Plaintiff pro se Counsel for Iona Grenadier (708) 548-3181 (fesimile) ‘and Grenadier Investment, Co. | Michael 1. Weise, Esq (VSB #17630) 510 King Street, Suite 416 ‘Alexania, Vigiria 22314 (703) 836-7003 (telephone) | (703) 548-4742 (fesimile) Counsel for David M. Grenadier e Ome eae@ vinci: INTHE CIRCUMT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK ORENADIER Print, * (case Ne, cHo1oG5s |LONA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER ‘Aka LONA HECHUAN, and (GFENADIER INVESTEMENT CO, LTD etal, bot DAVID MARK GRENADIER Dotendants ‘Opposition to Order by Judge Clark on Statement of Facts for September 26, 2012 ‘de Cnt oes ou aco what has recent comet the Pitt strton the elu between tudes and Defeat lana Grenier tet ty were oon for ’sonnatin on Pato decare her ncorpetent fe ry futher norco gentomen asa arco Defendant ona wan to dg Panu getter oe Wiles@ ‘Plt can show ew pattem ofthe Cteut Court of Ateanda ag hse tht ‘reno apa of tho Ole Boy Network Example reer 1 ‘ke Feil - The court ofcias known at thie time are: the Clerk of the Court Edward Semeonian J, the Commissioner Chancery Michael Wetser, the Honorable Chief and Presiding ludge Lise & emir, and attorney aS. Soul The proceedings referenced by this Pettion ere: 09-001130, cH 04001230, and CL.05-001284- £586 17- Of Michael Fils Petion fr Wit of Mandamus & Prohibition tothe Supreme Court of Virginia Reads site court offi’ improper conduc i not limited to Mr. Fe andthe rete soughtin the Petition is of significant pubic Imponance. For example had the cour officials performed their mandated ministerial, utes in these proceedings, the bankrupty of General Motors andthe government's subsetuent mut-billon dollar balou ofthe "reser ond the “old” GMAC would have been avoided, Instead Mr. Feld and his counsel have been obstructed from seeing {ele and dened acces tothe records atthe Cult Court for the City of ‘Alexanca by threats of physical harm and the unethical behavior evidence inthis Petition, g 2 (3 2 Hf EE aia oS, OU HG a na ESAT a ‘Setaand ean by commit Chey Wea tami oie a ha.@ Pape on nario steno it Lt adr or wh asertiv Wesng Tne, ‘pase oat ont ost te ea ene ag Ss a eka Oe ino an tie Sagas ‘Sent nd even Ge cna este tT 6(phono vas ait yaar Atay et Eso Oot Meza Tin Buea neato ye Cancale See oe Sce = ‘igor Ba ny tn don At srg etry trip ites As Tes a ow eee een Gd ar mere emacs Ace ce ripen tear ape ae Panetta amt ‘rcp cang pra lab ~pr we From tn ene Spe Deron ead pce Fgeeaan12c¥.0) OC Facer Cu nl pen OC a eto ieprn eae ycroyexsend ds pasa yee rg sow upto once tg th nh say uaon. Roce bre Te ine errs of tees aie, Mater pratt Coa casera ing mths Mein for Reiwerent he Cid ihe eset of nest eal dion ‘np byte blather who en $0 milion et worth welcooneced ‘Washing DC tgs wye i evence ins bed DC, VA. nd MD jes ‘od ofits chee his nw cog 6 ea Lidmpiag ei coecalnce cog ‘Scpopr frum spn ack ator sre the Potomac Rie tag bn, neta cases with promise of plo vers inching wane with ‘scmoendntons orig ounppinonet. Evidence was un ote ste cout and fica of te ilies pate rc of oto ead ‘ead po cours te rimialesvy, bt tht evdeace war cooley noe ‘tigi king lak of pay fo he Mather and Ci who re ti of Interest seul retin and ape, cacy ext timo, nd harmed yor ‘fal to be core no songs Cid by Wika Ea Walle. “Jug Ca further des not go ht te at hat he had recused ims by a ‘anpaarace inthis case on 1. January 25, 2012 not hearing 8 Maton ed appropiate Wi he Gorse conrad