You are on page 1of 28
COMPLAINT MAIL To: Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 Richmond, Virginia 23218-0967 Note: The Commission does not accept fax or e-mail complaints Name of Judge.Judae Donald Haddock Location of Court City of Alexandria Circuit Court Date of incident Case Name or Number (if known) Current Status of Case. ‘Name and telephone number of persons who witnessed the judge’s conduct: Description of what the judge said or did that you believe was improper: (additonal pages may be attached) DO NOT SEND ORIGINAL COURT RECORDS/RECORD WILL NOT BE RETURNED Name Daytime (Please Print Clearly) Janice Wolk Grenadier ‘Telephone (202) 368-7178 Address Revieed:09 1014 COMPLAINT Juicial Inquiry and Review Commission Posi Ottice Hox 307 Richmond, Virginia 23218-0367 (The Commission does not accept fax or email complaints*) ‘adda, rumorige __sJuudee, Pred Tht k Location of Court Ciyourt Cat of lew andor Date ofincident Septum bu. 20071 40_pteginA> ose Nane or Number (irnown) Ct OF dHol Mo! [00 1462- ce lane tat FE MOIS sah ogre 3 fin {aly Hee Dione Fiske Cut Peat mretratoy {dang Def t pe i at tei ine i 7 @ ) Lm) biiraui @ ma. (additional pages may be attached) Taber Cea lonion Wolk femadrey Tarpnnet IOS) b3- WSS SD a aga ' Morand Vo. 44 + faeyeaul 04 aie D jue save @® Judge Donald M. Haddock ~~ JIRC Complaint 1.12.2012 Circuit Court of Alexandria Virginia 520 King Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (On September 7, 2007 by appearance and actions of the Circuit Ccurt of Alexandria all Judges recused themselves. The Circuit Court of Alexandria did net follow the rules of ‘The Supreme Court of Virginia Rule 17.1-105(b) This was in violation of my Civil Rights, my Constitutional Rights, and The Law of the Supreme Court of Virginia which {8 a Judge you the responsibiliy of knowing. In conclusion you either you did not know the law ~incompetenca, or, you ignored the law ~ unconscionable! | understand many courts have found that judges who have acted in heir judicial ‘capacity were entitled to immunity. But, courts have found that the judges who acted ‘outside of their judicial capacity were not entitled to immunity. Which | believe this is the case with Judge Haddock and all the Judges from September 7, 2007 who have ruled ‘on my case are in violation of many different laws which you lose immunity. Under the ‘common law, judges are generally immune from civil lablity for judicial acts, but they do ‘ot enjoy this immunity when there is criminal liability. Judges are not protected by immunity when they have acted in the clear abeence of all uriedictions.” | believe in this case Judge Haddock and all the Judge's from this date have actad with Malice and Clear intent to follow Judge Haddock’s wishes. Judge Haddock the head Judge of the Circuit Court of Alexandria — who to my face told me | would not get a fair trial and how they “Loved llona’. “Has also been quoted of saying how he believes in Nepotisiom, Judge Haddock is a trespasser of the law, as the head Judge - the Judges you choose to hear my case did not have subject-matter jurisdiction and there orders are vold, of no legal force or effect. Whenever a judge acts where helshe dos not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason, When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason, | gave The Circuit Court of Alexandria an opportunity to fix this error ~ Instead they personally have added insult to injury causing me much stress - even more upsetting ‘what this has done to my children. How many times have the police come to my home to make sure | have not committed suicide over what actions Judge Haddock and the ‘other Judges helping him to allow llona Grenadier favoritism out of fis "LOVE" for llona have taken. tlona Grenadier who lied in Court ~ but, is a part of his cub. He has fost his immunity. He as a judge did not follow the law, ie. ycu are a trespasser Of the law, he as a judge has lost subject-matter jurisdiction and any orders should be void, of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 US, 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that “when a state officer acts under a state {aw in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict withthe Superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his @ _ individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibilly to the supreme authority of the United States." ‘To make matters worse Judge Haddock has now interfered with my right to go in front of a Regular Grand Jury. 7 Janice Wolk Grenadier ‘19 W Spnng Street Alexandiia, Virginia 22301 703-623-9655 jwolkgrenadier@aol.com ‘September 21, 2011 Judge Donald M. Haddock Gircuit Court of Alexandria Virginia 520 King Street Atexandiia, Virginia 22314 Dear Jucge Donald M. Haddock, ‘On September 7, 2007 by appearance and actions of the Circuit Court of Alexandria alll Judges recused themselves. The Circuit Court of Alexandria dic not follow the rules of ‘The Supreme Court of Virginia Rule 17.1-105(b) This was in violation of my Civil Rights, my Constitutional Rights, and The Law of the Supreme Court of Virginia which ‘as a Judge you have the responsibilty of knowing. In conclusion you either you did not know the law ~ incompetence, or, you ignored the law — unconscionable! | understand many courts have found that judges who have acted in their judicial capacity were entitled to immunity. But, courts have found that the judges who acted Outside of their judicial capacity were not entitled to Immunity. Wrich I believe i yours and all the Judges from September 7, 2007 who have ruled on my case are in Violation of many different laws which you lose immunity. Under the common law, judges are generally immune from civil iabilty for judicial acts, but they do not enjoy this immunity when there is criminal liability. Judges are not protected by immunity when they have acted in “the clear absence of al jurisdictions.” | believe in this case You and all the Judge's from this date have acted with Malice and Clear intent to follow your wishes Judge Haddock the head Judge of the Circuit Court of Alexandria — who to my {ace told me | would not get a fair trial and how they “Loved llona’ You are a trespasser of the law, as the head Judge - the Judges you choose to hear my case did not have subject-matter jurisdiction and there orders are voi Of no legal force or effect. Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason. | gave The Circuit Court of Alexandria an opportunity to fix this error - Instead you Personally have added insult to injury causing me much stress - even more upsetting ‘what this nas done to my children. How many times have the pole come to my home to make sure | have not committed suicide over what actions you out of your "LOVE" for liona have taken, tlona Grenadier who lied in Court ~ but, is a part of your club. ‘You have lost your immunity. You as a judge did not follow the law, ie. you are a trespasser of the law, you as a judge have lost subject-matter jurisdiction and your ‘orders should be void, of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1887 (1974) stated that "when a state officer ‘acts under a state law in a manner violaive of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict wth the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the ‘consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibilty to the supreme authority of the United States.” | have gone to the JIRK committee to the VSB — The Supreme Court of Virginia, to my State Representative. To be told | have no rights 1 am not a part of The Virginia Old Boys network. ‘THEREFORE | willbe filing suit against all parties who have decided | am not of value to deserve a fair trial. Who have violated The Rules and discriminated against me. | ‘am notifying everyone of this - On Wednesday September 28, 2011 if|have not heard from you | will assume you are not interested in setting this and will fle su against you. Warmly, Janice Wolk Grenadier Prose Party VIRGINIA: INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA AT ITS CRIMINAL TERM COMMENCING October 11, 2011, © recttcrmsat - Heist , Commonwealth of Virgin DONALD M. HADDOCK Works at 520 King Stret, Alexandria, Virgins 2314 Race: Cavesian Sex: Male Fige 61" () WET: 200(2 Ey ssh: ( Brown (?) Hair: Drown (*) Defendant “The Grand Jurors ofthe Commonwealth of Virginia and the City of Alexancria, attending the Court aforesaid, ‘upor their oath present that, in the City of Alexandria, in violation of Virginia Code Section § 18.2-481. 4182-481. Treason defined; how proved and punished. “ress shall consist only in: (1) Lerying war against the Commonwealth; (2) Adhering tit enemies, giving them ad and comfort; (3) Establishing, without authority ofthe legislature, any government within is Tits separate from the existing goverment; (@) Holding or executing, in such usurped government, ny office, or professing allegiance or ielity to itor 5) Resisting the execation ofthe laws under color of ts authority. uch treason, if proved bythe testimony of two witnesses tothe same over act orby confession in cour, shall be punishable asa Class 2 feloay. NOTE: Under Virginia law, there is NO “Statute of 4174-105. Designation of judges to hold courts and assist other judges. '. fall the jadges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any ase, civil or criminal, pending in their court ast render it improper, in ther opinion, for them to preside atthe trial unless the cause ‘proceedings removed, s provided by law, they shall enter the fat of ror and the Clerk ofthe court shal at once certify the same to the Chie Justice ofthe Supreme Court, who shall designate a jodge of ome ober court of record or rete judge of any such court to preside tthe tril of such case. In his cate agsiast the widow ofa former Alexandria judge, the Alexandria judges refused to obey the aw. tations” on Felony Crimes. § 182-21. When and where accessories tried: how indicted. ‘Amaccessory, either before or after the fact, may. whether the principal felon be convicted or not, or be amenable to justice or not, be indicted, tried, convicted and punished in the county or corporation in which he became accessory, or in which the principal felon might be indicted. Any such accessory before the fact ‘may be indicted either with such prineipal or separately. § 19.2-191. Funetions of a grand jury ‘The functions of a grand jury are twofold: (1) To consider bills of indictment prepared by the attoey for the Commonwealth and to determine whether as __toeach such ill there is sufficient probable cause to return such indictmenta tru bill.” (QO Te investigate and report on any condition that involves or tends to promote criminal activity cither in ~~ the community or by any governmental authority, agency or official thereof. These functions may be ‘exercised by either a special grand jury or a regular grand jury as hereinafter provided, VIRGINIA: @ INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA AT ITS CRIMINAL TERM COMMENCING October 11, 2011 § 192-197 states in part: igently inquire, and true presentment make, ofall ‘Ueh matters as may be given you in charge, or come to your knowledge, touching the present service au aall Present no person through prejudice or ill-will, mor leave any Unpresented through fear or 2t0%, but in all your presentments you shall preset the truth the whole truth, and nothing ut the eth So help you God,” Visini Law states the Jury Foreman is not to “eave any unpresented through fear or favor” that Jered mean Presentments from any Citizen about Violation of Laws ot Abuse of Authority by a Ines udees, « Commonvealih Attorney, an elected Court Clerk, o other Governmental Ofclal, in Bart ofthe Juror’s Duty to God and Country and the Commonwealth of Virginia. Equal Jenne {or Al includes the lowest Citizen is equally protected bythe laws as protects any atiorsey or Jodee, $ 192-208. subpoena power of special grand jury dees and ny may sutpoe persons appear before ito testy and to produce spcifd recon, papers. and ‘documents or other tangible things. {ration the Virginia Sate Police website reveals they can be assigned to conduct an investigation by the Governor, Fe eer a Grand Jury, Often an investigation would tke longer han the tee mous sar open Regular rand Jury's impaneled to serve soa separate panel of Citizens convened asa Special Grand lesen £122200 sates in part “..the cour shall inquire oft whether it recommends tha special grand jury be impanelled to perform any ofthe functions provided for in subdivision (2) of § saz Ife Jhalority of the grand jurors responds in the affimatve, the court shall impanel so many ofthat ray be necessary to complete the panel, as a special grand Jury aud ia minority ofthe grand Fors responds inthe afirmative, the court may impanel a special grand jury in the seme tanner 192195 states: A regular grand jury shall consist of not les than fie nor more than seven persons Sei cer hand § 19.2207. Composition of a special grad jury. Special grand jures shall consist of not les ‘thao seven and not more then 11 members. NOTE: Regular Grand Jury maximo fs 7 members, Special Grand Jary minimam is 7, maximum 11, NOTE: If the Regular Grand Jury is not quite prepared to vote a True Bll fora Direet Indictment for Government Agencies (Coun) or official thereof (Clerk and Judges) violation ofthe law, then the wice

You might also like