COMPLAINT MAIL To: Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 Richmond, Virginia 23218-0367 Note: The Commission dogs not accept fax or e-mall complaints, Name of Judge. Location of Court, Date of Incident ee GaseName or Number (tknown) (it O@54 5 Current Status of Case v Mame and telephone number of persons who witnessed the judge’s conduct (Pesctiption of what the judge said or did that you believe was Impropen (additional pages ray Be atiached) DO NOT SEND ORIGINAL COURT RECORDS/RECORD WILL NOT BE RETURN OD Name Daytime (Please Print Clearly) Janice Wolk Grenadier Telephone (202) 368.7178 Address Revised: 0042014COMPLAINT Jutical Inquiry and Review Commission Pos Office Box 367 Richmond, Virginia 22218-0367 (*The Commission does not accept fix or email complaints*) vonestige Thins A. feet bend sion orcout City OF Rlewandrin. CivOui-t Coat Date ornident__‘Ted0umn bO_1B, 8H 2007 1 Name or Number (finown) Ri olloo [4ez. egies Cr eae ann) Bev hay MAILTO: Ce Oo wea Cou Description of what the judge said or did fp you believe was improper: i - | ——Woitfa santos ill brrradees = Pax Meese Plt (additional pages may be attached) Pimerin Cray user Woll Gena deer nbs 63) AB-Y6SS Aes 19 Bt a 2230/ Shi WAL Clientes tpt |4/90/3 spansdidge Thomas A. Fortkort | —~ JIRC Complaint 112.2012 Circuit Court of Alexandria Virginia 520 King Street ‘Alexandra, Virginia 22314 Pe necember 5, 2007 as asked by the Cicult Cour of Alexandria to. oversee a case Alene figes ofthe Circuit Court had recused thamsehen "Sra ‘Taaianata had not followed the rules of The Supreme Gout of Virginia Rule 17.1- Sr satis was in Violation of my ivi Rights, my Constitalcna’ Rig raoporaubteme Court of Virginia were broken, which as a lucge Ke Incompeters knowin. In concusion Judge Fortkort ether aid notion the law ~ incompetence, or, he ignored the law ~ uncanscionsilel copgerstand many courts have found that judges who have acted in their judicial care fate ented to immunity. But, courts have found that the judges who acted Shon neimune fom cv laity for judicial acts, but they do'ree enjoy this immunity seg res ciminlfabilty. Judges are not protected ip immunity when they have are uae cleat absence of all jurisdictions." Ibeliove in tie oe ‘Judge Fortkort and Fr egludae's from tis date have acted with Malice and Chere oer to follow the wants farang Haddock the head Judge of the Circuit Court of Alcorn ‘who to my face {old me | wculd not get a fair tral and how they ‘Loved lone, He is a trespasser of the law, he did not have ‘subject-matter jurisdiction and his does not rit,2f Re legal force or effect. Whenever a judge ga where heishe does not have jurisdiction to a: gaged in an act or acts of ve jurisdiction fo act, or they issued by a judge without juriediction), they and are engaged in treason. Prertunity to fx this error — Instead they have h stress - even more upsetting what this Nae deneacts under a state law in a manner violative ofthe Federal Constitution, he “comes into fe ofc eee SuPeroraumorty ofthat Consitition, and he iin tot ee stripped of Dis official or representative character and is subjected ih person to the immunity ons gt lvidual conduct. The State has no power to pen to him any “muni from responsbity tothe supreme authority of the United Stas WEREFORE all Judges who have decided | am not of value to deserve a fair trial Yih have violated The Rules and discriminated uyainet oe ray this committee them to foe oious aiid Sends a strong message lo all these nets on You expect ‘them to follow the rules of the State of Virginia's Gate,Exhibits JUDGE THOMAS FORTKORT 1 Decombar 6, 2007 as uses bythe Cecut Cour of Avandia oer @ {Curt Alesana had nat chow ners The Supreme Cou iene ule 174-4050) ‘The wasn won of my Cl Rants my eecoaece Rights, nd Tas aw of ne Supreme Cour & Vagina wee oker eas ida ie ho he espontiy of rovang. In oncuon uge Foon os ‘roth tow = competance, oi haiprrea below raresneen 2 dee Tomes Fortran a Judge nthe State of Virgie ook he fotowing Oath ana lawyer ton agin ana Judge undor Rule. Rees yur rat han, please: “Oo you ste seo ate a you wi ‘suppor te Const oe Und Stats ard pe Consane o Commerwrea a Vigna, ard at you wil try, Novasty, pein, ‘rd corey oman yours nDe rates aw a ents your eof ‘storey atin een your ei cae you Ga ‘hs ete oat an by nowy adritad layers each yar athe Seprome Court ot Ving YO ‘Asa Judge th foowing Out: § 1. Fem genre cab rues fe. Ear peron before ening upon to eacharge fay fecton aan sf th Conon afl insane stare Stay Sth oslo swear (rar) at wa span ne Corsmiscree ted Sts ar the Cortona thw Caneonwea of rg a hat | ety one mparaty cacao ate cuss namsear ens Se 15. searing tote best of my aby, ohana ‘Ary pron rapport ary offi by gbernaloral ppoitnent a ‘Brequnt em bog mada upon expean oon eat toes not be ‘eave rew he cath stout eoton however he as eat eee a Comin in eet wih respecte subccnuna stele Feri has lat cil immunty. The res fhe Sure Cut ar vey eran 57.5105) that when ale ges ose thersces atin Seo Cour Crit uson wi choos the Joe's ohwar to case,Joige odor wen ‘ering tm snatch ls under tha cor of aera,hse Feros acon inva he Rule, ating wth norte te ‘soptarice ot supporting be upsossne beha’ f he Vegmta Geen Gea ‘Alsandi, an abporing ne wates of Suge Haddock. ude Neck an Se He ss tegpanar of te iw, he id not hve sutoct mater scion ad hi rer ‘voi rang fre eect Whenevr fudge sca ness kes ea ardent ac te judge's ngagedin ana oval eneon Weer nat on hy done have cco tact ey entre void a sna by 8 ap witout racer), hey become teepancrs be He hos at his mmuiy. Jug Fror a aug i ot fot eto ‘ospue of hel. a8. Jaig has ort satjecsnati sion sass sess ‘ould t vie fn gal fre ax we. The Us: Supreme Cont n'Seteue Fades, (16 US. 292, B4 SC 1683, 167 (1974) sed Pet wre sacar acts unto 8 at ew a ran vlae ote Fadel Consiton he cos hak efi wine superar autory ef a Cosine, erdhe ena cone sed ot {nsequnces of hi eda condi The Sat has po omer pe thn ay "mony Fa reeponeity oe supreme athrty es Unset extiote: 1) Moto fo Defaut ontou al be Ext) ladon Septonser21, 2007 2 Orcer denying Meson on Gecanber ZabSouthiny Tezzace) along with 1/2 of my Iepal fetes 69 1 but, £0 anne 18 easier Fan asking only for 1/2 of tn teas, Goensaiar - Pa Gresater/aonsd 9. Wlonne find attached the (ible G1) the Intersation de resace signed by "ona Groner and Bowie areradier, sve find atttobed (Eebibit "he ontne from 26s5e Hitchelt seiersin ste aissarsent of tain tn ae pmentcere "A “Te copy from the Sher fice which shows Mrs. Grenaer was served on September 7,207 noted hu Uauned Su habit bem saved “Cuda Var of day 04 asbese) atin Pamne An ee (CCP gett eae we cata SS = pee = TST pee a ESS oe EE 0 ER ent penta Sa a ——— “<0f—— Se vf se see seritonat2t wind atn s suzanejive Qeeetitie zor mona: [BTHE ORCUTT COURT OF TE CTY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICEWOLK GRENADIER, 7 Camplin, neh neste co, 170 ea Dr. cASENO cross ) ) d ) ) ) > d one > ‘epee eee nr DSB o CeplasMn en ran pin de teeing pent ony Coolant ro cou ete Dees ADDED, Ose DECREED 1 Trouser nt Ct cet 2 Comps Mon Dainese ety ee 2% Det Crees Compy a lay Go cy pes ve ets ent Aste ter rene ig ii vey) etn (Wis Order, nF ) 2608 Dita Dt Gms y pate ee fei Anteater ‘corona ing win eran dota afte Oni, Wits T® 05 5 Com pny his ena Ge Cs eta Cancer Sts dicey heeded a ine meTERED Wis of Veet 2007 SEEN AND AGREED: 2 Msc MAT42 nae Dori Gar 8. Wash ‘Asai VA22316 at 900 xs 3087 Goulart Cd ay CreerThomas Fortkort On December 5, 2007 as asked by the Circuit Court of Alexandria to oversee a case that the Judges of the Circuit Court had recused themselves. The Circuit Court of ‘Alexandria had not followed the rules of The Supreme Court of Virginia Rule 17, 105(b) This was in violation of my Civil Rights, my Constitutional Rights, and The Law of the Supreme Court of Virginia were broken, which as a Judge he had the responsibilty of knowing. In conclusion Judge Fortkort elther did not know the law — incompetence, or, he ignored the law ~ unconscionable! | understand many courts have found that judges who have acted in ther judicial Capacity were entited to immunity. But, courts have found that the judges who acted Outside oftheir judicial capacity were not entitled to immunity. Which I believe is in his and all the Judges irom September 7, 2007 who have ruled on my case are in violation ‘of many different laws which he loses immunity. Under the common law, judges are Senerally immune from civil liability for judicial acts, but they do not enjoy this immunity ‘hen there is criminal lability, Judges are not protected by immunity when they have acted in “the clear absence of al jurisdictions." | believe in this case Judge Fortkort and, all the Judge's from this date have acted with Malice and Clear intent to follow the wants of Judge Haddock the head Judge of the Circuit Court of Alexandria ~ who to my face told me I would not get a fair trial and how they “Loved llona’ Judge Fortkort's acons in Violating the Rule, acting with impropriety created the ‘appearance of supporting the unprofessional behavior ofthe Virginia Circuit Court of ‘Alexandria, and Supporting the wishes of Judge Haddock, Judge Klock and Judge Bondareff Kemler He is a trespasser of the law, he did not have subject-matter jurisdiction and his order is void, of ne legal force or effect. Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason. | gave The Circuit Court of Alexandria an opportunity to fix this err — Instead they have ‘added insult to injury causing me much stress - even more upsetting what this has done to my children. They are well aware of how many times the police have come to my home to make sure | have not committed suicide over what actions the Judge's have taken to protect llona Grenadier. He has lost his immunity. Judge Fortkort as a judge did not follow the law, ie. he is a trespasser of the law, you as a judge have lost subject-matter jurisdiction and your orders should be void, of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that 'when a state officeracts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he “comes into fanfic with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he isin that case stipped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the Sonsequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States" THEREFORE all Judges who have decided ! am not of value to deserve a fair trial, Who have violated The Rules and discriminated against me. | pray this committee {Bkes this very serious and sands. a strong meceage to all these jadyes tal YoU expect them to follow the rules of the State of Virginia's Code.“VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA AT ITS CRIMINAL TERM COMMENCING October 11, 2011 Commonwealth of Virginia ‘THOMAS A. FORTKORT ‘Works at: 520 King Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Race: Caucasian Sex: Male Hat: (2) WGT: (2) Eyes: (2) Hair: (2 2) Defendant ‘The Grand Jurors ofthe Commonwealth of Virginia and the City of Alexandria, attending the Cour aforesaid, "pon their oaths present that, in the City of Alexandra, in violation of Virginia Cade Section § 182-481 § 182-481. Treason defines; how proved and punished ‘Treason shall consist ony in (1) Levying war against the Commonwealth; (2) Adhering to is enemies, giving them ai and comfort; (©) Establishing, without authority of the legislature, any government within is limits separate from the exiting government: @) Holding or executing, in such usurped government, any office or professing allegiance or fidelity tot; or (6) Resisting the execution ofthe laws under color ofits authority, ‘Such treason, if proved by the testimony of two witnesses othe same overt act, or by confession in our, shal be Ponishable asa Class 2 felony. NOTE: Under Virginia law, there is NO “Statute of Limitations” on Felony Crimes. {§1741-105. Designation of judges to hold courts and assist othcr judges. 3. If all he judges of any court of record are so situated in respect lo any case, civil or criminal, pending in their court as to render it improper, in thei opinion for them to preside at the trial, unless the cause © proceeding is removed, as provided by law, they shall enter the fact of record and the clerk ofthe court shall at once certify the same to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge of ‘some other cout of record ora retired judge of any such cur to preside atthe trial of suck ease In this case against the widow of former Alexandria judg, the Alexandria judges refused to obey the law. § 182-21, When and where accessories tried; how indicted. ‘Whether the principal felon be convicted or not, or be ited and punished Inthe county or corporation in w! he beeame accessory, or in which the principal felon might be indicted. Any such accessory before the fact ‘may be indicted either with such principal or separately § 192-191. Funetions ofa grand jury. ‘The Functions ofa grand jury are twofold: (1) To consider bills of indictment prepared by the atorney for the Commonwealth and to determine whether as to.ach such bill there is sufficient probable cause to return such indictment “a true bill (2) To investigate and report on any condition that involves or tends to promote criminal activity cither in the community or by any governmental authority, agency or official thereof. These functions may be ‘exercised by either a special grand jury or a regular grand jury as hereinafter provided.VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA AT ITS CRIMINAL TERM COMMENCING October 11, 2011 § 192.197 sates in part: foreman who shall be sworn as follows: "You shal diligently inquire, and true presentment make, of all such matters as may be given you in charge, or come to Your knowledge, touching the present sevice {Loushall present no person through prejudice or ill-will, nor leave any unpresented through fear or favor, bu in all your presentments you shall present the truth, the whole trth, and nothing but the oth 80 help you God.” Virginia Law staes the Jury Foreman is otto “leave any unpresented through fear or favor” that ould mean Presentments from any Citizen about Violation of Laws or Abuse of Authority by a usee or Judges, a Commonwealth Attorney, an elected Court Clerk, or other Governmental Offical, {ate Part ofthe Juror's Doty to God and Country and the Commonwealth of Virginia, Equal Justice ‘or Allinclades the lowliest Citizen is equally protected by the laws as protects any attorney ot judge. § 192.208. Subpoena power of special grand jury. it smi grand jry may subpoena persons to appar befor to testify and to produce specified reco, papers, nd documents or other tangible things. {addition the Virsinia State Police website reveals they can be assigned to conduct an investigation bythe Governor, the Atiomey General,ora Grand Jury. Often an investigation would take longer than the thee onthe her arte Regular Grand Jury is impancld o serve, soa separate panel of Citzens convened as aSpeial Grand Jus i enc 3.102200 states in par: the court shall inquire of it whether it recommends that a special grand jury be impanelled to perform any ofthe functions provided for in subdivision (2) of § 2.---.If'a ‘majority of the grand jurors responds in the affirmative, the court shall impanel so may of that ur as answer in the affirmative and are also willing to serve thereon, plus any additional siembers as ‘may be necessary to complete the panel, as a special grand jury and ia minority of the grand Jurors responds inthe affirmative, the court may impanei a special grand jury in the same manner, § 192-195 tates A regular grand jury shall consist of nat les than five nor more than seven persons On the ther hand, § 192-207. Composition ofa special grand jury. Special grand juries shall consist of not less ‘han seven and not more than 11 members, NOTE: Regular Grand Jury maximum is 7 members, Special Grand Jury NOTE: Ifthe Regular Grand Jury is not quite prepared to vote a True Bill for a Direct Indictment for Government Agencies (Court) or official thereof (Clerk and Judges) violation ofthe law, then the wise Course would be a majority to vet to convene a new panel of 9 or 11 Citizens as a Special Grand Jury. imum is7, maximum 11, Grand Jury Witness: ATroc Bill__NotATrue Bill __ Special Grand Jury __ Majority Janice Wolk Grenadier, Citizen Special Grand Jury Minority Foreman of the Grand Jury